presbyacusis - aspekter avseende epidemiologi och kognition
TRANSCRIPT
Ulf Rosenhall
Presbyacusis – aspekter avseende
epidemiologi och kognition
Hur hör vi i Sverige?
2 epidemiologiska us.
Kvinnor och män, 20 till
90 år gamla
0
20
40
60
80
100
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8
kHz
90
85
80
75
70
70
60
50
40
30
20
Men, 20 - 90 years
Johan sson &Arlinger, 2002L,R
Jönsson &Rosenhall,1998a,b, L
0
20
40
60
80
100
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8
kHz
90
85
80
75
70
70
60
50
40
30
20
Johan sson &Arlinger, 2002L,R
Jönsson &Rosenhall,1998a,b, L
Women, 20-90 years
Åldershörselnedsättning
Presbyacusis
Age-related hearing loss
ARHL el. ARHI
Förekomst?
Orsaker?
Åtgärder?
Jönsson & Rosenhall 1998
Hederstierna et al, 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8
kHz
Women, 70 - 90 yLeft ear
0
20
40
60
80
100
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8
kHz
90
88
85
81
79
75
70
Men, 70 - 90 yLeft ear
Rudin et al, 1988
Pedersen et al, 1989
50
60
Women, 51.3 y Men, 50 – 60 y
Three Swedish Epidemiological Studies
1)The Gerontological and Geriatric Population Study in Gothenburg: H70 (1971-2005)
2) The Study of Men born in 1913 and 1923 (1973)
3) Health and Psychosocial Work Conditions in Middle Aged Women (2005)
1
1
2
3
Men and women, 70 - 80 y
5 epidemiological studies
from Europe and USA
Unscreened populations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Engdahl et al. 2005
Cruickshanks et al . 1998
Jönsson & Rosenhal l 1998
Davi s 1995
Gates et al . 1990
Women, L ear, 70-80/75 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Engdahl et al . 2005
Cruickshanks et al. 1998
Jönsson & Rosenhall 1998
Davi s 1995
Gates et al. 1990
Men, L ear, 70-80/75 years
Remarkable good
agreement between
different studies
from developed
countries
Men and women, 80 - 90 y
6 epidemiological studies
from Europe and USA
Unscreened populations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
dB
HL
0 .25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Engdahl et a. 2005
Hietanen et al. 2004
Cruickshanks et al. 1998
Jönsson & Rosenhall 1998
Parving et al. 1997
Gates et al. 1990
Men, L/B ear, 80-90/85 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Engdahl et al. 2005
Hietanen et al. 2004
Cruickshanks et al. 1998
Jönsson & Rosenhal l 1998
Parving et al . 1997
Gates et al . 1990
Women, L/B ear, 80-90/85 years
The prevalence of child and adult
hearing impairment is substantially
higher in middle- and low-income
countries than in high-income
countries, demonstrating
the global need for attention to
hearing impairment
Stevens et al, 2013
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
dB
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Ge nder Di ffe re nce , 70-80 years
Cruickshanks et al. 1998
Jönsson & Rosenhall 1998
Davis 1995
Pearson et al. 1995
Gates et al. 1990
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
dB
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Ge nder Di ffe re nce, 80-90 ye ars
Hietanen et al. 2004
Cruickshanks et al . 1998
Jönsson & Rosenhall 1998
Parving et al. 1997
Pearson et al . 1995
Gates et al . 1990
Gender differences
70 - 80 y, 80 - 90 y
Hörselskadade i Sverige
Självskattad hörselnedsättning >1 milj.
(HRF/SCB)
Beräknat antal med HNS enligt tonaudiometri
Svår HNS – dövhet ~130 000
Måttlig HNS (M4: 40-64 dB): >0,5 milj.
Lätt HNS (M4: 20-39 dB): ~1,4 milj.
Totalt: >2 milj.
20-70 år 70+
1/3 2/3
2/3 1/3
Beräkning 2014
Antal svenskar med hörselnedsättning (tusental)
Lätt Måttlig – svår
M4 20-39 dB M4 ≥40 dB
0 – 20 år 43t 5t
20 - 50 år 229t 45t
51 – 70 år 629t 161t
>70 år 474t 430t
Sveriges befolkning 31/12 2013
Sveriges befolkning 31/12 2013
Sveriges befolkning 31/12 2013
Ålder, år Beräknat behov,
Hörselrehab
60 ~ 5%
70 10 – 20%
80 40 – 45%
90 60 – 70%
Andel av befolkningen i Sverige 2009 2015 2060
65+ 15% 17% 25%
80+ 4% 9%
65+ 2,7 milj. 2060
50y
60y
70y
80y
90y
PTA
<20 dB
PTA
<20 dB
PTA
20-39 dB
PTA
20-39 dB
PTA
+40 dB
Men 50+ 1.6 m Women 50+ 1.8 m
Sweden 2006
+70 y
More women than
men have hearing
loss
Vad händer med hörseln på lång sikt?
