postcesarean analgesia

6
REVIEW Post-caesarean analgesia Sarah Kwok a , Hao Wang b , Ban Leong Sng a, b, * a Department of Women's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore b Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore Keywords: Caesarean section Pain Regional anaesthesia Opioid summary Post-caesarean section analgesia is centred on the concept of multimodal analgesia. The analgesic regimen should provide optimal pain relief with minimal maternal side effects and minimal infant exposure via breastfeeding. Neuraxial opioids (morphine, diamorphine, fentanyl, pethidine) are utilized since regional techniques are commonly administered during caesarean section. Systemic analgesia using opioid based patient controlled analgesia (morphine, fentanyl) is commonly used when general anaesthesia is administered during caesarean section. To reduce opioid adverse effects, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inammatory agents are commonly prescribed concomitantly. Increasingly, local anaesthetic blocks are used such as the transversus abdominis plane block to improve analgesia espe- cially when general anaesthesia is administered or neuraxial morphine is not used. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Management of post-operative pain is critical in mothers un- dergoing caesarean delivery, as adequate pain relief is required for mothers to quickly regain mobility and begin to care for the newborn. Failure to do so may increase the maternal risk for thromboembolic events, and may adversely affect the success of breast feeding. In addition, severe acute pain after caesarean de- livery may progress to chronic pain and therefore requires effective management. 1 An ideal analgesia regimen would provide optimal pain relief with minimal maternal side effects and minimal infant exposure via breast milk, and is easy to administer. While the approach to post-caesarean pain has evolved signicantly over the years encompassing a wide variety of analgesics, techniques, and regimens, the current trend is towards the use of a balanced, multimodal analgesia. This review will examine the evidence for commonly used drugs and techniques, as well as new developments in post-caesarean analgesia. 2. Multimodal analgesia Multimodal analgesia utilizes analgesics acting on different aspects of the pain pathway. Hence patients can receive the benets of a variety of analgesics with differing mechanisms of action which in combination can have additive or even synergistic effects but with a reduction in side effects experienced as lower doses of each class of drug are needed. 2 For example, non-steroidal anti-inam- matory drugs (NSAIDs) are routinely prescribed alongside neu- raxial morphine as the combination has been shown to provide improved post-operative analgesia. 3e6 Huang et al. demonstrated that NSAIDs are particularly effective at reducing the visceral pain of uterine cramps that may follow delivery. 6 3. Neuraxial analgesia Regional anaesthesia accounts for 91.8% of caesarean delivery in 2011 in the United Kingdom. 7 It provides a safe and effective method of administering neuraxial opioid analgesia with a well- dened side effect prole. Several large reviews and studies have concluded that neuraxial opioids provide higher quality analgesia compared with the intravenous route. 8e11 A number of opioids are currently in use and they differ in their potency, duration of action and side effects. Intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil whilst providing excellent intra-operative conditions have short-lived analgesic effects due to their high lipid solubility and rapid up- take into the dorsal horn; therefore they provide little post- operative analgesia. In contrast, morphine has low lipid solubility and penetrates neural tissue slowly resulting in a longer duration of action. However, its rostral spread within the subarachnoid space by bulk ow could lead to complications such as delayed respiratory depression. * Corresponding author. KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, 229899 Singapore, Singapore. Tel.: þ65 6563941081; fax: þ65 62912661. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (B.L. Sng). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tacc http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2014.10.001 2210-8440/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 4 (2014) 189e194

Upload: sarah-owens

Post on 13-Nov-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Article anesthesia & critical care

TRANSCRIPT

  • algeptim. Nearet cod duato

    d suthes

    1. Introduction

    Management of post-operative pain isdergoing caesarean delivery, as adequate p

    andcreasedversecute pnd thegimen

    Multimodal analgesia utilizes analgesics acting on differentaspects of the pain pathway. Hence patients can receive the benets

    sarean delivery insafe and effectivegesia with a well-and studies have

    r quality analgesiaber of opioids areduration of action

    providing excellent intra-operative conditions have short-livedanalgesic effects due to their high lipid solubility and rapid up-take into the dorsal horn; therefore they provide little post-operative analgesia. In contrast, morphine has low lipid solubilityand penetrates neural tissue slowly resulting in a longer duration ofaction. However, its rostral spread within the subarachnoid spaceby bulk ow could lead to complications such as delayedrespiratory depression.

