oregon facilities summer 2011
DESCRIPTION
Solutions for building owners and managers.TRANSCRIPT
SPECIAL EDITION: Best Practices in Green Buildings
Summer 2011
2 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
OREGON BUILDINGS SUMMER 2010 I 3
2016
Mixed-Use FacilitiesTwelve West earns LEED PlatinumCertification
Education FacilitiesCommunity consensus vitalfor energy efficient design
DEPARTMENTS
SUMMER 2011
FEATURES
6
12
4
1822
1115
24
262830
Editor’s LetterGreen strides in the industry
Concrete and MasonryImproving efficiency of exterior walls
Social ResponsibilityOur impact on the planet
RecyclingDeconstruction wise alternative to demolition
Building ControlsTurning invisible efficiency measures into
visible savings
UtilitiesData center works with Energy Trustof Oregon to improve efficiency
Real Estate LawProtect your green innovation
LEEDCritical success factors of a LEED EBOM project
BrieflyOHSU Center for Health and Healing a BOMA360 building
Hotel FacilitiesHotel promotes innovation, tradition
InteriorsRedefining greenbuilding interiors
On the Cover: Twelve West. Photo courtesy of Timothy Hursley.
4 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
CONTACTPublisherTravis [email protected]
Managing EditorKelly [email protected]
AdvertisingThomas Farwell
Editorial AssistantBrooklyn [email protected]
Art DirectorDoug Conboy
Contributing Writers
Managing EditorOregon Facilities
Oregon FacilitiesPO Box 970281Orem, Utah 84097Office: 801.224.5500Fax: 801.407.1602JengoMedia.com
EDITOR’S LETTER
Don AslettEric BaxterJim CrowderBrad FullmerAmanda
GilchristSusan Jowaiszas
Douglas LichterVictor PollakScott RoseArtemis
VamianakisDavid L. Wolff
Oregon continues to forge ahead in sustainable practices. This PacificNorthwestern state ranks fifth in the United States for LEED-Certifiedcommercial and institutional space per person, according to the U.S. GreenBuilding Council. Oregon also ranks third in the nation for building codeenergy efficiency and fourth for overall energy efficiency policy and programs.
Local government entities have encouraged sustainable practices by adopting codesand policies that must be followed by those in the commercial real estate industry.The Department of Consumer and Business Services Building Codes Divisionrecently adopted the 2010 Oregon Energy Efficiency Specialty Code, a new energycode for commercial buildings.The code will require increased insulation andhigher performing windows, automatic lighting controls and more efficientmechanical systems.The City of Portland adopted a green building policy andfunded a Green Building Initiative, which is designed to expand market demandand provide technical services and resources for the building industry.
Although following mandates that have trickled down from governmententities, Oregon building owners and facility managers recognize the sweepingbenefits of green and are adopting the practices in their own real estate. Greenbuildings reduce energy and operating costs while increasing lease andoccupancy rates and property values. High performance buildings also increaseproductivity, improve employee wellness, enhance corporate culture, attract andretain tenants and provide a more functional workspace.
ZGF Architects wanted to incorporate sustainable design strategies into amodern, state-of-the-art mixed-use facility in order to embody the culture ofthe company. The architectural firm was able to create a functional headquartersthat reflected their attitude toward sustainable design. The 23-story, $137million Twelve West building in Portland's West End neighborhood wasawarded LEED Platinum Certification for its efforts (see page 4).
The Heathman Hotel was recently overhauled to incorporate sustainable practicesinto the operations of the building (see page 14). The 85-year-old building nowuses 50 percent less water and saves approximately 20 percent in HVAC energyand natural gas costs. In remodeling the hotel's bathrooms to be more efficientand sustainable, nearly 100 percent of the debris from the former bathrooms wasdiverted from the landfill and donated to a non-profit organization.
The ability to conserve energy and provide a healthier space for tenants hasnever been easier as more and more vendors join the green bandwagon.Building owners and managers can employ a number of practices to green theirfacilities, including cleaning green, retro-commissioning and using clean power.The possibilities are endless.
The publisher is not responsible for the accuracy of the articles in Oregon Facilities. The information containedwithin has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Neither the publisher nor any other partyassumes liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on this material. Appropriate professional adviceshould be sought before making decisions.
Copyright 2011 Oregon Facilities Magazine. Oregon Facilities is a Trademark owned by Jengo Media.
Oregon Facilities is a proudBOMA National Associate member.
Please Excuse our Error: Port ofPortland Executive Director Bill Wyattwas misnamed in the article on theBetterBricks Awards in the Spring2011 Edition of Oregon Facilities.
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 5
6 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
In terms of looking at the future of sustainable design and
stylistic, high-end functionality, look no further than the23-story, $137 million Twelve West building in Portland’s
up-and-coming West End neighborhood.The 525,000 square-foot project, which was recently awarded
LEED Platinum Certification from the U.S. Green BuildingCouncil (the highest Leadership in Energy and EnvironmentalDesign Certification given), incorporates cutting-edge,sustainabledesign strategies into a modern,state-of-the-art mixed-use facility.
The building includes retail space on the street level, fourfloors of office space for ZGF Architects LLP, 17 floors ofapartments and five levels of below-grade parking. It also
features an eco-roof, a rooftop garden and terrace space, acomplete fitness studio and a theater.
“It’s certainly cutting edge in many respects,” said PatrickWilde, project manager for developer Gerding Edlen ofPortland, a firm which has developed seven LEED Platinumprojects to date, along with more than 20 others that haveearned either LEED Gold or Silver Certifications. “This was aproject we focused a lot of time and energy into making it avery unique mixed-used building, one that people will takenotice of in terms of its overall design and sustainability.”
“We had outgrown the space we were in and were lookingfor a single headquarters that embodies the current culture of
By Brad Fullmer
Sustainable Sustainable Twelve West Building Earns LEED PlatTwelve West Building Earns LEED Plat
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 7
ZGF, which has been growing along with the city of Portlandtowards a more sustainable future,” said Peter van der Meulen,ZGF associate partner and the firm’s project manager onTwelve West. “We wanted to find a downtown site that wecould reinvest in Portland in that way and develop a projectthat had the vitality we were looking for as a 24-7 business.
“The site we found is right at the crossroads of twodeveloping neighborhoods that had such great potential,” vander Meulen continued. “We created a project that was devisedspecifically for ZGF; our aspiration was creating a functionalnew headquarters, but we also wanted it to reflect our attitudetowards sustainable design.”
The north roof of the building features four wind turbines— the first installation of a wind turbine array on an urbanhigh rise building in the United States. The turbines sit ongalvanized steel masts and have exposed aluminum heads thatwill generate approximately 10,000 to 12,000 kilowatt hours ofelectricity annually — a little more than 1 percent of thebuilding’s overall electrical usage.
“We jumped through a lot of hoops to earn LEEDPlatinum (Certification),” Wilde added. “The turbines are avery visible display of our efforts, and the commitment fromZGF to make this building as sustainable as possible.”
StyleStyletinum for Office, Residential and Retail Space
continued on page 8
Photo courtesy of Basil Childers
tinum for Office, Residential and Retail Space
8 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Energy Efficiency in ActionTwelve West has numerous sustainabledesign features, including the following:
• Four rooftop wind turbines whichgenerate 10,000 to 12,000 kilowatts ofelectricity annually.
• Solar thermal panels heat 24 percent ofhot water used in the building.
• Roof gardens clean, detain and filterrainwater and significantly reduce rooftemperatures in warmer months.
• Low-e glass admits 35 percent ofvisible sunlight but reflects 74 percentof the associated heat, reducing energyuse for lighting and space cooling.
• Rainwater re-use in toilet flushing onthe office floors and to irrigate thegreen roofs reduces use of city water bymore than 280,000 gallons per year.
• Water-efficient plumbing fixturesreduce water use by more than 40percent.
• Operable windows provide occupantsfresh air, cooling and a connection tothe outdoors.
• Daylight sensors switch off electriclights when there is ample daylight,reducing lighting energy use by 60percent.
• Exposed concrete moderates indoor airtemperatures.
• Passive/chilled beams provide energy-efficient cooling on hot days.
Twelve West occupies half a block
between SW 12th and 13th Avenues
and Washington Street in downtown
Portland, just south of the popular Pearl
District, and is one of the first new
significant buildings to be constructed
in the city’s West End.
ZGF had a number of design
criteria, including enhancing the overall
Portland skyline with a transparent
building that connects the tenants to
the outside urban landscape. Thesouthern façade of the structure isslightly angled, and there are subtletextural aspects including operablewindows, balconies and recessedstainless steel of varying color andshades, along with semi-opaque panels.
The use of wood is utilizedthroughout the office space to reflectthe surrounding Pacific Northwest.White oak floors in the reception areacreate a visual barrier between thepublic and employee spaces and
extensive white oak paneling is used onevery floor. FSC-certified wood is usedin the floor, sliding wood panels, stairtreads and wood doors. The receptiondesk in the lobby was crafted out ofsalvaged Oregon walnut and designedby Gene Sandoval, ZGF design partnerfor the building. It was hand-craftedlocally without any fasteners.
