phase 2 esa cover letter - town of milton · results to the applicable 2011 moe standards; and...

77
SHAD & ASSOCIATES INC. GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS CONSULTING ENGINEERS 83 Citation Drive, Unit 9 Vaughan, Ontario, L4K 2Z6 Tel: (905) 760-5566 Fax: (905) 760-5567 www.shadinc.ca August 19, 2011 Reference Number: T11305 Royal Park Homes 65 Royalpark Way Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1J5 Attention: Mr. Doug Skeffington Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 149 Tremaine Rd & 31-33 Milton Hts. Cres. Milton, Ontario Please find enclosed the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report prepared for the above captioned site. Should you have any questions or require any clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact our office. We thank you for giving us this opportunity to be of service to you. Sincerely, Shad & Associates Inc. Houshang Shad, Ph.D., P. Eng. Principal

Upload: dotruc

Post on 07-Sep-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

SHAD & ASSOCIATES INC. GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS CONSULTING ENGINEERS 83 Citation Drive, Unit 9 Vaughan, Ontario, L4K 2Z6 Tel: (905) 760-5566 Fax: (905) 760-5567 www.shadinc.ca

August 19, 2011 Reference Number: T11305 Royal Park Homes 65 Royalpark Way Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1J5 Attention: Mr. Doug Skeffington

Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 149 Tremaine Rd & 31-33 Milton Hts. Cres. Milton, Ontario

Please find enclosed the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report prepared for the above captioned site. Should you have any questions or require any clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact our office. We thank you for giving us this opportunity to be of service to you. Sincerely, Shad & Associates Inc.

Houshang Shad, Ph.D., P. Eng. Principal

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment DRAFT company date address, Ontario Pinchin File: 48048.004

875 MAIN STREET WEST, UNIT #11, HAMILTON, ON L8S 4R9 TEL: (905) 577-6206 FAX: (905) 577-6207 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SERVICES FROM OFFICES ACROSS CANADA

www.pinchin.com 1-888-767-3330

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

31 & 33 Milton Heights Crescent and 149 Tremaine Road

Milton, Ontario

Royal Park Homes c/o Shad & Associates Inc.

83 Citation Drive, Unit 9 Vaughan, Ontario

L4K 2Z6

Attention: Mr. Houshang Shad

August 19, 2011

Pinchin File: 69386

Copyright © 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Environmental Ltd. (“Pinchin”) was retained by Shad & Associates Inc. (“Shad”) on behalf of Royal Park Homes (“Client”) to conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) of the property located at 31 and 33 Milton Heights Crescent and 149 Tremaine Road, Milton, Ontario (hereafter referred to as the “Site”). The Site was developed with three (3) residential dwellings, a shed and a commercial building occupied by a trucking operation and offices (“Site Buildings”).

The Phase II ESA was conducted by Pinchin at the request of Shad in relation to the potential acquisition and future redevelopment of the Site.

Based on the work completed, the following is a summary of the activities and findings of this Phase II ESA:

1. Pinchin supervised the Client-retained drilling contractor (Strong Soil Search Inc.) to advance eight (8) boreholes on August 8, 2011. The boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 6.10 metres below ground surface (“mbgs”). Five (5) of the eight (8) boreholes were instrumented with monitoring wells to enable groundwater monitoring and sampling. The boreholes were advanced using a CME 55 truck mounted drill rig;

2. The soil stratigraphy at the Site generally consisted of fill material (sand and gravel) throughout the Site to a maximum depth of 0.76 mbgs. Native subsurface material underlying the fill material was observed to generally consisted of clay with some silt and trace sand overlying silt with some sand and trace clay. Moist to wet soil conditions were generally observed at a maximum depth of approximately 4.1 mbgs;

3. Groundwater levels at the Site varied between 0.83 mbgs (BH314) and 2.08 mbgs (BH316). Inferred groundwater flow direction is expected to be towards the southeast based on topography and the presence of Sixteen Mile Creek located southeast of the Site;

4. Based on the Site specific information, the soil and groundwater quality was assessed based on the Table 2 Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Groundwater Condition, for residential/parkland/institutional land use and medium and fine grained soils. These guidelines are outlined in the “Soil, Groundwater and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”, Ontario Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”), April 15, 2011, and hereinafter referred to as the “Table 2 Standards”;

5. Five (5) “worst case” soil samples were selected for chemical analysis from the borehole locations for petroleum hydrocarbons (“PHCs”) fractions 1 to 4 (F1-F4), volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) and metals;

6. Three (3) soil samples were selected for chemical analysis from the remaining shallow borehole locations for chemical analysis of metals;

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page ii

7. Two (2) soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of pH and one (1) soil sample for a grain size analysis.

8. Groundwater samples were collected on August 10, 2011, from monitoring wells BH312, BH314, BH316, BH317 and BH317. The groundwater samples were submitted for chemical analysis of PHC (F1-F4) and VOC parameters;

9. All measured concentrations in soil samples submitted for analysis satisfied the Table 2 Standards; and

10. All measured concentrations satisfied the Table 2 Standards in the groundwater samples analyzed.

Based on the findings of this Phase II ESA, it is Pinchin’s opinion that no further subsurface investigation is required at the Site in relation to the findings of the Phase I ESA.

This Executive Summary is subject to the same standard limitations as contained in the report and must be read in conjunction with the entire report.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0  INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 

1.1  SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................................................................. 3 

2.0  METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 4 

2.1  BOREHOLE INVESTIGATION .............................................................................................................................. 4 

2.2  MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION ................................................................................................................. 4 

2.3  GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ........................................................................ 5 

2.4  SAMPLING AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 5 

2.4.1  Soil .................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.2  Groundwater ..................................................................................................................................... 5 

2.5  QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROTOCOLS .................................................................................. 5 

2.6  ONTARIO WATER WELL RECORDS ................................................................................................................... 6 

2.7  SITE CONDITION STANDARDS .......................................................................................................................... 6 

3.0  RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................ 7 

3.1  SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 7 

3.2  SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND VAPOUR CONCENTRATIONS ........................................................................... 7 

3.3  ANALYTICAL .................................................................................................................................................... 8 

3.3.1  Soil .................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.3.2  Groundwater ..................................................................................................................................... 8 

4.0  FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 8 

5.0  DISCLAIMER .................................................................................................................................... 9 

6.0  SIGNATURE PAGE......................................................................................................................... 10 

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 2

APPENDICES

Appendix I Figures

Appendix II Borehole Logs

Appendix III Summary Tables

Appendix IV Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

FIGURES

Figure 1 Key Map

Figure 2 Borehole and Monitoring Well Location Plan

TABLES

Table 1 Groundwater Elevation Data

Table 2 Samples Submitted for Chemical Analysis

Table 3 pH and Grain Size Analysis for Soil

Table 4 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analysis for Soil

Table 5 Volatile Organic Compound Analysis for Soil

Table 6 Inorganic Analysis for Soil

Table 7 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analysis for Groundwater

Table 8 Volatile Organic Compound Analysis for Groundwater

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 3

1.0 Introduction

Pinchin Environmental Ltd. (“Pinchin”) was retained by Shad & Associates Inc. (“Shad”) on behalf of Royal Park Homes (“Client”) to conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) of the property located at 31 and 33 Milton Heights Crescent and 149 Tremaine Road, Milton, Ontario (hereafter referred to as the “Site”). The Site was developed with three (3) residential dwellings, a shed and a commercial building occupied by a trucking operation and offices (“Site Buildings”). The Site location is identified in Figure 1 of Appendix I.

The Phase II ESA was conducted by Pinchin at the request of Shad in relation to the potential acquisition and future redevelopment of the Site.

1.1 Scope of Work

All work completed under this project will be performed in general accordance with standard engineering practices and the following documents:

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) document entitled “Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario”, revised February 1997 (“MOE Sampling Guideline”);

Ontario Regulation 153/04 “Record of Site Condition” dated October 2004; and

Canadian Standards Association (“CSA”) publication entitled “Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, CSA Standard Z769-00 (reaffirmed 2004)”.

The scope of work for this Phase II ESA was outlined in the Pinchin proposal to Client dated July 26, 2011 and consisted of the following:

Advanced five (5) deep boreholes to a maximum depth of 6.1 metres below ground surface (“mbgs”) and three (3) shallow boreholes to a maximum depth of 5.2 mbgs. Each of the five (5) deep boreholes were completed as groundwater monitoring wells;

Field screened soil samples for the presence of petroleum/solvent-derived vapours using visual and olfactory considerations, along with a hydrocarbon vapour surveyor (“Gastech”) calibrated to hexane, and a photo-ionization detector (“PID”) calibrated to isobutylene;

Obtained one most-apparent “worst case” soil sample, based on the field screening methodologies, from each of the five (5) deep boreholes for chemical analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons (“PHCs”) fractions 1 through 4 (“F1-F4”), volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) and metals. One soil sample was obtained from each of the three (3) shallow boreholes for chemical analysis of metals;

Submitted one representative soil sample for grain size analysis and two (2) soil samples for laboratory analysis of pH in order to confirm the appropriate standards identified in the MOE document entitled “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” dated April 15, 2011 (“2011 MOE Standards”);

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 4

Conducted groundwater monitoring within the newly installed monitoring wells. Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells and submitted for laboratory analysis of PHCs and VOCs;

Evaluated the results of the soil and groundwater analyses by comparing the analytical results to the applicable 2011 MOE Standards; and

Prepared a factual report (this report) detailing the findings of the Phase II ESA and recommendations.

2.0 Methodology

2.1 Borehole Investigation

The investigation methodology was conducted in general accordance with the MOE Sampling Guideline and Ontario Regulation 153/04.

The Client retained Strong Soil Search Inc. to conduct the drilling activities at the Site. Pinchin supervised Strong Soil Search Inc. to advance eight (8) boreholes on August 8, 2011. Five (5) of the eight (8) boreholes were instrumented with monitoring wells to enable groundwater monitoring and sampling. The boreholes were advanced to depths ranging from 5.0 mbgs to 6.10 mbgs using a CME 55 truck mounted drill rig system.

Soil samples were collected at semi-continuous intervals using stainless steel split spoons. Discrete soil samples were collected from the split spoons and containerized in laboratory-supplied glass sampling jars. Subsurface soil conditions were logged on-Site by Pinchin personnel at the time of drilling. Soil samples were visually classified and were analyzed in the field for hydrocarbon derived vapour concentrations using the Gastech and PID.

The locations of the boreholes/monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2. A description of the subsurface stratigraphy encountered during the drilling program is documented in the borehole logs included in Appendix II.

2.2 Monitoring Well Installation

Groundwater monitoring wells were installed in boreholes BH312, BH314, BH316, BH317 and BH318 to enable groundwater monitoring and sampling.

The monitoring wells were constructed with 52 mm (2.0 inch) inner diameter (“ID”) flush-threaded schedule 40 PVC risers followed by a length of No. 10 slot PVC screen that attempted to traverse the water table. The screens were sealed using threaded caps and the riser was sealed at the surface with a lockable J-Plug cap. Silica sand was placed around and above the screened interval to form a filter pack around the well screen. A layer of bentonite was placed above the silica sand and was extended to ground surface. A protective steel above-grade casing was installed over the riser pipe and concreted in place at BH314, BH317 and BH318. No protective casings were available on Site to install at BH312 and BH316.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 5

2.3 Groundwater Monitoring and Development Program

On August 9, 2011, the groundwater monitoring wells were gauged for groundwater levels and the presence of non-aqueous phase liquids (“NAPL”) using a Solinst 121 Interface probe. The probe was cleaned with a solution of Alconox detergent and potable water prior to and after each measurement. The measured depths to groundwater are provided in Table 1.

Groundwater development was accomplished by utilizing a dedicated inertial pump (bailer) for each monitoring well to draw the groundwater sample(s) to the surface.

2.4 Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

2.4.1 Soil

Soil samples collected from the boreholes were field screened for hydrocarbon-derived vapour concentrations using the Gastech and PID. Organic vapour concentrations measured in the soil samples during the drilling investigation are presented on the borehole logs in Appendix II. One (1) most apparent “worst case” soil sample based on vapour concentrations, visual, and olfactory considerations was recovered from each of the boreholes and placed into laboratory-prepared sample bottles, and stored in coolers with ice. Selected samples were submitted to Maxxam Analytics Inc. (“Maxxam”) in Mississauga for laboratory analysis of metals, PHCs F1-F4, VOCs and metals. Formal chain of custody records were maintained between Pinchin and the staff at Maxxam.

A summary of the soil samples collected and submitted for laboratory analyses is presented in Table 2.

2.4.2 Groundwater

On August 10, 2011, groundwater samples were collected from the newly-installed groundwater monitoring wells. Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the monitoring wells were purged of three (3) to five (5) well casing volumes or till they went dry, in accordance with Pinchin’s standard field practices. The groundwater samples were placed into laboratory-prepared sample bottles and stored in coolers with ice. Groundwater samples were submitted to Maxxam for laboratory analysis of PHCs and VOCs. Formal chain of custody records were maintained between Pinchin and the staff at Maxxam.

A summary of the groundwater samples collected and submitted for laboratory analyses is presented in Table 2.

2.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Protocols

Quality assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) protocols were followed during the field program to ensure that representative samples were obtained. Field QA/QC protocols that were employed include:

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 6

Extraction of soil samples from the interior of the sampling device (where possible), rather than from areas in contact with the sampler walls to minimize the chance of cross-contamination. Split spoon sampling devices were cleaned with Alconox and potable water between sample collection;

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, the well was developed by purging three (3) to five (5) well casing volumes or till the borehole went dry. Upon completion of developing/purging activities, the wells were allowed sufficient time to recover prior to sampling;

Soil and groundwater samples collected were placed in laboratory-supplied glass sample jars;

Placement of all samples on ice immediately upon collection and appropriate temperatures maintained en route to the laboratory;

Use of dedicated and disposable nitrile gloves for all sample handling;

Sample collection and handling procedures were performed in general accordance with the MOE Sampling Guideline; and

Laboratory QA/QC consisted of lot replicate samples, surrogate recoveries and matrix blanks.

2.6 Ontario Water Well Records

The Ontario Water Resources Act, Ontario Regulation 903 (O.Reg. 903/128) requires all test holes greater than 3.0 mbgs have a water well record completed by a licensed well technician. The owner of the monitoring well must keep the water well record on file for a period of two years and the monitoring wells must be decommissioned as per O.Reg. 903/128 if monitoring wells are no longer in use. Strong Soil Search Inc. is a licensed well driller under O.Reg. 903/128.

2.7 Site Condition Standards

This Site is a residential/commercial property located within the Town of Milton. It is Pinchin’s understanding that drinking water for the Site and surrounding area is supplied by municipal services, with Lake Ontario and private wells serving as the water source. Native subsurface material underlying the fill material was observed to generally consist of sand and clay with some silt and trace sand overlying silt with some sand and trace clay to a maximum depth of 6.10 mbgs.

Two (2) representative soil samples were collected from the boreholes advanced at the Site and submitted for pH analysis. The MOE Standards indicate that a Site is classified as sensitive if the pH values of the surface soil (less than 1.5 mbgs) are less than 5 or greater than 9, and subsurface soils (greater than 1.5 mbgs) are less than 5 or greater than 11. Based on the analytical results, pH values of the subsurface soil do not indicate that the property is a “sensitive site”.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 7

One (1) representative soil sample was collected from a borehole advanced at the Site and submitted for 75 µm single-sieve grain size analysis. Based on the results of the analysis, the soil at the Site can be considered as fine textured for the purposes of the MOE Standards.

Therefore, based on the above information (as presented in Table 3), the appropriate Site Condition Standard is:

“Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” - “Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition”, dated April 15, 2011 (“Table 2 Standards”) for:

Fine-medium textured soils; and

Residential/Parkland/Institutional property use.

As such, all analytical results have been compared to these Table 2 Standards.

3.0 Results

3.1 Site Geology and Hydrogeology

Data collected during the borehole drilling program indicated that the soil stratigraphy at the Site was observed to generally consist of fill material (sand, sand and gravel) throughout the Site to depths ranging between 0.15 mbgs (BH316) and 0.76 mbgs (BH311, BH312, BH313, BH315 and BH317). The fill material was observed to overlay native soil of clay with some silt and trace sand overlying silt with some sand and trace clay to a maximum depth of 6.10 mbgs. A description of the subsurface stratigraphy encountered during borehole advancement is documented in the borehole logs.

Groundwater monitoring was conducted on August 9, 2011. No NAPL was detected in any of the wells at the time of monitoring.

The depth to groundwater measured within the monitoring wells ranged from 0.83 mbgs (BH314) and 2.08 mbgs (BH316).

The groundwater measurement data is presented in Table 1.

3.2 Subsurface Conditions and Vapour Concentrations

Soil vapour headspace concentrations measured in the soil samples collected during the verification soil sampling program are presented in the borehole logs in Appendix II. As noted, soil vapour headspace readings obtained from the Gastech ranged from 0 parts per million (“ppm”) to 15 ppm (BH315 between 4.57 and 5.03 mbgs). Soil vapour headspace readings from the PID ranged from 0 ppm to 2.5 ppm (BH317 between 1.52 and 2.13 mbgs also at BH318 between 4.57 and 5.18 mbgs).

No staining and/or odours were observed in soil samples collected during the investigation.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 8

3.3 Analytical

3.3.1 Soil

The summary of the soil analytical results of PHCs, VOCs and metals, along with the applicable Table 2 Standards are presented in Table 4 through Table 6.

As indicated in Table 4 through Table 6, all measured concentrations of PHCs, VOCs and metals in the collected soil samples were below the Table 2 Standards.

3.3.2 Groundwater

The summary of the groundwater analytical results of PHCs and VOCs, along with the applicable Table 2 Standards are presented in Table 7 and Table 8.

As indicated in Table 7 and Table 8, all measured concentrations of PHCs and VOCs in the groundwater samples were below the Table 2 Standards.

4.0 Findings and Conclusions

Based on the work completed as part of this Phase II ESA, the following conclusions are made:

Pinchin supervised the Client-retained drilling contractor (Strong Soil Search Inc.) to drill eight (8) boreholes. The boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 6.10 mbgs;

The soil stratigraphy at the Site generally consists of sand, sand and gravel to a maximum depth of 0.76 mbgs overlying clay with some silt and trace sand and generally followed by silt with some sand and trace clay to a maximum depth of 6.10 mbgs.

