private urban governance research gated...
TRANSCRIPT
RE GATED COMMUNITIES
PRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
RESEARCH
CONFERENCE HANDBOOK
s
PRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
26-28 JUNE 2013BRIGHTON, UK
CONFERENCE
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
s
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
INTRODUCTION
The University of Brighton is a community of over 23,000 students and 2,600 staff based on five campuses in Brighton, Eastbourne and Hastings. We can trace our origins back to the mid-19th century in Brighton and the mid-20th century in Eastbourne. The last Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) found more Brighton academics working at international standards of excellence that any other post-1992 university. All these are factors which contribute to our reputation as a leading post-1992 university in the United Kingdom.
The School of Environment and Technology, home of the Brighton Planning School, is a research active school. In RAE2008, 43% of the research submitted by the School was rated as internationally significant and 90% at 2* or above. Research at the School of Environment and Technology includes brownfield site remediation, characterisation and management of major river systems, sustainable environmental treatment and re-use of marine sediments, and Water-related recreation.
The University of Brighton Planning School delivers socially purposeful higher education that serves and strengthens society and underpins the economy, contributes critically to the public good, enriches those who participate, and equips our graduates to contribute effectively as citizens to the profession and to their communities, locally, nationally and internationally. We are fully accredited for town planning education by the Royal Town Planning Institute and the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. In addition to commendations for best practice within the University of Brighton, in February 2012, we made the final shortlist of the Excellence in Teaching and Learning category at the RTPI Planning Awards. We are also a research active School. Our current projects include the INTERREG IVA 2 Seas 21st Century Parks, the INTERREG IVA 2 Seas GIFS (Geography of Inshore Fishing and Sustainability €4.6m), the project LIVING TOMORROW with the Brighton School of Architecture funded under the EU-program CULTURE (2007-2013), in addition to the INTERREG IVC SolidarCity, looking at the role and involvement of local and regional authorities and civic society in employment generation opportunities.
We welcome you to Brighton and to the University and wish you a very enjoyable and productive conference.
Dr. Samer BagaeenOn behalf of the Conference Organising Committee
CONFERENCE
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
DAY 1 - WEDNESDAY 26 JUNE 2013
PROGRAMME
13:00
Registration Desk Opens Huxley Building Reception (lunch, tea/coffee served)
15:00-17:00
Opening, Welcome and Keynote (Huxley Lecture Theatre) 15:00 Welcome from the organisers, Dr. Samer Bagaeen 15:10 Welcome to the University of Brighton, tbc 15:15 Keynote Address: Professor Saskia Sassen 16:00 Discussion & Audience Q & A
19:00 for 19:30
Conference Dinner The Hove Club 28 Fourth Avenue, Hove, BN3 2PJ www.thehoveclub.com After dinner Keynote: TBC
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
DAY 2 - THURSDAY 27 JUNE 2013
08:30 Coffee & Tea served (HU407)
09:00-10:30
Track Sessions
HU400/401
A16, Samer Bagaeen, The production of urban inequality: Urban gating, soft boundaries and networks of influence and affluence A01, Gulcin Pulat Gokmen, Ataol Ozlemnur, Ozsoy, Ahsen, Boundaries and Changing Urban Life in Istanbul A02, P. Stuart Robinson, Contemporary Urban Geopolitics: The Case of ‘Occupy London’
HU406 A12, Nicole Johnston, Transitioning residential multi-owned developments: conflicts of Interest arising A14, Veeramon Suwannasang, Quality of life & City resilience: The effects of physical boundary of gated communities on sense of community and fear of crime in the United Kingdom A08, Therese Kenna, Denis Linehan, Will Brady, Jonathan Hall and Matthew Williams, Gating the city: the extinguishment of public rights of way in urban Ireland
10:30-11:00 Break and Networking, Coffee & Tea served (HU407)
11:00-12:30
Track Sessions
HU400/401
A03, Federica Duca, A comparative approach to the study of gated settlements: digging inside the social and political systems of a golf estate and an open suburb in Johannesburg A04, Darren Nel and Karina Landman, A gated community is a tree; a city is not A06, Manfred Spocter, Planning and environmental agents in the non-metropolitan gated development chain in the Western Cape, South Africa
