pictometry international v. geospan
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
1/8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, a Delaware
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEOSPAN CORPORATION, a
Minnesota Corporation
Defendant.
Case No. _______________________
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff, Pictometry International Corp. (Pictometry), by and through its counsel,
brings this complaint against Geospan Corp. (Geospan), as follows:
PARTIES
1. Pictometry is a Delaware corporation which has its principal place of business in
Rochester, New York.
2. Geospan is a Minnesota Corporation which has its principal place of business
located at 10900 73rd
Ave. North, Suite 36, Maple Grove, Minnesota.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. Pictometry incorporates each of its previous allegations.
4. This is a civil action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United
States and, more specifically, under Title 35 U.S.C. 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285.
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
2/8
5. This action involves a federal question in that it arises from Geospans
infringement of Pictometrys patent rights, and jurisdiction over the present subject matter is
conferred upon this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).
6. This Court has general personal jurisdiction over Geospan in this action as it is
registered in, and maintains a principal place of business within, the State of Minnesota.
7. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1400, and 1391(b) and
(c).
BACKGROUND
8. Since its inception in 1995, Pictometrys business has been devoted entirely to
aerial photogrammetry.1
Using its proprietary methods and apparatuses, Pictometrys aircraft fly
over a specified geographic area and, using digital cameras, capture orthogonal and oblique
images of virtually every square foot of the area, including every structure or other feature
contained therein. Pictometry pioneered the ability to capture oblique aerial images, i.e., images
captured at an angle, typically 45 degrees, and process them on the fly such that the geographic
coordinates (longitude, latitude, and elevation) of each pixel in each image was calculated at
moment the oblique aerial image was captured. The apparatuses and processes developed by
Pictometry enable the creation of a photographic map on which accurate measurements of
distances, areas, and heights of features shown in the images can be made.
9. United States Patent 7,424,133 (the 133 Patent), entitled METHOD AND
APPARATUS FOR CAPTURING, GEOLOCATING AND MEASURING OBLIQUE
IMAGES, issued September 9, 2008. A copy of the 133 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
10. Pictometry is the owner by assignment of the 133 Patent.
1Photogrammetry is the science of making measurements on photographs.
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
3/8
11. As a part of its on-going efforts to lead the field in aerial photogrammetry,
Pictometry has expended considerable amounts of time, expertise, and money on the research
and development, patenting, marketing, promotion, manufacture, and distribution of its oblique
aerial technologies. As result of such efforts, Pictometry has developed new and more advanced
methods and apparatuses that enable users to, inter alia, display, geolocate, and take highly
measurements from the captured and processed oblique aerial images; technologies which are
encompassed in the claims of the 133 Patent.
12. Since its inception in 1994, Geospans business has been devoted primarily to the
use of terrestrial photogrammetry. Geospan uses ground-based vehicles, such as vans, to carry
photographic and computer equipment, along with sophisticated tracking systems. Geospan
acquires video images of the areas adjacent to the streets driven by the vans and processes such
images so that the location of objects appearing in the images can be determined. More recently,
Geospan has expanded its business into aerial photogrammetry.
13. Geospan maintains a website at www.geospan.com. A true and correct copy of
excerpts from Geospans website as accessed and printed August 27, 2013, are attached hereto as
Exhibit 2.
14. As shown on Geospans website, Geospan offers technology that enables a user to
make measurements on oblique aerial images stored on a database. Geospan markets this
technology as a part of its GEOVISTA Products and Services. (Ex. 2, pp. 1-3)
15. The photogrammetric services described and depicted on Geospans website
infringe one or more claims of the 133 Patent.
16. Sometime prior to January 19, 2011, the City of Branson, Missouri issued a
Request For Proposal (RFP) for Digital Orthophotography, Oblique Imagery, & Digital
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
4/8
Topographic Mapping. On January 19, 2011, Aerowest Optimal, Inc. (Aerowest) submitted a
response to this RFP. A true and correct copy of the response is attached as Exhibit 3, hereto. In
its response to the RFP, Aerowest identified Geospan as a subcontractor for the collection and
processing of oblique aerial imagery. Geospan represented that GEOVISTA imagery allows
users to see every location from every angle in a given area andmeasure anything accurately.
(Ex. 3, p. 1-3) (emphasis in bold and underlining added). Also in the response, Geospan offered
to provide its Oblique Imagery Viewing Software to the City of Branson at $ NO
ADDITIONAL CHARGE. Geospan stated that [t]his software will allow the user to view and
navigate on the oblique imagery andmeasure the distance, height, area, bearing, elevation, and
roof pitch of features in the images. (Id. at p. 1-12)
17. Geospan has contributed to the infringement and/or induced others to infringe one
or more claims of the 133 Patent.
