overview of besiii experiment
DESCRIPTION
Overview of BESIII Experiment. Hai-Bo Li (Representing BESIII Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics Workshop on EIC Physics July 27-30, 2013, Weihai, Shandong University, China. Outline. Introduction BESIII data sets Selected results from BESIII - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
23/4/20 1
Overview of BESIII Experiment
Hai-Bo Li(Representing BESIII Collaboration)
Institute of High Energy Physics
Workshop on EIC Physics
July 27-30, 2013, Weihai, Shandong University, China
23/4/20 2
Outline
• Introduction
• BESIII data sets
• Selected results from BESIII– Hadron spectroscopy (XYZ, light hadron spec.)– Charmonium physics– Charm physics
• Summary
2
23/4/20 3
-charm: Main physics goals Hadron spectroscopy and test of QCD at low energy: Light meson and baryon Glueball: direct test of QCD at low energy Hybrid/exotics states/multiquark states/molecular states… Charmonium(-like) spectroscopy and decays / Charmed baryon decays
Precise test of the Standard Model: R values, tau leptonic decays, CKM matrix, lepton universality test… Decay constants, form factors (in D meson decays) Neutral D mixing
New physics searches at low energy ( tiny/forbidden in SM): Rare charmonium decays: weak decays, LFV, LNV, BNV … Rare charm and tau decays: FCNC, LFV, LNV, invisible decays Rare light meson decays: /// rare decays CP violation in tau and charm: tiny in SM CP violation in baryon /charmed baryon weak decays
Exotic physics: Light dark matter candidates, Dark photon, light Higgs boson(a0), New interactions…
23/4/20 44
BESIII detector
LINAC
2004: started BEPCII/BESIII construction2008: test run2009 - now: BESIII physics run
Beijing Electron Positron Collider-II (BEPCII)
23/4/20 5
BEPCII storage ringsBeam energy: 1.0-2.3 GeVDesign Luminosity: 1×1033 cm-2s-1
Optimum energy: 1.89 GeVEnergy spread: 5.16 ×10-4
No. of bunches: 93Bunch length: 1.5 cmTotal current: 0.91 ACircumference: 237m
Achieved luminosity: 0.7×1032 cm-2s-1@3770MeV
23/4/20 6
23/4/20 7
Japan (1)Tokyo Univ.
US (6)Univ. of Hawaii
Univ. of WashingtonCarnegie Mellon Univ.
Univ. of Minnesota Univ. of Rochester
Univ. of Indiana
Europe (13)Germany: Univ. of Bochum,
Univ. of Giessen, GSI Univ. of Johannes Gutenberg
Helmholtz Ins. In MainzRussia: JINR Dubna; BINP Novosibirsk
Italy: Univ. of Torino , Frascati Lab, Ferrara Univ.Netherland : KVI/Univ. of Groningen
Sweden: Uppsala Univ. Turkey: Turkey Accelerator Center
China(29)IHEP, CCAST, GUCAS, Shandong Univ.,
Univ. of Sci. and Tech. of ChinaZhejiang Univ., Huangshan Coll.
Huazhong Normal Univ., Wuhan Univ.Zhengzhou Univ., Henan Normal Univ.
Peking Univ., Tsinghua Univ. ,Zhongshan Univ.,Nankai Univ., Beihang Univ.
Shanxi Univ., Sichuan Univ., Univ. of South ChinaHunan Univ., Liaoning Univ.
Nanjing Univ., Nanjing Normal Univ.Guangxi Normal Univ., Guangxi Univ.Suzhou Univ., Hangzhou Normal Univ.
Lanzhou Univ., Henan Sci. and Tech. Univ.
Korea (1)Seoul Nat. Univ.
Pakistan (2)Univ. of Punjab
COMSAT CIIT
~350 members52 institutions from 11 countries
The BESIII Collaboration
7
23/4/20 8
BESIII data taking status & plan
Previous data
BESIII present & future Goal
J/ BESII: 58M 1.2 B 20* BESII 10 B
’ CLEO: 28 M 0.5 B 20* CLEOc 3B
” CLEO: 0.8/fb 2.9/fb 3.5*CLEOc 20/fb
4040/4160/4260 /4360 MeV
CLEO: 0.6/fb @ 4160)
2011: 0.4/fb @ 4040)2013 : 2/fb@4260, 0.5/fb 4360 Data for lineshape
5-10/fb
R scan BESII 2012: R @2.23,2.4,2.8,3.4GeV 25/pb tau2013-2014: high mass resonances? R measurement ?