Groundwater monitoring was conducted on August 9, 2011 in the five (5) boreholes completed as monitoring wells. The depth to groundwater measured within monitoring wells ranged between 0.83 mbgs and 2.08 mbgs;

It was determined that the applicable Site Condition Standard for the Site is are the Table 2 Standards for:

o Fine to medium textured soils; and

o Residential/Parkland/Institutional property use.

All measured concentrations of PHCs, VOCs and metals in the soil samples collected were below the Table 2 Standards; and

All measured concentrations of PHCs and VOCs in the groundwater samples were below the Table 2 Standards.

Based on the findings of this Phase II ESA, it is Pinchin’s opinion that no further subsurface investigation is required at the Site.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 9

5.0 Disclaimer

This Phase II ESA was performed for Royal Park Homes in order to investigate potential environmental impacts at the Site. The term recognized environmental condition means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release, or a material threat of a release of a hazardous substance into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. This Phase II ESA does not quantify the extent of the current and/or recognized environmental condition or the cost of any remediation.

Conclusions derived are specific to the immediate area of study and cannot be extrapolated extensively away from sample locations. Samples have been analyzed for a limited number of contaminants that are expected to be present at the Site, and the absence of information relating to a specific contaminant does not indicate that it is not present.

No environmental site assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions on the property. Performance of this Phase II ESA to the standards established by Pinchin is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions on the property, and recognizes reasonable limits on time and cost.

This Phase II ESA was performed in general accordance with currently acceptable practices for environmental site investigations, specific Client requests, and the project budget, as applicable to this property.

Pinchin will not be responsible for any consequential or indirect damages. Pinchin will only be held liable for damages resulting from negligence of Pinchin. Pinchin will not be liable for any losses or damage if Client has failed, within a period of two (2) years following the date upon which the claim is discovered within the meaning of the Limitations Act, 2002 (Ontario), to commence legal proceedings against Pinchin to recover such losses or damage.

Pinchin makes no other representations whatsoever, including those concerning the legal significance of its findings, or as to other legal matters touched on in this report, including, but not limited to, ownership of any property, or the application of any law to the facts set forth herein. With respect to regulatory compliance issues, regulatory statutes are subject to interpretation and these interpretations may change over time.

Any use of this report by another party other than the Client, or any reliance on or decisions made based on the findings described in this report, are the sole responsibility of such parties, and Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages, suffered by any such party as a result of decisions made or actions conducted based on this report. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Furthermore, this report should not be construed as legal advice.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Royal Park Homes August 19, 2011 31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. And 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON Pinchin File: 69386

© 2011 Pinchin Environmental Ltd. Page 10

6.0 Signature Page

We trust that the foregoing information is satisfactory for your present requirements.

Should you have any questions about the report or require additional information, please contact the undersigned.

Yours truly,

PINCHIN ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.

per: Jason Laplante per: Sarah Ferguson Project Technologist Project Manager Environmental Due Diligence & Remediation

Environmental Due Diligence & Remediation

[email protected] [email protected]

per: Paul Loney, P. Eng Regional Client Manager Environmental Due Diligence & Remediation

[email protected] JL/SF/MM/db Z:\69000s\69386 Shad Milto Heights\Phase II ESA\Report\69386 PhaseII Milton (August 19, 2011).docx

APPENDIX I

FIGURES

PROJECT NAME

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT CLIENT NAME

ROYAL PARK HOMES C/O SHAD & ASSOCIATES INC. PROJECT LOCATION

31 & 33 MILTON HEIGHTS CRESCENT AND 149 TREMAINE ROAD, MILTON, ONTARIO

FIGURE NAME FIGURE NO.

1

KEY MAP SCALE PROJECT NO. DATE:

AS SHOWN 69386 AUG. 2011

© SGA LTD.

APPENDIX II

BOREHOLE LOGS

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

-1ft m

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31169386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSandBrown, some silt, trace clay, damp.

ClayBrown mottled grey, some silt, trace sand,damp.

Brown.

End of Borehole

0.000.00

0.76

5.18

No

mon

itorin

g w

ell i

nsta

lled.

1

2

3

4

5

6

50

75

75

60

50

50

12

25

26

58

26

23

BH311-1

BH311-2

BH311-3

BH311-4

BH311-5

BH311-6

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

metals

pH

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

NA

NA

NA

1 of 1

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

-1ft m

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31269386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSand GravelLight brown, some silt, trace clay, damp.

ClayDark brown mottled grey, some silt, trace sand, damp.

Dark brown.

SiltDark grey, some sand, trace clay, wet.

End of Borehole

0.000.00

0.76

3.05

5.18

Sili

ca S

and

Ben

toni

te

Ris

erS

cree

n

1

2

3

4

5

6

50

75

50

100

80

80

42

9

28

48

59

23

BH312-1

BH312-2

BH312-3

BH312-4

BH312-5

BH312-6

0.7/0

0.8/0

1.2/0

1.0/5

1.2/0

0.7/0

PHCsVOCsmetals

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

51 mm

NA

NA

1 of 1

Groundwater level at 1.56 mbgs as measured on August 9, 2011.

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

-1ft m

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31369386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSandDark brown, some clay, trace silt, damp (Fill to 0.76 mbgs).Brown, some silt, trace clay, damp.

SiltDark grey, some sand, trace clay, wet.

End of Borehole

0.000.00

2.29

5.03

No

mon

itorin

g w

ell i

nsta

lled.

1

2

3

4

5

6

75

75

50

75

75

50

11

17

22

62

27

23

BH313-1

BH313-2

BH313-3

BH313-4

BH313-5

BH313-6

NA

0.3/0

1.5/0

1.9/0

1.9/0

NA

grainsize

metals

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

NA

NA

NA

1 of 1

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

-1ft m

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31469386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSandBrown, some silt, trace clay, damp.

ClayDark brown mottled grey, some silt and sand, damp

SiltDark grey, some sand, trace clay, wet

End of Borehole

0.000.00

0.46

2.44

5.18

Sili

ca S

and

Ben

toni

teRis

erS

cree

n

1

2

3

4

5

6

100

50

75

50

0

50

10

12

48

25

27

23

BH314-1

BH314-2

BH314-3

BH314-4

BH314-5

BH314-6

1.9/5

2.1/0

1.7/0

1.5/0

NA

1.4/0

PHCsVOCsmetals

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

51 mm

NA

NA

1 of 1

Groundwater level at 0.83 mbgs as measured on August 9, 2011.

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

-1ft m

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31569386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSandDark brown, some clay, trace silt and gravel, damp (Fill to 0.76 mbgs).Brown, some silt, trace clay, damp.

SiltDark grey, some sand, trace clay, wet.

End of Borehole

0.000.00

3.05

5.03

No

mon

itorin

g w

ell i

nsta

lled.

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

50

50

50

50

50

15

26

36

26

34

18

BH315-1

BH315-2

BH315-3

BH315-4

BH315-5

BH315-6

NA

0.6/0

0.1/0

0.7/0

0.9/0

1.2/15

metals

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

NA

NA

NA

1 of 1

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

0 0ft m

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31669386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSandBlack, some gravel, trace clay and silt, damp.

ClayDark brown mottled grey, some gravel and silt, trace sand, moist.

Dark brown.

SiltDark grey, some sand, trace clay, wet

End of Borehole

0.00

3.66

6.10

Sili

ca S

and

Ben

toni

teRis

erS

cree

n

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

80

50

60

60

40

80

75

47

34

40

56

50

48

28

BH316-1

BH316-2

BH316-3

BH316-4

BH316-5

BH316-6

BH316-7

2.1/0

1.7/0

1.4/0

1.3/0

1.6/0

1.2/5

0.6/0

pH

PHCsVOCsmetals

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

51 mm

NA

NA

1 of 1

Groundwater level at 2.08 mbgs as measured on August 9, 2011.

Log of Borehole:Project #:

Project:

Client:

Location:

Drill Date:

Logged By:

Project Manager:

Contractor:

Hamilton, ON L8S 4R9

875 Main Street West, Unit 11

Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Drilling Method:

Well Casing Size:

Top of Casing Elevation:

Grade Elevation:

Sheet: 1 of 1

SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE

Dep

th

-1ft m

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th (

m)

Mon

itorin

g W

ell D

etai

ls

Sam

pler

#

Re

cove

ry (

%)

N-V

alue

Sam

ple

ID

Soi

l Vap

our

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Gas

tech

/PID

Labo

rato

ry

Ana

lysi

s

BH31769386

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Royal Park Homes

31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, ON

August 8, 2011

JWL

SJF

Ground SurfaceSandBrown, some silt, trace clay, moist (Fill to 0.76 mbgs).

Brown mottled grey.

Brown.

SiltDark grey, some sand, trace clay, wet.

End of Borehole

0.000.00

4.11

5.18

Sili

ca S

and

Ben

toni

te

Ris

erS

cree

n

1

2

3

4

5

6

80

75

75

75

20

80

12

31

30

62

47

26

BH317-1

BH317-2

BH317-3

BH317-4

BH317-5

BH317-6

1.9/0

0.8/0

2.5/0

0.7/0

2.2/0

1.5/5

PHCsVOCsmetals

Strong Soil Sampling

Solid Stem

51 mm

NA

NA

1 of 1

Groundwater level at 1.39 mbgs as measured on August 9, 2011.

