pre-defense communication check

20
Project A.3 (ongoing ) Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation RB 2 C Project 2008-2009 RB 2 C supplement

Upload: francisco

Post on 11-May-2015

212 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Pre-defense communication check

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pre-defense communication check

Project A.3 (ongoing)

Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

RB2C Project 2008-2009

RB2C supplement

Page 2: Pre-defense communication check

Background

2 / 70

Need of available and affordable constituents (matrix and fibers)

Need to provide alternative environmentally-benign structural systems for strengthening, consisting of natural and synthetic materials (NSF SMM program)

Relevance of minimizing release of toxic fumes under fire

Relevance of devising reversible systems: applications on historic buildings

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

Page 3: Pre-defense communication check

SustainabilitySustainability

3 / 70

High and Low Fiber sheet Density: wettability

Literature has shown this architecture type to be a viable option

Two part acrylic-modified Portland cement based matrix

Hydraulic cement-based matrix, high water retention, extreme fine aggregate, paste rich

Experimental program: overview

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

Page 4: Pre-defense communication check

Pure axial tensile tests of composite laminates for the characterization of the FRC composite are under way.

4 / 70

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

Matrix Fiber PliesNumber of Specimens

Hydraulic Glass 1 3 Hydraulic Basalt 1 3 Acrylic Glass 1 3 Acrylic Basalt 1 3 Hydraulic Glass 2 3 Hydraulic Basalt 2 3 Acrylic Glass 2 3 Acrylic Basalt 2 3 Hydraulic Glass 4 3 Hydraulic Basalt 4 3 Acrylic Glass 4 3 Acrylic Basalt 4 3

Experimental program

Page 5: Pre-defense communication check

Environmental impact analysis

5 / 70

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

Environmental impact analysis of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Cementitious-Matrix composite as green building construction rehabilitation system:

High degree of chemical and mechanical compatibility Recyclable composite Non-flammable matrix and high thermal stability Non toxic, water based product Natural based components: fibers and matrix Ease of handling and safety

VOC emissions via small environmental test

chamber (ASTM D5116)

Estimate of carbon footprint and Life Cycle Assessment

(ASTM E 1991)

Page 6: Pre-defense communication check

BFRC Results: Environmental impact analysis

6 / 70

Green building construction rehabilitation system:BFRC emits 130% less ppm of VOCs, than its counter part GFRP

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

0 50 100 150 200

Conce

ntr

atio

n (ppm

)

Time (min)

BFRC

GFRP

Page 7: Pre-defense communication check

7 / 70

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

BFRC uses 87% less energy in MJ/kg to be produced and applied than GFRP.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

BFRC

GFRP fibers

fibers

primer matrix

matrix

BFRC Results: Environmental impact analysis

Amount of energy required to manufacture, apply and dispose the composite strengthening system in terms of Mega joules per kilogram (MJ/kg):

Page 8: Pre-defense communication check

8 / 70

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

BFRC releases 77% less carbon in kgCO2/kg than the traditionally used GFRP.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

BFRC

GFRP fibers

fibers

primer matrix

matrix

BFRC Results: Environmental impact analysis

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): ASTM E 1991Determine which strengthening system, per unit kilogram, had the least effect on human health and the environment, as per the carbon released (kgCO2/kg):.

Page 9: Pre-defense communication check

9 / 70

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

BFRC Results: Environmental impact analysis

BFRC can be implemented as a sustainable strengthening composite system, developing the implementation of green building construction

rehabilitation systems.

Provides added fire protection, without added cost of material systems.

Reduces hazard to workers during application due to low emittance of Volatile Organic Compounds.

Less embodied energy, lower system costs: during application and disposal (no primer needed).

Implements readily available natural materials. Reversibility is achieved making it possible to

inspect/replace structures. Recyclable materials, easy of waste material.

Page 10: Pre-defense communication check

10 / 70

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

(Open parenthesis:Industry relevance to LEED

LEED: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Buildings, a Green Building Rating System.

MATERIALS & RESOURCES:MATERIALS & RESOURCES:Credit 3.1 & 3.2: Credit 3.1 & 3.2: Optimize use of IAQ compliant productsOptimize use of IAQ compliant productsMATERIALS & RESOURCES:MATERIALS & RESOURCES:Credit 3.1 & 3.2: Credit 3.1 & 3.2: Optimize use of IAQ compliant productsOptimize use of IAQ compliant products

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:Prerequisite 4: Prerequisite 4: Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) RemovalPolychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) RemovalCredit 3: Credit 3: Construction IAQ Management planConstruction IAQ Management plan

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:Prerequisite 4: Prerequisite 4: Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) RemovalPolychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) RemovalCredit 3: Credit 3: Construction IAQ Management planConstruction IAQ Management plan

INNOVATION IN UPGRADES:INNOVATION IN UPGRADES:Credits 1 – 4: Credits 1 – 4: Innovation in upgrade, operations and Innovation in upgrade, operations and MaintenanceMaintenance

INNOVATION IN UPGRADES:INNOVATION IN UPGRADES:Credits 1 – 4: Credits 1 – 4: Innovation in upgrade, operations and Innovation in upgrade, operations and MaintenanceMaintenance

Total: 1 prerequisite + 7 credits …close parenthesis)

Page 11: Pre-defense communication check

Fabio Matta, PhDResearch Assistant ProfessorCivil, Arch. & Environ. Engr.

