prioritizing tiered support to schools 2012-2013
DESCRIPTION
Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013. 26 s chools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
PRIORITIZING TIERED SUPPORT TO SCHOOLS
2012-2013
Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz
2
Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools2012-2013
26 schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office
All Other Designations
Non-SIG Schools within ETO
assigned to ETO Office
SIG Schools
40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools; supported by the Education Transformation Office
“A”, “B”, and “C” schools that have demonstrated consistent improvement; supported generally by the district through region offices
3
Evolution of:The Education Transformation Office
2010-11 19 schools selected as “persistently lowest-achieving” 6 elementary schools; 3 middle schools; 10 high schools. 14 million dollars for each of the next three years through School Improvement Grant (SIG)2011-12 Expanded to 26 schools in year two. Added 3 elementary and
4 middle schools. Additional 6 million dollars. 2012-13 Expanded to 66 schools in year three. Added 27 elementary,
11 middle and 2 senior high schools for a total of 36 elementary, 18 middle and 12 senior high schools.
4
Aligned and Structured Support
Education Transformation
Office
SIG Schools Persistently Low-Achieving schools receive additional funding from School Improvement Grant• 10 high schools• 7 middle schools• 9 elementary schools
Non-SIG Schools 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools receive additional funding through District Title I• 2 high schools• 11 middle schools• 27 elementary schools
5
Criteria for Placement in ETO SIG Schools
26 schools Schools identified by the state as being in the “Lowest 100
Performing Elementary Schools” 10 Schools
Schools that received a “D” or “F” grade in 2012 28 Schools
Schools that received a “C” grade in 2012 but would have received a “D” if not held harmless by the state
4 Schools Fragile “C” Schools that earned a “D” in at least one of the three
previous years 18 Schools
Vulnerable schools that would have dropped 2 letter grades but were held harmless for 2012-2013
7 Schools
6
Develop Instructional
Leaders
Improve Teacher Quality
Strengthen Parent &
Community Involvement
Expand Wraparound Services for
Students
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
4 Pillars of Support
7
Improve Teacher Quality
Recruit/Retain High Performing Educators• Recruitment Fairs • Teach for America• University
Partnerships
Mathematics, Reading, and Science Instructional CoachesEach school will be allocated at least: • 1 reading coach• 1 math coach• 1 science coach
Job-Embedded Professional Development with Problem-Solving Focus• Common Planning• Lesson Study• iCADS• Aligned Support• Coaching Academy• Teacher Academy
Innovative Instructional Resources and Strategies• Differentiated
Instruction• Gradual Release• Instructional
Frameworks
8
Develop Instructional
Leaders
Assign administrators to departments and
grade levels
Include assistant principals in all
instructional coaches’ training to build instructional
capacity and ensure alignment
and iCADs
Implement internship process for future principals
and assistant principals through
Project Lead Strong and Florida Turnaround Leadership
Program
Conduct instructional rounds with
principals and focus on best practices and
instructional rigor
Create network of APs and Principals
9
Crea
tion
of
four
par
ent
advo
cacy
ce
nter
s
Focus on
Parent
Academy
classes
Expansion
of PTA
enrollment
Expand days/times for parent-
teacher conferences
ETO Task ForceVisibility
Executive
PASS: CEO
and
Principal
Partnership
Strengthen Parent &
Community Involvement
10
Positive Behavior
Support (PBS)• Positive
Reinforcement• Appropriate
Social Behaviors• Improve School
Climate and Student Behavior
Academic Interventions
• City Year• Saturday
Academy• Spring Break
Academy• Before/After-
School Tutoring
Enrichment Opportunities
• Dual-Enrollment• Advanced
Academics• CTE• IB Programs• College Summit
Mentoring and Outreach Programs
• City Year• Big Brothers/Big
Sisters• Diplomas Now• Communities in
Schools
Expand Wraparound Services for
Students
11
Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools2012-2013
26 schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office
All Other Designations
Non-SIG Schools within ETO
assigned to ETO Office
SIG Schools
40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools; supported by the Education Transformation Office
“A”, “B”, and “C” schools that have demonstrated consistent improvement; supported generally by the district through region offices
• Develop district pacing guides to ensure instructional coherence and consistency across schools
• Provide ongoing communication and support to core content area department heads
• Provide information and support to region superintendents and their schools as new End of Course exams come on-line (i.e. Civics, U.S. History)
• Use Florida Continuous Improvement Model process to review data and identify Target and Focus schools
• Provide additional support to ETO schools as needed• Serve as lead on the transition to full Common Core State
Standards (CCSS) implementation
12
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT