presentation (meeting 3)

34
Oct. 25, 2016 Start/End Times Task Force Engaging stakeholders in Next Generation EPS

Upload: ngokhuong

Post on 04-Feb-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Oct. 25, 2016

Start/End Times Task Force

Engaging stakeholders in Next Generation EPS

Page 2: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Agenda● Data review

● Options assessment

● Values assessment

● Preview next steps

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 3: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Start/End Times Task Force ChargeAligning resources for Next Generation learning

● Analyze pertinent information and consider options for school start/end at the elementary and middle school levels

● Advise administration on ways to meet educational needs of learners and align resources with mission, vision and strategic priorities

● Explore and develop start/end time options for administration, with assessed benefits and challenges for each, for implementation in 2017-18

● SCHOOL BOARD GUIDING PARAMETERS

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 4: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Task Force Meeting NormsStakeholder Engagement through partnership

● Respect schedules

● Work toward common good

● Pay attention to self and others

● Assume positive intent

● Be open to new ideas

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 5: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Data Review

Additional information for consideration

Page 6: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Safe Routes to School PlanCommunity recommendations (2012)

● City improvement recommendations

● School district improvement recommendations

● Joint City/District improvements

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 7: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Additional requested dataBreakfasts served

Oct. 25, 2016

SCHOOL 2014-15 2015-16

EHS 4,585 8,025

SVMS 4,547 3,478

VVMS 3,926 3,513

Concord 4,541 5,429

Cornelia 4,014 11,509

Countryside 5,510 15,414

Creek Valley 4,472 4,369

Highlands 822 1,835

Normandale 2,236 12,806

● Variables○ Breakfast in Classrooms (BIC)

■ CN, CS (spring 2015)■ ND (fall 2015)

○ KIDS Club (fall 2015)○ Grab n’ Go

■ CC (spring 2013)■ CS (fall 2015)

● Analysis○ All showed increases, most w/ BIC ○ Kgtn state funded breakfasts

(fall 2015)

Page 8: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Additional requested dataSchool-Age Care Program Options

● Out of School Time Program (OST) ○ Elementary - would continue with before & after school care at all

sites○ MS - few districts offer before school option, but CES open to

exploring if sufficient space and enrollment interest

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 9: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Additional requested dataMiddle School Activities

Oct. 25, 2016

● Varying start times in other districts, scheduling competitions already a challenge

● With 9th grade move to EHS, many scheduling conflicts reduced

○ Grade 7-8 participants in HS sports may have to leave school early

● Not all districts compete at MS level, many offer intramurals

● Comparison of MS start times and impact on activities

Page 10: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Current Operations (REVIEW)Transportation Services

Oct. 25, 2016

TIER SCHOOL Spec Ed Full Size

Tier 1 SVMS 8 21

VVMS Immersion

2 147

Other 1 1

Tier 1.5 Success Ctr 1 5

Tier 2 EHS 6 12

Normandale /OLG

0 20

Concord 4 10

Other 1 1

TIER SCHOOL Spec Ed Full Size

Tier 2.5 (PM) ECSE 9 0

Tier 3 Cornelia 4 7

Countryside 1 7(reg) /4(CP)

Creek Valley 2 9

Highlands 2 4(reg) / 5(CP)

HS Special 1 1

Other 1 5

Tier 4.5 (AM) ECSE 9 0

Page 11: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Alternative Walking Distances

Oct. 4, 2016

Impacts by school

Page 12: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 13: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 14: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 15: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 16: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 17: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 18: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 19: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 20: Presentation (Meeting 3)
Page 21: Presentation (Meeting 3)

ANY QUESTIONS?

Page 22: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Transportation Options

Creating shared understanding

Page 23: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Current Operations (REVIEW)Start / End Times

● Tier 1 ○ Valley View & South View Middle School

● Tier 2 ○ Edina High School (8:25 a.m. - 3:10 p.m.) ○ Normandale & Concord Elementary (8:30 a.m. - 3:05 p.m.)○ Non-Public Schools

● Tier 3 ○ Cornelia, Creek Valley, Countryside & Highlands Elementary

(9:15 a.m. - 3:50 p.m.)

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 24: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Current Operations (REVIEW)Length of School Day

● Elementary - 6 hours, 35 minutes○ Early Start - 8:30 a.m. - 3:05 p.m. ○ Late Start - 9:15 a.m. - 3:50 p.m.

● Middle School - 7 hours○ South View MS & Valley View MS - 7:40 a.m. - 2:40 p.m.

● High School - 6 hours, 45 minutes○ EHS - 8:25 a.m. - 3:10 p.m.

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 25: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Current Operations (REVIEW)EPS Transportation Services● Average Route information (length, stops)

○ EHS - 40 minutes, 28 stops○ MS - 25 minutes, 15 stops○ Elem (neighborhood) - 25 minutes, 16 stops○ Elem (choice) - 40 minutes, 21 stops

● Additional routes ○ EPS:

■ Early Childhood, Success Programs (am/pm), Wise Guys shuttle (am/pm)■ Field Trips & Extra-Curricular Activities■ Contracted Services - Special Education, Integration

○ Non-EPS: ■ Groves, OLG, Calvin Christian, Golden Years, Hopkins Public Schools

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 26: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Preliminary Route Options (DRAFT)

Oct. 4, 2016

OPTION Tiers Structure

Option 1 3 Current model, but with 9th grade moving to EHS, need to add 10 buses

Option 2 3 Current model, but with extra capacity at MS, move one elem (e.g. CC) to Tier 1

Option 3 3 Move MS to Tier 3, keep HS & ND in Tier 2, move one elem from Tier 2 to Tier 3 (e.g. CC), other elem in Tier 1

Option 4 3 All elem (except ND) in Tier 1, HS & ND Tier 2, MS Tier 3

Option 5 2 All elem in Tier 1, MS and HS in Tier 2

Option 6 4 Elem in Tiers 1-3, HS in Tier 3, MS in Tier 4

Option 7 4 (split)? 8:15 - CC, CN, CV / 8:25 - EHS8:45 - SVMS, VVMS / 9:15 - ND, OLG, HL, CS

Option 8 3 Tier 1 - Elementary (except ND, CC)Tier 2- ND, OLG, SV, CCTier 3 - VV, EHS

Page 27: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Options Assessment

● Assess each presented option (group placement)● Identify modifications to advance● What other options should be explored?

Oct. 25, 2016

Task Force Engagement

Assessing current and possible options

Page 28: Presentation (Meeting 3)

ANY QUESTIONS?

Page 29: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Values Assessment

Balancing Competing Priorities

Page 30: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Values Assessment

● Review list of shared values● What else should we be included?● Rank values for future options development

Oct. 25, 2016

Task Force Engagement

What do we prioritize?

Page 31: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Next Steps

Reaching consensus

Page 32: Presentation (Meeting 3)

Step 1 Step 3Step 2 Step 4

Task Force ProgressFinalizing Options for Administrative Review

Review best practice data (sleep and student achievement)

Review current options (transportation, survey)

Explore options and prioritize values

Evaluate options, reach consensus

Oct. 25, 2016

Page 33: Presentation (Meeting 3)

1

2

3

4

Next StepsAdvancing Options into Implementation for 2017-18

● Task Force reviews current data, best practice● Identifies Options for Administration

● Administration reviews/refines Task Force options ● Options presented to School Board for review

● Community input on proposed options● Board approves final option

Oct. 25, 2016

● School Board approves Guiding Parameters for 2017-18 School Start/End Times● Establishes Community Task Force

Page 34: Presentation (Meeting 3)

ANY QUESTIONS?