potentiometric and thermodynamic studies of binary and...
TRANSCRIPT
Potentiometric and Thermodynamic Studies of Binaryand Ternary Transition Metal(II) Complexesof Imidazole-4-acetic Acid and Some Bio-relevantLigands
M. Aljahdali • Ahmed A. El-Sherif • Mohamed M. Shoukry •
Seham E. Mohamed
Received: 30 August 2012 / Accepted: 17 October 2012 / Published online: 28 May 2013� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Abstract Proton–ligand association constants of imidazole-4-acetic acid (IMA) were
determined potentiometrically in aqueous solution at different temperatures in the range
15–35 �C. The stepwise stability constants of IMA with some selected bivalent transition
metal ions were also determined in 0.1 mol�dm-3 NaNO3. The stability of the complexes
follows the trend Cu2? [ Ni2? [ Co2? [ Mn2?, which is in agreement with the Irving–
Williams order of the metal ions. The thermodynamic parameters for Cu(II)–IMA complex
formation were derived and discussed. The ternary complexes Cu(IMA)L (IMA = imid-
azole-4-acetic acid, HL = amino acid, amides or DNA constituents) have been investi-
gated. Ternary complexes of amino acids or amides are formed by a simultaneous
mechanism. Amino acids form the complex Cu(IMA)L, whereas amides form two complex
species Cu(IMA)L and Cu(IMA)(LH-1). The DNA constituents form both 1:1 and 1:2
complexes. The stabilities of ternary complexes are quantitatively compared with their
corresponding binary complexes. The concentration distribution of the complexes in
solution was evaluated as a function of pH.
Keywords Imidazole-4-acetic acid (IMA) � Amino acids � Amides � DNA constituents �Potentiometry � Thermodynamics
M. AljahdaliDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
A. A. El-Sherif (&) � M. M. Shoukry � S. E. MohamedDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypte-mail: [email protected]
A. A. El-SherifDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Science, Northern Borders University, Rafha,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
M. M. ShoukryDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Islamic University, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
123
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050DOI 10.1007/s10953-013-0015-9
AbbreviationsIMA Imidazole-4-acetic acid hydrochloride
GLuA Glutamine
Ino Inosine
Gly Glycine
Pyr Pyrocatecholate
1 Introduction
Binary and ternary chelations occur commonly in biological fluids, as millions of potential
ligands like amino acids, peptides or their derivatives or analogues, and heterocyclic
N-bases are likely to compete for biologically important transition metal ions such as
Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) found in vivo. These chelations, especially complexes that contain
the imidazole ring, have received much attention owing to the fact that the imidazole ring
serves as a metal binding site in a variety of biologically important molecules including
non-heme systems and several metalloproteins (one or more imidazole units are bound to
metal ions in almost all copper- and zinc metalloproteins or, e.g., in nickel-containing
urease) and thus has profound effects on their biological actions [1, 2].
It is well known that a number of imidazole derivatives have biological activity, e.g.
presenting pharmaceutical, biocidal or fungicidal properties [3]. The biological importance
of the imidazole moiety is connected with the co-ordination abilities of this system. The
metal complexes with several imidazole-containing ligands have also been widely studied
as structural model compounds of metal active sites [4]. Some of these ligands have been
found in living organisms as in the case of imidazole-4-acetic (IMA), which is a metabolite
of histamine [5] and histidine [6]. Low levels of IMA has also been found in human
cerebro-spinal fluid [7]. From the bioinorganic point of view, IMA may also interact with
several metal ions present in living cells.
Ternary complexes formed between metal ions and two different types of bioligands,
namely heteroaromatic nitrogen bases and amino acids (or peptides), may be considered as
models for substrate–metal ion–enzyme interactions and other metal ion mediated bio-
chemical interactions [8]. Among these compounds, copper(II) complexes of heterocyclic
amines are of great interest since they exhibit numerous biological activities such as
antitumor [9], anti-candida [10], antimycobacterial [11], and antimicrobial [12] activity,
etc. In a number of biochemical processes, Cu(II) is involved in mixed-ligand complex
formation and ligand catalyzed complex formation reactions [13]. Kinetic analysis showed
that the ternary complexes involving amino acids play an important role in the exchange
and transfer of copper(II) between amino acid and albumin [14].
In view of this it seems to be of considerable interest to conduct investigations covering
binary and ternary complexes of copper(II) involving the IMA ligand and amino acids,
amides or DNA units. IMA contains basic nitrogen (imidazole) and possesses p-accepting
properties, which are expected to display a stability-enhancement due to the hydrophobic
interaction with the substituted group of the amino acids or involved in aromatic ring p–pstacking effects with purine and pyrimidine bases. In this respect, it is very interesting to
refer to the work of Farrell et al. [15] who discovered a remarkable increase in the
cytotoxicity of trans-[Pt(py)2Cl2] complexes as compared to the inactive trans-
[Pt(NH3)2Cl2], formed by introducing aromatic nitrogen ligands. In continuation of the
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1029
123
published work in the field of amino acids [16–18], amides [19–21] and DNA units [22–
24], we report in this paper a quantitative study of the formation equilibria of binary and
ternary complexes of copper(II) with IMA and some bio-active ligands.
2 Experimental
2.1 Materials and Reagents
Imidazole-4-acetic acid hydrochloride (IMA) was obtained from the Aldrich Chemical
Company. The amino acids: glycine, alanine, valine, proline, isoleucine, b-phenylalanine,
threonine, lysine, methionine, aspartic acid, histamine, and histidine, together with
methylamine hydrochloride and imidazole, were provided by the Sigma Chemical Com-
pany. The amides used were glycinamide, glycyl–glycine and glutamine, also provided by
Sigma Chemical Company. The DNA constituents as uracil, uridine, thymine, thymidine,
and inosine were supplied by BDH-Biochemicals Ltd. Cu(NO3)2 was provided by BDH.
The copper content of solutions was determined by complexometric EDTA titrations [25].
Carbonate-free NaOH (titrant) was prepared and standardized against potassium hydrogen
phthalate solution. All materials and reagents were used as provided by the chemical
companies without further purification. The purity of these reagents ranged from 98 to
99 %. All solutions were prepared in deionized H2O.
2.2 Instruments
Potentiometric measurements were made using a Metrohm 686 titroprocessor equipped
with a 665 Dosimat (Switzerland, Herisau). A thermostatted glass-cell equipped with a
magnetic stirring system was used, containing a Metrohm glass electrode, a thermometric
probe, a microburet delivery tube and a salt bridge connected with the reference cell filled
with 0.1 mol�dm-3 KCl solution in which a saturated calomel electrode was dipped. The
titroprocessor and electrode were calibrated with standard buffer solutions, potassium
hydrogen phthalate (pH = 4.008) and a mixture of KH2PO4 and Na2HPO4 (pH = 6.865)
at 25.0 �C.
2.3 Procedure and Measurements
The following mixtures were prepared and titrated potentiometrically with 0.05 mol�dm-3
NaOH solution.
(A) 40 mL of solution containing 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 ligand (IMA, amino acid, or
peptide, DNA constituents) of constant ionic strength 0.1 mol�dm-3 (adjusted with
NaNO3);
(B) 40 mL of solution containing 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 M(II) ion and 0.1 mol�dm-3
NaNO3;
(C) 40 mL of solution containing 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 M(II) ion, 2.5 9 10-3
mol�dm-3 ligand (IMA, amino acid, or peptide, DNA constituents) and
0.1 mol�dm-3, NaNO3;
(D) 40 mL of solution containing 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 Cu(II) ion, 1.25 9 10-3
mol�dm-3 IMA, 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 ligand (amino acid or peptide) and
0.1 mol�dm-3, NaNO3.
