preparing abstracts and presenting papers conferences
DESCRIPTION
Session 4B from City University London's Researchers' Development Day, held on Friday 4th May 2012.TRANSCRIPT
PREPARING ABSTRACTS & PRESENTING PAPERS AND POSTERS AT CONFERENCES
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT DAY 4TH MAY 2012
Dr Siân Lindsay, Learning Development Centre
Today’s session
Finding out and choosing your conference
Looking at a conference call How to write and submit a conference
abstract Activity Dealing with feedback on your
submission Preparing, designing and delivering your
presentation Some tips for poster presentations
Are you planning to submit an abstract to a conference...
1 2 3 4 5 6
17% 17% 17%17%17%17%1. Yes, in the next
month2. Yes, in the next
1- 3 months3. Yes, after 3
months time4. Yes eventually
but not just yet5. Really not sure6. Not at all
How can I find out about upcoming conferences?
Advice from your supervisor(s) Advice from your peers and colleagues at City and
elsewhere Conference proceedings that you have come across Some journals have an associated conference Conference calls advertised online, in magazines,
newspapers Mailing lists Societies, Publishers, Funding Councils in your
interested fields (e.g. IEEE, SRHE, Welcome) normally publish a conference calendar which you can view online
You might have attended the conference previously
Choosing your conference
What is the size of the conference?
What sort of audience?
What options for presenting are there?
What facilities are there?
Will you present on your own?
Analysing an example Conference Call
How to submit an abstract
As well as addressing the conference themes, you also need to consider:1. What is the deadline for abstract
submission?2.How do you submit? Usually it is
online submission website, but some conferences ask for emailed submissions. Hardly any require paper submissions nowadays.
3. How much detail do they want? Word count?
4.When will you hear?
What is a conference abstract? Written summary of a paper or poster that
you intend to present But distilling all your research into a few
hundred words is not easy!
“If you want a 10 min summary, I can have it for you a week from today; if you want it to be 30 minutes, I can do it tomorrow; if you want a whole hour, I’m ready now” (Pierson, 2004 p. 1207)
ACTIVITY (10 mins)
Using the pro-forma sheet going around, plan an abstract of your own for a conference you are interested in attending
After the submission comes the feedback... Usually reviewed by 2 reviewers, final
decision by conference committee Were you successful? – great! Start
preparing... If you were rejected:
You should receive reviewers comments to find out why (or you can request these)
Reviewers comments should help you learn from the experience
Comments may be harsh – but don’t be put off – keep trying!
What makes a bad presentation?
What makes a good presentation?
How to make good presentations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC4B
DmDG_N4&feature=channel
1. Where will you be presenting? (check out room) What time?
2. Who is your session chair? (talk to them before, if possible negotiate timings)
3. How long are you to present for? How much time is set aside for your talk and how much for questions?
4. What about AV provision? Presentation on USB stick or email through beforehand (or both) ?
5. Have you rehearsed and timed yourself properly? (timings usually very strict)
Preparation
Tell them what you are going to tell them
Tell them;
Tell them what you’ve told them
Structure
Intro
Conclusion
Main point – summary
Main point – summary
Main point – summary
Opening line…
Structure
…closing line.
Stories, artefacts
Your contact details, socialise and network!
Dealing with
Presentation nerves
Emulate a presenter
you admire
Try and relax, take
deep breaths
Rehearse and keep to time,
practice makes perfect
Have some questions
for the audience
If you make a mistake don’t
dwell on it (no-one will notice)
Have confidence in yourself – you are here for a
reason
An Example of a Bad Slide
Poor choice of font style Font size difficult to read Background too busy Animation quite frustrating and detracts
attention!
Richard Hake’s 1997 study In 1997 Richard Hake published some
results in a paper entitled “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses”
Test results from 6000 Physics students from High School (HS), College and University were sampled
At the start all students had to sit a standard test (called a Force Concept Inventory) – this was a pre-test. They were then tested again after a period of time where some were taught using traditional means of lecturing, others using interactive engagement with techniques such as the Classroom Clickers.
Here you see the normalised results of the pre-test plotted against the gain in knowledge following teaching using traditional or interactive engagement techniques.
Significant higher gains in knowledge are seen with students who are tested having been taught using interactive engagement – and this is across the board
This is perhaps the most convincing research to date that supports the use of ‘teaching by questioning’ because of its large and varied sampling.
Clip-Art overload!
A picture is worth a thousand words…
Great for Visual learners
Approximately 70% of information is retained visually
Choose visual aids carefully – use them to explain or reinforce, not decorate!
Preparing Posters: Do’s and Don’ts
Keep it brief and simple
Retain any white space
Get feedback on design (on-screen and printed)
Use images as much as possible
Assume that people will read your poster – you will have to talk it through
Have blocks of text longer than 10 lines
Use too small a font size
DO DON’T
Designing Conference Posters: http://colinpurrington.com/tips/academic/posterdesign
Taking Questions
• Repeat them back
• Give straight answer, be honest
• Consider collecting questions (ask Chair)
• Get audience to answer
• Follow up after the session
References
Coad, J. and Devitt, P. (2006) The art of writing an abstract for conferences Nurse Education in Practice 6: 112 – 116
Alexandrov, A, V. and Hennerici, M. G. (2007) Writing Good Practices Cerebrovascular Diseases 23: 256 – 259