On the building’s north façade,where outside views are obstructed onthe lower floors by adjacent
structures, a light well ensures
continued from page 7
Photo courtesy of Basil Childers
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 9
• Under-floor air distribution efficientlydelivers moderate temperature airdirectly to occupants.
• Personal adjustable floor vents providecontrol over ventilation.
• Water storage tank temporarily storesup to 22,000 gallons of rainwater andcondensation for re-use.
• Efficient central cooling plant in thenearby brewery blocks provides chilledwater for space cooling.
• Rainwater harvesting piping gathers270,000 gallons of rainwater from theroofs.
• Condensation of 13,000 gallons ofwater from the air handler system willcollect during summer months.
sunlight is able to filter down fromunobstructed floors above and
a yellow accent wall helps enliven thespace.
“Our office reflects our culture as afirm and the design values we try toinstill with all the projects we design,”said Nancy Fishman, a principal withZGF. “It’s a beautiful, modern,functional office and one that webelieve is beneficial to our employees.”
Energy Efficiency, WaterConservation, Comfort:All Critical Design Aspects
Initial modeling predictions statethat energy efficiency strategies utilizedin the building will reduce consumptionof energy by more than 44 percentbeyond ASHRAE 90.1-2004, andexceed the 2030 Challenge benchmarksfor this project type. Some of theefficiency measures include: thermalmass, daylighting and occupancysensors on electric lights, low-flowfixtures for reduced domestic hot waterdemand, high-efficiency mechanicalequipment, heat recovery, fan-assistednight flush of the office floors, chilledbeams and hydronic baseboard heat inthe office floors and CO2 sensors forventilation demand control in largevolume spaces.
In addition to the four wind turbinesat the north edge of the roof, TwelveWest includes 1,360 square feet of flatplate solar hot water collectors.
Water efficiency is achieved througha combination of conservation andstormwater reuse. Due to the state ofOregon’s restrictions on reuse of
stormwater in residential applications,
reuse had to be kept to the toilet
flushing of the office floors. The
building houses a 50,000 gallon storage
tank in the underground garage, part of
which is dedicated to fire suppression,
with the remaining 22,000 gallons
devoted to reuse in irrigation and toilet
flushing. This system, which gathers
and filters runoff from the rooftops as
well as condensation from the
mechanical system, is projected to reuse
286,225 gallons annually. This will
supply 100 percent of the green roof ’s
irrigation needs and 90 percent of the
office’s flushing demands.
The Systems Development Charge
from the City of Portland’s Bureau of
Environmental Services was cut by 30
percent as a result of the reduced
combined sewer contribution. That
savings of more than $200,000 covered
90 percent of the first cost of the
system, vastly reducing the payback
period for this investment.
Copious amounts of natural
daylight, expansive views to the outside,
operable windows, underfloor air,
chilled beams, radiant heating and
cooling, CO2 monitoring and low-
emitting materials throughout the
tower combine for healthy living and
working environments. In the case of
this highly transparent tower, great care
had to be taken to modify the thermal
performance of the envelope while not
losing visual access to the outdoors and
daylight. The office floors and
residential units are designed to allow
Revolutionary Turbinesin an Urban Setting
• The turbines, which are visible fromthe street, sit on galvanized steelmasts and have exposed aluminumheads; the blades are grayfiberglass; the nose cone is lightgray fiberglass.
• Special footings hold the masts,dampening the vibration of thespinning blades; masts can be laiddown on the roof for service.
• Each turbine weighs less than 200pounds and is self-contained; itconverts DC power to AC and sendsit directly to the building's electricalsystem.
• The three blades on each turbine are12 feet in diameter; noise fromturbines should be no worse thanthe sound of an electric fan.
Project TeamDeveloper, Construction Manager:Gerding Edlen Development Co., LLCArchitect, Interior Design,Landscape Architecture:ZGF Architects LLPGeneral Contractor:Hoffman Construction Co.MEP Engineers:Glumac, Total MechanicalStructural Engineer:KPFF Consulting EngineersCivil Engineer: David Evans and Assoc.Acoustics: Altermatt Assoc.
continued on page 10Photo courtesy of Timothy Hursley
access to views and daylight to morethan 90 percent of all regularly occupiedspaces, while not allowing excess solarradiation to create unnecessary coolingloads.
Office cooling is mostly achievedthrough a combination of anUnderfloor Air Distribution System(UFAD) and natural ventilation
through operable windows.The UFAD
system delivers air directly to the
occupied zone near the floor at more
moderate temperatures and velocities
than a conventional ventilation system,
using less energy and providing better
occupant comfort. The system also
provides individual control of air flow
via adjustable diffusers at each
workstation. The modular raised floor
allows for repositioning of tiles with
diffusers to suit changing office layouts
and preferences, and the area under the
floor is an easily accessible plenum in
which to run data and electrical wiring.
On unusually hot days, passive
chilled beams add cooling capacity to
keep the office space comfortable.
Passive chilled beams are perforated
metal coils mounted near the ceiling
and chilled with cold water. As air in
the office space is warmed by the sun,
people and equipment, it will rise
toward the ceiling, be cooled by the
chilled beams and fall once again to the
floor to keep inhabitants cool. Passive
chilled beams save energy over
conventional systems by moving heat
with water instead of air and by moving
air without the use of fan energy.
These sustainable features
emphasize to current and future clients
of ZGF that building a green, highly-
sustainable project is worth the extra
up-front costs and illustrates to owners
and developers that there is a legitimate
return on investment over time.
“Clients tend to focus too hard on
the up-front cost, when the real value
of their investment is over time,” said
van der Meulen. “It’s come to play on
this project because we’re an owner, and
the end game was to save money over
time. “We have created something we
can live by.” OF
10 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Photo courtesy of Nick Merrick, Hedrich Blessing
continued from page 9
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 11
concrete and masonry
Improving Energy Efficiency of Exterior WallsBy David L. Wolff
If there is any hope of reducing the
carbon emissions created by the
construction and operation of
buildings, the focus must be on making
existing building stock as energy
efficient as possible. This makes good
sense, given the high percentage of
existing buildings to new construction
and the large amount of energy
consumed to operate these buildings. As
much attention should be devoted to
making existing buildings better as is
devoted to making new buildings as
efficient as they can be.
However, the task of upgrading the
energy performance of an existing
building — especially an older building
— is not something to be embarked upon
lightly.The obvious areas of improvement
such as window upgrades or replacement
and adding opaque wall insulation can
sometimes prove to be either
uneconomical or downright destructive.
For example, historic and other older
buildings are often built of unreinforced,
load-bearing masonry. This provides a
unique challenge when it comes to
improving energy efficiency. Likely 80
percent or more of the exterior wall area
of an older building is opaque — leaving
20 percent or less area for windows —
and all that wall space seems to cry out
for insulation. It stands to reason that if
the R-value of the opaque wall is
improved, the energy performance can
be improved, and energy costs can be
lowered. The problems lie in how to
change the hygrothermic performance
of the wall by adding insulation.
Hygrothermic means heat and
moisture transfer through building
materials. In a load-bearing masonry
building, for instance, the moisture that
starts out as rain on the exterior surface
and makes its way to the interior as
absorbed moisture in the masonry, dries
to the inside with the help of the heating
system. The wall gets wet, the wall dries
out. This has occurred for 100 years in
many older buildings. From ahygrothermic perspective, this is whathas contributed to the longevity of thehistoric building stock.
Unfortunately, the wetting and dryingcycle, in the absence of thermal insulation,does little for energy conservation.
When interior insulation (and oftenalso a vapor barrier) is added to a wallassembly, the hygrothermic performancechanges. The wall stays colder, and thuswetter, as it loses its ability to dry to theinside. That extra moisture can causeserious problems such as mold,decomposition of the brick and mortar,corrosion of metal fasteners in the wall,rot of wooden beams bearing inmasonry beam pockets, efflorescenceand in colder climates, spalling due tofreeze/thaw cycling.
Another common problem whenimproving an older, unreinforced load-bearing masonry building is that aseismic upgrade is sometimes requiredby code. When this is the case, anotherlevel of complexity is added to theexterior wall. The most commonmethods of seismic upgrade involveeither adding concrete to most of theinterior surface of the exterior masonryor constructing a shear wall that can addlateral support and a medium for tyingback the masonry. Both of thesesolutions create difficulties – again bychanging the hygrothermic performanceof the wall.
The basic principles of buildingenclosure design are pretty simple. Forany enclosure and condition you mustcontrol the movement of moisture, air,vapor and heat. Keeping moisture undercontrol is first and foremost the mainfocus of any enclosure.To that end, whenlooking at improving the energyperformance of a particular structure, beconscious of all the variables and analyzethe performance of the system as a whole.
One helpful tool is the hygrothermicmodeling software WUFI (Wärme undFeuchte instationär: Transient Heat and
Moisture), created by the Fraunhofer
Institute for Building Physics in
Germany and supported in the United
States by the U.S. Department of
Energy and Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. The software can give
projected temperature, humidity and
water content levels for a given assembly
using real, local weather data. Using this
analysis, variables can be analyzed and
problems can be predicted before
committing to what could be costly
mistakes on a building.
Case studies have shown that it pays
to look at the entire building when
considering an energy upgrade. By
analyzing the life cycle costs of various
options for improving energy
performance and then focusing on the
best value items, the approach can be
prioritized. Often upgrading lighting
and mechanical system controls,
refurbishing windows and adding attic
insulation (which is often relatively easy
and does not present all of the same
potential problems as insulating opaque
walls) can dramatically improve the
energy efficiency of the building
without breaking the budget or putting
the structure at risk.
Sometimes it is possible to upgrade
the exterior wall by adding insulation.
Sometimes replacing worn out windows
makes a great deal of sense. Often the
best, most cost-effective path to better
energy performance is not the most
obvious. Through careful analysis of the
unique circumstances found in existing
buildings, wasted energy can be
economically reduced and, at the same
time, the enormous investment can be
preserved in existing building stock.
David Wolff is a licensed architect and
building enclosure consultant with The
Facade Group, LLC in Portland, Oregon.
Wolff can be reached at
12 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Collaboration is the key to
designing 21st Century
learning environments for
Oregon students of all ages.
Developing community consensus
around schools and educational
delivery is a dynamic process fueled by
the collaboration of many audiences,
each with passionate points of view.
Today, in addition to developing
consensus and reaching decisions on
traditional issues of site, educationalprogram and design, the role ofsustainability is an ever increasingelement of the design process.
When a collaborative designprocess commits to the tenets ofArchitecture 2030 as design goals, theresult is more than a school. Theoutcome is a learning environmentthat elevates student performance andentire communities, equipping each tocompete in a local and global economy.
Elevating Education inScappoose
Scappoose is in a semi-rural areajust outside the Portland metro. Itspopulation of 6,000 is split betweenprofessional/administrative workersand production/industry/agriculturalfamilies. In Scappoose, the designteam engaged a community thatpossessed a passionate interest for asustainable approach as it worked toupgrade its educational facilities.
Non-Profit Program, Architecture 2030, is Changing the Way Buildingsare Designed and ConstructedBy Scott Rose
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 13
The process began by inviting the
Scappoose school community to a
high performance design charrette to
investigate sustainable design
opportunities for this project. The aim
was to share insights and ideas and
collaborate with all stakeholders to
develop a sustainability-oriented
approach for the Petersen Elementary
School design. Design team
participants in architecture,
engineering (structural, mechanical
and electrical), landscape and interiors,
along with a representative from the
Oregon Department of Energy, met
with approximately 75 community
members for an all-day environmental
work session.
An initial brainstorming exercise
identified significant community
commitment to water and energy
efficiency and interest in options for a
high-performance building envelope.
Building on the themes of the eco-
charrette, the next phase of community
engagement was a traditional design
charrette. Over the course of three days,
designers collaborated with school
community representatives to develop
design goals and compose design
options in response to those goals.
The final design for Otto Petersen
Elementary School reflects the desires
and discoveries through this
community collaboration. This school
meets the needs of both the Scappoose
School District and the greater
community.
Petersen Elementary is designed to
seamlessly integrate with an existing
K-3 center adjacent to the site. The
resulting design is a comprehensive
and sustainable K-6 facility. Four
distinct zones were created in this
design: vehicular, learning, play and
pastoral. These boundary definitions
inform the building organization and
create dedicated spaces on the site.
Three distinct volumes define the
school’s footprint. While each unique
shape could stand as its own building,
all three are unified by a circulation
spine. This serves as a gathering space
for group learning, assembly space for
the cafeteria and a learning commons
for the library. Interior nodes along the
spine define learning and play spaces,
while exterior nodes delineate the play
and pastoral outdoor areas. On the
upper level, the library reaches over the
bus loop, connecting to the landscape
to the south.
Elevating Sustainable DesignAccording to the Architecture 2030
website (www.architecture2030.org),
buildings are responsible for 74.5
percent of U.S. electricity
consumption, 50.1 percent of energy
usage and 49.1 percent of carbon
dioxide emissions.
The tenets and sustainable
benchmarks of Architecture 2030
should be the primary design goals for
every project in the public sector. This
is especially true in construction of
new schools where entire structure and
site materials, mechanical systems,
landscaping and spaces can be weaved
into the curriculum to teach
understanding of sustainability and
environmental stewardship.
In many buildings, sustainability is
invisible. It’s the clean, fresh air that is
taken for granted. It’s decreasing water
use in bathrooms. Or it’s the source of
the material you’re standing on while
engaged in an activity.
But at Petersen Elementary, the value
of sustainable choices and building
features are linked to everyday learning.
MaterialsAt Petersen Elementary, the
approach focused on maintaining
greenspace, minimizing displacement
and re-purposing natural materials.
The site placement, design and
construction preserved 70 percent of
the total trees on site. Trees and wood
displaced during construction were re-
purposed for monument signage,
benches, planter boxes for the roof
garden and mulch.
WaterRain gardens throughout the site
and at the main entry detail the
movement of water across the school
grounds. The rain gardens enhance a
student’s understanding of the process
of natural water filtration, absorption
and how landscape impacts water flow
and quality.
The Petersen rain gardens also
reference the cultural heritage of the
Scappoose community. In the
Chinook language, “Scappoose” means
“gravely plains” or “rocky creek,” which
inspired the winding-creek design of
the rain garden plan.
A second-level roof garden
specifically targets opportunities for
structured outdoor learning. Multiple
structured planters provide individual
planting areas for each grade level and
continued on page 14
PetersenElementary School Location: Scappoose, OregonSize: 70,270 square feet ofindoor and outdoor learningsupport spacesGrades: 4-6Date Completed: August 2010Project Team:DLR Group, Architect,Educational Planning, Design,Interior Design, MEPEngineering, StructuralEngineeringCornerstone ManagementGroup, Program ManagerP&C Construction, GeneralContractorCardno WRG, LandscapeArchitectureMGH Engineers, CivilEngineering
14 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
special needs, learning programs.
Rainwater is harvested over 5,500
square feet (half of the gymnasium
roof ) and directed to a storm water
cistern. Stored water is used for all
toilets and urinals. Projected rainfall
will contribute to 42 percent of flushes
using harvested rainwater, with
connections to the city water system
providing the rest when the cistern is
dry. Low-flow restroom fixtures
include ultra high-efficiency urinals
and solar powered dual-flush toilets.
SystemsWith design goals based on
Architecture 2030, energy efficiency
was a focal point at Petersen
Elementary.
The high performance building
envelope features R24 minimum at all
walls, R30 at all roofs. Renewables
designed to provide energy savings
include photovoltaic panels on the
library roof that also double as
sunshades and windows with extreme
southern exposures.
The mechanical system uses
displacement ventilation in high
occupancy areas to introduce air at
room height. This allows air to be
introduced at lower temperatures, with
resulting energy savings, to achieve
target comfort levels. Ventilation
sensors at windows in classrooms
automatically shut down variable air
volume distribution into spaces when
windows are opened. Energy savings
also are achieved through a high-
efficiency chiller. Heat recovery in the
air-handling units is designed to
extend the value of the energy used to
heat the air.
The design team used modeling for
the design of occupancy sensors to
regulate lighting. This modeling is
targeting 20 percent less energy than
called for by the Oregon State Energy
Code. Skylights and a translucent
ceiling system illuminate common
areas on both levels. Every classroom is
day lit and optimized to negate
window glare effects. This natural
lighting creates a more natural and
harmonious internal environment for
students.
All of these features come together
inside the school as part of the
curriculum. Kiosks with video
monitors (green screens) inside the
school enable students to monitor the
building’s energy use and conservation.
From the building design, to the
building resources and the curricula,
Petersen Elementary School is truly a
lesson in sustainability. Students
realize how small changes, such as
minimizing energy usage, maintaining
green space and re-purposing natural
materials, can affect the environment
in a big way. The ultimate lesson
imparted to students at Petersen
Elementary School is how to become
global citizens.
Scott Rose, LEED
AP, is a principal
with DLR Group
in Portland. He
leads the f irm’s K-
12 practice in
Oregon managing
projects through the
design life cycle, from community
meetings through construction
administration to completion. Contact
DLR Group at 503.274.2675. OF
Petersen Elementary features a variety of sustainable features to enhance the learning experience for students andteachers and to benefit the environment.
continued from page 13
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 15
social responsibility
V isiting Hawaii once, my wife
and I were walking from our
beachfront hotel through a
yard full of fragrant flowers. I stopped
and picked one of the plumaria flowers
from a tree and romantically stuck it in
my wife’s hair.
