pfmea-240-099-m02e-glx-r0- to be reviewed against the top cover

8/4/2019 PFMEA-240-099-M02E-GLX-R0- To Be Reviewed Against the Top Cover

1/3

Poten

Failure Mode and (Process

Customer :- Kaynes Technologies

Customer Part No.:- 240-099-M02E Process Responsibility : Mohan

Customer Part Name:- COSMETIC COVER BOTTOM Key Date :

Core Team : Purushothaman, Mohan, Zameer, Joshi

1.1.1. Customer drawing not clear 1.1.1.1. Asking for so

customer drawing

1.1.2. Incomplete data 1.1.2.1. Asking for co

confirming correct re

and complete data

SC

2.1.1. Changes in revision number 2.1.1.1.Counter chec

development drawing

whether all the data r2.1.2. Missing dimensions while doing

development drawing

2.1.2.1. Checking De

customer dwg and m

dimensions are prop

1.1.1. Handling 1.1.1.1. Incoming ma

done & verified with m

certificate

1.1.2.1. Enough mea

avoid scratches durin

1.1.2.2. Purchasing a

from supplier (approv

2.1.1.1. Incoming ma


certificate2.1.1.2. Purchasing a




certificate





certificate





certificate





certificate





certificate



1.1.1. Incorrect development drawings.1.1.1.1. Drawings are

giving to the operatio

1.1.2. Programming error(human error)1.1.2.1. Trained oper

instructionsLaser Cutting 1. Program error

1.1. Rejection / Rework .

6

6.1.1. Improper post-process

precautions by the supplier

5.1.1. Manufacturing process of the

supplier

6.1. Rejection 7

1.1. Bad finish of product

2.1. Rework / Rejection

2.2. Dimension and angle

variation

Potential Causes /

Mechanisms of Failure

Curr

Desi

Contr

Preven

Potential Failure

Mode

Potential Effects of

Failure

Severity

1.1. Rework or rejection of the

product

2.1. Rework or rejection of theproduct

6

6

Process / Function

Class

2. Bend

(twist,straightness)

3. Material Hardness

4. Chemical composition

5. Sheet thickness

Variation

6. Rust

Part Drawings

1. Errors in original

drawing

2. Errors in developmentdrawing

SC

3

5 SC 2.1.1. manufacturing process ofsupplier

1.1.2. Packing & transportation

5 SC2.2.1. manufacturing process of

supplier

3.1 Dimension and angle

variation4

3.1.1. Manufacturing process of the

supplier

4.1. Rejection 44.1.1. Manufacturing process of the

supplier


product5 SC

Raw Material Inspection

1. Scratches


2/3

Potential Causes /


Cur

Des

Con

Preve

Potential Failure

Mode


Failure

Sev

erity

Process / Function

Cla

ss

1.2. Wastage of man power

and machine hours.

1.2.1. Programming error(human error)1.2.1.1. Trained ope

instructions

1.1. Rejection / rework 1.1.1. Unskilled operators 1.1.1.1. Skilled ope

1.2. dimension variation 1.2.1. Unskilled operators 1.2.1.1. Trained ope

instructions

1.3. Poor appearance of the

component

1.3.1. Rough handling of the

component,while deburring

1.3.1.1.Following be

deburring

1. Reverse Bending 1.1. Rejection / Rework

7 1.1.1. Improper study / check of

drawing

1.1.1.1. Studying th

bending

2. Dimension variation 2.1. Rejection / Rework 4 2.1.1. Improper bending tool selection

2.1.1.1. Use proper

analyse the type of before the process

3.1.1. Improper levelling of the sheet

3.1.1.1. Using Prop

punch for various th

3.1.2. Improper bending tool selection

3.1.2.1. Use proper

analyse the type of

before the process

1. Wrong alignment


product

6

1.1.1. Human error

1.1.1.1. Skilled labo

2. In/out in geometrical

dimensions of child parts 1.2. Reject/Rework

6 1.1.2. Mistakes during pre-assembly

processes

1.1.2.1. Make sure

coming for the inspe

and OK

1.1.1.1. Demoisturis

clean cloth materialair

1.1.1.2. Using clean

the work before pow

1.1.2. Improper degreasing1.1.2.1. Using prope

reagents

2. Vary in thickness 2.1. Rejection / Rework 7 2.1.1. Less/excess number of passes

2.1.1.1. Determining

passes required to

and following it

3. Color variation 3.1. Rejection / Rework 43.1.1. Improper combination of color

agents/Improper proportions

. . . .

according to the cus

color, and inspectin

4. Scratches, finger prints 4.1. Rework

4 4.1.1. Improper handling, tight holding

on bare hands

4.1.1.1. Handling ca

gloves to avoid fing

5.1.1.1. Controling a

parameter

5.1.1.2. Using well d

1.1.1. Instrument error 1.1.1.1. Calibrated i

for measurement

1.1.2. Drg not referred correctly

1.1.2.1. Customer d

sampling plan refer

inspection

2. Inspection not done asper customer

specification / sampling

plan

2.1. Customer rejection 62.1.1. Customer spec/sampling plan not

referred

2.1.1.1. Referring ccopy and using bub

inspect critical dime

1.1. Damage during transit /

handling

1.1.1. Packing not done as per part

requirement

1.1.1.1. Packing do

requirement

1.2. Customer rejection 1.2.1. Part identification not done1.2.1.1. Attching pa

on the shipment

5. Blisters 5.1. Rework 4 5.1.1. Lump formation

POWDER COATING

1. Coating Peel off1.1. Rework or rejection of the

product7

1.1.1. Poor adhesion

Bending

3. Taper Bending/Angle

Variation3.1. Rejection / Rework 4

Deburring1. Improper filing of

material3

FINAL

INSPECTION/VISUAL

1. Wrong measurement 1.1. Delay in despatch 6

PACKING 1. Inadquate packing 7

ASSEMBLY


3/3

Potential Causes /


Current

Design

Controls

Prevention

Potential Failure

Mode


Failure

Sev

erity

Process / Function

Cla

ss

1.1.1.1. Good supervision

1.1.1.2. Provide sufficient packing

the parts

DESPATCH 1. Transportation error 1.1. Damage 7 1.1.1. Rough handling / bad transit

3 of 3

pfmea-240-099-m02e-glx-r0- to be reviewed against the top cover

Documents