plant design 5 s
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
1/43
CHAPTER 5INPUT-OUTPUT STRUCTURE
OF THE FLOWSHEET
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
2/43
5.1 DECISIONS FOR THE
INPUT-OUTPUT STRUCTURE
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
3/43
ProcessFeedstreamsProduct
By-Product
ProcessFeed
streamsProduct
By-Product
Purge
Flowsheet Alternative
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
4/43
TABLE 5.1-1 Hierarchy of decisions1. Batch versus continuous2. Input-output structure of the flowsheet
3. Recycle structure of flowsheet4. General structure of the separation system
a. Vapor recovery system
b. Liquid separation system5. Heat-exchanger network
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
5/43
TABLE 5.1-2 Level-2 decisions
1. Should we purify the feed streams before they
enter the process?
2. Should we remove or recycle a reversible by-product
3. Should we use a a gas recycle and purge
stream?
4. Should we not bother to recover and recycle
some reactants?
5. How many product streams will there be?
6. What are the design variables for the input-
output structure, and what economic trade-offsare associated with these variables?
Level 2 Decisions
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
6/43
Guideline
If feed impurity is not inert and it present in significantquantities, remove it
If a feed impurity is present in a gas feed, as a first guessprocess the impurity
If a feed in the a liquid feed stream is also a by-product orproduct component, usually it is better to feed the processthrough the separation system.
If a feed impurity is present in large amounts, remove it
Purification of Feed
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
7/43
If feed impurity is present as azeotrope with a reactant,often it is better to process the impurity.
If a feed impurity is inert but is easier to separate fromthe product than the feed, it is better to process theimpurity.
If a feed impurity is a catalyst poison, remove it.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
8/43
PROCESS ALTERNATIVE
If we not certain that our decision is correct, we list theopposite decision as a process alternative.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
9/43
ECONOMIC TRADE-OFFS FOR FEEDPURIFICATION.
Our decision of purifying the feed streams before they
are processed involves an economics trade-off between
building a preprocess separation system and increase the
cost of process be cause we handling the increased flowrate of inert materials. Ofcourse, the amount of inert
materials present and where they will enter and leave the
process may have a great impact on the processing costs.
Therefore, it is not surprising that there is no simpledesign criterion that always indicates the correct decision.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
10/43
Recover or Recycle Reversible By-
products
Toluene+H2Benzene+CH4
(4.1-3)
2Benzene Diphenyl+H2
The reactions to produce benzene fromtoluene are
The second reactions is reversible, we couldrecycle diphenyl black to the reactor and let
it build up in recycle loop until it eventuallyreached an equilibrium level .
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
11/43
Gas Recycle and Purge
Whenever a light reactant and either a
light feed impurity or a light by-
product boil lower than propylene(-55
F, -48 C), use a gas recycle and
purge stream
A membrane separation process also should alwaysbe considered
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
12/43
Do Not Recover and Recycle
Some Reactant
We should recover more than 99% all valuablematerials
Since some materials, such as air and water,
normally do not bother to recover and recycleunconverted amount of these component.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
13/43
Number of ProductStreams
It is never advantageous to separate two streams and then mixthem together.
The common sense design guideline
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
14/43
TABLE 5.1-3 Destination codes and componentclassifications
Destination code Component classification1. Vent Gaseous by-products and feed
impurities2. Recycle and purge Gaseous reactants plus inert gases
and/or gaseous by products3. Recycle Reactants
Azeotropes with reactants (sometimes)
Reversible by-products (sometimes)4. None Reactant-if complete conversion or
unstable reaction intermediates
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
15/43
TABLE 5.1-3 Destination codes and componentclassifications
Destination code Component classification5. Excess-vent Gaseous reactant not recovered and
recycled6. Excess-waste Liquid reactant not recovered or
recycled7. Primary product Primary product
8. Valuable by-product (I) Separate destinationfor different by-products9. Fuel By-products to fuel10. Waste By-products to fuel waste treatment
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
16/43
Example 5.1-1 Suppose we have the 10 componentslisted in order of their boiling points and with destinationcodes indicated. How many product streams will therebe.
A Waste F Primary productB Waste G RecycleC Recycle H Recycle
D Fuel I Valuable by-product 1E Fuel J Fuel
Component Destination Component Destination
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
17/43
Solution. The product stream are
1. A+B to waste(do not separate them andthen mix them in the sewer)2. D+E to fuel (do not separate them and then
mix them to burn)3. F-primary product (to storage for sale)
4. I-valuable by product I (to storage for sale)
5. J to fuel (j must be separated from D and E
to recover components F,G,H and I, so wetreat J as a separate product stream)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
18/43
Example 5.1-2 Hydroalkylation of toluene to
produce benzene. Find the number of product
stream for the HAD process; i.e, see Example 4.1-
1.
Solution.- List all component
-arrange these components in order of
their normal boiling point
-Destination code
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
19/43
Example 5.1-4 Toluene to benzene
H2 -253 C Recycle and purge
CH4 -161 C Recycle and purgeBenzene 80 C Primary productToluene 111 C RecycleDiphenyl 253 C Fuel
Component Boiling point Destination Code
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
20/43
The initial flowsheet
ProcessH2, CH4
Benzene
Diphenyl
Purge H2, CH4
Toluene
Fig. 5.1-2 Input-output structure of HDA process.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
21/43
Evaluation of the Flowsheet
Be certain that all products, by products
and impurities leave the process
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
22/43
5.2 DESIGN VARIABLES, OVERALLMATERIAL BALANCES, AND STREAM
COST
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
23/43
TABLE 5.2-1 Possible design variables for level 2Complex reactions: Reaction conversion
molar ratio of reactant
reaction temperature and/or pressureExcess reactions: Reactants not recovered or gas
recycle and purge
Design Variables
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
24/43
TABLE 5.2-2 Procedures for developing overall materialbalances1. Start with the specified production rate.
