nuclear models
DESCRIPTION
Nuclear models. Our approach…. Look at data that motivates the model Construct a model Make and test predictions from the model. Models we will consider…. Independent particle shell model. Collective models. Fermi gas model. Shell Model - data. 2p separation energy (between isotones). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Nuclear models
Models we will consider…• Independent particle shell model
• Look at data that motivates the model• Construct a model• Make and test predictions from the model
Our approach…
• Collective models
• Fermi gas model
Shell Model - data2p separation energy (between isotones)
Becomes much smaller after 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126
2n separation energy (between isotopes)
Shell Model - dataARn + A-4Po
T
Sudden rise at N = 126
Neutron capture cross section
Very small at N = 28, 50, 82, 126
Abrupt change in nuclear radius at N = 20, 28, 50, 82, 126R
Ravg
Shell Model - data
And, the observation of discrete photon energies E emitted from nuclear de-excitation
T show sharp discontinuities near N,Z of 28, 50, 82, 126
BE for last n added: sharp discontinuities near, 50, 82, 126 e.g., (d,p), (n,), ( ,n), (d,t) reactions
Shell ModelAssume that the nucleons move (independently) in a potential, V, created by the other nucleons in the nucleus.
Assume that the problem can be addressed by the non-relativistic Schrodinger quantum mechanics.
Assume that the potential, V, is spherically symmetric and therefore only a function of r, V(r)
€
V r( ) = −Vo r ≤ R
V r( ) = 0 r > R
€
V r( )∝ r 2 €
V r( ) = −Vo1+ exp r − R( ) /a[ ]
€
Vso r( )r L ⋅r s Spin-orbit potential
Shell Model
€
Vso r( )r L ⋅r s
€
ˆ H , ˆ J 2[ ] = 0 ˆ H , ˆ J z[ ] = 0
€
J 2 =r J ⋅
r J
r J =
r L +
r s
J 2 =r L ⋅
r L + 2
r L ⋅r s +
r s ⋅r s
J 2 = L2 + s 2 + 2r L ⋅r s
r L ⋅r s = J 2 − L2 − s 2
2
€
J 2 = j j +1( )h2
L2 = l l +1( )h2
s 2 = s s +1( )h2
€
r L ⋅ r s = 1
2j j +1( ) − l l +1( ) − s s +1( )[ ] h2
Q.M.
€
ψn,l ,s, j ,m j
good quantum numbers
Shell Model
€
2 ⋅ 2l +1( )
€
r L ⋅ r
s j=l +1/2
−r L ⋅ r
s j=l −1/ 2
=2l +1( )
2h2
€
ψn,l ,s, j ,m j
€
2 j +1( )Multiplicities --
2 spin states
€
ml
different states
€
m j
different states
=
Energy difference (splitting) increases with
€
l
Shell Model energy levels
Energy splitting increases with
€
l
Spectroscopic state
multiplicity
Systematics…
A Z NNumber
of known stable
nucleonsStable Radio-
active μ
I Odd Odd Even 50 50 11 Uullψ lre & po.
II Odd Even Odd 55 36 4 Uullψ μll, ne.
III Even Odd Odd 4 4 9 Uullψ poitive
IV Even Even Even 165 12 1 Indeterμinte
Nucleon Clifiction Nucler μoμent
Nuclear magnetic moments
€
μN = 3.152451×18−18 MeV /gauss
μ β = 5.788378 ×18−15 MeV /gauss
€
μNμ β
= meM N
≈ 11836€
μ p = 2.7928 μ N
μ n = −1.9131μ NIntrinsic (measured) dipole magnetic moments
€
μL* = e
2Mr L
μ l* = eh
2Ml l +1( )
μ l* = μ N l l +1( )
L is orbital angular momentum for single nucleon
M is nucleon mass
€
μl ≡lμN max z-axis projection
Nuclear magnetic moments
€
μ p* = 2μ N s s +1( )
μ p = ±μ N
From electron case, you expect to have for this fermion --
Does not agree with measurement
€
μ p = 2.7928 μ N
μ n = −1.9131μ NMeasured dipole magnetic moments
€
μ p* = gpμ N s s +1( ) = gpμ N
32
μ p = ± gp μ N12
€
gp=μ p
*
μ N s s +1( )
gp=2μ p
μ N ; gp= 2 2.7928( ) = 5.5856
Nuclear magnetic momentsAnd, by the same analysis, one gets --
€
μ p = 2.7928 μ N
μ n = −1.9131μ NMeasured dipole magnetic moments€
μn* = gn μ N s s +1( ) = gn μ N
32
μ n = ± gn μ N12
€
gn = μ n*
μ N s s +1( )
gn =2μ nμ N
; gn = 2 −1.9131( ) = -3.8262
€
gp = 5.5856
gn = −3.8262
Nuclear magnetic momentsConsider nuclei with odd A.
Assume that the pairing interaction causes the “core” of paired nucleons to have net I = 0.
Assume that the induced magnetic dipole moment is due to the last unpaired nucleon.
Use this to estimate the nuclear magnetic dipole moment - within this model.
Nuclear magnetic moments
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
j = l − s
€
j = l + s
€
gl
€
gl
€
gs
€
gs€
g
€
g€
gs
€
gs
€
μn* = gn μ N s s +1( ) = gn μ N
32
μ n = ± gn μ N12
€
μ p* = gpμ N s s +1( ) = gpμ N
32
μ p = ± gp μ N12
€
μl* = gl μN l * = gl μN l l +1( )
μ l = ± gl μN l
€
μ j* = gμN j* = gμN j j +1( )
μ j = ± gμN j
€
proton : gl =1 neutron : gl = 0
Nuclear magnetic moments
€
cos l * j*( ) =
l *( )
2+ j*
( )2
− s*( )
2
2l * j*
cos s* j*( ) =
s*( )
2+ j*
( )2
− l *( )
2
2s* j*
€
μ j* = μ l * cos l * j*( ) + μ s* cos s* j*
( )
€
g j*( ) = gl l *
( )cos l * j*( ) + gs s*
( )cos s* j*( )[ ]μ N
€
g( ) = gl
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟1+
l *( )
2− s*
( )2
j*( )
2
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥+ gs
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟1−
l *( )
2− s*
( )2
j*( )
2
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
j = l − s
€
j = l + s
€
gl
€
gl
€
gs
€
gs€
g
€
g€
gs
€
gs
Nuclear magnetic moments
€
g( ) = gl
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟1+
l *( )
2− s*
( )2
j*( )
2
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥+ gs
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟1−
l *( )
2− s*
( )2
j*( )
2
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥
€
j*( )
2= j j +1( ) = l + 1
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟⋅ l + 1
2+1
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
j*( )
2= l l + 2( ) + 3
4
s*( )
2= 3
4
Consider the case:
€
j = l + s( )
€
g( ) = gllj
+ gs1/2
j…some algebra happens here…
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
j = l − s
€
j = l + s
€
gl
€
gl
€
gs
€
gs€
g
€
g€
gs
€
gs
Nuclear magnetic momentsConsider the case:
€
j = l + s( )
€
g( ) = gllj
+ gs1/2
j
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
j = l − s
€
j = l + s
€
gl
€
gl
€
gs
€
gs€
g
€
g€
gs
€
gs
€
μ = g( ) j = g( )Iμ = gl l + gssμ = gl l + μ s
But, if
€
I = l + s( )
€
μ =gl (I −1/2) + μ s
Nuclear magnetic momentsConsider the case:
€
j = l − s( )
€
g( ) = gll +1j +1
− gs1/2j +1
Four cases to consider: both cases shown here for odd proton & odd neutron
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
j = l − s
€
j = l + s
€
gl
€
gl
€
gs
€
gs€
g
€
g€
gs
€
gs
€
μ = gl l + gl + μ s[ ]I
I +1 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
But, if
€
I = l − s( )
€
μ =gl I − μ s − gl
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟ II +1 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
Nuclear magnetic moments
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
l*
€
s*
€
j*
€
s*
€
j = l − s
€
j = l + s
€
gl
€
gl
€
gs
€
gs€
g
€
g€
gs
€
gs
Proton: Neutron:
€
gl =1, μ s = μ p
€
gl = 0, μ s = μ n
€
μ =gl I − μ s − gl
2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟ II +1 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
€
j = l − s( )
€
μ =gl (I −1/2) + μ s
€
j = l + s( )