p2 presentation
DESCRIPTION
My second presentation of graduation studio. It explains the analyses and spatial planning on the city scale, as well as the next step on design intervention on harbour area.TRANSCRIPT
Road to SCHEVENINGENtowards a sustainable tourism destination
P2 Presentation by
Amy Ikha Yanti Santoso (4120663)
Delta Intervention Studio
26 Januari 2012
?The aims of this project are:1. Designing new public transport scenarios in The Hague, to Scheveningen and other local tourism destinations, in order to encourage a shift from private car to public transport use.
2. Designing a mixed-use development in Scheveningen Harbour, with a purpose of enhancing its place distinctiveness, attracting more investments and activities in the area.
CONTENTS of this presentation are:
1. Introduction
2. Problem statement
3. Project aims
4. Research questions
5. Methodology
6. Analysis
7. Case studies
8. The Hague’s spatial planning
9. Spatial planning assessment
10. Existing plan in Scheveningen Haven
11. Harbour development theoretical framework
12. Scheveningen Harbour master plan
13. Master plan assessment
14. Spatial planning and master plan assessment
15. The next step
INTRODUCTION tourism area life cycle (Butler, 1980)
A tourism area needs to be rejuvenated or else, it will decline..
TIME
SCHEVENINGEN
CRITICAL RANGE OF ELEMENTS OF CAPACITY
involvement
development
consolidation
stagnation
rejuvenation
ABC
D
decline
exploration
NUMBER OFTOURISTS
INTRODUCTION sustainable tourism & accessibility
“Tourism is one of the MOST SIGNIFICANT SECTORS in present world economy. It also has extensive effects on the destinations and host communities, in spatial, economic, social and environmental aspects. Because of that, there is A NEED to ensure its long-term SUSTAINABILITY, preserving not only its ability for generating capitals, but also its spatial, social, cultural or environmental assets, which contribute to its success.
In that case, sustainability principles refer to HARMONIOUS relationships among environmental, economic and socio-cultural aspects of tourism development, in order to guarantee its long-term maintenance.
ACCESSIBILITY and mobility influence the success of a tourist destination. Car is one of the most used transport mode for tourism, yet it is very environmentally-unfriendly. Because of that, sustainable tourism development needs an environmentally-friendly transport planning, where A SHIFT TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT from car-use is encouraged.”
(World Tourism Organizations, 2004)
In 2007, 49% of Scheveningen’s tourists used car, while only 34% used public transports. It causes pollutions, congestions and nuisance from angry drivers.
PROBLEMSTATEMENT tourists’ high use of car
5
21
26
31
7
12
11
10
9
13
18
27
34
35
28
22
23
19
14 20
30
25
24
166
8
42
3
17
15
2932
33
37
36
39
38
1
0 - 10 minutes
11 - 20 minutes
21 - 30 minutes
31 - 40 minutes
41 - 50 minutes
51 - 60 minutes
more than 60 minutes
1 4 km0 longer travelling time by public transport compared to car from The Hague
to Scheveningen
500 2000 m0
Area with Tra�c Problem
Area with Empty Space
Area which Connection to Water can be Strengthened
traffic problem and low spatial quality in the harbour
B
A
A
B
A shift is most likely to happen when:
1. public transport frequency is six times per hour (Rutten, 2010)
2. there is a faster public transport with better service quality (World Tourism Organization, 2004)
HOW?
PROJECTAIMS encourage a shift from car to public transport
PROJECTAIMS new public transport scenario in The Hague
Right-of-Way
Metro/Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Light Rapid Transit (LRT)
Investment cost per pairs of lanes
5 - 40 million $/km
75 - 200 ppl (1 cart)
70 - 90 km/h
500 - 800 m
3.65 - 3.75 m
10 - 50 million $/km
120 - 600 ppl (1 - 4 cart)
60 - 100 km/h
500 - 1000 m
3.40 - 3.60 m
40 - 100 million $/km
140 - 2400 ppl (1 - 10 cart)
80 - 100 km/h
500 - 2000 m
3.70 - 4.30 m
Capacity per Transit Unit and vehicle
Speed
Terminal
Lane-width (one-way)
specification
11 m8 m7.5 m
PROJECTAIMS accommodating future transport needs
BADtwo theatreshorecafamily entertainmentwellness facilitiesbudget hotel & officedesign hotel & apartmentparking garage
DEVELO
PMENT!
NEW
parking garagehigh-rise apartmentsmall theatresocial housingfive-star hotelsmall housesparking area
HAVEN680-920 houses6,200 m2 commercial functionstwo museums23,000 m2 fisheries
two hotels4,000 m2 offices7,200 m2 fish-related leisure7,200 m2 beach leisure
new programs will encourage stable flow of
passengers throughout the days and seasons
PROJECTAIMS 2x current passenger number and 3x faster
PRESENTpeak day 14,500 peoplepeak hour 4,930 people
FUTUREpeak day 29,000 peoplepeak hour 9,860 people
average travelling timeby public transport 30 minutes
average travelling timeby public transport 10 minutes
In order to encourage a shift from car-use, public transport should provide better service and faster travelling time compared to car.
Presently, car is 2x faster than public transport, so:
PROJECTAIMS harbour’s mixed-use and tourism-oriented development
“Mixed-uses and leisure activities are key factors of urban water redevelopment schemes.” (Tunbridge & Ashworth, 1992; Falk, 1992)
“Tourism-oriented development generates positive influences in urban regeneration. It can be the catalyst of radical changes in economy, social and physical aspects of a city in transition.”(Owen, 1990)
WHY ?m i x e d -use and tourism-oriented
PROJECTAIMS harbour’s development type
NORMAL TYPE
CRUISE PASSENGER TERMINAL
ARTS & CULTURE
HARBOUR-ORIENTED
If no anchor development is proposed, just a normal growth of the area.
Just as proposed in the municipality’s plan. Is it the right one for Scheveningen Harbour?
Following The Hague’s vision to be a cultural city, is Scheveningen suitable to be part of the scheme?
Apart from the existing plans and schemes, can Scheveningen develop its own unique character?
PROJECTAIMS high accessibility from The Hague to Scheveningen
PROJECTAIMS harbour’s vibrant urban life with strong place identity
RESEARCHQUESTIONS new public transport scenario
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rapid Transit (LRT) or Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)?
Which scenario provides the shortest travelling time from The Hague to Scheveningen, which maintains most of the present urban condition, while producing the least negative impacts on physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?
1. Which scenario provides the shortest travelling time?2. Which scenario has maintains most of the present urban condition?3. How are they spatially implemented?4. Which scenario produces the least negative impacts on physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?5. Which scenario is the cheapest one to implement?6. Considering its speed, cost, as well as physical, social, economic and environmental impacts, which scenario is the most suitable one for The Hague and Scheveningen?
RESEARCHQUESTIONS Scheveningen Harbour development
Normal-type, cruise passenger terminal, arts & culture or harbour-related oriented?
Which scenario is the most suitable one for Scheveningen Harbour, in order to enhance its attractiveness, place distinctiveness and generate vibrant urban life in the area?
1. Which scenario enhances Scheveningen Harbour’s place distinctiveness the most?2. Which scenario generates the most vibrant urban life in the area?3. Which scenario is the cheapest to implement?4. What are the impact of each scenario on physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?
METHODOLOGY project scheme
METHODOLOGY methods used
new public transportproviding transport mode’s specifications, construction, impact, advantage and disadvantages
harbour developmentfactors in project that generate positive impacts in harbour regeneration
OTHER JOUR-N A L A R T I -C L E S
METHODOLOGY methods used
Dutch seaside resortsScheveningen’s identity as a Dutch seaside resort
There are two purposes of doing case studies in this project. First, to investigate Scheveningen’s position among other Dutch seaside resorts. Second, to seek inspiration and guidance of integrating new public transport line to harbour development.
