policy advoccay and engagement training narrative report - cotonou, benin - (december 2010)

Upload: wacsi

Post on 06-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    1/16

    Workshop Report

    POLICY ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACYTRAINING WORKSHOP FOR CIVILSOCIETY

    ACTORS IN BENIN

    DATE D b

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    2/16

    DATE D b

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    List of acronyms ......................................................................................................................................3

    1.0 Introduction ..4

    1.1 Objectives...............................................4

    1.2 Methodology ..........................................................4

    1.3 Training Content......................................5

    2.0 Opening Session.5

    2.1 Workshop Activities5

    2.2 Conclusion and Recommendation.12

    Annex 1: ProgrammeAgenda15

    Annex 2: List of Participants..16

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    3/16

    LIST OF ACCRONYMS

    APF Advocacy Planning Framework

    CBOs Community Based Organizations

    CSOs Civil Society Organizations

    LGI Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative

    NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations

    OSI Open Society Institute

    PA Policy Advocacy

    OSIWA Open Society Initiative for West Africa

    TOT Training of Trainers

    WACSI West Africa Civil Society Institute

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    4/16

    1.0 Introduction

    The West African Civil Society Institute in partnership with the Open Society Initiative for WestAfrica (OSIWA) organized a four days training workshop (13-16 December, 2010) on policy

    Engagement and Advocacy in Benin Republic for the first time. The workshop attracted eighteen

    participants, 1 observer, 8 females and 10 males from civil society organizations across Benin.

    The overall objective was to enhance the ability and capacity of Benin civil society actors to engage

    in constructive policy discourses, interact with policy makers and influence policy formulation

    processes. The workshop also aimed at increasing the grantees practical skills and techniques in

    policy analysis, influencing and formulation, as well as in writing effective policy briefs and conduct

    policy research and studies, strengthen the capacities of to develop effective strategies and

    communication tools for Policy Advocacy.

    1.1 Objectives of the workshop

    The objectives of the workshop were to:

    To enhance CSOs ability to write and use evidence based and targeted policy papers;

    To enhance CSOs knowledge of public policy networks and processes; To enhance CSOs ability to write and use evidence-based and targeted policy papers; To build insight into the process of planning an effective policy advocacy campaign; To increase CSOs understanding of the policy environment in West Africa (specifically in Benin)

    and potential entry points; and

    To provide the platform for civil society actors across the region (specifically in Benin) to formadvocacy networks and build alliances.

    1.2 The workshop Methodology

    The workshop was delivered by using:

    A learn-centered/ interactive method;

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    5/16

    2.0 Opening Session

    The workshop commenced with a welcome message by the Policy Advocacy officer of WACSI, Ms.

    Omolara Balogun, who appreciated the participants for making out time to attend the workshopMs. Omolara began with a brief presentation on WACS by saying that WACSI was established by

    the Open Society Initiatives for West Africa (OSIWA) in 2005 but it became fully operational in May

    2007 with the major aim to reinforce the capacities of civil society in the region and to bridge the

    institutional and operational gaps within civil society.

    The establishment ofWACSI was preceded by a comprehensive regional need assessment

    conducted in 2007.She concluded by saying that after the four days training, she hopes to have more information about

    WACSI to add on this short presentation and introduced the two trainers to the participants.

    Trainers Opening Remarks

    The trainers began by introducing themselves and giving brief information about themselves in

    their involvement in this particular project.The trainers also said the four days training will not be

    a lecture course but the opportunity to learn from the experiences of the participants, to create a

    practical platform for both trainers and participants to explore, discuss and share knowledge, good

    practices and strategies to construct effective policy advocacy framework and enhance individual

    knowledge in policy advocacy, engagement, formulation and analysis.

    2.1 Workshop Activities

    Day one: The first activity of the workshop began by giving an opportunity to the participants to

    introduce themselves before giving a drawing exercise where they were asked to draw objects

    about themselves. Participants were tasked to interact between and among them to identify the

    meaning of each object of them has drawn individually.

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    6/16

    Participants were divided into groups of four, to define their expectations and concerns for the

    workshop as well as their individual objectives. This exercise highlighted participants priorities in

    understanding policy issues and how to engage, influence and strategize round those issues withinBenin political and policy context. Conducting effective policy advocacy and best strategy in

    engaging policy makers were three leading issues identified by the participants during the

    expectation and concern session. Specifically, participants highlighted the following concerns

    and expectations. as captured in the table below:

    Table 1: Expectations and Concerns of participants

    Groups name Expectations

    Oranges To know the different form of advocacy and control the tools of developing aAPF.

    To learn how to structure and develop a good advocacy argument. To learn the difference between lobbying and advocacy.

    Bleu To know the strategies and the tools for policy advocacy elaboration.

    Exchange and acquire the strategies of building alliances. To learn how to help community leaders to better influence the process of

    developing public policy

    Verts To understand the process of advocacy. To enhance our kills in writing effective public papers. Identify the method and the process for a meaningful analysis of the context

    Roses To identify the challenges of public policy advocacy. Learn how to structure and implement advocacy campaign within the Benin

    framework.

    To learn how to write advocacy message

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    7/16

    Methodology Will be practical and learning centered Learning by doing approach Participants experiences in policy advocacy/processes Paring, group works and plenary discussions Trainees were asked to share personal experiences and their level of

    awareness regarding the training themes

    In the next activity, the participants were asked to highlight the characteristics of an effective

    advocacy paper. The exercise was to determine the participants level of understanding in advocacy.

    Having being divided into four groups, participants came out with a number of characteristics of an

    effective advocacy paper:

    Table 3

    CHARACTERISTICS OF AN EFFECTIVE ADVOCAVY PAPER

    Groups name

    Oranges 1. Present a problem within its context2. It should have a target audience.3. Clear presentation of the issue to be addressed4. Objectives of the advocacy (SMART)5. It should be brief, concise, coherent comprehensible and convincing

    Bleu 1. Present an argument that urgent problem exists.2. An objectives and results3. Specifies a target4. Strategies to adopt and mechanisms for implementation5. Recommendations and resources.

    Verts 1 Problem statement

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    8/16

    purposive course of action, actors population, combination of basic decisions, commitments and actions, political decisions to achieve societal goals, set of interrelated decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors, series of governmental activities designed to remedy some public problem and subject to change on the basic of newThe last activity for the first day of the training was as a challenge for the participants to prove their

    communication and networking skills through the use of the network threads and role play; and tooutline in groups the purpose of a policy paper.

    Day two

    The second day began with a recap of previous days activities and lesson Policy option. Facilitators

    distributed pieces of papers to the participants and asked themto write words on each piece that

    they remember from the previous days lesson.

    In groups the participants acted out and described without mentioning the words to the group foridentification. Some of those words were: Convincing, coherent, Policy dialogue, Recommendations,

    Engagement, Target-audience, Comprehensible, Actors etc.

    The second day commenced with the activity to identify essential element of a policy brief and

    policy study. Following a heated debate on the issues the participants with the assistance of the

    trainers were able to make a clarification between the two documents.

    Table 4:Structural Elements of Policy Study/Brief

    Policy Study Policy Brief

    1 Title 1 Title

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    9/16

    Table 5:Writing a Policy Paper: Contents of the Elements

    Elements ContentsIntroduction Purposes:

    Present the context and nature of the PA. Provide the basic research has led. Understand the approach of the author and the main solutions raised

    in the argument.

    Give a clear idea of the direction, orientation and different ideas in thedocument body

    Content:

    Context of (Policy Advocacy Statement of Intent methodology and limitation of the study Road map document

    Others Advices:

    clear, precise, concise show the approach and methodology to be followed

    Problem

    Description

    Purpose:

    Identify, define and explain the problem to examine Convince the reader that the central issue requires action

    Content:

    Causing the problem (historical-present) Great lines and environment problem offer an opportunity for discussion of options Show the existence of the problem (development of the problem)

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    10/16

    Other Advices:

    Focusing on the argument Mentioned weaknesses of the chosen option Highlight the decisions taken Establishing a coherent link between conclusion and

    recommendations/Evaluation alternatives

    Conclusion/Reco

    mmendation

    Purpose:

    Fulfill the role policy paper as a decision making tool, leaves aresponsible and lasting impression.

    Content Synthesis of major finding; Set of policy recommendations and; Concluding remarks- warning and other measures.

    Other Advices

    Highlight potential constraints related to the action of decision maker.

    The analysis was followed by an interactive discussion on what an ideal policy cycle should be.

