pedagogies of engagement – cooperative learning and problem-based learning karl a. smith...

48
Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem- Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota [email protected] http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith STEP Project Workshop Louisiana State University College of Engineering May 2010

Upload: chloe-lewis

Post on 28-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning

Karl A. SmithEngineering Education – Purdue UniversityCivil Engineering - University of Minnesota

[email protected]://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith

STEP Project WorkshopLouisiana State University

College of Engineering

May 2010

Page 2: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

2

Session Agenda• Review/Introduce Cooperative Learning

(CL)

• Key concepts of CL

• Approaches for implementing CL

Page 3: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

3

Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom

• Informal Cooperative Learning Groups

• Formal Cooperative Learning Groups

• Cooperative Base Groups

See Cooperative Learning Handout (CL College-804.doc)

Page 4: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Cooperative Learning is instruction that involves people working in teams to accomplish a common goal, under conditions that involve both positive interdependence (all members must cooperate to complete the task) and individual and group accountability (each member is accountable for the complete final outcome).

Key Concepts

•Positive Interdependence•Individual and Group Accountability•Face-to-Face Promotive Interaction•Teamwork Skills•Group Processing

Page 5: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

5

Individual & Group Accountability

• ?

Page 6: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

6

http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith/docs/Smith-CL%20Handout%2008.pdf

Page 7: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

7

Book Ends on a Class Session

Page 8: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Book Ends on a Class Session

1. Advance Organizer2. Formulate-Share-Listen-Create (Turn-

to-your-neighbor) -- repeated every 10-12 minutes

3. Session Summary (Minute Paper)1. What was the most useful or meaningful thing you

learned during this session?2. What question(s) remain uppermost in your mind as we

end this session?3. What was the “muddiest” point in this session?

Page 9: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

9

Advance Organizer“The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. Ascertain this and teach him accordingly.”

David Ausubel - Educational psychology: A cognitive approach, 1968.

Page 10: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

10

Quick Thinks

•Reorder the steps•Paraphrase the idea•Correct the error•Support a statement•Select the response

Johnston, S. & Cooper,J. 1997. Quick thinks: Active- thinking in lecture classes and televised instruction. Cooperative learning and college teaching, 8(1), 2-7.

Page 11: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

11

Formulate-Share-Listen-Create

Informal Cooperative Learning GroupIntroductory Pair Discussion of a

FOCUS QUESTION

1. Formulate your response to the question individually

2. Share your answer with a partner3. Listen carefully to your partner's answer4. Work together to Create a new answer

through discussion

Page 12: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

12

Formulate-Share-Listen-Create (Think-Pair-Share)

• Individually read the quote “To teach is to engage students in learning. . .”

• Underline/Highlight words and/or phrases that stand out for you

• Turn to the person next to you and talk about words and/or phrases that stood out

Page 13: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

To teach is to engage students in learning; thus teaching consists of getting students involved in the active construction of knowledge. . .The aim of teaching is not only to transmit information, but also to transform students from passive recipients of other people's knowledge into active constructors of their own and others' knowledge. . .Teaching is fundamentally about creating the pedagogical, social, and ethical conditions under which students agree to take charge of their own learning, individually and collectively

Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Edited by C. Roland Christensen, David A. Garvin, and Ann Sweet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School, 1991.

Page 14: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

14

Minute Paper• What was the most useful or meaningful thing

you learned during this session?• What question(s) remain uppermost in your

mind as we end this session?• What was the “muddiest” point in this session?• Give an example or application• Explain in your own words . . .

Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Page 15: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

15

Session Summary(Minute Paper)

Reflect on the session:

1. Most interesting, valuable, useful thing you learned.

2. Things that helped you learn.

3. Question, comments, suggestions.

4. Pace: Too slow 1 . . . . 5 Too fast5. Relevance: Little 1 . . . 5 Lots6. Instructional Format: Ugh 1 . . . 5 Ah

Page 16: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

16

Q4 – Pace: Too slow 1 . . . . 5 Too fast (3.0)Q5 – Relevance: Little 1 . . . 5 Lots (3.9)Q6 – Format: Ugh 1 . . . 5 Ah (4.1)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Q4 Q5 Q6

1

2

3

4

5

MOT 8221 – Spring 2010 – Session 1 (1/29/10)

Page 17: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

17

Q4 – Pace: Too slow 1 . . . . 5 Too fast (3.3)Q5 – Relevance: Little 1 . . . 5 Lots (4.2)Q6 – Format: Ugh 1 . . . 5 Ah (4.4)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Q4 Q5 Q6

1

2

3

4

5

MOT 8221 – Spring 2009 – Session 1

Page 18: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

18

Informal CL (Book Ends on a Class Session) with Concept Tests

Physics Peer InstructionEric Mazur - Harvard – http://galileo.harvard.edu

Peer Instruction – www.prenhall.comRichard Hake – http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/

