pilot study of a configuration management application in a gis environment november 28, 2006
DESCRIPTION
Montgomery County, Maryland Department of Technology Services (DTS) Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Pilot Study of a Configuration Management Application in a GIS Environment November 28, 2006 ESRI Mid-Atlantic User Group Conference 2006. Presentation Outline. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Montgomery County, MarylandDepartment of Technology Services (DTS)Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Pilot Study of a Configuration Management Application in a GIS Environment
November 28, 2006
ESRI Mid-Atlantic User Group Conference 2006
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
2
Presentation Outline
Introduction GIS Organization Customer – Public Safety 911 Issues and Challenges (for GIS and CM)
Configuration Management Overview CM Processes and Fundamentals Software Development versus Data Management CM Application in a GIS Environment
Implementation Process Improvements for GIS and CM Parallel Development and Repeatable Processes Improved Quality Control and Quality Assurance
How You Can Get Started For GIS CM and GIS Industry
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
3
Chief Information Officer (CIO)Alisoun Moore
Chief Technology Officer (CTO)Mike Knuppel
Enterprise Applications Enterprise Services Enterprise Infrastructure Telecommunications
• Project Requirements• Application Development
• “e-Montgomery”• Enterprise Systems Services• Geographic Information
Systems (GIS)
• Client Computer Support• Help Desk Services• Server Support• Public Safety Support
(24/7 DTS Support)
• Host Operations• Data Security• Fibernet / Wide Area
Network (WAN) Support
• Telephone Services• 800 Mhz Radio
Management and Repair• Engineering Services
Decentralized Technology Teams Across County Government; Often use Workgroups to Enable Teamwork and Collaboration
• Also, Other Departments and Agencies May Have Small Technology Teams as Well• Health and Human Services (HHS)• Department of Liquor Control (DLC)• Department of Finance• Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPWT)
MCG Department of Technology Services
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
4
County-wide GIS Services
GIS Team 14 GIS Specialists 8 Servers 90+ Databases 200+ Layers
Services Produce Maps for County County and Enterprise -Wide
Geospatial services (Web, Geo databases)
Special projects Board of Elections Board of Education Public Safety Etc.
The Customer – Public Safety Public Safety Data System (PSDS) Emergency 911 System Data Center Operations
24 X 7 Police and Fire/Rescue Geo Data
Critical Data Maps in all Police Cars & Fire
Apparatus, Stations Dispatch Vehicle Routing Address Verification & Location
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
5
Issues and Challenges
Operational GIS Process, Procedures
Social Comfort Zones
Data Nature of Geo Data
Changing, Growing Database Integrity
Missing, Null fields Data Accuracy
Wrong police beat assignments
System Complexity (Business Systems vs. GIS Systems) Mainframe: Traditional, tabular, data
entry, long time GIS: New, non-traditional, complex,
constantly changing, no long-term testing
Public Safety Data Data Experts and Specialists
In GIS, not Public Safety Nature of Data
Public Safety in Infancy stage
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
6
Phases of Commitment
Time
Co
mm
itm
ent
Awareness
Understanding
Trial Use
Begin to Adapt
Institutionalize
Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (SEI), from D.R. Conner and R.W. Patterson “Building Commitment to Organizational Change”, Training and Development Journal, 18-30; April 1982.
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
7
Receptiveness to New Technology
2.5 %
13.5 %
34 % 34 %
16 %
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Innovators EarlyAdaptors
EarlyMajority
Late Majority Laggards
Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (SEI), from E.M. Rogers “Diffusion of Innovation”, Free Press, New York, NY; 1983.