23/4/20 9
BESIII collected 3.3/fb for XYZ study (2012-2013)
4010
4190
4210
4220
4230
4245
4260
4360
4390
4420
4310
9
3810 39
00
4090
23/4/20 10
Charmonium spectroscopy• Charmonium states below open charm threshold are all observed
Above open charm threshold:
• many expected states not observed• many unexpected charmoniumlike states observed
from Ryan Mitchell
X(3872)X(3915)X(4160)X(4350)
XYZ(3940)
Y(4008)
Y(4140)
Y(4260)
Y(4360)
Y(4660)
Y(4008)
Y(4140)
Y(4260)
Y(4360)
Y(4660)
Z(4430)Z(4250)Z(4050)Z(3900)
23/4/20 11
Y(4260)
PRD86, 051102454/fb
PRL95, 142001 273/fb PRL110, 252002
967/fb
e+e- ISR(J/)
4260
(e+e- hadrons)(e+e- +-)
BESII
J/J/++
23/4/20 12
Y(4360) and Y(4660)
PRL98, 212001298/fb
arXiv: 1211.6271, CHARM2012
e+e- ISR(’)++
23/4/20 13
Select e+e +J/ at 4.26 GeV
BESIII: PRL110, 252001 (2013)525/pb @4.26 GeV
59528J/
e+e
88233J/ +
23/4/20 14
Cross section of e+e +J/
BaBar: PRD86, 051102 (2012)
Belle: 1304.0121
BESIII: (e+e- +-J/) = (62.91.93.7) pbAgree with BaBar & Belle!Best precision!
BESIII: PRL110, 252001
23/4/20 15
BESIIISignificance >8
• M = 3899.03.64.9 MeV• = 461020 MeV• 307 48 events
BESIII: PRL110, 252001 (2013)
Observation of Zc(3900) at BESIII
The mass position is 24 MeV away from DD* threshold! A Partial wave analysis is on going!
23/4/20 16
CLEOc data at 4.17 GeV arXiv: 1304.3036
• M = 388551 MeV• = 34124 MeV• 81 20 events• 6.1
BELLE : e+e- +-J/ from ISRBelle: PRL 110, 252002(2013)
• M = 3894.56.64.5 MeV• = 632426 MeV• 159 49 events• >5.2
586/pb
23/4/20 17
Zc: charged charmoniumlike states• Find a clear signature for exotic state!
• Decays to charmonium thus has a cc pair!
• With electric charge thus has two more light quarks!
Nquark 4 !
• DD* molecule? Tetraquark state? Cusp? Threshold effect?
• Do searches in πhc(1P), πψ(2S), πcJ, …
• BESIII: e+e- π+exotics, +exotics, …
23/4/20 1818
Observation of e+e- +-hc(1P)• 827 pb-1 at Ecm=4.26 GeV; 544 pb-1 at Ecm=4.36 GeV
• hcc, c hadrons [16 exclusive decay modes] pp, +-K+K-, +-pp, 2(K+K-), 2(+-), 3(+-) 2(+-)K+K-, KS
0K+-+c.c., KS0K+-+-+c.c., K+K-0
pp0, K+K-, +-, +-00, 2(+-), 2(+-0)
Ecm=4.26 GeV Ecm=4.36 GeV
LP2013, C. Z. Yuan
23/4/20 19
N(hc)=41628 Lum=827/pbB= 41.02.87.4 pb
N(hc)=35725 Lum=544/pbB= 52.33.79.2 pb
19
Ecm=4.26 GeV Ecm=4.36 GeV
Observation of e+e +hc(1P)
23/4/20 20
Puzzle of “Y(4260)”
)%6.70.66())1()4260((
))1()4260((
SY
PhY c
S(hc(1P)) = 0 S(J/) = 1
Mechanism of +hc production is exotic! Study of the substructure is motivated !
