perceptions of power and influence within the salinas
TRANSCRIPT
Perceptions of Power and Influence within the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Jon Detka, Justin Luong, Nazanin RezaeiEnvironmental Studies In Practice (ENVS 201B) - Spring 2018
Overview
Sustainable Groundwater Governance
Our Research
Major Findings
Key Take-Away
Groundwater Governance
VvThe process by which groundwVater resources a re managed through the application of responsibility, participation, information availability, transparency, custom, and rule of law.
Coordinating administrative actions and decision-making between and among different jurisdictional levels (local, regional, state) (Saunier and Meganck 2007)
1. Identify multiple perspectives regarding the importance of SVBGSA in groundwater governance.
2. Explore the context of power and influence in groundwater management.
3. Examine the role different stakeholders have in influencing groundwater governance for “disadvantaged communities”.
Research Focus
Continued overdrafting of groundwater aquifers
Long history of groundwater extraction Salinas Valley
○ 80% Ag , 20% Urban
The challenge
○ Sustain high agricultural production levels
○ Increase access to clean water for DACs
History
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)
GSA
GSP
2014
Disadvantaged Communities (DACs)
Communities designated by census-tract data with median household of $50K
Concern over true spatial representation of marginalized groups
Certain DACs have not had clean water in 30+ years in the Salinas Valley Basin
Groundwater Governance Structure
Method1 hour In-person / phone
17 interview questions
5 critical factors
Efficacy & Fairness in GSAKiparsky et al. 2016
City of Salinas - Local Stakeholders
Gary Peterson SVBGSA - General Manager
Janet Brennan SVBGSA - Env Board Seat
Bruce Delgado CCCRWQCB / Marina GSA
Adam Secondo SVBGSA - Ag Board Seat
Brenda Granillo SVBGSA - Utility Board Seat
Horacio Amezquita SVBGSA - Advisory Committee Member
Am
ount
of I
nflu
ence
Support for Sustainable Groundwater Practices
SJHCAm
ount
of I
nflu
ence
Support for Sustainable Groundwater Practices
EJCW
SVBGSA
1. Identify patterns - aggregated response map
2. Review audio - Influence and support
3. Relate influence to critical governance factors
Data Analysis
Common Themes Representation & Participation Agriculture is not monolithicAgricultural, Influence, and the Salinas Valley GSADisadvantaged communities adequately represented
ScaleWater Quantity is the highest priority
FundingSuccessful GSA needs tax/fee levying ability
Human CapacityGary has been instrumental in facilitating cooperation in the SVBGSA
Agriculture is not monolithic
● Farmers support sustainable groundwater practicesIssues regarding surface water qualityLittle discussion about groundwater quality / quantityEmphasis on rights to water in reservoirs North County vs South CountyNorth County grows more veggies while South County grows more wine grapes○ What’s more important and what should water be
directed to?
Agricultural, Influence, and the Salinas Valley GSA
Agriculture is the driving economic force in the Salinas Valley4 AG Board Seats, Public Board Member perceived to always vote with AG, many other seats supported the super-majorityHeavily focused on sustainable water quantityDo not think that nitrates from fertilizers affect groundwater issuesAg always has to pay for legacy environmental issuesDifficulty in holding individuals responsibleNitrate changes aren’t visible for 50 years
Water Quantity not Quality
A focus on water quality is a focus on sustainability
Supply and rate of extraction in groundwater reservoir is contendedTaking out the Arundo from the river should basically balance the basinWater quality and quantity are tied Water quality “Do no harm” policy“The future of water is reclaimed water”
DACs have adequate representation
Disadvantaged Communities are
Represented
GSA is not responsible for
DACs
Represented via Interests of Other Board Members
DACs have adequate representation
Disadvantaged Communities are
Represented
GSA is not responsible for
DACs
Represented via Interests of Other Board Members
DAC Board Seat is Representative
California Regulated Public Utility
Commision Board Seat
Agricultural Board Seats
Do DACs have adequate representation?
Disadvantaged Communities are
Represented
GSA is not responsible for
DACs
Represented via Interests of Other Board Members
DAC Board Seat is Representative
California Regulated Public Utility
Commision Board Seat
Agricultural Board Seats
Adequate Spatial Representation?
Balancing Profit and Labor
Influence of Agriculture and DACs
Influence of Agriculture and DACs
DACs have adequate representation
Human Right to Water has not been brought up (AB 685, 2013)
The board is aware of it and does not need to be reminded
Ultimately if there is a water shortage people will get water first
Key Points
Are Disadvantaged Communities adequately represented due to the perceived low influence? Potential Avoidance of Responsibility
Conclusions
GSAs ideally positioned to provide equitable representation and promote sustainable groundwater initiatives.
Find consensus on role of GSA in water quality.
Sustaining GSA programs will require funding.
AcknowledgementsSVBGSA - Gary PetersonHoracio Amezquita - San Jerardo Housing CooperativeJanet Brennan - Monterey Co. LandwatchBruce Delgado - CCCRWQCB / Marina MayorAdam Secondo - Secondo Family FarmsBrenda Granillo - Cal WaterEJCW - Environmental Justice Coalition for WaterEric Tyn - CastrovilleEveryone else that provides support to water infrastructure and governance!Our Course Instructors ENVS 201B Cohort And…. WATER