APPENDIX III

SUMMARY TABLES

NAPL Level Measurement

from TOC

Water Level Measurement From Grade

Product Thickness

Calculated Water Level

Elevation(m) (m) (m) (mREL)

09/08/2011 ND 1.56 ND NM09/08/2011 ND 0.83 ND NM09/08/2011 ND 2.08 ND NM09/08/2011 ND 1.39 ND NM09/08/2011 ND 1.73 ND NM

Notes:mREL Indicates Groundwater Elevation (metres) Relative To Site BenchmarkNAPL Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid

ND Not DetectedNM Not Monitored

TOC Indicates Top of Casing

TABLE 1GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

BH316

BH318

BH314

Well Number Date (dd/mm/yyyy)BH312

BH317

Pinchin File: 69386

Borehole ID Sample ID P

HC

s (F

1-F

4)

VO

Cs

Met

als

pH Gra

in S

ize

Ana

lysi

s

PH

Cs

(F1-

F4)

VO

Cs

BH311 BH311-3 ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH311-5 ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH312 BH312-4 ● ● ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH400-4 Field Duplicate of BH312-

4● ● ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH312 ● ● To Assess Groundwater Quality

BH313 BH313-3 ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH313-4 ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH314 BH314-2 ● ● ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH314 ● ● To Assess Groundwater Quality

BH315 BH315-4 ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH316 BH316-1 ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH316-6 ● ● ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH316 ● ● To Assess Groundwater Quality

BH317 BH317-3 ● ● ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH317 ● ● To Assess Groundwater Quality

BH318 BH318-6 ● ● ● To Assess Soil Quality.

BH318 ● ● To Assess Groundwater Quality

BH401 Field Duplicate of BH318 ● ● To Assess Groundwater Quality

Notes:

PHCs (F1-F4) Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fraction 1 to Fraction 4)BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and XylenesVOCs Volatile Organic Compounds

NA

Sample Depth Range (m)

Parameters

Rationale

1.52 - 2.13

4.57 - 5.18

1.52 - 2.13

3.05 - 3.66

NA

0.76 - 1.37

2.29 - 2.90

NA

NA

TABLE 2SAMPLES SUBMITTED FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSES

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

GR

OU

ND

WA

TE

R S

AM

PL

ES

SO

IL S

AM

PL

ES

2.29 - 2.90

NA

Samples

2.29 - 2.90

NA

2.29 - 3.51

0 - 0.61

4.57 - 5.18

1.52 - 2.13

Pinchin File: 69386

BH311-5 BH313-3 BH316-18/8/2011 8/8/2011 8/8/2011

3.05 - 3.66 1.52 - 2.13 0 - 0.61Sub-Surface Sub-Surface Surface

Surface: 5 < pH < 9Subsurface: 5 < pH < 11

% 50% NA 85 NA% 50% NA 15 NA

FINENotes:

2011 Table 2 Standards*

BOLD Environmentally Sensititive Area (Based Upon pH of Surface Soil)BOLD Environmentally Sensititive Area (Based Upon pH of Sub-Surface Soil)

NA Not Analysedmbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

Grain Size

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 2 Standards, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use for medium and fine textured soils.

Sieve #200 <0.075 mmSieve #200 >0.075 mm

TABLE 3pH AND GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES FOR SOIL

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

pH NA

Parameter Units2011 Table 2 Standards*

Sample DesignationSample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

Sample Depth (mbgs)

7.97 8.25

Pinchin File: 69386

BH312-4

BH400-4 Field Duplicate of

BH312-4 BH314-2 BH316-6 BH317-3 BH318-608/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/20112.29 - 2.90 2.29 - 2.90 0.76 - 1.37 4.57 - 5.18 1.52 - 2.13 4.57 - 5.18

0.02 0.17 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.02 6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.02 1.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.04 25 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.0410 65 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1010 150 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1010 1300 13 11 19 85 <10 <10

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 (>C34-C50) 10 5600 <10 <10 <10 14 <10 <10Notes:

2011 Table 2 Standards*

BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardRDL Reportable Detection Limit

BOLD RDL Exceeds Site Condition StandardUnits All Units in μg/g Unless Otherwise Noted.mbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

TABLE 4PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSES FOR SOIL

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1 (C6 - C10)

Sample DesignationSample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

Sample Depth (mbgs)

Parameter

BenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal Xylenes

RDL2011 Table 2 Standards*

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 2 Standards, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use for medium and fine textured soils.

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 (>C16 - C34)Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 (>C10 - C16)

Pinchin File: 69386

BH312-4

BH400-4 Field Duplicate of

BH312-4 BH314-2 BH316-6 BH317-3 BH318-608/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/20112.29 - 2.90 2.29 - 2.90 0.76 - 1.37 4.57 - 5.18 1.52 - 2.13 4.57 - 5.18

0.5 28 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.02 0.17 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.05 1.9 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.26 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 2.7 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.17 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 2.9 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 1.7 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.097 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05 25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 2.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.75 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.085 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.03 0.081 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.030.04 0.081 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.040.02 1.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Hexane 0.05 34 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.5 44 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

0.05 0.96 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.5 4.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

0.05 1.4 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 2.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.02 6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.05 2.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 3.4 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.05 0.52 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 5.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.02 0.022 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.02 25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Notes:

2011 Table 2 Standards*

BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardRDL Reportable Detection Limit

BOLD RDL Exceeds Site Condition StandardNV No Value Available for Site Condition StandardNA Not Analysed

Units All Units in μg/g Unless Otherwise Noted.mbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 2Standards, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, for Residential/Parkland/InstitutionaProperty Use for medium and fine textured soils.

Bromoform

Sample Depth (mbgs)

TABLE 5VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYSES FOR SOIL

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

RDL2011 Table 2 Standards*

Parameter

Sample DesignationSample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethane

Bromomethane

Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Carbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroformDibromochloromethane1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-Dichlorobenzene

1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-DichloroethyleneCis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-DichloropropaneCis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneEthylene Dibromide

Methyl Ethyl KetoneMethylene ChlorideMethyl Isobutyl KetoneMethyl-t-Butyl EtherStyrene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

Vinyl ChlorideTotal Xylenes

TolueneTetrachloroethylene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethylene

Pinchin File: 69386

BH311-3 BH312-4Lab Duplicate of

BH312-4

BH400-4 Field Duplicate of

BH312-4 BH313-4Lab Duplicate of

BH313-4 BH314-2 BH315-4 BH316-6 BH317-3 BH318-608/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/20111.52 - 2.13 2.29 - 2.90 2.29 - 2.90 2.29 - 2.90 2.29 - 2.90 2.29 - 2.90 0.76 - 1.37 2.29 - 3.51 4.57 - 5.18 1.52 - 2.13 4.57 - 5.18

0.2 7.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NA <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.21 18 6 6 6 5 2 NA 4 6 4 6 2

0.5 390 98 85 91 70 21 NA 29 64 34 92 200.2 5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 <0.2 NA <0.2 0.4 0.2 0.8 <0.25 120 6 <5 <5 5 <5 NA <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Boron - Hot Water Extractable 0.05 1.5 0.12 0.23 NA 0.19 0.1 NA 0.92 0.15 0.28 0.5 0.110.1 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 NA 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.11 160 20 18 20 18 8 NA 7 17 15 24 7

Chromium VI 0.2 10 <0.2 <0.2 NA <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 22 13 9.9 10 10 3.7 NA 4.6 9.9 7.5 13 3.50.5 180 30 26 27 27 14 NA 23 25 24 35 151 120 11 10 10 10 4 NA 10 8 6 25 3

Mercury 0.05 1.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NA <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.050.5 6.9 <0.5 1.3 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 NA 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.5 130 26 20 22 21 7.3 NA 7.6 19 15 28 6.70.5 2.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.2 25 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NA <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.05 1 0.1 0.07 0.08 0.08 <0.05 NA 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.11 <0.05Uranium 0.05 23 0.89 0.51 0.53 0.53 0.5 NA 0.32 0.63 0.49 0.51 0.41

5 86 26 23 24 23 16 NA 13 23 20 32 145 340 64 58 59 55 21 NA 52 49 40 120 20

Notes:

2011 Table 2 Standards*

BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardRDL Reportable Detection Limit

BOLD RDL Exceeds Site Condition StandardNA Not Analysed

Units All Units in μg/g Unless Otherwise Noted.mbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

TABLE 6INORGANIC ANALYSES FOR SOIL

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

Vanadium

AntimonyArsenicBariumBeryllium

MolybdenumNickel

Thallium

Lead

Silver

Parameter RDL2011 Table 2 Standards*

Sample DesignationSample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

Sample Depth (mbgs)

Boron - Acid Extractable

Zinc

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 2Standards, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, for Residential/Parkland/InstitutionaProperty Use for medium and fine textured soils.

Copper

Selenium

CadmiumChromium (Total)

Cobalt

Pinchin File: 69386

BH312 BH314 BH316 BH317 BH318

BH401 Field Duplicate of

BH318

10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011

0.1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 24 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 2.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 300 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1 (C6 - C10) 25 750 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25100 150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100100 500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100100 500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

Notes:

2011 Table 2 Standards*

BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardRDL Reportable Detection Limit

BOLD RDL Exceeds Site Condition StandardUnits All Units in μg/L Unless Otherwise Noted.mbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

Toluene

Sample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 2 Standards, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, for All Types of Property Use, for medium and fine textured soils.