Spin-flip No spin-flip
Process with spin-flip of heavy quark is not suppressed.
Assuming the +hc(1P) is from Y(4260) decay:
23/4/20 21
Observation of Zc(4020) in e+e +hc(1P)Ecm=4.26 GeV Ecm=4.36 GeV
Simultaneous fit to 4.26/4.36 GeV data and 16 c decay modes: 6.4
M(Zc(4020)) = 4021.81.02.5 MeV(Zc(4020)) = 5.73.41.1 MeV
N= 6419
N= 5617
21
23/4/20 22
22
e+e (D*D*)++c.c. @4.26 GeV
• 827 pb-1 data at Ecm=4.26 GeV• Tag a D+ and a bachelor , reconstruct one 0 to
suppress the background.
23/4/20 23
23
Remove DD, DD*, D*D*, DsDs, …
e+e (D*D*)++c.c. @4.26 GeV
23/4/20 24
Observation of Zc(4025) in e+e (D*D*)++c.c.
Fit to recoil mass yields 40147 Zc(4025) events. >10 M(Zc(4025)) = 4026.32.63.7 MeV; (Zc(4025)) = 24.85.77.7 MeV
24
23/4/20 25
Zc(4020)=Zc(4025)?
• M(4020) = 4021.81.02.5 MeV• M(4025) = 4026.32.63.7 MeV• (4020) = 5.73.41.1 MeV• (4025) = 24.85.77.7 MeV
Close to D*D* threshold=4017 MeVMass consistent with each other but width
~2 difference
Interference with other amplitudes may change the results
Coupling toD*D* is much larger than to hc if they are the same state
Will fit with Flatte formula
High stat. dataare needed!
23/4/20 26
What next at BESIII? Precise resonant parameters
Spin-parity
More decay modes [, c, open charm,…]
Production mechanisms, production rates
Test various theoretical models
Neutral partners of Zc and Zc Excited Zc, Zc states? ZcsKJ/ states?
Other XYZ states?…
23/4/20 27
X(3872) at BESIII
23/4/20 2828
Observation of e+e X(3872)+J/
Clear ISR ’ signal for data validationX(3872) signal at around 4.23-4.26 GeV
Ecm=4.01 GeV Ecm=4.23 GeV
Ecm=4.26 GeV Ecm=4.36 GeV
23/4/20 29
Observation of e+e X(3872)
ISR ’ signal is used for rate, mass, and mass resolution calibration.N(’)=1242 ; Mass=3685.960.05 MeV; M=1.84 0.06 MeV
N(X(3872))=15.03.9 5.3 M(X(3872)) = 3872.10.80.3 MeV [PDG: 3871.68 0.17 MeV]
Sum of all energy points
23/4/20 30
Observation of e+eX(3872)
30LP2013, C. Z. Yuan
23/4/20 31
Light hadron spectroscopy
-- from charmonium decays
23/4/20 32
pp enhancement at threshold
Observed at BESII in 2003 M=1859+3
-10+5
-25 MeV Width < 30 MeV (90% CL) Agree with spin zero expectation
• Possibilities Conventional meson? pp bound state/ multiquark/
glueball/ … Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 022001
pp/J
23/4/20 33
Confirmed by CLEOc and BESIII
pγpJ/ψ J/ψ/ππψ'
BESIII-
CPC 34, 421 (2010)
fit with one resonance as BES did:pγpJ/ψ,J/'
CLEOc
M=1861 +6 -13
+7-26 MeV/c2
< 38 MeV/c2 (90% CL)
PRD 82, 092002 (2010)
23/4/20 34
55.10.5
4.01.1
221013
21817
105
PC
10))model(3.2.)syst(.)stat(0.9()ppX(Br)X/J(Br
.)L.C90@c/MeV60(c/MeV )model(4.)syst(.)stat(3913
c/MeV )model(19.)syst(.)stat(1832M
0J
34
PWA of J/pp @ BESIIIf0(2100) / f2(1910) fixed to PDG. Sig. of X(ppbar) >>30
BESIII: PRL 108, 112003 (2012)
Different FSI models Model dependent uncertainty
23/4/20 35
Mpp (GeV)
No significant narrow threshold enhancement observed here:
(1S ) pp@CLEO
ψ γpp@BESII
J / pp@BESII
PRD 73 (2006) 032001
PRL 99 (2007) 011802
EPJC 53 (2008) 15
ψ γpp@BESIII @CLEOcPRD 82, 092002 (2010)
PRL 108, 112003 (2012)
23/4/20 36
BESII: PRL 95,262001(2005)
Theoretical interpretation: pp bound state, excitation ….η Are X(pp) and X(1835) from the same source?