A neatly dressed gardener nearby
looked up and pleaded, “Please don’t
pick the flowers. If everyone did, the
tree would be bare in a single day, and
stay that way for the rest of the year,
with nothing left for others to enjoy.”
That was a right-on-target lesson
that I deserved to hear. I was not alone
in my little urges and activities. With
all of those other people out there on
this planet, there is a surprising
multiplication of our actions, even the
smallest ones.
Thus a seemingly insignificant act
can cast a long shadow. Such as
recently when a middle-aged couple
caught up with me at an event I was
attending. The woman grabbed me by
the arm and blurted out, “Oh, Mr.
Aslett, we attended one of your
cleaning seminars 25 years ago in
Riverside. It was wonderful and made
a great change in my life.”
She went on to compliment me
further until her husband, who was not
so taken with all of this, stepped up
somewhat grumpily and said, “Yeah, I
remember going there, and I only
learned one thing — to turn my socks
and underwear right side out after I
took them off and before I put them in
the hamper. That’s all I got out of it.”
His wife, still clinging enthusi-
astically to my arm, said, “Yes, and he
has done it every day since. That’s
25,000 times I’ve been saved having to
do that myself before I put them in the
washer.”
The same is true of single, little,
daily, earth-friendly actions like
recycling that can or jar instead of
trashing it or remembering to use the
reusable grocery bags you bought,
instead of paper or plastic. As one
pebble tossed into a still pool can
generate a hundred ripples, one single
wise principle or act can have
unimaginable cumulative value. Good
or bad is never a stand-alone process,
because no man is an island. It all
counts, now or later. Our little
individual actions, all added up, will
determine our ultimate outcome: the
future of the world.
Don Aslett, the
founder of Varsity
Contractors, has
revolutionized both
the home and the
workplace with his
popular cleaning
services, products and books. He has
written more than 30 books relating to
building maintenance. OF
Little Me, Make a Difference?By Don Aslett
‘‘ ‘‘...There is a
surprising multiplication
of our actions, even the
smallest ones.
16 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Historic Hotel Promotes Innovation andTradition with Sustainable UpgradesBy Kelly Lux
Upgrading the Heathman Hotel, which was built in 1927,
to be more environmentally sustainable while preservingthe building's natural and culture uniqueness, has been,
and continues to be, an ongoing process.Since 2006, significant changes have been made by hotel
management to reduce the building's energy use and associatedelectrical and natural gas consumption, increase guest comfort,improve operations, increase property value, create diagnostic toolsfor staff and add to the economic vitality of the travel industryand the city of Portland. To date, the Heathman Hotel hasupgraded its HVAC control systems for the central plants andcommon areas, participates in the Blue Sky Renewable Energyprogram through Pacific Power, replaced all guest room lightingwith compact fluorescent bulbs, remodeled the 155 hotelbathrooms, upgraded each guest room's HVAC unit as well as thetemperature controls and most recently upgraded its domestic hotwater boilers, heating hot water boiler plant and water cooledchilled water plant.
“Innovation is critical to our success,” said Heathman HotelGeneral Manager Chris Erickson. “It is only natural to take a long,hard look at the building facilities and best practices and positionourselves for the next 20 to 25 years as a model of sustainabilityand efficiency.”Photo courtesy of John Rizzo photography
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 17
The 150-room, 115,000 square-foot Heathman Hotel promotesinnovation and tradition. Managementwanted to ensure the buildingremained an icon in Portland for thenext 90 years. Sustainableimprovements seemed the mostobvious and rewarding solution,Erickson said.
Initially, partnering with EnergyTrust of Oregon and its trade allies,energy management consultant firmViking Energy Services and thecontractor, Environmental ControlsCorp., Heathman spent six monthsupgrading the chilled water andheating hot water central plant controlsystems and common area temperaturecontrol systems to a DDC system andapproximately $150,000 to reduce itscarbon footprint. That partnership wascrucial to the process, Erickson said.Now, an estimated 149,941 kilowatthours of electricity and 15,197 thermsof natural gas are saved by the hoteleach year. Monthly savings are close to20 percent.
“The Heathman Hotel views itselfas a responsible leader in sustainability,particularly in the category of historicsustainability and preservation,” saidErickson.
In addition to saving energy andnatural gas, Heathman Hotelpartnered with Pacific Power toparticipate in their Blue SkyRenewable Energy program — theonly hotel in downtown Portlandenrolled at the 30 percent level in theprogram. Now, 30 percent of the totalenergy usage by guests and employeesis renewable.
Using the incentive or rebatemoney available through Energy Trustof Oregon, Existing BuildingsProgram, Heathman was able to moveforward with more sustainablemeasures, including an upgrade of allguest room lights to compactfluorescent bulbs. Annual kilowatthour consumption in the guest roomswas reduced by 500,000 hours.
“Changing out the lamps and thelighting was a critical piece of thepuzzle,” Erickson said. “It gave us themomentum we needed to moveforward with the bathroom remodel.”
The $4 million bathroom remodelwas perhaps the most significantundertaking as far as sustainableefforts go at the Heathman. Ericksoncalled it amazing and suggested thatthe remodel repositioned the hotel as amodel of sustainability.
“The bathroom undertaking washuge — a giant and a big success,”Erickson said. “One hundred fiftybathrooms were remodeled, and only 1percent of that waste went to thelandfill. To me, that is a great story. Itwins us business, increases employeemorale and reduces the carbon travelfootprint.”
Partnering with Ankrom MoisanAssociated Architects, Heathmanrecycled, re-purposed and reusedapproximately 99 percent of the oldfixtures and waste from the bathroomremodel — most of which was donatedto Portland's ReBuilding Center, anon-profit building materials resourcein North America. The teak trim,mirrors, stone vanities and tubs wereretouched and reused. Certified woodthat adheres to all sustainable buildingpractices was purchased from theForest Stewardship Council. The newshower heads reduce gas consumptionby 10 to 20 percent, and the new toiletsreduce water consumption by half.Thetile, which was installed on the wallsand the floor, is made of 40 percentrecycled material.
“Those little, tiny things make adifference,” Erickson said. “Wepartnered with local businesses thatwere small enough to understand ourneeds, to work with us and to findproducts that were more sustainable.”
Once the bathrooms had beenupdated, Viking Energy Services,building energy analysts, with helpfrom the Energy Trust of OregonExisting Buildings Program, assistedthe Heathman Hotel in prioritizingthe potential energy savings projectsand mechanical systems upgrades.
The hotel then upgraded the guestroom HVAC and the temperaturecontrol system, saving approximately11,893 therms and 281,930 kWh.Based on Viking Energy Servicesenergy analysis, four domestic hotwater boilers, one heating hot water
boiler and the entire water cooledchiller plant were replaced bymechanical contractors HunterDavisson, American Heating andHVAC, Inc. The Energy Trust ofOregon also helped subsidize theenergy-saving projects by providingsubstantial financial incentive, basedon estimated annual energy savings, tooffset project costs. The new boilerswill increase the hot water heatingefficiency and domestic hot waterefficiency by 15 to 20 percent, savingan estimated 15,963 therms, while thenew water cooled carrier chiller plantis expected to save an estimated244,380 kWh annually. Ericksonestimated the return on investment,after receiving Energy Trust ofOregon incentive, on the boilers andHVAC system to be approximatelyfive years and on the chiller plant to beabout six years.
“Since 2006, it's been a pleasureworking with the Heathman Hotel,Mr. Erickson and his staff to improvetheir HVAC and mechanical systemsand reduce their hotel's energyconsumption,” said David Lee,principal at Viking Energy Services.“They have been very receptive tocompleting the energy savingsprojects that we have recommended,and in a way that hasn't reallyimpacted regular hotel operations.Additionally, we are looking forwardto helping them achieve the EnergyStar Label for the hotel.”
Erickson is also pleased with theresults.
“We are going to have this
equipment for the next 20 years,”
Erickson said. “It is part of the ethos of
who we are, part of the culture of this
hotel. Our responsibility is to bring
money to the bottom line. Being green
and being Green Seal Certified helps
us achieve our guest revenue goals and
our bottom line goals as well.”
Bluevine Studio, which specializes
in sourcing materials and furnishings
for green remodeling projects, worked
with Heathman Hotel in remodeling
the Tea Court, Hotel Library and team
member break room and restroom
continued on page 18
Deconstruction is an affordable
and sustainable alternative to
conventional demolition. It is
often defined as the “selective
disassembly of a building structure in
reverse order of assembly, usually by
hand, to maximize the recovery of used
materials for reuse.”
Construction and demolition debris
constitutes an estimated 25-30 percent
of waste stream and upwards of 60-75
percent of those materials can be reused
or recycled. Deconstruction significantly
reduces that waste, achieves reuse and
recycling and minimizes the impact on a
region’s natural resources.
Working mostly by hand, skilled
deconstruction crews can salvage for
reuse up to 85 percent of a building’s
major components. Nearly 100 percent
of the construction debris from the
former bathrooms at the Heathman
Hotel (155 bathrooms in total) was
donated to Portland's Rebuilding
Center.
Since deconstruction generates far
less waste than mechanical demolition,
it’s the ideal method for helping projects
achieve sustainability. Environmentally
responsible, it captures the embodied
energy already inherent in the salvaged
materials and resources, thereby
preserving natural resources for future
generations. Unlike demolition, it
doesn’t require the use of massive
amounts of water to control dust and
particulate matter from rising up into
the air. Since the building doesn’t have
to be watered down while being
deconstructed, hazardous pollutants
aren’t being washed into the storm water
system,eventually making their way into
and damaging the local watershed.
Deconstruction is affordable and
price competitive with mechanized
demolition, particularly when the
potential tax benefits are considered.
Many deconstruction firms nationwide
either are non-profits or partner with
501(c)(3) non-profit recycling centers.
Clients working with firms such as these
will receive a tax-deductible receipt and
documentation for all materials salvaged
and donated to these charitable
organizations. This offers the potential
of substantial tax deductions for the
donated building materials, which can
significantly offset costs of
deconstruction while making a
difference in the community.
Equally important, deconstruction
creates green jobs. Deconstruction
provides an estimated six to eight more
worker days at a living wage than
standard demolition. At a time when
leaders are desperately seeking ways to
rejuvenate the economy and grow jobs,
responsible re-purposing of built
environments can lead the way.
Deconstruction can help a project
qualify for the U.S. Green Building
Council’s LEED Certification. It also
earns remodelers points on green
remodeling projects under the NAHB
Model Green Home Building
using sustainable products for thefurnishings and new design features.Eco-friendly flooring, made of pre-consumer and post consumer recyclingmaterials, was used in the remodel.The cabinets and tables were re-purposed and resurfaced. The lightingwas replaced with more energy-efficient bulbs. Additionally, all itemsthat were not used were carefullysorted for recycling.
“We re-purposed as much as wecould,” said Kat James, principal ofBluevine Studio. “We wanted tomodernize — bring things up to date.I think we were really successful.”
The sustainable practicesimplemented at the Heathman Hotelwere successful enough to earn thehotel Green Seal Silver Certificationin February 2011.
Erickson is quite pleased with the
direction the hotel is headed. He
attests that every improvement to the
facility during the last five years has
helped to make the hotel a better place
— especially in terms of sustainability.
Part of the process was overcoming the
challenges of updating a nearly
century-old building to make it energy
efficient.
“If we can change our best practices
and our building, using the shell of a
1920s building, into a green,
sustainable, future-oriented business,
there is no excuse for any other
business not to follow suit,” Erickson
said.
Other best practices that have been
implemented at the hotel included
food composting and the use of Green
Seal Certified cleaning products and
recycled soap and shampoo. Erickson
meets regularly with Viking Energy
Services, helping the hotel stay on
track to become the first Energy Star
labeled hotel in Oregon.
“It may take a little bit more time to
do the right thing,” Erickson said. “But
it is a lot easier than it was five or 10
years ago to move in the right direction
and be green.”
As a Four Diamond hotel that
offers a full-service restaurant with
private dining and catering space, the
commitment at the Heathman Hotel
to sustainability reflects on the
community of Portland, which is
known as one of the greenest cities in
America.
“We are always promoting our city
as the greenest destination in the
United States,” Erickson said. “We
own that particular brand. And if
Oregon businesses can continue to
collaborate together, we will continue
to be the top choice for green meetings
in the United States.” OF
continued from page 17
18 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Deconstruction Wise Alternative to DemolitionBy Douglas Lichter
Guideline, a helpful tool remodelers can
use when planning a deconstruction and
remodeling project.
Deconstruction crews remove
building materials from kitchens and
bathrooms for smaller remodeling
projects, while most experienced firms
will hand dismantle anything: sheds,
garages, porches, decks, complete
houses, barns, commercial, even
industrial buildings.
The deconstruction of the
Heathman Hotel bathrooms and suites
presented some unique challenges not
typically encountered on a standard
project. It came with all the
commensurate challenges a contractor
experiences in any urban setting:
parking and site logistics issues.
The hotel sits in the heart of a dense,
urban setting and shares an internal
driveway with the adjoining performing
arts center, the Schnitzer Hall. In thiscase, the deconstruction crews had tocontend with the quality of experiencefor hotel guests while transportingmaterials up and down floors. Quietneeded to be maintained until 10 a.m. soas not to disturb guests on adjoiningfloors, shortening the work daysignificantly. In addition, the onlyfreight elevator in the building exists ina bustling kitchen on the way to theinterior driveway alley where off loadswere placed for salvaged materials anddebris. Since dinner preparations beginmid-afternoon, the afternoon wasequally circumscribed, therebyshortening the effective workday to only
five hours.
While the property presented some
challenges to the deconstruction crews,
management at the Heathman couldn't
be more pleased with the sustainability
practices accomplished through the
deconstruction process. Essentially,
deconstruction and recycling can
occasionally take more time and effort
than demolition, but the many benefits
outweigh the minor challenges.
Douglas Lichter is the deconstruction services
manager for the ReBuilding Center of Our
United Villages. He can be reached at
503.331.9875 or [email protected].
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 19
Photo courtesy of John Valls Photography
ECO-REMODELFACTS ANDFIGURES:• 50 percent less water consumption in
the guest rooms
• 20 percent less gas usage fromshowerheads
• Diverted 15 tons of debris from landfills
• 99 percent landfill-free remodel
• Used a Caribbean teak wood certified bythe Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)which has a paper trail documentingsustainable forestry practice from the dayit was planted until harvest, in accordancewith the Smartwood Rainforest Alliance
• 40 percent recycled tile suited tohotelier’s needs: quiet installation, nodemolition (The Heathman Hotel is thefirst company to install this tile in theUnited States.)
• Allowed preservation of original teak trim,stone vanities and tubs
• Custom designed low-energyLED lighting
• Employed 13 local vendors
20 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Our company’s definition of
sustainable design differs
from that of mainstream
architecture,” says Mike Iannone,
manufacturer’s representative for
modular interior wall solutions. “The
design community focuses on energy
conservation and recycled content, but
to sustain means to stay in use.
Conventional interiors have a limited
life cycle and are, by definition, the
antithesis of sustainability.”
The average life cycle for a standard
commercial building interior is 54
months and for retail, 20 months,
according to Iannone. A study by the
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency revealed that for every square
foot of sheet rock installed in new
construction, one pound of drywall
ends up as garbage. Roughly 28 to 30
percent of landfills consist of
construction, demolition and
renovation waste.
Conventional drywall construction
is an environmentally damaging cycle
of building, demolition, disposal and
rebuilding. Modular interior wall
companies redefine sustainable
building interiors by manufacturing
cutting-edge, environmentally-
friendly solutions that are built to last.
“Reducing and reusing are the best
ways to maximize sustainability,” says
Iannone. “Recycling actually has a
large carbon footprint. You need fuel
to transport the existing materials and
convert them into something new.”
Along with their distribution
partners, modular wall companies
create customized, productive spaces as
long-term solutions for a client’s
continually evolving needs. Many
modular wall solutions are an
adaptable kit of parts that reconfigure
easily and efficiently. A wide range of
standard and custom options gives
individuals exactly what they want
while maintaining a consistent overall
look and feel.
“Designers love modular interior walls
because they can control the aesthetic as
well as the ever-changing function,” says
Taylor Finlay of Environments in
Portland, a modular wall distribution
partner. “They love giving clients the
ability to change any wall into what it
Company Manufactures Cutting-Edge, Environmentally-FriendlyModular Solutions that are Built to LastBy Amanda Gilchrist
“
needs to be five years from now.”
Conventional construction often
forces tenants to lease more square
footage than necessary to
accommodate inevitable future
changes. The adaptability of modular
walls allows clients to maximize their
existing space, integrating freely with
the base building.
Select modular walls are freely
compatible with other manufacturers’
furniture, millwork, electrical and
plumbing. By using a modular interior
solution, building managers don’t have
to worry about disrupting asbestos or
compromising aesthetics and function.
Revolutionary technology helps
modular wall companies achieve some
of the shortest lead times in the
industry. One company uses an
advanced design platform, an object-
oriented software loaded with specific
product information. It streamlines the
order process, increases productivity
and drastically reduces error margin.
“When I’m designing a project, the
design platform gives me
comprehensive pricing, shop drawings,
AutoCAD files and a bill of materials
for sign-off and order entry,” says
Finlay. “When I complete the design
work, I send the electronic files to the
manufacturer, and it’s a pretty quick
turnaround to get my order
acknowledged with a ship date. They
use the electronic information to
immediately start manufacturing the
parts in their factory.”
Designing in software
automatically creates an interactive 3D
interface, a powerful communication
tool. Using patented video game
technology, the program creates
graphic, real-time elevations that give
clients a detailed visual mock-up of
their interior solution. Changes are
easily made and submitted for review.
Because the image is the order, clients
don’t have to wait for custom product
engineering.
