notice of construction application - washington · 2019-03-04 · emission calculations for...
TRANSCRIPT
I TRANSPORTATION amp TERMINALS
Certified Mail 70171450 00015833 0360
November 7 2018
Attn Karin Baldwin WA Department of Ecology Cashiering Unit PO Box 47611 Olympia WA 98504-7611
RE Notice of Construction Application Administrative Permit Changes Tidewater Terminal Company Snake River Terminal 671 Tank Farm Road Pasco WA 99301 Approval Order No 17AQ-E003
Dear Ms Baldwin
Tidewater Terminal Companys Tidewater) Snake River Terminal in Pasco WA is proposing administrative changes to Approval Order No 17 AQ-E003 A Notice of Construction (NOC) Application and supporting documentation is included in this submittal and described below The following changes are requested
bull Modify Gasoline Receiving Estimates in Table 2la
bull Modify Ethanol Shipping Limitations in Table 2lb
bull Update Tank information in Table A Petroleum Product Storage
Gasoline Receiving Update To facilitate our customers ability to supply fuel to the region we request our permit include a receiving estimate of 20000000 gallons for gasoline by Rail Note that we do not intend to change the Maximum Total Receiving Volume currently in the permit we instead request the Pipeline receiving estimate be reduced to offset the increased Rail volume Gasoline railcars are unloaded at our terminal into our above ground storage tanks equipped with internal floating roofs as required by our permit to control emissions There are no emissions associated with the railcars during unloading as a vacuum is applied to remove the product from the railcar(s) Emissions are limited to tank storage and working losses which we calculate and summarize as part of our normal reporting to Ecology per section 6 of our permit
Gasoline Receiving Permitted Volumes Table 2la (gal Proposed Volumes (gal)
Pipeline 120000000 100000000
Barge 143000000 143000000
Truck 60000000 60000000
Rail 0 20000000
Maximum Total Receiving 323000000 323000000
6305 NV Old Lower River RoJd Vancouver WA 98660 bull 36(16931491 bull wwwtidfaMtercom
Ethanol Shipping Update Tidewater has experienced an increased customer demand for shipping ethanol from our terminal via the Truck Rack To facilitate our customers needs we request our ethanol shipping limitation be increased from 20000000 to 28000000 Note that we do not intend to change the Maximum Total Receiving Volume currently in the permit we instead request the Barge wcontrols limitation be reduced to offset the increased Truck Rack volume
Ethanol Shipping Permited Volumes Table 2la (gal) Proposed Volumes (gal)
Truck Rack 20000000 28000000
Barge wo controls 1890000 1890000
Barge w controls 158110000 150110000
Total Tank Throughput Limit 180000000 180000000
Emission calculations for volatile organic compounds (VOCs oxides of nitrogen (NOx) carbon monoxide (CO) and toxic air pollutants (TAP) associated with ethanol shipping via the Truck Rack and Barge wcontrols are attached For comparison calculations were conducted using the current permitted volumes and the proposed volumes the total change in emissions is presented below Note that we currently have low customer demand for shipping ethanol by barge we shipped 18948446 gallons in 2016 and 24041388 gallons in 2018 which are well below the permit limit
voes NOx co TAP Total Change in Emissions (tons)
017 -007 042 0000505
Tank Information Update Table A Petroleum Product Storage currently includes four ethanol tanks with assumed names for purposes of permitting (ie Tanks le 2e 3e and 4e) Tidewater began construction on two tanks in August 2018 Tanks 86 and 87 which are schedule to be completed in early 2019 The specifications in the table for the two tanks are the same as permitted new tanks numbers were assigned and should now be listed as 86 and 87 Tanks le 2e 3e 4e are also listed in sections 26 and 31 these numbers should be replaced with 86 and 87 Note that in the NOC application for the new tanks the floating roof design was initially proposed as an Alumintor 1000 which is constructed of aluminum The final design will be constructed of steel there are no changes in the emissions associate with the roof construction material The roof seal remains the same as proposed (Mini-Shoetrade Primary Seal) Manufacturer information for this equipment is attached
Tanks 2 and 24 are used swing tanks product can switch between gasoline and ethanol For clarification we request that the product is listed as gasolineethanol in Table A Petroleum Product Storage
Tidewater appreciates the assistance provided by the Department of Ecology for this project Please contact me at (360) 693-1491 if you have any questions or if you require additional information
Sincerely
Stephanie Kranz Environmental Manager
Enclosure
2
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
A notice of construction permit is required before installing a new source of air pollution or modifying an existing source of air pollution This application applies to facilities in Ecologys jurisdiction Submit this application for review of your project For general information about completing the application refer to Ecology Forms ECY 070-41 0a-g Instructions for Ecologys Notice of Construction Application
Ecology offers up to 2 hours of free pre-application help We encourage you to schedule a pre-application meeting with the contact person specified for the location of your proposal (see below) For more help than the initial 2 free hours submit Part 1 of the application and the application fee You may schedule a meeting with us at any point in the process
Completing the application enclose it with a check for the initial fee and mail to
WA Department of Ecology ~middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot I For Fiscal Office Use OnlyCashiering Unit I