Statistical Significance ~ 6 Statistical Significance ~ 5.1
X(1835) in +
M=1833.7±6.1(stat)±2.7(syst)MeV=67.7±20.3(stat)±7.7(syst)MeV
'
'
23/4/20 37
Fit with four resonances (acceptance weighted BW gaussian) Three background components:
① Contribution from non-’ events estimated by ’ mass sideband② Contribution from with re-weighting
method③ Contribution from “PS background”
Red line: estimated contribution of ①+ ②Black line: total background
X(1835) in J at BESIIIBESIII: PRL 108 (2011)112003
)'('/ 0 J
mmmmxamxamxxf bkg 02/5
012/3
002/1
0 ,)()()()(
23/4/20 3838
• With bin-by-bin mass spectrum fit, we can obtain background-subtracted, acceptance-corrected angular distribution
• Consistent with the expectation for a pseudoscalar, other assumptions are not excluded.
The angular distribution of the X(1835)BESIII: PRL 108 (2011)112003
23/4/20 3939
Why are X(2120) and X(2370) interesting?PRD73,014516(2006) Y.Chen et al First time in J/ radiative decays
resonant structures are observed in the 2.4 GeV/c2 region.
it is interesting since:
• LQCD predicts the lowest lying 0-+ glueball: around 2.4 GeV/c2.
• J/-->' decay is a good channel for finding 0-+ glueballs.
Nature of X(2120)/X(2370)
pseudoscalar glueball ?
/ excited states?
……
PRD82,074026,2010 J.F. Liu, G.J. Ding and M.L.YanPRD83:114007,2011 J.S. Yu, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, Q. zhao and more…
23/4/20 40
X(18??) near the threshold position of proton-antiproton
Observations at BESIII with 225M J/ decays: ★ J/ (3( )) X(1840) arXiV:1305.5333○ J/ () X(1870) PRL107, 182001
▲ J/ (’) X(1835) PRL106, 072002 ■ J/ (ppbar) X(pp) PRL108,112003
┼ J/ () X(1810) PRD 87, 032008
arXiv:1305.5333Submitted to PRL
Are they the same particle? It is crucial to identify these Observations.
X(1840): J/ 3( )
23/4/20 41
PWA in J/
• f0(1710) and f0(2100) are dominant scalars
• f0(1500) exists (8.2σ)
• f2’(1525) is the dominant tensor
• f2(2340) exists (7.6)
• No evidence for fJ(2220)
Phys. Rev. D. 87, 092009 (2013)
23/4/20 42
Decay rate of pure glueball from LQCD
BR(J/ G(0++)) = 3.8(9)103
Pure scalar-glueball rate in J/ radiative decays: Long-Cheng Gui et al. PRL 110 (2013) 021601
f0(1710)
Pure Tensor-glueball rate in J/ radiative decays:
BR(J/ G(2++)) = 1.1(2)102Yi-Bo Yang et al. arXiv: 1304.3807 Submitted to PRL Large decay rate is predicted!
Need more experimental information!
23/4/20 43
Study of J/f0(980)0, f0(980)
f0(980)+f1/3.7
f1/1.2
f0(980)00
(1440) (1440)
BESIII: PRL 108 (2012) 182001
First observation of(1405)f0(980)0
(isospin violated decays)and J/f0(980)0
23/4/20 44
Very narrow f0(980) – much narrower than PDG value!
Possible explanation: J.J.Wu et al, PRL 108, 081803(2012) effect of Triangle Singularity!