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
8
Configuration Management
Engineering Discipline Processes and technologies to identify and control items Engineering, Software Development, IT fields Standards: DOD, MIL, IEEE, ISO…
What is CM? Identification of the system being created or released Control over the items making up the system and changes to the system Auditing and analyzing what is being created and released Reporting and tracking events on the system
Where is CM in the GIS field? Does not exist No case studies Little or no resource information
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
9
CM Fundamentals
1. Identification Identify configuration items of a
system Requirements, deliverables, end
products, pieces of a deliverable, code, designs, executables, tools, test cases
Create a baseline (snapshot)
2. Control Control changes to configuration
items Version control, change control,
build management (software), release engineering
CM Tools
3. Audit Analyze the baselines and
processes Assign action items for issues
and non-compliance CM Improvement
4. Status Accounting Report on events Systematically collect, record
and report meaningful CM data Measurable, repeatable
Includes metrics, audit results, history, tracking effort, traceability
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
10
The CM Challenge for GIS
Data Production Group GEO Load for PSDS is not
Software Development Lifecycle of Software Development
is not the same as Data Mgt Spiral Model – maybe
CM Tools GIS data managed by GIS
software Proprietary database Incompatible tools
CM tool like ClearCase cannot recognize the ArcInfo data structures
CM Methodologies Around for Software Development Shared terminology Shared culture and discipline
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
11
Software Development vs. Data Management
Software Development
CM Processes: exist, tried-tested,
improved
CM Tools: exist, tried-tested,
improved
Models, Patterns, Terminology established
Data Management
CM Processes: No case studies
CM Tools: Not created for DM
Models: Database Management
Models, Data Management Techniques are used
versus
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
12
What Can Be Done?
GIS Side Formalize Processes
Data Management Quality Control / Assurance According to industry AND to
department culture Team Receptiveness
Automate as much as possible Writing scripts; documenting expert
procedures Leverage in-house expertise
Ensure 100% Data Integrity Goes back to issues with missing
fields, links, keys or null values
CM Side Match CM concepts to GIS
processes Identification of layers, modules Control changes at high level Report on changes per release
Establish business rules to enforce CM concepts
Apply CM tools where applicable Problem Management Version Control
Scripts and automated QC tools SQL stored procedures Not for layers or workspaces Maybe for workspace baselines
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
13
Configuration & Process Management for GIS
Improvement Goals Decrease Mean Time Between
Deliveries Frequent deliveries = better QC
and management of changes Error fixes manageable per delivery
Establish Release Dates Consistent delivery schedule
increases customer satisfaction, trust and manages expectations
Don’t keep customer waiting Always know when new Geo Data
is arriving
QC Automation Catch systematic errors with tool Decrease manual labor efforts
GIS Data Management Process Formalize the Process
GIS has control over this process Re-use current ideas and move
forward with progress Add new process design, make
formal procedures, repeatable
Requirements Management Communication with End-Users on
requirements Quarterly CAB Meetings
Freeze Requirements Change Control Process for new
requirements
Public Safety Requires Frequent Updates to Map & Geo Data
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
14
Change Control
Change Advisory Board (CAB) Quarterly Meetings with Key
Personnel DTS GIS DTS Public Safety Support Police Department Fire/Rescue Services
Requirements Freeze & Sign-Off Requirements Form
Change Management Change Request Form
Requirements Changes DTS Issues Tracking System
Data Changes Specific Police/Fire Data Changes
Data Repositories (Directories) Source
Master copy of all layers Owner can copy over data No edits made in source directories
Workspace Copy from Source directory to