    * Corresponding author. KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit TimahRoad, 229899 Singapore, Singapore. Tel.: 65 6563941081; fax: 65 62912661.

    Contents lists availab

    Trends in Anaesthesi

    .e

    Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 4 (2014) 189e194E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (B.L. Sng).2. Multimodal analgesiaand side effects. Intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil whilstapproach to post-caesarean pain has evolved signicantly over theyears encompassing a wide variety of analgesics, techniques, andregimens, the current trend is towards the use of a balanced,multimodal analgesia. This review will examine the evidence forcommonly used drugs and techniques, as well as newdevelopments in post-caesarean analgesia.

    Regional anaesthesia accounts for 91.8% of cae2011 in the United Kingdom.7 It provides amethod of administering neuraxial opioid analdened side effect prole. Several large reviewsconcluded that neuraxial opioids provide highecompared with the intravenous route.8e11 A numcurrently in use and they differ in their potency,pain relief with minimal maternal side effects and minimal infantexposure via breast milk, and is easy to administer. While the

    3. Neuraxial analgesiamanagement.1 An ideal analgesia remothers to quickly regain mobilitynewborn. Failure to do so may inthromboembolic events, and may abreast feeding. In addition, severe alivery may progress to chronic pain ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2014.10.0012210-8440/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.critical in mothers un-ain relief is required forbegin to care for thethe maternal risk forly affect the success ofain after caesarean de-refore requires effectivewould provide optimal

    of a variety of analgesics with differingmechanisms of actionwhichin combination can have additive or even synergistic effects butwith a reduction in side effects experienced as lower doses of eachclass of drug are needed.2 For example, non-steroidal anti-inam-matory drugs (NSAIDs) are routinely prescribed alongside neu-raxial morphine as the combination has been shown to provideimproved post-operative analgesia.3e6 Huang et al. demonstratedthat NSAIDs are particularly effective at reducing the visceral painof uterine cramps that may follow delivery.6Post-caesarean analgesia

    Sarah Kwok a, Hao Wang b, Ban Leong Sng a, b, *

    a Department of Women's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singaporeb Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore

    Keywords:Caesarean sectionPainRegional anaesthesiaOpioid

    s u m m a r y

    Post-caesarean section anregimen should provide oexposure via breastfeedingsince regional techniquesusing opioid based patienanaesthesia is administerenon-steroidal anti-inammanaesthetic blocks are usecially when general anaesREVIEW

    journal homepage: wwwsia is centred on the concept of multimodal analgesia. The analgesical pain relief with minimal maternal side effects and minimal infanturaxial opioids (morphine, diamorphine, fentanyl, pethidine) are utilizedcommonly administered during caesarean section. Systemic analgesia

    ntrolled analgesia (morphine, fentanyl) is commonly used when generalring caesarean section. To reduce opioid adverse effects, paracetamol andry agents are commonly prescribed concomitantly. Increasingly, localch as the transversus abdominis plane block to improve analgesia espe-ia is administered or neuraxial morphine is not used.

    2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    le at ScienceDirect

    a and Critical Care

    lsevier .com/locate/ tacc

  • ia a3.1. Intrathecal opioids

    Opioids administered into the subarachnoid space act on themureceptors in the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn by sup-pressing excitatory neuropeptide release from C bres.12 Intra-thecal morphine has been given in doses ranging from 0.075 mg13

