proposed avoided cost for cost-effectiveness determinations

13
1 Proposed Avoided Cost for Cost-Effectiveness Determinations January 5, 2009

Upload: thomas-kirby

Post on 04-Jan-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Proposed Avoided Cost for Cost-Effectiveness Determinations. January 5, 2009. Picking the Cost-Effectiveness “Limit”. Deemed Measure cost-effectiveness analysis uses regional avoided cost assumptions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

1

Proposed Avoided Cost for Cost-Effectiveness

Determinations

January 5, 2009

Page 2: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

2

Picking the Cost-Effectiveness “Limit”

• Deemed Measure cost-effectiveness analysis uses regional avoided cost assumptions

• Historically, these assumptions are consistent with the Council’s medium wholesale price forecast adjusted for:– Market price risk– Load uncertainty– Resource cost uncertainty– Fuel price uncertainty– Carbon control cost uncertainty

Page 3: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

3

Final 6th Plan Forecast of Future Wholesale Market Prices is Slightly Lower the Draft Plan

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Wh

ole

sale

Ma

rke

t P

rice

(2

00

6$

/MW

H)

Historical

5th Plan - Medium

Draft 6th Plan - Medium

Final 6th Plan - Medium

Page 4: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

4

This Is Due to Lower Forecast Natural Gas Prices and the Impact of RPS Resources

$0

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

$7

$8

$9

$10

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030City

Ga

te N

atu

ral G

as

Pri

ce (

20

06

$/M

BT

U)

5th Plan FinalDraft 6th PlanFinal 6th Plan

Page 5: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

5

Future Wholesale Market Prices Span a Wide Range

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Wh

ole

sale

Ma

rke

t P

rice

(2

00

6$

/MW

H)

Historical6th Plan - Low6th - Medium6th Plan - High

Page 6: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

6

Medium Market Prices Must Be Adjusted for Risk Before Use In Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

• The “Right” Market Price forecast is one that results in the amount of conservation identified as cost-effective by the Resource Portfolio Model (RPM) over 20-yrs– Lost-Opportunity = 3090 MWa– Non-Lost Opportunity = 2870 MWa– Total = 5960

Page 7: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

7

Method for Selecting the “Appropriate” Market Price Forecast

• Use Aurora Mid-C Market medium price forecast without carbon control cost

• Add “conservation risk premium” from Resource Portfolio Model (RPM)– $50 /MWh for Lost-Opportunities– $??/MWh for Non-Lost Opportunities

• Adjust Aurora price with premiums to reflect carbon control price until “mini-RPM” builds similar level of conservation as full RPM

Page 8: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

8

What’s the “mini-RPM”

• Identical to full Resource Portfolio Model except all inputs are “deterministic”– Medium price forecast for gas and electricity– Medium load forecast– Expected value cost for resources, forced outage

rates– Fixed carbon control cost and timing

Page 9: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

9

6th Plan Medium Forecast w/No Risk Premium or Carbon Control Cost

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30

Wh

ole

sale

Ma

rke

t P

rice

(2

00

6$

/MW

h)

Seg 1Seg 2Seg 3Seg 4

Page 10: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

10

6th Plan Medium Forecast with RPM Risk Premium without Carbon Control Cost

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30

Wh

ole

sale

Ma

rke

t Pri

ce (

20

06

$/M

Wh

)

Seg 1Seg 2Seg 3Seg 4

Page 11: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

11

6th Plan Medium Forecast with RPM Risk Premium and Carbon Control Cost*

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30

Wh

ole

sale

Ma

rke

t Pric

e (

20

06

$/M

Wh

)

Seg 1Seg 2Seg 3Seg 4

Page 12: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

12

6th Plan Medium Forecast Compared to Forecast Adjusted for RPM Risk Premium and Carbon Control Cost

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30

Wh

ole

sale

Ma

rke

t Pric

e (

20

06

$/M

Wh

)

Base Base+Risk Adj. Base+Risk Adj.+Carbon Adj.

*Assumes Flat Load Shape

Page 13: Proposed Avoided  Cost for  Cost-Effectiveness Determinations

13

Levelized Avoided Cost-Limit for Lost-Opportunity Conservation Resource Installed in 2010 with Flat Load

Shape and 20-year Expected Useful Life

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

Lev

eliz

ed C

ost

(200

6$/M

WH

)

Base Market Price Base+Risk Adj. Base+Risk Adj. +Carbon Adj.