office of pipeline safety impacts of integrity management james k. o’steen deputy associate...

10
Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline Safety Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Upload: mitchell-harvey

Post on 13-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

Impacts of Integrity Management

James K. O’Steen

Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline

Safety

July 23, 2002

Page 2: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

We’ve Had A Plan for Continuous Improvement

• Over the last 10 years we’ve added many dimensions to the pipeline safety program° Damage Prevention

° Risk-Based, Comprehensive Integrated Approach – Integrity Management

° Environmental Protection

° Security/Local First Response Involvement

Page 3: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 e

DamageDamagePreventionPrevention

(DP)(DP)

DamageDamagePreventionPrevention

(DP)(DP)

EnvironmentEnvironmentEnvironmentEnvironment

Risk BasedRisk BasedComprehensiveComprehensive

IntegratedIntegratedApproachApproach

Risk BasedRisk BasedComprehensiveComprehensive

IntegratedIntegratedApproachApproach

Security/LocalSecurity/LocalFirst ResponseFirst ResponseInvolvementInvolvement

Security/LocalSecurity/LocalFirst ResponseFirst ResponseInvolvementInvolvement

1981 ------Standard Pipeline Inspection Program –------On-going1981 ------Standard Pipeline Inspection Program –------On-going

Fire ServiceTraining

USA Workshops

SCADA Study

WA Pilots

ElectronicTown Meetings

Local RMProspectuses

Y2K Prep

DOE AgreementOPS Community

Assistance - $3.5M

National PipelineMapping System

Unusually Sensitive

Areas Regulation

New TankStandards

Build Water &Eco-Maps

MappingQuality Team

EPA Agreement

FEMA NaturalDisaster Study

Oil Pollution ActImplemented

Advisory Committee

System IntegrityInspections

Risk ManagementDemo Program

Reauthorization Integrity ManagementRulemakings

Risk Assessment Prioritization

Pipeline SafetySummit

Risk Assessment Quality Teams

Damage Prevention

Quality Team

Joint Conference

w/NTSB

DP RegulationOne Call Requirement

TEA-21OPS Community

Assistance - $3.5M

TIMELINE TO INCREASED SAFETY

Common GroundAlliance

One Call Study

Dig Safely

9/11 SecurityPlanning

Prep Exercises(w/Coast Guard &

EPA)

Page 4: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Pipeline Incidents

Gas Distribution Pipeline Incidents; 15% Decrease

Gas Transmission Pipeline Incidents; 1% Increase

Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Accidents; 39% Decrease

0

100

200

300

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

All Pipeline Type Incidents; 23% Decrease

Num

ber o

f Inc

iden

ts

Page 5: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

Integrity Management

• Good process° Involves all stakeholders

° Uses consensus standards

° Good communications

° Comprehensive web site resources Open data base

Protocols

Frequently Asked Questions

° Continuous improvement process

° Enforcement – tough & fair, part of continuous improvement process

Page 6: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

Next Steps in Continuous Improvement

• Fill regulatory gaps – Gas Integrity Management

• Improve operator and regulator qualifications

• Reduce pipeline excavation damage

• Make national oversight uniform and share responsibility with States

Page 7: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

Next Steps in Continuous Improvement Plan

• Improved data

• Establish meaningful performance measures

• Make better use of technology

• Increased security planning

• Clear the agency record

Page 8: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

Clear The Agency Record

• One year ago 65 mandates and recommendations were outstanding

• Substantially completed work on half

• Strong regulatory program important for safety, confidence and future growth

Page 9: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

Building Public Confidence

• Improve the safety of the national pipeline system

• Have effective Federal and State Regulators

• Implement effective damage prevention, integrity management and operator qualifications programs

• Communicate effectively with stakeholders

Page 10: Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002

Office of Office of Pipeline Pipeline SafetySafety

President’s Energy Policy

• We must enhance the safety, integrity and public confidence in the national pipeline system in order to build the new pipelines necessary to meet the nation’s energy needs.