old salt perth pty ltd entertainment barge - home - parks …€¦ ·  · 2016-12-02old salt perth...

15
Document No: 16178-901 Revision: A Status: Information Prepared By: S. Cribb Reviewed By: D. Fletcher Date 18/11/16 This document must be reproduced in colour to ensure clarity. Copyright 2016. This document, including the conceptual content thereof and any specifications and particulars thereto, is an integral part of the intellectual property of McAlpine Marine Design Pty Ltd. This document is not to be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part or loaned or otherwise communicated to any third party or used in any manner detrimental to the interests of McAlpine Marine Design Pty Ltd without said company’s express consent. Acceptance of this document shall be construed as agreement to comply with the aforesaid terms and conditions. 6/11 Sainsbury Rd +61 (0)8 9337 5672 O’Connor [email protected] Western Australia 6163 www.mmd.net.au Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report

Upload: hoangcong

Post on 02-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Document No: 16178-901

Revision: A

Status: Information

Prepared By: S. Cribb

Reviewed By: D. Fletcher

Date 18/11/16

This document must be reproduced in colour to ensure clarity.

Copyright 2016. This document, including the conceptual content thereof and any specifications and particulars thereto, is an integral part of the intellectual property of McAlpine Marine Design Pty Ltd. This document is not to be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part or loaned or otherwise communicated to any third party or used in any manner detrimental to the interests of McAlpine Marine Design Pty Ltd without said company’s express consent. Acceptance of this document shall be construed as agreement to comply with the aforesaid terms and conditions.

6/11 Sainsbury Rd +61 (0)8 9337 5672

O’Connor [email protected]

Western Australia 6163 www.mmd.net.au

Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd

Entertainment Barge

Feasibility Report

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page i

I. DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL

Revisions made to this document.

Revision Date of Issue Author Brief Description of change

A 18/11/16 S.C. Original Issue

I. COMPANY DRAWINGS

Ref. Model No. Rev Brief Description

A1 16178-900 A Preliminary Mooring Arrangement

II. SUPPLIED DRAWINGS

Ref. Dwg. No. Rev Title

B1 G-100-01 1 36.5m General Arrangement

B2 CLK-16-244 2 Equipment Layout Plan

III. SUPPLIED DOCUMENTS

Ref. Doc. No. Rev Title

C1 - - Old Salt Perth (PowerPoint presentation)

C2 - - SludgeHammer – Party Barge Conceptual Design

IV. RULES, CODES, STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS

Ref. Publisher Code Year Title

D1 AMSA - 2016 National Standard for Commercial Vessels

D2 Standards Australia

AS1170.2:2011 2011 Structural design actions Part 2 Wind Actions

D3 British

Standards BS 6349:Part 6 1989

British Standard Code of practice for maritime structures; Part 6. Design of inshore moorings and floating structures

D4 DNV DNV-OS-E301 2010 DNV Offshore Standard; Position Mooring

D5 API API RP 2SK 2005 Design and Analysis of Stationkeeping Systems for Floating Structures

D6 Vryhof Anchors - 2010 Anchor Manual 2010 – The Guide to Anchoring

D7 NCEL TDS 83-08R 1987 Drag Embedment Anchors for Navy Moorings

D8 AMSA AMSA EX2 2016 Marine Safety (Certificates of survey) Exemption 2016

V. ACRONYMS

ABS American Bureau of Shipping

AMSA Australian Maritime Safety Authority

DCV Domestic Commercial Vessel

MED2 Marine Engine Driver Grade 2 NC

NC Near Coastal

NSAMS National Standard for the Administration of Marine Safety

NSCV National Standard for Commercial Vessels

SHHP Super High Holding Power

SMS Safety Management System

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page ii

CONTENTS

I. DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL .............................................................................................................. I

I. COMPANY DRAWINGS ............................................................................................................................... I

II. SUPPLIED DRAWINGS ............................................................................................................................... I

III. SUPPLIED DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................ I

IV. RULES, CODES, STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS............................................................................... I

V. ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................. I

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1

2 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.1 SURVEY .................................................................................................................................................. 1

2.2 BARGE .................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.3 MANNING ................................................................................................................................................ 1

2.4 MOORING ................................................................................................................................................ 1

3 REGULATORY FRAME WORK .................................................................................................................. 2

3.1 CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY ......................................................................................................................... 2

3.2 LOCAL AMSA SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 2

3.3 FOREIGN FLAGGED VESSEL ...................................................................................................................... 2

4 BARGE ......................................................................................................................................................... 3

5 MANNING .................................................................................................................................................... 3

6 MOORING .................................................................................................................................................... 3

APPENDIX A – 1E EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................................... 5

APPENDIX B – PRELIMINARY MOORING ARRANGEMENT.......................................................................... 6

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of the proposed Old Salt Perth Entertainment Barge installation and operations.