1030 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
(E) 40 mL of solution containing 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 Cu(II) ion, 1.25 9 10-3
mol�dm-3 IMA, 2.5 9 10-3 mol�dm-3 ligand (DNA constituents) and
0.1 mol�dm-3, NaNO3.
The proton association constants of the ligands were determined potentiometrically by
titrating mixture (A). The hydrolysis constants of MII (M = Cu(II), Ni(II), Co(II) and
Mn(II)) were determined by titrating mixture (B). The formation constants of M(II)–IMA
and of Cu(II)–L (L = amino acid, peptide and DNA constituents) were determined by
titrating mixture (C). The stability constants of the mixed-ligand complexes of amino acids
and peptides were determined using the potentiometric data obtained for the mixture (D).
The stability constants of the ternary complexes of DNA constituents were determined
using potentiometric data obtained from mixture (E). All titrations were performed in a
purified N2 atmosphere, using aqueous 0.05 mol�dm-3 NaOH as titrant.
The general four component equilibria can be written as follows (charges are omitted
for simplicity):
lðCuÞ þ pðIMAÞ þ qðLÞ þ rðHÞ� ðCuÞlðIMAÞpðLÞqðHÞr ð1Þ
blpqr ¼½CulðIMAÞpðLÞqðHÞr�½Cu�l½IMA�p½L�q½H�r
ð2Þ
2.4 Data Processing
Calculations were performed using the computer program MINIQUAD-75 [26]. The
stoichiometry and stability constants of the complexes formed were determined by trying
various possible composition models. The model selected gave the best statistical fit and
was chemically consistent with the titration data without giving any systematic drifts in the
magnitudes of various residuals, as described elsewhere [26]. The fitted model was tested
by comparing the experimental titration data points and the theoretical curve calculated
from the values of the acid dissociation constant of the ligand and the formation constants
of the corresponding complexes. The results are summarized in Tables 1, 2 and 3. The
species distribution diagrams were obtained using the program SPECIES [27] under the
experimental conditions employed. All measurements were carried out in our laboratory in
Cairo University.
3 Results and Discussion
Knowledge of the protonation constants of biorelevant ligands is interesting and necessary
for a complete understanding of the physiochemical behavior of bio-ligands. Therefore,
stoichiometric protonation constants of the ligands were determined under the experi-
mental conditions of (25 ± 0.1) �C and a constant ionic strength of 0.1 mol�dm-3, which
were also used to determine the stability constants of the metal(II) complexes. Copper (II)
complexes with amino acids and peptides were previously investigated under different
experimental conditions, which did not allow a meaningful comparison of the reported
stability constants and definite stoichiometries. In the present study, we redetermined the
complex formation constants of Cu(II) with amino acids and peptides under the same
conditions used to study the ternary complexes. The values obtained are consistent with
data reported in the literature [28].
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1031
123
3.1 Acid–Base Equilibria of IMA
In order to calculate the stability constants of metal complexes, the acid dissociation
constant of the ligand was first determined. Analysis of the potentiometric data of (IMA) in
the diprotonated form yields two pKa values corresponding to the carboxylate and pro-
tonated imidazole groups (Table 1). The highest pKa value is attributed to the imidazole
group (pKa1 = 7.14) and the lowest one to the carboxylate group (pKa2 = 2.83) at 25 �C
as shown in Scheme 1. These results are in agreement with previous investigation carried
out on IMA in aqueous solution at 0.1 mol�dm-3 NaClO4 (pKa1 = 7.33 and pKa2 = 3.18,
at 25 �C) [29]. The pKimd value of IMA (pKimd = 7.14) is considerably greater than that of
the imidazole-4-acetamide (pKimd = 6.41) [30], which suggests the formation of a
Table 1 Association constantsof (IMA) in aqueous solution inthe presence of 0.1 mol�dm-3
NaNO3 at temperatures from 15to 35 �C
a Standard deviations are givenin parenthesesb Sum of squares of residuals
System Temp. (�C) log10 ba Sb
IMA
(1) L� þ Hþ � HL 15 7.38 (0.04) 3.2E-7
(2) L� þ 2Hþ � H2Lþ 10.29 (0.07)
IMA
(1) L� þ Hþ � HL 20 7.25 (0.05) 2.4E-7
(2) L� þ 2Hþ � H2Lþ 10.13(0.06)
IMA
(1) L� þ Hþ � HL 25 7.12 (0.04) 3.5E-7
(2) L� þ 2Hþ � H2Lþ 9.97 (0.07)
IMA
(1) L� þ Hþ � HL 30 6.95 (0.06) 4.8E-7
(2) L� þ 2Hþ � H2Lþ 9.77 (0.08)
IMA
(1) L� þ Hþ � HL 35 6.81 (0.07) 2.3E-7
(2) L� þ 2Hþ � H2Lþ 9.61 (0.09)
Table 2 Overall formation constants and derived results for the metal complexes of IMA (as their loga-rithms), I = 0.1 mol�dm-3 (NaNO3), t = 25 �C, and bpqr = [MlLpHr]/[M]l[L]p[H]r, with standard devia-tions in parentheses
System l p ra Cu(II) Ni(II) Co(II) Mn(II)
M2þ þ L� � MLþ 1 1 0 7.00 (0.03) 6.31 (0.06) 5.26 (0.06) 4.75 (0.05)
M2þ þ 2L� � ML2 1 2 0 11.08 (0.07) 9.78 (0.04) 8.46 (0.04) 7.69 (0.06)
log10 K1 – 7.00 6.31 5.26 4.75
log10 K2 – 4.08 3.47 3.2 2.94
log10 K1 - log10 K2 – 2.92 2.84 2.06 1.81
Sc – 3.5E-7 1.2E-6 2.6E-7 3.6E-6
N.P.d 297 272 283 291
a p, q and r are the stoichiometric coefficient corresponding to metal ion, IMA and H?, respectivelyb Standard deviations are given in parenthesesc Sum of squares of residualsd Number of experimental data points
1032 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
hydrogen bond in the monoprotonated (LH) species, in this case between the carboxylate
and imidazole N3 nitrogen, increasing the pK of the more basic site.
3.2 Binary Complexes of Imidazole-4-acetic acid (IMA)
The stability constants of binary complexes of Mn2?, Co2?, Ni2? and Cu2? with (IMA)
were studied by applying potentiometric measurements. The resulting stability constants of
their complexes are shown in Table 2. These results are in agreement with a previous
investigation carried out on Ni2? and Cu2? complexation with IMA in aqueous solution
at 0.1 mol�dm-3 NaClO4. The literature log10 b values of Cu–IMA complexes are
(log10 b110 = 6.86 and log10 b120 = 12.43) and for Ni–IMA are (log10 b110 = 4.81 and
log10 b120 = 8.49), at 25 �C) [29]. The potentiometric titration curves for Mn2?, Co2?,
Ni2? and Cu2? with IMA were found to be below and well separated from that of the free
IMA ligand, confirming that complex formation occurs with liberation of protons [16, 20].