Är hörseln konstant?
Försämras hörseln?
Förbättras hörseln?
WHO 2002 - 2030
DALYs (Disability-Adjusted Life Years)
Adult onset hearing loss: 2002 ranking # 13 globally
Year 2030 estimated ranking # 9 (2.5 DALYs)
High-income countries # 7 (4,1 DALYs)
Middle-income countries # 9 (2,9 DALYs)
Low-income countries < #10
Mathers & Loncar, 2006
Ökar eller minskar incidensen av hörselproblem?
Den pessimistiska synen:
Hörselproblemen ökar globalt
The pessimistic view
11.7
11.3%
10.8%
10.2%
9.9%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Per
cen
t
84-8
5
86-8
7
88-8
9
90-9
1
92-9
3
94-9
5
96-9
7
98-9
9
00-0
1
02-0
320
0420
05
Year
Self-assessed hearing loss 1984 - 2005 Statistics Sweden, SCB
Total
Men
Women10.5 %
14 %
Marke Trak VIII Kochkin, 2005
Increases in prevalence of hearing loss in adolescents from
15% to 19.5% from 1988–1994 to 2005–2006
NHANES Shargorodsky et al, 2010
In the Alameda County Study prevalence rates of self-reported
trouble with hearing nearly doubled from 1965 to 1994
Wallhagen et al, 1997
Prevention
NIHL – prevention
Vaccination programmes
ARHL – life-style factors
The optimistic view
”Americans hear as well or better
today compared with 40 years ago”
NHANES, NHES Hoffman et al, 2010
Persons from later birth cohorts had lower
prevalences of hearing impairment than those
from earlier birth cohorts
Beaver Dam Study, EHLS Zhan et al, 2010
Men 75 Right Ear
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0,25 0,5 1 2 4 6 8
kHz
dB HL
1RE
2RE
4RE
6RE
Women 75 Right Ear
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0,25 0,5 1 2 4 6 8
kHz
dB HL
1RE
2RE
4RE
6RE
75-year olds over three decades: No audiometric changes
The Gerontological and Geriatric Population
Study in Gothenburg, Sweden Rosenhall et al, 2013
The optimistic view
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1995 2000 2005
Pre
va
len
ce
, %
Year
Prevalence any threshold >= 25 dB HL any ear 3,4 or 6 kHz
HNS-prevalens 3 - 6 kHz, något öra,
1971 – 2005
18-åriga mönstrande svenska män
Förändras hörseln från generation till generation?
Både bättre och sämre
(men mest bättre)
Muhr et al, 2016
Lätt, måttlig och svår HNS i diskantområdet
1971 – 2004 (-2010), ett eller båda öronen
18-åriga mönstrande svenska män
Histopathology of ARHL
Cochlear degeneration
• OHC degeneration in basal and apical coil
• IHC degeneration in basal coil
• Strial degeneration
• Alterations and derangement of hair bundles
• Intracellular inclusions
Types of ARHL
1
1) Sensory
2
2) Neural 3
3) Strial (metabolic)
4 4) Cochlear conductive
5) Mixed
6) Indeterminate
Schuknecht & Gacek, 1993
hypothetical
uncommon, <1%
PARAN Gates et al, 2000
Engström et al. 1987
Woman 75 y
Man 74 y
Sensory type
Schuknecht’s classification
Strial type
Schuknecht, 1994
A reduction in the EP is presumed
Presbyacusis Woman 67 y
Presbyacusis Woman 83 y
Strial (metabolic) type
Schuknecht’s classification
Gates & Mills, 2005
Engström et al. 1987
Presbyacusis Man 73 y
Mixed: sensory + strial types
Age, Cohort, and Period Effects
Causes of ARHL
Intrinsic causes – Age, Cohort Effects
Biological ageing
Biological ageing is probably only a minor
contributor to ARHL of ”younger elderly people”,
but increases in importance in advanced age, 80+
Telomeres?
