political geographies, geographical politics
TRANSCRIPT
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
The geography of the U.S. democratic system—this geography profoundly shapes political “voice”, election outcomes, etc.
1) In the US system, citizens are represented on a geographical basis (as opposed to social group, for example).
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
The geography of the U.S. democratic system—this geography profoundly shapes political “voice”, election outcomes, etc.
2) There is a peculiar geography to the way the president is elected
+ there is no popular “national” election for the president
+ instead there is a two-step process involving 50 individual state-level
elections in November leading to a national election in December.
+ this is what is referred to as the “electoral college” system+ this is what is referred to as the “electoral college” system
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
+ delegates (members of the electoral college) elect the president
+ delegates are selected by parties (each party selects the same number of
delegates; # of delegates for each state is based on state’s population)
The geography of the U.S. democratic system—this geography profoundly shapes political “voice”, election outcomes, etc.
2) There is a peculiar geography to the way the president is elected
+ when you vote for president you are actually choosing a slate of
+ remember: the state is the territorial unit at which it operates, i.e. states
elect presidents, not people directly
+ whichever party slate wins popular vote becomes the state’s electors
+ winner-take-all system (in all but several states)
Example: In Georgia, Bush received 58% popular vote but got all of the
electoral votes (15).
+ when you vote for president you are actually choosing a slate of
delegates or electors that will represent your state
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
County-level map of popular vote
for president, 2004
Red = solid Bush (> 75%)
Blue = solid Kerry (> 75%)
2004 Presidential Election
Purple = split (50%/50%)
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
Map of electoral votes for
president, 2004
Red = Bush
Blue = Kerry
2004 Presidential Election
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
County-level map of popular vote
for president, 2004
Red = solid Bush (> 75%)
Blue = solid Gore (> 75%)
2000 Presidential Election
Purple = split (50%/50%)
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
Map of electoral votes for
president, 2004
Red = Bush
Blue = Gore
2000 Presidential Election
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
+ thus, president is not chosen by popular vote
Example: Bush versus Gore in 2000
Electoral votes needed to win: 270
Bush won the election with 271 electoral votes even though Gore received more popular votes (51 mil to 50.4 mil)to 50.4 mil)
+ this affects spatial strategies of presidential campaigns
Why have this system?
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
II. Geographical politics
A. The US democratic system
--reapportionment, redistricting, and gerrymandering
+ reapportionment � allocating electoral seats to geog areas
+ redistricting �
+ gerrymandering �
(re)defining territorial district boundaries
* Both endeavors to maintain keep population and representation matched for
the territorial unit
redistricting for partisan purposes
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
gerrymandering � redistricting for partisan purposes
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
gerrymandering � redistricting for partisan purposes
Redrawing the balanced electoral districts in this example creates a
guaranteed 3-to-1 advantage in representation for the blue voters.
Here, 14 red voters are packed into the light green district and the
remaining 18 are cracked across the 3 blue districts.
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
gerrymandering � redistricting for partisan purposes
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
gerrymandering � redistricting for partisan purposes
Political Geographies, Geographical Politics
gerrymandering � redistricting for partisan purposes