pdcwg report to ros

33
PDCWG Report to ROS Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy July 10, 2014

Upload: bell

Post on 04-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

PDCWG Report to ROS. July 10, 2014. Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy. PDCWG Meeting July 1, 2014. Reviewed June frequency control. Improved CPS1 & 2. Frequency Profile continues to be on the high side. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PDCWG Report to ROS

PDCWGReport to ROS

Sydney Niemeyer ChairNRG Energy

Don Blackburn Vice ChairLuminant Energy

July 10, 2014

Page 2: PDCWG Report to ROS

PDCWG Meeting July 1, 2014

• Reviewed June frequency control.– Improved CPS1 & 2.– Frequency Profile continues to be on the high side.

• Causes were discussed: More small high frequency “events” (small up swings in frequency). Non-conforming load MW change larger on “turn-offs” than “turn-on” would contribute to larger upswings. Must have data to prove.

• Wind turbines help with high frequency but typically not with low frequency. This keeps high frequency limited to a tighter profile on the high side.

• Two “Normal” curve profiles were suggested.– Fewer Time Error Corrections in June.

Page 3: PDCWG Report to ROS

PDCWG Meeting

• BAL-001-TRE– Implementation timeline was discussed. ERCOT and

TRE will meet to confirm dates.– Resources requesting a waiver from the standard as

allowed in the standard requested the process for confirming the waiver.

– RARF additional information needed for conventional steam turbines. A revision request will be written.

– Protocol and Operating Guide revisions will be needed and are being developed.

Page 4: PDCWG Report to ROS

PDCWG Meeting

• Reviewed June 21 frequency event.– RRS providers had 5 Resources with below expected

performance.– Non-RRS providers had 4 Resources with below

expected performance.• Reviewed June 7 frequency event.

– RRS providers had 2 Resources with below expected performance.

– Non-RRS providers had 9 Resources with below expected performance, poor data or inaccurate HSLs.

Page 5: PDCWG Report to ROS

PDCWG Meeting

• Reviewed June 23 frequency event.– RRS providers had 4 Resources with less than

expected performance.– Non-RRS providers had 8 Resources with less than

expected performance due to either on augmented energy or errors in their HSL.

• Interconnection Primary Frequency Response was excellent during each event.– -694 MW/0.1 Hz, -847 MW/0.1 Hz and -1215

MW/0.1 Hz during the 21st, 7th and 23rd events.

Page 6: PDCWG Report to ROS

PDCWG Meeting

• ERCOT will provide the PDCWG an estimate of System Inertia data in each Frequency Disturbance Report prepared for the PDCWG.

• A request for high speed frequency data on each event was requested.

Page 7: PDCWG Report to ROS

“New” Future Meeting Dates

• August 21, 2014• September 10, 2014• October 7, 2014• November 11, 2014• December 2, 2014

– All meetings at the Met Center.

Page 8: PDCWG Report to ROS

ERCOT Frequency Control ReportJune 2014

Sydney Niemeyer NRG EnergyJuly 1, 2014

Page 9: PDCWG Report to ROS

ERCOT FREQUENCY CONTROLBAL-001 CPS 1 & 2 Performance, RMS 1 and Frequency Profile

Page 10: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

3500

7000

10500

14000

17500

21000

24500

28000

31500

35000

38500

42000

45500

49000

52500

56000

59500

63000

66500

70000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

ER

CO

T P

eak

En

erg

y

NE

RC

CP

S 1

Day

ERCOT CPS1 By Day -

CPS 1 Avg CPS 1 Peak Energy

June-2014

167.02ERCOT Monthly CPS1 =

Page 11: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

3500

7000

10500

14000

17500

21000

24500

28000

31500

35000

38500

42000

45500

49000

52500

56000

59500

63000

66500

70000

80%

82%

84%

86%

88%

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

ER

CO

T P

eak

En

erg

y

NE

RC

CP

S 2

Day

ERCOT CPS2 By Day -

CPS 2 Avg CPS 2 Peak Energy

June-2014

99.33ERCOT Monthly CPS2 =

Page 12: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Interval Ending

ERCOT CPS1 15 Minute Average - Monthly Score

June-2014 167.02CPS 1 =

Page 13: PDCWG Report to ROS

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

CP

S1

Ave

rag

e

ERCOT CPS1

Monthly Average 12 Month Rolling Average

CPS1 12 Month Rolling Average = 162.86

Page 14: PDCWG Report to ROS

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

CP

S2

Month

ERCOT CPS2 Score*

CPS2

*ERCOT as a single control area is exempt from CPS2. These scores are For Information Only