Genetic factors
Important contributors to ARHL
Mutation in mtDNA
The 4,977-bp deletion
Bai et al, 1997; Ueda et al, 1998
Genetic influences of ARHL in man
• ARHL has a multifactorial aetiology
• Familial aggregations occur for sensory and strial ARHL
phenotypes
• Heritability: 35-55% (sensory type)
• The heritability estimate was greater for the strial than the sensory
phenotypes
• Women: Genetic effect on ARHL
• Men: Mixed, genetically/aquired ARHL
Gates et al, 1999
• Candidate genes in man:
10q26, 11q13.5, 11q25 (DFNB20), 11p, 14q, 18q
KCNQ4, DFNA18
DeStefano et al, 2003; Fransen et al, 2003;
Garringer et al, 2006; van Eyken et al, 2006; a.o.
Genetics and ARHL – Twin Studies
Audiometric Study of Male Twins
Variation in high frequency hearing is related
to genetic and extrinsic factor. Heritability: 47%, 64+ years, men
The environmental effect becomes more important with age
Karlsson et al, 1997
Danish Twin Registry
Heritability for self-reported hearing loss 40%, 75+ years
Christensen et al, 2001
NAS-NRC Twin Panel
Heritability: 60% (self-reported). HI susceptibility locus on chromosome
3, DFNA18 locus Reed et al, 2000; Garringer et al, 2006
Finnish Twin Study on Aging
Heritability: >60%, measured hearing, 63-76 years, women
Self-reported hearing related to environmental factors
Viljanen et al, 2007
Causes of ARHL
Environmental, acquired
Period Effects
Vocational noise exposure
Ototoxic drugs
Solvents, other chemicals
e.g. carbon monoxide
Traumatic hearing loss
Infections
Middle ear disease
Heavy metals (Hg)
0
20
40
60
80
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Unsc ree ned
Noise scr eened
Highly scr eened
Noise – Unscreened
Men, 75 y (70-80 y)
Compilation of 8 studies
Highly screened for otological
disease and noise (green)
Screened for noise only (blue)
Unscreened studies, noise
exposed populations (red)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
dB
HL
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8
kHz
No Noise v s Occupational Noise
The Göteborg Gerontol. Study
Noise +15y
No Noise
n: 137 NN
n: 100 N+15y
Occupational Noise - No Noise
Men, 70 y
No noise (blue) vs
occupational noise (red)
H70
Interactions between Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
and ARHL
Additive effect
(adopted by ISO 1999)
Less-than-additive effect
Mills et al, 1996; 1998
More-than-additive effect
Miller et al, 1998
Combined effect
Less ARHI in NIHL-frequencies
(4-6 kHz) Increased ARHI in
neighbouring frequencies, - 2 kHz
Gates et al., 2000
0
0,25
0,5
0,75
1
1,25
1,5
1,75
Ann
ual D
eclin
e, d
B/y
LE
0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 8
kHz
Noise and Presbyacusis
Gates e t al., 2000
Noise
No Noise
Animal research indicates a
sensitising effect of noise
Kujawa & Liberman, 2006
Annual decline dB/year
Three longitudinal studies
H70 Noise vs No Noise
Hederstierna, Rosenhall, 2015
BLSA Noise vs No Noise
Pearson et al, 1995
MUSC No Noise
Lee et al, 2005
Causes of ARHL
Environmental, extrinsic
Life style factors
Every day noise exposure
Leisure time noise exposure, e.g.
music, shooting
Smoking
Alcohol (severe abuse)
Diet
Physical fitness
Interfererande sjukdomar
Kognitiva störningar – Demens
Metabolt syndrom – DM2
AD:
3 – 10% - 65 y
25 – 50% >85 y
Hörsel och kognition hos äldre
Presbyacusis – interaktion med kognitiva störningar
Lin et al, 2013; Lin & Albert, 2014
Positiv effekt av hörselrehabilitering vid
presbyacusis och demens
Amieva et al, 2016
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
High Frequency Pure Tone Average, dB HL
Speech in Noise Test
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Age, YearsS
pe
ech
Pe
rcep
tion
, %
Barrenäs, Wikström 2000
Magnusson, 1996
Hörsel och kognition hos äldre
Centrala auditiva störningar
Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)
CAPD har påvisats vid demens och vid impressiv afasi
Gates et al, 1996, 2002, 2008; Idrizbegovic et al, 2011; 2013
Ramsing et al, 1996
Pure tone audiometry
Speech audiometry
PB words in quiet (SPQ)
In noise (SPN) 4 dB S/N
Dichotic digits test (DDT)
Central Auditory Processing (CAP) dysfunction
is highly evident in early AD, and even in MCI
Evaluation of CAP might provide an auditory
diagnostic complement in monitoring the
progression of AD and MCI
Auditory function in early Alzheimer’s disease
and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Idrizbegovic et al, 2011
136 subjects, mean age:
64 years (range 50-78)
1) AD; 2) MCI;
3) SMC