18. Upon information and belief, Geospan is unable to pay any damages awarded
against it. Attached as Exhibit 4 hereto is a true and correct copy of an opinion issued by the
Minnesota Court of Appeals, case no. A12-0779, entitled Paul A. Torretta v. Theodore
Lachinski, et al. In affirming a judgment against Geospan brought by a minority shareholder and
former director of Geospan, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, quoting the findings of the district
court, stated the unfortunate truth is that the GeoSpan companies2
have never made money and
continue to lose money each year. (Ex. 4, p. 5)
2The GeoSpan companies refers to Geospan and GeoSpan.com, which was incorporated as aspin-off of Geospan. (Ex. C, p. 3)
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
5/8
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,424,133
19. Pictometry alleges and incorporates the foregoing paragraphs numbered 1 through
18 as though fully set forth herein.
20. This cause of action for patent infringement arises under 35 U.S.C. 271.
21. Pictometry owns all rights, title, and interest in the 133 Patent.
22. Upon information and belief, Geospan has directly infringed, and is continuing to
directly infringe, either literally or under the Doctrine of Equivalents, the 133 Patent by making,
using, selling, and/or offering to sell its GEOVISTA 3D Spatial Imaging system.
23. Geospan has induced and/or contributed to infringement of the 133 Patent and is
continuing to induce and/or contribute to infringement of the 133 Patent by, among other acts,
intentionally encouraging, causing, urging, and/or aiding others to directly infringe the 133
Patent, including, but not limited to, by offering to sell, selling, offering to lease, leasing, and/or
otherwise providing others with instructions, information, and assistance for practicing the
claimed invention.
24. All of the aforementioned infringing acts by Geospan are without the permission,
license, or consent of Pictometry.
25. Such acts of infringement by Geospan have been, and continue to be, willful and
deliberate, and Pictometry reasonably believes that such acts of infringement will continue in the
future unless enjoined by this Court.
26. By reason of Geospans acts of infringement, Pictometry has suffered and
continues to suffer irreparable harm and damages, including, but not limited to, lost sales, lost
market share, lost profits, damage to Pictometrys goodwill and reputation, and diminution of the
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
6/8
inherent value of the 133 Patent, in an amount to be determined at trial. Geospans infringement
further irreparably harms Pictometry by encouraging others to infringe the 133 Patent.
27. As a result of the continuing harm to Pictometry, the diminution of the value of
the 133 Patent, and Geospans inability to pay any money damages that might be awarded
against it, Pictometry has no adequate remedy at law for Geospans infringement of the 133
Patent.
WHEREFORE, Pictometry prays for the following relief and requests that this Court:
A. Enter a judgment finding that Geospan has directly infringed and/or induced
and/or contributed to the infringement of the 133 Patent;
B. Grant a preliminary and permanent injunction against the continued direct
infringement of the 133 Patent by Geospan, as well as any owners, officers, agents, servants,
employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns of Geospan, and others controlling, controlled by,
affiliated with, in privity with, or in active concert with Geospan, such injunction prohibiting the
making, use, sale or offering to sell, lease or offering to lease, of Geospans GEOVISTA
Products and Services;
C. Grant a preliminary and permanent injunction against the continued infringement
by inducement of the 133 Patent by Geospan, as well as any owners, officers, agents, servants,
employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns of Geospan, and others controlling, controlled by,
affiliated with, in privity with, or in active concert with Geospan, such injunction prohibiting
encouraging, causing, urging, and/or aiding others to directly infringe the 133 Patent, including,
but not limited to, by leasing, offering to lease and/or by providing to others any information,
instructions or assistance for making and/or using Geospans GEOVISTA Products and
Services.
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
7/8
D. Order the destruction of all infringing apparatuses and all materials intended to
instruct or induce others to make, use, sell or offer to sell, lease or offer to lease the same in the
possession, custody, or control of Geospan, as well as any owners, officers, agents, servants,
employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns of Geospan, and others controlling, controlled by,
affiliated with, in privity with, or in active concert with Geospan;
E. Order Geospan to identify all clients, customers, partners, employees, agents,
successors, assigns, and others having at least one infringing apparatus.
F. Order an accounting to determine and assess against Geospan, and award to
Pictometry, damages of not less than a reasonable royalty and including, but not limited to, all
lost profits, together with interest and costs, arising from infringement of the 133 Patent and
further award treble damages with interest against Geospan by reason of the willful and
deliberate nature of Geospans patent infringement;
G. Enter a judgment finding that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285 and
assess against Geospan, and award to Pictometry, its reasonable attorneys fees incurred in
bringing this action; and
H. Grant Pictometry such other and further relief as this Court may deem just.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiffs hereby demand a trial by jury of all issues so triable.
Dated this 28th day of August, 2013.
Respectfully submitted,
PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP.
By its attorneys,
s/Rachel K. Zimmerman
Rachel K. Zimmerman, Reg. No. 314,171
-
7/30/2019 Pictometry International v. Geospan
8/8
MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
3200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2215
Telephone: 612.332.5300