[email protected]

Antonio Nanni, PhD, PEProfessor and Chair

Civil, Arch. & Environ. [email protected]

Francisco J. De Caso y BasaloGraduate Research Assistant

Civil, Architectural & Environmental [email protected]

ChK Group, Inc.

Coforce

Contacts

Project B.3 | Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix composites for infrastructure rehabilitation

NSF I/UCRC RB2C Fall 2008 Plenary Meeting | St. Louis, MO | November 2, 2008

Jaqueline James, PhD, PEAssistant Professor

Civil, Arch. & Environ. [email protected]

Page 12: Pre-defense communication check

Project X.X (new)

ICE methodology: Investigation of Circumferential-strain Experiment methodology

RB2C Project 2008-2009

RB2C supplement

Page 13: Pre-defense communication check

Introduction: ICE Methodology

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

Use of ice expansion, to apply an internal hydrostatic pressure to cylindrical based samples for the characterization of these materials.

Current tensile characterization values of circumferential composite jackets, do not correspond to experimental results in the hoop direction.

Direct tensile tests provide an upper bound value. This experimental methodology aims at determining a lower bound (ie

safer) approach to the characterization of materials applied cylindrically.

13 / 70

fl

FRP jacket

ffe

Concrete column

fl

fl

P

VS

Page 14: Pre-defense communication check

Background: Use of ice expansion as load

14 / 70

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

Ice, complex material: at least 12 different forms of ice. Varies stage of matter with temperature and pressure.  Expands by approximately 9% due to its “open”

crystalline structure. The ice structure is completely hydrogen bonded. 29,000 psi (200MPa) maximum potential exertion

pressure of normal ice (Ih).

Ordinary ice: Ice 1

hexagonal

Page 15: Pre-defense communication check

Experimental Method: Use of ice expansion as load

15 / 70

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

Homogenous formation of ice crystals =

Hydrostatic pressure

A. Mixing water with a colloid: chemical mixture where one substance is dispersed evenly throughout another (such as milk):

100 % milk100 % water

B. Appling a constant vibration to the specimen while freezing, reduces the tendency of isolated crystal growth.

Page 16: Pre-defense communication check

- 15ºC- 15ºC 5ºF5ºF

16 / 70

Experimental Setup

Objective: to develop a simple, practical, repetitive and cost effective test method to determine true hoop strain.

Data validation: testing direct tensile samples at same environmental conditions.

Bolts

Constraining-end platesBarsThermocoupleSample (metal can)Strain GaugesWater-IceGroove with O-Ring

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

Diameter, D Thickness, tBond

 

Length

(in) (mm) (in) (mm) (in/mm)

2.5 63.5 0.0075 0.1905 Y Constant2.5 63.5 0.0075 0.1905 N Constant2.5 63.5 0.015 0.381 Y Constant2.5 63.5 0.015 0.381 N Constant4 101.6 0.0075 0.1905 Y Constant4 101.6 0.0075 0.1905 N Constant4 101.6 0.015 0.381 Y Constant4 101.6 0.015 0.381 N Constant

Page 17: Pre-defense communication check

Experimental Method: Feasibility of ice expansion as load

17 / 70

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

Strain distribution: As expected maximum strain was experienced at the centre, and symmetric strain at opposite ends.

Peak strain of 7500 εμ (0.75%)

L

L/2L/4

L/4

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Time (Hrs)

Str

ain

(εμ)

Page 18: Pre-defense communication check

Experimental Method: Feasibility of ice expansion as load

18 / 70

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

Deformation: By making an initial assumption where the can deflects as a fixed end beam, its deformation is similar.

Page 19: Pre-defense communication check

Results of Feasibility of ice expansion as load

19 / 70

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology

The ICE methodology successfully applied internal pressure to cylindrical samples. Dislocation planes of yielded steel can are clearly visible

Data validation is the next step to correlate peak strains.

Page 20: Pre-defense communication check

Fabio Matta, PhDResearch Assistant ProfessorCivil, Arch. & Environ. Engr.

[email protected]

Antonio Nanni, PhD, PEProfessor and Chair

Civil, Arch. & Environ. [email protected]

Francisco J. De Caso y BasaloGraduate Research Assistant

Civil, Architectural & Environmental [email protected]

ChK Group, Inc.

Coforce

Contacts

NSF I/UCRC RB2C Spring 2009 Plenary Meeting | ???????? | June, 2009

Project X.X | “ICE” Methodology – Investigation of Circumferential Strain experiment Methodology