private military companies

21
Outsourcing Security: The Rise of Private Military and Security Companies Nikolaos Tzifakis, Lecturer, Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Peloponnese

Upload: hamed-grech

Post on 19-Jul-2015

68 views

Category:

Services


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Outsourcing Security: The Rise of Private Military and Security

Companies

Nikolaos Tzifakis, Lecturer, Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Peloponnese

Growth of Private Security Sector• World Security Service Market:

• 2007: $138.6 billion

• 2009: $152.5 billion

• 2014: $218.4 billion

• World Security Service Market:• 2007: $138.6 billion

• 2009: $152.5 billion

• 2014: $218.4 billion

A very …diverse Sector • Common tasks• protection services of assets and/or people• training, restructuring and modernising of armies and

police forces; • collection and analysis of intelligence; • security of military communications; • operation of technologically advanced military systems; • military transportation and protection of strategic targets; • clearing of minefields; • language interpretation and interrogation of prisoners;• logistics

• Common tasks• protection services of assets and/or people• training, restructuring and modernising of armies and

police forces; • collection and analysis of intelligence; • security of military communications; • operation of technologically advanced military systems; • military transportation and protection of strategic targets; • clearing of minefields; • language interpretation and interrogation of prisoners;• logistics

Typology of Private Military and Security Companies

Private Security CompaniesPrivate Security Companies125 countries

657,000 employees

annual revenues:2004 - £3 billion

2011 - £7.5 billion

125 countries657,000 employees

annual revenues:2004 - £3 billion

2011 - £7.5 billion

51 countries300,000 employees

2009-2010: acquisition of 30 companies in different countries

51 countries300,000 employees

2009-2010: acquisition of 30 companies in different countries

Private Military Companies40 locations in the

United States and in several countries

more generals than the US army in its service

40 locations in the United States and in

several countries

more generals than the US army in its service

6,000 peacekeepers and trainers to 11 countries

2010: $3.4 billion (32.2% increase of annual

turnover)

6,000 peacekeepers and trainers to 11 countries

2010: $3.4 billion (32.2% increase of annual

turnover)

Typical Contract Chain in Afghanistan, Iraq

Typical Contract Chain in Afghanistan, Iraq

• Prime Contractors

• US-based subcontractors

• Recruiting countries (e.g. India)

• Companies in the location of deployment

• Prime Contractors

• US-based subcontractors

• Recruiting countries (e.g. India)

• Companies in the location of deployment

2008: 29 of the top defence contractors of the United States had at least 1,194 offshore subsidiaries.

2008: 29 of the top defence contractors of the United States had at least 1,194 offshore subsidiaries.

Types of relationships between states and PMSCs

• Contracting States

• States of Operations

• Home States

• Third States

• Contracting States

• States of Operations

• Home States

• Third States

Driving forces behind the growth of the private security market

Enabling Conditions• change in the global demand/supply of security forces• military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq• transformation of the public police and the military in

many countries

Alleged advantages of private security industry• Cutbacks to public expenditures • Professionalism, experience, specialised expertise• Innovative thought• Adaptability to new threats• Security gap

Enabling Conditions• change in the global demand/supply of security forces• military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq• transformation of the public police and the military in

many countries

Alleged advantages of private security industry• Cutbacks to public expenditures • Professionalism, experience, specialised expertise• Innovative thought• Adaptability to new threats• Security gap

Private Security contractors in Iraq Private Security contractors in Afghanistan

Security as a good

Non-excludable Excludable

Non-rival Public good Club good

Rival Common good Private good

Types of goodsTypes of goods

National security as a good

Public Providers Security is a public goodPrivate Providers Security is a public good

National security as a good

Public Providers Security is a public goodPrivate Providers Security is a public good

Sub-state or individual security as a good

Public Providers Security is a common goodPrivate Providers Security is a club good

Security is a private good

Security as a commodity: Political externalities

• It releases states from part of their responsibility to protect their citizens

• Security is gradually depoliticised• Strengthens the executive at the expense of

the legislative branch of government• PMCs an important role over the

determination of security discourses and the corresponding policies

• supply creates its own demand• security is militarized

• It releases states from part of their responsibility to protect their citizens

• Security is gradually depoliticised• Strengthens the executive at the expense of

the legislative branch of government• PMCs an important role over the

determination of security discourses and the corresponding policies

• supply creates its own demand• security is militarized

Contract management and cost efficiency

• No-bid contracts (60% of US DoD 2004)• Existence of monopolies (67% of non-competitive contracts)• ‘Cost-plus’ contracts• Poor contract oversight• US in Iraq: 34,728 contracting actions = $35.9 billion (2003- June