HU406 A10, Hee-Seok Kim, Emergence of Club Economy in Private Neighbourhoods and Their Enclosure - Analysis of Private Neighbourhoods in a Seoul Suburb, South Korea A05, Martina Orsini, Privatization of public space and city form A15, Tingting Lu, Everyday life and community governance of masterplanned estates: the case study of Wenzhou, China
12:30-13:00 Lunch (HU407)
14.30-18.00
Excursion to London Walkabout in More London, the Paddington Basin and Broadgate (depart on the 13:34 from Brighton Station arriving at 14:30 into London Bridge)
PROGRAMME
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
DAY 3 - FRIDAY 28 JUNE 2013
08:30
Coffee & Tea served (HU407)
9:00-11:00
Track Sessions
HU400/401 A13, Chris Guilding, Preparing strata & community title buildings for climate change A11, Guy Fayel, Gating in the Gated Community: Home Fortification Practices on Israeli Kibbutzim and Moshavim A17, Ignacio Acosta, Miss Chuquicamata, the slag: disputed mining settlement between foreign capital and national identity A07, Magda Metwally, Major Trends of the Gated Communities Development in Egypt: An Approach to urban sustainability
11:00-11:30
Break and Networking, Coffee & Tea served (HU407)
11:30-12:15
HU400/401
Closing Plenary (followed by lunch in HU406)
PROGRAMME
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Gulcin Pulat Gokmen, Ataol Ozlemnur, Ozsoy, Ahsen; Istanbul Technical University, Boundaries and Changing Urban Life in Istanbul
A01
P. Stuart Robinson; University of Tromsø, Norway, Contemporary Urban Geopolitics: The Case of ‘Occupy London’
A02
Federica Duca; Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of Trento, A comparative approach to the study of gated settlements: digging inside the social and political systems of a golf estate and an open suburb in Johannesburg.
A03
Darren Nel and Karina Landman; University of Pretoria, South Africa, A gated community is a tree; a city is not
A04
Martina Orsini, Faculty of Architecture; Polytechnic of Milan, Privatization of public space
and city form
A05
Manfred Spocter; Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Planning and environmental agents in the non-metropolitan gated development chain in the Western Cape, South Africa
A06
Magda Metwally; Housing and Building National Research Centre, Egypt, Major Trends of the Gated Communities Development in Egypt: An Approach to urban sustainability
A07
Therese Kenna, Denis Linehan, Will Brady, Jonathan Hall and Matthew Williams; University College Cork, Gating the city: the extinguishment of public rights of way in urban Ireland
A08
Gillad Rosen, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Alan R. Walks, University of
Toronto, Trends and Driving Forces in Toronto’s Condominium Development
A09
Hee-Seok Kim; Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, South Korea, Emergence of Club Economy in Private Neighbourhoods and Their Enclosure - Analysis of Private Neighbourhoods in a Seoul Suburb, South Korea
A10
Guy Fayel; University of Haifa, Gating in the Gated Community: Home Fortification Practices on Israeli Kibbutzim and Moshavim
A11
Nicole Johnston; Griffith University, Transitioning residential multi-owned developments: conflicts of Interest arising
A12
Chris Guilding; Griffith University, Preparing strata & community title buildings for climate change
A13
Veeramon Suwannasang; University College London, Quality of life & City resilience: The effects of physical boundary of gated communities on sense of community and fear of crime in the United Kingdom
A14
Tingting Lu; University College London, Everyday life and community governance of master planned estates: the case study of Wenzhou, China
A15
Samer Bagaeen; University of Brighton, The production of urban inequality: Urban gating, soft boundaries and networks of influence and affluence
A16
Ignacio Acosta; University of Brighton, Miss Chuquicamata, the slag: disputed mining settlement between foreign capital and national identity
A17
LIST OF PAPERS
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
AUTHORS AND ABSTRACTS
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A01 Gulcin Pulat Gokmen Istanbul Technical University [email protected] Ataol Ozlemnur, Pulat Gokmen, Gulcin, Ozsoy, Ahsen, Istanbul Technical University [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Boundaries and Changing Urban Life in Istanbul
Forming boundaries is a spatial function which has social conclusions. It begins
with the power of creating space and the need for shelter, and transforms with the
effects of a social phenomenon, attaining different dimensions. The concept of
borders should be examined on a broad spectrum from person to society and to the
city as space, with its multiple actors and a multi-dimensional structure.
