ppt

23
Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Vasken Dilsizian, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Radiology Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography University of Maryland School of Medicine

Upload: networkingcentral

Post on 15-Jan-2015

514 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ppt

Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac ImagingVasken Dilsizian, M.D.Professor of Medicine and RadiologyDirector of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and Cardiac Positron Emission TomographyUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine

Page 2: ppt

Radiopharmaceuticals Used in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Procedures

• Myocardial perfusionSPECT PET Thallium-201 Rubidium-82Tc-99m Sestamibi N-13 ammoniaTc-99m Tetrofosmin

• Cardiac function- Tc-99m Pertechnetate

• Myocardial metabolism- F-18 Deoxyglucose

Page 3: ppt

Clinical Application of Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Procedures in the Pediatric

Population

• Congenital Heart Disease • Diagnosis of Coronary Circulation Anomalies• Kawasaki Disease• Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy• Monitoring Chemotherapy

Page 4: ppt
Page 5: ppt

(Components of the Cardiac Sarcomere)

Page 6: ppt
Page 7: ppt
Page 8: ppt
Page 9: ppt
Page 10: ppt
Page 11: ppt
Page 12: ppt

Administration of Radiopharmaceuticals in the Pediatric Population

It is common for the radiopharmaceutical doses to be based on:• Body Weight• Body Surface AreaAnother approach is to administer “Relative Dose” based on radiation exposure. That is, mCi administered to a child that gives the same absorbed radiation as 1 mCi administered to an adult

Reynolds JC, Proceedings of Workshop for Treatment of Thyroid Cancer in Childhood, NIH 1992

Page 13: ppt

Goals of Nuclear Imaging in the Pediatric Population

• Inject the lowest dose possible without sacrificing “Image Quality” or “Diagnostic Accuracy”

• Risk vs Benefits: Risk of radiation exposure vs benefits of understanding the underlying disease process (inherent in all medical decisions)

Page 14: ppt

Radiation Exposure With Studies Involving Radiopharmaceuticals

• Radiopharmaceuticals produce nonhomogeneous exposure to the whole body. That is, exposure dose varies for each organ depending on the biokinetics of the radiopharmaceutical.

Page 15: ppt

Various Concepts Used to Evaluate the Total Risk of a Procedure

• Total-body or Whole-body dose: The total energy deposited in the body divided by the mass of the body. This approach assumes a uniform whole-body exposure to radiation.

• Effective dose (E) or Effective dose equivalent (HE): Involves multiplying individual organ doses by risk weighing factors and summing the individual contributions into a single dose.

Page 16: ppt

Tissue Weighing factor (wT)

• The values of wT take into account the numbers of 1) fatal cancers and 2) risk of hereditary disease above normal incidence per unit of ionizing radiation for each organ system for which such effects are known to occur.

Page 17: ppt

CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE

The effective dose is the sum of the weighted equivalent doses in all the tissues and organs of the body. It is given by the expression:

  E = T (wT x HT)

where:E = the effective whole body dose

 wT = the tissue weighting factor for tissue T

 HT = the equivalent dose in tissue or organ T; absorbed dose averaged

over a tissue or organ and weighted for the radiation quality. The radiation quality factor for clinical radiation (photons, x-rays) is 1;

thus, the equivalent dose is equal to the absorbed organ dose.

NIH RSC Report: Improving Informed Consent for Research Radiation Studies, 10/17/2001

Page 18: ppt

Tissue Weighting Factors, wT (ICRP 73, 1996)1

  Remainder of tissues or organs = 0.05

1 The values have been developed from a reference population of equal numbers of both sexes and a wide range of ages. In the definition of effective

dose, they apply to workers, to the whole population, and to either sex.

Gonads 0.20

Bone Marrow 0.12

Colon 0.12

Lung 0.12

Stomach 0.12

Bladder 0.05

Breast 0.05

Liver 0.05

Esophagus 0.05

Thyroid 0.05

Skin 0.01

Bone Surface 0.01

wT wTOrgan Organ

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), publication 73, 1996 NIH RSC Report: Improving Informed Consent for Research Radiation Studies, 10/17/2001

Page 19: ppt

Calculation of Effective Dose for 10mCi of FDG in an Adult Subject

Breasts 0.340 0.050 0.017

Esophagus 0.440 0.050 0.022

Stomach 0.470 0.120 0.056

Colon 0.482 0.120 0.058

Heart 2.200 0.025 0.055

Liver 0.580 0.050 0.029

Lungs 0.640 0.120 0.077

Organ Dose (rem) WTEffective Dose

Effective DoseNIH RSC Report: Improving Informed Consent for Research Radiation Studies, 10/17/2001Dosimetry Source: Coronado, L. (F-18)FDG Internal Rad Dosim for Research Protocols, NIH, 10/30/91

Ovaries 0.530 0.200 0.106

R. Marrow 0.470 0.120 0.056

Bone 0.410 0.010 0.004

Skin 0.300 0.010 0.003

Thyroid 0.390 0.050 0.020

Bladder 3.200 0.050 0.160

Remainder 0.689 0.025 0.017

Effective Dose

WTDose (rem)Organ

1.000 0.680

Page 20: ppt

Radiation Risk Estimation

The additional fatal cancer risk for a subject group, participating in a clinical or research radiation study, can be estimated by the following expression: (Total effective dose for the study, in rem)

X (fatal cancer risk per rem for age group)  

NIH RSC Report: Improving Informed Consent for Research Radiation Studies, 10/17/2001

Page 21: ppt

Nominal Probability Coefficients for Stochastic Effects

Detriment x 10 –4 per rem

 

Exposed Population

Fatal Cancer

Non-fatal Cancer

SevereHereditary Effects

Total

Children (0-19) 8.0 1.6 1.6 11.20

Adult workers (20-60)

4.0 0.8 0.8 5.60

Geriatric (over 50)

1.0 0.2 0.65 1.46

Whole Population (0-90)

5.0 1.0 1.3 7.30

 

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), publication 60 (p.22)

For children, the risks are 2-3 times greater than for adults, while for individuals over 50 years of age, the risks are 1/5th to 1/10th of that of younger cohorts.

Page 22: ppt

Radiation Risk Estimation

  (Total effective dose for the study, in rem) X (fatal cancer risk per rem for age group)

 As illustrated in the previous effective dose calculation (FDG scan of 10 mCi), the additional estimated increase in fatal cancer risk for the adult subject is as follows: 

(0.680 rem) (4.0 x 10 -4 per rem) = 0.00027 = 0.027 %  Note that the natural incidence of fatal cancer is 25%. Therefore, the theoretical total risk of fatal cancer for the group of adult subjects participating in this example study is predicted as 25.027 %, or, rounded to 25.03%. It is important to remember that effective dose is a theoretical quantity; no organ or system, including the total body, actually receives the calculated dose.

NIH RSC Report: Improving Informed Consent for Research Radiation Studies, 10/17/2001

Page 23: ppt

Radiation Dose Guideline Established for “Research” Subjects at the NIH

Previous Guideline: Organ dose of 3 rem - quarterly Organ dose of 5 rem - annual

Current Guideline: Total effective dose of 5 rem – annual

Guideline Value for Pediatric Subjects (<18 yrs) 1/10th the adult value, or 0.5 rem per year

NIH RSC Report: Improving Informed Consent for Research Radiation Studies, 10/17/2001