on a method of comparing mutual inductance and resistance by the help of two-phase alternating...

4
On a Method of Comparing Mutual Inductance and Resistance by the Help of Two-Phase Alternating Currents Author(s): Albert Campbell Source: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, Vol. 81, No. 549 (Dec. 22, 1908), pp. 450-452 Published by: The Royal Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/93020 . Accessed: 06/05/2014 08:42 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . The Royal Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 62.122.78.12 on Tue, 6 May 2014 08:42:03 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Upload: albert-campbell

Post on 07-Jan-2017

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On a Method of Comparing Mutual Inductance and Resistance by the Help of Two-Phase Alternating Currents

On a Method of Comparing Mutual Inductance and Resistance by the Help of Two-PhaseAlternating CurrentsAuthor(s): Albert CampbellSource: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of aMathematical and Physical Character, Vol. 81, No. 549 (Dec. 22, 1908), pp. 450-452Published by: The Royal SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/93020 .

Accessed: 06/05/2014 08:42

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

The Royal Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Proceedings of theRoyal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 62.122.78.12 on Tue, 6 May 2014 08:42:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: On a Method of Comparing Mutual Inductance and Resistance by the Help of Two-Phase Alternating Currents

On a Method of Conparsng Mutual Inductance and Resis,-tancee by the He elp of Two-phase Alternating Currents.

By ALBERT CAMPBELL, B.A.

(Communicated by R. T. Glazebrook, F.R.S. Received September 22,- Read November 5, 1908.)

(Fromi the National Physical Laboratory.)

(1) Introductory.

A standard mutual inductance, after the design recently described by the writer,* has now been constructed at the National Physical Laboratory. As the details of its construction will be published later, it is sufficient here to mention that its value calculated from the dimensions is 10 0178 millihenries. It forms an extremely accurate standard, against which both mutual and self inductances can be readily tested.t In addition to this, it affords a means of obtaining values of resistance coils in absolute measure, and thus evaluating the; ohm. This can be done in an indirect way by finding the capacity of a condenser in terms of resistance and time by Maxwell's Commutator Method, and in terms of resistance and mutual inductance by Heydweiller's nodifica- tion of Carey Foster's method. The comparison of resistance with mutual ilnductance can, however, be made far more simply and directly by the use of two-phase alternating currents in the method which I proceed to describe. I shall first take the ideal simple case, and afterwards notice soi e of the difficulties that may arise in practice.

(2) Theory of the Mlethod.

Iii fig. 1 let M be the mutual inductance (a small fraction of it being adjustable) and Ru the resistance; and let A cospt and B sinpt be currents in quadrature, e.g., fromr a two-phase alternator or a phase-splitting device. Let G be a vibration galvanometer tuned to frequency n, where p = 27rn.

When the galvanometer shows no deflection, the electromotive force introduced into its circuit is zero at every instant, and hence

?(MA cos pt) + RB sinpt = 0,

so that R A = _.pM. (I)

* ' Roy. Soc. Proc.,' p. 428, June 5, 1907. t See ' Phil. Mag.,' January, 1908, p. 155,

This content downloaded from 62.122.78.12 on Tue, 6 May 2014 08:42:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: On a Method of Comparing Mutual Inductance and Resistance by the Help of Two-Phase Alternating Currents

On Comp'ariny Mutual Inductaice aind Resistance. 451

This condition gives a direct comparison between R and M, when p and A/B are known. By observing the speed of the alternator, p is fouind; while the ratio* of A to B is obtained by means of the electrostatic volt- meter V, which is put alternately across the equial resistances r1 and r2, or by a differential electrodynamometer. In practice A is made very nearly equal to B.

- I

B Rim.pt.

FIG. 1.

The condition of balance is arrived at by altering X-, XI, or r) until the galvanometer deflection becomnes zero, accurate qua(ldatuire beiiig nairntained by adjusting the self inductance 12. For examnple, if A/B = 1, for M = 10 millihenries and 1- = 5 ohms, the necessary frequency is about 80 cycles per second.

The chief difficulties at first sight would be in obtaining alternating current of absolutely pure sine wave-form; but the necessity for this is obviated by the use of the vibration g,alvanolteter tuned to resonance witl the fundcamnental in the wave-forni, anld thuis ignoring the harmionics in comparison with the fuincdamentals Al and 131. This is fouind to be the case experimentally, for a sharply (lefined balance was obtainied when a suitable alternator was used; and the mathematical investigation of the mnore general case substantiated this result. If necessary, the harmonics mnay be still further obliterated by electrical tuning with inductance anid capacity in the galvanometer circuit. The effects of a small amnount of self inductance in the resistance R an(d of distributed capacity in the secondary coil have been tlheoretically investigated; it has been found that the formiier is practically negligible, and that, if the latter is not quiite negligible, the proper correction can easily be found.

This content downloaded from 62.122.78.12 on Tue, 6 May 2014 08:42:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 4: On a Method of Comparing Mutual Inductance and Resistance by the Help of Two-Phase Alternating Currents

452 On Comparing Mtlual Inductance and Resistance.

(3) Experimental Working of the Method. A few preliminary experiments have been made to test the working of the

method. The measurement of A1/Bi was made with a long scale electro- static voltmeter which gave about 2 mm. for a difference of I in 10,000. Higher accuracy could rio doubt be obtained by using an electro- dynamometer with two dynamically coupled moving coils; this would allow an accurate measurement of A1-B1 to be made. Errors would be eliminated by interchanging the two circuits of the instrument and taking the mean result. In the experimnents already made, the frequency was held steady at a value approximately correct, and M was varied by the addition of a small accurately calibratecl variable miutual inductance with a range of two or three thousandths of M.

The results obtained have been encouraging and appear to indicate that the method is susceptible of high accuracy. It may be of interest to mention that determinations obtained with an inductor alternator of extremely irregular wave-form showed errors of only 3 per cent.; while with a Siemens sine-wave alternator the divergence from the nominal values was within the limits of experimenltal error, which were of the order of I in 1000. This last is only tlhie resuLlt of a preliminary trial; in the ultimate experiments the, accuracy will be of a mnauch himher ordler.

This content downloaded from 62.122.78.12 on Tue, 6 May 2014 08:42:03 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions