pp500: public administration and management unit 4 professor jamie scripps [email protected]

32
PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps [email protected] u

Upload: michael-davidson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

PP500: Public Administration and Management

Unit 4

Professor Jamie Scripps

[email protected]

Page 2: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Housekeeping

Grading scheduleFeedbackQuestions?

Page 3: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Unit 4 – Begin Group Project

Resource Allocation

This assignment will help you understand the hard decisions public administrators make when allocating financial resources.

Each year government agencies submit budget proposals to the federal government hoping to receive the amount requested. In most cases, the agency is required to fulfill its obligations with fewer resources than requested.

 

Page 4: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Unit 4 – Begin Group Project

For this project you will work with a small group to plan the annual expenditures for a federal agency.

 You can “meet” with your group in the Group Project wiki space. The wiki is simply a space for you to collaborate with the other members of your group.

Click on the “Project Details” button in Unit 4 for more information about the Group Project.

Page 5: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Unit 4 – Written Assignment

For this project, you will create a PowerPoint presentation in which you research three government organizations.

One must be a federal agency and one must be a state or local agency.

The third organization can be federal, state, or local, based on your own interests.

Page 6: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Unit 4 – Written Assignment

Click on “Assignment Details” in Unit 4 for more information…

Page 7: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Questions?

Page 8: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Reading Assignment

Chapters 7 and 9

Page 9: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

History of Public Personnel

The image of a “bloated” national bureaucracy may not completely accurate.

Since 1951, civilian employment in the national government remained relatively stable prior to the Bush administration build-up beginning in 2002, whereas state and local government employment increased dramatically.

Page 10: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

State and Local Personnel

Total state and local employment, both full-and part- time, has nearly quadrupled, increasing from fewer than 4 million in 1951 to over 16 million in 2006. The figure for full-time equivalent ( FTE) employees was 16.14 million in March 2006 (see Table 7– 1).

Page 11: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

State and Local Personnel

Nearly 80% of all state and local employees work as teachers, nurses, firefighters, police officers, or other public safety or correctional officers.

Page 12: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Public Realities

It has been suggested that it is increasingly state and local governments, along with private contractors, that actually translate national government directives into public realities.

Page 13: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Discussion Question

Most federal agencies have reduced the size of their workforces. Simultaneously, smaller staffs have to deal with increasing workloads, often using outdated technology. Should federal agency budgets be increased to compensate for this trend? What alternatives exist? Are these alternatives desirable? Why or why not?

Page 14: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

President Clinton

The Clinton administration (1993– 2001) reduced civilian federal government employment by eliminating several layers of supervisory positions in nearly all federal executive departments.

Page 15: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

President Bush

Under President Bush, growth in total federal employment increased by 7.4% between 2002 and 2006, but most of that was limited to homeland security, national defense, and federal criminal justice, with other functional areas absorbing deep cuts.

Page 16: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

President Obama?

What has been the trend under the Obama Administration?

Which factors have contributed to this trend?

Page 17: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Evolution of Public Personnel Administration

The evolution of public personnel administration, from 1789 to the present, did not occur in a social or political vacuum.

Rather, development of the personnel function and of specific practices was related to other changes in public administration and society.

Page 18: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by “gentlemen” reflected the powerful influence of the American quasi- aristocracy on all of politics.

Page 19: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by the “common man” resulted from a movement toward a more egalitarian political system.

Page 20: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by the “good” focused on elimination of corruption in hiring practices and equality of access to competitive entrance examinations.

Page 21: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by the “efficient” was characterized by maintenance of the merit system and of political neutrality and by the pursuit of management efficiency.

Page 22: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by “administrators” saw the development of an activist political role for public administrators.

Page 23: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by “professionals” was a period of greater concern for recruiting, testing generalized skills of job applicants, and meeting the challenges of, as well as the opportunities for, increased professionalism in the public service.

Page 24: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

7 Stages of Evolution

Government by “citizens, experts, and results” is driven by changes in technology, such as e- government facilitated by the Internet, and calls for increased accountability, performance, and minority participation.

The advent of electronic government has brought about nearly “real-time responses,” and access to information on the Internet has brought about a more informed and participatory citizenry.

Page 25: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Discussion Question

Which mode of public administration is preferable? Gentlemen? Common man? Good? Efficient? Administrators? Professionals? Citizens, experts, and results?

Page 26: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Historical Development of Public-Employee Organizations 

Since the late 1950s, collective bargaining procedures— modeled largely after those in the private sector— have replaced traditional management- oriented, and management-controlled, personnel practices in many jurisdictions and at all levels of government.

Page 27: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Collective Bargaining

formalized process of negotiation between management and labor; involves specified steps, in a specified sequence, aimed at reaching an agreement (usually stipulated in contractual form) on terms and conditions of employment, covering an agreed- on period of time; a cycle that is repeated upon expiration of each labor– management con-tract or other agreement.

Page 28: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Who’s the boss?

If nothing else, the taxpayer still has to foot the bill (however indirectly) for costs incurred in reaching agreements.

It is no longer the case that formal bargaining and other forms of decision making in this area can take place without some accounting being made to the ultimate board of directors, that is, the people.

Page 29: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Discussion Question

What are the apparent impacts and implications of public- sector collective bargaining? What areas of the subject, if any, merit further study?

Page 30: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Administrative Process

Formal Arrangements of Personnel Systems

Formal Tasks of Personnel AdministrationPosition ClassificationRecruitment, examination, and selection.

Page 31: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Summary

Public personnel administration has evolved from a fairly routine function of government to a very controversial one. Personnel practices have varied, reflecting at different times the values of strong executive leadership and political representativeness on the one hand and politically neutral competence on the other.

Page 32: PP500: Public Administration and Management Unit 4 Professor Jamie Scripps jscripps@kaplan.edu

Questions?