2. From the stoichiometry (and, for complex reactions, the
correlation for product distribution) find the by-product
flows and reactant requirements (in terms of the designvariables)
3. Calculate the impurity inlet and outlet flows for the feed
streams where reactants are completely removed and
recycle
Material Balances Procedure
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
25/43
TABLE 5.2-2 Procedures for developing overall materialbalances4. Calculate the outlet flows of in terms of a specified
amount of excess (above the reaction requirements) for
streams where the reactants are not recovered and
recycled
5. Calculate the and outlet flows for the impurities enteringwith the reactant stream in step 4.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
26/43
Example 5.2-1 Toluene to benzene. Develop the
overall material balances for HDA process.
Solution. The reactions of interest are
Toluene+H2Benzene+CH4
2Benzene Diphenyl+H2 (4.1-3)
From Ex. 4.1-1 The desired production rate of
benzene is PB=265 mol/hr.
If use a gas recycle and purge stream for the H2andCH4 and remove diphenyl, then there are three
product stream
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
27/43
ProcessH2, CH4Benzene
Diphenyl
Purge H2, CH4
TolueneFig. 5.1-2 Input-output structure of HDA process.
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
28/43
SELECTIVITY AND REACTION STOICHIOMETRY
SconvertedTolueneMoles
OutletReactoratBenzeneMolesySelectivit
S
P
F B
FT
Recover and remove all this benzene. Hencefor the production PBmol/hr, the toluene fed tothe process FFTmust be
(5.2-1)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
29/43
From Eq. 4.1-3
The amount of methane produced PR,CH4 must be
S
P
P B
CHR 4
,
Toluene+H2Benzene+CH4
2Benzene Diphenyl+H2 (4.1-3)
(5.2-2)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
30/43
From Eq. 4.1-3
The amount of diphenyl produced PD must be
2
1
2
1 S
S
PSFP BFTD
Toluene+H2Benzene+CH4
2Benzene Diphenyl+H2 (4.1-3)
(5.2-3)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
31/43
RECYCLE AND PURGEIf we feed an excess amount of H
2
, FE
, into
the process,.
The total amount of H2fed to the process will
be
GFHB
E FySS
PF )1(
2(5.2-4)
yFHFG: The amount of H2in the makeup gasstream
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
32/43
The methane flow rate leaving the process
S
PFyP BGHFCH )1(4 (5.2-5)
Methane ProducedMethane entering the
process
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
33/43
The total purge flow rate PGwill then be the
excess H2, FE, plus the total methane PCH4or
S
PFyFP BGHFEG )1( (5.2-6)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
34/43
Using FEas a design variable, we nornally
use the purge composition of the reactantyPH, where
G
EPH
P
Fy (5.2-7)
0
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
35/43
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
36/43
Adding these expressions give
2
1 S
S
PFP BGG (5.2-10)
Then solve for FG
)(
1)1(1
PHFH
PHB
G yyS
S
SyP
F
(5.2-11)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
37/43
MATERIAL BALANCE IN TERMS OF EXTENT
OF REACTION. (in term of the extent of reaction)
222
2
2
2
HDiphenylBenzene
1111
42
- CHBenzeneHToluene
16)-(5.2-comsumedHydrogen
15)-(5.2comsumedToluene
14)-(5.2producedDiphenyl
13)-(5.2producedMethane
12)-(5.22-producedbenzeneNet
21
1
2
1
21
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
38/43
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
39/43
EXTENT VERSUS SELECTIVITY.
(5.2-18)
aSconvertedreactantlimitingtheofamountthe
componentdesiredofproductiontheySelectivit
bScompronentundesiredtheofproductionthe
componentdesiredofproductiontheySelectivit
1
21a
2-S
2
21b
2-S
(5.2-19)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
40/43
Example 5.2-2 Toluene to benzene. Develop the
expressions relating the extents of reaction to
production rate and selectivity for the HDA process.
(5.2-20)S
PB
1
BP
212-
S
S1
2
P)P-(
2
1 BB12
(5.2-21)
From Eq. 5.2-15 and 5.2-1 we find that
Also from Eq. 5.2-12 , we find that
(5.2-22)
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
41/43
Stream Tables.
ProcessH2, CH4 Benzene
Diphenyl
Purge H2, CH4
TolueneProduction rate =265
Design variable: FEand x
534
12
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
42/43
Compo-nent 1 2 3 4 5H2 FH2 0 0 0 FECH4 FM 0 0 0 FM+PB/
SBenzene 0 0 PB 0 0Toluene 0 PB/S 0 0 0Diphenyl 0 0 0 PB(1-S)/(2S) 0Temp. 100 100 100 100 100Pressure 550 15 15 15 465
H2 E B1.544
G H2 M
0.0036 (1 S)S 1- F F P
(1-x) 2
(1 )(1 ) F F HM FH E B HM
whereS
SF y F P y
S
-
8/13/2019 Plant Design 5 s
43/43
Stream Cost: Economic Potential
For HDA process
23)-(5.2($/yr),CostMat.Raw-
Valueproduct-By-ValueProductP2 E
24)-(5.2CostGasMakeup-
costToluene-PurgeofValueFuel
DiphenylofValueFuelValueBP
enzeneE