    to 0.5 mg14 providing highly effective post-operative analgesia.However, there appears to be a ceiling analgesic effect demon-strated by several studies. A meta-analysis of intrathecal opioidsrevealed high quality analgesia provided by 0.1e0.2 mg of intra-thecal morphine but no additional benet above 0.2 mg.9 Mediantime to rst request for supplemental analgesia was 27 h (range11e29 h). Additionally, intrathecal morphine at doses of 0.05, 0.1and 0.2 mg reduced pain scores and decreased consumption ofsupplemental analgesia from 0 to 24 h postoperatively in all com-parisons. Palmer et al. randomized 108 women undergoing electivecaesarean section to receive 1 of 9 different doses of intrathecalmorphine ranging from 0.025 to 0.5 mg with intravenous (IV) pa-tient controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption as primaryoutcome.13 The authors demonstrated the 0.075 mg group used45.7 mg less morphine compared with the control group but therewas no signicant difference in PCA usewith doses above 0.075mg.Cardoso et al. concluded that a 0.1 mg dose of intrathecal morphinewas optimal but also found doses of 0.025e0.05 mg combined witha non-steroidal anti-inammatory drug to be effective.3 However,there are studies which have reported that in a small percentage ofwomen, doses of 0.1 mg may be inadequate. Swart et al. found thatin women who were given 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine duringtheir elective caesarean section, the majority used less than 10 mgof PCAmorphine in the post-operative period but 10% of them usedmore than 40 mg.15 Although intrathecal morphine is an effectiveform of analgesia, monitoring of pain scores, a dedicated acute painservice and provision of multimodal analgesia is still required.

    Despite superior analgesia, the signicant adverse effects ofpruritus, nausea and vomiting, reactivation of herpes simplex,urinary retention, sedation and delayed respiratory depression,which have a higher incidence with intrathecal morphinecompared with parenteral opioids, may contribute to lower patientsatisfaction scores.9e11 Dahl et al. estimated that if a 0.1 mg dose isused, 43% of the patients will have pruritus, 12% will suffer fromvomiting and 10% from nausea; all of whom would not haveexperienced these side effects without treatment. Pruritus is oftencited as the most frequent and unpleasant adverse event. Onerandomized prospective study16 showed signicantly higher in-cidences of pruritus and nausea in doses of 0.25 mg of morphinecompared to 0.1 mg.

    Respiratory depression is a rare but serious complication ofwhich the incidence in the post-caesarean population is likely to below.9 Morphine is highly ionized and does not penetrate into lipid-rich tissues and has an extended duration in the cerebrospinal uid.Morphine spreads cephalad in the spinal space from bulk owreaching the trigeminal nerve distribution in about 6e9 h afterintrathecal injection in volunteers.17 Abouleish et al. performed aprospective study investigating the analgesic and side effect proleof 0.2 mg in 856 parturients and found respiratory depression(dened by a SpO2

  • sia a15 min. Although epidural pethidine resulted in higher pain scoreswhen compared to intrathecal morphine 100 mcg, there is areduction in pruritus and nausea requiring treatment.28 Epiduralpethidine is a more favourable mode of delivery compared to IVpethidine with lower pain scores and less sedation.29

    4. Systemic analgesia

    4.1. Intravenous and intramuscular analgesia

    Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is a popularmethod of providing post-caesarean pain relief, as it providesindividualized pain relief, greater patient autonomy, and reducesthe anaesthetist and nursing workload. In general, opioid analge-sics administered via patient-controlled IV route confer lessoptimal pain relief compared to neuraxial analgesia.29e33 Morphineis the standard drug of choice. However, compared to epiduralmorphine, IV PCA morphine is associated with higher patientsatisfaction and less opioid side effects such as pruritus and delayedrespiratory depression.30,31,33 Thus IV PCA morphine may be anexcellent alternative in post-caesarean delivery patients whocannot receive neuraxial analgesia.

    Fentanyl is another commonly used opioid in postsurgical PCA.A comparison of equivalent doses of morphine, fentanyl andpethidine in postsurgical PCA found no difference in patient satis-faction and the incidence of side effects except more pruritus wasexperienced in the morphine group.34 Limitations of fentanyl PCAappear to be its relatively higher cost, more programming in-terventions and lack of clinical benet over morphine.35 Pethidinehas been used in the setting of post-caesarean analgesia, andalthough studies show that they may provide equivalent pain reliefand a comparable if not better maternal side-effect prolecompared to morphine or fentanyl,32,34,36 concerns about neonatalexposure in breast-feedingmothers may limit its use. Pethidine andits active metabolite are known to accumulate in breast milk andbreast-fed infants. This is likely due to impaired neonatal meta-bolism,36,37 and PCA pethidine in nursing mothers was associatedwith signicantly poorer neonatal alertness and orientation thanmorphine.36,38 Morphine-alfentanil combination PCA has beenshown to result in faster onset of analgesia,39 but the optimalregimen needs to be further dened and there are no data on breastmilk transfer. A recent retrospective caseecontrol study found thata single dose of IV methadone given intra-operatively and post-delivery may reduce post-operative opioid consumption whilstachieving effective analgesia.40