Chemistry Chemistry ConcepTests - UW Madison

www.chem.wisc.edu/~conceptVideo: Making Lectures Interactive with ConcepTests

ModularChem Consortium – http://mc2.cchem.berkeley.edu/

STEMTECVideo: How Change Happens: Breaking the “Teach as You Were Taught” Cycle – Films for the Humanities & Sciences – www.films.com

HarvardThinking Together & From Questions to Concepts Interactive Teaching in Physics: Derek Bok Center – www.fas.harvard.edu/~bok_cen/

Page 19: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

19

The “Hake” Plot of FCI

Pretest (Percent)

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00

ALS

SDI

WP

PI(HU)

ASU(nc)

ASU(c)

HU

WP*

UMn Traditional

XUMn Cooperative Groups

XUMn-CL+PS

Page 20: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Richard Hake (Interactive engagement vs traditional methods) http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/

Traditional (lecture)

Interactive (active/cooperative)

<g> = Concept Inventory Gain/Total

Page 21: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

21

Page 22: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

22

Physics (Mechanics) Concepts:The Force Concept Inventory (FCI)

• A 30 item multiple choice test to probe student's understanding of basic concepts in mechanics.

• The choice of topics is based on careful thought about what the fundamental issues and concepts are in Newtonian dynamics.

• Uses common speech rather than cueing specific physics principles.

• The distractors (wrong answers) are based on students' common inferences.

Page 23: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Strategies for Energizing Large

Classes: From Small Groups to

Learning Communities:

Jean MacGregor,James Cooper,

Karl Smith,Pamela Robinson

New Directions for Teaching and Learning,

No. 81, 2000.Jossey- Bass

Page 24: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Informal CooperativeLearning Groups

Can be used at any timeCan be short term and ad hocMay be used to break up a long lectureProvides an opportunity for students to process material they have been listening to (Cognitive Rehearsal)Are especially effective in large lecturesInclude "book ends" procedureAre not as effective as Formal Cooperative Learning or Cooperative Base Groups

Page 25: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Formal Cooperative Learning Task Groups

Page 26: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

26

http://www.aacu.org/advocacy/leap/documents/Re8097abcombined.pdf

Page 27: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

27

Top Three Main Engineering Work Activities

Engineering Total• Design – 36%• Computer

applications – 31%• Management –

29%

Civil/Architectural• Management – 45%• Design – 39%• Computer

applications – 20%

Burton, L., Parker, L, & LeBold, W. 1998. U.S. engineering career trends. ASEE Prism, 7(9), 18-21.

Page 28: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

28

Teamwork Skills

•Communication• Listening and Persuading

•Decision Making•Conflict Management•Leadership•Trust and Loyalty

Page 29: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

29

Ideo's five-point model for strategizing by design: Hit the StreetsRecruit T-Shaped PeopleBuild to ThinkThe Prototype Tells a StoryDesign Is Never Done

Design Thinking

Discipline

Thin

king

Tom FriedmanHorizontalizeOurselves

CQ+PQ>IQ

AAC&U College LearningFor the New Global Century

Page 30: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

30http://www.stanford.edu/group/dschool/big_picture/our_vision.html

Page 31: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Design team failure is usually due to failed team dynamics (Leifer, Koseff & Lenshow, 1995).

It’s the soft stuff that’s hard, the hard stuff is easy(Doug Wilde, quoted in Leifer, 1997)

Professional Skills(Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J., “TheABET Professional Skills-Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vo. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp. 41–55.)

Page 32: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

32

Pseudo-group

Traditional G roup

C ooperative G roup

H igh-perform ing C ooperative G roup

Individual M em bers

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E L

EV

EL

TYPE O F G R O U P

Teamwork

Page 33: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

33

Characteristics of Effective Teams• ?•?

Page 34: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable

• SMALL NUMBER

• COMPLEMENTARY SKILLS

• COMMON PURPOSE & PERFORMANCE GOALS

• COMMON APPROACH

• MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY

--Katzenbach & Smith (1993)The Wisdom of Teams

Page 35: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

35

Hackman – Leading Teams

• Real Team• Compelling Direction• Enabling Structure• Supportive

Organizational Context

• Available Expert Coaching

https://research.wjh.harvard.edu/TDS/

Team Diagnostic Survey (TDS)

Page 36: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Team Charter

• Team name, membership, and roles• Team Mission Statement• Anticipated results (goals)• Specific tactical objectives• Ground rules/Guiding principles for

team participation• Shared expectations/aspirations

Page 37: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Code of Cooperation

•EVERY member is responsible for the team’s progress and success.•Attend all team meetings and be on time.•Come prepared.•Carry out assignments on schedule.•Listen to and show respect for the contributions of other members; be an active listener.•CONSTRUCTIVELY criticize ideas, not persons.•Resolve conflicts constructively,•Pay attention, avoid disruptive behavior.•Avoid disruptive side conversations.•Only one person speaks at a time.•Everyone participates, no one dominates.•Be succinct, avoid long anecdotes and examples.•No rank in the room.•Respect those not present.•Ask questions when you do not understand.•Attend to your personal comfort needs at any time but minimize team disruption.•HAVE FUN!!•?

Adapted from Boeing Aircraft Group Team Member Training Manual

Page 38: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

38

Ten Commandments: An Affective Code of Cooperation

• Help each other be right, not wrong.• Look for ways to make new ideas work, not for reasons they won't.• If in doubt, check it out! Don't make negative assumptions about each other.• Help each other win, and take pride in each other's victories.• Speak positively about each other and about your organization at every opportunity.• Maintain a positive mental attitude no matter what the circumstances.• Act with initiative and courage, as if it all depends on you.• Do everything with enthusiasm; it's contagious.• Whatever you want; give it away.• Don't lose faith.• Have fun

Ford Motor Company

Page 39: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

39

Group Ground Rules Contract Form (Adapted from a form developed by Dr. Deborah Allen, University of Delaware)

Project groups are an effective aid to learning, but to work best they require that all groups members clearly understand their responsibilities to one another. These project group ground rules describe the general responsibilities of every member to the group. You can adopt additional ground rules if your group believes they are needed. Your signature on this contract form signifies your commitment to adhere to these rules and expectations. All group members agree to:

1. Come to class and team meetings on time. 2. Come to class and team meetings with assignments and other necessary

preparations done. Additional ground rules:

1.

2. If a member of the project team repeatedly fails to meet these ground rules, other members of the group are expected to take the following actions: Step 1: (fill in this step with your group) If not resolved: Step 2: Bring the issue to the attention of the teaching team. If not resolved: Step 3: Meet as a group with the teaching team. The teaching team reserves the right to make the final decisions to resolve difficulties that arise within the groups. Before this becomes necessary, the team should try to find a fair and equitable solution to the problem. Member’s Signatures: Group Number:______________ 1.____________________________ 2.____________________________

3.____________________________ 4.____________________________

Page 40: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Group Processing Plus/Delta Format

Plus (+)Things That Group Did Well

Delta (Δ)Things Group Could Improve

Page 41: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

41

Professor's Role inFormal Cooperative Learning

1. Specifying Objectives

2. Making Decisions

3. Explaining Task, Positive Interdependence, and Individual Accountability

4. Monitoring and Intervening to Teach Skills

5. Evaluating Students' Achievement and Group Effectiveness

Page 42: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

Formal Cooperative Learning – Types of Tasks

1. Jigsaw – Learning new conceptual/procedural material

2. Peer Composition or Editing

3. Reading Comprehension/Interpretation

4. Problem Solving, Project, or Presentation

5. Review/Correct Homework

6. Constructive Academic Controversy

7. Group Tests

Page 43: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

43

Challenged-Based Learning• Problem-based learning

• Case-based learning

• Project-based learning

• Learning by design

• Inquiry learning

• Anchored instructionJohn Bransford, Nancy Vye and Helen Bateman. Creating High-Quality

Learning Environments: Guidelines from Research on How People Learn

Page 44: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

44

Challenge-Based Instruction with the Legacy Cycle

LegacyCycle

The Challenges

Generate Ideas

Multiple Perspectives

Research & Revise

Test Your Mettle

Go Public

44https://repo.vanth.org/portal/public-content/star-legacy-cycle/star-legacy-cycle

Page 45: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

45

Problem-Based Learning

Problem posed

Identify what weneed to know

Learn it

Apply it

START

Page 46: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

46

Problem Based Cooperative Learning FormatTASK: Solve the problem(s) or Complete the project.

INDIVIDUAL: Estimate answer. Note strategy.

COOPERATIVE: One set of answers from the group, strive for agreement, make sure everyone is able to explain the strategies used to solve each problem.

EXPECTED CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS: Everyone must be able to explain the strategies used to solve each problem.

EVALUATION: Best answer within available resources or constraints.

INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: One member from your group may be randomly chosen to explain (a) the answer and (b) how to solve each problem.

EXPECTED BEHAVIORS: Active participating, checking, encouraging, and elaborating by all members.

INTERGROUP COOPERATION: Whenever it is helpful, check procedures, answers, and strategies with another group.

Page 47: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

47 http://www.udel.edu/pbl/

Page 48: Pedagogies of Engagement – Cooperative Learning and Problem-Based Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -

48

Cooperative Base Groups

• Are Heterogeneous• Are Long Term (at least one quarter or semester)• Are Small (3-5 members)• Are for support• May meet at the beginning of each session or

may meet between sessions• Review for quizzes, tests, etc. together• Share resources, references, etc. for individual

projects• Provide a means for covering for absentees