planning for brexit: talent implications€¦ · the referendum was announced. ever since...
TRANSCRIPT
P L A N N I N G F O R B R E X I T:
TA L E N T I M P L I C AT I O N S
M E R C E R S U R V E Y R E S U LT S
S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 6
© MERCER 2016 2
Here are the people you can contact to discuss the themes from the
survey and their implications for you in more detail:
M B L , U K TAL E N T
Mark Quinn
+442071783341
mark.quinn
@mercer.com
G E T I N T O U C H
TAL E N T
S T R AT E G Y
Natalie Jacquemin
+442071785363
natalie.jacquemin
@mercer.com
C O M M U N I C AT I O N S
Susannah Hines
+442071783812
susannah.hines
@mercer.com
E X E C U T I V E
R E WAR D
Amanda Flint
+442071783276
amanda.flint
@mercer.com
M O B I L I T Y
Kate Fitzpatrick
+442071785653
kate.fitzpatrick
@mercer.com
W O R K F O R C E
R E WAR D
David Wreford
+442071785598
david.wreford
@mercer.com
On the morning of 24th June the outcome of
the referendum was announced. Ever since
“Brexit” – or the UK’s vote to exit the European
Union – has been a major concern for the
business community.
With trade relationships worth £510bn
between the UK and EU, 2.1 million EU
citizens working in the UK, and 1.2 million UK
Nationals living in other EU countries
(according to the Office of National Statistics),
organisations have started to grapple with the
implications of the decision even though, some
two months on, the roadmap remains unclear.
This report shares the responses of senior HR,
Talent and Reward directors in over 180
organisations to questions covering the
spectrum of issues likely to be affected by the
referendum vote.
O P E N I N G T H O U G H T S
© MERCER 2016 3
6 2 % W I S H T O
R E P L I C AT E E X I S T I N G
E U A R R A N G E M E N T S
T H R O U G H A N E E A
A R R A N G E M E N T
3 6 % O F O R G A N I S AT I O N S E I T H E R
H AV E O R W I L L R E V I E W T H E
C O S T I M PA C T O F C U R R E N C Y
D E VA L U AT I O N O N T H E I R G L O B A L
M O B I L I T Y P O P U L AT I O N
5 8 % E N V I S A G E W O R K F O R C E
P L A N S W I L L C H A N G E I N T H E
L O N G E R T E R M
7 6 % A R E C O N C E R N E D
A B O U T A D D I T I O N A L
O R G A N I S AT I O N A L
E F F O R T W I T H L I T T L E
O R N O R E S O U R C E
7 2 % O F O R G A N I S AT I O N S
R E P O R T T H AT E M P L O Y E E S
A R E “ S O M E W H AT
C O N C E R N E D ” B Y T H E
I M PA C T O F T H E V O T E
Y E T O N LY 11 % A R E
C O M M U N I C AT I N G
O P E N LY AT T H I S
S TA G E
8 2 % O F
O R G A N I S AT I O N S F E E L
R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R
C O M M U N I C AT I N G
W I T H E M P L O Y E E S
A B O U T T H E I M PA C T
T H E H E A D L I N E S
© MERCER 2016 4 © MERCER 2016 4
P L A N N I N G F O R B R E X I T:
TA L E N T I M P L I C AT I O N S
SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS
© MERCER 2016 5
• 82% of the employers surveyed feel
either very or somewhat
responsible for communicating with
employees about the implications of
the EU referendum result.
• Employers who are communicating
appear to be focussing on providing
reassurance to employees, with the
economic outlook for the
company and job security being
the most discussed issues.
• Interestingly, the survey also
highlighted opportunities to work
abroad, diversity and international
mobility as other key issue.
E M P L OY ER S B E L I E V E
T H E Y H AV E A
R E S P O N S I B I L I TY TO
C O M M U N I C AT E T H E
I M PAC T O F B R E X I T TO
T H E I R E M P L OY E E S • Just 39% feel communications will be
affected in the next three months.