    Recently low dose IV ketamine given during spinal anaesthesia(pre-emptively) has been proposed to prolong post-caesareananalgesia and reduce opioid consumption. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, exerts its analgesic effect mainlythrough central desensitization and reducing opioid tolerance.41,42

    A 2006 Cochrane review found that ketamine in sub-anaestheticdose is effective in reducing morphine requirements in the rst24 h after surgery. Evidence amongst caesarean delivery patients ismixed, primarily due to a difference in the method of anaesthesiaand concomitant modalities used. Evidence supporting the use oflow dose ketamine appears to come from studies where spinalanaesthesia was administered without the addition of long actingintrathecal opioids42,43; in comparison, when intrathecal morphinewas co-administered during spinal anaesthesia,44 or when PCAfentanyl was used post-operatively,45 low dose ketamine does notappear to have any opioid-sparing effect, nor is it associated withlower pain scores.

    Intramuscular (IM) opioids are easy to administer but are foundto result in less optimal pain relief and lower patient satisfaction

    S. Kwok et al. / Trends in Anaesthethan either the epidural or intravenous PCA route.30,31 A single IMdose of tramadol and diclofenac combination has been demon-strated to produce better analgesia than monotherapy or placeboand requires less morphine analgesic rescue.46

    4.2. Oral analgesia

    Oral opioids are used for post-operative analgesia as step-downtherapy from intravenous opioids or when newer and moreexpensive analgesic delivery regimens such as PCA are not readilyavailable.47,48 Earlier studies show that oral morphine providessatisfactory pain relief, is easy to administer and is substantially lessexpensive.47 More recent randomized trials showed oraloxycodone-paracetamol provides better pain relief and is associ-ated with less opioid side effects such as nausea, sedation andpruritus compared to IV PCA morphine.49 Compared to intrathecalmorphine, multimodal analgesia regimen based on oral oxycodoneproduces comparable post-operative pain relief with a lower inci-dence of pruritus, but was associated with lower satisfaction andmore requirements for additional analgesics.50

    Tramadol is another effective analgesic in post-operative pain51

    with a well-known side effect prole. It can be administeredthrough oral, IV, or IM routes, and produces less constipation andemesis than equianalgesic doses of opioids.52 Compared to oralnaproxen, oral tramadol on either a xed interval or on requestregimen affords comparable pain relief after caesarean delivery andsimilar breastfeeding scores, but is associated with a higher inci-dence of maternal adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation) andrequest for additional analgesics.53 IV tramadol administered incombination with a diclofenac suppository has been shown toproduce better analgesia than an IV diclofenaceparacetamol com-bination, with few and comparable side effects except a higherincidence of nausea amongst the tramadol group.54 Both oxyco-done and tramadol can be an acceptable alternative in the setting ofmultimodal analgesia particularly in patients who do not toleratethe adverse effects of opioid analgesia.

    Paracetamol is thought to produce analgesia both as a selectiveCOX-2 inhibitor as well as through central mechanisms, althoughthe exact mechanism of action is still unclear. Unlike opioids andNSAIDs, it produces very few side effects at therapeutic doses,making it a popular analgesic choice for post-operative mild tomoderate pain, frequently as part of a multimodal analgesiaregimen. A Cochrane review of 51 randomized placebo-controlledstudies shows that a single dose of paracetamol provides effectiveanalgesia for about half of the patients with acute post-operativepain, for a period of about 4 h, and is associated with few, mainlymild, adverse events.55 Recently, availability of the parenteralformulation of paracetamol provides an attractive option to treatimmediate post-surgical pain due to its faster onset and higherbioavailability. A review of 36 randomized studies comparedeither IV paracetamol or IV prodrug propacetamol with placeboand active controls. A single dose of both IV propacetamol and IVparacetamol was found to provide around 4 h of effective anal-gesia for about 37% of patients with acute post-operative pain,with few adverse events.56 When administered with PCAmorphine after major surgery, paracetamol given IV or orally isfound to have a signicant morphine-sparing effect thoughwithout signicant reduction in morphine related side-effects.57

