patient admission from ed to acute care

16
Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care Tech 581: Analyze Presentation November 11, 2008 xxxxxx Sound Removed

Upload: hestia

Post on 06-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care. Tech 581: Analyze Presentation November 11, 2008 xxxxxx. Sound Removed. Brief review of project: Patient Admission from the ED to Acute Care. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Tech 581: Analyze Presentation

November 11, 2008

xxxxxx

Sound Removed

Page 2: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Brief review of project: Patient Admission from the ED to Acute Care

The aim of this process is to reduce the lead time for safe and timely patient admission from the ED to Acute Care services. By improving the efficiency of this process, the organization will improve their accessibility, capacity, patient safety, quality of care, and patient and staff satisfaction. The primary target of this process improvement effort is to decrease patient length of stay in the ED from the time an admission order is written.

As health care moves into the era of reporting quality indicators; improving quality of care and patient safety rankings will positively affect the organization’s reimbursement rates. The consequences of not improving the efficiency of this process are reduced quality and patient safety (and possibly reimbursement rates), increased costs associated with increased elopement rates, and lost revenue as a result of increased time on diversion. Therefore, it is important to improve this process now in order to maintain reimbursement, control costs, and prevent losing revenue.

Page 3: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

16. CTQ Tree

CTQ KPIVs Customer(s) KPOV(s)

Dept. Directors

Bed Placement Manager

ED Physician

Unit Nurse

Patient

Pt. families

Patient admission time

Time between admission order written and time bed request is made

Time between bed request and patient admission to unit

ED staffing levels

Ordering protocol

Communication process b/w ED staff and Bed Placement staff

Unit staffing levels

Bed turnover time

Lab/imaging result time

Patient transport and admission protocol

Communication b/w Bed Placement staff and admitting unit

Page 4: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Data Collection Plan

Time (min) from the time an admission order is made in ED to the time a bed request is made

Time (min) from the time request is made to patient arrival in Acute Care

Reasons for delays will ultimately identify new KPIVs Data collected for 8 week days over an 11 day period (10/7 – 10/17) Collected data on 5 patients/day over 8 days = 40 patient sample

size Will graphically present:

Average order to request time/day Average request to placement time/day Total average time/day

Page 5: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

datepatient number

order to bed request

bed request to pat. Admission total time

Avg order to request time/day

Avg request to placement time/day

total avg time/day

10/7/2008 1 13 16 29 17 36.6 53.610/7/2008 2 25 10 35 17 36.6 53.610/7/2008 3 5 45 50 17 36.6 53.610/7/2008 4 14 71 85 17 36.6 53.610/7/2008 5 28 41 69 17 36.6 53.610/8/2008 6 6 56 62 64.8 32.8 97.610/8/2008 7 36 19 55 64.8 32.8 97.610/8/2008 8 135 31 166 64.8 32.8 97.610/8/2008 9 83 23 106 64.8 32.8 97.610/8/2008 10 64 35 99 64.8 32.8 97.610/9/2008 11 62 13 75 41.6 31.2 72.810/9/2008 12 53 60 113 41.6 31.2 72.810/9/2008 13 45 40 85 41.6 31.2 72.810/9/2008 14 20 20 40 41.6 31.2 72.810/9/2008 15 28 23 51 41.6 31.2 72.8

10/10/2008 16 54 17 71 46.8 31.6 78.410/10/2008 17 6 37 43 46.8 31.6 78.410/10/2008 18 39 26 65 46.8 31.6 78.410/10/2008 19 52 27 79 46.8 31.6 78.410/10/2008 20 83 51 134 46.8 31.6 78.410/14/2008 21 23 60 83 24.2 65.4 89.610/14/2008 22 15 26 41 24.2 65.4 89.610/14/2008 23 45 69 114 24.2 65.4 89.610/14/2008 24 4 78 82 24.2 65.4 89.610/14/2008 25 34 94 128 24.2 65.4 89.610/15/2008 26 80 113 193 55.2 71.8 12710/15/2008 27 79 54 133 55.2 71.8 12710/15/2008 28 5 72 77 55.2 71.8 12710/15/2008 29 85 53 138 55.2 71.8 12710/15/2008 30 27 67 94 55.2 71.8 12710/16/2008 31 52 43 95 43.6 55.4 9910/16/2008 32 9 39 48 43.6 55.4 9910/16/2008 33 83 58 141 43.6 55.4 9910/16/2008 34 47 78 125 43.6 55.4 9910/16/2008 35 27 59 86 43.6 55.4 9910/17/2008 36 16 88 104 59.8 74.8 134.610/17/2008 37 66 83 149 59.8 74.8 134.610/17/2008 38 54 49 103 59.8 74.8 134.610/17/2008 39 86 59 145 59.8 74.8 134.610/17/2008 40 77 95 172 59.8 74.8 134.6

Data file used to create trend chart

Page 6: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

ED order to Acute Care arrival

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Date

Tim

e (m

in)

Avg order to request time/day

Avg request to placement time/day

total avg time/day

Page 7: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Fishbone Diagram

Materials Processes

Adm Order

Bed Req

Equip

Lab OrderTransport

Unit admiss

Bed assign

Adm Order

People Machines

Lab/image

Bed Plcmt

Env Svcs

Admitt staff

Phys/nurses

IV pump (equip)

Lab/image

Computers

KPOV:Patient AdmissionTime

Page 8: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Data Collection Plan Cont…

Graphically present the distribution of total time, for sample data, from Admission Order to patient arrival in Acute Care unit

Further breakdown of data; identify which step(s) are contributing the most to overall time Column chart: % contribution to overall time of each step Pie Charts: distribution of reasons for delays

Anecdotal information/data used to eliminate KPIVs

Page 9: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Total Time (mins)

0

50

100

150

200

250

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Patient #

Tim

e (m

ins)

total time

Distribution of total times from Order Written to Pat. Arrival in Acute Care

Page 10: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

% Contribution to overall time of each step

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% Contribution

total avg time/day

Avg request to placement time/day

Avg order to request time/day

10/1710/1610/1510/1410/1010/910/810/7

Page 11: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

% of sample that was admitted in goal time (<= 50 mins)

Percentage Admitted in <= 50 mins

15%

85%

# pats admitted in goal time

Total # of patients

Page 12: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

% distribution of reasons why patients were not admitted in goal time

Reasons for Delays

35%

23%

42%

Bed not ready

Lab not ready

poor communication/order not sent on time

Page 13: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Information to eliminate KPIVs

Transportation is not an issue: the hospital has successfully implemented a transportation team

Lab Delays: Recently implemented I-Stat; software that will produce lab results in 5 minutes

Ordering and admission protocol/communication: subject to patient census and unit staffing levels PCU 3:1 patient to nurse ratio – regulated ICU 2:1 patient to nurse ratio – regulated ED 8:1 patient to nurse ratio – not regulated ER census increased by 8% this year Budgeted for 118 pts/day; currently 134 pats/day

Page 14: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Acute Care: # of beds cleaned/month and average turnaround time

Month Total # beds cleaned Av. Turnaround time (mins)

May '08 165 51

Jun '08 172 55

Jul '08 168 47

Aug '08 154 50

Sep '08 180 45

Oct '08 172 48

Total = 1011 Avg = 49 minutes

Page 15: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Bed Turnaround Time

Avg. Turnaround time (mins)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

May '08 Jun '08 Jul '08 Aug '08 Sep '08 Oct '08

Month

Tim

e (

min

s)

Av. Turnaround time (mins)

Page 16: Patient Admission from ED to Acute Care

Conclusions

Following thorough examination of KPIVs; Bed turnaround, staffing levels, patient volume are the main reasons for delays in the KPOV (Patient Admission Time)

Lab results delay is being rectified Communication/ordering/placement protocol significantly

affected by staffing levels and patient volume Bed turnaround time is all that is measurable; delays in

turnaround time stem from poor communication b/w unit nurses and Env. Svcs staff