“The manufacturer automatically
generates a list of parts and installation
drawings when the order ships,” says
Finlay. “It saves so much time. I don’t
have to spend three days updatingfloor plans and tagging each tile. Theinstallers get the drawings, we’re alllooking at the same thing, and weknow it’s accurate.”
Though potential clients see theenvironmental benefits of modularwalls, they often assume the cost issignificantly higher, which isn’t thecase. Additionally, modular walls offera huge tax savings over traditionaldrywall construction, as they fall intothe same category as office furniture.Furniture depreciates over a seven-yearschedule as opposed to conventionallyconstructed interiors, which depreciateover a 39-year schedule. Recent taxlaws currently allow for 100 percent offirst-year depreciation.
“If a for-profit company in Oregonspends $1 million on a modular interiorsolution, the first year tax write-off hasa cash value of about $400,000, or 40
percent of the purchase price,” saysIannone. “It’s like getting a subsidy forchoosing modular walls.”
Traditional construction might seemlike the cheapest way to build a wall, butnot when you look at the big picture.Conventional construction projectsoften exceed the initial budget anddeliver late. With a modular interiorsolution, the cost is the same from thestart of the project to the end, and theyoften help reduce construction leadtime by two to three weeks.
“Time is money, and the sooner abusiness can get up and running, themore productive they’ll be in the longrun,” says Iannone.
Amanda Gilchrist is a project managerat Environments, a distribution partnerfor DIRTT modular solutions. She canbe reached at 503.963.6205 [email protected]. OF
interiors
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 21
Photos courtesy of DIRTT modular solutions
For most people, efficiency can’t be
seen. Telling how efficient a
building is just by being inside it is
hard. Most commercial building dwellers
can’t detect subtle shifts in temperature
setpoints, let alone tell a building’s energy
performance by looking at it. If it were
easy to see the amount of energy being
wasted in most commercial buildings on
a daily basis — like piles of money flying
out of the building on cold nights, hot
days and long weekends when the
building is empty — then energy
measurement and verification would be
top of mind and agenda.
By contrast, operating budget
excess is easy to see. Energy comprises
a third of most buildings’ controllable
operating costs. Now that owners and
managers are learning that just low-
and no-cost energy efficiency measures
alone can reduce their annual energy
spend by an average of 15 percent.
They are having facility managers run
energy saving diagnostics to uncover
big savings from simple fixes.
However, these types of savings
opportunities typically revert back
without rigorous oversight on the part
of the facilities staff. After diagnosing
and changing your systems, how do
you know if your energy-saving
adjustments are working? And what
do you do if they aren’t?
New, affordable methods are
increasingly available to help. Ongoing
energy measurement and verification
services, known as “M&V” in the
industry, prove that predicted savings
from proposed energy conservation
measures are happening (or not)
through scientific measurement.
Energy measurement and verification
helps facility managers bridge this gap
of invisibility by providing real time
data that help to ensure the delivery of
monthly savings. As facility managers
feel increasing pressure from
management to reduce utility bills,
they’ll need data to show and prove
savings from actions taken to reduce
energy usage.
What is energy measurementand verification?
Energy measurement and
verification is the ongoing, continuous
monitoring of a building’s energy use
over time, tracked and analyzed by
sensors, software and consultants who
interpret the data. Many call it the
equivalent of adding a 24/7 energy
expert to building management staff to
continuously watch the energy use of
the facility and tell facility managers
when they are saving money or wasting
it. If it is paired with cost-cutting
recommendations from the system and
energy analysts, it goes beyond making
the facility manager’s job easier to
making that person look like a hero.
Building conditions and tenants are
in constant flux. From weather
conditions to interior office and cubicle
rearrangements, energy management is
Turning Invisible Efficiency Measuresinto Visible SavingsEnergy Measurement and Verification ServicesMeasure the ‘Invisible’ for Facility ManagersBy Jim Crowder
22 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
a moving target. Measurement and
verification allows the potential for
instant adjustment should building
conditions change, tracking how much
energy is being saved as a result of
changes on a day-to-day basis.
How does it work?The most effective measurement
and verification systems stay quiet
when building systems are functioning
optimally, constantly looking for data
that is out of the expected range for
that building and quickly identifying
the most serious energy waste. Real-
time alerts are issued when energy use
exceeds baselines. Continuous
monitoring allows energy analysts to
identify changes in building efficiency
as they happen and make immediate
corrections to avoid unnecessary costs.
Most measurement and verification
services use sensors to collect energy
usage through an interface to the
building’s electric meter. Those pulse
measurements are sent wirelessly to a
server, where the data is collected.
When run through a sophisticated
software platform, that data can be
analyzed and presented via a real time
energy dashboard or reports. The
information is then reviewed by an
energy analyst, and recommendations
can be made when opportunities to
save energy are identified.
Measurement and verification
provides the information needed for
executive leadership to ensure energy
waste is eliminated in their buildings
leading to lower operating costs.
Measurement and verification inpractice
Generally, facility managers’
demanding schedules and breadth of
oversight aren’t best suited to day-to-
day measurement of continuous data.
But with energy costs inevitably on the
rise, facility managers (and their
managers) will want to keep a watchful
eye over every dollar.
As facility managers know, energy
management isn’t a one-time event.
Energy waste and cost control require
continuous monitoring, analysis and
management. To simplify those tasks,
one of the most important tools in the
effort to improve buildings’ energy
efficiency is to solve the difficulty of
eliminating waste with a robust energy
measurement and verification system.
Jim Crowder is president
and CEO of AirAdvice,
an industry-proven,
energy services delivery
platform. Read more
about AirAdvice at
www.airadvice.com. OF
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 23
building controls
24 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Data CenterWorks with
Energy Trustof Oregonto ImproveEfficiency
By Susan Jowaiszas
A s a managed hosting and
colocation services provider,EasyStreet Online Services has
delivered secure IT infrastructuresolutions since 1995. Known for itsexpert technical support, the company isalso recognized for its environmentalfocus, including its use of 100 percentclean wind power purchased from itselectric utility,Portland General Electric.
In 2009, Energy Trust of Oregonconducted an energy study ofEasyStreet’s Beaverton, Oregon, datacenter to establish an operational usagebaseline and discover possibleefficiency improvements the companycould apply to its facility. The studyidentified airflow managementstrategies that made technological andfinancial sense for EasyStreet’s facility— and qualified for Energy Trustincentives, as well.
The data center is a grid of aisleswith nearly 200 cabinets containingequipment owned by colocationcustomers. Using thermal imaging,computational fluid dynamicsmodeling and expert analysis,EasyStreet was able to identify hotspots in both the older and newer areasof the data center, indicating thefacility needed better airflowmanagement.
The first step in the airflow projectinvolved determining the leastdisruptive layout that would allow forhot and cold air management —keeping the area at a stabletemperature is essential for reliable,uninterrupted performance.
EasyStreet thoroughlycommunicated with customers aboutupcoming changes and coordinatedthe necessary moves, which includedaligning all the servers so the air-intake sides faced front into the “coldaisles” and the heat-exhaust sides facedback to the “hot aisles.” Managingcables and blocking cabinet gaps withblanking panels also improved bypassairflow.
The next step was to move the coldair into the right areas. EasyStreetcontracted with Protemp Associates of
Portland to install diffusers on the airhandlers to direct the cold air into thecorrect aisles.
Finally, Weaver Technologies ofTigard used AirBlock componentsfrom Simplex to create caps over thetop of the hot aisles, extending themall the way to the air handlers. Aspecial feature of the cap designensures the caps will drop open toexpose the existing fire suppressionsystem if needed.
Once the containment componentswere in place, the air handlers weretuned so they operate steadily andefficiently, rather than in bursts of“short cycling” (running for a shorterperiod of time than it should). At first,it was challenging to match the airhandlers to the temperaturefluctuations, but now with the rightconfiguration, EasyStreet has takentwo of six units offline.
With all of these improvements inplace, the data center is maintainingstable intake temperatures below itstarget of 74 degrees. Measurementsshow fewer than five degrees per hourvariance, which is exceptional byindustry standards. With Energy Trustincentives, EasyStreet expects an 18-month payback on the project.
“Data center operators might bewary of touching their existingsystems,” said Rich Bader, presidentand CEO of EasyStreet. “It seems liketrying to fix a jet engine midair. Wecan say it’s both possible andworthwhile to do. The net resultexceeded our expectations in terms ofenergy reductions.”
Energy Trust of Oregon is anindependent non-profit organizationdedicated to helping utility customersbenefit from saving energy and tappingrenewable resources. Their work helpskeep energy costs as low as possible.Learn more at www.energytrust.org orcall 1.866.368.7878. OF
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 25
utilities
PROJECT-AT-A-GLANCE
Project Benefits• Reduced energy use and costs• Lowered average
temperatures, increasingstability
• Improved conditions forservers and air conditioningequipment
• Maintained functionality of firesuppression system
Equipment Installed• Diffusers on air handling
system• AirBlock isolation components
from SimplexFinancial Analysis• $131,885 project cost• $65,942 Energy Trust incentive• $35,121 estimated annual
energy cost savings• 524,187 estimated annual
kilowatt hours saved
26 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Green technology innovation
is thriving in this economy as
businesses look for cost and
energy saving strategies to enhance
efficiency and sustainability into the
future. According to the Energy
Information Administration, U.S.
buildings use more than 70 percent of
the country’s electricity and consume
nearly 40 percent of its energy (Green
Building Alliance, 2010). Compared to
standard buildings, green buildings
have been shown to lower maintenance
costs by more than 10 percent, reduce
energy use more than 25 percent and
significantly increase occupant
satisfaction (Green Building Alliance,
2010).
Building owners and managers
nationwide seek to renovate and
improve their buildings’ energy use
with innovation in green building
design, workplace design and property
management. Programs such as the
federal Energy Star program or the
U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED
rating system (Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design) encourage
the adoption of green building and
development practices by creating a
recognized benchmark for design,
construction and operation. For
example, the LEED standard for
existing buildings encourages facility
managers and building owners to
address issues of improved air quality
for occupants, lower water use, greater
recycling efforts, reduction of toxic
materials and lower overall operational
and maintenance costs. According to
Thomas L. Friedman’s Hot, Flat and
Crowded, studies show that occupancy,
rental rates and sale prices are higher in
LEED-Certified buildings than in
conventional ones.
An innovation to be protectable
under patent law may consist of a new
and useful process, machine or
composition of matter, or any new and
useful improvement thereof. Those
concepts may include innovations for
sustainable site development, water
savings, energy efficiency, materials
selection and indoor environmental
quality improvement. As owners and
managers seek to squeeze opportunities
for improved efficiency out of everyday
activities and processes, innovation in
construction and management of
facilities may be fertile ground for
patent protection. If you have
conceived of such innovations, you may
be able to seek patent or other
intellectual property protection in order
to monetize the innovations through
licensing or other means.
In a recent decision, Bilski v.
Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3218 ( June 28,
2010), the U.S. Supreme Court
clarified that innovative processes and
business methods may still be eligible
for protection under the Patent Act.
The Patent Act, 35 United States
Code § 1-376, governs the issuance of
patents. The Patent Act defines four
patent eligible categories: “whoever
invents or discovers any new and useful
process, machine, manufacture or
composition of matter, or any new and
useful improvement thereof, may
obtain a patent.” (35 U.S.C. §101). A
“process”under the Act, is defined as an
“art or method, and includes a new use
of a known process, machine,
manufacture, composition of matter or
material,” (35 U.S.C. §100(b)). A
business method is a specific type of
“process,” an orderly procedure, a
regular way or manner, a method of
doing business.
What processes, business methods,
are eligible for patent protection?
In 2008, a landmark Federal Circuit
decision suggested that a process is
eligible for patent protection “only if it
is tied to a particular machine or
transforms an article into a different
state or thing;” this was known as the
“machine-or-transformation” test (In re
Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 954 (Fed. Cir.
2008)). The machine-or-transforma-
tion test effectively narrowed the broad
statute; the Patent Office began to
reject patent applications and district
courts began to strike down existing
patents on innovative processes.
In 2010, however, the decision was
reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3218
( June 28, 2010), the U.S. Supreme
Court analyzed the rigid machine-or-
transformation test, and found that
while the test is a “useful and important
clue, and investigative tool,” it is “not
the sole test for deciding whether an
invention is a patent-eligible process,”
(Bilski, 130 S.Ct. at 3227). The Court
also clarified the law on business
method patents, finding that business
methods may fall within the scope of
“processes” eligible for protection under
the Patent Act. Finally, the Court
emphasized that clear limitations
remain — “In order to receive patent
protection, any claimed invention must
be novel, non-obvious and fully and
particularly described,” (See Id. at
3228).The invention or discovery must
be more than an abstract idea alone; an
Protect Your Green InnovationBuilding Owners Discover and Patent New Waysto Use Energy More EfficientlyBy Victor Pollak and Artemis Vamianakis
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 27
abstract idea that is applied to a known
structure or process, however, may be
well deserving of patent protection (Id.
at 3230).
What does this mean? The Court
did not adopt categorical rules on what
specific business methods would be
patent eligible, lending to what may
be, an unpredictable future. For now,
however, Bilski stands for the
possibility that processes described as
business methods may be eligible for
patent protection.
Accordingly, as building owners and
managers discover new ways to use
energy more efficiently, they may be in
a unique position to harness
innovation in everyday processes into
patentable technology and to then
monetize the technology through
licensing or other means. It may be
worth your while to consult patent
counsel to explore whether patent
protection may be available for your
innovations.
Victor Pollak, an attorney/shareholder at
Fabian Law, concentrates in corporate
and securities matters for businesses and
their owners, including those engaged in
technology commercialization. Artemis
Vamianakis, an associate attorney at
Fabian Law, has experience in a variety
of legal f ields including business
organization, energy and utilities,
natural resources and real property. They
can be reached at 801.531.8900 or
real estate law
28 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Oftentimes, project teams dive
into a LEED for ExistingBuildings Operations and
Maintenance (LEED EBOM)certification effort without fullyunderstanding all the factors that willaffect their success. Challenges includesetting realistic goals and objectives,dedicating enough time and humanresources to the effort andunderstanding how to budget for it. Bythinking through several key questionsbefore embarking on LEED EBOMcertification effort, you can expect asmoother process that ultimatelymeets your intended goals.
Before considering these questions,a bit of background: The U.S. GreenBuildings Council’s (USGBC) LEEDEBOM rating system gives buildingowners and facility managers theopportunity to develop and implementa robust program that moves theirproperty toward a more sustainableoperations platform. Once in place, athird party evaluates the implementedprogram for its accomplishments.Depending on the number of strategiesimplemented, one of four ratingcertification levels can be awarded:Certified, Silver, Gold or Platinum.
For some buildings that are welldown the green operations path, thecertification exercise is less complex interms of adapting their existingpractices to the LEED requirements,setting up tracking parameters andpreparing the certification submittalfor evaluation. For other buildings, theLEED EBOM program will requiremore in-depth changes to theiroperational practices and culture.Certification will depend on a morestructured approach that producesgreater buy-in and change from avariety of the building’s operationsteam members.
Here are several questions any
project team should be asking beforetackling LEED EBOM certification:
Certification is sought for amultitude of reasons. The mostcommon goals are marketdifferentiation of the property throughthe certification’s branding, operationalcost savings through high-performance operations and reducingthe environmental impacts of buildingoperations.
Understanding the motivations orgoals driving this effort has bearing onits success. Maybe the building ownerswish to use the certification system toreduce the building’s operations. Orthey saw the building down the streetachieve certification and now feel theirbuilding requires Gold-levelcertification to stay competitive in theleasing market. Perhaps they see theprocess as a way to cut operatingexpenses.
By understanding these motivationsand clearly articulating the goals anddesired outcomes, the propertymanagers and building engineers canbetter streamline, focus and direct theirLEED EBOM strategies.
The costs associated with a LEED
EBOM certification effort will most
likely be an unknown before the
project begins. Many teams start their
projects with an investigational
(assessment) phase where each LEED
EBOM credit strategy is explored for
costs upfront and in on-going
operations. Teams will be better able
to create a preliminary credit strategy
and determine whether to target high-
cost credits by understanding at the
onset whether (and how much) money
for LEED EBOM may be available
from a one-time capital expense
budget, from on-going operational
budgets or a mixture of the two
categories.
LEED EBOM isn’t free. If an
organization is willing to explore and
budget for strategies that may have
little or no return on investment but
align well with aggressive goals and
overall objectives, the team is freer to
assess its strategy options in more
depth. However, if budgets are tight
and at least $50,000 to $100,000 isn’t
available, the team may need to
reconsider the pursuit of certification.
It may be better to just use LEED
EBOM as a framework for
implementing a few new green
operational strategies. We have seen
projects achieve certification on
smaller budgets, but this is more the
exception than the rule.
In parallel, the budget question
should also be analyzed from a timing
perspective. Teams will want to
determine whether the organization’s
budgeting cycle aligns with the
ownership’s timeline goals for
achieving certification or whether
funds need to be pulled from other
budget categories to fast-track the
process.
ONE1Why does a building need
this certif ication, and what
are the desired outcomes
from this effort?
TWO2How much tolerance isthere for costs associatedwith this effort, when willbudget be available andwhere will it come from?
THREEBy Eric Baxter
Critical Success Factors of a LEED
Sometimes the top-down mandate toachieve certification doesn’t fullyconsider the human resources element asa primary success factor. Internal teamchampions must be willing to step up,and they must be provided time withintheir busy schedules to facilitate theoperational changes to satisfy eachprerequisite requirement and targetedLEED EBOM credit.