While appearing only outside the city in ancient times, boundaries today have shifted
to deeper inside the city. Borders are now not only against threats from the outside
but also against those inside. The forming of borders stems from multiple socio-
economic and spatial factors.
Having control of communications, the boundaries generally become an urban
reality through that control. Since ancient times with their functions of defense,
spatial definition, the creation or obstruction of communications along with the
protection of order, boundaries have transformed urban space; therefore, public and
private space.
The aim of the paper: while answering the reasons and functions of boundaries, to
follow the reflection of these boundaries on physical space. In other words, to get
to the root of this social reality which extends into space, and to research its
extensions to space from an architectural perspective.
In this paper, the spatial and social functions of boundaries, along with their
concepts and types and reflections on the cities, will be examined. Also, the factors
that are involved in the transformation of boundaries, which are reflections of the
social phenomenon, will be examined. This observation will be conducted on
housing settlements
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A01 - continued Gulcin Pulat Gokmen Istanbul Technical University [email protected] Ataol Ozlemnur, Pulat Gokmen, Gulcin, Ozsoy, Ahsen, Istanbul Technical University [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Boundaries and Changing Urban Life in Istanbul - continued
The main reason why boundaries are analyzed through housing is that it is the most
familiar form of boundaries for architects. The observation will take place in Istinye,
Istanbul, which has experienced intense spatial transformation, giving proper spatial
examples for boundary examination. Boundaries are fed by socio-economic issues
and appear in different forms throughout the city. The district of Istinye, the location of
the paper's field study, was chosen because of its structure with multiple actors,
including gated communities and squatters, and different types, scales and functions
of boundaries. At the chosen location, boundary analysis will be conducted via map
reading and photography so as to better understand spatial configurations and social
patterns.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A02
P. Stuart Robinson
University of Tromsø, Norway
Contemporary Urban Geopolitics:
The Case of ‘Occupy London’
The Occupy movement is examined in relation to geographically broader and
historically deeper urban trends. The case is made for interpreting Occupy as an
initiative building upon and reacting to continuing (if not continuous) contention over
the authoritative construction and regulation of social space. This might usefully be
conceived as reflecting and engaging a deep-rooted historical struggle over the
social construction and normative architecture of putative public and private
realms. The argument is made that careful historical contextualisation of Occupy
throws into clearer relief its more novel – if not unique – attributes, that is, its
expression of a kind of new urban geopolitics. This is argued to represent a
fundamental reconfiguration of the sovereign praxis and terms of political association
of the modern nation-state.
The paper is based on comparative research into the recent development of private
securitised residential developments in the UK, a variety of countercultural social
movements of the 1990s, and the recent Occupy London movement.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A03
Federica Duca
Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of Trento
A comparative approach to the study of gated settlements: digging inside the social and political systems of a golf estate and an open suburb in Johannesburg
Gating is a widespread practice in many countries. In South Africa it is highly multifaceted and internally differentiated. Many citizens aspire to live in either townhouse complexes or in luxury estates depending on the financial possibilities. One way to understand what “difference” does it make to live in such spaces is to look at them in a comparative way. What ought to be explored would then be the differences between an open suburb and a structurally gated settlement (understood as suburb). These two different spaces should not be seen as separate entities, rather it is quite important to read them in a relational and interactive way and should be used to explore the social and the political systems that put into place.
This paper is based on ethnographic fieldwork, over a period of two years in two
suburbs of the city of Johannesburg (South Africa), namely a Golf Estate and an
open suburb. The study informs on the relevance of the comparative work in
order to grapple the main features of the gated settlements. The comparison
shows that the Golf Estate is considered to be a “new and neutral space” where a
reshuffling of identities takes place. In order to be informed on the specificity of
the gated settlement the aspects that need to be explored in order to understand
the gated system are a)the notion of community; b)the role of governing bodies
and the relationship with the state; c)the relationship between the open and the
gated suburb and the mutual perception of residents.
It will be argued that, through the direct action of a governing body (HOA) there is
a formalization and institutionalization of a culture of disengagement and that what
can be seen is a different scale of governance: on the one side an individual
private (in the open suburb where there is no structured collective organization)
and, on the other side the collective private (through the action of the HOA and
other private agencies). Yet both rely on the system of wall (be it individual or
collective) for the purpose of the well-being of the neighbourhood.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A04
Darren Nel and Karina Landman
University of Pretoria, South Africa
A gated community is a tree; a city is not
This paper builds on the seminal work of Christopher Alexander, “A city is not a
tree” and more recent work by the French architect/economist Serge Salat on
urban morphology and urban resilience. The paper will explore the urban form and
structure of a number of gated communities in the eastern part of Pretoria and
northern parts of Johannesburg in order to determine their impact on sustainable
urbanism and in particular urban resilience. The aim is to identify whether gated
communities typically resemble a tree-like structure (lattice) or leaf-like structure
(semi-lattice), with the latter being more resilient over time according to recent
studies. However, there may be additional factors influencing the transformation of
urban form and structure over time and its impact on urban resilience. These
include the nature of urban gating, the types of transitional spaces inside and
outside these developments and the activities that take place within and in the
surrounding areas. Given this, the gated neighbourhoods will be analysed
according to a number of indicators for resilience, including connectivity,
complexity, diversity, intensity and proximity. In conclusion the paper will then
consider the relationship between gated communities and urban resilience in
South Africa and reconsider the statement that a gated community is a tree while
a city is not.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A05
Martina Orsini
Faculty of Architecture, Polytechnic of Milan, Milan (Italy)
Privatization of public space and city form
The conflict between objectives and goals at the origin of many contemporary political
and economical policies of renewal and evolution of settlements lead to a progressive
erosion of the values inherent the public space. Researches and debates define a strong
awareness and critical distance about these dynamics but with surprisingly little impact
over the design activity
Objectives
Within the conflicting and unstable relationship between public and private that has
characterized the contemporary city during its definition, design found on several
occasions ideas and references from which to experience new compositions and
relations between its constituent materials, shaping the changes of the society and its
repositioning, the new and possible welfare.
In recent decades, much of the design shows an insufficient critical distance from the
increasingly pervasive dynamics of privatization of the public space able to deform, or
even remove - at all scales - the indisputable structuring values it contains.
A waiver that materializes in the immediacy of typical unstructured global spaces of which
we experience daily in our contemporary cities and territories. When this involves a public
space, it reveals not only the generalized inability to express and represent the complexity
and the variability of the contemporary society it addresses but, more critically,
contributes to the dissolution of the form of the city.
In addition, the reversal of the private sphere in the context of the public - and its opposite
- as the dominant behavior of contemporary society increases a loss of meaning in which
a certain market of collective spaces triggers deep and mutual impoverishments. In gated
communities, more than in any other form of settlement, the effects of this assumes
proportions whose consequences extend far beyond the individual urban fact. At the
physical, social and political autism of the contemporary public space overlaps a
homogeneous, repetitive and strongly defensive lifestyle able to freeze the city and the
territory into a huge lifeless collage.
Implications
It is proposed a reflection about some of the potentialities of contemporary public space
in terms of innovative coagulation and structuring powers as to be opposed the
privatization dynamics that, more than being linked to economical interests, now appear
to have become mostly cultural.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A06
Manfred Spocter
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies,
Stellenbosch University
Planning and environmental agents in the non-metropolitan
gated development chain in the Western Cape, South Africa
Gated developments have become a feature of urban living throughout the world and
have been the subject of intensive research. Gated developments are a ubiquitous
feature of the post-apartheid urban landscape with many new developments in the
form of secure estates or fortified townhouse complexes. Gated developments are not
only present in metropolitan locales, but have been increasing its presence in non-
metropolitan locales – in small towns and rural areas. The spread of non-metropolitan
gated developments in the Western Cape province have been facilitated by various
agents in the gating process. Agents include developers, local authorities, provincial
authorities, civil society, and environmental assessment practitioners. These agents
operate on various spatial scales whilst directing the gating process from various
locales. This paper investigates the roles of agents and their impacts on broader
planning processes within the non-metropolitan sphere. In the absence of an effective
regulatory environment, the potential exists for small towns and rural areas to become
new spaces of post-apartheid fortification.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A07
Magda Metwally
Housing and Building National Research Centre, Egypt
Major Trends of the Gated Communities Development in
Egypt: An Approach to urban sustainability
The phenomenon of GCs as urban residential developments is spreading all over the
world. This old/ new pattern of development was a response to the fear of crime in
urban areas in many countries, but in Egypt the moves to GCs was mainly for
enjoying a better quality of life and not for safety concern. The first instances of
exclusive communities in Egypt appeared in the late 1970s as holiday villages for elite
classes along the Mediterranean and Red Sea Coasts.