EthylbenzeneTotal Xylenes

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 (>C34 - C50)

Benzene

Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 (>C10 - C16)Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 (>C16 - C34)

TABLE 7PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSES FOR GROUNDWATER

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

Sample Designation

RDL2011 Table 2 Standards*

Parameter

Pinchin File: 69386

BH312 BH314 BH316 BH317 BH318

BH401 Field Duplicate of

BH318 Trip Blank

10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/2011 10/8/201110 2700 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <100.1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 16 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 25 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.5 0.89 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 30 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 22 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 25 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 59 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.5 590 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 14 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 17 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 17 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 NV <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 NV <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 2.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Hexane 0.5 520 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.55 1800 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

0.5 50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.55 640 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

0.2 15 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 5.4 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 1.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 24 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 17 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 200 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.2 150 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 1.7 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.1 300 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 300 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 300 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Notes:

2011 Table 2 Standards*

BOLD Exceeds Site Condition StandardRDL Reportable Detection Limit

BOLD RDL Exceeds Site Condition StandardUnits All Units in μg/L Unless Otherwise Noted.mbgs Metres Below Ground Surface

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011, Table 2 Standards, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, for All Types of Property Use, for medium and fine textured soils.

m-Xylene & p-Xyleneo-Xylene

Sample DesignationSample Collection Date (dd/mm/yyyy)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-Dichlorobenzene

ChlorobenzeneChloroform

Bromoform

Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene1,2-Dichloropropane

1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene

TABLE 8VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYSES FOR GROUNDWATER

Royal Park Homes31 & 33 Milton Heights Cr. and 149 Tremaine Rd., Milton, Ontario

Bromodichloromethane

AcetoneBenzene

RDL2011 Table 2 Standards*

Parameter

Vinyl Chloride

Total Xylenes

BromomethaneCarbon Tetrachloride

1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethylene

EthylbenzeneEthylene Dibromide

Dibromochloromethane

Styrene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

Methyl Isobutyl KetoneMethyl-t-Butyl Ether

Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Methyl Ethyl KetoneMethylene Chloride

Toluene

Pinchin File: 69386

APPENDIX IV

LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS

Your Project #: 69386 Your C.O.C. #: 27398302, 273983-02-01

Attention: Sarah FergusonPinchin Environmental LtdUnit 11875 Main St WHamilton, ONL8S 4R9

Report Date: 2011/08/17

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B1B9052Received: 2011/08/08, 18:28

Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 12

Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceHot Water Extractable Boron 9 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 CAM SOP-00408 R153 Ana. Prot. 2004Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2011/08/12 CAM SOP-00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC ( 1 ) 5 N/A 2011/08/17 CAM SOP-00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 6 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 CAM SOP-00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil 6 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 CAM SOP-00316 CCME CWS Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS 9 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 CAM SOP-00447 EPA 6020 Moisture 6 N/A 2011/08/11 CAM SOP-00445 McKeague 2nd ed 1978Moisture 3 N/A 2011/08/12 CAM SOP-00445 McKeague 2nd ed 1978pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 2 2011/08/11 2011/08/11 CAM SOP-00413 SM 4500 H Sieve, 75um ( 2 ) 1 N/A 2011/08/15 CAM SOP-00467 Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil 6 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 CAM SOP-00226 EPA 8260 modified

Remarks:

Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for AnalyticalMethods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologiescomply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in thisanalysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol forAnalytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.

The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method andperformance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent followingthe 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation isavailable upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method:(i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2-F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds isconsidered to be the date sampled.

Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04.Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no otherwarranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as

Page 1 of 24

Your Project #: 69386 Your C.O.C. #: 27398302, 273983-02-01

Attention: Sarah FergusonPinchin Environmental LtdUnit 11875 Main St WHamilton, ONL8S 4R9

Report Date: 2011/08/17

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS-2-

per contract.

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified.(2) The Sieve test has been validated in accordance with ISO Guide 17025 requirements. SCC accreditation pending.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

IVANA VUKOVIC, Env Project ManagerEmail: [email protected]# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 2

Page 2 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 METALS PACKAGE (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 1 K L 6 1 2 2 K L 6 1 2 3 K L 6 1 2 3 K L 6 1 2 4Sampling Date 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH316-6 QC Batch BH314-2 BH312-4 BH312-4 BH318-6 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Inorganics

Chromium (VI) ug/g ND 2580457 ND ND ND 0.2 2579104

Metals

Hot Water Ext. Boron (B) ug/g 0.28 2581116 0.92 0.23 0.11 0.05 2581116

Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) ug/g 4 2581907 4 6 6 2 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) ug/g 34 2581907 29 85 91 20 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) ug/g 0.2 2581907 ND 0.4 0.4 ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Boron (B) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND ND 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) ug/g ND 2581907 0.1 0.1 0.1 ND 0.1 2581907

Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) ug/g 15 2581907 7 18 20 7 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) ug/g 7.5 2581907 4.6 9.9 10 3.5 0.1 2581907

Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) ug/g 24 2581907 23 26 27 15 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) ug/g 6 2581907 10 10 10 3 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) ug/g ND 2581907 0.5 1.3 0.6 ND 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) ug/g 15 2581907 7.6 20 22 6.7 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND ND 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl) ug/g 0.06 2581907 0.06 0.07 0.08 ND 0.05 2581907

Acid Extractable Uranium (U) ug/g 0.49 2581907 0.32 0.51 0.53 0.41 0.05 2581907

Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) ug/g 20 2581907 13 23 24 14 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) ug/g 40 2581907 52 58 59 20 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND ND 0.05 2581907

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 METALS PACKAGE (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 5 K L 6 1 2 6 K L 6 1 2 8 K L 6 1 2 9 K L 6 1 2 9Sampling Date 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH317-3 QC Batch BH400-4 BH315-4 BH313-4 BH313-4 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Inorganics

Chromium (VI) ug/g ND 2579104 ND ND ND ND 0.2 2580457

Moisture % 14 16 1 2580814

Metals

Hot Water Ext. Boron (B) ug/g 0.50 2581116 0.19 0.15 0.10 0.05 2581116

Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) ug/g 6 2581907 5 6 2 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) ug/g 92 2581907 70 64 21 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) ug/g 0.8 2581907 0.4 0.4 ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Boron (B) ug/g ND 2581907 5 ND ND 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) ug/g 0.2 2581907 ND ND ND 0.1 2581907

Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) ug/g 24 2581907 18 17 8 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) ug/g 13 2581907 10 9.9 3.7 0.1 2581907

Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) ug/g 35 2581907 27 25 14 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) ug/g 25 2581907 10 8 4 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) ug/g ND 2581907 ND 0.6 ND 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) ug/g 28 2581907 21 19 7.3 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl) ug/g 0.11 2581907 0.08 0.07 ND 0.05 2581907

Acid Extractable Uranium (U) ug/g 0.51 2581907 0.53 0.63 0.50 0.05 2581907

Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) ug/g 32 2581907 23 23 16 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) ug/g 120 2581907 55 49 21 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) ug/g ND 2581907 ND ND ND 0.05 2581907

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 METALS PACKAGE (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 3 0Sampling Date 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH311-3 RDL QC Batch

Inorganics

Chromium (VI) ug/g ND 0.2 2580457

Moisture % 12 1 2581137

Metals

Hot Water Ext. Boron (B) ug/g 0.12 0.05 2581116

Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) ug/g ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) ug/g 6 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) ug/g 98 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) ug/g 0.5 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Boron (B) ug/g 6 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) ug/g 0.1 0.1 2581907

Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) ug/g 20 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) ug/g 13 0.1 2581907

Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) ug/g 30 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) ug/g 11 1 2581907

Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) ug/g ND 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) ug/g 26 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) ug/g ND 0.5 2581907

Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) ug/g ND 0.2 2581907

Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl) ug/g 0.10 0.05 2581907

Acid Extractable Uranium (U) ug/g 0.89 0.05 2581907

Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) ug/g 26 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) ug/g 64 5 2581907

Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) ug/g ND 0.05 2581907

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 1 K L 6 1 2 2 K L 6 1 2 3 K L 6 1 2 4 K L 6 1 2 5 K L 6 1 2 6Sampling Date 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH316-6 BH314-2 BH312-4 BH318-6 BH317-3 BH400-4 RDL QC Batch

Inorganics

Moisture % 15 14 10 17 14 10 1 2579675

BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons

F1 (C6-C10) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 2576931

F1 (C6-C10) - BTEX ug/g ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 2576931

F2-F4 Hydrocarbons

F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 2577205

F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) ug/g 85 19 13 ND ND 11 10 2577205

F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) ug/g 14 ND ND ND ND ND 10 2577205

Reached Baseline at C50 ug/g Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2577205

Surrogate Recovery (%)

1,4-Difluorobenzene % 103 104 105 103 105 105 2576931

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 99 100 101 100 99 99 2576931

D10-Ethylbenzene % 90 99 97 96 95 99 2576931

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 100 102 101 101 102 102 2576931

o-Terphenyl % 103 103 103 101 101 104 2577205

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 6 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 VOLATILE ORGANICS (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 1 K L 6 1 2 2 K L 6 1 2 3 K L 6 1 2 4 K L 6 1 2 5Sampling Date 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH316-6 BH314-2 BH312-4 BH318-6 BH317-3 RDL QC Batch

Volatile Organics

Acetone (2-Propanone) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577168

Benzene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

Bromodichloromethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Bromoform ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Bromomethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Chlorobenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Chloroform ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Dibromochloromethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.03 2577168