001-NSR-216-0299-000404PO Box 47611 I
L--middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot Olympia WA 98504-7611
Check the box for the location of your proposal For help call the contact listed below
Ecology Permitting Office Contact
Lynnette Haller Chelan Douglas Kittitas Klickitat or Okanogan County
(509) 457-7126 CRO Ecology Central Regional Office - Air Quality Program
lynnettehallerecywagov
Adams Asotin Columbia Ferry Franklin Jolaine Johnson
~ Garfield Grant Lincoln Pend Oreille Stevens (509) 329-3452
ERO Walla Walla or Whitman County jolainejohnsonecywagov
Ecology Eastern Regional Office - Air Quality Program
Dave Adler San Juan County
( 425) 649-7267 NWRO Ecology Northwest Regional Office - Air Quality Program
davidadlerecy wa gov
Kraft and Sulfite Paper Mills and Aluminum Smelters
JamesDeMayEcology Industrial Section- Waste 2 Resources Program (360) 407-6868
IND Permit manager jamesdemayecywagov
Phil Gent US Department of Energy Hanford Reservation
(509) 372-7983 NWP Ecology Nuclear Waste Program
Qhilgentecywagov
To request ADA accommodation call (360) 407-6800 711 (relay service) or 877-833-6341 (TTY)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 11 2016) Page 1 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
Check the box for the fee that applies to your application
New project or equipment
$1500 Basic project initial fee covers up to 16 hours ofreview
$10000 Complex project initial fee covers up to 106 hours of review
ti Change to an exis ng permit or eqmpmen t
$200 Administrative or simple change initial fee covers up to 3 hours of review
Ecology may determine your change is complex during completeness review ofyour application If your project is complex you must pay the additional $675 before we will continue working on your application
~ $875 Complex change initial fee covers up to 10 hours ofreview
$350 flat fee Replace or alter control technology equipment (JvAC 173-400-114)
Ecology will contact you ifwe determine your change belongs in another fee category You must pay the fee associated with that category before we will continue working on your application
Read each statement then check the box next to it to acknowledge that you agree
The initial fee you submitted may not cover the cost ofprocessing your application Ecology will ~ track the number ofhours spent on your project Ifthe number ofhours Ecology spends exceeds
the hours included in your initial fee Ecology will charge you $95 per hour for the extra time
~ You must include all information in this application Ecology may not process your application if it does not include all the information requested
~ Submittal ofthis application allows Ecology staff to inspect your facility
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 2 of 6
DCPARTMC~T OF
ECOLOGY Stti- of Wnhlntlan Notice of Construction Application
Part 1 General Information I middotmiddotbullbullProiectFacility aiid Company Information
1 Project Name Adminstrative Permit Changes 2 Facility Name Snake River Terminal 3 Facility Street Address 671 Tank Farm Rd Pasco WA 99301 4 Facility Legal Description
5 Company Legal Name (if different than Facility Name) Tidewater Terminal Company 6 Company Mailing Address (street city state zip) 671 TankFarmRdPasco WA99301
1 Facility Contact Name (who will be on-site) RonMcClarv 2 Facility Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address)
3 Facility Contact Phone Number 14 Facility Contact Email 509-54 7-7701 ronmtidewatercom 5 Billing Contact Name (who should receive billing information) Accounts Payable 6 Billing Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address) PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 7 Billing Contact Phone Number 18 Billing Contact Email (360) 693-1491 aotidewatercom
9 Consultant Name ( optional - if 3rd party hired to complete application)
10 Consultant OrganizationCompany
11 Consultant Mailing Address (street city state zip)
12 Consultant Phone Number 113 Consultant Email
14 Responsible Official Name and Title (person responsible for project policy or decision-making) William H Collins - Director EHSampS 15 Responsible Official Mailing Address PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 16 Responsible Official Phone 117 Responsible Official Email (3 60) 693-1491 bill collinslaltidewater com 18 Responsible Official Certification and Signature I certify that the information on thi~plication is accurate and complete
Signature Al~ j_ ~ - Date IL(ar- i
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 3 of 6
ECOLOGY ir ~YJhmtr Notice of Construction Application
Part 2 Technical Information
The Technical Information may be sent with this application to the Ecology Cashiering Unit or may be sent directly to the appropriate Ecology office along with a copy of this application
For all sections check the box next to each item as you complete it
III Project Description
Attach the following to your application
~ Description of your proposed project
~ Projected construction start and completion dates
~ Operating schedule and production rates
B List of all major process equipment with manufacturer and maximum rated capacity
B Process flow diagram with all emission points identified
Plan view site map
B Manufacturer specification sheets for major process equipment components
~ Manufacturer specification sheets for pollution control equipment
B Fuel specifications including type consumption (per hour and per year) and percent sulfur
IV State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Compliance
Check the appropriate box below
B SEPA review is complete Include a copy of the final SEPA checklist and SEPA determination (eg DNS MDNS EIS) with your application
~ SEP A review has not been conducted