Also, assess whether your internalteam has the expertise and learningability to undertake this effort. A teamthat is rapidly overwhelmed by thedetailed complexity of the rating systemsrequirements will lead to a stagnatedcertification effort, wasted valuablehuman capital and, perhaps worst of all,an uncertified project.
If these questions have youscratching your head or at least thinkingabout your original certification plandifferently, you might benefit from anindependent set of eyes and ears.Asking for outside help isn’t a sign ofweakness. In fact, it may lead tocertification program planning thatidentifies more and better opportunitiesand more robust outcomes.
Eric Baxter is the Existing Buildingsgroup director at BrightworksSustainability Advisors. He can bereached at [email protected] 503.290.3000. OF
THREE3Who will direct the LEEDEBOM certification effortand what involvement willbe required both internallyfrom the buildingmanagement/operationsteam and from externalparties such as contractors,suppliers and consultants?
EBOM Project
30 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Portland General Electrichas more renewable powercustomers than any otherutility in the United States.That’s according to theDepartment of Energy’s NationalRenewable Energy Laboratory(NREL), which released its annualrankings of the nation’s top utilitygreen pricing programs.
At the end of 2010, PGE hadnearly 78,000 business andresidential renewable customers,or 12.6 percent of its eligiblecustomers, enrolled in a PGErenewable power program, whichis well over the national averageof 2 percent participation rate forother utilities.
This marks the secondconsecutive year PGE hasreceived NREL’s No. 1 ranking fornumber of business andresidential renewable powercustomers. PGE also continues tohold NREL’s top spot for sellingmore renewable power toresidential customers than anyother utility in the United States.
“Our customers again have provenOregon continues to be a leader inrenewable energy andsustainability,” said Carol Dillin, vicepresident, customers andeconomic development, PGE. “Ourcustomers tell us every day theywant choices when deciding how topower their homes and businessesand many choose renewablepower. We are very proud of that.”
Separately, NREL released lists ofthe top 10 national Utility GreenPower Programs in five categoriesbased on 2010 data. PGE’shighlights include:
Renewable Energy Sales. For thesixth consecutive year, PGEmaintained its No. 1 ranking ofrenewable energy sales toresidential customers, and alsoholds the No. 2 ranking of total
renewable energy sales toresidential and commercialcustomers combined. PGEcustomers purchased more than735 million kilowatt hours (kWh) ofrenewable energy in 2010, whichis equivalent to the entire output ofa 250-megawatt wind farm.
Customer Participation Rate. PGEheld on to the No. 2 position in thenation for the percentage ofcustomers who purchase arenewable power option. At theend of 2010, PGE had 12.6percent of eligible customerspurchasing a renewable poweroption.
NREL rankings are based on rawnumbers for calendar year 2010and are not adjusted for the sizeof the utility. The full report can beaccessed atwww.greenpower.energy.gov.
While many school districtsaround the state facebudget cuts and toughdecisions, the future looksbrighter for Dallas SchoolDistrict. In 2010, McKinstry, afull-service, design-build-operate-and-maintain firm specializing inconsulting, construction, energyand facility services, retrofitted allfive of the Dallas School Districtschools using an Energy SavingsPerformance Contract (ESPC). Ayear later, the district is nowsaving an estimated $100,000annually — enough energy fromthese improvements that theschool district budget committeewas able to decrease the 2011-12natural gas budget by $93,000.
Performance contracting enablesschool districts to replace agingequipment with modern, energy-and resource-efficient technologies.The capital investment to make theimprovements is paid for throughthe savings created over a setperiod, and the energy service
company that installs theimprovements contractuallyguarantees a combination ofsavings on energy consumptionand improved system performance.
“Our partnership with McKinstryhas enabled us to not only savemoney and conserve energy, butto improve the learningenvironments of our schools,” saidChristy Perry, superintendent ofDallas School District. “Had wenot replaced our inefficient boilersin all five schools, the Districtwould be paying nearly $100,000more next year to heat ourfacilities. Instead, we will be ableto redirect these dollars back intothe classrooms.”
Completed in 2010, the facilitiesbond allowed the installation ofnew boilers in all schools,numerous lighting upgrades,steam trap repairs, new controls inmost schools and various HVACimprovements. In addition to thesavings realized by these projects,the improvements created newconstruction jobs in the state andspurred the local economy.McKinstry worked with 10 otherlocal and regional companies tocomplete the Dallas schoolmodernizations on time and onbudget.
In addition to the ESPC, McKinstryalso assisted Dallas in securing$400,000 in incentives, $85,000 intax credits and $715,000 in grantfunding through Oregon’s StateEnergy Program (ARRA Funded)in order to pay for many of thefacility upgrades.
The Building Owners and ManagersAssociation (BOMA) Internationalannounced that 53 new buildingshave been conferred with the BOMA360 designation in the first quarter of2011. The new class of BOMA360 Buildings includes theOHSU Center for Health and
BRIEFLY
OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011 I 31
Healing in Portland, Oregon, whichis owned by RIMCO, LLC, andmanaged by CB Richard Ellis.
The BOMA 360 PerformanceProgram is a program designed torecognize commercial propertiesthat demonstrate best practices inbuilding operations andmanagement. Since the program’sinception in spring 2009, more than230 buildings have beendesignated, and the momentumcontinues to grow.
According to a recent studyconducted by Kingsley Associates,buildings with the BOMA 360Performance Program designationhave higher tenant satisfactionscores in 47 out of 50 categoriesrelating to tenant relations comparedto commercial office buildingswithout the designation. A survey ofdesignees that have held thedesignation for a year or longer alsoshowed that BOMA 360 buildingshave achieved operational savings,developed new policies andprocedures to improve operationalefficiencies and successfullycompeted for new tenants becauseof their designation.
"As the economic recovery starts togain footing, the BOMA 360designation is proving to be avaluable tool for propertyprofessionals looking to enhancecommercial building asset values,"noted BOMA International ChairRay H. Mackey, Jr., partner andchief operating officer, StreamRealty Partners, L.P. “By earning theBOMA 360 designation, these newdesignees have proven that theyhave the critical operations andmanagement best practices in placethat are necessary to thrive intoday’s marketplace."
The BOMA 360 PerformanceProgram evaluates properties on sixmajor areas of building management:building operations andmanagement; life safety/security/risk
management; training and education;energy; environment/sustainability;and tenant relations/communityinvolvement. The comprehensivenature of the BOMA 360Performance Program means thatevery aspect of building performanceis assessed, and scores are basedon how buildings meet an extensivechecklist of best practices.
Construction on the $139million project to transformthe Edith Green/WendellWyatt Federal Building indowntown Portland hasbegun. Funded under theAmerican Recovery andReinvestment Act, the modernizedfacility is designed to achieve thehighest level of green buildingcertification, LEED Platinum, fromthe U.S. Green Building Council forits use of cutting-edge sustainabledesign and technology. Additionally,the project will demonstrate howpublic and private buildingsconstructed in the 1960's and1970's can be retrofitted to meetnew resource-conserving standards.
The Edith Green/Wendell WyattFederal Building in downtownPortland is a 35-year-olddeteriorating facility at the end of itseconomic life, but still a viable andneeded federal asset. Major buildingcomponents and systems, such asthe electrical and HVAC system, areunreliable and not able to meetmodern performance demands. Thebuilding does not meet currentsecurity, Americans with DisabilitiesAct (AD), and seismic standardsthat would be able to supportagency missions in the future.
This project is primarily amodernization. GSA is replacingbuilding components that havereached the end of their operatinglife. This project will turn EdithGreen/Wendell Wyatt into one of thepremier environmentally-friendlybuildings in the nation and establish
GSA as a green proving ground forinnovative green-buildingtechniques.
Building enhancements include:
• Replacement and upgrades to thebuilding’s accessibility, life safety,mechanical, electrical andsecurity systems;
• A 50 percent reduction in lightingenergy usage through advanced,optically-enhanced light systemsthat automatically adjust to theamount of daylight available;
• A 60-65 percent reduction inpotable water consumptionthrough the use of low-flowfixtures and reuse of rainwater fortoilets, urinals, irrigation andmechanical cooling;
• Modernized elevators thatregenerate power as theydescend;
• A solar array on the roof to offsetup to 6 percent of building energyconsumption, with solar powerproduced on-site; and
• Unique energy-saving treatmentsto each of the building’s four sides,including light reflectors to providedaylight in occupied areas, shadingfins to keep heat out during thesummer and a vertical screen toprovide shade and cooling in thesummer for the west façade.
GSA was appropriated more than$5.5 billion under the Recovery Actto convert federal facilities into high-performance green buildings andconstruct energy-efficient federalbuildings, courthouses and landports of entry. In addition to creatingjobs, these projects will deliverlasting progress toward building amore sustainable nationalinfrastructure while reducing thefederal government’s consumptionof energy and water and increasingthe use of clean and renewablesources of energy.
32 I OREGON FACILITIES SUMMER 2011
Oregon FacilitiesP. O. Box 970281Orem, UT 84097-0281
CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED