page 1© crown copyright 2004 a review of uk met office seasonal forecasts for europe (1-8 months...
TRANSCRIPT
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 1
A Review of UK Met Office Seasonal forecasts for Europe (1-8 months ahead)
Andrew Colman, Richard Graham
Met Office Hadley Centre
Exeter UK http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/seasonal/index.html
Thanks also to Peter McLean, Margaret Gordon, Adam Scaife for providing some of the material presented
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 2
Inputs into the Met Office seasonal forecast
Dynamicalforecasting models
Analysis ofcurrent oceanobservations
Statisticalforecasting model
Analysis ofclimate trends
Skill assessed by past performance of the forecast methods
Monthly conference:
Climate Research/Ops Centre/Comms
(Met Office,ECWMF, EURO-SIP)
Research studies(e.g. PREDICATE, COAPEC, ENSO teleconnections)
Forecasts from other centres
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 3
Example: Winter 05/06 forecast: ‘…two-in-three chance of below-average temperatures over much of Europe…’
Statistical prediction, North Atlantic Oscillation
Observed May 05 SSTA
‘tripole’ pattern
Dynamical prediction from Sep05
Most-likely temperature category, DJF05/06
‘fickle’
500hPa anomaly DJF05/06
robust – but too weak (40%)
courtesy W. Norton
HadAM3 temperature response to idealised (‘May05-like’) forcing
Model studies
2005
Marked negative winter NAO predicted (-1.1)
Correct sign predicted in 2 years out of 3
Verification
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 4
Met Office winter forecast 2005/6
The forecast
A two in three chance of a colder-than-average winter for much of Europe. If this holds true, parts of the UK – especially southern regions – are expected to have temperatures below normal
There is also an indication for a drier-than-average winter over much of the UK.
Customers:• public • government (Cabinet office, EA)• planners in utilities, transport, finance & insurance, defence, aviation, local authorities• 71% of public aware, 13% took action
Observed Europe temperature anomalies
Observed UK rainfall anomalies
The outcome, DJF 2005/6
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 5
1. Forecast Methods and tools
2. Calibration (of probabilities)
3. Correcting for Climate change trend
4. Skill Assessments
5. Future plans
Focus mainly on winter and temperature
Contents
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 6
Forecast Methods and Tools (for Europe)
1.GloSea (Global Seasonal Forecast System) HadCM3 Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model adapted for
seasonal forecasting 2.5° x 3.75° x 19 level AGCM coupled with (1.25° to 0.3°) x 1.25° x 40 level OGCM 41 Member Ensemble is run out to 6 months ahead (once per month) Initial conditions from 5 ocean surface wind stress perturbations x 8 SST
perturbations + unperturbed member
2.Statistical forecast of DJF NAO index from preceding May N Atlantic SST
Spring SST Anomalies are hidden by warm surface water in Summer but tend to re-emerge in Autumn when surface water cools
(Rodwell and Folland, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2002, 128, 1413-1443)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 7
Forecast Methods and Tools (for Europe)
3. Statistical forecasts of July-August Temperature from Winter and Spring N Atlantic SST (Colman and Davey I.J.Climatol. 19 513-536 ,1999)
4. ENSO teleconnections (EG. Toniazzo and Scaife Geophys. Res. Let., 33, L24704,
2006)
5 Corrections for climate trend (developed from Scaife et. al. Geophys. Res. Let., 32,
L18715, 2005)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 8
Additional tools
DePreSys (Decadal Prediction System) run once or twice per year out to 10 years
EUROSIP model (ECMWF, Meteo-France Met Office) Also run out to 6 months on a monthly basis
NCEP CPC Model , IRI forecast viewed on internet
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 9
Raw ensemble and calibrated probabilities
Dynamical seasonal forecasts are usually produced as ensembles
(Raw Ensemble) Probabilities are based on the proportion of ensemble member forecasts within given category
Probabilities reflect uncertainty in initial conditions (used to distinguish ensemble members) but not non-linear errors in the model
To correct for non-linear model error the probabilities needs to be calibrated using historical observed data.