23/4/20 45
4.2)%(17.9 ))980(a)1405((BR
))980(f)1405((BR
0
00
Large isospin breaking: (1440)f0(980)0 BESIII: PRL 108 (2012) 182001
In general, magnitude of isospin violation in strong decay should be less than 1% or at 0.1% level. For example:
%9.0)'(BR
)'(BR ,
|P|
|P|102.0
)/J'(BR
)/J'(BR 0
3
32
0
However:
23/4/20 46
3 in J/
23/4/20 47
More results on / physics(1) Measurement of -> + e+e and ++.
Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 092011 [arXiv:1303.7360 [hep-ex]].
(2) Search for and + e +c.c. decays in J/ and .
Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 032006
(3) Search for and Invisible Decays in J/ and . Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 012009
(4) Search for CP and P violating pseudoscalar decays into . Phys.Rev. D84 (2011) 032006
(5) Measurement of the Matrix Element for the Decay . Phys.Rev. D83 (2011) 012003.
On going analyses: First observation +-+First observation of 0
First observation of e+e, 0e+e-Study of ’ + …
23/4/20 48
N* resonances in decays0ppbar
Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 022001
Two new baryonic excited states are observed !
J/ (’) decays offer an window to search for the missing baryon resonances. Many results are on going now at BESIII.
23/4/20 4949
Charmonium states’, hc(1P1), c(1S), c(2S)
23/4/20 50
hc(1P1) state • Spin singlet P wave (S=0, L=1)• Potential model: if non-zero P-wave spin-spin interaction:
DMhf(1P) = M(hc) - <m(1 3PJ)> ≠0 where <m(1 3PJ)>= [(M(c0)+3M(c1)+5M(c2)]/9
•The hc(1P1) state was observed by CLEOc in 2005.
Theoretical prediction:
BF((2S)0hc) = (0.4-1.3)×10-4
BF(hcc) =48% (NRQCD)BF(hcc) =88% (PQCD) Kuang, PR D65 094024 (2002)
BF(hcc) =38% Godfrey and Rosner, PR D66 014012(2002)
23/4/20 51
hc from inclusive (2S)0hc @BESIII
• Select inclusive 0
Br((2S)0hc) = (8.4 ± 1.3 ± 1.0) ×10-4
51
backgroundsubtracted
BESIIIPRL 104,
132002 (2010)
23/4/20 52
hc from E1-tagged (2S)0hc,hcc @BESIII
Select E1-photon to tag hc
M(hc) = 3525.40 ± 0.13 ± 0.18 MeV/c2
(hc) = 0.73 ± 0.45 ± 0.28 MeV/c2 (< 1.44 MeV/c2 @ 90% CL)
Br(ψ(2S)π0hc )×Br(hcc ) = (4.58 ± 0.40 ± 0.50) ×10-4
BESIIIPRL 104, 132002 (2010)
backgroundsubtracted
Combined inclusive and E1-photon-tagged spectrumBr(hcc) = (54.3 ± 6.7 ± 5.2) %
23/4/20 5353
’ 0hc, hcc , c exclusive decays
Simultaneous fit to 0 recoiling mass2/d.o.f. = 32/46Mass = 3525.31±0.11±0.14 MeV/c2
Width = 0.70±0.28±0.22 MeV/c2
CLEOc exclusive results Mass =3525.21±0.27±0.14 MeV/c2
evts. =136±14
Consistent with BESIII inclusive results
Mass = 3525.40±0.13±0.18 MeV/c2
Width = 0.73±0.45±0.28 MeV < 1.44 MeV (90% C. L. )
Summed distribution
832±35 evts.
BESIII: PRL 104 132002 (2010)CLEOc: PRL 101 182003 (2008)
BESIII: PRD 86, 092009 (2012)
23/4/20 5454
BESIII: PRL 104 132002 (2010) CLEOc: PRL 101 182003 (2008)
Mass : 3525.40±0.13±0.18 MeV/c2 Mass: 3525.28±0.19±0.12 MeVWidth: 0.73±0.45±0.28 MeV Width: fixed to 0.9 MeV <1.44 MeV @90%
Hyperfine mass splitting : DMhf(1P)= M(hc ) - <m(1 3PJ )>
BESIII: 0.10±0.13±0.18 MeV/c2
CLEOc: 0.02±0.19±0.13 MeV/c2
hc parameters
23/4/20 5555
c(1S)• The lowest lying S-wave spin singlet charmonium, discovered in 1980 by MarkII.