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.04 2577168

Ethylbenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

Ethylene Dibromide ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Hexane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577168

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577168

Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Styrene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Tetrachloroethylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 7 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 VOLATILE ORGANICS (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 1 K L 6 1 2 2 K L 6 1 2 3 K L 6 1 2 4 K L 6 1 2 5Sampling Date 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH316-6 BH314-2 BH312-4 BH318-6 BH317-3 RDL QC Batch

Toluene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Trichloroethylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Vinyl Chloride ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

p+m-Xylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

o-Xylene ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

Xylene (Total) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2577168

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 2577168

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 94 96 98 96 97 2577168

D10-o-Xylene % 104 104 102 105 110 2577168

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 96 96 94 96 97 2577168

D8-Toluene % 101 101 100 100 101 2577168

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 8 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 VOLATILE ORGANICS (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 6Sampling Date 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH400-4 RDL QC Batch

Volatile Organics

Acetone (2-Propanone) ug/g ND 0.5 2577168

Benzene ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

Bromodichloromethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Bromoform ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Bromomethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Chlorobenzene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Chloroform ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Dibromochloromethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/g ND 0.03 2577168

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/g ND 0.04 2577168

Ethylbenzene ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

Ethylene Dibromide ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Hexane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ug/g ND 0.5 2577168

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ug/g ND 0.5 2577168

Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Styrene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Tetrachloroethylene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 9 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

O'REG 153 VOLATILE ORGANICS (SOIL)

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 6Sampling Date 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH400-4 RDL QC Batch

Toluene ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Trichloroethylene ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Vinyl Chloride ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

p+m-Xylene ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

o-Xylene ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

Xylene (Total) ug/g ND 0.02 2577168

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/g ND 0.05 2577168

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 96 2577168

D10-o-Xylene % 108 2577168

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 96 2577168

D8-Toluene % 100 2577168

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 10 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SOIL

Maxxam ID K L 6 1 2 7 K L 6 1 3 1 K L 6 1 3 2Sampling Date 2011/08/08 2011/08/08 2011/08/08COC Number 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 273983-02-01 U n i t s BH316-1 BH311-5 BH313-3 QC Batch

Inorganics

Available (CaCl2) pH pH 8.25 7.97 2578530

Miscellaneous Parameters

Grain Size % FINE 2581569

Sieve - #200 (<0.075mm) % 85 2581569

Sieve - #200 (>0.075mm) % 15 2581569

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 11 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID KL6121 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH316-6 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2580457 N/A 2011/08/17 LUSINE KHACHATRYANPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 2576931 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 DAN CAOPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil GC/FID 2577205 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 YANG YUAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2579675 N/A 2011/08/11 GAURAV KALIAVolatile Organic Compounds in Soil P&T/MS 2577168 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 DANIEL KIM

Maxxam ID KL6122 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH314-2 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2579104 N/A 2011/08/12 SALLY COUGHLINPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 2576931 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 DAN CAOPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil GC/FID 2577205 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 YANG YUAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2579675 N/A 2011/08/11 GAURAV KALIAVolatile Organic Compounds in Soil P&T/MS 2577168 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 DANIEL KIM

Maxxam ID KL6123 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH312-4 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2579104 N/A 2011/08/12 SALLY COUGHLINPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 2576931 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 DAN CAOPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil GC/FID 2577205 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 YANG YUAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2579675 N/A 2011/08/11 GAURAV KALIAVolatile Organic Compounds in Soil P&T/MS 2577168 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 DANIEL KIM

Maxxam ID KL6123 D u p Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH312-4 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERI

Page 12 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID KL6124 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH318-6 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2579104 N/A 2011/08/12 SALLY COUGHLINPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 2576931 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 DAN CAOPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil GC/FID 2577205 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 YANG YUAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2579675 N/A 2011/08/11 GAURAV KALIAVolatile Organic Compounds in Soil P&T/MS 2577168 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 DANIEL KIM

Maxxam ID KL6125 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH317-3 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2579104 N/A 2011/08/12 SALLY COUGHLINPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 2576931 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 DAN CAOPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil GC/FID 2577205 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 YANG YUAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2579675 N/A 2011/08/11 GAURAV KALIAVolatile Organic Compounds in Soil P&T/MS 2577168 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 DANIEL KIM

Maxxam ID KL6126 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH400-4 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2580457 N/A 2011/08/17 LUSINE KHACHATRYANPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 2576931 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 DAN CAOPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil GC/FID 2577205 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 YANG YUAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2579675 N/A 2011/08/11 GAURAV KALIAVolatile Organic Compounds in Soil P&T/MS 2577168 2011/08/10 2011/08/12 DANIEL KIM

Maxxam ID KL6127 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH316-1 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystpH CaCl2 EXTRACT 2578530 2011/08/11 2011/08/11 XUANHONG QIU

Page 13 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID KL6128 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH315-4 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2580457 N/A 2011/08/17 LUSINE KHACHATRYANAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2580814 N/A 2011/08/12 GAURAV KALIA

Maxxam ID KL6129 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH313-4 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2580457 N/A 2011/08/17 LUSINE KHACHATRYANAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2580814 N/A 2011/08/12 GAURAV KALIA

Maxxam ID KL6129 D u p Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH313-4 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2580457 N/A 2011/08/17 LUSINE KHACHATRYAN

Maxxam ID KL6130 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH311-3 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystHot Water Extractable Boron ICP 2581116 2011/08/12 2011/08/16 AZITA FAZAELIHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 2580457 N/A 2011/08/17 LUSINE KHACHATRYANAcid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 2581907 2011/08/15 2011/08/15 VIVIANA CANZONIERIMoisture BAL 2581137 N/A 2011/08/12 GAURAV KALIA

Maxxam ID KL6131 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH311-5 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystpH CaCl2 EXTRACT 2578530 2011/08/11 2011/08/11 XUANHONG QIU

Maxxam ID KL6132 Collected 2011/08/08Sample ID BH313-3 Shipped

Matrix Soil Received 2011/08/08

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystSieve, 75um PSIV 2581569 N/A 2011/08/15 GAURAV KALIA

Page 14 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1B9052 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/17

Sampler Initials: JL

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 15 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance ReportMaxxam Job Number: MB1B9052

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2576931 DCA Matrix Spike 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2011/08/10 95 % 60 - 1404-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/10 105 % 60 - 140D10-Ethylbenzene 2011/08/10 112 % 30 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/10 101 % 60 - 140F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/10 NC % 60 - 140

Spiked Blank 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2011/08/10 104 % 60 - 1404-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/10 100 % 60 - 140D10-Ethylbenzene 2011/08/10 93 % 30 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/10 104 % 60 - 140F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/10 93 % 60 - 140

Method Blank 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2011/08/10 108 % 60 - 1404-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/10 97 % 60 - 140D10-Ethylbenzene 2011/08/10 92 % 30 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/10 102 % 60 - 140F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/10 ND, RDL=10 ug/gF1 (C6-C10) - BTEX 2011/08/10 ND, RDL=10 ug/g

RPD F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/10 NC % 50F1 (C6-C10) - BTEX 2011/08/10 NC % 50

2577168 DKI Matrix Spike 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140D10-o-Xylene 2011/08/11 116 % 50 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 83 % 60 - 140D8-Toluene 2011/08/11 103 % 60 - 140Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 79 % 60 - 140Benzene 2011/08/11 96 % 60 - 140Bromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 88 % 60 - 140Bromoform 2011/08/11 96 % 60 - 140Bromomethane 2011/08/11 92 % 60 - 140Carbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 140Chlorobenzene 2011/08/11 98 % 60 - 140Chloroform 2011/08/11 93 % 60 - 140Dibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 95 % 60 - 1401,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 1401,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 105 % 60 - 1401,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 107 % 60 - 140Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 87 % 60 - 1401,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 96 % 60 - 1401,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 83 % 60 - 1401,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 99 % 60 - 140cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 94 % 60 - 140trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 1401,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 92 % 60 - 140cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 92 % 60 - 140trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 89 % 60 - 140Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 107 % 60 - 140Ethylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 94 % 60 - 140Hexane 2011/08/11 105 % 60 - 140Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 88 % 60 - 140Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 79 % 60 - 140Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 76 % 60 - 140Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 87 % 60 - 140Styrene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 1401,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 98 % 60 - 1401,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 84 % 60 - 140Tetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 109 % 60 - 140Toluene 2011/08/11 103 % 60 - 140

Page 16 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1B9052

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577168 DKI Matrix Spike 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 99 % 60 - 1401,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 92 % 60 - 140Trichloroethylene 2011/08/11 104 % 60 - 140Vinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 97 % 60 - 140p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 105 % 60 - 140o-Xylene 2011/08/11 98 % 60 - 140Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 95 % 60 - 140