GCs in the contemporary form emerged in Egypt since the mid-1990s in the new
cities and satellites around the Greater Cairo Region (GCR) .They started to attract
the rich and upper classes to live into luxurious lifestyle communities with leisure
activities and amenities, and surrounded by gates and high walls.
New cities surrounding Cairo emerged as a perfect location for luxury communities,
situated at a special and social distance to the city .First luxurious GCs were
restricted to villas providing "new standard of residential living". Later comparatively
modest communities offered just greener, healthier and less dense environment.
A study conducted in HBRC documented the real situation of the GCs in new cities
focusing on the urban, economic and social issues. The objectives are to monitor and
evaluate the local and international experience, aiming to identify the growing trends
and transformation scenarios of GCs in Egypt. The main goal is to clarify the future
vision for decision makers in order to achieve sustainable urban policies and
development for GCs. The paper will present some results of the study with special
reference to Elsheikh Zayed new city which was planned to accommodate the low
and low-middle classes. Today GCs for upper classes are spreading very fast all over
the city, and dramatically affected the urban as well as the socio-economic
development.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A08
Therese Kenna
University College Cork, Ireland
Therese Kenna*, Denis Linehan*, Will Brady**, Jonathan Hall** and Matthew
Williams*
* Department of Geography, University College Cork
** Programme in Planning and Sustainable Development, University College
Cork
Gating the city: the extinguishment of public rights of way in
urban Ireland
The enclosure and privatization of urban space has been a growing phenomenon
internationally. In many instances, this has involved sensational and overt means of
privatisation such as the development of large-scale gated communities, or the
installation of CCTV cameras for example. Some of the less obvious gating of urban
space can go unnoticed and unchecked. The progressive gating of laneways in Irish
cities over a ten year period is the subject of this paper. In this paper we detail the
extinguishment of public rights of way in urban centres, which in the majority of
instances, has involved the closure and often gating of laneways throughout the city.
No national record exists of the extinguishment of rights of way in urban Ireland, in
spite of the very significant consequences this phenomena has had on the social
sustainability of neighbourhoods and the implications it may have in reducing the
mobility of people in local communities. This paper is based on collection and analysis
of almost 600 closures across urban Ireland in the last decade, seventy percent of
which were extinguished for reasons of ‘anti-social behaviour’. This unjust process
denies people the right to use urban laneways and thus we argue that there is a need
for planning and policy attention towards this trend.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A09
Gillad Rosen
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Alan R. Walks
University of Toronto
Trends and Driving Forces in Toronto’s Condominium
Development
The massive building efforts in Toronto Canada’s largest housing market provide an
opportunity to examine the spatial dynamics of condominium tenure and construction
over the last 40 years. This paper probes the most influential policies that fostered and
regulated condominium growth in Toronto, and explores the implications for the
continued restructuring of the city. In the context of Federal and Provincial government
withdrawal from the rental housing field and extensive funding cuts to reduce public
spending, it might seem that planning policies would have limited influence in a
context of deepening neo-liberalism. However, these seemingly weakened
governments have had a decisive role in fostering condo-development, redirecting
growth to the urban core, channelling capital investments and promoting
gentrification.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A10
Hee-Seok Kim
Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University,
South Korea
Emergence of Club Economy in Private Neighbourhoods and Their Enclosure – Analysis of Private Neighbourhoods in a Seoul Suburb, South Korea
Ubiquity of large scale apartment complexes and their undying popularity for
housing consumers are a unique urban phenomenon to South Korea. The
success of this particular residential model partly owes to private ownership of
apartments and in-complex public space including roads as the residents were
keen to better maintain apartment complexes for higher monetary value of their
properties. At the same time the private ownership of apartment complexes and
their design features such as cul-de-sac roads and walls have offered an ideal
opportunity of gating for apartment residents. The gating of Korean apartment
complexes is expressed in two major ways: introduction of exclusive amenities
and reinforced control of foot access as well as vehicular access. Despite the
ongoing gating, Korean gated community is still in its infancy because master
planned gated communities and people who actively seek to live in gated
communities are limited. However, the privatization trend of apartment complexes
will have a great impact in Korean cities due to the vast space occupied by large
scale apartment complexes. Recognition of the phenomenon and understanding
the actors behind gating are important to cope with its impact on walkability and
right to the city.
