[email protected] 1994-2001: the fragility of e learning pierre dillenbourg tecfa...

24
[email protected] .ch 1994-2001: The Fragility o e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning

1994-2001: The Fragility of e LearningPierre DillenbourgTECFAUniversity of Geneva

Page 2: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

You are not the only one

to face problems

Analysing breakdowns is a good heuristic

Teachers:

Researchers:

Page 3: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

er'

s ro

leTeach

er'

s ro

le

Page 4: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Loss of "time habits"

Confusion between flexibility and workload

How do we count time for students?

How do we count time for teachers?

Time is our bottleneck (more than bandwidth)

Page 5: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Balance knowledge magagement & pedagogical diversity

Page 6: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Is the Web constructivist?

Page 7: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text To much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much Too much text Too much text Too text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text much text Too much text Too much text Too text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text oo much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too muh text Too much text much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much txt Too much text Too much textToo much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much ext Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too uch text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text text Toomuch text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much txt Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text oo much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too mch text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too uch text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much ext Too much text Too much text Too much text Too muc text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Toomuch text Too much text Too much text Toomuch textToo much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text Too much text

Page 8: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Constructivism versus Learner Control

Deep versus shallow interactivity

>> Innovative situations are fragile

Page 9: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Example 1(TECFA Virtual Campus):

Goal: Discover common mistakes in writing

multiple choice questionnaires

Page 12: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

This is not scientific research, just teacher experience, but raise

interesting issues

eLearning is not more fragile, but, in case of problems, adaptation is more

difficult

Page 13: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Example 2 (TECFA Virtual Campus):

Goal: Discover relationship between learning

theorie and families of educational software

Page 14: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

ArgueGraph ArgueGraph

Phase1Phase1

Page 15: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

ArgueGraphArgueGraph

Phase 2Phase 2

Page 16: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

ArgueGraphArgueGraph

Phase 3Phase 3

Page 17: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Design choices

Immediate FB

Delayed FB

Microworld FB

Theories

Behavioursim

Constructivism

Metacognition

ArgueGraphArgueGraph

Phase 4Phase 4

Page 18: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

ArgueGraph DataArgueGraph Data (Exp.3)(Exp.3)

Reformulation Justification

Solo 57 % 43 %

Duo 15 % 85 %

Page 19: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

Accept Condition Discard

No Conflict 28 1 3

Conflict 23 11 1

"We answer 3 because motivation is important"

"We answer 3 because motivation is important"

"We choose 3 because 2 does not work"

"We choose 3 because 2 does not work"

ArgueGraph DataArgueGraph Data (Exp.3)(Exp.3)

"We answer 2 if the learner is a child but we answer 3 for adult learners"

"We answer 2 if the learner is a child but we answer 3 for adult learners"

Page 20: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

New Union Victory

No Conflict 6 16 10

Conflict 14 8 13

X2=6.2, p<.05)

ArgueGraph DataArgueGraph Data (Exp.3)(Exp.3)

Arg(AB) <> Arg(A) & Arg(AB) <> Arg(B)

Arg(AB) <> Arg(A) & Arg(AB) <> Arg(B)

Arg(AB) =Arg(A) or

Arg(AB) =Arg(B )

Arg(AB) =Arg(A) or

Arg(AB) =Arg(B )Arg(AB)=Arg(A) U Arg(B )Arg(AB)=Arg(A) U Arg(B )

Page 21: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

New version of ArgueGraphNew version of ArgueGraph

Page 22: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

What's the problem with exp 4 ?What's the problem with exp 4 ?

pseudo-task

debriefing

debriefing

Coffee-break

1 week

Exp 1-3Exp 1-3 Exp 4Exp 4

pseudo-task

Page 23: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

You are not the only one

to face problems

Analysing breakdowns is a good heuristic

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Problems shake routine

Time-sensitive dynamics of

self-representation and

group representationsTime-sensitive dynamics of

self-representation and

group representations

Page 24: Pierre.Dillenbourg@tecfa.unige.ch 1994-2001: The Fragility of e Learning Pierre Dillenbourg TECFA University of Geneva

[email protected]

European Conference onEuropean Conference on

Computer-Supported Computer-Supported

Collaborative LearningCollaborative Learning

MaastrichtMaastricht

March 22-24, 2001March 22-24, 2001