Spiked Blank 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 102 % 60 - 140D10-o-Xylene 2011/08/11 106 % 50 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 88 % 60 - 140D8-Toluene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 89 % 60 - 140Benzene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140Bromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 95 % 60 - 140Bromoform 2011/08/11 102 % 60 - 140Bromomethane 2011/08/11 95 % 60 - 140Carbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 140Chlorobenzene 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 140Chloroform 2011/08/11 99 % 60 - 140Dibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 1401,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 1401,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 1401,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 103 % 60 - 140Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 89 % 60 - 1401,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 1401,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 92 % 60 - 1401,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 99 % 60 - 140trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 102 % 60 - 1401,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 98 % 60 - 140cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 98 % 60 - 140trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 93 % 60 - 140Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 107 % 60 - 140Ethylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140Hexane 2011/08/11 103 % 60 - 140Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 94 % 60 - 140Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 90 % 60 - 140Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 86 % 60 - 140Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 98 % 60 - 140Styrene 2011/08/11 103 % 60 - 1401,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 102 % 60 - 1401,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 92 % 60 - 140Tetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 104 % 60 - 140Toluene 2011/08/11 102 % 60 - 1401,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 1401,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 97 % 60 - 140Trichloroethylene 2011/08/11 105 % 60 - 140Vinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 97 % 60 - 140p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 104 % 60 - 140o-Xylene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 95 % 60 - 140

Method Blank 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 140D10-o-Xylene 2011/08/11 110 % 50 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 81 % 60 - 140D8-Toluene 2011/08/11 104 % 60 - 140

Page 17 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1B9052

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577168 DKI Method Blank Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gBenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/gBromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gBromoform 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gBromomethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gCarbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gChlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gChloroform 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gDibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gDichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.03 ug/gtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.04 ug/gEthylbenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/gEthylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gHexane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gMethylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gMethyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gMethyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gStyrene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gTetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gToluene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/g1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gTrichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gVinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/gp+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/go-Xylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/gXylene (Total) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/gTrichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g

RPD 1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 50Ethylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 NC % 50Hexane 2011/08/11 NC % 50Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 NC % 50

2577205 YY Matrix Spike o-Terphenyl 2011/08/12 105 % 30 - 130F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 93 % 60 - 130F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 94 % 60 - 130F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 103 % 60 - 130

Spiked Blank o-Terphenyl 2011/08/12 99 % 30 - 130F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 86 % 60 - 130F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 86 % 60 - 130F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 93 % 60 - 130

Method Blank o-Terphenyl 2011/08/12 102 % 30 - 130F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 ND, RDL=10 ug/g

Page 18 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1B9052

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577205 YY Method Blank F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 ND, RDL=10 ug/gF4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 ND, RDL=10 ug/g

RPD F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 NC % 50F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 NC % 50F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/12 NC % 50

2579104 SAC Matrix Spike Chromium (VI) 2011/08/12 107 % 75 - 125QC Standard Chromium (VI) 2011/08/12 124 % 75 - 125Spiked Blank Chromium (VI) 2011/08/12 107 % 80 - 120Method Blank Chromium (VI) 2011/08/12 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/gRPD Chromium (VI) 2011/08/12 NC % 25

2579675 VTH RPD Moisture 2011/08/11 2.8 % 202580457 LKH Matrix Spike

[KL6129-01] Chromium (VI) 2011/08/17 94 % 75 - 125QC Standard Chromium (VI) 2011/08/17 96 % 75 - 125Spiked Blank Chromium (VI) 2011/08/17 89 % 80 - 120Method Blank Chromium (VI) 2011/08/17 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/gRPD [ K L 6 1 2 9 - 0 1 ] Chromium (VI) 2011/08/17 NC % 25

2580814 BOP RPD Moisture 2011/08/12 1.0 % 202581116 AFZ QC Standard Hot Water Ext. Boron (B) 2011/08/16 101 % 85 - 115

Method Blank Hot Water Ext. Boron (B) 2011/08/16 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g2581137 BOP RPD Moisture 2011/08/12 6.5 % 202581569 LKA QC Standard Sieve - #200 (<0.075mm) 2011/08/15 89 % 86 - 91

Sieve - #200 (>0.075mm) 2011/08/15 11 % 9 - 14RPD Sieve - #200 (<0.075mm) 2011/08/15 0.3 % 20

Sieve - #200 (>0.075mm) 2011/08/15 0.6 % 202581907 VIV Matrix Spike

[KL6123-02] Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2011/08/15 102 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2011/08/15 100 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2011/08/15 NC % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2011/08/15 103 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2011/08/15 90 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2011/08/15 106 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2011/08/15 107 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2011/08/15 99 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2011/08/15 NC % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2011/08/15 106 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2011/08/15 99 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2011/08/15 103 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2011/08/15 100 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2011/08/15 101 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl) 2011/08/15 103 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2011/08/15 115 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2011/08/15 108 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2011/08/15 NC % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2011/08/15 110 % 75 - 125

QC Standard Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2011/08/15 100 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2011/08/15 94 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2011/08/15 92 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2011/08/15 91 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2011/08/15 87 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2011/08/15 100 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2011/08/15 98 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2011/08/15 94 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2011/08/15 97 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2011/08/15 102 % 75 - 125

Page 19 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1B9052

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2581907 VIV QC Standard Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2011/08/15 93 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2011/08/15 92 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2011/08/15 92 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2011/08/15 95 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl) 2011/08/15 102 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2011/08/15 108 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2011/08/15 99 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2011/08/15 102 % 75 - 125Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2011/08/15 104 % 75 - 125

Method Blank Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/gAcid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=1 ug/gAcid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gAcid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/gAcid Extractable Boron (B) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=5 ug/gAcid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/gAcid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=1 ug/gAcid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/gAcid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gAcid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=1 ug/gAcid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gAcid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gAcid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/gAcid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/gAcid Extractable Thallium (Tl) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gAcid Extractable Uranium (U) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/gAcid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=5 ug/gAcid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=5 ug/gAcid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2011/08/15 ND, RDL=0.05 ug/g

RPD [ K L 6 1 2 3 - 0 2 ] Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2011/08/15 2.0 % 35Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2011/08/15 7.0 % 35Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2011/08/15 7.6 % 35Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2011/08/15 5.2 % 35Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2011/08/15 1.3 % 35Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2011/08/15 0.3 % 35Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2011/08/15 8.1 % 35Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2011/08/15 4.2 % 25Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2011/08/15 NC % 35Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2011/08/15 2.0 % 35Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2011/08/15 NC % 35

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.QC Standard: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency.NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and thespiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation.

Page 20 of 24

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1B9052

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit areliable calculation.

Page 21 of 24

Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B1B9052

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

CRISTINA CARRIERE, Scientific Services

EWA PRANJIC, M.Sc., C.Chem, Scientific Specialist

JEEVARAJ JEEVARATRNAM, Senior Analyst

SUZANA POPOVIC, Supervisor, Hydrocarbons

====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 22 of 24

Page 23 of 24

Page 24 of 24

Your Project #: 69386 Your C.O.C. #: 27398303, 273983-03-01

Attention: Sarah FergusonPinchin Environmental LtdUnit 11875 Main St WHamilton, ONL8S 4R9

Report Date: 2011/08/12

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B1C0119Received: 2011/08/10, 10:30

Sample Matrix: Water# Samples Received: 7

Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferencePetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Water 7 N/A 2011/08/12 CAM SOP-00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water 6 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 CAM SOP-00316 CCME Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds in Water 7 N/A 2011/08/11 CAM SOP-00226 EPA 8260 modified

Remarks:

Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for AnalyticalMethods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologiescomply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in thisanalysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol forAnalytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.

The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method andperformance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent followingthe 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation isavailable upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method:(i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2-F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds isconsidered to be the date sampled.

Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04.Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no otherwarranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or asper contract.

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

../2

Page 1 of 18

Your Project #: 69386 Your C.O.C. #: 27398303, 273983-03-01

Attention: Sarah FergusonPinchin Environmental LtdUnit 11875 Main St WHamilton, ONL8S 4R9

Report Date: 2011/08/12

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS-2-

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

IVANA VUKOVIC, Env Project ManagerEmail: [email protected]# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 2

Page 2 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID K M 1 4 1 8 K M 1 4 1 9 K M 1 4 2 0 K M 1 4 2 1 K M 1 4 2 2Sampling Date 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10COC Number 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 U n i t s BH312 BH314 BH316 BH317 BH318 RDL QC Batch

Volatile Organics

Acetone (2-Propanone) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 10 2577614

Benzene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Bromoform ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Bromomethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577614

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Chlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Chloroform ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577614

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Ethylbenzene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Ethylene Dibromide ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Hexane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577614

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 2577614

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 5 2577614

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 5 2577614

Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Styrene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Tetrachloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID K M 1 4 1 8 K M 1 4 1 9 K M 1 4 2 0 K M 1 4 2 1 K M 1 4 2 2Sampling Date 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10COC Number 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 U n i t s BH312 BH314 BH316 BH317 BH318 RDL QC Batch

Toluene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Trichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Vinyl Chloride ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

p+m-Xylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

o-Xylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Xylene (Total) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 2577614

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0.2 2577614

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 94 93 94 93 95 2577614

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 109 107 109 108 110 2577614

D8-Toluene % 98 99 97 99 97 2577614

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID K M 1 4 2 3 K M 1 4 2 4Sampling Date 2011/08/10 2011/08/10COC Number 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 U n i t s BH401 TRIP BLANK RDL QC Batch

Volatile Organics

Acetone (2-Propanone) ug/L ND ND 10 2577614

Benzene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Bromoform ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Bromomethane ug/L ND ND 0.5 2577614

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Chlorobenzene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Chloroform ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) ug/L ND ND 0.5 2577614

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Ethylbenzene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Ethylene Dibromide ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Hexane ug/L ND ND 0.5 2577614

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/L ND ND 0.5 2577614

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ug/L ND ND 5 2577614

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ug/L ND ND 5 2577614

Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Styrene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Tetrachloroethylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID K M 1 4 2 3 K M 1 4 2 4Sampling Date 2011/08/10 2011/08/10COC Number 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 U n i t s BH401 TRIP BLANK RDL QC Batch

Toluene ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Trichloroethylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Vinyl Chloride ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

p+m-Xylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

o-Xylene ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Xylene (Total) ug/L ND ND 0.1 2577614

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/L ND ND 0.2 2577614

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 95 92 2577614

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 107 104 2577614

D8-Toluene % 99 97 2577614

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 6 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (CCME)

Maxxam ID K M 1 4 1 8 K M 1 4 1 9 K M 1 4 2 0 K M 1 4 2 1 K M 1 4 2 2 K M 1 4 2 3Sampling Date 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10 2011/08/10COC Number 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 273983-03-01 U n i t s BH312 BH314 BH316 BH317 BH318 BH401 RDL QC Batch

BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons

F1 (C6-C10) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND ND 25 2578101

F1 (C6-C10) - BTEX ug/L ND ND ND ND ND ND 25 2578101

F2-F4 Hydrocarbons

F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND ND 100 2577935

F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND ND 100 2577935

F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) ug/L ND ND ND ND ND ND 100 2577935

Reached Baseline at C50 ug/L Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2577935

Surrogate Recovery (%)

1,4-Difluorobenzene % 90 91 92 89 91 96 2578101

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 103 103 104 101 101 108 2578101

D10-Ethylbenzene % 109 109 112 117 102 117 2578101

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 92 96 94 91 94 99 2578101

o-Terphenyl % 105 106 102 103 106 102 2577935

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 7 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (CCME)

Maxxam ID K M 1 4 2 4Sampling Date 2011/08/10COC Number 273983-03-01 U n i t s TRIP BLANK RDL QC Batch

BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons

Benzene ug/L ND 0.20 2578101

Toluene ug/L ND 0.20 2578101

Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 0.20 2578101

o-Xylene ug/L ND 0.20 2578101

p+m-Xylene ug/L ND 0.40 2578101

Total Xylenes ug/L ND 0.40 2578101

F1 (C6-C10) ug/L ND 25 2578101

F1 (C6-C10) - BTEX ug/L ND 25 2578101

Surrogate Recovery (%)

1,4-Difluorobenzene % 92 2578101

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 105 2578101

D10-Ethylbenzene % 107 2578101

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 95 2578101

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 8 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID KM1418 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID BH312 Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water GC/FID 2577935 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 RAVINDER GAIDHUVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Maxxam ID KM1419 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID BH314 Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water GC/FID 2577935 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 RAVINDER GAIDHUVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Maxxam ID KM1420 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID BH316 Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water GC/FID 2577935 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 RAVINDER GAIDHUVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Maxxam ID KM1421 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID BH317 Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water GC/FID 2577935 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 RAVINDER GAIDHUVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Maxxam ID KM1422 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID BH318 Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water GC/FID 2577935 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 RAVINDER GAIDHUVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Page 9 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID KM1423 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID BH401 Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIPetroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water GC/FID 2577935 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 RAVINDER GAIDHUVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Maxxam ID KM1424 Collected 2011/08/10Sample ID TRIP BLANK Shipped

Matrix Water Received 2011/08/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed AnalystPetroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 2578101 N/A 2011/08/12 SIMON XIVolatile Organic Compounds in Water P&T/MS 2577614 N/A 2011/08/11 SERENA LENTZ

Page 10 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdMaxxam Job #: B1C0119 Client Project #: 69386Report Date: 2011/08/12

Sampler Initials: JL

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 11 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance ReportMaxxam Job Number: MB1C0119

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577614 SLE Matrix Spike 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 99 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 130Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 74 % 60 - 140Benzene 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 94 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2011/08/11 114 % 60 - 140Carbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 107 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 130Chloroform 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 99 % 70 - 130Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 1401,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 91 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 91 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 92 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 106 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 130Hexane 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 87 % 70 - 130Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 77 % 70 - 130Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 76 % 60 - 140Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 78 % 70 - 130Styrene 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 1301,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 87 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 101 % 70 - 130Toluene 2011/08/11 101 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 89 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 107 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 100 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 102 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 130Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 101 % 60 - 140Benzene 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2011/08/11 111 % 60 - 140Carbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 130Chloroform 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 130

Page 12 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1C0119

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577614 SLE Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 98 % 70 - 130Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 96 % 60 - 1401,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 99 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 91 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 91 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 92 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 100 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 101 % 70 - 130Hexane 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 88 % 70 - 130Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 84 % 70 - 130Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 90 % 60 - 140Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 84 % 70 - 130Styrene 2011/08/11 106 % 70 - 1301,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 92 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 99 % 70 - 130Toluene 2011/08/11 99 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 94 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2011/08/11 96 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 94 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130

Method Blank 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 92 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 107 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=10 ug/LBenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LBromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LBromoform 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/LBromomethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/LCarbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LChlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LChloroform 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LDibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/LDichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/L1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/L1,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L

Page 13 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1C0119

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577614 SLE Method Blank Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LEthylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/LHexane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/LMethylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.5 ug/LMethyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=5 ug/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=5 ug/LMethyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/LStyrene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/LTetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LToluene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/LTrichloroethylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LVinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/Lp+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/Lo-Xylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LXylene (Total) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.1 ug/LTrichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/L

RPD Acetone (2-Propanone) 2011/08/11 NC % 30Benzene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Bromodichloromethane 2011/08/11 NC % 30Bromoform 2011/08/11 NC % 30Bromomethane 2011/08/11 NC % 30Carbon Tetrachloride 2011/08/11 NC % 30Chlorobenzene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Chloroform 2011/08/11 NC % 30Dibromochloromethane 2011/08/11 NC % 301,2-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 NC % 301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 NC % 301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12) 2011/08/11 NC % 301,1-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 301,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 301,1-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 NC % 30cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 NC % 30trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2011/08/11 NC % 301,2-Dichloropropane 2011/08/11 NC % 30cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 NC % 30trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Ethylene Dibromide 2011/08/11 NC % 30Hexane 2011/08/11 NC % 30Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2011/08/11 NC % 30Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 2011/08/11 NC % 30Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 2011/08/11 3.4 % 30Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 2011/08/11 NC % 30Styrene 2011/08/11 NC % 301,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 30Tetrachloroethylene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Toluene 2011/08/11 NC % 301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2011/08/11 NC % 30

Page 14 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1C0119

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2577614 SLE RPD Trichloroethylene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Vinyl Chloride 2011/08/11 NC % 30p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 NC % 30o-Xylene 2011/08/11 NC % 30Xylene (Total) 2011/08/11 NC % 30Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2011/08/11 NC % 30

2577935 RGA Matrix Spike o-Terphenyl 2011/08/11 105 % 30 - 130F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 86 % 60 - 130F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 102 % 60 - 130F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 108 % 60 - 130

Spiked Blank o-Terphenyl 2011/08/11 104 % 30 - 130F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 85 % 60 - 130F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 100 % 60 - 130F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 105 % 60 - 130

Method Blank o-Terphenyl 2011/08/11 102 % 30 - 130F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=100 ug/LF3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=100 ug/LF4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=100 ug/L

RPD F2 (C10-C16 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 NC % 50F3 (C16-C34 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 NC % 50F4 (C34-C50 Hydrocarbons) 2011/08/11 NC % 50

2578101 JXI Matrix Spike 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2011/08/11 89 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 100 % 70 - 130D10-Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 102 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 90 % 70 - 130Benzene 2011/08/11 87 % 70 - 130Toluene 2011/08/11 97 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 101 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2011/08/11 93 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 71 % 70 - 130F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/11 83 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2011/08/11 95 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 103 % 70 - 130D10-Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 92 % 70 - 130Benzene 2011/08/11 86 % 70 - 130Toluene 2011/08/11 101 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 101 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2011/08/11 104 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 102 % 70 - 130F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/11 84 % 70 - 130

Method Blank 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2011/08/11 93 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2011/08/11 102 % 70 - 130D10-Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 105 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2011/08/11 91 % 70 - 130Benzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/LToluene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/LEthylbenzene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/Lo-Xylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/Lp+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug/LTotal Xylenes 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug/LF1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=25 ug/LF1 (C6-C10) - BTEX 2011/08/11 ND, RDL=25 ug/L

RPD Benzene 2011/08/11 NC % 40Toluene 2011/08/11 NC % 40

Page 15 of 18

Pinchin Environmental LtdAttention: Sarah Ferguson Client Project #: 69386P.O. #: Site Location:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: MB1C0119

QA/QC DateBatch AnalyzedNum Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits

2578101 JXI RPD Ethylbenzene 2011/08/11 NC % 40o-Xylene 2011/08/11 NC % 40p+m-Xylene 2011/08/11 NC % 40Total Xylenes 2011/08/11 NC % 40F1 (C6-C10) 2011/08/11 NC % 40F1 (C6-C10) - BTEX 2011/08/11 NC % 40

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency.NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit areliable calculation.

Page 16 of 18

Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B1C0119

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

ABDI MOHAMUD, Senior Analyst

CRISTINA CARRIERE, Scientific Services

JEEVARAJ JEEVARATRNAM, Senior Analyst

====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 17 of 18

Page 18 of 18