Construction and maintenance of apartment complexes involve three actors: the
State, home builders and apartment residents. They all have played different roles
in transforming apartment complexes to gated communities. The state laid out
basic conditions for the privatization of public space in apartment complexes by
creating an apartment complex system based on private ownership and
governance. The state has indirectly encouraged gating by replacing public roads
to in-complex private roads through urban renewal and maintaining laissez-faire
attitude on the internal management of apartment complexes. Home builders have
executed apartment construction drive of the State and accommodated gating
desire of housing consumers through design innovation of apartment complexes.
Since 2000’s they have offered diversified in-complex amenities reserved
exclusively for the residents to appeal for potential buyers.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A11
Guy Fayel
University of Haifa
Gating in the Gated Community: Home Fortification
Practices on Israeli Kibbutzim and Moshavim
The last few years have witnessed a rise in private home fortification practices in
moshav and kibbutz settlements in Israel. These often include enclosing the house
with tall walls and fences, installing intercom and alarm systems and CCTV
cameras, as well as posting threatening warning signs. Exclusion practices and
strategies, which constitute the most prominent characteristic of the gated
community and serve to separate members of the community from those deemed
as 'the other', are manifested not only at the level of the neighbourhood or
community but at the level of the private home. Based on ethnographic research
carried out in moshav and kibbutz settlements in Israel, I will argue that these
practices reproduce the cosmological order of the (gated) community at home and
serve to transform each house into a form of an autonomous gated community of
its own.
By examining home fortification processes as an expression of ongoing
negotiations of the boundaries of public and private space in the community, I will
attempt to discuss the agency of the built environment and the symbolic struggle
and negotiations for its character and image as a major factor influencing spatial
distribution practices and use of space, as well as cultural conceptions regarding
topics such as privacy and security. Lastly, I will argue that these processes lead to
the formation of a unique, local version of the gated community – of gating within
the gated community.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A12
Nicole Johnston
Griffith University
Transitioning residential multi-owned developments:
conflicts of interest arising
This paper aims to identify conflicts of interest arising from decisions made by
developers in the transition phase of residential multi-owned developments
(RMODs) and the consequences these conflicts have on lot owners post
transition. Although there has been research on the psychology of conflicts of
interest, there has been a paucity of research focusing on conflicts of interest in
property stakeholder relationships or on issues arising in the transition phase of
RMODs. Blandy et al (2006) explored power imbalances which exist between key
stakeholders including developers within RMODs and found that the power
exercised by developers in overseeing governance can have long-term negative
impacts on lot owners. Utilising a governance responsibilities framework, this paper
identifies, within the Australian context, developer led situations in which conflicts of
interest arise and the consequences that flow from those situations.
Thirty semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with key industry
stakeholders including developers, managers, lawyers and lot owners. A review of
court and tribunal decisions was also undertaken in order to identify the types of
conflict of interest situations that arise in legal disputes. The study has found that a
number of conflicts of interest situations arise within the RMOD context which
negatively impact upon the viability and functionality of RMODs post transition. A
common practice signifying a conflict of interest situation arises with the
engagement of an association manager by the developer pre-scheme registration.