2011)• 1992-2006: dollar value of US army contracts increased 331% and

the number of army contract actions increased 654%• only 38% of the US Army contracting workforce deployed in theater

operations are certified for the positions held• 2009: the US GAO reviewed 69 audits of the Defense Contract Audit

Agency and found that in 65 of them there were serious ‘deficiencies that rendered them unreliable’

• Outsourcing contract oversight or self-evaluation• No disruption in the supply of services• 2004 KBR contract in Iraq, expenses of over $1 billion

• No-bid contracts (60% of US DoD 2004)• Existence of monopolies (67% of non-competitive contracts)• ‘Cost-plus’ contracts• Poor contract oversight• US in Iraq: 34,728 contracting actions = $35.9 billion (2003- June

2011)• 1992-2006: dollar value of US army contracts increased 331% and

the number of army contract actions increased 654%• only 38% of the US Army contracting workforce deployed in theater

operations are certified for the positions held• 2009: the US GAO reviewed 69 audits of the Defense Contract Audit

Agency and found that in 65 of them there were serious ‘deficiencies that rendered them unreliable’

• Outsourcing contract oversight or self-evaluation• No disruption in the supply of services• 2004 KBR contract in Iraq, expenses of over $1 billion

Frauds, wastes, abuses, mismanagements

• the US DoD Inspector General: US paid $160 to $204 million more for the supply of fuel in Iraq.

• Supreme Foodservice charged the US with $454.9 million to airlift fresh fruit and vegetables in Afghanistan (not required in the contract)

• Blackwater billed the US State Department with the salary cost of a prostitute in Kabul

• Airscan utilized unencrypted commercial television relays from 2001 to 2002 to transmit U.S. military intelligence data in Kosovo

• ‘Federal Contractor Misconduct Database’ …893 instances of misconduct collectively amounting to more than $40 billion

• the US DoD Inspector General: US paid $160 to $204 million more for the supply of fuel in Iraq.

• Supreme Foodservice charged the US with $454.9 million to airlift fresh fruit and vegetables in Afghanistan (not required in the contract)

• Blackwater billed the US State Department with the salary cost of a prostitute in Kabul

• Airscan utilized unencrypted commercial television relays from 2001 to 2002 to transmit U.S. military intelligence data in Kosovo

• ‘Federal Contractor Misconduct Database’ …893 instances of misconduct collectively amounting to more than $40 billion

Illegitimate violence, human rights and impunity

From Blackwater to …Xe

In search of norms and regulations• 1977 Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions• International Convention against the Recruitment, Use,

Financing and Training of Mercenaries• IHL: combatants and civilians• Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for

Internationally Wrongful Acts• Draft of a possible Convention on Private Military and

Security Companies• Montreux Document• International Code of Conduct for Private Security

Service Providers

• 1977 Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions• International Convention against the Recruitment, Use,

Financing and Training of Mercenaries• IHL: combatants and civilians• Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for

Internationally Wrongful Acts• Draft of a possible Convention on Private Military and

Security Companies• Montreux Document• International Code of Conduct for Private Security

Service Providers

Conclusions – Policy recommendations

• Prevent supply from determining its own demand;• launch competitive bids for every single contract;• refrain from awarding cost-plus contracts; • avoid outsourcing services to monopolies;• increasing the capacity and authority of oversight institutions;

• evade transferring contract supervision to private agencies;• calculate the cost of contract management; • regulate the operation of PMSCs;• reverse the climate of general impunity;• explicitly stipulate the responsibility of prime contractors;• exclude from future contracts seriously misbehaving PMSCs.

• Prevent supply from determining its own demand;• launch competitive bids for every single contract;• refrain from awarding cost-plus contracts; • avoid outsourcing services to monopolies;• increasing the capacity and authority of oversight institutions;

• evade transferring contract supervision to private agencies;• calculate the cost of contract management; • regulate the operation of PMSCs;• reverse the climate of general impunity;• explicitly stipulate the responsibility of prime contractors;• exclude from future contracts seriously misbehaving PMSCs.