©prentice hall 2006 chapter four supportive leadership behavior 4-1
TRANSCRIPT
©Prentice Hall 2006
CHAPTER FOUR
SUPPORTIVELEADERSHIPBEHAVIOR
4-1
©Prentice Hall 2006
Learning Objectives
Describe supportive leadership as an effective leadership behavior.
Explain why supportive leadership is important for individual followers and groups.
Describe some of the skills, traits, and sources of power a leader needs to develop to be an effective supportive leader.
Discuss some of the skills needed for effective listening, which is part of supportive leadership.
Describe several impacts leader supportiveness has on follower psychological reactions and behaviors.
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
4-2
©Prentice Hall 2006
Learning Objectives (cont.)
Identify organizational situations where supportive leadership is especially effective.
Identify situations where supportive leadership is probably not effective.
Discuss how leaders can modify situations to increase the effectiveness of their supportive behaviors.
Understand how leaders can modify followers’ tasks to substitute for some supportiveness and still maintain positive follower attitudes and performance.
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
4-3
©Prentice Hall 2006
Supportive Leadership
Showing concern for the status, well-being and needs of followers; demonstrating a kind, considerate and understanding attitude regarding followers’ problems; and fostering followers’ professional development.
4-4
©Prentice Hall 2006
Types of Supportive Leadership Behaviors
SUPPORTIVELEADERSHIPBEHAVIORS
Being friendly,informative, and
encouraging
Being friendly,informative, and
encouraging
Being considerateand
understanding
Being considerateand
understanding
Being sympatheticto others’problems
Being sympatheticto others’problems
Helping followersdevelop abilities
and careers
Helping followersdevelop abilities
and careers
Showing trust and
respect
Showing trust and
respect
Showingconcern for
follower needs
Showingconcern for
follower needs
4-5
©Prentice Hall 2006
Examples of Supportive Leadership
A military officer showed ongoing concern and respect for subordinate differences in cultural or racial values, life styles, and mores.
A supervisor was alert to personal problems of subordinates and, once aware of the problems, made a concerted effort to help the subordinate solve them.
A leader made a conscious effort to encourage and provide “air time” for everyone during staff meetings and to distribute privileges or choice task assignments equitably.
4-6
©Prentice Hall 2006
Supportive & Nonsupportive Communication
• Problem-oriented
• Descriptive
• Words & actions consistent
• Encouraging
• Specific
• Interactive (listening)
• Person-oriented (naming)
• Evaluative
• Incongruent words and actions
• Puts people down
• General–Vague
• One-way (telling)
Supportive Nonsupportive
4-7
©Prentice Hall 2006
Skills, Traits and Sources of Power for Effective Supportive Leadership
SUPPORTIVELEADERSHIPBEHAVIORS
RewardPower
RewardPower
InterpersonalSkills
InterpersonalSkills
Referent Power
Referent Power
CommunicationSkills
CommunicationSkills
ExpertPower
ExpertPower
Technical &ProfessionalCompetence
Technical &ProfessionalCompetence
4-8
©Prentice Hall 2006
Facilitating and Limiting Conditions for Supportive Leadership
Organization and follower characteristics Style preferences of the leader's
superior The organizational mission or culture Followers preferences for supportive
leader behavior Cultural preferences for supportive
leader behavior
4-9
©Prentice Hall 2006
Supportiveness and Followers’ Behavior
One approach advocates that a leader should use interpersonal support as a reward. This approach is closely aligned with behavioral
psychology and is based on the operant conditioning model of learning associated with B. F. Skinner. The rationale is that the leader should show most concern and provide greatest encouragement for the best performers.
One important issue for leaders is whether they should provide more interpersonal support to some subordinates than others. To be effective, a leader needs to adapt to different subordinates.
4-10
©Prentice Hall 2006
Supportiveness and Followers’ Behavior (cont.)
Tommy LaSorda, past manager of the Los Angles Dodgers, represents the approach which says that leaders should provide supportiveness as needed by individual followers rather than as a reward for high performance.
His supportiveness can be a “facilitating condition” stimulating improved follower performance.
Using supportiveness as positive reinforcement does not address the needs of followers whose performance is less than desired. These employees may need a concerned and encouraging leader to provide them with the confidence necessary to improve their performance.