Although legal duties are owed by the association manager to the association, the
contractual relationship caused to be entered into by the developer is compromised
when the manager is seeking future work from the developer. Negative
consequences are experienced by the association post registration as a result of
the manager’s dual relationships.
There appears to be no scholarly research which identifies the range of conflict of
interest scenarios arising in the RMOD context and the consequences that result.
This study can alert policy-makers of the consequences that can manifest when the
law is deficient with respect to preventing conflicts of interest situations arising.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A13
Chris Guilding
Griffith University
Preparing strata and community title buildings for climate
change
The findings of a 2012 Australian study that sought to inform policy making
concerned with preparing strata titled communities to deal with challenges that are
expected to result from climate change are reported. The study developed 24
recommendations designed to advance the capacity of strata titled communities to
cope with climate change.
The study’s first empirical phase involved a meeting with an eleven person industry
reference group. This group met on two subsequent occasions and represented a
valuable sounding board that informed the study’s evolution. Next, eighteen
interviews were conducted with individuals representing a range of strata title
stakeholder groups. The study’s final empirical phase involved the conduct of an
on-line questionnaire survey. This survey was designed to investigate the current
climate change preparedness of strata title communities and also to gauge the
relative merit of sixteen recommendations developed during the interview phase.
The survey was also used as an opportunity to generate further
recommendations. Following an analysis and distillation of feedback provided by
450 questionnaire respondents, eight further recommendations were developed.
The 24 recommendations advanced in the report cover a wide range of facets
relating to strata title building, living and management. The range of issues
addressed in the recommendations include factors relating to building construction
and resilience rating, improved climate change education of strata title
stakeholders, insurance, emergency management, building decision making
issues, and bank lending. The breadth of the recommendations is also evident from
the fact that they are directed to a broad range of strata title stakeholders that
include unit owners, strata managers, resident managers, state and federal
governments, insurance companies, sinking fund forecasters and banks.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A14
Veeramon Suwannasang
University College London
Quality of life and City resilience: The effects of physical boundary of gated communities on sense of community and fear of crime in the United Kingdom Quality of life is the concept that has gained a wide range of interests in recent decades.
Within this concept, sense of community (SoC hereafter) and fear of crime (FOC hereafter)
are two of the issues that highly associated with quality of life in cities, especially in terms
of their consequences and impacts. Accordingly, it is not surprising that SoC and FOC
have now captured social scientists’ attentions in many disciplines, ranging from built
environment, criminology, to psychology. Much research has endeavoured to discover
what the relationship of SoC, FOC, and built environment are; why different types of built
environment present different levels of FOC and SoC; how built environment can help
reducing FOC and increasing SoC, so that quality of life in cities be able to achieve and
cities themselves have resilience for social illness which commonly found in big
economic-driven cities.
Although much research is available on social aspect of different type of built
environment, very little information is available on the effects of physical boundary of
gated communities (hereafter GCs) and non-gated communities on SoC and FOC in the
United Kingdom. While GCs has become more obvious in British land since the last
decade of the 20th century, it has not received much attention in the United Kingdom to
the point that there is a lack of research in the effects of GCs on crime rates and GC
residents. This current research, therefore, aims to filling the void by examining the
differing effects of physical boundary on SoC and FOC between gated and non-gated
communities. In addition, the research also aims to discover the differences of SoC and
FOC in different socio-economic status (SES hereafter) communities whether SES play a
part in differing level of SoC and FOC, and in what direction.
