preparing an organisation for electronic clinical information systems: does culture matter? dr...
TRANSCRIPT
Preparing an organisation for Preparing an organisation for electronic clinical information electronic clinical information
systems: Does culture matter?systems: Does culture matter?Dr Joanne Callen
Senior Research FellowHealth Informatics Research and Evaluation Unit
The University of [email protected]
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Overview of presentation
• Organisational culture – what is it?
• Sub-cultures in large organisations
• Is there a relationship between culture and clinical information systems?
• Models to assist with implementing information systems
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Background
• Organisational culture has been identified as a significant factor for successful implementation of clinical information systems
• Gosling et al. Int J Med Inf. 2003; Aarts et al. JAMIA, 2004; Callen et al. Soc Sci & Med 2007
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
What is organisational culture?
• “the basic pattern of shared assumptions, values and beliefs governing the way employees within an organisation think about and act on problems and opportunities”
• McShane & Von Glinow, 2000, p. 498
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Subcultures
• Pronounced in health care organisations
• Based on professional, occupational, gender, functional distinctions
• Can reflect or differentiate organisation-wide culture
• Can draw values from outside (example medical sub-specialties)
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Research study
• Is there a relationship between hospital sub-cultures and attitudes to, and satisfaction with, clinical information systems?
Callen et al. The importance of medical and nursing sub-cultures in the implementation of clinical information systems. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2009 48(2):196-202
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Methods
• Research setting Two clinical units:
Emergency Department and Haematology/
Oncology Ward 400 bed metropolitan
public teaching hospital
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Clinical information context Computerised
physician order entry system used to order and view all laboratory and radiology tests
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Survey design• Two survey instruments
Organisational culture inventory User satisfaction survey
• Population (n=103)
• All doctors (n=42) and nurses (n=61) in two clinical units
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Organisational culture inventory (OCI)
• Constructive culture work cooperatively; high motivation; teamwork
• Passive/defensive cultureplease those in authority; wait for others to act first
• Aggressive/defensive culture oppose new ideas; compete; appear competent and independent
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Culture and cultural styles in OCI
• Constructive culture Achievement style Self-actualising style Humanistic/
encouraging style Affiliative style
• Passive/defensive culture Approval style Conventional style Dependent style Avoidance style
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Culture and cultural styles in OCI
• Aggressive/
defensive culture Power style Competitive style Perfectionistic style Oppositional style
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
User satisfaction survey
• Impact of CPOE on: work practices patient care satisfaction with CPOE attitudes to CPOE
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Results: Population and Respondents
Population – 103Response Rate – 73%
Population – 103Response Rate – 93%
OCIOCI User satisfaction surveyUser satisfaction survey
27%
44%
29%
Doctors
Nurses
Non-respondents
35%
58%
7% Doctors
Nurses
Non-respondents
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Doctors & Nurses Perception of Culture
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Constructive
Passive-defensive
Aggressive-defensive
Doctors
Nurses
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Constructive Culture Styles
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Pe
rce
nti
le s
co
res
Achievem
ent
Self-ac
tuali
sing
Human
istic
Affilia
tive
Doctors
Nurses
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Passive-Defensive Cultural Styles
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Doctors
Nurses
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Aggressive-Defensive Cultural Styles
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Doctors
Nurses
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Attitudes to CPOE systemAttitudes
Doctors n=36
Nurses n=60
Using computerised test management systems:
Agree%
Neutral%
Disagree%
Agree%
Neutral%
Disagree%
p-value
Results in cookbook medicine
28 11 61 25 28 47 0.134
Depersonalises medicine 11 19 69 10 12 78 0.550
Helps in deciding which tests to order
25 19 56 71 19 10 0.000
Improves the practice of medicine
61 31 8 73 17 10 0.281
Results in over ordering of tests
58 14 28 30 38 32 0.010
Alienates doctors from patients
3 8 89 6 29 65 0.254
Makes my work more interesting
33 50 17 63 29 8 0.024
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Discussion
• Cultures are not uniform in large hospitals• Constructive culture of nurses – support CPOE• Aggressive-defensive culture of doctors –
discourage uptake of new innovations• High perfectionist style of doctors –
counterproductive to implementation of new technologies
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Implications of the results
• Examine sub-cultures prior to implementation
• Strategies for moving to a constructive culture can be employed
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Strategies to move to constructive culture
• Individual level Goal setting; job design; motivational
processes
• Unit level Performance appraisal; inclusive meetings
• Organisational level Communication; respect for staff; employee
involvement
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Models to assist with implementing information systems
• Change management models Rogers EM Diffusion of Innovations, 1995
• Ash’s principles Ash et al. Proc AMIA 2003
• Contextual Implementation Model Callen et al. JAMIA 2008
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Contextual Implementation Model• Grounded in data• Core theme of ‘contextual differences’• Diversity at 3 contextual levels
– Organisational level– Clinical or departmental level– Individual level
• Dimensions for consideration within each level (organisational culture, unit leadership, diverse ways of working)
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Contextual Implementation Model
Organisational Context
Clinical Unit Context
Individual Context
Use of clinical
information systems
Government policy
Economy
IT industry Professional groups
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Value of models and theories
• To realise the potential benefits of I&CT to patients, clinicians and government we need to develop and test models of evaluation and implementation
14th October 2009 HIMAA National Conference Perth 2009
Role of the health informatics specialist in implementation
• Health Information Managers function at the core of the change process in healthcare
• Play a major role in implementing, managing, and leading IT adoption to improve health care
• Change theories and implementation models provide a framework for understanding and supporting these large scale IT implementations