online conversations: sense or nonsense? by di tunney & rachel francis

16
Online Conversations: Sense or Nonsense? What do we need to know to get it right? Qualitative Consumer Research & Insights 2011 6-8 April 2011, Malta

Upload: merlien-institute

Post on 26-Jun-2015

338 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Online conversations: sense or nonsense? by Di Tunney & Rachel FrancisBrainstorming session presented at Merlien Institute's QCRI2011 conference in Malta7 & 8 April 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Online Conversations:

Sense or Nonsense?What do we need to know to get it right?

Qualitative Consumer Research & Insights 2011

6-8 April 2011, Malta

Page 2: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Workshop Objectives

A conversation to establish ‘best practice’ guidelines on the following areas:

• When and how to communicate with customers in social

media communities

• How to capture valid insights from online conversations

• Where to draw the line in using the personal information

that customers are revealing online

And to do this we will leverage the conversations currently happening on line

Page 3: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Workshop Structure

14.00 – 14.10 Introduction to workshop and discussion topics

14.10– 14.15 You will be randomly assigned into 6 groups of approx equal size

Each group will be given a topic to discuss and a guideline associated

with that topic to develop

14.15 – 14.45 Use the stimulus material to discuss with your group the topic you

have been assigned. This could take the form of a debate with half the

group identifying positive points about the topic – the other half

negative points or just of people putting forward different points of

view

14.45– 15.00 Summarise your feedback on flip charts, identifying the best practice

guideline associated with the topic

15.00 – 15.30 Feedback in main group, summarising findings and next steps

Page 4: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Best Practice Issue: Unrestricted access vs. restricted access to consumer generated content

Discussion Topic: Anything posted on social media is fair game for research purposes

Page 5: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Best Practice Issue: Developing ‘new ‘vs. adapting ‘traditional’ sampling criteria/methods

Twitter users represent a relatively skewed sample of the population

Thursday, May 13, 2010 by Joanne Simonis, Cvent

Discussion Topic: You can’t get a representative sample on social media

Page 6: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Best Practice Issue: When Social Media research or traditional research is more ‘appropriate’

Discussion Topic: Some subjects shouldn’t be researched on Social Media

Tom Cohen

Page 7: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

DiscussionTopic: Research bots will replace interviewers & analysts in the next 25 years

Best Practice Issue: When and where to use ‘automated’ vs. ‘manual ‘data collection & analysis

Helium, Terrance Aym

Page 8: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Discussion Topic: Listening is becoming more important than asking questions

Best Practice Issue: When to just ‘listen’ vs. ‘steering the conversation’

What’s the right way to behave when listening in on

online conversations? Jeffrey Henning proposes

consumer-driven rules for social media monitoring

Page 9: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Discussion Topic : Social Media research is a major departure from Traditional

research and will involve learning a new skill set

Best Practice Issue: Development and use of new skills vs. applying existing skills

Page 10: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Feedback

• Prepare your feedback on flipcharts in a form suitable to

present to the rest of the group

• Nominate who will deliver the feedback

• Feedback should show:

1. The key points arising from the discussion

2. The implications for Best Practice Guideliines

• Feedback should be no more than 2 mins long

• Flip charts will be collected at the end of the session so

that the content can be published after the conference

Page 11: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

SUMMING UP

Page 12: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Best Practice Issue Key Points Implications

Unrestricted access vs. restricted

access to consumer generated

content

Developing ‘new’ vs. adapting

‘traditional ‘sampling

criteria/methods

When social media research or

traditional research is more

‘appropriate’

When and where to use

‘automated’ vs. ‘manual ‘data

collection & analysis

When to just ‘listen’ vs. ‘steering

the conversation’

Developing and using new skills

vs. applying existing skills

Page 13: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Is it about balance?

Social Media Research Traditional Market Research

Page 14: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Summing up

• We believe that development of Best Practice in online

conversations will continue to evolve - though

transparent conversations amongst a wide spectrum of

practitioners and clients

• Next Steps

– We publish the outputs from the workshop

– Look forward to the ongoing conversation

Page 15: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Contact

• Website: www.liveinsights.com

• Twitter: @liveinsights

• E mail: [email protected]

[email protected]

Page 16: Online conversations: sense or nonsense? By Di Tunney & Rachel Francis

Presented at the International conference on

Qualitative Consumer Research & Insights

7 & 8 April 2011, Malta

For more information

Please visit: http://www.merlien.org