This research adopts a group comparison, cross sectional study comparing four
community categories (high SES GCs, low SES GCs, high SES non-GCs, low SES non-
GCs) under difference socio-economic status (SES) in the South East of the United
Kingdom where a large majority of gated communities are located. Questionnaires will be
sent out to a group of random sample of each community’s participants through mail. A
brief sense of community (BSCS), actual crime rate, and perceived safety and fear of
crime are the three measures which will employ for this research.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A14 - continued
Veeramon Suwannasang
University College London
Quality of life and City resilience: The effects of physical boundary of gated communities on sense of community and fear of crime in the United Kingdom
The structure of paper will begin with Introduction, following by Literature Review,
Mythology, Case Studies, Discussions, and Conclusions. The justifications of this
current research are hoped to broaden the understanding of the effects of physical
boundary of gated and non-gated communities (in difference SES) on SoC and FOC
in the British context, and are hoped to help assisting the planning solutions for
communities in fostering SoC and reducing FOC in a national context in order to
increase quality of life of people and resilience of cities. The result of this research
can also be used as a comparative study with other countries with the hope that it
can enlighten knowledge within this field.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A15
Tingting Lu
University College London
Everyday life and community governance of master
planned estates: the case study of Wenzhou, China
Chinese suburban residential enclaves have been seen taking the form of
master planned estates, most of which are exclusively gated. From the
practice of gated communities in the Western context, the disclosure of fear,
the privatization of community, and the aesthetical consumption, constitutes
the driving forces for the development of gated communities. However, little
has been known about the development and governance of gated
communities in post-reform China. Under the processes of suburbanization,
private governance has been wildly employed in master planned estates to
maintain the inclusive social order. Based on a large-scale questionnaire
survey in Wenzhou, China, this article seeks to find the relationship between
community spatial factors, residential preferences, and attitudes toward
privatization of community governance. This article tries to argue residents
with different socio-economic status do not have same attitudes towards the
privatization of community governance. The spatial factors and the social
services provided in master planned estates significantly impact residents’
everyday life.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A16
Samer Bagaeen
University of Brighton
The production of urban inequality: Urban gating, soft
boundaries and networks of influence and affluence
Unlike political science and sociology, what the field of planning research still lacks is a regular body of literature which place power relations at its core in spite of the clear links between planning and power. According to Hayward and Swanstrom, (2011), injustice is only one manifestation of power dynamics in our cities. A parallel dynamic is outlined by Sassen in the Fourth Edition of Cities in a world economy (2012). This involves “new forms of inequality constituted into new social forms” and links with ideas of social justice and public interest, public concerns and the dominance of private interests. This paper sets out a road map to reconceptualise our understanding of these new forms and what has come to be known in the academic literature as ‘gated communities’. I lay out a template designed to explore the notion of the gated community as an identifiable transnational connector space in the same way the Ritz Hotel is a sign of privilege for global travellers.
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
A17
Ignacio Acosta
University of Brighton
Miss Chuquicamata, the slag: disputed mining settlement between foreign capital and national identity. Miss Chuquicamata is part of a larger investigation into the material legacy of the Chilean copper mining industry and its historical relationship with Britain. I use photography to document both architectural configurations and altered landscapes that are the result of the production, trade and transport of copper, mapping their circuits of exchange and post-imperial networks. I investigate the commodity as material and immaterial form, exploring the geographies of copper as scenarios for mining activity. Mining is a core activity of civilization. Local economies rely upon metal production. Chile –an extensive and narrow land emerging on the fringes of Latin America– has been the leading producer of copper since the mid nineteenth century and currently accounts for over a third of the world’s production. The paper discusses the repercussions of multinational corporations on Chilean urban design, as well as their impact in shaping the modern world economy. Chuquicamata in northern Chile was once the world’s largest known deposit of copper. The mining settlement was planned in the New York offices of the Guggenheim brothers in 1912 following patterns of other corporate towns in the U.S. Chuquicamata was the centre of a dispute over the extent of foreign ownership and capitalist control, which concluded with the nationalisation of the ‘Gran Mineria’ by Salvador Allende in 1973. High Levels of pollution forced an end to the settlement in 2007. Today, the gated town is abandoned and disappearing under the residues of the expanding mine. The architecture can be seen as enduring legacy of past colonial interventions. Through photography, I interpret the design typologies of an imported architecture as reflection of a troubled historical past. These designs carried ideas of modernisation and progress; the ruins stand as symbol for their disintegration.
NOTES
NOTES
NOTES
sbrighton.ac.uk
BRIGHTON, UK26-28 JUNE 2013CONFERENCE
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////Day 1: Wednesday 11 April 2012
Day 2: Wednesday 12 April 2012////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
School of Environment and TechnologyUniversity of BrightonCockcroft BuildingLewes RoadBrightonBN2 4GJ
brighton.ac.uk/set
PRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE
BRIGHTON, UK
CONFERENCE
GATED COMMUNITIESPRIVATE URBAN GOVERNANCE