sectI If SEP A review will be conducted by another agency list the agency You must provide a copy of the final SEP A checklist and SEP A determination before Ecology will issue your permit
Agency Reviewing SEP A
sectI If SEPA review will be conducted by Ecology fill out a SEPA checklist and submit it with your application You can find a SEP A checklist online at httpwwwecywagovprogramsseasepaformshtm
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 4 of 6
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Ethanol Shipping Update Tidewater has experienced an increased customer demand for shipping ethanol from our terminal via the Truck Rack To facilitate our customers needs we request our ethanol shipping limitation be increased from 20000000 to 28000000 Note that we do not intend to change the Maximum Total Receiving Volume currently in the permit we instead request the Barge wcontrols limitation be reduced to offset the increased Truck Rack volume
Ethanol Shipping Permited Volumes Table 2la (gal) Proposed Volumes (gal)
Truck Rack 20000000 28000000
Barge wo controls 1890000 1890000
Barge w controls 158110000 150110000
Total Tank Throughput Limit 180000000 180000000
Emission calculations for volatile organic compounds (VOCs oxides of nitrogen (NOx) carbon monoxide (CO) and toxic air pollutants (TAP) associated with ethanol shipping via the Truck Rack and Barge wcontrols are attached For comparison calculations were conducted using the current permitted volumes and the proposed volumes the total change in emissions is presented below Note that we currently have low customer demand for shipping ethanol by barge we shipped 18948446 gallons in 2016 and 24041388 gallons in 2018 which are well below the permit limit
voes NOx co TAP Total Change in Emissions (tons)
017 -007 042 0000505
Tank Information Update Table A Petroleum Product Storage currently includes four ethanol tanks with assumed names for purposes of permitting (ie Tanks le 2e 3e and 4e) Tidewater began construction on two tanks in August 2018 Tanks 86 and 87 which are schedule to be completed in early 2019 The specifications in the table for the two tanks are the same as permitted new tanks numbers were assigned and should now be listed as 86 and 87 Tanks le 2e 3e 4e are also listed in sections 26 and 31 these numbers should be replaced with 86 and 87 Note that in the NOC application for the new tanks the floating roof design was initially proposed as an Alumintor 1000 which is constructed of aluminum The final design will be constructed of steel there are no changes in the emissions associate with the roof construction material The roof seal remains the same as proposed (Mini-Shoetrade Primary Seal) Manufacturer information for this equipment is attached
Tanks 2 and 24 are used swing tanks product can switch between gasoline and ethanol For clarification we request that the product is listed as gasolineethanol in Table A Petroleum Product Storage
Tidewater appreciates the assistance provided by the Department of Ecology for this project Please contact me at (360) 693-1491 if you have any questions or if you require additional information
Sincerely
Stephanie Kranz Environmental Manager
Enclosure
2
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
A notice of construction permit is required before installing a new source of air pollution or modifying an existing source of air pollution This application applies to facilities in Ecologys jurisdiction Submit this application for review of your project For general information about completing the application refer to Ecology Forms ECY 070-41 0a-g Instructions for Ecologys Notice of Construction Application
Ecology offers up to 2 hours of free pre-application help We encourage you to schedule a pre-application meeting with the contact person specified for the location of your proposal (see below) For more help than the initial 2 free hours submit Part 1 of the application and the application fee You may schedule a meeting with us at any point in the process
Completing the application enclose it with a check for the initial fee and mail to
WA Department of Ecology ~middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot I For Fiscal Office Use OnlyCashiering Unit I
001-NSR-216-0299-000404PO Box 47611 I
L--middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot Olympia WA 98504-7611
Check the box for the location of your proposal For help call the contact listed below
Ecology Permitting Office Contact
Lynnette Haller Chelan Douglas Kittitas Klickitat or Okanogan County
(509) 457-7126 CRO Ecology Central Regional Office - Air Quality Program
lynnettehallerecywagov
Adams Asotin Columbia Ferry Franklin Jolaine Johnson
~ Garfield Grant Lincoln Pend Oreille Stevens (509) 329-3452
ERO Walla Walla or Whitman County jolainejohnsonecywagov
Ecology Eastern Regional Office - Air Quality Program
Dave Adler San Juan County
( 425) 649-7267 NWRO Ecology Northwest Regional Office - Air Quality Program
davidadlerecy wa gov
Kraft and Sulfite Paper Mills and Aluminum Smelters
JamesDeMayEcology Industrial Section- Waste 2 Resources Program (360) 407-6868
IND Permit manager jamesdemayecywagov
Phil Gent US Department of Energy Hanford Reservation
(509) 372-7983 NWP Ecology Nuclear Waste Program
Qhilgentecywagov
To request ADA accommodation call (360) 407-6800 711 (relay service) or 877-833-6341 (TTY)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 11 2016) Page 1 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
Check the box for the fee that applies to your application
New project or equipment
$1500 Basic project initial fee covers up to 16 hours ofreview
$10000 Complex project initial fee covers up to 106 hours of review
ti Change to an exis ng permit or eqmpmen t