Raw ensemble probabilities are not calibrated. 2
2
1,3
exp[ 0.5 ( )]( )
exp[ 0.5 ( )]t
tu
u
D xP x
D x
Linear Discriminant Analysis is ourprincipal tool for combining andcalibrating forecasts
Discriminant equations are calculatedfrom historical data like regressionequations but the output is probabilitiesfor a set of forecast categories
Can take weighted mean of calibratedand uncalibrated probabilities to maximise
skill.
x
( )tP x2 ( )tD x
-vector of predictor values
-predicted NAO index
-GloSea ensemble T2m and precip
- probability of category ‘t’
-generalised squared ‘distance’ from hindcast
- predictor values when ‘t’ is observed
(takes account of skill)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 10
Prob(abv) 1/d
Prob(avg) 1/d
Prob(blw) 1/d
Principles of linear discriminant calibration
Historical predictions
eg 2 metre temperature at nearest grid-point to predicted location (plus statistical prediction for summer or winter)
mean
mean
mean
d
d
d
real-time prediction (e.g. single ensemble member)
Predicted values when above-normal category observed
Predicted values when near-normal category observed
Predicted values when below-normal category observed
‘skilful’ system
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 11
Example of different ways of weighting calibrated (discriminant) and raw ensemble probabilities ( from DJF 06/07 forecast of temperature anomaly sign)
Raw Ensemble +NAO 67% calibrated+NAO 100% calibrated+NAO
Raw Ensemble (0% calibrated) 67% calibrated 100% calibrated
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 12
Correcting for climate change trend
Trend correction needed because GloSea model (and statistical predictions) do not include
recent changes in radiative forcing
(b) Requirement to express forecasts relative to historical climatologies eg 1971-2000 which may be significantly different to present due to climate change
(c) Evidence of negative bias in recent forecasts
Trend Correction Equation FTR=FA+ CL+ TC
FTR= trend corrected forecast FA= Forecast anomaly CL= Climatology (from which forecast anomaly is calculated) TC= Trend correction (for greenhouse forcing)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 13
Evidence of need for trend correction (from 2/3 calibrated
predictions of Sept-Nov UK T2M as example)
Similar results for other seasons
With Correction Without correction
FORECASTS FORECASTS WITH TREND OBSERVATIONS
(0.15C per decade since 1975)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 14
HadCRUT3 observations (dashed) and HadAM3 (EMULATE) 18 member Ensemble mean simulated temperatures (solid) for Europe and trend estimate
0.15C per decade trend since 1975 initially estimated by Scaife et al (2005. Geophys. Res. Let. 32, L18715) using HadAM3 ensemble mean simulated temperatures for N Europe (Observed trend not used because of NAO contribution)
Trend curve extended backwards in time at 0.075C per decade
Summer (JJA) trend in simulations similar to winter
Linear approximation with “hinge” fit made to model
simulations
Trend also takes account of pre-1950 data and is a conservative estimate (assumes trend is always constant or increasing)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 15
Example probability forecast maps Calibrated GloSea; +NAO; +trend DJF T2m
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 16
ROC skill maps for 4 seasons from GloSea 2mT: 1 month lead
MAM from Feb JJA from May SON from Aug DJF from Nov
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 17
ROC skill plots: Impact of adding trend correction to Winter (DJF) temperature forecasts from August 1959-2001
Adding NAO, trend correction and raw ensemble weight improves skill
100% Calibrated 67% Calibrated 50% Calibrated Raw Ensemble
GloSea + NAO; No trend correction
Glosea + NAO; Trend corrected
GloSea only; No trend correction
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 18
Summary and future plans
SUMMARY
The Met Office use primarily a dynamical seasonal forecast system (GloSea) which has some useful skill all year round
GloSea is supplemented with SST based statistical predictions for summer and winter which enhanced skill and lead to the successful winter forecasts of 2005-6 and 2006-7
A correction for climate trend is now added which also enhances skill
FUTURE PLANS
GloSea is due to be upgraded in the next 18 months with a version of the HadGEM3 model
The new GloSea should include variable radiative forcing, hence there should no longer be a need for trend correction.
PACE project is investigating European Winter predictability
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 19
Example T2m forecast for Sep-Nov from the combination of 3 different inputs: Observed (1-17 Sept), Medium range (18-30 Sept) and Glosea for Oct-Nov
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 20
Questions ?