• 74% believe communications will be
affected in the next 12 months.
T H E R E W I L L B E A B I G G E R
L O N G E R T E R M I M PAC T O N
C O M M U N I C AT I O N S
• 74% of employers see employees as
somewhat concerned or very
concerned about the future.
E M P L OY EE S AR E
C O N C E R N E D
Employers should take a considered approach to communications whilst
uncertainty exists. Some aspects to consider include:
• Be transparent in what Brexit means to the company and ensure the
communications are delivered in a timely manner;
• Don’t give uncertain facts – stick to known facts to avoid any confusion;
• Be aware of unintended outcomes, don’t build a need or concern if you are
unable to offer further information;
• Don’t just focus on one employee segment – Brexit will affect all employees;
• Consider your channels, when employees are feeling vulnerable, face to face
interaction is best and should be delivered by line managers;
• Be sensitive to the human aspect of the referendum recognising that it was an
emotive and personal experience for all employees; and
• Aim to use communications to bring employees together by referring to your
Company vision and values.
E M P L O Y E E C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
© MERCER 2016 6
O R G AN I S AT I O N S
AN T I C I PAT E A F O C U S
O N B U I L D
• There is an emerging impact on
workforce planning, but this
will occur over time.
• 17% anticipate a shorter term
impact on workforce planning.
• 42% anticipate a medium term
impact on workforce planning.
• 58% anticipate a longer term
impact on workforce planning.
AN T I C I PAT E D I M PAC T S O N
W O R K F O R C E P L AN N I N G
AR E L O N G E R T E R M
M O S T O R G AN I S AT I O N S
AR E I N ‘ WAI T AN D S E E ’
M O D E
• 28% expect changes to workforce
structure.
• 47% anticipate the HR delivery
model to change.
“At this stage
we have not
planned much.”
“Completely
depends.”
“All in
limbo.”
• The concern over the loss of access to
the EEA/EU workforce, and concerns
over retaining EEA/EU high potentials,
has created a stronger focus on
recruiting from within the UK and
improving development programmes
for existing staff.
• 66% anticipate focusing on “build”
– developing and promoting talent
from within.
• 21% of anticipate focusing on
“buy” – hiring from the external
labour pool.
• 13% anticipate focusing on
“borrow” – contract or temporary
arrangement.
• 11% of organisations currently
anticipate that some jobs may move
from the UK to other locations.
There is a natural tension between
waiting to understand what workforce is
needed - taking account of external
factors (i.e. demand), and having
enough time to create a workforce with
the right skills (i.e. supply).
The former is in flux, and the latter
takes time. Scenario planning helps HR
become more agile and responsive, by
anticipating different likely futures and
deciding on the best plan of action
under each scenario, in advance.
T A L E N T M A N A G E M E N T
© MERCER 2016 7
G L O B A L M O B I L I T Y
D E VAL U AT I O N O F G B P I S
H AV I N G T H E L AR G E S T
I M M E D I AT E I M PAC T O N
M O B I L I T Y P O L I C Y
I M M I GR AT I O N
C H AN G E S AR E A
P R I M ARY C O M C ER N
F O R E X PAT R I AT E S
T H E M AJ O R I T Y O F
O R G AN I S AT I O N S
H AV E N O T C H AN G E D
T H E I R M O B I L I TY
P R O G R AM M ES Y E T
The devaluation of GBP against most
major currencies since 23 June 2016
has negatively impacted the value of
salary and allowances paid exclusively
in GBP, which in turn has generated
queries regarding currency protection
mechanisms and the payment and
timing of cost of living adjustments in
particular.
(It is important to remember however
that those not paid in GBP are likely to
have benefited in the short term).
• Only 2% of organisations reported
that the UK referendum result has
had a significant impact on their
current mobility programme with
regard to assignments into/out of the
UK.
• 26% identified some impact,
with the remaining 72%
reporting no impact.
• 13% of organisations do expect to
see a decrease in UK inbound
assignee numbers over the next two
years, but 57% say that it is too soon
to tell.
• Only 14% of respondent organisations
have conducted any cost analysis in
response to the GBP devaluation, but
another 22% anticipate doing this next
quarter.
• One-third of organisations reported that
in light of the devaluation of GBP, Long
Term Assignees had expressed concern
or requested additional compensation.
• 18% have allowed long-term assignees to
split their pay or be paid in an alternate
currency as a result of the referendum
result.
• 22% have indeed conducted an interim
cost of living or currency review for their
long-term assignees, with another 11%
considering it.
• Respondents reported a wide range of
practice regarding the exchange rates
used to set assignment compensation and
allowances in the first place, so of the
magnitude of the devaluation will vary by
organisation depending on the rates used.
• Multiple organisations reported
receiving queries from EU nationals
resident in the UK, seeking assurances
as to the longer term viability of their
position, as well as requests for
support in relation to permanent
residence applications from eligible
employees.
© MERCER 2016 8
H O W E V E R T H E R E I S
G E N E R AL AG R E E M E N T
T H AT R E WAR D F O R K E Y
TAL E N T W I L L G O U P
AN T I C I PAT E D I M PAC T S O N
W O R K F O R C E P L AN N I N G
AR E L O N G E R T E R M
O R G AN I S AT I O N S AR E
U N C L E AR AB O U T W H AT
T H E E U R E F E R E N D U M
M E AN S F O R R E WAR D
AC R O S S T H E I R
O R G AN I S AT I O N • 50% of organisations believe that there
will either be a marginal
(35%) or significant (35%) increase
in market pay for key talent.
Whilst most organisations are adopting the ‘wait and see’ approach, some are taking
the opportunity to review their current positions, understand the options available
and develop response strategies in line with their strategic workforce planning
outcomes.
• Whilst 2/3rds of organisations
anticipate financial implications
of Brexit;
...less than half anticipate
additional challenges with
the availability, attraction and
retention of talent, and
… 41% perceive that there will
be no impact on market pay
level, and where they do
perceive an impact they are
divided on whether this will have
a marginal inflationary (30%) or
deflationary (27%) impact.
“Reward impact
is largely
unknown”
“Most
organisations
are ‘waiting
to see’.”
“Key talent
will be a
priority.”
• 3/4 of organisations do not anticipate
changing their reward management
practices.
• A small population will be either
centralising or decentralising
their governance to a greater
extent.
• 94% will be maintaining the current
basis for rewarding their staff.
• Few organisations will be adjusting their
current pay and bonus budgets as a
result of the EU referendum.
• In keeping with participant views that
the longer-terms implications for Brexit
can not be fully understood
organisations see little impact on future
pay and bonus budgets.
W O R K F O R C E R E W A R D
© MERCER 2016 9
E X E C U T I V E R E W A R D – F S & O T H E R S E C T O R S
P L AY I N G I T S AF E I N F S ,
K E E P I N G I N L I N E W I T H
THE VARI ABLE PAY CAP
G RE ATE R I NTE RE S T I N
P E R F O R M AN C E G R AN T I N G
P L AN S , L E S S I N T E R E S T I N
E X T E N D I N G H O L D I N G
P E R I O D S
D I V I D E D O P I N I ON S O N
T H E E F F E C T O F
L O S I N G E U B U S I N E S S
AR R AN G E M E N T S • The vast majority of our respondents
were considering including flexibility
within the remuneration policy for
variable pay to exceed the 2x fixed pay
cap.
• 6% had just reviewed their
remuneration policy.
• 8% are unable to disapply the cap.
• 8% already had a remuneration
policy with built in flexibility.
• Clearly, companies are keeping within
the boundaries in Financial Services
and this is not the time for radical
change.
• 40% will invest in mainly existing
non-UK EU locations (e.g. Dublin,
Lux).
• 33% will set up mainly new locations
outside the UK.