Workspace directory Owner makes edits QA/QC on layer in workspace
before copy back to Source Release
Final QA/QC on layer(s) to be released
Only 1 Owner GIS Manger authorizes release
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
15
GIS Source Server - Responsibilities
Category # Layers OwnerBasemap 22 Lian
Census 7 Lian
DEM 3 Lian
DHCA 1 Lian
DHHS 1 Dan
Elections 7 Vicky
Environmental 7 Lian
Finance 3 Lian
Fire 14 Vicky
Grids 6 Barb
Historic 2 Barb
Landuse 5 Barb
Locations 19 Tim
Metadata 177 Lian
OCE 10 Carol
Category # Layers OwnerOrthophotos 6 Apollo
Permitting 3 Lian
Planning 5 Yanli
Police 4 Vicky
Political_mc 4 Celina
Political_other 1 Celina
Property 3 Lian
DPW&T 9 Barb
Recreation 4 Dan
Regional 2 Celina
Schools 10 Tim
Sheriff 2 Celina
Utilities 15 Carol
USPS 2 Celina
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
16
Parallel Development & Repeatable Process GIS Work on Mainline Branch
Copy from Source to Workspace Edits Made in Workspace Directory Only
Public Safety Release on PS Branch Allows for Parallel Working Environment
Data Freeze Copy from Source to Staging Area (PSDS) Final QA/QC on ALL Layers
Release Dates Established Quarterly Regular Intervals, Do Not Change
Mainline Development
GIS Data Freeze GIS Data Freeze
GIS DM Process
PS Conversion Process
Release A-PS
GIS QC Process
Release A
GIS DM Process
Release B Release C
Release B-PS Release C-PS
GIS DM Process
GIS QC Process GIS QC Process
PS Conversion Process PS Conversion Process
Public Safety Branch (for delivery only)
GIS Data Freeze
Repeatable Process GIS Data Management Quality Control Process Automation when possible Lifecycle of the GIS DM/QC Process – from
release to release Repeat after each GIS product Release
Public Safety Release Process Consists of a snapshot of the GIS product
Release Conversion process applied Lifecycle ends with delivery to Public Safety Repeat upon next GIS Release product
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
17
Automated QA/QC Concept
CM Implications on GIS System Development Life-Cycle Create Manage Publish Maintain
Automated QA/QC in Public Safety Database Development Matching Geo Databases between
Development and Production Version Control Data Acceptance
QA/QC and Output Process Source Code Revisions Data Preparation Map File Conversion Tiling Output Delivery
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
18
GIS Public Safety Data Delivery Process1. Data Readiness
• Create Data Layer• Topology Check• QA/QC Automation
• Arc/Info & GeoDB• Tier 1 – Data Owners• Tier 2 – QC Team• Tier 3 – Final QC
• QA/QC Report & Fixes• Agency Owner QA
• Police / FRS• Sign off from Customer
• Data Freeze
2. Pre-Conversion• Copy Layers from Source to Staging Area• Add Common Convert Items• Run Convert Tools, AML to Copy Source Fields to Converted Items• Drop Unnecessary Fields (Keep Convert ID#, etc.)• Replace “null” With “.” For Each Converted Layer• QA/QC: Unique ID, Full Population, Null Values• LUT Tables (street type, turn tables, etc.)
3. Conversion• One AML Calls All Routines• No Menu Selection (no prompts)• QA Conversion Results
• e.g., Layer / Feature / Text Conversion• Link With Source Layer to Check Attribute Conversion
4. Post-Processing• Single AML to Create ply, lin, pnt files (PLP)• Batch Program to Delete or Create PLP Directories• QA the PLP Output Files; Feature Count by Layer• Batch Program to Move PLP Files to Associated Directories• QA “Clines” Line Files
5. Tiling / Output• Automated Tiling• QA Tiled PLP Files Per Subdirectory – Feature Count Must Match by Layer• Public Safety Check List• Public Safety Export List• Notify PSDS Team• Police/FRS On-site Validation• User Feedback
Data Freeze
Ready For Release to PSDS
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
19
MCG/DTS: GIS CM for Public Safety
CM Analysis October 2005 for Public Safety February 2006 for GIS
GIS CM Stage Between “Trial Use” & “Begin to
Adapt”
CM Plan
Change Advisory Board (CAB) Requirements Management Change Control Process Issues Tracking (Problem Tickets)
Formalized Process Edit/Update Geo Data QA/QC Layers and Databases Streamline Delivery Process
CM Tools In-house scripts Forms Issues Tracking System
(enterprise-wide)
CM Tools Needed in GIS Software:
-Change Tracker-Versioning of Layers
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
20
Your Roadmap to GIS CM
Create a CM Plan Use Existing Templates as a
Guideline
Assessment & Risk Analysis Management Support How Receptive is Team?