Potentiometric titration curves of IMA in the presence and absence of Cu(II) ion as a
representative example are shown in Fig. 1. The titration data as calculated for metal(II)
ions and IMA, taking into consideration all feasible theoretical models, were compared
with those experimentally obtained. The equilibrium patterns were chosen so as to lie
between the observed and the calculated data applying accurate statistical analysis
involving the sum of squares of residuals. At this point, all protonation constants were kept
constant, and the computer program MINIQUAD was applied for a second stage of
refinement. The whole titration data set obtained were fitted with different composition
models and the selected model with best statistical fit was found to consist of 1:1 and 1:2
complexes as shown in Scheme 2. This model was tested by comparing the experimental
titration data points and the theoretical curve calculated from the values of acid
O
NH
N
CH2
OH
O
NH
N
CH2
OO
NH
N
CH2
O
HH
+ H+
-
K1
+ H+
K2
++
-
Scheme 1 Acid–base equilibria of imidazole-4-acetic acid
Table 3 Atomic number, ionic radius, electronegativity and ionization potential of the investigated bivalentmetal ion
Metal ion Mn2? Co2? Ni2 Cu2?
Atomic number 25 27 28 29
Ionic radius (pm) 81 79 71 74
Electronegativity 1.55 1.88 1.91 2.00
Second ionization energy (kJ�mol-1) 1509 1646 1753 1958
Values from Ref. [28]
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1033
123
dissociation constants of IMA and formation constants of the Cu2? complex. The good fit
is an indication of the validity of the complexation model.
3.3 Visible Electronic Spectra of the Cu–IMA Complex
The spectrum of the hydrated copper(II) ion (mixture A) consists of a broad, weak band
with a maximum wavelength at 817 nm, attributed to the 2T2g / 2Eg transition [31]. The
spectral band of the binary copper(II) complex with IMA is quite different from that of the
hydrated copper(II) ion in the position of the maximum wavelength. The spectrum of the
[Cu(IMA)] complex (mixture B) shows an absorption maximum at 744 nm (Fig. 2). The
shift toward shorter wavelength in the absorption spectrum (blue shift) may be taken as
evidence, supporting the potentiometric measurements, for the interaction of IMA with
copper.
3.4 Relationships Between the Properties of Central Metal Ion and Stability
of Complexes
In an attempt to explain why a given ligand prefers binding to one metal rather than
another, it is necessary to correlate the stability constants with characteristic properties of
the metal ions such as the ionic radius, ionization energy, electronegativity and the atomic
number. We have discussed relationships between the properties of central metal ions
reported in Table 3 [32] and the stability constants of complexes. The formation constants
of MII–complexes of bivalent 3d transition metal ions with IMA are in the order:
Mn2? \ Co2? \ Ni2? \ Cu2? in accordance with the Irving–Williams order [33]. The
correlation between log10 KML and the reciprocal ionic radii (1/r) of the studied bivalent
transition metal ions was found to be almost linear. Also, a good linear correlation has been
obtained between log10 KML and the electronegativities of the metal ions under study.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume of base added
pH
Fig. 1 Potentiometric titrationcurve of the Cu–thIMA system at25 �C
1034 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
This is in accordance with the fact that increasing electronegativity of the metal ions
{Mn2? (1.55) \ Co2? (1.88) \ Ni2? (1.91) \ Cu2? (2.0)} will decrease the electronega-
tivity difference between the metal atom and the donor atom of the ligand. Thus, the
metal–ligand bond will have more covalent character, which may lead to greater stability
of the metal chelates. A good linear relationship has been obtained between log10 KML and
the second ionization potential of the bivalent metal ions under study. In general, it is noted
that the stability constant of the Cu2? complex is quite large compared to the other metals.
The ligand field will give Cu2? some extra stabilization due to tetragonal distortion of the
octahedral symmetry [34]. Thus, the log10 K value for the Cu2? complex deviates sig-
nificantly when log10 K values of metal chelates are plotted against properties of the metal
ions (Fig. 3).
O
NH
N
CH2
O
OH2
Cu2+
NH
NCH2
COOH
O
NH
N
CH2
O N
NH
CH2
O
O
OH2
Cu+ Cu
IMA
(110) (120)
Scheme 2 Complex formation equilibria of Cu–IMA complexes
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.2
0.24
0.28
500 550 600 650 700 750 800Wavelength (nm)
Abs
orba
nce
Cu(II)
Cu(IMA)
Fig. 2 Electronic spectra ofCu(II) and the Cu(II)–IMAcomplex
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1035
123
3.5 Effect of Temperature and Thermodynamics
The values obtained for the thermodynamic parameters DH�, DS� and DG�, associated with
the protonation of IMA and its complex formation with Cu(II) species, were calculated
from the temperature dependence of the data in Tables 1 and 4. The values of DH� and DS�were obtained by a linear least-squares fit of ln K versus 1/T (ln K = -DH�/RT 1 DS�/R)
leading to the intercept DS�/R and slope -DH�/R, where K is the equilibrium constant, see
Figs. 4 and 5. The main conclusions from the data can be summarized as follows.
(I) The protonation reaction 1 of the N-site of IMA is exothermic with a net negative
DG� value (Table 5). Three factors affect the protonation reaction 1 in Table 5:
(i) the neutralization reaction, which is an exothermic reaction process;
(ii) desolvation of ions, which is an endothermic process;
0
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8lo
g K
Atomic number
Fig. 3 Variation of the stability constants at 25 �C for the MII–IMA complexes with the atomic number ofthe divalent metal ions
Table 4 Formation constants forbinary complexes of (IMA) withCu(II) ions in aqueous solution inthe presence of 0.1 mol�dm-3
NaNO3 at different temperaturesfrom 15–35 �C
a Standard deviations are givenin parenthesesb Sum of squares of residuals
System Temp. (�C) log10 ba Sb
Cu–IMA 15
(1) Cu2þ þ L� � CuLþ 7.41 (0.02) 4.6E-7
(2) Cu2þ þ 2L� � CuL2 13.29 (0.04)
Cu–IMA 20
(1) Cu2þ þ L� � CuLþ 7.20 (0.04) 1.3E-7
(2) Cu2þ þ 2L� � CuL2 13.01 (0.03)
Cu–IMA 25
(1) Cu2þ þ L� � CuLþ 7.01 (0.01) 3.5E-7
(2) Cu2þ þ 2L� � CuL2 12.74 (0.03)
Cu–IMA 30
(1) Cu2þ þ L� � CuLþ 6.82 (0.02) 5.1E-7
(2) Cu2þ þ 2L� � CuL2 12.51 (0.04)
Cu–IMA 35
(1) Cu2þ þ L� � CuLþ 6.63 (0.03) 3.7E-7
(2) Cu2þ þ 2L� � CuL2 12.25 (0.05)
1036 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
(iii) the change of the configuration and arrangements of the hydrogen bonds around
the free and the protonated ligands.
(II) In most cases, the color of the solution after complex formation was observed to be
different from the colour of the ligand solution at the same pH.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0032 0.0033 0.0033 0.0034 0.0034 0.0035 0.0035
1/T
log
K
log K2
log K1
Fig. 4 Van’t Hoff plot of the protonation constants of (IMA) against 1/T
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
0.0032 0.0033 0.0033 0.0034 0.0034 0.0035 0.00351/T
log
K
log K1
log K2
Fig. 5 Van’t Hoff plot of the formation constants of Cu2? complexes with (IMA) against 1/T
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1037
123
(III) The stability constants of the Cu(II) complexes formed at different temperatures
were calculated and the average values are included in Table 4. From these results
the following conclusions can be reached. These values decrease with increasing
temperature, confirming that the complexation process is more favorable at lower
temperatures. It is known that the divalent metal ions exist in solution as octahedral
hydrated species [35], and the obtained values of DH and DS can then be considered
as the sum of two contributions: (a) release of H2O molecules and (b) metal–ligand
bond formation. From these results the following conclusions can be made.