    Participants discussed how to plan and effectively engage a policy cycle from the beginning to

    achieve the set policy goals or policy objectives. The scope of the policy cycle was broadened by the

    trainers.. The activity was used summarize the relevance of a policy cycle:

    identifying the past, present and possible future What are the past and present problems What are the possible causes of the problems Who are those (people) affected by the problem

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    11/16

    points. In the end, a consensus was reached and a clear distinction was made in relation to what

    constitute a policy paper and an academic paper. For instance, an academic paper was said to be

    technical and targeted at addressing or exposing and or exploring a societal problem with a clearcut Problem of the Statement while the policy brief is writing in a simple text to of about a

    maximum of 10 pages with the purpose to serve as a call to action for the targeted group of people

    usually politician and or ordinary people.

    This was followed by an in-depth analysis of the sample a policy study and policy brief.

    Participants-were re-grouped into four, each group was presented with a sample of a policy brief

    and a policy study and tasked to analyze the papers. The titles of the sample papers were:

    Policy Study- Nakrosis, Vitalis (2008) reforming performance management in Lithuania: towards

    results-based government.

    Policy Brief- West African Network for Peace building/WANEP (2010), tackling the crisis in Cote

    DIvoire prioritizing the priorities.

    Day Four

    On the last day of the training, activities commenced with an overview on the lessons and issuestreated in the last three days. The trainers reiterated the relevance of the training specifically as it

    provides practical opportunity for participants to be exposed to the real technical components and

    details regarding the development of an advocacy documents that will be useful to conduct effective

    advocacy campaign or implement an advocacy strategy.

    In the last activity training, participants learnt how to develop an advocacy plan using the Advocacy

    Planning Framework (APF).

    See in the table below the for the outcome of the different groups in designing an Advocacy

    Planning Framework (APF)

    Table 6:

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    12/16

    Format/Packaging:

    It could be either a Study ora brief depending on theaudience profile.

    Mode of Delivery:

    Press releases- media Open forum.Thinking of responses:

    Action points Counter to such responses

    prepared

    Way forward2.2 Conclusion and RecommendationFeedback of the participant

    Part One: The workshop in one WORD

    The session (recommendation session) was facilitated by WACSI represented by the policy

    Advocacy officer. The objective of the session is to obtain immediate feedback from participants

    highlighting the relevance of the training to their respective organizational mandates and individual

    development; how they intend to use the skills, knowledge and capacity acquired in the course of

    the training, as well as give insightful recommendations that will enhance future delivery and

    packaging of the training. The session also required participants to comment briefly on the areasthat met their expectations and point out others which require improvement.

    The first point of call was for the entire 4-days experience to be qualified in one word by each

    participant Some of the words/responses gathered in this session include:

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    13/16

    Part Two: Immediate Impact

    The second part required participants to state briefly what, how, and when, they would be drawing

    from the newly acquired skills. The objective of this section part is to have a quick understanding ofwhich of the training component (contents/session) is most relevant to the group and how soon

    they will put it into practical usage. Some of the responses are captured below:

    To technically restitute some the way of approaching advocacy issues To conduct a step training to fellow colleague on the immediate employment of APF and its

    Implementation

    To review the current planning of all advocacy intervention especially on ongoing projectand possibly in past and future engagements

    Embark on technical correction of existing documents of about 4 organisations includingpolicy briefs and where possible policy studies

    Immediate application of the different concept learnt in the course of the training (both verbally

    and practically)

    Part Three

    The third part requires participants to share with the larger group of what went/worked well

    during the four days, and what should be improved upon in organizing future training for similar

    group.

    Training materials: the following statement were capture on the sub-themes below

    Very useful reference document Comprehensive and not over burden Very good and practical A good guide and a point of reference

    *In this part, the participants requested that the entire contents of the manual are translated into

    French for better understanding.

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    14/16

    Conclusion

    The workshop was closed by the Executive Director of WACSI, Mrs. Nana Asantewa Afadzinu. In

    her speech, she expressed her satisfaction for the realization of this workshop despite somechallenges that were confronted. She thanked the partners - LGI specifically for funding the

    workshop even at the last minutes and OSIWA for its usual support since the commencement of the

    project in 2008. She appreciated the time, commitment and dedication demonstrated by the two

    trainers (Ms. Lucky and Mr. Constant) for making themselves available for facilitate the training

    despite the back and forth and the final short notice, and finally the participants for the interest and

    seriousness, commitment targeting learning effectively in the course of the 4day training. She

    implored participants to make conscious effort at putting the acquired skills into practical use intheir day-to-day activities. Ms. Nana finally close the training by stating that WACSI will ensure that

    other training of the institute is organized for Benin CSOs to further enhance their capacity in other

    areas where most CSOs are technically challenged in the course of the year.