Start Changing Mindset Now Get Used to Formalized Procedures
(such as CM)
Establish CAB or CCB
Implement Manual Processes for Operations/Business
Use CM Tools When Possible: AML, Scripts,
Stored Procedures, Documents
Use Version Control Forms, Lists, Spreadsheets Track Changes on High Level Excludes: Data Edits, Layer
Versioning **
** Need support from GIS Software vendors
Need Integrated CM Tools in GIS Software
CM Acceptance in GIS Industry
Plan According to Your Organization’s Needs
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
21
Contact Information
Department of Technology Services (DTS) - GIS21 Maryland Ave., Suite 350Rockville, MD 20850-2390
Enterprise Applications Division, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Apollo Teng, GIS Manager [email protected] 240-777-2883
Yanli Gong, Sr. GIS Specialist [email protected] 240-777-2886
Enterprise Services Division, Public Safety (PS) Heba Elbadawi, Public Safety Configuration Manager [email protected] 240-773-7234
Presentation Can Be Downloaded from the DTS GIS Website athttp://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/gis/docs/mug06_CM.ppt
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
22
Supplements
CM Plan Outline Template
Change Advisory Board Process Flowcharts Requirements Form (Template) Release Plan and Schedule (Template)
Change Control Process Change Request Form (Template) Issues Tracking - Sample Problem Ticket
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
23
CM Plan Outline (Sample 1)
Introduction Purpose CM Overview Scope Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations References
Management & Organization Organization Responsibilities CM Policy Procedures, Methodology & Tools
Configuration Management Process Configuration Identification
Identification Methods Labeling Conventions Project Baselines CM Repositories
Configuration Control Change Control Change Advisory Board (CAB)
Configuration Status Accounting Peer Review CM Status Reports CM Logs and Database
Audit and Review Function Configuration Audit (FCA) Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)
Project Media Library
Vendor / Contractor Control If applicable
Resources, Schedules, Points of Contact CM Roll-Out Schedule Geo Data Delivery Plan & Schedule
CM Risks and Opportunities
Supplemental Information
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
24
CM Plan Outline (Sample 2)
Introduction
CM Management Organization Responsibilities Project CM Dataset CM Developed Application CM Final Product CM Applicable Policies, Directives, Procedures
CM Activities Configuration Identification
Identification Methods Naming, Labeling Conventions Acquiring Configuration Items
Configuration Control Change Process: Request, Evaluate,
Approve, Implement Change Control Board (CCB)
Configuration Status Accounting Configuration Audit and Review
Function Configuration Audit (FCA) Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)
Interface Control
Records Inventory
Resources and Points of Contact Software Resources Training Requirements in Support of the
Plan
CM Plan Maintenance
References
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
25
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
26
Department of Technology Services (DTS) Enterprise Applications Division (EAD) GIS Configuration Management
Requirements Specifications and Sign-Off
For CM Use
GIS-RQ v1.0
This form is used to document the requirements needed and requested changes to the Public Safety Geo Data in the CAD System for the next scheduled Geo data load as specified below. This form shall be filled out during (or shortly thereafter) the GIS Quarterly Change Advisory Board (CAB) Meeting (previously called the GIS Quarterly Review Meeting) and sign-off signatures shall be obtained by members of the Joint Public Safety / GIS Change Advisory Board (MCPD, MCFRS, DTS GIS, DTS PSDS). (1) All requirements to be considered for the target PS Geo Data release shall be documented in this form by DTS PSDS PM or CM at the time of the PS GIS CAB Meeting. (2) DTS PSDS CM shall request the sign-off from MCPD and MCFRS to signify requirements freeze and accuracy, with DTS GIS and DTS PS as witnesses. (Additional requirements details may
still be obtained during impact analysis and/or data development). (3) DTS GIS shall publish the following: a) Target Release Work Plan and b) Target Release Schedule. The Work Plan and Schedule are a resulting effort of the GIS Impact Analysis of the
requested data changes (requirements) and shall document for each requested requirement if the requirement will be or will not be included in the target release. The Work Plan and Schedule shall be submitted to the end-users, referencing the requirements by “Req ID”. A requirement may be included in a release with modifications, based on the resulting GIS Impact Analysis. Such modifications must also be documented and communicated to the end-users in the submitted Work Plan.