This report reviews regulatory requirements and assesses the mooring loads and mooring options available. This report does not assess the requirements of any support vessel/s. This report is confined to the marine aspects of the barge only and does not comment on the business or catering side of the operation.

This report assumes that the barge will be built overseas to classification society rules and will be delivered in survey.

2 SUMMARY

2.1 Survey

Three possible survey methods have been considered; classification society survey, local AMSA survey and foreign flag survey. Given that it is likely that the barge will be built and delivered in classification society survey, it is recommended that the vessel remain in survey with class as an Australian DCV. The advantages are that the vessel will not be limited in length and it is likely that it will be easier to extend the dry docking to every 5 years.

2.2 Barge

Reference B1 illustrates a suitable hull for the vessel Entertainment Barge. A more detailed vessel arrangement will need to be produced when the project progresses to the detailed design phase.

2.3 Manning

Preliminary discussions with the local survey authority indicate the minimum manning requirement is one MED2. It is recommended that the manning of the barge be revisited based on consideration of the vessel’s Safety Management System (SMS) and in consultation with DOTWA and AMSA.

2.4 Mooring

Several mooring methods have been considered for the Entertainment Barge. The most efficient and low impact mooring arrangement appears to be a four point mooring utilising SHHP anchors. Appendix B illustrates an example of preliminary design that would suit the Entertainment Barge.

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page 2

3 REGULATORY FRAME WORK

At the time of writing this report, the author understands that the intention is for the vessel to be built and delivered in ABS classification society survey.

Under the National Law, even though the barge will be permanently moored, it is defined as a vessel and is, therefore, subject to survey requirements. Three possible paths to survey have been identified to date;

1. Classification society: Keep the barge in ABS/class survey and register it as a DCV,

2. Local AMSA survey: Transfer the vessel from class survey to local AMSA DCV survey governed by the NSAMS,

3. Foreign flagged vessel: Transfer the registration to a flag state, i.e. Cook Islands, comply with their survey requirements and operate under the Navigation Act as a foreign vessel.

3.1 Classification society

There are some advantages with keeping the vessel in class. AMSA will accept any vessel as a registered DCV if it is in class with a recognised organisation, i.e. a classification society. As such, the vessel could be taken out of classification society survey at any point and it would be accepted by AMSA as a DCV.

The NSCV states “Vessels of 35 m or more in measured length shall be classed, i.e. designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with the rules of a recognised organisation.” Keeping the vessel in class would allow some flexibility in the vessel length. If the vessel were to be over 35 metres in length, it would need to remain in class survey.

It should be noted that whilst a vessel may be in survey with a classification society, for a vessel to operate as a DCV, the equipment, manning, lifesaving, fire safety and accommodation sections of the NSCV must be adhered to.

A classification society will allow underwater surveys in lieu of docking (UWILD) providing certain conditions are met. This would effectively mean that the vessel’s hull survey could be carried out in situ with the use of divers instead of having to dry dock the vessel. There are a number of conditions that must be met, but they are not expected to be too onerous on a vessel of this type.

3.2 Local AMSA survey

As the vessel will be in class survey when it arrives, it will be accepted into local AMSA survey as a DCV as a matter of course. However, the vessel would be limited to 35 meters. If the vessel were to be less than 35 metres, the applicable rule set would be the NSCV. It should be noted that the NSCV invokes class rules for construction at any rate.

If the vessel were to be taken out of class survey and put into local AMSA survey under NSAMS, there could potentially be some survey cost saving, however, preliminary investigations seem to indicate that this saving would not be that great.

A survey schedule under NSAMS would require the vessel to be dry docked at the third and fifth years of the five year cycle. It is likely that AMSA would grant an exemption for the year 3 dry docking if equivalence with the class requirements for UWILD could be demonstrated. However, it is likely it would be simpler to keep it in class.

3.3 Foreign flagged vessel

It is the author’s opinion, because the vessel will be permanently operating in Australian waters, path no. 3, foreign flagged vessel, is not a viable option as it is intended for vessels engaged in international voyages.

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page 3

4 BARGE

Reference B1 has been put forward as a typical example of a standard barge commonly manufactured in Asia. This barge is adequate in size, subject to the above survey requirements, for the intended layout shown in reference B2 and C1. As the vessel is intended to be permanently moored, the hull shape is fit for purpose.

Whilst there needs to be some more work done on the arrangement to properly deal with machinery, deck fittings and fire and safety equipment, it is the author’s opinion that there is sufficient deck area and compartment space to comply with all expected regulatory and functional requirements.

A generic equipment list for a class 1E vessel (i.e. passenger vessel, smooth waters) is attached at Appendix A. Whilst this gives a good indication of the equipment likely to be required, a more specific equipment list would need to be agreed with the local authorities due to the vessel’s unique set of operation circumstances.

It is intended at this stage that the sewage treatment plant be installed below deck, see reference C2. To properly maintain this system, we would recommend that sufficient access be built in to the vessel for this purpose. That is, the bolted flush man holes typically provided with these barges would not be practical in this instance. A hinged watertight door with regulation coaming and a step type ladder would be ideal in this situation. However, a hinged hatch with coaming and a vertical ladder would suffice.

Our understanding is that any on board generator sets would be in a purpose built, appropriately fire protected space above deck for ease of maintenance.

The accommodation layout of the vessel is intended to meet NSCV Part C Section 1. This includes compliance with Chapter 4, 4.11.4 Access for persons with disabilities.

It is intended that the support vessel and the barge will be designed/ballasted to ensure that the loading and off-loading decks on both vessels are level with each other to ensure safe transfer of passengers and personnel via a suitable short gangway.

5 MANNING

The vessel meets the requirements of Reference D8 and as such is subject to the survey requirements that applied to the vessel on 30 June 2013. This essentially means that the minimum manning requirement can be determined by the DOTWA.

Preliminary discussions with DOTWA indicate that the minimum manning for this vessel would likely be one MED2, however, this would depend on the size and complexity of machinery and would need to be confirmed as more details come to hand. DOTWA also indicated that the permanently moored barge could essentially share a master with the continuously operating support vessel on the condition that there was a continuous method of communication between the two vessels and line of sight was established at all times. Again this would need to be confirmed when more details come to hand.

Note that the above is the “minimum” manning requirement and the vessel’s Safety Management System (SMS) would indicate a more appropriate level of manning.

6 MOORING

A number of mooring methods were considered for this vessel. Required mooring characteristics are as follows:

• Directional stability, i.e. not allow the vessel to rotate

• Be capable of holding the barge in all weather conditions, i.e. permanently moored

• Low environmental impact

The original preference was to use spuds to hold the vessel in place. Unfortunately, due to the vessel’s requirement to be permanently moored, it was deemed the mooring needed to be able to withstand winds in excess of 60 knots. Due to the large sail area of the vessel, the loads are quite large. The holding power of a spud in mud/silt is difficult to determine and not as effective as an anchor. It was felt that the spuds presented too great a risk of dragging. They also require machinery to lift and lower presenting other unwanted risks.

Permanently fixed piles are very effective with regard to directional stability and holding capacity, however, they are very difficult to remove. It was felt that they presented too much of an environmental impact.

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page 4

It was decided that a four point mooring utilising super high holding power (SHHP) anchors presented the best option. Appendix B shows a preliminary mooring design suitable for the vessel and its intended location. This mooring design is based on a 1/50 year storm. The high holding power of some anchors allows a relatively small footprint on the river bed compared to the use of clump weights. Relatively short lengths of chain are then attached to each corner of the vessel to prevent it from rotating. The chain catenary helps hold the vessel in situ which also prevents the chain from sweeping across the river bed as single point moorings can. The four point mooring is relatively easily installed and can be easily removed at a later date with little impact.

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page 5

Appendix A – 1E Equipment List

This page is intentionally left blank

Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Canberra ACT Australia – July 2013 AMSA 695 (07/13) Page 1 of 5

This Guidance Notice provides details of the Class 1E vessel equipment list required under the National Standard for Commercial Vessels (NSCV).

Glossary and Key: to terms and phrases used in the vessel equipment list

/ or

< less than

> greater than

≤ equal to or less than

≥ equal to or greater than

xxm measured length in metres

nm nautical miles

100% for total complement of vessel (maximum number of passengers and crew permitted)

AIS Automatic Identification System

All refers to vessels of any length in that class

ECS Electronic Chart System

ECDIS Electronic Chart and Display Information System

GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System

GT Gross Tonnage

LCS Limited Coast Station

MO Marine Order

PA System Public Address System

This list is accurate as at 11 July 2013. Please check the current version of the NSCV and maritime legislation, or contact the National Regulator, to confirm current requirements.

VESSEL EQUIPMENT LIST – CLASS 1E

GUIDANCE NOTICE

Guidance Notice – vessel equipment list Class 1E

Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Canberra ACT Australia – July 2013 AMSA 695 (07/13) Page 2 of 5

Items required Vessels affected

Buoyant appliances (lifebuoy to support 2 persons) Vessels operating in areas with a monthly mean water temperature of 15° C or less, see NSCV Part C, Section 7A Table 2.

Dinghy / buoyant appliances / lifebuoys 40%* All (except below)

Buoyant appliances for 100%* Vessels with a passenger limit between 13 and 36 day passengers

Suitable equipment to sustain and recover persons overboard, e.g. heaving line with rescue quoit, ladder, rescue sling, scramble net

<25m

Lifebuoys (light and smoke signals to be self-activating, lifebuoy to support 2 persons)

6 minimum: 1 with light and 1 with buoyant line ≥60m, additional to buoyancy requirements

4 minimum: 1 with light and 1 with buoyant lines ≥45m <60m, additional to buoyancy requirements

2 minimum: 1 with light and 1 with buoyant line ≥10m <45m, additional to buoyancy requirements

1 minimum with light <10m, additional to buoyancy requirements

Lifejackets

Coastal lifejacket with whistle 100% All

Distress signals

EPIRB 406MHz (registered) Vessels operating >2nm from coast

2 Red hand-held flares All

1 Hand-held orange smoke signal All

* Open reversible liferafts of equivalent aggregate capacity to replace buoyant appliances on vessels continuously engaged on voyages in operational areas with a monthly mean water temperature of 15°C or less.

Guidance Notice – vessel equipment list Class 1E

Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Canberra ACT Australia – July 2013 AMSA 695 (07/13) Page 3 of 5

Items required Vessels affected

Onboard communications and alarm systems

General emergency alarm system ≥25m

PA system if no direct communications to passengers in emergencies

All

Emergency electrical installation and equipment

Battery-operated torch for 100% crew All

Navigation equipment Vessels 35m or more in length shall comply with MO 21.

Clock <35m

Pair of binoculars fitted with neck strap and carrying case

<35m

Echo sounder <35m

Signalling light All

Nautical publications <35m

ECDIS / ECS / Paper charts and backup <35m ≥12m

GNSS <35m where plotting equipment (ECDIS, ECS, etc.) is fitted

Radar <35m ≥12m

Radar reflector <12m

Speed and distance indicator <35m

Compass (card 75mm minimum diameter) <10m

Compass (card 100mm minimum diameter) ≥10m <20m

Compass (card 125mm minimum diameter) <35m ≥20m

Communication system to emergency steering <35m

Guidance Notice – vessel equipment list Class 1E

Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Canberra ACT Australia – July 2013 AMSA 695 (07/13) Page 4 of 5

Items required Vessels affected

Miscellaneous equipment

Windlass, anchors and cables (See NSCV Part C Section 7D for anchoring requirements)

All

Hawsers and warps All

Medical stores as per NSCV Part C Section 7A Annex H lists, Scale F

Vessels carrying berthed passengers

Medical stores as per NSCV Part C Section 7A Annex H lists, Scale G

Vessels carrying unberthed passengers

Logbook (See NSCV Part E) All

VHF Radio/VHF Radio with DSC All

Current edition of the “Marine VHF Radio Operators Handbook”

≥7.5m with radio

Navigation lights, day shapes, and flags as per the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (MO 30)

All

Whistle ≥12m

Sound signal <12m

Bell (300mm minimum diameter) ≥20m

Gong ≥100m

Propeller and rudder indicator ≥15m

Bilge pumps (see Table 1) ≥5m

Bucket for bailing vessel (see Table 1) <5m

Collar repair kit and air pump All Inflatables/RIBs

Pilot ladder and boarding arrangements Where pilots are likely to be employed and the distance from the lightest seagoing waterline to the place of access to the ship is 1.5m or more

Gangway or approved safe means of access All

Boat hook <10m

Note: For Fire Fighting Equipment complying with the NSCV, please refer to the NSCV Part C Section 4.

07/13 – This Guidance Notice is provided for information only. No responsibility will be accepted from the use of the information contained in this fact sheet.

Further InformationFor a copy of the National Standard for Commercial Vessels, please visit www.nationalsystem.amsa.gov.au

Alternatively, contact AMSA, by phone: 1300 517 246 or email: [email protected]

Guidance Notice – vessel equipment list Class 1E

Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Canberra ACT Australia – July 2013 AMSA 695 (07/13) Page 5 of 5

Table 1: Bilge Pumps

Manual pumps with discharge capacity

Power pumps with discharge capacity

Measured length of vessel

NumberCapacity in kilolitre/hour

NumberCapacity in kilolitre/hour

< 5m Bailing bucket acceptable for open boats provided the bilge is readily accessible

≥ 5m < 7.5m 1 4.0

≥ 7.5m < 10m 2 4.0

≥ 10m <12.5m 1 5.5 1 5.5

≥ 12.5m < 17.5m 1 5.5 1 11.0

≥ 17.5m < 20m 1 8.0 1 11.0

≥ 20m < 25m - - 2 11.0

≥ 25m < 35m - - 2 15.0

Note: On vessels 15m and greater in length, the bilge system must be capable of pumping and draining from every space in the vessel while any one watertight compartment (apart from the machinery space) is flooded.

Project: Entertainment Barge Feasibility Report Document: 16178-901

Client: Old Salt Perth Pty Ltd Revision A

Page 6

Appendix B – Preliminary Mooring Arrangement

This page is intentionally left blank