Properties not well known.• J/ radiative transition: M ~ 2978.0MeV/c2, ~ 10MeV process: M = 2983.1±1.0 MeV/c2, = 31.3±1.9 MeV• CLEOc found the distortion of the c line shape in ’ decays.
• hyperfine splitting M(J/)-M(c(1S)) is the important exp. input to test LQCD, but is dominated by error on M(c(1S)).
Mass width
C.L.<0.0001C.L.=0.0014
cc
pp, B decays (1S, 2S)c
23/4/20 56
56
Asymmetric lineshape in J/ decay Symmetric lineshape in production
Symmetric c lineshape from 0hc, hcc
BESIIIPRD 86, 092009 (2012)
BESIIIPRD 86, 092009 (2012)
Background subtracted
23/4/20 5757
Possible interference has been taken into account
KsK KK0
KsK3 2K20 3()
C resonance parameters from C at BESIII
mass: 2984.30.6stat0.6sys MeV/c2
width: 32.01.2stat1.0sys MeV
PRL 108 (2012) 222002
Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 222002
23/4/20 5858
Comparison of the mass and width for c(1S)
LQCD McNeileQWG 2011• The most precise measurement
• Better agreement with LQCD calculation.
Mass = 2984.3±0.6±0.6 MeV/c2
Width = 32.0±1.2±1.0 MeV
Hyperfine splitting: M(1S) = 112.6 ± 0.8 MeV
23/4/20 59
• Crystal Ball’s “first observation” of ' X never been confirmed PRL 48 70 (1982)
• Observed in different production mechanisms• BKc(2S) • c (2S)KK• double charmonium production
• M1 transition ’c(2S) CLEOc found no signals in 25M ’. BF(’c(2S)) < 7.6×10-4 CLEOc: PRD 81 052002 (2010)
c (2S)
Belle: PRL 89 102001 (2002), NPPS.184 220 (2008), PRL 98 082001(2007)CLEOc: PRL 92 142001 (2004) BaBar: PRL 92 142002 (2004); PR D72 031101(2005), PR D84 012004 (2011)
Experimental challenge : detect photons of 50 MeV
23/4/20 6060
First observation of c(2S)@BESIII
• Observed signal in KsK+-+c.c. , found evidence in K+K-0
• First measured Br(‘ c(2S))=(6.8±1.1±4.5) ×10-4
Potential model expectation: (0.1-6.2)10-4 PRL 89 162002 (2002) CLEOc: <7.6×10-4 PRD 81 052002 (2010)
Statistical significance >10 BESIII: PRL109, 042003 (2012)
23/4/20 61
Charm physics at BESIII
Advantage of open charm at thresholde+e colliders@threshold:
Good for charm flavor physics: • Threshold production: clean • Known initial energy and quantum numbers • Both D and Dbar fully reconstructed (double tag) • Absolute measurements
61
23/4/20 6262
Pure leptonic decays
• All quantities are well measured except fD.• Use world average |Vcd| to extract fD
• Compare fD with LQCD for the validation of LQCD
23/4/20 63
D+ Leptonic Decays
23/4/20 64
D+ Leptonic Decays – Comparisons
G. Rong CHARM2012
23/4/20 65
Semileptonic D decay Decay rate depends on kinematics and VCKM
Form factor encapsulates QCD bound-state effects Consider Pseudoscalar final states: K, π
Precise measurement of |Vcx|2f+(q2), get Vcx from CKMunitarity to extract form factor as test of Lattice QCD-
or reverse the logic and test of CKM unitarity.
23/4/20 66
One third of total data@(3770)
23/4/20 67
One third of total data@(3770)
23/4/20 68
23/4/20 69
23/4/20 70
Summary
70
• BEPCII peak Luminosity of 0.7x1033 achieved.• Lots of progress on hadron spectroscopy • BESIII starts study of XYZ particles • First confirmed exotic state with at least four
quarks Zc(3900) • Observation of Zc’(4020) and Zc’(4025) • BESIII is in her golden age, nearly 60 papers have
been published since 2009 • More results will come soon, stay tuned!
23/4/20 7171
Thank you!