$200 Administrative or simple change initial fee covers up to 3 hours of review
Ecology may determine your change is complex during completeness review ofyour application If your project is complex you must pay the additional $675 before we will continue working on your application
~ $875 Complex change initial fee covers up to 10 hours ofreview
$350 flat fee Replace or alter control technology equipment (JvAC 173-400-114)
Ecology will contact you ifwe determine your change belongs in another fee category You must pay the fee associated with that category before we will continue working on your application
Read each statement then check the box next to it to acknowledge that you agree
The initial fee you submitted may not cover the cost ofprocessing your application Ecology will ~ track the number ofhours spent on your project Ifthe number ofhours Ecology spends exceeds
the hours included in your initial fee Ecology will charge you $95 per hour for the extra time
~ You must include all information in this application Ecology may not process your application if it does not include all the information requested
~ Submittal ofthis application allows Ecology staff to inspect your facility
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 2 of 6
DCPARTMC~T OF
ECOLOGY Stti- of Wnhlntlan Notice of Construction Application
Part 1 General Information I middotmiddotbullbullProiectFacility aiid Company Information
1 Project Name Adminstrative Permit Changes 2 Facility Name Snake River Terminal 3 Facility Street Address 671 Tank Farm Rd Pasco WA 99301 4 Facility Legal Description
5 Company Legal Name (if different than Facility Name) Tidewater Terminal Company 6 Company Mailing Address (street city state zip) 671 TankFarmRdPasco WA99301
1 Facility Contact Name (who will be on-site) RonMcClarv 2 Facility Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address)
3 Facility Contact Phone Number 14 Facility Contact Email 509-54 7-7701 ronmtidewatercom 5 Billing Contact Name (who should receive billing information) Accounts Payable 6 Billing Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address) PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 7 Billing Contact Phone Number 18 Billing Contact Email (360) 693-1491 aotidewatercom
9 Consultant Name ( optional - if 3rd party hired to complete application)
10 Consultant OrganizationCompany
11 Consultant Mailing Address (street city state zip)
12 Consultant Phone Number 113 Consultant Email
14 Responsible Official Name and Title (person responsible for project policy or decision-making) William H Collins - Director EHSampS 15 Responsible Official Mailing Address PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 16 Responsible Official Phone 117 Responsible Official Email (3 60) 693-1491 bill collinslaltidewater com 18 Responsible Official Certification and Signature I certify that the information on thi~plication is accurate and complete
Signature Al~ j_ ~ - Date IL(ar- i
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 3 of 6
ECOLOGY ir ~YJhmtr Notice of Construction Application
Part 2 Technical Information
The Technical Information may be sent with this application to the Ecology Cashiering Unit or may be sent directly to the appropriate Ecology office along with a copy of this application
For all sections check the box next to each item as you complete it
III Project Description
Attach the following to your application
~ Description of your proposed project
~ Projected construction start and completion dates
~ Operating schedule and production rates
B List of all major process equipment with manufacturer and maximum rated capacity
B Process flow diagram with all emission points identified
Plan view site map
B Manufacturer specification sheets for major process equipment components
~ Manufacturer specification sheets for pollution control equipment
B Fuel specifications including type consumption (per hour and per year) and percent sulfur
IV State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Compliance
Check the appropriate box below
B SEPA review is complete Include a copy of the final SEPA checklist and SEPA determination (eg DNS MDNS EIS) with your application
~ SEP A review has not been conducted
sectI If SEP A review will be conducted by another agency list the agency You must provide a copy of the final SEP A checklist and SEP A determination before Ecology will issue your permit
Agency Reviewing SEP A
sectI If SEPA review will be conducted by Ecology fill out a SEPA checklist and submit it with your application You can find a SEP A checklist online at httpwwwecywagovprogramsseasepaformshtm
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 4 of 6
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
A notice of construction permit is required before installing a new source of air pollution or modifying an existing source of air pollution This application applies to facilities in Ecologys jurisdiction Submit this application for review of your project For general information about completing the application refer to Ecology Forms ECY 070-41 0a-g Instructions for Ecologys Notice of Construction Application
Ecology offers up to 2 hours of free pre-application help We encourage you to schedule a pre-application meeting with the contact person specified for the location of your proposal (see below) For more help than the initial 2 free hours submit Part 1 of the application and the application fee You may schedule a meeting with us at any point in the process
Completing the application enclose it with a check for the initial fee and mail to
WA Department of Ecology ~middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot I For Fiscal Office Use OnlyCashiering Unit I
001-NSR-216-0299-000404PO Box 47611 I
L--middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot-middot Olympia WA 98504-7611
Check the box for the location of your proposal For help call the contact listed below
Ecology Permitting Office Contact
Lynnette Haller Chelan Douglas Kittitas Klickitat or Okanogan County
(509) 457-7126 CRO Ecology Central Regional Office - Air Quality Program
lynnettehallerecywagov
Adams Asotin Columbia Ferry Franklin Jolaine Johnson
~ Garfield Grant Lincoln Pend Oreille Stevens (509) 329-3452
ERO Walla Walla or Whitman County jolainejohnsonecywagov
Ecology Eastern Regional Office - Air Quality Program
Dave Adler San Juan County
( 425) 649-7267 NWRO Ecology Northwest Regional Office - Air Quality Program
davidadlerecy wa gov
Kraft and Sulfite Paper Mills and Aluminum Smelters
JamesDeMayEcology Industrial Section- Waste 2 Resources Program (360) 407-6868
IND Permit manager jamesdemayecywagov
Phil Gent US Department of Energy Hanford Reservation
(509) 372-7983 NWP Ecology Nuclear Waste Program
Qhilgentecywagov
To request ADA accommodation call (360) 407-6800 711 (relay service) or 877-833-6341 (TTY)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 11 2016) Page 1 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
Check the box for the fee that applies to your application
New project or equipment
$1500 Basic project initial fee covers up to 16 hours ofreview
$10000 Complex project initial fee covers up to 106 hours of review
ti Change to an exis ng permit or eqmpmen t
$200 Administrative or simple change initial fee covers up to 3 hours of review
Ecology may determine your change is complex during completeness review ofyour application If your project is complex you must pay the additional $675 before we will continue working on your application
~ $875 Complex change initial fee covers up to 10 hours ofreview
$350 flat fee Replace or alter control technology equipment (JvAC 173-400-114)
Ecology will contact you ifwe determine your change belongs in another fee category You must pay the fee associated with that category before we will continue working on your application
Read each statement then check the box next to it to acknowledge that you agree
The initial fee you submitted may not cover the cost ofprocessing your application Ecology will ~ track the number ofhours spent on your project Ifthe number ofhours Ecology spends exceeds
the hours included in your initial fee Ecology will charge you $95 per hour for the extra time
~ You must include all information in this application Ecology may not process your application if it does not include all the information requested
~ Submittal ofthis application allows Ecology staff to inspect your facility
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 2 of 6
DCPARTMC~T OF
ECOLOGY Stti- of Wnhlntlan Notice of Construction Application
Part 1 General Information I middotmiddotbullbullProiectFacility aiid Company Information
1 Project Name Adminstrative Permit Changes 2 Facility Name Snake River Terminal 3 Facility Street Address 671 Tank Farm Rd Pasco WA 99301 4 Facility Legal Description
5 Company Legal Name (if different than Facility Name) Tidewater Terminal Company 6 Company Mailing Address (street city state zip) 671 TankFarmRdPasco WA99301
1 Facility Contact Name (who will be on-site) RonMcClarv 2 Facility Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address)
3 Facility Contact Phone Number 14 Facility Contact Email 509-54 7-7701 ronmtidewatercom 5 Billing Contact Name (who should receive billing information) Accounts Payable 6 Billing Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address) PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 7 Billing Contact Phone Number 18 Billing Contact Email (360) 693-1491 aotidewatercom
9 Consultant Name ( optional - if 3rd party hired to complete application)
10 Consultant OrganizationCompany
11 Consultant Mailing Address (street city state zip)
12 Consultant Phone Number 113 Consultant Email
14 Responsible Official Name and Title (person responsible for project policy or decision-making) William H Collins - Director EHSampS 15 Responsible Official Mailing Address PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 16 Responsible Official Phone 117 Responsible Official Email (3 60) 693-1491 bill collinslaltidewater com 18 Responsible Official Certification and Signature I certify that the information on thi~plication is accurate and complete
Signature Al~ j_ ~ - Date IL(ar- i
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 3 of 6
ECOLOGY ir ~YJhmtr Notice of Construction Application
Part 2 Technical Information
The Technical Information may be sent with this application to the Ecology Cashiering Unit or may be sent directly to the appropriate Ecology office along with a copy of this application
For all sections check the box next to each item as you complete it
III Project Description
Attach the following to your application
~ Description of your proposed project
~ Projected construction start and completion dates
~ Operating schedule and production rates
B List of all major process equipment with manufacturer and maximum rated capacity
B Process flow diagram with all emission points identified
Plan view site map
B Manufacturer specification sheets for major process equipment components
~ Manufacturer specification sheets for pollution control equipment
B Fuel specifications including type consumption (per hour and per year) and percent sulfur
IV State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Compliance
Check the appropriate box below
B SEPA review is complete Include a copy of the final SEPA checklist and SEPA determination (eg DNS MDNS EIS) with your application
~ SEP A review has not been conducted
