part iii: people in government organizations

20
Part III: People in Government Organizations Chapter 8: The Civil Service

Upload: zareh

Post on 11-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Part III: People in Government Organizations. Chapter 8: The Civil Service. Government Civil Service Systems. Civil service system: employment system used by democratic governments to minimize political tinkering with the administrative process Employees are Hired by merit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Part III: People in Government Organizations

Chapter 8: The Civil Service

Page 2: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Government Civil Service Systems

• Civil service system: employment system used by democratic governments to minimize political tinkering with the administrative process

• Employees are– Hired by merit– Paid according to position– Protected from political interference and dismissal– Obligated to accountability

Page 3: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Public Employment

• Size of American bureaucracy is in the middle of the world’s industrialized nations

• Total U.S. government employment at the national level relatively flat in the past forty years

• Nearly half of all employees work in education and libraries

Page 4: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Fundamental Elements of the Civil Service System

• Position classification: each position is identified in terms of the special knowledge the job requires, its level of difficulty, and the responsibilities that come with it.

• Staffing

• Compensation

Page 5: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Position Classification in the Civil Service

• Positions are defined according to occupation, degree of difficulty, and responsibility.

• General Schedule (GS level) that governs most employees includes fifteen grades.

• The system attempts to prevent political interference in the hiring process.

Page 6: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Position Classification Problems

• Written descriptions rarely match actual jobs• System creates strong incentives for grade

creep– Grade creep: tendency for agencies to multiply the

number of high administrative positions, shift professional specialists to administrative roles, or seek higher classifications for existing positions

• Federal workforce has changed; makes it difficult to keep system up-to-date

Page 7: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Staffing the Civil Service

• Hiring process asks that applicants who meet minimum qualification requirements for white-collar positions take one of these exams:– Assembled examination: written test administered

usually at a number of cities throughout the country; used mostly for lower positions

– Unassembled examination: candidate submits comprehensive résumé, detailing education, training, and experience; more common for higher positions (GS-9 and up)

Page 8: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Staffing the Civil Service (continued)

• Applicants who pass exam are placed on register of individuals for hire

• “Rule of three”: the first three names on a ranked register list eligible for hire

Page 9: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Staffing Preferences

• Veterans receive a five-point bonus in the federal system; if they are disabled they get a ten-point bonus.

• Preference over equally qualified white males is given to minorities, women, and disabled applicants.

• Those already holding career positions can advance through promotion or transfer without competing against external candidates.

Page 10: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Staffing Separations

• Average length of service = seventeen years for full-time, permanent, nonpostal employees

• Hard to remove mediocre employees

Page 11: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Staffing Separations (continued)

• Separation by attrition, reductions in force, and buyouts– Reductions in force (RIFs): governments

reduce their personnel ceilings to accommodate tight budgets; practiced in early 2000 by state and local governments

– Buyouts: government offers cash incentives to employees who agree to leave government employment

Page 12: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Compensation in the Civil Service• Federal pay has tended to lag behind what employees

would earn in similar private-sector jobs.• Government tends to provide generous fringe benefits.• Civil service principle: individuals should receive equal

pay for jobs of comparable value.• Comparable worth: many state governments have

conducted these studies and found that sex-based wage differences and sex-based occupational segregation exist in their bureaucracies; some reforms have been based on these results.

Page 13: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Employee Rights and Obligations

• Unionization: about 40 percent of government employees at the federal, state, and local levels are covered by unions; rise in unionization of public employees

• Collective bargaining: used to determine conditions of employment; has increased in the public sector

Page 14: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Public-Sector Strikes• Governments do not generally concede the right

of their employees to strike against “the sovereign state”; public employees do strike but are limited.

• Civil service system and budget decisions by elected policymakers set basic conditions of work.

• No executive official can bargain over many of the issues about which the union is concerned.

• Government differs in the scope of issues on which employees and their unions want to, or are able to, bargain.

Page 15: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Employees’ Right to Privacy

• President Reagan (1986) required federal employees to refrain from the use of drugs and declared those who use illegal drugs unsuitable for employment.

• Employee unions oppose mandatory testing of urine for evidence of illegal drug use.

• AIDS testing also associated with issue of privacy.

Page 16: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Employees’ Political Activity

• Hatch Act: Congress in 1939 adopted an act to prevent pernicious political activities.

• Over time, the act has been amended in numerous ways.

• The Hatch Act was amended in 1993 to allow federal employees to be more involved in political campaigns.

Page 17: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Patronage Restrictions

• Three Supreme Court decisions have tested the constitutionality of requiring party membership or support for retention of government employment:– Elrod v. Burns (1976): The Court’s plurality

opinion condemned such patronage dismissals of non–civil service employees in nonpolicymaking positions as a violation of First Amendment rights of freedom of belief and association.

Page 18: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Patronage Restrictions (continued)

– Branit v. Finkel (1980): The Court held that in this instance party affiliation is not an appropriate requirement for the effective performance of the position’s duties.

– Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois (1990): The Court dismissed claims that the patronage practices furthered the government’s interest in securing loyal and effective employees.

Page 19: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Values in Conflict

• Civil service system, collective bargaining system, and the political system embody different values.

• Governments, unions, and political parties all vie for the loyalty and service of public employees.

Page 20: Part III: People in Government Organizations

Conclusion

• Civil Service is broken, partisan solutions to the problem

• Obama administration has made hiring reform a top priority– Got rid of KSA essay (“knowledge, skills, abilities”)– Just a resume and cover letter, no longer “rule of

three”– Increased attention to simplicity, flexibility, and

efficiency