• 27% will invest in business
developments outside the EU
“Huge
implications for
FS companies”
“Not the time
for increasing
pay packets”
“No
extensions
on holding
periods”
• The majority of companies responding to
this section currently have either a
performance vesting plan or performance
granting plan.
• 8% of companies plan on introducing a
combined performance granting/vesting
plan.
• 3% plan on introducing a performance
granting plan, equally to performance
vesting plan.
• There was equal interest in assessing
performance granting by discretionary
forms of company / individual
performance with less onus on
formulaic performance assessment.
• Organisations tend to consider payout by
the total variable pay compared to each
component.
• Only 4% of companies are extending post-
vesting holding periods from 6 months to 1
year.
For FS organisations, early planning
on location strategy will need to take
account of Talent supply alongside
other considerations. Most
organisations are adopting the ‘wait
and see’ approach whilst remaining
ready to adapt as the landscape
unfolds.
© MERCER 2016 10 © MERCER 2016 10
P L A N N I N G F O R B R E X I T:
TA L E N T I M P L I C AT I O N S
CLOSING THOUGHTS
© MERCER 2016 11
S H O R T T E R M R E A C T I O N S
A R E F O C U S E D O N
M A N A G I N G G L O B A L LY
M O B I L E P O P U L AT I O N S
E N G A G I N G I N O P E N
D I A L O G U E W I T H
E M P L O Y E E S I S
C R U C I A L
TA K I N G T H E
O P P O R T U N I T Y
T O E M B R A C E T H E
C H A N G E
The immediate reaction of businesses is that
they wish to replicate existing EU
arrangements as much as possible through
an EEA or EEA style arrangement (62%).
In relation to pay policy – at both “executive”
and an “all employee” levels – the majority of
respondents are in a “wait and see” cycle,
particularly in the Financial Services sector.
An early area of focus and action relates to
the globally mobile employee group –
particularly for long-term assignees (33% of
organisations) with a high volume of
individual queries affecting Cost Of Living
Allowance (COLA) adjustments, FX
movements, and future security of moves –
both into and out of the UK. 36% of
organisations either have or will review the
cost impact of currency devaluation on their
GM population: a high response so early in
the Brexit process.
Our respondents indicate that
businesses feel a duty to communicate
with employees about the impact of
leaving the EU (82% of employers feel
either very or somewhat responsible) –
and with good reason: 72% of
organisations report that they feel that
employees are at least “somewhat
concerned” by the impact of the vote
and 48% believe it will reduce or
significantly reduce morale.
However only 11% of respondents are
communicating openly at this stage
(due to uncertainty). Initially
conversations have focussed on
economic outlook for organisations
(64%) and job security (48%).
58% of organisations envisage their
workforce plans changing in the
longer term (>2 years) with an
overwhelming majority suggesting
an increase on developing and
promoting Talent from within
(66%).
There are some concerns about the
impact of additional effort within
organisations (including the HR
function) from 76% of respondents,
but with little or no additional
resource.
C L O S I N G T H O U G H T S
© MERCER 2016 12
Data confidentiality standards
To ensure the confidentiality of all data, a minimum number of observations is required in order for statistics to be displayed.
Three organisations must report at least three observations for a variable in order for the mean and frequencies to be
displayed.
Four organisations and four observations are required for display of the median.
Five organisations reporting at least five observations are required to display 25th and 75th percentiles.
In single-answer questions the total may not equal 100% due to rounding.
In multiple-answers questions organisations may indicate more than one option, therefore the total may exceed 100%.
A double hyphen i.e. “--” has been indicated where there are insufficient data for analysis.
Survey usage
The information and data contained in this report are for information purposes only and are not intended nor implied to be a
substitute for professional advice. In no event will Mercer be liable to you or to any third party for any decision made or action taken
in reliance of the results obtained through the use of the information and/or data contained or provided herein.
D A T A C O N F I D E N T I A L I T Y A N D S U R V E Y U S A G E
© MERCER 2016 13