(1) Table 2 shows that the (log10 K1 - log10 K2) values are usually positive, since
the coordination sites of the metal ions are more freely available for binding of
the first molecule than for the second one.
(2) For the same ligand at constant temperature, the stability of the chelates
increase in the order Cu2? [ Ni2? [ Co2? [ Mn2? [33]. This order largely
reflects the changes in the enthalpy of complex formation across the series
from a combination of the influence of both the polarizing ability of the metal
ion [36] and the crystal field stabilization energies [35].
(3) All values of DG� for complexation are negative (Table 5), indicating that the
chelation process proceeds spontaneously.
(4) The negative values of DH� show that the chelation process is exothermic,
indicating that the complexation reactions are favored at low temperatures.
Furthermore, when a coordinate bond is formed between the ligand and the
metal ion, the electron density on the metal ion generally increases.
Consequently, its affinity for a subsequent ligand decreases, leading to
increases in DG� and DH� of complexation.
(5) It is noted that generally �DG�1 [ � DG�2 and� DH�1 [ � DH�2 (Table 5).
This may be attributed to the steric hindrance produced by the entrance of a
second molecule into coordination.
3.6 Species Distribution Curves of Cu–IMA Complexes
Estimation of equilibrium concentrations of metal(II) complexes as a function of pH
provides a useful picture of metal ion binding in solutions. All of the species distributions
were calculated with the aid of the Species computer program [27]. The concentrations of
Table 5 Thermodynamic parameters for the association equilibria of IMA and complex formation of Cu–IMA complexes
Equilibriuma DH� (kJ�mol-1) DS� (J�K-1�mol-1) DG� (kJ�mol-1)
IMA
(1) L� þ Hþ � LH -48.87 -27.95 -40.54
(2) LHþ Hþ � LHþ -9.52 22.59 -16.25
Cu-IMA
(3) Cu2þ þ L� � CuLþ -65.91 -86.98 -39.98
(4) CuLþ þ L� � CuL2 -21.76 36.95 -32.77
a L denotes imidazole-4-acetic acid (IMA)
1038 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
metal–ligand complexes increase with increasing pH. The species distribution pattern for
the Cu–(IMA) complex, taken as a representative of metal ligand complexes, is given in
Fig. 6. The Cu(IMA) complex starts to form at pH * 1 and reaches its maximum con-
centration of 74 % at pH * 3.4, while Cu(IMA)2 complex species reaches a maximum
concentration of 97 % at pH * 8.5.
3.7 Ternary Complex Formation Equilibria Involving Amino Acids
Ternary complex formation may proceed either through a stepwise or simultaneous
mechanism depending on the chelating ability of IMA and the other ligands. The
formation constants of the 1:1 copper(II) complexes with IMA and amino acids are of
the same order of magnitude, Table 6. Consequently, the coordination of IMA and
amino acid (HL) will proceed simultaneously. The titration data of the ternary com-
plexes with amino acids and IMA are fit satisfactorily with formation of the species
Cu(IMA), Cu(IMA)2, Cu(L), Cu(L)2 and Cu(IMA)(L). Threonine forms, in addition to
the just mentioned complexes, the Cu(IMA)(LH-1) species. The latter complex is
formed through induced ionization of the b-alcoholato group, as mentioned in the
literature [37].
Phenylalanine forms a more stable complex than alanine, although the amino group of
the former molecule is less basic than that of the latter molecule. This may be due to some
stacking interactions between the phenyl group of phenylalanine and the aromatic moiety
of IMA as shown in structure (I). This will contribute to the stabilization of the formed
complex.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12pH
% S
peci
es
Cu(II)
[Cu(IMA)]+
[Cu(IMA)2]
[Cu(OH)]+
Fig. 6 Concentration distribution of various species as a function of pH in the Cu–IMA system at theconcentration 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3, I = 0.1 mol�dm-3 (NaNO3) and t = 25 ± 0.1 �C
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1039
123
Both imidazole and methylamine are monodentate ligands; the stability constant of the
monodentate methylamine complex is higher than that of the imidazole ligand. The
observed extra stability of the methylamine complex may be due to higher basicity of its
amino group (log10 b = 10.55) compared with that of the imidazole group (log10 b =
7.04).
The stability constants of Cu(IMA)–amino acid systems are larger than those for the
corresponding monodentate methylamine and imidazole complexes. This indicates that the
amino acids are coordinating as bidentate ligands through the amino and carboxylate
groups (Scheme 3).
Histamine and histidine have been shown to form both protonated (1111) and depro-
tonated (1110) complex species. The acid dissociation constants of the protonated species
are given by the following equation [38]:
pKH ¼ log10 b1111 � log10 b1110 ð4ÞThe pKa values for the histamine and histidine complexes are (5.23) and (5.73),
respectively, being lower than those of the protonated amino group (NHþ3 ) in histamine and
histidine ligands (pKa = 9.80 and 9.50, respectively), but closer to those of the protonated
imidazole in histamine and histidine ligands (pKa = 6.12 and 6.05) respectively, consid-
ering the increase in acidity due to complex formation. This reveals that the proton in the
protonated complex should be located mainly on the imidazole group.
Lysine forms the ternary complexes 1110 and 1111. The formation constant of the
species 1110 is in the same order of the ternary complexes of the amino acids, indicating
that lysine is a bidentate ligand and coordinates by both amino and carboxylate groups,
leaving the extra amino group susceptible to protonation. The pKa value of the protonated
species 1111 is 8.09 for Cu(IMA)–lysine.
3.8 Ternary Complex Formation Equilibria Involving Amides
Ternary complex formation of amides also proceeds through a simultaneous mechanism.
The species detected are Cu(IMA), Cu(IMA)2, Cu(L), Cu(LH-1), Cu(IMA)(L) and
Cu(IMA)(LH-1) and their formation constants are given in Table 6. The amide may form
the Cu(IMA)(L) complex by coordination through the amine and carbonyl groups. On
increasing the pH, the coordination sites should switch from the carbonyl oxygen to amide
nitrogen. Such changes in coordination centers are now well documented [39, 40].
The amide groups undergo deprotonation and Cu(IMA)(LH-1) complexes are formed.
The pKH values are calculated by the following Eq. 5
pKH ¼ log10 b1110 � log10 b111�1 ð5ÞThe pKH values of the amide complexes are 6.08, 6.32 and 9.83 for glycinamide,
glycylglycine and glutamine, respectively. It is noteworthy that the pKH for the
N
NH
Cu
O
OO
CH
O
NH2
CH2
(I)
1040 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
Table 6 Stability constants of the ternary species in the CuII–IMA–amino acid, amide or DNA constituentsystems, and proton-association constants and their binary stability constants
System l p q ra log10 bblog10 bCu
CuL log10 bCuCuL2
Sc
Cu(H2O)2þ6
1 0 0 -1 -6.44 (0.07) – 9.6E-7
IMA 0 1 0 1 7.12 (0.04) 7.43 13.36 3.0E-7
0 1 0 2 9.97 (0.07)
1 1 0 0 7.01 (0.01) 3.5E-7
1 2 0 0 12.74 (0.03)
Glycine 0 0 1 1 9.6 (0.01) 8.19 14.96 1.5E-7
0 0 1 2 11.93 (0.03)
1 1 1 0 15.22 (0.06) 5.2E-7
Alanine 0 0 1 1 9.69 (0.01) 7.99 14.62 2.6E-6
0 0 1 2 11.88 (0.02)
1 1 1 0 15.68 (0.04) 5.3E-7
Proline 0 0 1 1 10.52 (0.01) 8.82 16.15 4.4E-8
0 0 1 2 12.03 (0.02)
1 1 1 0 15.33 (0.05) 1.2E-7
Iso-leucine 0 0 1 1 9.76 (0.01) 8.23 15.27 3.4E-8
0 0 1 2 12.22 (0.01)
1 1 1 0 15.41 (0.04) 2.2E-7
Valine 0 0 1 1 9.57 (0.01) 8.16 14.97 6.9E-8
0 0 1 2 11.70 (0.03)
1 1 1 0 15.60 (0.04) 1.7E-7
Phenylalanine 0 0 1 1 9.12 (0.01) 7.86 14.81 8.0E-8
0 0 1 2 11.01 (0.03)
1 1 1 0 17.14 (0.01) 1.7–7
Threonine 0 0 1 1 9.06 (0.01) 8.32 14.92 7.9E-8
0 0 1 2 11.03 (0.02)
1 1 1 0 14.45 (0.1) 1.1E-6
1 1 1 –1 4.94 (0.09)
Lysine 0 0 1 1 10.52 (0.03) 14.10 19.94 1.9E-8
0 0 1 2 19.65 (0.02)
0 0 1 3 21.91 (0.04)
1 1 1 0 16.99 (0.05) 5.3E-7
1 1 1 1 25.08 (0.35)
Histamine 0 0 1 1 9.80 (0.01) 9.55 16.10 1.8E-7
0 0 1 2 15.91 (0.01)
1 1 1 0 15.35 (0.02) 1.6E-7
1 1 1 1 20.58 (0.04)
Histidine 0 0 1 1 9.150 (0.01) 10.66 18.96 2.4E-8
0 0 1 2 15.55 (0.01)
1 1 1 0 17.92 (0.09) 1.5E-7
1 1 1 1 23.65 (0.1)
Methionine 0 0 1 1 9.10 (0.01) 7.86 14.60 8.9E-8
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1041
123
glycinamide complex is lower than the pKHs of other amides, which signifies that a more
bulky substituent group on the amides may serve to hinder the structural change in going
from protonated to deprotonated complexes. The pKH of the glutamine complex, on the
other hand, is exceptionally, relatively higher than the others. This is due to the formation
Table 6 continued
System l p q ra log10 bblog10 bCu
CuL log10 bCuCuL2
Sc
0 0 1 2 11.08 (0.03)
1 1 1 0 14.33 (0.09) 8.6E-7
Aspartic acid 0 0 1 1 9.68 (0.01) 8.84 14.96 3.9E-8
0 0 1 2 13.35 (0.01)
1 1 1 0 15.04 (0.05) 2.6E-7
Methylamine 0 0 1 1 10.55 (0.004) 6.82 11.56 8.9E-9
1 1 1 0 12.21 (0.09) 3.6E-6
1 1 2 0 16.47 (0.1)
Imidazole 0 0 1 1 7.04 (0.02) 4.20 7.62 2.3E-7
1 1 1 0 9.71 (0.04) 7.4E-7
1 1 2 0 13.69 (0.06)
Glycinamide 0 0 1 1 7.60 (0.01) 4.70 – 8.5E-8
1 1 1 0 11.75 (0.08) 1.2E-6
1 1 1 –1 4.85 (0.04)
Glycylglycine 0 0 1 1 7.99 (0.006) 5.40 – 8.5E-8
1 1 1 0 12.80 (0.09) 1.6E-6
1 1 1 –1 6.48 (0.05)
Glutamine 0 0 1 1 8.95 (0.008) 7.69 – 4.5E-8
1 1 1 0 13.74 (0.07) 7.6E-7
1 1 1 –1 3.91 (0.08)
Thymine 0 0 1 1 9.53 (0.01) 5.77 – 3.4E-8
1 1 1 0 12.72 (0.05) 4.4E-7
1 1 2 0 16.57 (0.07)
Thymidine 0 0 1 1 9.50 (0.02) 5.87 – 6.2E-8
1 1 1 0 12.60 (0.07) 8.1E-7
1 1 2 0 16.39 (0.09)
Uridine 0 0 1 1 9.01 (0.02) 4.32 – 2.9E-8
1 1 1 0 12.11 (0.06) 3.4E-7
1 1 2 0 16.42 (0.04)
Uracil 0 0 1 1 9.28 (0.006) 5.49 – 3.4E-8
1 1 1 0 12.31 (0.04)
1 1 2 0 16.52 (0.07)
Inosine 0 0 1 1 8.55 (0.02) 4.01 – 5.6E-8
1 1 1 0 12.02 (0.03) 5.8E-6
1 1 1 1 18.28 (0.1)
a l, p, q and r are stoichiometric coefficients corresponding to CuII, IMA, other ligand and H?, respectivelyb Standard deviations are given in parenthesesc Sum of square of residuals
1042 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
of a seven membered chelate ring, which would be more strained and less favored. The
speciation diagram of the glycylglycine complex is given in Fig. 7. The mixed ligand
species [Cu(IMA)L] (1110) starts to form at pH * 3.2 and, with increasing pH, its con-
centration increases reaching a maximum of 22 % at pH = 6. Further increase of pH is
accompanied by a decrease in [Cu(IMA)L] (1110) complex concentration and an increase
of [Cu(IMA)LH-1] (111-1) complex concentration.
3.9 Ternary Complex Formation Equilibria Involving DNA Units
In the ternary complexes of DNA constituents (HL), the formation of a ternary complex
was ascertained by comparing the experimental potentiometric data with the theoretically
calculated (simulated) curve. Figure 8 presents such a comparison for the inosine system,
where the experimental data coincide with the theoretical curve. This supports the
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12pH
% S
peci
es
Cu(II)
[Cu(IMA)]+
[Cu(IMA)(glyglyH-1)]-
[Cu(IMA)2][Cu(IMA)(glygly)] [Cu(glyglyH-1)]
Fig. 7 Concentration distribution of various species as a function of pH in the Cu(IMA)–glycylglycinesystem at the concentration 1.25 9 10-3 mol�dm-3, I = 0.1 mol�dm-3 (NaNO3) and t = 25 �C
O ON
HN HN
O
O
OH2
Cu
N
NH
N
NH2O
Cu
O(1110)
CH2
(1110)
Scheme 3 Coordination modes of imidazole as monodentate ligand and glycine as bidentate ligand withthe CuII–IMA complex
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1043
123
formation of a mixed-ligand complex. Thus, the formation of ternary complex can be
described by the following equilibrium (charges are omitted for simplicity):
Cuþ IMAþ L� Cu IMAð ÞL ð6Þ
Inosine may become protonated at N(7) with formation of [N(1)H–N(7)H] monoca-
tions. In the present study, only the pKa of N(1)H was determined since the pKa of N(7)H is
too low to be detected by the potentiometric technique. In the acidic pH-range, N(1)
remains protonated while the metal ion is attached to N(7). The gradual change from N(7)-
binding to N(1)-binding for metal complexes with increasing pH has been rather exten-
sively documented by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) [41] spectroscopic measurements. This means that these binding sites are
pH-dependent therefore it is proposed that N(1) serves as a coordination site in the mixed
ligand complexes of inosine at higher pHs in agreement with Martin et al. [42]. The data
show the formation of the ternary complexes with stoichiometric coefficients 1110 and
1111. The pKa value of N(1)H group of the protonated complex (log10 b1111 - log10 b1110)
is 6.26. This indicates acidification of the N(1)H site by 2.17 units through coordination
with the Cu–IMA complex.