Change Advisory Board Meeting Information
Date of Meeting: Meeting Location:
Attendees Public Safety (DTS):
GIS (DTS): MC Police Department:
MC Fire and Rescue Service: Target Release Information
Requirements Specifications ID: GIS-RQ-<CustomProp>
Planned Release Type: Full Partial (specify data layer):
Planned Release Name: (Final Release Name shall be identified in the Work Plan)
Planned Release Date or Month: (Final Release Date shall be listed in the Work Plan)
List all requirements discussed and agreed upon during the CAB Meeting for the Target Release. For each requirement, provide (1) a brief high-level description of the requirement, (2) the requestor’s department (MCPD or MCFRS), (3) a
detailed description of the requirement describing what is needed, and (3) the severity (or impact) of not having this implemented item. Requirement ID format = GIS-<Release_ID>-R<Seq#> Requirements Specifications
Requirements ID
Item Req By Requirements Severity / Impact
GIS-<CustomProp>-R001
GIS-<CustomProp>-R002
GIS-<CustomProp>-R003
GIS-<CustomProp>-R004
GIS-<CustomProp>-R005
Department of Technology Services (DTS) Enterprise Applications Division (EAD) GIS Configuration Management
Release Work Plan and Schedule
For CM Use
GIS-WP v1.0
This form is used to document the work plan and schedule for the next scheduled Geo data load as described below. This form shall be filled out upon completion of the requirements review and impact analysis by the GIS team and shall be submitted to the Joint Public Safety / GIS Change Advisory Board (MCPD, MCFRS, DTS GIS, DTS PSDS). (1) All requirements to be considered for the target PS Geo Data release shall be documented in the CM form titled “Requirements Specification and Sign-Off” (filename GIS-RQ-<release>
where <release> is the target geo data release version). Sign-off of the requirements specs is required by all members of the GIS CAB. (2) DTS GIS shall perform a review of all documented requirements and conduct an impact analysis of each described requi rement. (3) Upon completion of the impact analysis, DTS GIS shall publish the Work Plan and Schedule describing any deviations, if any, from the agreed upon requirements. The Work Plan and
Schedule shall explicitly note which requirements will be or will not be a part of the target release; furthermore, any requirement included in a release with modifications from the original baselined requirement shall be noted in this form.
(4) If there are no deviations from the original baselined requirements, this form is to be submitted to the users. (5) If there are deviations from the original baselined requirements, sign-off signatures must be re-obtained in the section following the schedule.
Target Release Information
Corresponding Requirements Specifications ID: GIS-RQ-xxxx
Work Plan ID: GIS-WP-<CustomProp>
Release Type: Full Partial (specify data layer):
Release Name:
Release Date or Month:
Work Plan and Schedule Document the work plan for the target release, including the Planned Dates for a) data freeze, b) interim data deliveries, if needed, c) PSDS
data delivery for user test purposes and d) expected PSDS Production deployment. Document the “Next Steps” and any coordinating efforts required for this target release. The Plan 1. <Release Name>
1.1. Data Freeze: _________________ 1.2. GIS Delivery to PSDS: _________________ 1.3. Questions or Comments
1.3.1. Next Steps 1. <Release Name>
1.1. Requirements Specifications Matrix For each requirement listed in the Requirements Specification form, identify the Approval Status of the requirement. This matrix is to be filled
out by the GIS Manager documenting the results of the requirements review and impact analysis. Use one of the following status codes
Status Description of Status APPROVED Requirement shall be included in the target release
APPROVED WITH COMMENTS Requirement shall be included in the target release, but with modifications FUTURE Requirement will be included in a subsequent release (not this release)
REJECTED Requirement will not be implemented
Requirement
ID Item Req By Approval Status Comment
GIS-xxxx-R001
GIS-xxxx-R002
GIS-xxxx-R003
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
27
Department of Technology Services (DTS) Enterprise Applications Division (EAD) GIS Configuration Management
GIS Change Request Form
For CM Use
GIS-CR v1.0
This form is used to document a change request to the requirements or release scope of a Public Safety Geo Data release. This form can be initiated by any of the GIS, MCPD, MCFRS or DTS teams. This form primarily documents a change request to the requirements baseline of a Target Release. All change requests must be submitted to the GIS PS CAB for review and final approval. (1) Fill out the GIS Change Request form, describing the type of change being requested, such as additional or modified requirements. (2) Submit the GIS Change Request form to the PSDS PM or CM for logging. A CM Number will be issued for tracking purposes. (3) If the request originates from the Users, GIS will review and the request and either approve, reject or call another CAB Meeting if necessar y. The PSDS PM or CM will communicate the status
of the change requests to all parties. (4) If the request originate from DTS or GIS, the PSDS PM or CM will communicate with all parties on the change request and it final status.
Contact Information
Submitted By: (MCPD, MCFRS, DTS, etc.)
Date of Request:
Contact Name:
Phone:
Email: Type of Change Request Check the appropriate boxes describing the type of change:
Change to the Requirements Baseline Requirements Specification Form ID: GIS-RQ-<ID>
Add new requirement(s)
Modify existing requirement(s) Specify Requirement ID: GIS-<Release>-<Seq#>
Delete existing requirement(s) Specify Requirement ID: GIS-<Release>-<Seq#> Change Description
Status Tracking
Date Received: Date Reviewed:
Received By: Reviewed By:
Effort Estimation: Value Estimation: (Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High) (Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High)
Review Results: Approved for Target Release Release Name:
Assigned To:
Planned Completion Date:
Rejected Explain:
Deferred Until Later Future Release:
Return for Additional Information
Closed – Duplicate Request
Closed – OBE/Cancelled
November 28, 2006 Montgomery County, Maryland DTS GIS ESRI-MUG 2006 Conference
28
Magic Ticket # 159305 has been assigned to the DTS_GIS group by DTS_PS
Incident Number: 159305 Open Date: 7/11/2006 9:36:55 AM Client Name: Trent Bishop Client ID: BISHOT Client Phone: (240)773-7027 Client Department: Police Subject ID: PS_CAD_DATA Subject Description: PS CAD - Data Incident Description: Addressed CADLIVE b 106.2-107.3 / AVS 31.1 Address Discrepancy
1. Flagship Car Wash @ 2100 Chapman Ave, Beat 1A1, Atom 271.
Verizon and the MD tax records show the above locations address listed as 975 Rollins Ave not 2100 Chapman Ave. The manager of the business states that he has documentation from Rockville City Planning that the address should be 2100 Chapman Ave. The 2100 Blk Chapman Ave is not in the address server. The range ends at 2099 Chapman Ave. The building footprint is displaying 975 on the map.
Please create a CPN for the location when the correct address is established. ____________________ J. Miller, 7/14: On Live - Extended street address range from 2099 to 2199. Added CPN. _____________________ J. Miller, 7/14: GIS Team, please correct street addess range and building footprint as described above. Contact Trent Bishop if you have questions.
C. Azevedo, GIS, 9/1/06: The 2100 block is in place on Chapman Ave. and will go into the upcoming delivery.
C. Azevedo, GIS, 10/17/06: Checked the converted data. The 2100 block is in place. _____________________________ J. Miller, 10/31: GIS Team: Trent thinks that the building footprint labeled 975 Rollins, should be labeled 2100 Chapman. Please look at this and relabel it if it is labeled incorrectly. If it is labeled correctly, please give Trent a call.
DTS_GIS - PS ticket assigned to group