people vs agui

1
People of the Philippines vs Marilyn Aguilar G.R. No. 191396 17 April 2013 (Leonardo-De Castro, J.) Doctrine: Facts: Two separate informations were filed against Marilyn Aguilar for violating Republic Act No.9165, otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drug Act of 2002”. In the first information, Aguilar, without have in possession, custody and control of .31 gram of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) while in the second, sell and deliver to another .45 gram of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu). Aguilar pleaded not guilty of both charges during arraignment. Aguilar and her counsel admitted the genuineness and the execution of the letter request for drug test, initial laboratory report, request for laboratory examination and photocopy of the marked money in evidence and admitted Aguilar’s identity as the one arrested by the police officers. Issue: Are the Trial Court and the Court of Appeals right in giving credence to the version of the Prosecution? Held:

Upload: mjpjore

Post on 12-Jan-2016

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

fyj,

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: People vs Agui

People of the Philippines vs Marilyn Aguilar G.R. No. 191396 17 April 2013(Leonardo-De Castro, J.)

Doctrine:

Facts:Two separate informations were filed against Marilyn Aguilar for violating Republic Act No.9165, otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drug Act of 2002”. In the first information, Aguilar, without have in possession, custody and control of .31 gram of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) while in the second, sell and deliver to another .45 gram of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu). Aguilar pleaded not guilty of both charges during arraignment. Aguilar and her counsel admitted the genuineness and the execution of the letter request for drug test, initial laboratory report, request for laboratory examination and photocopy of the marked money in evidence and admitted Aguilar’s identity as the one arrested by the police officers.

Issue:Are the Trial Court and the Court of Appeals right in giving credence to the version of the Prosecution?

Held: