pedagogical approach - tu delft web viewthe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to...

28

Click here to load reader

Upload: lamthuy

Post on 30-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

College of Management of TechnologyInstitute of Technology and Public PolicyChair, Management of Network IndustriesProf. Matthias Finger

European University Institute Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies (RSCAS)Florence School of Regulation Prof. Matthias Finger

Faculty of Technology, Policy, and ManagementDepartment of Values, Technology and InnovationSection Economics of InfrastructuresProf. Rolf Künneke

De- and re-regulation of the network industriesPhD course

Fall semester 2014October 6-10, 2014

Room ODY 10019.1, EPFL

This course aims at giving participants an insight into the de- and the re-regulation of the network industries, in particular the telecommunications, energy, water, transport and postal sectors. Participants will be introduced to the economic and regulatory aspects of the different sectors, with a special focus on EU legislation and its impact on Member States. The course will also focus on two particularly relevant theoretical perspectives on the liberalizing network industries, namely the new institutional economics perspective and the regulatory economics perspective.

Registration and coordination

The course is primarily offered to PhD students of EPFL, the European University Institute and Delft University of Technology. However, PhD students working on the network industries from other reputable Universities can also apply and will be admitted on a first-come-first- serve basis as long as the quotas are not filled. Maximum number of participants: 20.

Scientific coordination: Matthias Finger, [email protected] Administration: Patricia Defferrard, [email protected]

1

Page 2: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Course objectives

The objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries, including energy, water, telecom, transport and postal sectors. Important aspects are the ongoing liberalization process, internationalization, re-regulation, as well as the multiplication of pressures on the provision of public service and the preservation of the infrastructures’ quality. Even though there are numerous industry specificities, which the participants will be introduced to, the course aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the transformation of the above mentioned infrastructures with a cross-sector and international perspective, as well as an in-depth presentation of the key theoretical elements necessary to understand the profound transformation processes especially with respect to institutions, technology, and policy.

The ongoing de-regulation and re-regulation processes lead to challenges at many levels: from the historical operator’s perspective, used to providing clearly defined services in a monopolistic environment, the exposure to competition requires fundamental organizational and managerial changes; at political level, there is a need for new regulation to accompany the liberalization process and to ensure that the advantages expected from competition ultimately benefit the general interest. At sector level, technological innovation and consumer demand on the one hand and underinvestment on the other hand exert conflicting pressures on the quality and the upgrading of the infrastructures and the related services. This course will address these different issues so as to highlight the complexity of sector specific de- and re- regulation.

Consequently, the participants may expect the following outcomes from this course:

Understand the main stakes of the privatization and liberalization processes in the network industries

Become familiar with the main political issues in the telecommunications, energy, water, postal and transport sectors

Identify key actors of the deregulation and re-regulation process in Europe Become acquainted with the major EU Directives legislation on sector

transformation in the different industries Recognize the principal concerns related to public service and understand the

current debates around public service Become familiar with sector specific and competition regulation of the network

industries Being able to appreciate the different technological characteristics of

infrastructures and its relation to institutions and policy Understand the major challenges incumbent operators and new market players are

confronted with Get to know some of the critical infrastructure-related challenges Reflect on the consequences of sector internationalization and convergence Understand the main theoretical approaches to the de- and re-regulating network

industries

2

Page 3: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Pedagogical approach

Our pedagogical approach is based on adult learning, with a strong focus on the participants, valuing in particular their professional and research knowledge and experience. The course is focused on non-technical issues intended to complement the technical background of participants and give them a broader knowledge of the sectors, which is essential for those who seek to research one or several network industries.

For each topic, the professors will present the major issues, in order to offer the participants a basic knowledge of the sectors after which time will be made available for questions and debate. Participants may also submit specific topics which they would like to have addressed.

Requirements and Evaluation

Participants are requested to prepare the working sessions by reading the texts provided for that purpose (uploaded prior to the course). Participants are invited to prepare a 10 minutes presentation of their PhD research, to be presented on one of the scheduled afternoon sessions.

Participants will be assessed according to their active participation as well as the requirements determined by the professors in charge of the program in their respective institution. As for the participants who would like to obtain 2 credits for this course from EPFL, they will be assessed according to their active participation as well as to a 20-page paper they will hand in after the end of the course. This paper counts as the final exam. The paper shall focus on a selected aspect of one of the topics discussed during the working sessions, and preferably be related to the professional or research activities of the participants. Deadline for submission will be determined by the professors at the first working session.

Structure of the course

The course is structured into fifteen 90 minutes sessions, each of which addresses a particular topic. During the last afternoon session of each day, students’ presentations are scheduled. Each participant will have 10 minutes (strictly) to present an outline of his/her PhD research. This will be followed by short comments for no more than 10 minutes.

The following persons will teach in the course:

- Prof. Janice Beecher, Michigan State University (via videolink)- Prof. Matthias Finger, EPFL- Dr. Christian Jaag, EPFL and University of St.Gallen- Prof. Rolf Künneke, Delft University of Technology

3

Page 4: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

MondayOctober 6

TuesdayOctober 7

WednesdayOctober 8

ThursdayOctober 9

FridayOctober 10

09:00-10:30 Introduction to the de- and re-

regulation of the network industries(Matthias Finger)

Telecom-munications

(Matthias Finger)

Institutional Economics

(Rolf Künneke)

Electricity(Matthias Finger)

Air Transport(Matthias Finger)

10:30–11:00 Coffee break11:00-12:30 Postal services

(Matthias Finger)The European

approach to the regulation of the

network industries(Matthias Finger)

Beyond markets and hierarchies

(Rolf Künneke)

Firm behavior under regulation

(Matthias Finger)

Railways(Matthias Finger)

12:30-13:30 Lunch13:30-15:30 Regulatory

economics (Christian Jaag)

The US approach to the regulation of the network industries(Janice Beecher)

The governance of regulation

Co-evolution of Technology and

Institutions(Matthias Finger)

Regulation for customer protection and other political

objectives(Matthias Finger)

15:30-15:45 Tea break15:45-17:00 Students’

presentationsStudents’

presentationStudents’

presentationStudents’

presentationStudents’

presentations17:00-18-00 Apéritif offered by

the Chair MIR

4

Page 5: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Recommended literature for the preparation of the lectures

Monday October 6th 20141. Introduction (Finger)

Kessides, I.N. (2004). Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation, and Competition. Washington DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.

2. Postal services (Finger) Jaag, Christian (2014). Postal Sector Policy: from Regulation to Competition. Utilities Policy.

3. Regulatory Economics (Jaag)Crew, Michael and Paul Kleindorfer (2002). Regulatory Economics: Twenty Years of Progress? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21:1, 2-22.

Tuesday October 7th 20144. Telecommunications

Parcu, Pier-Luigi and Virginia Silvestri (2014). Electronic Communications Regulation in Europer: an Overview of Past and Future Problems. Utilities Policy.

5. The European approach to regulation (Finger)Finger, Matthias and Marc Laperrouza (2011). Liberalization of network industries in the European Union: evolving political issues. In: Matthias Finger and Rolf Künneke (Eds.). International Handbook of Network Industries. The Liberalization of Infrastucture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.345-365.

6. The US approach to regulation (Beecher)Beecher, Janice (2013). Economic regulation of utility infrastructure. In: Ingram, G. & K. Brandt (eds.). Infrastructure and Land Policies. East Lansing, MI: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp.87-122.

Wednesday October 8th 20147. Institutional Economics (Künneke).Williamson, Oliver E., 1998. Transaction Cost

Economics: How It Works, Where It Is Headed. De Economist, 146(1), 23-58.8. Beyond markets and hierarchies (Künneke) Ostrom, Elinor, 2005, Doing Institutional

Analysis: Digging Deeper Than markets and Hierarchies. In: Claude Ménard and Mary M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 819-848.

9. Spiller, Pablo and Mariano Tommasi (2005). The institutions of regulation: an application to public utilities. In: Ménard, Claude and Mary Shirley (eds.). The Handbook of New Institutional Economics. New York: Springer, pp.515-5

Thursday October 9th 201410. Electricity (Finger)

Glachant, Jean-Michel and Sophia Ruester (2014). The EU Internal Electricity Market: Done Forever? Utilities Policy.

11. Firm Behavior Under Regulation (Finger)Finger, Matthias and Carole Rentsch (2014). Yes, May, May Be: the Ambiguous Relation of State-Owned Enterprise with the State. Submitted to the Journal of Economic Policy Reform.

12. Conceptual elements (Finger)Crettenand, Nicolas and Matthias Finger (2013). The alignment between institutions and technologies in network industries (with Nicolas Crettenand). Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 106-129.

5

Page 6: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Friday October 10th 2014 13. Air Transport (Finger)

Baumgartner, Marc and Matthias Finger (2014). European Air Transport Liberalization: Possible ways out of the Single European Sky Gridlock. Utilities Policy.

14. Railways (Finger)Finger, Matthias (2014). Governance of Competition and Performnance in European Railways: an Analysis of five Cases. Utilities Policy.

15. Regulation for Consumer Protection (Finger)Finger, Matthias and Dominique Finon (2011). From “Service Public” to Universal Service: the case of the European Union. In: Matthias Finger and Rolf Künneke (Eds.). International Handbook of Network Industries. The Liberalization of Infrastucture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.54-69.

Bibliography

Abrate. G., Erbetta. F. and G. Fraquelli (2011).Public utility planning and cost efficiency in a decentralized regulation context: the case of the Italian integrated water service, Journal of Productivity Analysis 35 (3), pp. 227 - 242.

Alexandersson, G. and K. Rigas (2013). Rail liberalisation in Sweden. Policy development in a European context Original Research Article. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Volume 6, Pages 88-98.

Alonsoa, J., et al. (2013). The race for international markets: Were privatized telecommunications incumbents more successful than their public counterparts? International Review of Applied Economics, Volume 27, Issue 2, pages 215-236.

Antonowicz, M. (2011). Regulation and logistics in rail freight transport, Archives of Transport 23 (3), pp. 275-284.

Armstrong, M. & D. Sappington (2006). Regulation, Competition, and Liberalization. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XLIV, pp.325-366.

Asquer, A. (2011). Liberalization and regulatory reform of network industries: A comparative analysis of Italian public utilities, Utilities Policy 19 (3), pp. 172-184.

Assaf, G. and D. Gillen (2012). Measuring the joint impact of governance form and economic regulation on airport efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 220, Issue 1, pp. 187-198.

Ayres, I. & J. Braithwaite (1995). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bacchiocchi, E., Florio, M., Gambaro, M. (2011).Telecom reforms in the EU: Prices and consumers satisfaction, Telecommunications Policy 35 (4), pp. 382-396.

Baldwin, R. & M. Cave (2002). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baldwin, N. (2002). Competition, Convergence, and Consolidation: The New World. Power Engineering Journal, pp. 229-234.

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. & M. Lodge (eds.) (2010). The Oxford handbook of Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ballance, T., & A. Taylor (2001). Competition and Economic Regulation in Water: The Future of the European Water Industry. London: Stone & Webster.

6

Page 7: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Beecher, J. (2008). The prudent regulator: politics, independence, ethics and the public interest. Energy Law Journal, 29(2), pp.577-614.

Beesley, M.E. & S.C. Littlechield (1989). The regulation of privatized monopolies in the United Kingdom. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vo.20., No.3, pp.454-472.

Bel, G. (2011). Infrastructure and nation building: The regulation and financing of network transportation infrastructures in Spain (1720-2010), Business History 53 (5), pp. 688-705.

Bela, G., González-Gómez, F. and A. Picazo-Tadeoc (2013). The dynamics of privatization and regulation of water services: a comparative study of two Spanish regions. International Journal of Water Resources Development, Volume 29, Issue 3, pages 373-384.

Belloc, F. and A. Nicita (2011). The political determinants of liberalization: do ideological cleavages still matter? International Review of Economics 58 (2), pp. 121-145.

Belloc, F. and A. Nicita (2012). Partisan privatizations: Assessing the ideological bias. Applied Economics Letters 19 (10), pp. 959-963.

Belloc, F., Nicita, A. and P.-L. Parcu (2012). Liberalizing telecommunications in Europe: path dependency and institutional complementarities Journal of European Public Policy, pages 132-154.

Bergman, L. et al. (1998). Europe’s network industries: conflicting priorities. London: CEPR.Berg, S. and J. Tschirhart (1988). Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practices.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Beria, P., Quinet, E., de Ruz, G. and C. Schulz (2012). A comparison of rail liberalisation

levels across four European countries. Research in Transportation Economics, pp. 1-11.Beveridge, R., Hüesker, F. and M. Naumann (2014). From post-politics to a politics of

possibility? Unravelling the privatization of the Berlin Water Company , Geoforum, Volume 51, January 2014, Pages 66-74.

Biggar, D. (2012). Why regulate airports? a re-examination of the rationale for airport regulation, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 46 (3), pp. 367-380.

Bilotkach, V., Clougherty, J.A., Mueller, J., Zhang, A. (2012).Regulation, privatization, and airport charges: Panel data evidence from European airports, Journal of Regulatory Economics 42 (1), pp. 73-94.

Boardman, A., Laurin, C., Moore, M. and A. Vining (2013). Efficiency, profitability and welfare gains from the Canadian National Railway privatization. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Volume 6, Pages 19–30.

Bös, D. (2001). Regulation: theory and concepts. Bonn: Bonn Graduate School of Economics.

Bottasso, A. and M. Conti (2012). The productive effect of transport infrastructures: does road transport liberalization matter? J Regul., 38, pp.27–48.

Braithwaite, J. & P. Drahoos (2000). Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, S.J. and D. Sibley (2008). The Theory of Public Utility Pricing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buehler, S. (2004). Deregulation in Network Industries: A Policy in Search of a Rationale? In: von Hirschhausen, C., Mitusch, K. and T. Beckers (eds.). Trends in Infrastructure Regulation and Financing - International Experience and Case Studies from Germany. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 13-20.

Button, K., Kingsley, H. & R. Strough (1998). Flying into the future. Air transport in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Byatt, I. (2013). The regulation of water services in the UK. Utilities Policy, Volume 24, pp. 3-10.

Cantos, P., Manuel Pastor, J., Serrano, L. (2012).Evaluating European railway deregulation using different approaches, Transport Policy 24, pp. 67-72.

7

Page 8: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Capece, G., Cricelli, L., Di Pillo, F. and N. Levialdi (2012). New regulatory policies in Italy: Impact on financial results, on liquidity and profitability of natural gas retail companies. Utilities Policy, Volume 23, pp. 90-98.

Cave, M., Mujumdar, S.K. and I. Vogelsang (eds.) (2002). The Handbook of Telecommunication Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Chu, W-L., Kao, K-S. and S. Liao (2012). Deregulation and Network Externalities in an Accelerated Diffusion of Mobile Telephony. Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 17 Issue 2.

Clifton, J., Comín, F., Díaz-Fuentes, D.(2011). From national monopoly to multinational corporation: How regulation shaped the road towards telecommunications internationalisation, Business History 53 (5), pp. 761-781.

Cook, P. et al. (eds.) (2004). Leading Issues in Competition, Regulation, and Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Cowhey, P.& M. Klimenko (1999). The WTO Agreement and Telecommunication Policy Reforms. A Report for The World Bank. Washington: The World Bank.

Crettenand, Nicolas and Matthias Finger (2013). The alignment between institutions and technologies in network industries. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 106-129.

Crew, M. (1986). The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Crew, M. (ed.) (1989). Deregulation and diversification of utilities. Boston Mass.: Kluwer

Academic Publ.Crew, M. & D. Parker (2005). Development in the theory and practice of regulatory

economics. In: Crew, M. & D. Parker (eds.). International Handbook on Economic Regulation., pp.

Curien, N. (2000). Economie des réseaux. Paris: La Découverte.Danias, N., Swales, J.K. and P. McGregor (2013). The Greek Electricity Market Reforms:

Political and Regulatory Considerations Original Research Article. Energy Policy, Volume 62, pp. 1040-1047.

de Gouvello, B., Scott, C.A. (2012). Has water privatization peaked? The future of public water governance, Water International 37 (2), pp. 87-90.

Demsetz, H. (1968). Why Regulate Utilities. Journal of Law and Economics, pp.55-65.Devkara, G., Mahalingamb, A. and D.,A. Thillairajan (2013). Impact of Private Sector

Participation on access and quality in provision of electricity, telecom and water services in developing countries: A systematic review. Utilities Policy, Volume 27, pages 65–81.

Dimitriou, H.T. & R. Gakenheimer (eds.) (2011). Urban transport in the developing world. A handbook of policy and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Du, L., Mao, J. and J. Shi (2009). Assessing the impact of regulatory reforms on China's electricity generation industry. Energy Policy 37 (2), pp. 712-720.

Duso, T., Seldeslachts, J. (2010).The political economy of mobile telecommunications liberalization: Evidence from the OECD countries, Journal of Comparative Economics 38 (2), pp. 199-216.

European Commission (2001). Market performance of network industries providing services of general interest: a first horizontal assessment. Brussels: DG EcoFin.

Farazmand, A. (1996). Public Enterprise management. Westwood CT: Greenwood Press.Felisberto, C. (2013). Liberalisation, competition and innovation in the postal sector.

Empirical Economics, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp. 1407-1434.Filippo Belloc. F., Nicita. A., Parcu. P.L. (2012). Liberalizing telecommunications in Europe:

path dependency and institutional complementarities, Journal of European Public Policy, pp 1–23.

Finger, M., Rey, J.-N, & S. Pravato (1997). Du monopole à la concurrence. Lausanne: LEP.

8

Page 9: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Finger, M. & J. Allouche (2002). Water Privatisation. Transnational Corporations and the Re-regulation of the Water Industry. London: SPON Press (Francis & Taylor Group).

Finger, M. & C. Genoud (2004). Electricity regulation in Europe. In: Finon, D. & A. Midttun (eds.) (2004). Reshaping European Gas and Electricity Industries: Regulation, Markets, and Business Strategies. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 29-68.

Finger, M., Groenewegen, J. & R. Kunneke (2005). The quest for coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures. Journal of Network Industries, Vol.6, No.4, pp.227-260.

Finger, M. & M. Piers (2005). Air transport regulation under transformation: the case of Switzerland, Journal of Air Transportation, Vol.10, No.2, pp.20-32.

Finger, M., Allouche, J. & P. Manso (eds.) (2006). Water and liberalization: European Water Scenarios. London: IWA Publishing.

Finger, M. (2006). The postal network between competition and Universal Service provision: possible scenarios for its evolution. Competition and regulation in Network Industries, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 29-48.

Finger, M. & F. Varone (2006). Bringing technical systems back in: towards a new Europan model of regulating the network industries. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 89-108.

Finger, M. and C: Felisberto (2008). Worksharing and Innovation in the American Postal Sector. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.9, No.4, pp. 319-340.

Finger, M., Alouche, J., and P. Manso (2008). Water sector evolution scenarios: the case of Europe. Water Policy, Vol.10., No.3, pp. 221-238.

Finger, M. and P. Manso (2009). Reforms in the urban water sector: vulnerability analysis of the main elements at risk. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.10, No.2, pp.115-138.

Finger, M. and F. Varone (2009). Regulatory practices and the role of technology in network industries: the case of Europe. In: Künneke, R. et al. (eds.). The governance of network industries. London: Edward Elgar, pp.90-105.

Finger, M., Mägli, M. and C. Jaag (2010). Regulatory Governance Costs in Network Industries: Observations in Postal Regulation. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.11, No.2, pp. 207-237.

Finger, M. and P. Rossel (2010). Exploring the future of Wi-Fi. In: Lemstra W., Hayes, V. & J. Groenewegen (eds.). The innovation journey of Wi-Fi. The road to global success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.331-366.

Finger, M. and F. Abdallah (2010). Saudi Post innovative address system: integrating electronic and physical platforms. In: UPU/ITU (eds.) (2010). ICTs, new services and transformation of the Post. Berne: Universal Postal Union, pp. 101-116.

Finger, M. (2011). Towards an European model of regulatory governance? In: Levi-Faur, D. (ed.). Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 525-535.

Finger, M. and D. Finon (2011). From "Service Public" to Universal Service. In: Finger, M. & R. Künneke (eds.). International Handbook on the Liberalization of Infrastructures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.54-69.

Finger, M. and M. Laperrouza (2011). Liberalization of the network industries in the European Union: evolving policy issues. In: Finger, M. & R. Künneke (eds.). International Handbook on the Liberalization of Infrastructures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.345-365.

Finger, M. and R. Künneke (Eds.) (2011). International handbook of network industries. The liberalization of infrastucture. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton.

Finger, M. and M. Laperrouza (2012). Competition effects in a liberalized railway market. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 375-398.

9

Page 10: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Finger, M. and T. Holvad (2013).Transport Regulation in Europe: Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.

Finger, M. and N. Crettenand (2013). The alignment between institutions and technologies in network industries. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 106-129.

Finger, M. and R. Dyllick-Brenzinger (2013). Review of electricity sector reform in five large, oil- and gas-exporting MENA countries: current status and outlook. Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol.2, No.1, pp.31.45.

Fischer, M., Ingold, K., Sciarini, P. and F. Varone (2012). Impacts of Market Liberalization on Regulatory Network: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Swiss Telecommunications Sector. Policy Studies Journal, Volume 40, Issue 3, pages 435–457.

Flacher. D., Jennequin. H., Ugar, M., (2009), Has the European Union got it right? A critical analysis of the liberalization in network industries. In: Frangakis, M., C. Hermann and J. Huffschmid (eds.), (2009) Privatisation against the European Social Model: A Critique of European Policies and Proposals for Alternatives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 112-128.

Frieden, R. (2013). The mixed blessing of a deregulatory endpoint for the public switched telephone network. Telecommunications Policy, Volume 37, Issues 4–5, pp. 400-412.

Fröidh, O. and C. Byström (2013). Competition on the tracks – Passengers’ response to deregulation of interregional rail services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 56, pp. 1-10.

Fukui, Y. and K. Oda (2012). Who Should Take Responsibility for Unexpected Interest Changes? Lesson from the Privatization of Japanese Railroad System. Networks and Spatial Economics, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 263-278.

Gambardella, A., Torrisi, S. (1998) Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27, 445-463.

Genoud, C. and F. Varone (2002). Does privatization matter? Liberalization and regulation: the case of European electricity. Public Management Review 4 (2): 231-256.

Geradin, D. (2001). The Liberalization of Postal Services in the European Union. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International.

Geradin, D. (ed.) ( 2004). Remedies in Network Industries: EC Competition Law vs. Sector-Specific Regulation. Antwerp: Intersentia.

Gilardi, F. (2008). Delegation in the regulatory state. Independent regulatory agencies in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Glachant, J.-M. (2002). Why Regulate Deregulated Network Industries? Journal of Network Industries, 3, 297-311.

Glaeser, M. (1957). Public Utilities in American Capitalism. London: Routledge.Golombeka, R., Brekkeb, K.A., and S.A. Kittelsena (2013). Is electricity more important than

natural gas? Partial liberalizations of the Western European energy markets. Economic Modelling, Volume 35, pages 99–111.

Gómez Comendador, F., Arnaldo Valdés, R.M. and L.P. Sanz (2012). Liberalisation of Air Traffic Services in Spain. Transport Policy, Volume 19, Issue 1, pages 47–56.

Gómez-Ibáñez, J. (2003). Regulating Infrastructure. Monopoly, Contracts, and Discretion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gore, O., Viljainen, S., Makkonen, M.,Kuleshov, D.(2012). Russian electricity market reform: Deregulation or re-regulation?, Energy Policy 41, pp. 676-685.

Gormley, W.T. (1983). The Politicsw of Public Utility Regulation. Pittsburg PA: University of Pittsburg Press.

Gottinger, H.W. (2003). Economies of Network Industries. London: Routledge.

10

Page 11: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Graham, M. (2009). Different models in different spaces or liberalized optimizations? Competitive strategies among low-cost carriers. Journal of Transport Geography 17, pp. 306–316.

Greif, A. (2005) “Commitment, Coercion and Markets: Yje Nature and Dynamics of Institutioons Supporting Exchange”. In C. Menard and M. Shirley, Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer, pp. 727-787

Groenewegen, J. (2005). Designing Markets in Infrastructures: From Blueprint to Learning. TU Delft Inaugural Lecture.

Groenwegen, J., Spithoven, A. & A. Van den Berg (2010). Institutional economics. An introduction. New York: Plagrave McMillan.

Grzybowski, L. (2008). The impact of regulation on the retail prices in fixed-line telephony across the European Union. Telecommunications Policy 32 (2), pp. 131-144

Guérin-Schneider, L., Nakhla, M. (2012).Emergence of an innovative regulation mode in water utilities in France: Between commission regulation and franchise bidding, European Journal of Law and Economics 33 (1), pp. 23-45.

Guthrie, G. (2006). Regulating infrastructure: the impact on risk and investment, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.XLIV, pp.925-972.

Hallack, M. and M. Vazquez (2013). European Union regulation of gas transmission services: Challenges in the allocation of network resources through entry/exit schemes. Utilities Policy, Volume 25, pp. 23-32.

Harris, C. (2003). Private participation in infrastructure in developing countries. Washington: World Bank.

Harrison, J.L., Morgan, T.D. and P.R. Verkuil (1997). Regulation and Deregulation: Cases and Materials. New York: Thomson West.

Hausman, J.A. Tand W.E. Taylor (2012). Telecommunications Deregulation. The American Economic Review, Volume 102, Number 3, pp. 386-390(5).

Hausman, J.A. and W.E. Taylor (2013). Telecommunication in the US: From Regulation to Competition (Almost). Review of Industrial Organization, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 203-230.

Helm, D. & T. Jenkinson (eds.) (1998). Competition in Regulated Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Henry, C., Matheu, M. & A. Jeunemaître (eds.) (2001). Regulation of the Network Utilities. The European Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herrera-González, F., Castejón-Martín, L. (2009). The endless need for regulation in telecommunication: An explanation, Telecommunications Policy 33 (10-11), pp. 664-675.

Hirsh, R.F. (2003). Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodgson, G. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, Vol.XL, No.1.Howarth. DA., (2011). Privatisation-A Help or a Hindrance in Managing Water

Demand?, Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education 114 (1), pp 18-25Huisman, R., Kiliç, M. (2011). A history of European electricity day-ahead prices, Applied

Economics 45 (18), pp. 2683-2693.Humberto, F.A.J., Bettini, A. and V.M. Oliveira (2008). Airline capacity setting after re-

regulation: The Brazilian case in the early 2000s. Journal of Air Transport Management 14, pp. 289–292.

IEA (2005). Lessons from Liberalized Electricity Markets, Paris: International Energy Agency.

ITU (2002): Competition policy in telecommunications: the case of the United States of America. Workshop on competition policy in telecommunications, International Telecommunication Union. Document cpt/05, Geneva, 20 - 22 November 2002. At http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ni/competition/casestudies/us/us%20case%20study.pdf

11

Page 12: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Jansson, E. (2010). Deregulation and the stakeholder model. Corporate Governance 10 (2), pp. 129-139.

Jho, W. (2007). Liberalization as a development strategy: Network governance in the Korean mobile telecom market. Governance 20 (4), pp. 633-654.

Jordana, J. & D. Levi-Faur (eds.) ( 2004). The Politics of Regulation. Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Jupe, R. (2012). The privatization of British Energy: Risk transfer and the State. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Volume 37, Issue 2, ages 116–129.

Kahn, A.E. (1988). The Economics of Regulation. Principles and Institutions. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

Kahn, A.E. (2004). Lessons from Deregulation: Telecommunications and Airlines after the Crunch. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

Karova, R. (2012). Liberalization of Electricity Markets and Public Service Obligations in the Energy Community. Amsterdam: Kluwer.

Kazantsev, A. (2012). Policy networks in European–Russian gas relations: Function and dysfunction from a perspective of EU energy security. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Volume 45, Issues 3–4, pp. 305-313.

Keller, B. (2003). Competition and regulation in telecommunications: theory and application to Switzerland. Bern: Lang.

Kessides, I. (2004). Reforming Infrastructure. Privatization, regulation, and competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kessides, I. (2005). Infrastructure Privatization and Regulation: Promises and Perils. World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 81-108.

Keyaerts, N., Hallack, M., Glachant, J.-M. and W. D’haeseleer (2011). Gas market distorting effects of imbalanced gas balancing rules: Inefficient regulation of pipeline flexibility. Energy Policy, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp. 865-876.

Klein, M. 1998). Network Industries, in: Helm, D and T. Jenkinson (eds.). Competition in Regulated Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 40-76.

Laisi, M., Mäkitalo, M. and O.-P. Hilmola (2012). Stimulating competition in the liberalized railway freight market. Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 7, pp. 68-85.

Larson, P.D. (2013). Deregulation of and mergers among American and Canadian railroads: A study of four decades. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Volume 6, pp. 11-18.

Künneke, R.W. (2008) Institutional Reform and Technological Practice: The Case of Electricity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 233-265.

Künneke, R.W. (2009) Convergence of Gas and Electricity Markets: Economic and Technological Drivers, in: Bausch, A., Schwenker, B. (Eds.), Handbook Utility Management. Springer, Dordrecht.

Künneke, R.W., Finger, M. (2007) Technology Matters: The Cases of the Liberalization of Electricity and Railways. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 8, 301-334.

Künneke, R.W., Groenewegen, J.P.M., Menard, C. (2008). Aligning Institutions with Technology: Critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures, Delft, p. 27,

Künneke, R., Groenwegen, J. & J.-F. Auger (eds) (2009). The governance of network industries. Institutions, technology, policy in reregulated infrastructures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Kuratova, L. (2013). Main Directions of Improving the competitiveness of postal organizarions. International Journal of Law & Economics, Issue 7, pages 8999.

Laffont, J.-J. (1994). The New Economics of Regulation Ten Years After. Econometrica, 62(3), pp. 507-37.

12

Page 13: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Laffont, J.-J. & D. Martimort ( 2002). The Theory of Incentives. Princeton : Princeton University Press.

Lagendijk, V. (2011). 'An experience forgotten today': Examining two rounds of European electricity liberalization, History and Technology 27 (3), pp. 291-310.

Link, H. (2012). Unbundling, public infrastructure financing and access charge regulation in the German rail sector. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp. 63–71.

Littlechild, S.C. (2012). Australian airport regulation: Exploring the frontier, Journal of Air Transport Management 21, pp. 50-62.

Littlechild, S.C. (2012). German airport regulation: Framework agreements, civil law and the EU Directive Journal of Air Transport Management 21, pp. 63-75.

Lyon, T. (ed.) (2007). The Political Economy of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Majone, G. (1990), Deregulation or Re-regulation? New York: St. Martin’s Press.Majone, G. (ed.) (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.Majone, G. (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State. Causes and Consequences of

Change in the Mode of Governance. Journal of public policy, 17 (2), 139-67.Mansouri, M., A. Gorod, T. Wakeman, and B. Sauser. (2009). Maritime Transportation

System of Systems Management Framework: a System of Systems Engineering Approach. International Journal of Ocean Systems Management (IJOSM), Volume 1 Issue 2, pp. 200-226.

Mansouri, M., A. Gorod, T. Wakeman, and B.Sauser (2010). System of Systems Approach to Maritime Transportation Governance. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Volume 2166, pp. 66-73.

Mansouri, M., A. Mostashari (2010). A Systemic Approach to Governance in Extended Enterprise Systems; 4th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference; 2010, San Diego, CA, April 5-8, 2010.

McCraw, T.K. (1984). Prophets of Regulation. New York: Belknap Press.McDonald, D. and G. Ruiters (2012), The Age of Commodity: Water Privatization in

Southern Africa. London: Routledge.McNabb, D.E. (2005). Public Utilities: Management Challenges for the 21st Century.

Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Menard, C. and M. Shirley (eds) (2005) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Berlin-

Dordrecht-New York: Springer.Menard, C. & M. Ghertman (eds.) (2009). Regulation, Deregulation and Re-regulation.

Institutional perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Merkert, R. and D.A. Hensher (2013). Regulation, trust and contractual incentives around

transport contracts – Is there anything bus operators can learn from public air service contracts? Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp. 67-78.

Moreno, B. López, A. and M.T. García-Álvarez (2013). The electricity prices in the European Union. The role of renewable energies and regulatory electric market reforms, Energy, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp. 307-313.

Morgan, B. and K. Yeung (2007). An Introduction to Law and Regulation: Text and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moss, D. (2005). Network Access, Regulation, and Antitrust. London: Routledge.Müllera, A. and V. Aragonésb (2013). Details of a similar aspiration: Privatized railroad in

Argentina, deregulated railroad in the USA. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Volume 6, pp. 51–61.

Narsiah, S. (2012).The Neoliberalization of the Water and Energy Sectors in South Africa and India, The Journal of Asian and African studies, Vol. 47, No. 6, pages 679-694.

13

Page 14: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Nelson, R.R. (1994) The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3, 47-63.

Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N. (2001) Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 44, 31-54.

Newberry, D. (2001). Privatization, restructuring and regulation of network utilities. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Newbery, D. (2002). Regulating Unbundled Network Utilities. The Economic and Social Review, 33 (1), 23-42.

Newbery, D. (2004) Privatising Network Industries CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1132.Nightingale, P., Brady, T., Davis, A., Hall, J. (2003) Capacity Utilization Revisited: Software,

North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Mass).

Noam, E.M. (2010). Regulation 3.0 for Telecom 3.0, Telecommunications Policy 34 (1-2), pp. 4-10.

Nuñez. A. Liberalisation of the Electricity Sector in the European Union: Present State and Some Open Questions. Available at www.worldenergy.org/documents/p001104.pdf

Ocana, C. (2002). Trends in the management of regulation: A Comparison of Energy Regulators in OECD Member Countries, Paris:International Energy Agency.

O’Connel, J.F. & G. Williams (eds.) (2011). Air transport in the 21st century. Key strategic developments. Farnham: Ashgate.OECD (2004): Regulatory Reform in Telecommunications. Regulatory Reform in Germany. OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform. At http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/19/32408088.pdf

Ogus, A. ( 2004). Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory. Portland: Hart Publishing.Palast, G., Oppenheim, J. & T. MacGregor (2003). Democracy and Regulation. How the

Public can Govern Essential Services. London: Pluto Press.Parker, D. & D. Saal (eds.) (2003). International Handbook on Privatization. Cheltenham:

Edward Elgar.Parker, D. (2013). The privatized railways: problems foreseen, Public Money & Management,

pages 313-319.Pendleton, A. & J. Winterton (1993). Public Enterprise in Transition. London: Routledge.Peltzman, S. & C. Winston (eds.) (2000). Deregulation of network industries. What’s next?

Washinton: Brookings Institution.Peltzman, S. (2000). Deregulation of network industries: what’s next? Washington, D.C.:

AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.Pendleton, A. & J. Winterton (1993). Public enterprises in transition. London: Routledge.Petrella, A. and A. Sapio (2012). Assessing the impact of forward trading, retail liberalization,

and white certificates on the Italian wholesale electricity prices. Energy Policy, Volume 40, pages 307-317.

Phillips, C.F. (1993). The Regulation of Public Utilities: Theory and Practice. Public Utility Reports.

Pierce, R.J. (1994). Economic Regulation: Cases and Materials. New York: Anderson Publishing Company.

Pollitt, J. (2012). The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy, Volume 50, pages 128–137.

Prosser, T. (1999). Theorising Utility Regulation. The Modern Law Review Limited, pp. 196-217.

Ratinen, M., Lund, P. (2012). Analysing changes in electricity industries against actors and technologies: Utility to business transformations in Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 7 (2), pp. 87-100.

14

Page 15: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Raven, R. (2007) Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969-2003). Energy Policy, 35, 2197-2208.

Ricketts, M. (2002). The Economics of Business Enterprise. An Introduction to Economic Organization and the Theory of the Firm. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Ricketts, M. (2005). Economic Regulation: Principles, History, and Methods. In: Crew, M. & D. Parker (eds.). International Handbook on Economic Regulation. pp.34-62.

Rüster, S., Schwenen, S., Finger, M. and J-M. Glachant (2013). Strategic Energy Technology Policy towards 2050: No-regret Strategies for European Technology Push. Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, Vol.9, No.2, pp.160-174.

Saleth, R. M.; Dinar, A.(2005), The Institutional Economics of Water: A Cross Country Analysis of Institutions and Performance. Edward Elgar and the World Bank.

Samuels, W.J. and E.S. Miller (2002). The Institutionalist Approach to Public Utilities Regulation. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University Press.

Shirley, M. (ed.) (2002) Thirsting for Efficiency. The Economics and Politics of Urban Water System Reforms. New York-London: The World Bank and Pergamon Press.

Shy, O. (2001). The economics of network industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sidak, J.G. (1998). Deregulatory takings and the regulatory contract: the competitive transformation of network industries in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sidorenko. A. (2011). Electricity in Russia, In Findlay. C., The Impacts and Benefits of Structural Reforms in the Transport, Energy and Telecommunications Sectors in APEC Economies, pp 345-369, APEC Policy Support Unit.

Simonelli, F. and M.G. Caroli (2013). Harmonization of market entry regulation for the operation of air services in the European Union: A comparative survey of the implementation of Regulation (EC) no. 1008/2008 by Member States' authorities. Journal of Air Transport Management, Volume 27, pp. 39-45.

Slabá, I., Gapko, K. and A. Klimešová (2012). Main drivers of natural gas prices in the Czech Republic after the market liberalization,.Energy Policy, Volume 52, pages 199–212.

Smith, A. (2012). The application of stochastic frontier panel models in economic regulation: Experience from the European rail sector. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp. 503-515.

Spiller, P. & Tommasi, M. (2005) The Institutions of Regulation. In Menard, C. & Shirley, M. M. (Eds.) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer.

Spulbur, D. (1995). Deregulating Telecommunications. Yale Journal on Regulation, 12(26), pp.25-67.

Spulbur, D.F. and J.G. Sidak (2013). Network Access Pricing and Deregulation. Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change.

Srivastava, A.K.,   Kamalasadan, S.,Patel, D.,   Sankar, S.,   Al-Olimat, K.S. (2011). Electricity markets: An overview and comparative study, International Journal of Energy Sector Management 5 (2), pp. 169-200.

Starkie, D. (2012).European airports and airlines: Evolving relationships and the regulatory implications, Journal of Air Transport Management 21, pp. 40-49.

Swann, D. (2008). The Retreat of the State. Deregulation and Privatisation in the UK and the US. New York: Harvester Weatsheaf. Especially Chapter 2 “The Rationale of Regulation and Public Enterprise”, pp.48-87.

Szablewski, Andrzej T. (2011): The need for revaluation of the model structure for electricity liberalization. Published in: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Vol. 2011 Vol. 4(4), (2011): pp. 201-223.

15

Page 16: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Tan, J. (2012). The Pitfalls of Water Privatization: Failure and Reform in Malaysia. World Development, Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 2552-2563.

Thatcher, M. (2002). Regulation after delegation: independent regulatory agencies in Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 9, Nr 6, pp. 954-972.

Urdánoz, M. and C. Vibes (2012). Regulation and cost efficiency in the European railways industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, pp. 1-14.

Vass, P. (ed.) (2006). Regulatory Review 2004/2005. Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries, University of Bath.

Vietor, R. ( 1994). Contrived Competition. Regulation and Deregulation in America. Cambridge Mass.: Belknap Press.

Villard, P. (2011), The economic regulation of a European Hub airport: An iron triangle?, Public Works Management and Policy16 (4), pp. 300-319.

Viscusi. W.K., Vernon, J.E. and J.M. Vernon (2005). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Vogelsang, I. (2002) Incentive Regulation and Competition in Public Utility Markets: A 20-Year Perspective Journal of Regulatory Economics, 22, 5-27.

Von Tunzelmann, N. (2003) Historical Coevolution of Governance and Technology in the Industrial Revolutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14, 365-384.

Von Weizsäcker, E.U., Young, O. & M. Finger (eds.) (2005). Limits to Privatization. How to avoid too much of a good thing. London: Earthscan.

Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market. Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Walden, I. (2012). Telecommunications Law and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wengle, S. (2012). Post-Soviet Developmentalism and the Political Economy of Russia’s Electricity Sector Liberalization. Studies in Comparative International Development, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp. 75-114.

Wetzel, H. (2008). European railway deregulation: the influence of regulatory and environmental conditions on efficiency. University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics, No. 86.

Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics. Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVIII, pp.595-613.

Williamson, O.E. (2008) “Outsourcing: Transaction Cost Economics and Supply Chaoin Management”. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (2), pp. 5-16

Wilson, J.O. ( ed.) (1980). The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.World Bank (2002). Private participation in infrastructure: trends in developing countries in

1990-2001. Washington: World Bank.World Bank (2004). Reforming Infrastructure. Privatization, Regulation, and Competition.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.Wurz, A., Kuchta, K., Onay, T..T.(2011). Review on municipal sewage sludge management

in Turkey and Europe, International Journal of Global Warming 3 (1-2), pp. 116-128.Yang, H., Zhang, A. (2011). Price-cap regulation of congested airports, Journal of Regulatory

Economics 39 (3), pp. 293-312.Zhang, B. (2002) Understanding impact of convergence on broadband industry regulation:

case study of the United States. Telematics and Informatics, 19, 37-59.

Journals

Competition and Regulation in the Network Industries

16

Page 17: Pedagogical approach - TU Delft Web viewThe objective of this course is to offer the opportunity to participants to better understand the current restructuring of network industries,

Energy Policy International Journal of Regulation and Governance Journal of Institutional Economics Journal of Regulatory Economics Review of Network Industries Review of Network Economics Risk and Regulation Telecom Policy Transportation Policy Utilities Policy Yale Journal on Regulation

17