professor paul bacsich and charlotte ash sheffield hallam university

18
Professor Paul Bacsich and Charlotte Ash Sheffield Hallam University

Upload: opal-mckinney

Post on 20-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Professor Paul Bacsich and Charlotte Ash

Sheffield Hallam University

OverviewOverview

Based on a 6 month JISC funded study to assess the Hidden Costs of Networked Learning.

Concentrate on the development and consequent evolution of the lifecycle model.

Four sections:- original five-stage model testing and development evolution of the final model examples of application

Traditional financial Traditional financial management management accountingaccounting

1. Difference between University-borne costs and Student-borne costs.

2. Distinctions between people and things.

3. Organisations have different kinds of people.

4. People do different things.

Extensive literature review lead to the identification of over 100 cost items

Analysed currently available models for recording the costs of technology-enhanced learning systems.

Including:-Orivel (1987) Cukier (1997)

Rumble (1989) Moonen (1997)

Crabb (1990)

The original The original modelmodel

Analysis shows serious omissions in current frameworks with a view to exposing the hidden costs.

1. Students are not considered.

2. Staff are not considered.

3. Courses grow from nowhere and vanish into oblivion.

4. No connection between learning and the environment in which it takes place.

The original The original modelmodel

The original The original modelmodel

Planning the learning experience/

environment

Maintaining the learning experience/

environment

Developingthe learning experience/

environment

Managing the learning experience/

environment

Providing the learning experience/

environment

Academic Staff

Support Staff

Students

Test Group One consisted of over 50 academics, administrators and senior management interviewed during the project.

Seven Institutions were selected (from a sector wide survey) to represent:-

research or teaching bias

geographical split

current status of Networked Learning activities

Test group oneTest group one

Omissions:-Senior Management Evaluation

Flexibility Sustainability

Employers Parents

Positive response to Maintenance, Support Staff and Lifecycle approach.

Simple methods have more impact on academics.

“Hearts and Minds Buy-in” needed

Test group one - Test group one - resultsresults

Small workshop held at SHU with prominent educators and financial experts.

Important to be equally as appropriate for costing traditional learning paradigms.

Ommisions:-Quality Assurance and Evaluation

Proposed four stage BPR model of:-Develop Market

Provide Assure

Test group twoTest group two

Original five-stage model dismissed as too complex.

Reject four-stage model as unsuitable for purpose.

Propose new three stage model.

Staff and students removed as their place is more secure now stakeholder analysis is creeping into education.

Results of testing Results of testing processprocess

Three-stage Three-stage modelmodel

Planning and

Development

Production and Delivery

Maintenance and

Evaluation

5-phase 4-phase 3-phase

Planning (implicit?) Planning....

Developing Develop ....and Development

Providing Provide Production &Delivery....

Managing Market ... (includesManaging and

Marketing)

Maintaining Assure Maintenance &Evaluation

Evolution from 5 to 3Evolution from 5 to 3

To ensure the viability of the new model we rechecked it against the literature.

Rumble (1989) and Rumble (1997)

Orivel (1987) Crabb (1990)

Cukier (1997) Moonen (1997)

Work in the training sector became relevant but not necessarily more comprehensive.

Stahmer (1995) Hunt and Clarke (1997)

RecheckingRechecking

Standard Rumble (1997) Moonen Stahmer Hunt & Clark

Planning &Development

Productionincluding

Development

Development Research &Planning

Development

Research &Development

InitialInvestment

Production &Delivery

Transmission& Distribution

Reception

Production,Delivery,

Operation...

Delivery Operation andSupport

Maintenance &Evaluation

(omitted) ... andMaintenance

(omitted) Disposal &Salvage

Comparison of main Comparison of main modelsmodels

Examples of useExamples of use

IssuesIssues

Lifecycle model developed to assist Institutions who do not have own iteration.

Wider context - illustrates a lack of consensus in the literature.

Adequate costing throughout the course lifecycle is needed to inform resource planning and aid effective management of organisational change.

ConclusionsConclusions

Professor Paul Bacsich

[email protected]

URL:

www.shu.ac.uk/virtual_campus/cnl/

Thank you for Thank you for listeninglistening