    However, the evidence is less straightforward in the setting ofpost-caesarean analgesia, where a paracetamol/diclofenac combi-nation is favoured over monotherapy with either drug, and theopioid-sparing effect of paracetamol over placebo is controver-sial.58,59 More recently, IV paracetamol has been found to reducepost-operative nausea and vomiting in patients receiving generalanaesthesia, independent from the effect of reduced opioid

    nd Critical Care 4 (2014) 189e194 191consumption.60

  • ia aNon-steroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective inreducing visceral pain after caesarean section and have a well-known opioid-sparing effect associated with reduced opioid-related side effects when used in multimodal analgesia.48 Due tonon-selective inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2, NSAIDs may beassociated with undesirable side effects such as platelet, gastroin-testinal, and renal dysfunction. Of the NSAIDs family, ibuprofen andketorolac are perhaps ideal agents, with low relative infant doses(
  • sia a7. Conclusion

    Patients undergoing caesarean delivery require effective post-operative analgesia to allow early mobilisation to enhance themother's care of her newborn and facilitate breastfeeding. It needsto be safe, easy to administer and have limited transfer into breastmilk. There should be a multimodal approach with a combinationof techniques which limit adverse effects but provide high qualityanalgesia. This can be accomplishedwith neuraxial analgesiawhichhas been shown to provide superior analgesia to parenteral opioidsbut with a high incidence of side effects. In the absence of a neu-raxial technique, peripheral blocks such as the TAP block will alsoprovide effective analgesia when co-administered with systemicanalgesics.

    Conict of interest

    There is no conict of interest of note.

    References

    1. Lavand'homme P. Postcesarean analgesia: effective strategies and associationwith chronic pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19(3):244e8.

    2. Maves TJ, Gebhart GF. Antinociceptive synergy between intrathecal morphineand lidocaine during visceral and somatic nociception in the rat. Anesthesiology1992;76(1):91e9.

    3. Cardoso MM, Carvalho JC, Amaro AR, Prado AA, Cappelli EL. Small doses ofintrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperativepain control after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 1998;86(3):538e41.

    4. Pavy TJ, Paech MJ, Evans SF. The effect of intravenous ketorolac on opioidrequirement and pain after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2001;92(4):1010e4.

    5. Pavy TJ, Gambling DR, Merrick PM, Douglas MJ. Rectal indomethacin potenti-ates spinal morphine analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care1995;23(5):555e9.

    6. Huang YC, Tsai SK, Huang CH, Wang MH, Lin PL, Chen LK, et al. Intravenoustenoxicam reduces uterine cramps after Cesarean delivery. Can J Anaesth2002;49(4):384e7.

    7. OAA. http://www.oaa-anaes.ac.uk/assets/_managed/editor/File/NOAD/NOAD%202011%20nal.pdf (accessed 5 May 2014).

    8. Rosaeg OP, Lui AC, Cicutti NJ, Bragg PR, Crossan ML, Krepski B. Peri-operativemultimodal pain therapy for caesarean section: analgesia and tness fordischarge. Can J Anaesth 1997;44(8):803e9.

    9. Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jrgensen H, Wetterslev J, Miniche S. Intraoperative andpostoperative analgesic efcacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids inpatients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative andquantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology1999;91(6):1919e27.

    10. Gwirtz KH, Young JV, Byers RS, Alley C, Levin K, Walker SG, et al. The safety andefcacy of intrathecal opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain: sevenyears' experience with 5969 surgical patients at Indiana University Hospital.Anesth Analg 1999;88(3):599e604.

    11. Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan Jr JA, Wu CL. Efcacy ofpostoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2003;290(18):2455e63.

    12. Cousins MJ, Mather LE. Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids.Anesthesiology 1984;61(3):276e310.

    13. Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationshipof intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999;90(2):437e44. Erratum in: Anesthesiology 1999;90(4):1241.

    14. Chadwick HS, Ready LB. Intrathecal and epidural morphine sulfate for post-cesarean analgesia: a clinical comparison. Anesthesiology 1988;68(6):925e9.

    15. Swart M, Sewell J, Thomas D. Intrathecal morphine for caesarean section: anassessment of pain relief, satisfaction and side-effects. Anaesthesia 1997;52(4):373e7.

    16. Yang T, Breen TW, Archer D, Fick G. Comparison of 0.25 mg and 0.1 mgintrathecal morphine for analgesia after Cesarean section. Can J Anesth1999;46(9):856e60.

    17. Bromage PR, Camporesi EM, Durant PA, Nielsen CH. Rostral spread of epiduralmorphine. Anesthesiology 1982;56(6):431e6.

    18. Abouleish E, Rawal N, Rashad MN. The addition of 0.2 mg subarachnoidmorphine to hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery: a prospective studyof 856 cases. Reg Anesth 1991;16(3):137e40.

    19. Sarvela J, Halonen P, Soikkeli A, Korttila K. A double-blinded, randomizedcomparison of intrathecal and epidural morphine for elective cesarean de-livery. Anesth Analg 2002;95(2):436e40.

    S. Kwok et al. / Trends in Anaesthe20. Palmer CM, Nogami WM, Van Maren G, Alves DM. Postcesarean epiduralmorphine: a dose-response study. Anesth Analg 2000;90(4):887e91.21. Carvalho B, Riley E, Cohen SE, Gambling D, Palmer C, Huffnagle HJ, et al.,DepoSur Study Group. Single-dose, sustained-release epidural morphine in themanagement of postoperative pain after elective cesarean delivery: results of amulticenter randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg 2005;100(4):1150e8.

    22. Carvalho B, Roland LM, Chu LF, Campitelli 3rd VA, Riley ET. Single-dose,extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) compared to conventionalepidural morphine for post-cesarean pain. Anesth Analg 2007;105(1):176e83.

    23. Bloor GK, Sinden M, McGregor R. An audit of single dose epidural diamorphineduring elective caesarean section at a district general hospital. Int J ObstetAnesth 1999;8(1):11e6.

    24. Bloor GK, Thompson M, Chung N. A randomised, double-blind comparison ofsubarachnoid and epidural diamorphine for elective caesarean section using acombined spinal-epidural technique. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000;9(4):233e7.

    25. Hallworth SP, Fernando R, Bell R, Parry MG, Lim GH. Comparison of intrathecaland epidural diamorphine for elective caesarean section using a combinedspinal-epidural technique. Br J Anaesth 1999;82(2):228e32.

    26. Cohen S, Pantuck CB, Amar D, Burley E, Pantuck EJ. The primary action ofepidural fentanyl after cesarean delivery is via a spinal mechanism. AnesthAnalg 2002;94(3):674e9.

    27. Cooper DW, Saleh U, Taylor M, Whyte S, Ryall D, Kokri MS, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia: epdiural fentanyl and i.v. morphine compared aftercaesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1999;82(3):366e70.

    28. Paech MJ, Pavy TJ, Orlikowski CE, Kuh J, Yeo ST, Lim K, et al. Postoperativeintraspinal opioid analgesia after caesarean section; a randomised comparisonof subarachnoid morphine and epidural pethidine. Int J Obstet Anesth2000;9(4):238e45.

    29. Paech MJ, Moore JS, Evans SF. Meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia aftercesarean section. Intravenous versus epidural administration. Anesthesiology1994;80(6):1268e76.

    30. Eisenach JC, Grice SC, Dewan DM. Patient-controlled analgesia following ce-sarean section: a comparison with epidural and intramuscular narcotics.Anesthesiology 1988;68(3):444e8.

    31. Harrison DM, Sinatra R, Morgese L, Chung JH. Epidural narcotic and patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean section pain relief. Anesthesiology1988;68(3):454e7.

    32. Ngan Kee WD, Lam KK, Chen PP, Gin T. Comparison of patient-controlledepidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethi-dine or fentanyl. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997;25(2):126e32.

    33. Rapp-Zingraff N, Bayoumeu F, Baka N, Hamon I, Virion JM, Laxenaire MC.Analgesia after caesarean section: patient-controlled intravenous morphine vsepidural morphine. Int J Obstet Anesth 1997;6(2):87e92.

    34. Woodhouse A, Hobbes AF, Mather LE, Gibson M. A comparison of morphine,pethidine and fentanyl in the postsurgical patient-controlled analgesia envi-ronment. Pain 1996;64(1):115e21.

    35. Howell PR, Gambling DR, Pavy T, McMorland G, Douglas MJ. Patient-controlledanalgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a comparisonof fentanyl with morphine. Can J Anaesth 1995;42(1):41e5.

    36. Wittels B, Scott DT, Sinatra RS. Exogenous opioids in human breast milk andacute neonatal neurobehavior: a preliminary study. Anesthesiology 1990;73(5):864e9.

    37. Al-Tamimi Y, Ilett KF, Paech MJ, O'Halloran SJ, Hartmann PE. Estimation ofinfant dose and exposure to pethidine and norpethidine via breast milkfollowing patient-controlled epidural pethidine for analgesia post caesareandelivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011;20(2):128e34.

    38. Wittels B, Glosten B, Faure EA, Moawad AH, Ismail M, Hibbard J, et al. Post-cesarean analgesia with both epidural morphine and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: neurobehavioral outcomes among nursing neonates.Anesth Analg 1997;85(3):600e6.

    39. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Wong EL. Randomised double-blind comparison ofmorphine vs. a morphine-alfentanil combination for patient-controlled anal-gesia. Anaesthesia 1999 Jul;54(7):629e33.

    40. Russell T, Mitchell C, Paech MJ, Pavy T. Efcacy and safety of intraoperativeintravenous methadone during general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: aretrospective case-control study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013;22(1):47e51.

    41. Bell RF, Dahl JB, Moore RA, Kalso E. Perioperative ketamine for acute post-operative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:CD004603.

    42. Menkiti ID, Desalu I, Kushimo OT. Low-dose intravenous ketamine improvespostoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery with spinal bupivacaine inAfrican parturients. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012;21(3):217e21.

    43. Behdad S, Hajiesmaeili MR, Abbasi HR, Ayatollahi V, Khadiv Z, Sedaghat A.Analgesic effects of intravenous ketamine during spinal anesthesia in pregnantwomen undergone caesarean section; a randomized clinical trial. Anesth PainMed 2013;3(2):230e3.

    44. Bauchat JR, Higgins N, Wojciechowski KG, McCarthy RJ, Toledo P, Wong CA.Low-dose ketamine with multimodal postcesarean delivery analgesia: a ran-domized controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011;20(1):3e9.

    45. Han SY, Jin HC, Yang WD, Lee JH, Cho SH, Chae WS, et al. The effect of low-doseketamine on post-caesarean delivery analgesia after spinal anesthesia. Korean JPain 2013;26(3):270e6.

    46. Wilder-Smith CH, Hill L, Dyer RA, Torr G, Coetzee E. Postoperative sensitizationand pain after cesarean delivery and the effects of single im doses of tramadoland diclofenac alone and in combination. Anesth Analg 2003;97(2):526e33.

    47. Jakobi P, Weiner Z, Solt I, Alpert I, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Zimmer EZ. Oral analgesia

    nd Critical Care 4 (2014) 189e194 193in the treatment of post-cesarean pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2000;93(1):61e4.

  • 48. McDonnell NJ, Keating ML, Muchatuta NA, Pavy TJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia aftercaesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37(4):539e51.

    49. Davis KM, Esposito MA, Meyer BA. Oral analgesia compared with intravenouspatient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: a randomizedcontrolled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194(4):967e71.

    50. McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Browning RM, Nathan EA. A randomised comparisonof regular oral oxycodone and intrathecal morphine for post-caesarean anal-gesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010;19(1):16e23.

    51. Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single-patient data meta-analysis of 3453 postoperativepatients: oral tramadol versus placebo, codeine and combination analgesics.Pain 1997;69(3):287e94.

    52. Bloor M, Paech MJ, Kaye R. Tramadol in pregnancy and lactation. Int J ObstetAnesth 2012;21(2):163e7.

    53. Sammour RN, Ohel G, Cohen M, Gonen R. Oral naproxen versus oral tramadolfor analgesia after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;113(2):144e7.

    54. Mitra S, Khandelwal P, Sehgal A. Diclofenac-tramadol vs. diclofenac-acetaminophen combinations for pain relief after caesarean section. ActaAnaesthesiol Scand 2012;56(6):706e11.

    55. Toms L, McQuay HJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Single dose oral paracetamol (acet-aminophen) for postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2008;4:CD004602.

    56. Tzortzopoulou A, McNicol ED, Cepeda MS, Francia MB, Farhat T, Schumann R.Single dose intravenous propacetamol or intravenous paracetamol for post-operative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;10:CD007126.

    57. Remy C, Marret E, Bonnet F. Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effectsand consumption after major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlledtrials. Br J Anaesth 2005;94(4):505e13.

    58. Siddik SM, Aouad MT, Jalbout MI, Rizk LB, Kamar GH, Baraka AS. Diclofenacand/or propacetamol for postoperative pain management after cesarean de-livery in patients receiving patient controlled analgesia morphine. Reg AnesthPain Med 2001;26(4):310e5.

    59. Munishankar B, Fettes P, Moore C, McLeod GA. A double-blind randomisedcontrolled trial of paracetamol, diclofenac or the combination for pain reliefafter caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17(1):9e14.

    60. Apfel CC, Turan A, Souza K, Pergolizzi J, Hornuss C. Intravenous acetaminophenreduces postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2013;154(5):677e89.

    61. Anadon Arturo, Martnez-Larra~naga Maria Rosa, Ramos Eva, Castellano V.Chapter 6 e Transfer of drugs and xenobiotics through milk. Reproductive anddevelopmental toxicology. 2011. p. 57e71.

    62. Lowder JL, Shackelford DP, Holbert D, Beste TM. A randomized, controlled trialto compare ketorolac tromethamine versus placebo after cesarean section toreduce pain and narcotic usage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189(6):1559e62.discussion 62.

    63. Ong CK, Seymour RA, Lirk P, Merry AF. Combining paracetamol (acetamino-phen) with nonsteroidal antiinammatory drugs: a qualitative systematic re-view of analgesic efcacy for acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg2010;110(4):1170e9.

    64. Jakobi P, Solt I, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Over-the-counter oral analgesia forpostcesarean pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(4):1066e9.

    65. Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Margarido CB. Transversus abdominis plane blockfor postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinalanaesthesia. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2012;109(5):679e87.

    66. Mishriky BM, George RB, Habib AS. Transversus abdominis plane block foranalgesia after Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can JAnesth 2012;59(8):766e78.

    67. Tan TT, Teoh WH, Woo DC, Ocampo CE, Shah MK, Sia AT. A randomised trial ofthe analgesic efcacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blockafter caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol2012;29(2):88e94.

    68. O'Neill P, Duarte F, Ribeiro I, Centeno MJ, Moreira J. Ropivacaine continuouswound infusion versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia aftercesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2012;114(1):179e85.

    69. Lavand'homme PM, Roelants F, Waterloos H, De Kock MF. Postoperativeanalgesic effects of continuous wound inltration with diclofenac after electivecesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2007;106(6):1220e5.

    70. Lavand'homme PM, Roelants F, Mercier V, Waterloos H. Continuous woundinstillation after cesarean section: local analgesic effect of diclofenac. Anes-thesiology 2004;100(Supp. 1):A22.

    71. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Transfer of drugs andother chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 2001;108(3):776e89.

    72. Berlin CM, Briggs GG. Drugs and chemicals in human milk. Semin Fetal NeonatalMed 2005;10(2):149e59.

    73. Ito S. Drug therapy for breast-feeding women. N Engl J Med 2000;343(2):118e26. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2000;343(18):1348.

    S. Kwok et al. / Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 4 (2014) 189e194194

    Post-caesarean analgesia1. Introduction2. Multimodal analgesia3. Neuraxial analgesia3.1. Intrathecal opioids3.2. Epidural morphine3.3. Epidural diamorphine3.4. Epidural fentanyl3.5. Epidural pethidine

    4. Systemic analgesia4.1. Intravenous and intramuscular analgesia4.2. Oral analgesia

    5. Wound infiltration and peripheral nerve blocks5.1. TAP block5.2. Wound infiltration

    6. Analgesia and breast feeding7. ConclusionConflict of interestReferences