orca-t, a precision treg-engineered donor product ...orca-t standard of care 0 100 200 300 400 0 50...

18
SLIDE 1 Orca-T, a Precision Treg-Engineered Donor Product, Prevents Acute GvHD with Less Immunosuppression in an Early Multicenter Experience with Myeloablative HLA-Matched Transplants. Everett H Meyer, MD, PhD 1 , Rasmus Hoeg, MD 2 , Anna Moroz, MD, PhD 1 , Bryan Xei, BS 1 , Hsin-Hsu Wu, MD 1 , Rahul Pawar 1 , Kartoosh Heydari, MD 1 , David B. Miklos, MD, PhD 1 , Parveen Shiraz, MD 1 , Lori S. Muffly, MD, MS 1 , Sally Arai, MD, MS 1 , Laura J. Johnston, MD 1 , Robert Lowsky, MD, FRCP 1 , Andrew R. Rezvani, MD 1 , Judith A Shizuru, MD, PhD 1 , Wen-Kai Weng, MD, PhD 1 , Nathaniel Fernhoff, PhD 6 , Gerhard Bauer 2 , Arpita Gandhi, MD, MS 3 , Amy Putnam 6 , J. Scott McClellan, MD, PhD 6 , Bronwen E. Shaw, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath 4 , Joseph P. McGuirk, DO 5 , Mehrdad Abedi, MD 2 and Robert S. Negrin, MD 1 1 Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA | 2 Institute For Regenerative Cures (IRC), University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA | 3 Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR | 4 CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI | 5 Department of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS | 6 Orca Bio, Menlo Park, CA

Upload: others

Post on 02-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • SLIDE 1

    Orca-T, a Precision Treg-Engineered Donor Product, Prevents Acute GvHD with Less Immunosuppression in an

    Early Multicenter Experience with Myeloablative HLA-Matched Transplants.

    Everett H Meyer, MD, PhD1, Rasmus Hoeg, MD2, Anna Moroz, MD, PhD1, Bryan Xei, BS1, Hsin-Hsu Wu, MD1, Rahul Pawar1,

    Kartoosh Heydari, MD1, David B. Miklos, MD, PhD1, Parveen Shiraz, MD1, Lori S. Muffly, MD, MS1, Sally Arai, MD, MS1, Laura J.

    Johnston, MD1, Robert Lowsky, MD, FRCP1, Andrew R. Rezvani, MD1, Judith A Shizuru, MD, PhD1, Wen-Kai Weng, MD, PhD1,

    Nathaniel Fernhoff, PhD6, Gerhard Bauer2, Arpita Gandhi, MD, MS3, Amy Putnam6, J. Scott McClellan, MD, PhD6, Bronwen E.

    Shaw, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath4, Joseph P. McGuirk, DO5, Mehrdad Abedi, MD2 and Robert S. Negrin, MD1

    1Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA | 2Institute For Regenerative Cures (IRC),

    University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA | 3Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR | 4CIBMTR (Center for

    International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI | 5Department of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS | 6Orca Bio,

    Menlo Park, CA

  • SLIDE 2

    Conflicts of interest | Everett Meyer, MD, PhD

    Co-founder, scientific advisor

    Co-founder, scientific advisor

    Scientific Advisory Board

    Scientific Advisory Board

    Sponsored Research Support

  • SLIDE 3

    Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) remains a major problem in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

    Day 0: Infusion into Patient

    Day -2: Collection of Donor Cells

    Conventional Graft

    GvHD in HSCTs

    • Donor T-cells drive GVHD pathophysiology

    • 40 years of clinical research to control GVHD by controlling donor T cell

  • SLIDE 4

    GvHD risk with reduced T-cell grafts remains significant

    T-cell reduced grafts

    • Previous studies employing T cell reduction of allografts alone still show significant acute and chronic GVHD with single-agent cyclosporin prophylaxis*

    low

    med

    high

    104 106 108

    T cells per kg

    Ris

    k o

    f G

    vHD No PPX 1-agent PPX insufficient

    T-cell reduced ConventionalT cell depleted

    *Montero et al. BBMT 12:1318-1325 (2006)Nakamura et al. BJH 115:95-104 (2001)

    Barrett et al. BMT 21: 543-551 (1998)

  • SLIDE 5

    Tregs in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    CellProcessing Tcons

    Day +2

    Day 0

    Tregs &HSPCs

    Day 0: Infusion into Patient

    Day -2: Collection of Donor Cells

    Conventional Graft

    Conventional Transplant High-Precision Orca-T

    Day -2: Collection of Donor Cells

    Infusion into Patient

    Eddinger et al. Nature Medicine 2003 Sep;9(9):1144-50. | Trzonkowski et al. Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;133(1):22-6.

    Di Ianni M, et al. Blood. 2011;117(14):3921–3928. | Brunstein, et al. Blood 2016 Feb 127 (8):1044-51. | Kellner H, et al.

    Oncotarget 2018 Nov 2;9(86):35611-35622.

  • SLIDE 6

    Orca-T

    Evaluation of high-precision Orca-T to control GvHD

    Orca-T + 1-agent PPX

    • Yield of Treg from apheresis: 2-3 million Treg/kg

    • Target ratio of T-cell to Treg: 1:1

    • Conventional T-cell dose: 3 million/kg

    • CD34 dose: >2 million/kg

    low

    med

    high

    104 106 108

    T cells per kg

    Ris

    k o

    f G

    vHD

    ConventionalT cell depleted

    1-agent PPX

    No PPX

  • SLIDE 7

    Clinical protocol Orca-T

    Meyer, E. H., Laport, G., et al. JCI INSIGHT. 2019; 4 (10)

    MA Conditioning

    Day 0: Infusion of HSPCs and Treg(cell dose: 3e6 Treg/kg)

    Day +2: Infusion of Tcon(cell dose: 3e6 Tcells/kg)

    Post-Transplant

    Start Day +3: Single-agent Tacrolimus (4-6 ng/mL target)

    Post-Transplant

    Day 0: Infusion of Apheresis Product (cell dose: 10e8 – 10e9 Tcells/kg)

    Day -1: Tacrolimus

    Days +1, +3, +6, +11: Methotrexate prophylaxis

    MA Conditioning

    SOC

    Orca-T

    Day-10 to Day-2:MA Conditioning

    Day-10 to Day-2:MA Conditioning

  • SLIDE 8

    Clinical protocol Orca-T

    Eligible Patients

    High risk, MRD+, active disease

    Leukemia, Lymphoma, MDS, MPN

    Myelodysplastic syndrome

    KPS >70

    Age

  • SLIDE 9

    Patient demographics Orca-T and SOC control cohortOrca-T* SOC Control Cohort

    Cohort size 50 144

    Median age (range) 47 (20-65) 48 (20-64)

    % Male 52% 49%

    Race White 60% 44%

    African American 2% 2%

    Asian 14% 19%

    Unspecified 26% 30%

    Primary Disease % AML 42% 53%

    ALL 28% 26%

    CML 4% 7%

    B-cell lymphoma 2% 6%

    MDS/MF 16% 22%

    Other (e.g. mixed phenotype acute leukemia)

    8% 2%

    Graft source HLA-matched siblings/URD 62%/38% 56%/44%

    % with active leukemia at time of transplant 23% 21%

    Median f/u (days) 223 days (30 – 1561 days) 886 days (55-1783 days)

    * subjects with ≥ 30 days f/u. Data from NCT04013685 and

    NCT01660607

  • SLIDE 10

    Orca-T manufacturing and supplyVein-to-vein times of less than 72 hours across the continental United States

    NMDP Apheresis Centers

    Mfg & Supply Summary• Manufacturing and logistics carried out by

    Orca Bio • 12+ participating clinical sites in the

    continental US across 3 studies• Product sourced from MRD and MUDs• Consistent vein-to-vein time of less than 72

    hours• No manufacturing nor logistic failures to

    date (90+ patients treated across all studies)

    Clinical center

    Orca Bio GMP

  • SLIDE 11

    Treg Cell Dose

    (by CD45+ Moxi count)

    (in millions of cells/kg)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Treg

    cell

    do

    se (

    millio

    n c

    ells

    /kg

    )

    HSPC DP Cell Dose

    (by CD45+ Moxi count)

    (in millions of cells/kg)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    HSPC

    cell

    do

    se (

    millio

    n c

    ells

    /kg

    )

    Treg % Purity

    Surface Stain

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    Treg

    % C

    D4

    5+

    ce

    lls

    Orca-T manufacturing and supply Central manufacturing with consistent quality and performance to date

    Treg Cell Doses %Treg PurityCD34

  • SLIDE 12

    Orca-T Standard of Care

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    80

    100

    Da

    ys

    ****

    Orca-T Standard of Care

    0

    10

    20

    30

    Da

    ys

    ****

    More rapid engraftment & hospital discharge with Orca-T

    Median 15 vs 17 days; p=0.01

    Time to Platelet Engraftment (Days) Time from Day 0 Hospital Discharge (Days)Time to Neutrophil Engraftment (Days)

    Median 11 vs 17 days; p

  • SLIDE 13

    0

    10

    0

    20

    0

    30

    0

    40

    0

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    Days

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    wit

    h E

    xte

    nsi

    ve c

    GV

    HD Standard of Care

    Orca-T

    0

    50

    10

    00

    10

    20

    30

    40

    Days

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    wit

    h G

    rad

    e

    2 a

    GV

    HD

    Orca-T

    Standard of Care

    Profound reduction of GVHD with Orca-T

    Chronic GvHDGrade ≥2 Acute GvHD

    10%p=0.005

    30%

    3%

    p=0.0002

    46%

  • SLIDE 14

    0 100 200 300 400

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Days

    TR

    M

    Orca-T

    Standard of Care

    0 100 200 300 400

    0

    50

    100

    Days

    GR

    FS

    (%

    )

    Standard of Care

    Orca-T

    Significant improvement in GVHD-free relapse-free survival with Orca-T

    GVHD (≥ grade 3) and Relapse-Free SurvivalTreatment-Related Mortality

    11%

    75%

    p=0.04

    p=0.001

    0%

    31%

  • SLIDE 15

    Durable disease control demonstrated with Orca-T

    Orca retains GvT effect• Despite markedly reduced GVHD rates

    with Orca-T, early data suggests that GvTeffect is preserved

    • Patients at relapse or with at least 180 days of follow up.

    Deceased

    Active/refractory disease/PR

    CR, MRD+

    CR, MRD-

    Pre-Orca-T Day 90 Day 180 Day 356

  • SLIDE 16

    Orca-T presentation summary

    Disease control demonstrated in several patients with active disease at time of Tx

    Central GMP laboratory production with no manufacturing/distribution failures

    Vein-to-vein times of less than 72 hours across the continental United States

    No Transplant Related Mortalities observed to date.

    GRFS GvT

    GvHD

    TRM

    1-yr GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS) more than doubled compared to SOC.

    Dramatically reduced acute and chronic GvHD compared to SOC despite reduced use of immunosuppressive meds.

    Orca-T has been granted Regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) by the FDA

    Improved time-to-engraftment compared to SOC.

    Engraft

  • SLIDE 17

    Acknowledgments

    Robert Negrin, MD | Steve Devine, MD | Anna Moroz, MD, PhD | Lori

    Muffly, MD | Parveen Shiraz, MD | David Miklos, MD, PhD | Kailey Zaffran |

    Anna Hoppe | John Petersen | NMDP Apheresis center staff and couriers |

    Michelle Chin | Kelly Chyan | Khanh Nguyen | Heraa Hashmi | Stanford

    Cell Therapy Lab & Apheresis staff | Emily Schwab | Leslie Mellor | UC

    Davis Cell Therapy Lab & Apheresis staff | Mindi Yost | Marietta Wadley |

    OHSU Cell Therapy Lab & Apheresis staff | Jeff Roesgen | Nichola Fell |

    KUMC Cell Therapy Lab & Apheresis staff | Joshua Sasine, MD | Caspian

    Oliai, MD | Bruck Habtemariam | Carla Petro | UCLA Cell Therapy Lab &

    Apheresis staff | Be The Match Biotherapies | Kevin Sheehan | Randy

    Amstrong | Orca Bio's CRO Partners | Orca Bio Mfg & Supply | Kate Bickett

    | Hollie Pisseri | Virginia Sullivan | Sherry Toney | Marina Becker |

    Jeroen Bekaert, PhD | Ivan Dimov, PhD

  • SLIDE 18

    Questions?