Page 15: PDCWG Report to ROS

0.0100

0.0150

0.0200

0.0250

0.0300

0.0350

0.0400

0.0450

0.0500

Daily RMS1 of ERCOT Frequency

Page 16: PDCWG Report to ROS

0.0100

0.0150

0.0200

0.0250

0.0300

0.0350

0.0400

0.0450

0.0500

Daily RMS1 of ERCOT Frequency

Page 17: PDCWG Report to ROS

0.0100

0.0150

0.0200

0.0250

0.0300

0.0350

0.0400

0.0450

0.0500

Daily RMS1 of ERCOT Frequency

Page 18: PDCWG Report to ROS

60.010 <= HZ < 60.015

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

Comparing June 2010 vs June 2014 profile of frequency in 5 mHz bins

Jun-10

Jun-14

Page 19: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

On

e M

inu

te O

cc

ura

nc

es

ERCOT Frequency Profile Comparison

2010 2014

January through December of each Year

Page 20: PDCWG Report to ROS

ERCOT TIME ERROR AND TIME CORRECTION

Time Error History

Page 21: PDCWG Report to ROS

Notes

• Time error values from NRG True Time device can be slightly different from ERCOT’s Time Error but the daily delta times should be accurate.

Page 22: PDCWG Report to ROS

Time Error Corrections

• Four slow Time Error Corrections were executed in June.

• Other than the days with the TECs, 3 days had positive time error.

Page 23: PDCWG Report to ROS

-32

-30

-28

-26

-24

-22

-20

-18

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

To

tal T

ime

Err

or

-S

eco

nd

s

Lo

st -

Sec

on

ds

-G

ain

ed

ERCOT Time Error

Daily Delta Time Error

June-2014

Page 24: PDCWG Report to ROS

-40

-32

-24

-16

-8

0

8

16

24

32

40

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Tim

e E

rro

r

Lo

ss -

Dai

ly T

ime

-G

ain

ERCOT Time Error & Time Change

Time Change Time Error

July-2013June-2014

Page 25: PDCWG Report to ROS

Time Correction HistoryTotal Hours on Avg Hours Avg Corrections % Time on

Year Month Days Fast Slow Count Control Per Correction Per Day CorrectionTime Corrections

2013 Jan 31 0 3 3 9.50 3.17 0.10 1.3%Feb 28 0 6 6 18.00 3.00 0.21 2.7%Mar 31 0 5 5 17.50 3.50 0.16 2.4%Apr 30 0 1 1 5.50 5.50 0.03 0.8%May 31 0 2 2 8.50 4.25 0.06 1.1%Jun 30 0 3 3 12.50 4.17 0.10 1.7%Jul 31 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%Aug 31 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%Sep 30 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%Oct 31 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%Nov 30 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%Dec 31 0 2 2 11.50 5.75 0.06 1.5%

2014 Jan 31 0 6 6 21.75 3.63 0.19 2.9%Feb 28 0 5 5 16.50 3.30 0.18 2.5%Mar 31 0 7 7 22.00 3.14 0.23 3.0%Apr 30 0 9 9 28.00 3.11 0.30 3.9%May 31 0 11 11 35.50 3.23 0.35 4.8%Jun 30 0 4 4 12.92 3.23 0.13 1.8%Jul 31 0.00 0.0%Aug 31 0.00 0.0%Sep 30 0.00 0.0%Oct 31 0.00 0.0%Nov 30 0.00 0.0%Dec 31 0.00 0.0%

Page 26: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

To

tal H

ou

rs o

n C

orr

ect

ion

Monthly Hours on Time Correction

Hours on Control

Page 27: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

5

10

15

20

25

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Nu

mb

er o

f C

orr

ecti

on

sMonthly Time Correction Summary

Slow Fast

Page 28: PDCWG Report to ROS

ERCOT PRIMARY FREQUENCY RESPONSE PERFORMANCE

BAL-003-1 Interconnection Frequency Response and Bias Measure.

Page 29: PDCWG Report to ROS

ERCOT Primary Frequency Response – BAL-003-12015 Bias and Frequency Response Measure

Date/Time (t-0) BA BA BA Relay Lmt Value "A" Information Value "B" Information SEFRD (FRM)Time Bias R1 for Bias for R1

BA Time Zone DelFreq Time DelFreq DelFreq MW/Load Lost Adjustment MW/Load Lost Adjustment (MW/0.1Hz) (MW/0.1Hz)

12/2/2013 16:03:54 CST -0.115 16:03:54 -0.115 -0.115 0.0 0.0 842.2 0.0 -729.4 -729.4

12/8/2013 13:07:30 CST -0.068 13:07:30 -0.068 -0.068 0.0 0.0 576.7 0.0 -842.6 -842.6

12/9/2013 8:43:12 CST -0.097 8:43:12 -0.097 -0.097 0.0 0.0 905.2 0.0 -931.6 -931.6

12/17/2013 11:45:44 CST -0.089 11:45:44 -0.089 -0.089 0.0 0.0 785.6 0.0 -881.8 -881.8

12/30/2013 9:44:22 CST -0.108 9:44:22 -0.108 -0.108 0.0 0.0 784.5 0.0 -727.4 -727.4

1/6/2014 8:10:48 CST -0.128 8:10:48 -0.128 -0.128 0.0 0.0 880.8 0.0 -685.6 -685.6

1/13/2014 4:19:44 CST -0.104 4:19:44 -0.104 -0.104 0.0 0.0 834.6 0.0 -799.3 -799.3

1/25/2014 12:07:02 CST -0.077 12:07:02 -0.088 -0.088 0.0 0.0 656.9 0.0 -746.2 -746.2

2/20/2014 21:06:54 CST -0.108 21:06:54 -0.108 -0.108 0.0 0.0 454.2 0.0 -421.4 -421.4

2/28/2014 13:25:56 CST -0.101 13:25:56 -0.101 -0.101 0.0 0.0 515.5 0.0 -512.2 -512.2

3/2/2014 7:37:40 CST -0.105 7:37:40 -0.105 -0.105 0.0 0.0 542.2 0.0 -515.8 -515.8

3/3/2014 7:31:50 CST -0.076 7:31:50 -0.076 -0.076 0.0 0.0 540.9 0.0 -707.5 -707.5

3/10/2014 18:29:28 CDT -0.099 18:29:28 -0.099 -0.099 0.0 0.0 798.2 0.0 -805.4 -805.4

3/19/2014 8:41:08 CDT -0.097 8:41:08 -0.097 -0.097 0.0 0.0 770.2 0.0 -797.4 -797.4

4/2/2014 0:33:26 CDT -0.107 0:33:26 -0.107 -0.107 0.0 0.0 470.7 0.0 -441.2 -441.2

4/29/2014 8:57:58 CDT -0.058 8:57:58 -0.058 -0.058 0.0 0.0 464.0 0.0 -804.7 -804.7

5/1/2014 15:13:50 CDT -0.100 15:13:50 -0.100 -0.100 0.0 0.0 559.1 0.0 -561.6 -561.6

5/13/2014 12:31:02 CDT 0.069 12:31:02 0.069 0.069 0.0 0.0 -420.1 0.0 -608.7 -608.7

5/15/2014 4:20:24 CDT -0.068 4:20:24 -0.068 -0.068 0.0 0.0 447.1 0.0 -655.4 -655.4

5/17/2014 0:47:26 CDT -0.062 0:47:26 -0.062 -0.062 0.0 0.0 573.6 0.0 -917.8 -917.8

6/7/2014 10:31:44 CDT -0.062 10:31:44 -0.062 -0.062 0.0 0.0 523.0 0.0 -847.2 -847.2

6/21/2014 0:58:30 CDT -0.090 0:58:30 -0.090 -0.090 0.0 0.0 625.9 0.0 -694.8 -694.8

6/23/2014 13:02:04 CDT -0.071 13:02:04 -0.071 -0.071 0.0 0.0 861.1 0.0 -1215.3 -1215.3

-732.61 2014 FRM - Average Estimated Frequency Response MW/0.1 Hz using SEFRD for R1

-701.89 2014 FRM - Regression Estimated Frequency Response MW/0.1Hz using SEFRD for R1

-729.41 2014 FRM - Median Estimated Frequency Response MW/0.1Hz for BA Compliance to R1, minimum Frequency Response

Page 30: PDCWG Report to ROS

ERCOT TOTAL ENERGY AND WIND PRODUCTION

October Total ERCOT Energy and Total Energy Production from Wind Resources.

Page 31: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

MW

H

ERCOT Total Energy

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Page 32: PDCWG Report to ROS

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

MW

H

ERCOT Total Energy from Wind Generation

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Page 33: PDCWG Report to ROS

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

ERCOT % Energy from Wind Generation

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014