The pyrimidinic species (uridine, uracil, thymine and thymidine) have a dissociable
proton at N(3). The acid dissociation constants obtained from this study were compared
with that of the N(1) proton of inosine. The purinic derivative (inosine) is slightly more
acidic than the pyrimidinic species (uridine, uracil, thymine and thymidine). This can be
related to the existence of the anionic form of purinic derivatives in a higher number of
resonance forms due to the presence of two condensed rings in this ligand (inosine). Based
on the existing data, uracil, uridine, thymine and thymidine ligate in the deprotonated form
as monoanions, through N(3), and they do not form protonated complexes. The thymine
and thymidine complexes are more stable than those of uracil and uridine, most probably
01 1.5
Volume of base added
Experimental pH
Calculated pH
2 2.5 30 0.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
pH
Fig. 8 Potentiometric titration curve for the Cu(IMA)–inosine system
1044 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
due to the higher basicity of the N(3) site of thymine and thymidine, resulting from the
inductive effect of the extra electron-donating methyl group. Mixed ligand complexes of
nucleosides are less stable than their corresponding bases as evident from the stability
constants given in Table 6. The presence of a sugar residue imposes steric hindrance in
nucleosides for their complexation with metal ions and reduces the overall basicity of
metal complexes of nucleosides considerably. No interaction with the ribose hydroxyls is
observed, showing preference of Cu2? for the soft bases N(7) and N(1).
3.10 Comparison of the Stability Constant of the Ternary Complexes with Those
of the Binary Complexes
Different methods are known that can be used to estimate the formation of mixed-ligand
complexes [43]. The relative stability of the mixed-ligand complexes as compared to those
of the corresponding binary species can be evaluated in different ways.
3.10.1 The Parameter (Dlog10 K)
Dlog10 K has been widely accepted and used for many years [44], and the advantages in
using Dlog10 K in comparing stabilities of ternary and binary complexes have been
reviewed. The parameter Dlog10 K expresses the effect of the bonded primary ligand
towards an incoming secondary ligand (L). One expects to obtain negative values for
Dlog10 K (Table 7) since more coordination positions are available for the bonding of
ligand (L) in the binary than in the ternary complexes. This indicates that the secondary
ligand (L), amino acid, peptide or DNA, form more stable complexes with the copper(II)
ion alone than with the CuII–IMA complex. The Dlog10 K values for deprotonated ternary
complexes are given by Eqs. 7 and 8:
Cu(IMA)þ Cu(L)� Cu(IMA)(L)þ Cu ð7Þ
Dlog10KCu IMAð ÞL ¼ log10bCu IMAð Þ Lð Þ � ðlog10bCuðIMAÞÞ � ðlog10bCu Lð ÞÞ ð8Þ
The Dlog10 K value for protonated ternary complexes is given by Eqs. 9 and 10:
Cu(IMA)þ Cu(HL)� Cu(IMA)(HL)þ Cu ð9Þ
Dlog10KCu IMAð ÞHL ¼ log10bCu IMAð Þ HLð Þ � ðlog10bCuðIMAÞÞ � ðlog10bCu HLð ÞÞ ð10Þ
The statistical value of Dlog10 Koh for a regular octahedral (oh) coordination sphere is
-0.4 [45]. For the distorted octahedron (do) of Cu(aq)2? with two different bidentate
ligands, the statistical value was deduced as being Dlog10 Koh/Cu ffi-0.9 [45]. All values of
Dlog10 K for the ternary complexes studied in this paper are listed in Table 7. The negative
values obtained for Dlog10 K are found to follow the order: tridentate (as orni-
thine) [ bidentate (as glycine) [ monodentate (as imidazole) ligand. This can be justified
by the fact that Cu–IMA provides only two available coordination sites.
The Dlog10 K value for the ternary complex of phenylalanine is positive. This may be
explained on the premise that the noncoordinating aromatic side groups of these amino
acids can approach the aromatic moiety of IMA and exert a stacking interaction, since the
presence of an aromatic ring above the Cu(II) coordination plane is probably essential for
preferential formation of ternary complexes.
The Dlog10 K value for the induced deprotonated amide complex can be calculated
using Eq. 11:
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1045
123
Dlog10K ¼ log10b111�1 � log10b1100 � log10b101�1 ð11ÞThe Dlog10 K values for the induced deprotonated amide ternary complexes are more
negative than -0.9. This may be taken as an indication that the formation of the ternary
amide complexes is less favored than that of binary ones. This may be explained on the
premise that the inducely deprotonated amide is coordinated with the free CuII ion as a
tridentate ligand, whereas in the ternary complex, two coordination sites are available in
the Cu–IMA complex.
3.10.2 Disproportionation Constant (log10 X)
However, besides Dlog10 K, the ‘‘disproportionation’’ constant log10 X (Eqs. 12 and 13)
[46] can be used to quantify the stability of ternary complexes. The advantages and
disadvantages arising from the use of log10 X have been discussed [47]. The values of log10
X for Cu(IMA)L complexes are defined by Eqs. 12 and 13 (Table 7):
Table 7 Evaluated values of log10 b1110, log10 bstat, Dlog10 b, Dlog10 K, and log10 X for the formation of theternary complexes [Cu(IMA)(L)] at ionic strength 0.1 mol�dm-3 NaNO3 and t = 25 �C
Ligand log10 b1110
(experimental)log10 bstat
a
(calculated)Dlog10 bb Dlog10 Kc log10 Xd
Glycine 15.22 14.46 0.76 -0.40 2.12
Alanine 15.68 14.29 1.39 0.26 3.38
Phenylalanine 17.14 14.41 2.73 1.85 6.07
Isoleucine 15.52 14.62 0.70 -0.34 2.01
Valine 15.60 14.47 1.13 0.01 2.87
Proline 15.33 15.06 0.27 -0.92 1.15
Methionine 14.33 14.28 0.05 -0.96 0.70
Aspartic 15.04 14.46 0.58 -1.23 1.76
Threonine 14.45 14.44 0.01 -1.30 0.62
Histidine 17.92 16.46 0.23 -0.17 3.52
Lysine 16.99 16.95 0.04 -4.45 0.68
Glycinamide 11.75 – – -0.38 (-1.0)e –
Glycylglycine 12.80 – – -0.03 (-2.09)e –
Glutamine 13.74 – – -1.38 (-1.94)e –
Thymine 12.72 – – -0.48 –
Thymidine 12.60 – – -0.70 –
Uridine 12.11 – – 0.36 –
Uracil 12.35 – – -0.57 –
Inosine 12.02 – – 0.58
a log10 bstat = log10 2 ? (1/2)log10 b1020 ? (1/2)log10 b1200
b Dlog10 b = log10 b1110 - log10 bstat
c Dlog10 K = log10 b1110 - log10 b1100 - log10 b1010
d log10 X = (2 log10 b1110 - log10 b1020 - log10 b1200)e These Dlog10 K are for the induced deprotonated amide (Dlog10 K = log10 b111-1 - log10 b1100 -log10 b101-1)
1046 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
Cu IMAð Þ2þCu Lð Þ2 � 2 Cu IMAð Þ Lð Þ; XCu HMIð Þ Lð Þ ¼Cu IMAð Þ Lð Þ½ �2
Cu IMAð Þ2� �
Cu Lð Þ2� � ð12Þ
log10XCu IMAð ÞðLÞ ¼ 2 log10bCu IMAð Þ Lð Þ � ðlog10bCu IMAð Þ2 þ log10bCu Lð Þ2Þ ð13Þ
Here it is enough to note that for the calculation of log10 X (Eq. 13), the constants of the
binary 1:2 parent complexes must be known and these are often not available, e.g., for
nucleotides and peptides. However, for the following examples of ternary complexes
formed by simple bidentate ligand (IMA) and some selected bio-relevant ligands, the
values of Dlog10 K and log10 X lead to the same conclusions. On statistical grounds [43],
considerably more positive log10 X values indicate marked stabilities of the mixed com-
plexes. The statistical value for X is 4, i.e., log10 X = 0.6 (Eq. 11) [46]. A heteroaromatic
N base is essential for the high stability of a ternary complex [43, 47–49]. This was
attributed to p back-bonding from the metal ion to the aromatic ligand [50, 51]. This is in
accordance with the stabilities of the ternary complexes formed by Cu(Pyr) with 2-pic-
olylamine, bipyridyl and 2-aminomethylimidazole [49].
3.10.3 Stabilization Constant (Dlog10 b)
The stability of the ternary complexes studied is also interpreted using a statistical method
[43] according to Eq. 14:
log10bstat: calc:ð Þ ¼ log102þ 1=2ð Þlog10b1020 þ 1=2ð Þlog10b1200 ð14Þ
The stabilization constant (Dlog10 b), which results from the difference of the stability
constant measured for the mixed ligand complex and that calculated from statistical
grounds, was calculated using Eq. 15:
D log10 b ¼ log10 bmeas: � log10 bcalc: ð15ÞThe values of log10 bstat for the mixed ligand complexes detected in this study are
shown in Table 7. The large differences of Dlog10 b values (log10 b1110 - log10 bstat)
indicate that the Cu(IMA)L system is more stable than both Cu(IMA)2 and Cu(L)2, as
expected on the statistical basis.
4 Conclusions
The present investigation characterizes the formation equilibria of Cu(II) complexes
involving IMA and some selected bio-relevant ligands containing different functional
groups. It is hoped that the obtained data will be a significant contribution to workers
carrying out mechanistic studies in biological media. Combining the stability constants
data of such CuII complexes with amino acids, peptides and DNA constituents, it will be
possible to calculate the equilibrium distribution of the metal species in biological fluids
where all types of ligands are present simultaneously. This would form a clear basis for
understanding the mode of action of such metal species under physiological conditions.
From the above results it may be concluded that ternary complex formation proceeds
through a simultaneous mechanism. Amino acids form highly stable complexes, and the
substituent on the a-carbon atom has a significant effect on the stability of the formed
complex. The present study shows clearly that deprotonation of the peptide bond is pro-
moted by complex formation. Also, the slight difference in the side chain of the peptides
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1047
123
seems to produce dramatic differences in their behavior upon complexation. The values of
log10 K1 - log10 K2 are positive, indicating that coordination of the first ligand molecule to
the metal ion is more favorable than the bonding to the second one. Complex formation in
solution was shown to be an enthalpy driven process.
Regarding biological systems, important conclusions may be drawn from this work.
(i) Coordination of amino nitrogens or oxygen donors to Cu2? is easily achieved in the
physiological pH range, while there is no such evidence for the coordination of an ionized
amide nitrogen. (ii) In a mixed-ligand complex an ionized amide group may be formed and
coordinates only if two equatorial coordination positions of Cu2? are accessible, namely,
for the terminal amino nitrogen and the neighboring ionized amide. (iii) More positive
log10 X and less negative Dlog10 K values indicate the marked stabilities of the ternary
complexes. (iv) The substituent on the a-carbon atom (side chain) has a significant effect
on the stability of the formed complex.
References
1. Frausto da Silva, J.J.R., Williams, R.J.P.: The Biological Chemistry of the Elements; The InorganicChemistry of Life. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)
2. Bertini, I., Gray, H.B., Lippard, S.J., Valentine, J.S.: Bioinorganic Chemistry. University ScienceBooks, Mill Valley (1994)
3. Goodman Gilman, A., Goodman, L.S.: Goodman and Gilman’s the Pharmacological Basis of Thera-peutics, 10th edn. Mc-Graw Hill, New Jersey (2002)
4. Kimura, E., Kurogi, Y., Shionoya, M., Shira, M.: Synthesis, properties, and complexation of a newimidazole-pendant macrocyclic 12-membered triamine ligand. Inorg. Chem. 30, 4524–4529 (1991)
5. Schayer, R.W.: The metabolism of ring labeled histamine. J. Biol. Chem. 196, 469–475 (1952)6. Baldridge, R.C., Tourtellotte, C.D.: The metabolism of histidine. III. Urinary metabolites. J. Biol.
Chem. 233, 125–127 (1958)7. Khandelwal, J.K., Prell, G.D., Morrishow, A.M., Green, J.P.: Presence and measurement of imidaz-
oleacetic acid, a c-aminobutyric acid agonist, in rat brain and human cerebrospinal fluid. J. Neurochem.52, 1107–1113 (1989)
8. Garcıa-Raso, A., Fiol, J.J., Adrover, B., Tauler, P., Pons, A., Mata, I., Espinosa, E., Molins, E.:Reactivity of copper(II) peptide complexes with bioligands (benzimidazole and creatinine). Polyhedron22, 3255–3264 (2003)
9. Ranford, J.D., Sadler, P.J.: Cytotoxicity and antiviral activity of transition-metal salicylato complexesand crystal structure of bis(diisopropylsalicylato)(1,10-phenanthroline)copper(II). Dalton Trans. 22,3393–3399 (1993)
10. Majella, G., Vivienne, S., Malachy, M., Michael, D., Vickie, M.: Synthesis and anti-candida activity ofcopper(II) and manganese(II) carboxylate complexes: X-ray crystal structures of [Cu(sal)(bi-py)]�C2H5OH�H2O and [Cu(norb)(phen)2]�6.5H2O (salH2 = salicylic acid; norbH2 = cis-5-norborn-ene-endo-2,3-dicarboxylic acid; bipy = 2,20-bipyridine; phen = 1,10-phenanthroline). Polyhedron 18,2931–2939 (1999)
11. Saha, D.K., Sandbhor, U., Shirisha, K., Padhye, S., Deobagkar, D., Ansond, C.E., Powell, A.K.: A novelmixed-ligand antimycobacterial dimeric copper complex of ciprofloxacin and phenanthroline. Bioorg.Med. Chem. Lett. 14, 3027–3032 (2004)
12. Zoroddu, M.A., Zanetti, S., Pogni, R., Basosi, R.: An electron spin resonance study and antimicrobialactivity of copper(II)–phenanthroline complexes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 63, 291–300 (1996)
13. Sigel, H.: Metal Ions in Biological Systems, vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, New York (1974)14. Lau, S., Sarkar, B.: Kinetic studies of copper(II)-exchange from L-histidine to human serum albumin
and diglycyl-L-histidine, a peptide mimicking the copper(II)-transport site of albumin. Can. J. Chem. 53,710–715 (1975)
15. Bensichem, M.V., Farrell, N.: Activation of the trans geometry in platinum antitumor complexes.Synthesis, characterization, and biological activity of complexes with the planar ligands pyridine, N-methylimidazole, thiazole, and quinoline. Crystal and molecular structure of trans-dichlorobis(thia-zole)platinum(II). Inorg. Chem. 31, 634–639 (1992)
1048 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123
16. El-Sherif, A.A., Shoukry, M.M., Abd El-Gawad, M.M.A.: Protonation equilibria of some selected a-amino acids in DMSO–water mixture and their Cu(II)-complexes. J. Solution Chem. 42, 412–427(2013)
17. Shoukry, M.M., Khairy, E.M., El-Sherif, A.A.: Ternary complexes involving copper(II) and aminoacids, peptides and DNA constituents. The kinetics of hydrolysis of a-amino acid esters. Trans. Met.Chem. 27, 656–664 (2002)
18. El-Sherif, A.A., Aljahdali, M.: Equilibrium studies of binary and mixed-ligand complexes of zinc(II)involving 2-(aminomethyl)-benzimidazole and some bio-relevant ligands. J. Solution Chem. 41,1759–1776 (2012)
19. El-Sherif, A.A., Shoukry, M.M., van Eldik, R.: Complex formation reactions and stability constants formixed-ligand complexes of diaqua(2-picolylamine)palladium(II) with some bio-relevant ligands.J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 7, 1425–1432 (2003)
20. El-Sherif, A.A.: Mixed-ligand complexes of 2-(aminomethyl)benzimidazole palladium(II) with variousbiologically relevant ligands. J. Solution Chem. 35, 1287–1301 (2006)
21. Mahmoud, M.M.A., El-Sherif, A.A.: Complex formation equilibria between Zn(II), nitrile-tris(methylphosphonic acid) and some bio-relevant ligands. The kinetics and mechanism for zinc(II) ion promotedhydrolysis of glycine methyl ester. J. Solution Chem. 39, 639–653 (2010)
22. El-Sherif, A.A.: Mixed ligand complex formation reactions and equilibrium studies of Cu(II) withbidentate heterocyclic alcohol (N, O) and some bio-relevant ligands. J. Solution Chem. 41, 813–824(2010)
23. El-Sherif, A.A.: Coordination properties of bidentate (N, O) and tridentate (N, O, O) heterocyclicalcohols with dimethyltin(IV) ion. J. Coord. Chem. 64, 1240–1253 (2011)
24. El-Sherif, A.A., Shoukry, M.M., Hosny, W.M., Abd Al-Moghny, M.G.: Complex formation equilibriaof unusual seven-coordinate Fe(EDTA) complexes with DNA constituents and related bio-relevantligands. J. Solution Chem. 41, 813–827 (2012)
25. Welcher, F.J.: The Analytical Uses of Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid. Van Nostand, Princeton(1965)
26. Gans, P., Sabatini, A., Vacca, A.: An improved computer program for the computation of formationconstants from potentiometric data. Inorg. Chim. Acta 18, 237–239 (1976)
27. Pettit, L.D.: IUPAC Stability Constants Database. Academic Software (1993)28. Perrin, D.D.: Stability Constants of Metal–Ion Complexes. Part B. Organic Ligands. Pergamon Press,
Oxford (1979)29. Torok, I., Surdy, P., Rockenbauer, A., Korecz Jr, L., Anthony, G., Koolhaas, A., Gajda, T.: Nickel(II)-,
copper(II)- and zinc(II)-complexes of some substituted imidazole ligands. J. Inorg. Biochem. 71, 7–14(1998)
30. Zimmermann, S.C., Korthals, J.S., Cramer, K.D.: Syn and anti-oriented imidazole carboxylates asmodels for the histidine–aspartate couple in serine proteases and other enzymes. Tetrahedron 47,2649–2660 (1991)
31. Figgs, B.N.: Introduction to Ligand Fields. Interscience Publishers, New York (1996)32. Huheey, J.E.: Inorganic Chemistry—Principles of Structure and Reactivity. Harper SI Edn, New York
(1983)33. Irving, H., Williams, R.J.P.: Some factors controlling the selectivity of organic reagents. Analyst (Lond)
77, 813–829 (1952)34. Cotton, F.A., Wilkinson, G.: Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. Wiley, London (1962)35. Phillips, C.S.G., Williams, R.J.P.: Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2, p. 268. Oxford University Press, Oxford
(1966)36. Harlly, F.R., Burgess, R.M., Alcock, R.M.: Solution Equilibria, p. 257. Ellis Harwood, Chichester
(1980)37. Sigel, H., Martin, R.B.: Coordinating properties of the amide bond. Stability and structure of metal ion
complexes of peptides and related ligands. Chem. Rev. 82, 385–426 (1982)38. Sovago, I.: In: Burger, K. (ed.) Biocoordination Chemistry. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1990)39. Pettit, L.D., Gregor, J.E., Kozlowski, H.: Perspectives in Bioinorganic Chemistry, vol. 1, pp. 1–41. Jai
Press Ltd, Greenwich (1991)40. El-Sherif, A.A., Shoukry, M.M.: Ternary copper(II) complexes involving 2-(aminomethyl)-benzimid-
azole and some bio-relevant ligands. Equilibrium studies and kinetics of hydrolysis for glycine methylester under complex formation. Inorg. Chim. Acta 360, 473–487 (2007)
41. Maskos, K.: The interaction of metal ions with nucleic acids. A nuclear magnetic resonance relaxationtime study of the copper(II)–inosine-50-monophosphate system in solution. Acta Biochim. Polonica28(2), 183–200 (1981)
J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050 1049
123
42. Martin, R.B., Mariam, Y.H.: Metal Ions in Biological Systems, vol. 8, pp. 57–125. Marcel Dekker, NewYork (1979)
43. Sigel, H.: Metal Ions in Biological Systems, vol. 2. Marcel Dekker, New York (1973)44. Sigel, H.: Stability, structure and reactivity of mixed ligand complexes in solution. In: Banerjea, D. (ed.)
Coordination Chemistry, vol. 20, pp. 27–45. IUPAC/Pergamon Press, Oxford (1980)45. Sigel, H.: Ternary Cu2? complex: stability, structure and reactivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 14,
394–402 (1975)46. DeWitt, R., Watters, J.I.: Spectrophotometric investigation of a mixed complex of copper(II) ion with
oxalate ion and ethylenediamine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76, 3810–3814 (1954)47. Martin, R.B., Prados, R.: Some factors influencing mixed complex formation. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 36,
1665–1670 (1974)48. Munakata, M., Harada, M., Niina, S.: Stability enhancement of mixed-ligand copper(II), nickel(II), and
cobalt(II) complexes with 2,20-bipyridyl and b-diketonates. Inorg. Chem. 15, 1727–1729 (1976)49. Maggiore, R., Musumeci, S., Rizzarelli, E., Sammartano, S.: Complexes of Cu2? with 2,20-dipyridyl
and cyclohexane-1,1-dicarboxylic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 18, 155–158 (1976)50. Walker, F.A., Sigel, H., McCormick, D.B.: Spectral properties of mixed-ligand copper(II) complexes
and their corresponding binary parent complexes. Inorg. Chem. 11, 2756–2763 (1972)51. Sigel, H., Huber, P.R., Griesser, R.: Ternary complexes in solution. IX. Stability-increasing effect of the
pyridyl and imidazole groups on the formation of mixed-ligand copper(II)–pyrocatecholate complexes.Inorg. Chem. 10, 945–947 (1971)
1050 J Solution Chem (2013) 42:1028–1050
123