presentation week 1 final

Upload: naidadm5732

Post on 04-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    1/37

    Global Issues: Challenges of

    Globalization

    Week 1

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    2/37

    From International Relations

    to Global IssuesInternational Relations

    - is essentially concerned with interaction

    among worlds state governments and actors

    -modern state began in Europe in 1648 in thePeace of Westphalia which ended the ThirtyYears War

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    3/37

    From International Relations

    to Global Issues- States and nations are used interchangeably;

    they are not exactly the same

    a) a state is a legal and political unit that mustbe internationally recognized, be politicallyorganized, and be a populated geographic areathat has sovereignty

    Note:sovereignty is the ability of the state to be independent from thecontrol of another state

    All states have ideologies (=system of values, beliefs and ideas)

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    4/37

    b) nation, meanwhile, speaks of a groupof people who have strong emotional,

    cultural, linguistic, religious andhistorical ties

    - Scholars and practitioners in

    international relations prefer to usenation-state

    From International Relations

    to Global Issues

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    5/37

    From International Relations

    to Global Issues- International relations generally would like

    to answer three questions

    a) contexts in which states operates; howthese contexts shape or influence thedecisions governments make

    b) major objectives of states and ininternational politics

    c) Explanations as to the choices of the

    states

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    6/37

    From International Relations

    to Global Issues-at the heart of those questions lies the

    concept of powerpower is the ability to get others to do things they wouldordinarily do or to behave in ways they would prefer to avoid

    - Core understanding of internationalrelations is the view of power struggleamong countriesState-centric model emphasizes that states as the dominant,almost exclusive actor in world politics

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    7/37

    Core Principles

    IR revolves around one key problem:

    How can a groupsuch as two or more nations

    serve its collectiveinterests when doing sorequires its members to forego their individualinterests?

    Example: Problem of global warming. Solving it can onlybe achieved by many countries acting together.

    Collective goods problem

    The problem of how to provide something that benefitsall members of a group regardless of what each membercontributes to it

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    8/37

    Core Principles

    In general, collective goods are easier toprovide in small groups than large ones.

    Small group: defection (free riding) is harder toconceal and has a greater impact on the overallcollective good, and is easier to punish.

    Collective goods problem occurs in all groups

    and societies Particularly acute in international affairs

    No central authority such as a world government toenforce on individual nations the necessary measures to

    provide for the common good

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    9/37

    Core Principles

    Three basic principles offer possiblesolutions for this core problem of

    getting individuals to cooperate for thecommon good without a centralauthority to make them do so.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    10/37

    Dominance Solves the collective goods problem by establishing a

    power hierarchy in which those at the top controlthose below Status hierarchy

    Symbolic acts of submission and dominance reinforce thehierarchy.

    Hegemon/superpower

    The advantage of the dominance solution Forces members of a group to contribute to the common

    good

    Minimizes open conflict within the group Disadvantage of the dominance solution

    Stability comes at a cost of constant oppression of, andresentment by, the lower-ranking members of the statushierarchy.

    Conflicts over position can sometimes harm the groups

    stability and well-being.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    11/37

    Reciprocity Solves the collective goods problem by

    rewarding behavior that contributes to thegroup and punishing behavior that pursues

    self-interest at the cost of the group Easy to understand and can be enforced without

    any central authority

    Positive and negative reciprocity

    Disadvantage: It can lead to a downward spiral aseach side punishes what it believes to be thenegative acts of the other. Generally people overestimate their own good intentions

    and underestimate those of opponents or rivals.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    12/37

    Identity Identity principle does not rely on self-

    interest.

    Members of an identity community care about

    the interests of others in the communityenough to sacrifice their own interests tobenefit others.

    Family, extended family, kinship group roots

    In IR, identity communities play importantroles in overcoming difficult collective goodsproblems.

    Nonstate actors also rely on identity politics.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    13/37

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    14/37

    IR as a Field of Study Practical discipline Theoretical debates are fundamental, but unresolved. IR is about international politics, but the field is

    interdisciplinary: relates to economics, history,sociology, and others Usually taught within political science classes Domestic politics of foreign countries, although overlapping

    with IR, generally make up the separate field of comparativepolitics.

    Issue areas: global trade, the environment, etc. Conflict and cooperation mix in relationships among

    nations Subfields

    International security studies

    International political economy (IPE)

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    15/37

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    16/37

    Pluralism andInterdependence

    -the transition from traditional internationalto global issues is based on the theory of

    pluralism and interdependence- Its main concern is how human activities

    are intertwined and interconnected

    - The theory takes into consideration thenonstate actors

    Note: nonstate actors are organizations that are not formally

    associated with governments and play a crucial role in international

    agenda

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    17/37

    Pluralism and Interdependence

    - In an increasing global society, humansecurity is strengthened

    human security deals with everyday challenges humans face that

    involve military issues

    - Human security focuses on 7 aspects Economic security

    Food security

    Health security Environmental security

    Personal security

    Community security

    Political security

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    18/37

    Pluralism andInterdependence

    - Global issues tackle the new period ininternational relations or post-international

    politics- Global issues indicates how globalization

    intertwines many aspects of human

    activities and how essential it is to adoptan interdisciplinary approach in order tounderstand our world and its impact in our

    lives

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    19/37

    State Actors

    Most important actors in IR are states.

    State: A territorial entity controlled by

    a government and inhabited by apopulation. State government exercises sovereignty

    over its territory.

    Recognized as sovereign by other states Population forms a civil society; group

    identity

    Seat of government with a leaderheadof government or head of state

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    20/37

    State Actors

    The international system: Set of relationships among the worlds states, structured

    according to certain rules and patterns of interaction. Modern international system has existed for less than 500

    years. Nation-states Major source of conflict: Frequent mismatch between

    perceived nations and actual borders. Populations vary dramatically.

    Great variation in terms of the size of states total annualeconomic activity Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

    Great powers Most powerful of these states are called superpowers

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    21/37

    Figure 1.1

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    22/37

    State Actors Not formally recognizedas states

    Taiwan: operatesindependently but claimedby China

    Formal colonies and

    possessions: Puerto Rico(U.S), Bermuda (British),Martinique (French),French Guiana, theNetherlands Antilles(Dutch), the Falkland

    Islands (British), and Guam(U.S.) Hong Kong (reverted from

    British to Chinese rule) The Vatican (Holy See)

    ambiguous status

    Including various suchterritorial entities withstates brings the worldtotal to about 200 stateor quasi-state actors.

    Other would-be states: Kurdistan (Iraq), Abkhazia

    (Georgia), and Somaliland(Somalia) may fully controlthe territory they claim butare not internationallyrecognized

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    23/37

    Nonstate Actors State actors are strongly influenced

    by a variety of nonstate actors.

    Called transnational actors when theyoperate across international borders

    Intergovernmental organizations

    (IGOs) Examples: OPEC, WTO, African Union,

    UN

    Vary in size from a few states to thewhole UN membership

    Nongovernmental organizations(NGOs) Private organizations; no single

    pattern

    Examples: Amnesty International, RedCross

    NGO, House of Peace

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    24/37

    Nonstate Actors

    Multinational corporations Companies that span multiple countries

    Substate actors Exist within one country but either influence that

    countrys foreign policy or operate internationally,or both

    Example: State of Ohio (entirely a U.S. entity)

    operates an International Trade Division

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    25/37

    Table 1.2

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    26/37

    Levels of Analysis Many actors involved in IR

    Leads to complexity of competing explanations and theories

    Response: IR scholars sorted out the influences,actors, and processes, and categorize them intodifferent levels of analysis Perspective on IR based on a set of similar actors or

    processes that suggests possible explanations to whyquestions

    Individual, domestic(state or societal), interstate,globallevels of analysis

    Example of applying different levels of analysis War in Iraq

    No correct level for a given why question. Levels of analysis help suggest multiple explanations

    and approaches to consider in trying to explain an

    event.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    27/37

    Table 1.3

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    28/37

    Interdependence andglobalization

    Interdependence- a political andeconomic situation in which two states

    are simultaneously dependent on eachother for well-being

    Globalizationthe integration of markets,politics, values and environmentalconcerns across borders

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    29/37

    Periods of globalizationFirst wave of globalization is as old as human civilization

    Second wave of globalization is associated with the Europeanconquest of Asia, Latin America and Africa

    Third wave of globalization which began in 1870 and declinedaround 1914 was marked by breakthrough in technologicaldevelopments, global production of primary commodities and massmigration; 1914-1945

    Fourth wave of globalization was from 1945 to 1980 spurred by

    retreat of nationalism and protectionism and the strengthening ofinternationalism and global cooperation, led by U.S.

    Fifth wave of globalization is the current period characterized byunprecedented interdependence among nations and the powerfulnonstate actors

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    30/37

    Causes of Globalization

    Natural desire of man

    Revolutions in transportation

    Financial market integration

    Advances in military and medicaltechnology

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    31/37

    Forms of globalization

    Economic and trade globalization

    Financial globalization

    Political globalization

    Military globalization

    Cultural globalization

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    32/37

    Resistance to globalization

    Mainly coming from U.S.A. and France

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    33/37

    Globalization Globalization: Three conceptions of/schools of

    thought on this process compete.1. Globalization as the fruition of liberal economic

    principles/global marketplace

    2. Perspective characterized by skepticism: Worlds majoreconomies are more integrated today than before WWI.North-South divide increasing with globalization; distinctand rival regional blocs; fragmenting of larger units intosmaller ones

    3. Globalization as more profound than the skeptics believe,yet more uncertain than the view of supporters of liberaleconomics.

    Globalization is changing both international securityand IPE, but IPE more quickly and profoundly.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    34/37

    Figure 1.2

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    35/37

    Table 1.5

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    36/37

    Myths/Debates(?) globalization(1) Downward pressure on wages

    - a more significant factor is technology

    (2) The race to the bottom- Globalization has not caused the worlds multinational corporations to simply scour the globe in

    search of the lowest-paid laborers.

    (3) Globalization is irreversible-In the long run, globalization is likely to be an unrelenting phenomenon. But for significant periods of

    time, its momentum can be hindered by a variety of factors, ranging from political will to availability ofinfrastructure

    (4) Openness to globalization will, on its own, deliver economicgrowth

    - Integrating with the global economy is, as economists like to say, anecessary, but not sufficient, condition for economic growth.

    (5) The shrinking state

    -Technologies that facilitate communication and commerce have curbedthe power of some despots throughout the world, but in a globalizedworld governments take on new importance in one critical respect,namely, setting, and enforcing, rules with respect to contracts andproperty rights.

  • 8/13/2019 Presentation Week 1 Final

    37/37

    Global Issues: Challenges of

    Globalization

    Week 1