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    15/16

    PROGRAMMME DE LATELIERPLAIDOYER ET ENGAGEMENT DE POLITIQUE COTONOU, BENIN

    DATE: 13-16 DECEMBRE, 2010LIEU: BENIN ATLANTIC BEACH HOTEL, COTONOU, BENIN

    (1ere journe)LUNDI 13 DECEMBRE, 2010

    14 - 16 DEEMBRE, 2010.

    Date HEURE ACTIVITE PERSONES RESOURCES

    13

    DECEMBRE

    8.00- 8.30

    ENREGISTREMENT DES PARTICIPANTS

    8:30-9:00 ALLOCUTION DE BIENVENUE/INTRODUCTION DES PARTICIPANTS

    (Photo de famille)

    Executive Director, WACSIP A officer WACSI

    09:00-11:00 PREMIERE SESSIONAntoinette Lucky MboutConstant Gnacadja

    11:00-11:30 PAUSE CAFE 1

    11.3013.30 DEUXIEME SESSIONAntoinette Lucky MbrouConstant Gnacadja

    13:30-14:30 PAUSE DEJEUNER

    14:30-16:30 TROIXIEME SESSIONAntoinette Lucky MbrouConstant Gnacadja

    16.3017.00 PAUSE CAF 2

  • 8/3/2019 Policy Advoccay and Engagement Training Narrative Report - Cotonou, Benin - (December 2010)

    16/16

    16

    LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS A LATELIER DE FORMATION DU BENIN

    No Nom et Prnoms Organisation/

    Institution

    Position Adresse Email Numro de

    Tlphone

    1 MAMADOU OMAR Institut Kilimandjaro Coordinateur [email protected]

    [email protected]

    +229 95 40 62 79

    +229 97 58 14 14

    2 GBEDO BOCO MARIE NOELLE RIFONGA Conseillre a lEducation [email protected] +229 97 21 69 51

    +229 90 03 57 60

    3 GHIDI SAY EDMEE SUO-ONG Directrice Excutive

    Adjointe

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    +229 95 05 90 87

    +299 97 57 43 00

    4 IDOHOU LEONTINE RIFONGA Prsidente [email protected] +229 95 06 66 08

    +229 21 04 24 71

    5 GLELE AHANHANZO MARYSE WANEP. Benin Membre [email protected] +229 97 88 59 74

    +229 21 30 99 39

    6 HANKAN PARFAIT ONG. Espace et vie Directeur Excutif [email protected] +229 97 06 94 82

    +229 95 28 72 03

    7 BAWA YAYA BIO SOS. Civisme Benin Secrtaire gnral [email protected] +229 95 44 13 90

    8 DANIEL ATAIGBA CSA. Benin 2eme Secrtaire Adjoint [email protected] +229 95 58 54 02

    9 DADJO MATHILDA SNV.Benin Conseillre Genre [email protected] +229 95 96 29 65

    10 KPESSOU C. DIEUDONNE ARGA Charge de Programme [email protected] +229 96 51 36 79

    11 GBEDJI OKE H.CLEOPHAS FONAC Membre du Conseil

    dAdministration

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    +229 21 31 20 02

    +229 97 09 73 65

    12 KPAKPO DAVID MODESTE G.CASB Coordinateur [email protected] +229 96 25 97 70

    13 AHOUANSOU PIERRE CLAVER AJE ONG Prsident [email protected] +229 95 05 90 04

    +229 96 23 25 06

    14 ADANVOESSI VINCENT EIP- Benin Coordinateur [email protected] +229 97 13 64 61

    +229 95 98 42 08

    15 DADJO FAKAME ANTOINETTE Ligue Life Prsidente [email protected] +229 90 90 67 89

    16 FATOUMATA ZOSSOU Hunger Free World Reprsentante [email protected] +229 95 45 88 6817 GUEDEGBE INNOCENTIA RIFONGA.Benin TGA [email protected] +229 97 07 63 77

    18 AKOUETE GASTON WANEP Stagiaire [email protected] +229 95 88 40 55

    19 ANTOINETTE L. MBROU CYJR Formatrice [email protected] +228 0 74 69 79

    20 CONSTANT GNACADJA WANEP Formateur [email protected]

    [email protected]

    +229 95 06 56 15

    +229 97 38 85 59

    21 OMOLARA BALOGUN WACSI Policy/officer [email protected] +233 243 746 790

    22 ASSIATOU DIALLO WACSI Stagiaire [email protected]

    [email protected]

    +233 242 661 480

    +224 64 77 36 10

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]