sectI If SEP A review will be conducted by another agency list the agency You must provide a copy of the final SEP A checklist and SEP A determination before Ecology will issue your permit
Agency Reviewing SEP A
sectI If SEPA review will be conducted by Ecology fill out a SEPA checklist and submit it with your application You can find a SEP A checklist online at httpwwwecywagovprogramsseasepaformshtm
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 4 of 6
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
Check the box for the fee that applies to your application
New project or equipment
$1500 Basic project initial fee covers up to 16 hours ofreview
$10000 Complex project initial fee covers up to 106 hours of review
ti Change to an exis ng permit or eqmpmen t
$200 Administrative or simple change initial fee covers up to 3 hours of review
Ecology may determine your change is complex during completeness review ofyour application If your project is complex you must pay the additional $675 before we will continue working on your application
~ $875 Complex change initial fee covers up to 10 hours ofreview
$350 flat fee Replace or alter control technology equipment (JvAC 173-400-114)
Ecology will contact you ifwe determine your change belongs in another fee category You must pay the fee associated with that category before we will continue working on your application
Read each statement then check the box next to it to acknowledge that you agree
The initial fee you submitted may not cover the cost ofprocessing your application Ecology will ~ track the number ofhours spent on your project Ifthe number ofhours Ecology spends exceeds
the hours included in your initial fee Ecology will charge you $95 per hour for the extra time
~ You must include all information in this application Ecology may not process your application if it does not include all the information requested
~ Submittal ofthis application allows Ecology staff to inspect your facility
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 2 of 6
DCPARTMC~T OF
ECOLOGY Stti- of Wnhlntlan Notice of Construction Application
Part 1 General Information I middotmiddotbullbullProiectFacility aiid Company Information
1 Project Name Adminstrative Permit Changes 2 Facility Name Snake River Terminal 3 Facility Street Address 671 Tank Farm Rd Pasco WA 99301 4 Facility Legal Description
5 Company Legal Name (if different than Facility Name) Tidewater Terminal Company 6 Company Mailing Address (street city state zip) 671 TankFarmRdPasco WA99301
1 Facility Contact Name (who will be on-site) RonMcClarv 2 Facility Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address)
3 Facility Contact Phone Number 14 Facility Contact Email 509-54 7-7701 ronmtidewatercom 5 Billing Contact Name (who should receive billing information) Accounts Payable 6 Billing Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address) PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 7 Billing Contact Phone Number 18 Billing Contact Email (360) 693-1491 aotidewatercom
9 Consultant Name ( optional - if 3rd party hired to complete application)
10 Consultant OrganizationCompany
11 Consultant Mailing Address (street city state zip)
12 Consultant Phone Number 113 Consultant Email
14 Responsible Official Name and Title (person responsible for project policy or decision-making) William H Collins - Director EHSampS 15 Responsible Official Mailing Address PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 16 Responsible Official Phone 117 Responsible Official Email (3 60) 693-1491 bill collinslaltidewater com 18 Responsible Official Certification and Signature I certify that the information on thi~plication is accurate and complete
Signature Al~ j_ ~ - Date IL(ar- i
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 3 of 6
ECOLOGY ir ~YJhmtr Notice of Construction Application
Part 2 Technical Information
The Technical Information may be sent with this application to the Ecology Cashiering Unit or may be sent directly to the appropriate Ecology office along with a copy of this application
For all sections check the box next to each item as you complete it
III Project Description
Attach the following to your application
~ Description of your proposed project
~ Projected construction start and completion dates
~ Operating schedule and production rates
B List of all major process equipment with manufacturer and maximum rated capacity
B Process flow diagram with all emission points identified
Plan view site map
B Manufacturer specification sheets for major process equipment components
~ Manufacturer specification sheets for pollution control equipment
B Fuel specifications including type consumption (per hour and per year) and percent sulfur
IV State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Compliance
Check the appropriate box below
B SEPA review is complete Include a copy of the final SEPA checklist and SEPA determination (eg DNS MDNS EIS) with your application
~ SEP A review has not been conducted
sectI If SEP A review will be conducted by another agency list the agency You must provide a copy of the final SEP A checklist and SEP A determination before Ecology will issue your permit
Agency Reviewing SEP A
sectI If SEPA review will be conducted by Ecology fill out a SEPA checklist and submit it with your application You can find a SEP A checklist online at httpwwwecywagovprogramsseasepaformshtm
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 4 of 6
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
DCPARTMC~T OF
ECOLOGY Stti- of Wnhlntlan Notice of Construction Application
Part 1 General Information I middotmiddotbullbullProiectFacility aiid Company Information
1 Project Name Adminstrative Permit Changes 2 Facility Name Snake River Terminal 3 Facility Street Address 671 Tank Farm Rd Pasco WA 99301 4 Facility Legal Description
5 Company Legal Name (if different than Facility Name) Tidewater Terminal Company 6 Company Mailing Address (street city state zip) 671 TankFarmRdPasco WA99301
1 Facility Contact Name (who will be on-site) RonMcClarv 2 Facility Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address)
3 Facility Contact Phone Number 14 Facility Contact Email 509-54 7-7701 ronmtidewatercom 5 Billing Contact Name (who should receive billing information) Accounts Payable 6 Billing Contact Mailing Address (if different than Company Mailing Address) PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 7 Billing Contact Phone Number 18 Billing Contact Email (360) 693-1491 aotidewatercom
9 Consultant Name ( optional - if 3rd party hired to complete application)
10 Consultant OrganizationCompany
11 Consultant Mailing Address (street city state zip)
12 Consultant Phone Number 113 Consultant Email
14 Responsible Official Name and Title (person responsible for project policy or decision-making) William H Collins - Director EHSampS 15 Responsible Official Mailing Address PO Box 1210 Vancouver WA 98666 16 Responsible Official Phone 117 Responsible Official Email (3 60) 693-1491 bill collinslaltidewater com 18 Responsible Official Certification and Signature I certify that the information on thi~plication is accurate and complete
Signature Al~ j_ ~ - Date IL(ar- i
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 3 of 6
ECOLOGY ir ~YJhmtr Notice of Construction Application
Part 2 Technical Information
The Technical Information may be sent with this application to the Ecology Cashiering Unit or may be sent directly to the appropriate Ecology office along with a copy of this application
For all sections check the box next to each item as you complete it
III Project Description
Attach the following to your application
~ Description of your proposed project
~ Projected construction start and completion dates
~ Operating schedule and production rates
B List of all major process equipment with manufacturer and maximum rated capacity
B Process flow diagram with all emission points identified
Plan view site map
B Manufacturer specification sheets for major process equipment components
~ Manufacturer specification sheets for pollution control equipment
B Fuel specifications including type consumption (per hour and per year) and percent sulfur
IV State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Compliance
Check the appropriate box below
B SEPA review is complete Include a copy of the final SEPA checklist and SEPA determination (eg DNS MDNS EIS) with your application
~ SEP A review has not been conducted
sectI If SEP A review will be conducted by another agency list the agency You must provide a copy of the final SEP A checklist and SEP A determination before Ecology will issue your permit
Agency Reviewing SEP A
sectI If SEPA review will be conducted by Ecology fill out a SEPA checklist and submit it with your application You can find a SEP A checklist online at httpwwwecywagovprogramsseasepaformshtm
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 4 of 6
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
ECOLOGY ir ~YJhmtr Notice of Construction Application
Part 2 Technical Information
The Technical Information may be sent with this application to the Ecology Cashiering Unit or may be sent directly to the appropriate Ecology office along with a copy of this application
For all sections check the box next to each item as you complete it
III Project Description
Attach the following to your application
~ Description of your proposed project
~ Projected construction start and completion dates
~ Operating schedule and production rates
B List of all major process equipment with manufacturer and maximum rated capacity
B Process flow diagram with all emission points identified
Plan view site map
B Manufacturer specification sheets for major process equipment components
~ Manufacturer specification sheets for pollution control equipment
B Fuel specifications including type consumption (per hour and per year) and percent sulfur
IV State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Compliance
Check the appropriate box below
B SEPA review is complete Include a copy of the final SEPA checklist and SEPA determination (eg DNS MDNS EIS) with your application
~ SEP A review has not been conducted
sectI If SEP A review will be conducted by another agency list the agency You must provide a copy of the final SEP A checklist and SEP A determination before Ecology will issue your permit
Agency Reviewing SEP A
sectI If SEPA review will be conducted by Ecology fill out a SEPA checklist and submit it with your application You can find a SEP A checklist online at httpwwwecywagovprogramsseasepaformshtm
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 4 of 6
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
tFgt-ltWfMi~-middot (F
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
V Emissions Estimations of Criteria Pollutants
Does your project generate air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your air pollutant emissions
18] Air pollutants emitted such as carbon monoxide (CO2) lead (Pb) nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ozone (03) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) particulate matter (PM2s PM10 TSP) sulfur dioxide (SO2)
18] Potential emissions of criteria air pollutants in tons per hour tons per day and tons per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VI Emissions Estimations of Toxic Air Pollutants
Does your project generate toxic air pollutant emissions 18] Yes D No
Ifyes provide the following information about your toxic air pollutant emissions
18] Toxic air pollutants emitted (specified in WAC 173-460-1501)