4-11
©Prentice Hall 2006
Situational Factors that Enhance Supportive Leadership
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT ENHANCE THEEFFECTIVENESS OF SUPPORTIVENESS
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT ENHANCE THEEFFECTIVENESS OF SUPPORTIVENESS
FOLLOWERCHARACTERISTICS
FOLLOWERCHARACTERISTICS
TASKCHARACTERISTICS
TASKCHARACTERISTICS
• low self-confidence• low self-esteem• insecurity• expectation that leader will be supportive• high growth needs
• low self-confidence• low self-esteem• insecurity• expectation that leader will be supportive• high growth needs
• dissatisfying• stressful• highly structured• requires creativity• requires learning
• dissatisfying• stressful• highly structured• requires creativity• requires learning
ORGANIZATIONAL & GROUPCHARACTERISTICS
ORGANIZATIONAL & GROUPCHARACTERISTICS
• external conflict• newly formed group• cohesive group with shared beliefs in leader• formal plans, goals & procedures• mission emphasizing human services• authoritarian superior
• external conflict• newly formed group• cohesive group with shared beliefs in leader• formal plans, goals & procedures• mission emphasizing human services• authoritarian superior
4-12
©Prentice Hall 2006
Situational Factors that Neutralize Supportive Leadership
SITUATIONALFACTORS THAT
NEUTRALIZE THEEFFECTIVENESS OFSUPPORTIVENESS
SITUATIONALFACTORS THAT
NEUTRALIZE THEEFFECTIVENESS OFSUPPORTIVENESS
Large Sizeof Group
Large Sizeof Group
High LevelJob
High LevelJob
DogmaticFollowers
DogmaticFollowers
Broad TaskScope
Broad TaskScope
4-13
©Prentice Hall 2006
Situational Factors That Substitute for Supportive Leadership
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT SUBSTITUTE FOR
SUPPORTIVENESS
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT SUBSTITUTE FOR
SUPPORTIVENESS
FEEDBACK DIRECTLY
FROM TASK•Rapid
•Specific•Accurate
FEEDBACK DIRECTLY
FROM TASK•Rapid
•Specific•Accurate
HIGH DEGREE OF IMPORTANCE PLACED ON ORGANIZATIONAL
REWARDS•Pay raises
• Promotions
HIGH DEGREE OF IMPORTANCE PLACED ON ORGANIZATIONAL
REWARDS•Pay raises
• Promotions
INTRINSICALLYSATISYING TASK
•Interesting• Gratifying
• Meaningful
INTRINSICALLYSATISYING TASK
•Interesting• Gratifying
• Meaningful
4-14
©Prentice Hall 2006
Process Model of the Supportive Leadership Process
LEADER SUPPORTIVENESS• Concerned, trusting, & respectful of followers• Considerate, understanding attitude• Friendly, encouraging, & communicative• Fostering follower development
FOLLOWER/GROUPPSYCHOLOGICAL REACTIONS• Satisfaction of esteem & acceptance
needs • Satisfaction with work & supervisor• Overall job satisfaction• Organizational commitment• Less stress & burnout• Group harmony & cohesion
FOLLOWER BEHAVIORSAND OUTCOMES• Lower turnover, tardiness, absenteeism,
& grievance rates• Increased individual & group
performance
4-15
SITUATIONAL FACTORS INCREASING LEADEREFFECTIVENESS Enhancers• Dissatisfying or stressful job• Low follower self-
confidence, insecurity, or self esteem
• Follower expectations or high growth needs
• Structured work task• Complex creative task• External group conflict• New or cohesive group• Organization formalization• Organization mission• Authoritarian supervisor
Substitutes• Importance placed on
organizational rewards• Intrinsically satisfying tasks• Task feedback
SITUATIONAL FACTORS DECREASING LEADER EFFECTIVENESS
Neutralizers • Dogmatic followers• Large size of group
©Prentice Hall 2006
Applying the Model of Supportive Leadership
1. Are followers faced with high amounts of job stress, danger, or insecurity?
2. Do followers’ lack self-confidence or have low self-esteem?
3. Is followers’ group experiencing much external conflict, excessive rules and regulations, or highly authoritarian upper-level management?
4. Does followers’ group have a human service function?
If “yes” to one or more of these questions, then leaders’ supportive behaviors will probably be effective.
1. DIAGNOSING THE SITUATION
Leaders also act to:
•Alleviate stressors, insecurities, and conflicts facing followers
•Modify followers’ situations to increase intrinsic satisfaction and task feedback
•Manipulate the reward system to improve follower attitudes and performance
3. MODIFYING FOLLOWERS AND/OR SITUATIONS
Leader demonstrates supportive behaviors with followers by:
• Showing concern
• Being sympathetic, considerate, and understanding
• Being friendly and informative
• Encouraging two-way communication
• Showing trust and respect
• Providing for career development
2. PROVIDING SUPPORTIVE LEADERSHIP
4-16