METHODOLOGY methods used
Harbourside, BristolThe integration of LRT and arts and culture development in Harbourside
Barceloneta, BarcelonaThe integration of BRT and normal type development in Barceloneta harbour
METHODOLOGY methods used
ATELIERK U S TK WA L IT E I T
B L A N K WA L L SEMPTYSPACES
T R A FF I CE N G IN E E R
C O A S TA LE N G IN E E R
L OC A LR E S ID E N T
Interview with expertsQuick overview on coastal development, engineering and local’s perception in Scheveningen, as well as traffic design in The Hague
Site surveyInvestigate the spatial quality of Scheveningen Harbour area to support analysis and design of master plan
METHODOLOGY methods used
Analysis
Space Syntax
Route from Den Haag to Scheveningen
Topological centralitiesRadius 3
Radius 30
Global scale
Scheveningen
Local scale
House priceIncome
Public transport networkRoad structure
Tourism-oriented programResident-oriented program
Centralities Building age
Shopping street
SedimentationTourism destination
Crime rate A N A L YSES ARE USED TO PROVIDED E S I G NCONSIDER AT I O N A N D G U I D EL I N E S
METHODOLOGY methods used
back and forth between research and design to improve product’s quality
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rapid Transit (LRT) or Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)?
Which scenario provides the shortest travelling time from The Hague to Scheveningen, which maintains most of the present urban condition, while producing the least negative impacts on physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?
Answer:
METHODOLOGY answering the questions
METHODOLOGY answering the questions
Normal-type, cruise passenger terminal, arts & culture or harbour-related oriented?
Which scenario is the most suitable one for Scheveningen Harbour, in order to enhance its attractiveness, place distinctiveness and generate vibrant urban life in the area?
Answer:
1 4 km0
Shop
Bar
Restaurant
Hotel
Museum
Monument
Parking Area
ANALYSIStourist-oriented program
in The Hague
International Zone
Museum Area
Shopping Street
1 4 km0
ANALYSIScentralities in The Hague
Scheveningen Boulevard
Scheveningen Village
Scheveningen Harbour
City Centre
Museum Area
Madurodam
Kijkduin
1 4 km0
IT SAYS: potential destinations in the new transport system
ANALYSIStourism destinations in The Hague
Railway
Highway
Tram Line
Bus Line
1 4 km0
ANALYSIStransport network in The Hague
1 4 km0
Car Route to Scheveningen
Bus 22 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 1 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 9 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 11 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 15 Route to Scheveningen
ANALYSIStransport route to Scheveningen
IT SAYS: the probable and preferrable route for BRT, LRT and RRT
1 4 km0
Destinations
Preferred BRT route
Possible BRT route
Kijkduin
Museum KwartierCity Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
MadurodamHarbour
Village
Boulevard
CONCLUSIONBRT design guidelines
IT SAYS: the destinations and preferrable route for BRT using existing bus line
1 4 km0
Destinations
Preferred LRT route
Possible LRT route
Kijkduin
Museum KwartierCity Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
MadurodamHarbour
Village
Boulevard
CONCLUSIONLRT design guidelines
IT SAYS: the destinations and preferrable route for LRT using existing tram line
1 4 km0
Destinations
Preferred RRT route
Kijkduin
Museum KwartierCity Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
MadurodamHarbour
Village
Boulevard
Destinations
Preferred BRT route
Possible BRT route
Kijkduin
Museum KwartierCity Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
MadurodamHarbour
Village
Boulevard
CONCLUSIONRRT design guidelines
IT SAYS: the destinations and preferrable route for RRT in consideration of space availability
Shop
Bar
Restaurant
Hotel
Museum
Monument
Parking Area
500 2000 m0 ANALYSIStourist-oriented program
in Scheveningen
Centralities (Public Program Concentration)
500 2000 m0 ANALYSIScentralities in Scheveningen
IT SAYS: shopping street and leisure programs are lesser in the harbour areaCHANCE OF: adding more shopping and leisure programs
School
Sport Facility
Industry and O�ce
Healthcare Facility
500 2000 m0 ANALYSISresident-oriented program
in Scheveningen
IT SAYS: the harbour area is dominated with industrial and office programsCHANCE OF: replacing them with more public-engaging programs
House Price
Income
OOSTDUINEN
Not Available
Not Available
House Price
Income
DUTTENDEL
687,000 Euro
46,200 Euro
House Price
Income
WESTBROEKPARK
638,000 Euro
44,700 Euro
House Price
Income
VAN STOLKPARK
EN SCHEVENINGSE BOSJES
600,000 Euro
32,700 Euro
House Price
Income
SWEELINCKPLEIN EN OMGEVING
363,000 Euro
45,600 Euro
House Price
Income
ZORGVLIET
555,000 Euro
34,900 Euro
House Price
Income
STATENKWARTIER
468,000 Euro
30,200 Euro
House Price
Income
RIJSLAG
326,000 Euro
22,000 Euro
House Price
Income
BELGISCH PARK
348,000 Euro
23,800 Euro
House Price
Income
STADHOUDERSPLANTSOEN
277,000 Euro
38,800 Euro
House Price
Income
SCHEVENINGEN BADPLAATS
264,000 Euro
22,100 Euro
House Price
Income
VISSERIJBUURT
249,000 Euro
18,700 Euro
House Price
Income
GEUZENKWARTIER
232,000 Euro
18,900 Euro
House Price
Income
VISSERSHAVEN
207,000 Euro
17,300 Euro
House Price
Income
OUD SCHEVENINGEN
201,000 Euro
16,700 Euro
House Price
Income
DUINDORP
143,000 Euro
15,800 Euro
500 2000 m0 ANALYSIShouse price and income
in Scheveningen (www.cbsinuwbuurt.nl)
IT SAYS: harbour area has the second lowest house price
and income in Scheveningen
CHANCE OF: incorporating high-
end housings and apartments in the
harbour area
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
DUINDORP
11
30
21
11
0
30
103
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
DUINOORD
9
62
52
11
4
39
177
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
GEUZEN- EN STATENKWARTIER
12
91
84
7
2
67
263
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
SCHEVENINGEN
37
136
112
67
9
197
558
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
ZORGVLIET
4
7
12
3
2
20
48
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
VAN STOLKPARK EN SCHEVENINGSE BOSJES
1
11
2
3
1
4
22
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
WESTBROEKPARK EN DUTTENDEL
2
14
28
4
1
11
60
OOSTDUINEN
1
5
3
4
0
10
23
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
BELGISCH PARK
6
28
26
15
4
50
169
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
Mugging
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
500 2000 m0 ANALYSIScrime in Scheveningen
(www. politie.nl)
IT SAYS: harbour area has the
highest crime rate in Scheveningen
MIGHT BE: publicly unsupervised area
creates a chance for crime to take
place
High Street Integration
Low Street Integration
500 2000 m0 SPACE SYNTAXlocal topological R3 centralities
IT SAYS: the more integrated a street is, the more possible it is to be an economic centreCHANCE OF: increasing street integration to condition a creation of economic centreMIGHT BE: low street integration contributes to high crime rate in the harbour
High Street Integration
Low Street Integration
500 2000 m0 SPACE SYNTAXglobal topological R30 centralities
IT SAYS: in global scale, the harbour area is quite well-connectedCHANCE OF: providing high accessibility to harbour’s waterfront in global scale
500 2000 m0
North Sea Main Stream Direction
Stream Direction in Detail
Sedimented Area in the Future
ANALYSISsedimentation in Scheveningen
IT SAYS: sedimentation process creates new land surrounding harbour areaCHANCE OF: potential new development area surrounding the harbour
CONCLUSIONScheveningen Harbour design strategy
1. 2.
3. 4.
new road development to improve accessibility to waterfront from surrounding area
improving connection to water and activating waterfront urban life by injecting more leisure programs
filling in the empty spaces with new programs and activities
proposing high-end housings and apartments to enhance prestige of the area
CASESTUDIES Dutch seaside resorts (Kwakman, 2010)
CASESTUDIES Dutch seaside resorts (Kwakman, 2010)
CASESTUDIES Dutch seaside resorts conclusion
Compared to other Dutch seaside resorts, Scheveningen is:
1. superior in facilities and activities it offers to tourists.
2. potential in developing its Hollands Classics character, with its distinctive Scheveningen Village.
3. potential in developing its Good Life character, with new development in the harbour.
4. potential in creating another type of tourism, Haven Leven, where all fishing, harbour activities are showcased to tourists, along with water sports and extended nightlife.
CASESTUDIES Barceloneta, Barcelona
500 2000 m0
City Centre
Harbour Area
Barceloneta Village
Yacht Marina
Industrial Area
Road
BRT Line
Barceloneta is one of the most popular beaches in Barcelona
Although the harbour areae is mostly converted to yacht marina, there are still some industrial zones left in the area.
BRT lines provide direct access to the beach. In order to achieve shorter travelling time, the stops are located further than before.
CASESTUDIES Harbourside, Bristol
200 800 m0
City Centre
Harbour Area
Millenium Square
Animation Center
Aquarium
Amphitheatre
Road
LRT Line
Harbourside is the new cultural and leisure center of Bristol
Development of cultural programs and a public square activate the urban life in Harbourside.
LRT line doesn’t cross the Harbourside, but provide a direct connection to the area, along with Bristol’s city centre.
1 4 km0
Main Stops
Other Stops
LRT Line
Museum Kwartier
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Harbour
Village
Boulevard
SPATIAL PLANNINGLight Rapid Transit (LRT) option 1
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
1 4 km0
Main Stops
Other Stops
LRT Line
Museum Kwartier
Kijkduin
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Harbour
Village
Boulevard
Madurodam
SPATIAL PLANNINGLight Rapid Transit (LRT) option 2
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
Hollands Spoor
P+R
Central Station
1 4 km0
Museum Kwartier
City Centre
Harbour
Village
Boulevard
Main Stops
Other Stops
RRT Line On-Ground
RRT Line Underground
SPATIAL PLANNINGMetro/Rail Rapid Transit (RRT) option 1
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
Kijkduin
1 4 km0
Central Station / City Centre
Hollands Spoor
Village
Boulevard
P+R
Harbour
Main Stops
Other Stops
RRT Line On-Ground
RRT Line Underground
SPATIAL PLANNINGMetro/Rail Rapid Transit (RRT) option 2
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
1 4 km0
Main Stops
Other Stops
LRT Line
BRT Line
Museum Kwartier
Kijkduin
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Harbour
Village
Boulevard
SPATIAL PLANNINGBus Rapid Transit (BRT)
+ Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 1
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
Kijkduin
Museum Kwartier
1 4 km0
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Harbour
Village
Boulevard
Madurodam
Main Stops
Other Stops
LRT Line
BRT Line
SPATIAL PLANNINGBus Rapid Transit (BRT)
+ Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 2
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
Hollands Spoor
P+R
Central Station
Kijkduin
1 4 km0
Museum Kwartier
City Centre
Harbour
Village
Boulevard
Main Stops
Other Stops
RRT Line On-Ground
RRT Line Underground
BRT Line
SPATIAL PLANNINGBus Rapid Transit (BRT) option 3
+ Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)
cost
P+R to Boulevard
destination
total track
new on-groundtrack
new undergroundtrack
altered current track
new elevatedtrack
ASSESS MENT new public transport in The Hague
LRT option 1
LRT option 2
RRT option 1
RRT option 2
BRT option 1
BRT option 2
BRT option 3
spatial planningcost
(million $)P+R to Boulevard
(minute)number of
tourism destinationstotal track length
(km)
324
489.5
1,500
1,260
430.54
595.25
1,600
8.1
5.7
7.3
6.7
8.1
5.7
6.7
8
10
8
8
9
10
9
10.85
16.3
11.1
18
15.6
21
15.9
ASSESS MENT new public transport in The Hague
LRT option 1
LRT option 2
RRT option 1
RRT option 2
BRT option 1
BRT option 2
BRT option 3
10.85
16.3
0.6
0.6
4.8
4.1
4.1
4.5
15.8
4.5
6.6
2.2
6.6
spatial planningcurrent track
alteration (km)on-ground new track
(km)elevated new track
(km)underground new
track (km)
SCHEVENINGEN HARBOUR existing plan (The Hague municipality)
680-920 houses6,200 m2 commercial functionstwo museums23,000 m2 fisheries
two hotels4,000 m2 offices7,200 m2 fish-related leisure7,200 m2 beach leisure
“Although the proposal covers all potential type of developments, such as living, working, fishing, leisure and culture, the programs are too generic. Thus, this
development doesn’t support creation of distinctive place character.”
SCHEVENINGEN HARBOUR critic on the existing plan
Thus, this project will address the need of distinctivedevelopment plan in Scheveningen Harbour
WHAT’S NEXT product delivery on P3, P4 and P5
QUESTION?