18] Potential emissions of toxic air pollutants in pounds per hour pounds per day and pounds per year (include calculations)
18] Fugitive toxic air pollutant emissions - pollutant and quantity
VII Emission Standard Compliance
Does your project comply with all applicable standards identified 18] Yes D No
B Provide a list of all applicable new source performance standards national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories and emission standards adopted under the Washington Clean Air Act Chapter 7094 RCW
VIII Best Available Control Technology
B Provide a complete evaluation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for your proposal
1 httpappslegwagovW ACdefaultaspxcite=l 73-460-150
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 5 of 6
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
ECOLOGY Notice of Construction Application
IX Ambient Air Impacts Analyses
Does your project cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or acceptable source impact level D Yes ~ No
Provide the following
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for criteria air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Ambient air impacts analyses for toxic air pollutants (including fugitive emissions)
~ Discharge point data for each point included in ambient air impacts analyses (include only if modeling is required)
D Exhaust height
D Exhaust inside dimensions ( diameter or length and width)
D Exhaust gas velocity or volumetric flow rate
D Exhaust gas exit temperature
D Volumetric flow rate
D Discharge description (ie vertically or horizontally) and ifthere are any obstructions (eg raincap)
D Emission unit(s) discharging from the point
D Distance from the stack to the nearest property line
D Emission unit building height width and length
D Height oftallest building on-site or in the vicinity and the nearest distance ofthat building to the exhaust
D Facility location (urban or rural)
ECY 070-410 (Rev 112016) Page 6 of 6
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Emissions Summary This sheet summarizes emissions the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
EMISSIONS (tonsyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations middot middot
Ethanol Truck - Loadinq Rack Fuqitives 009 --- --- 0000345
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 028 033 083 000105
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 028 379 480 000105
Total Current 065 412 563 000244 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 013 --- --- 0000484
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 039 046 116 000147
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 026 360 480 0000997 Total Proposed 078 406 597 000295 iEotal Change in Emissions 013 -006 033 0000505
EMISSIONS (lbyear)
voes NOx co TAP Current Shipping Limitations bullmiddotmiddot
bullmiddotbull
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183 --- --- 069
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556 660 1660 210
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557 7589 9607 210
Total Current 1297 8249 11267 489 Proposed Shjpping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 256 --- --- 097
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779 924 2324 294
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529 7205 9607 199 Total Proposed 1564 8129 11931 590 motal Change in Emissions 268 -120 664 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 1 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Rfver Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives This sheet calculates loading rack fugitive losses for VOCs in pounds for ethanol and VCU loading for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) E = LL x Q and
LL = 1246 X S X P X M T where
E = voe vapor displacement rate (tons) LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months S = Liquid loading saturation factor P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole) T = Average bulk liquid temperature (degrees R)
and FL= Ex FLF
where FL = Loading rack fugitive losses (tonsmonth) FLF = Fugitive losses factor (0013 for bottom loader with VCU and 100 for top loader no control system)
and EVCUL= E-FL
where
EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) Assumes NSPS Subpart XX efficiency of 987 (0013) (3) Ethanol P M and T data taken from Tanks 409d monthly estimate for Pasco Washington
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 20000000 Month s P(g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 1667 0353 0013 0005 0348 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 1667 0405 0013 0005 0400
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 1667 0481 0013 0006 0475 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 1667 0568 0013 0007 0561 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 1667 0679 0013 0009 0670 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 1667 0795 0013 0010 0785 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 1667 0921 0013 0012 0909
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 1667 0857 0013 0011 0846 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 1667 0692 0013 0009 0683
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 1667 0532 0013 0007 0525 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 1667 0411 0013 0005 0405 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 1667 0353 0013 0005 0349
Total 009
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 28000000 Month s p (g) M T LL Q E (tons) FLF (c) FL (tons) EVCUL (tons)
January 03804 4607 51601 0423 2333 0494 0013 0006 0487 February 04371 4607 51601 0486 2333 0567 0013 0007 0560
March 05186 4607 51601 0577 2333 0673 0013 0009 0664 April 06129 4607 51601 0682 2333 0795 0013 0010 0785 May 07322 4607 51601 0815 2333 0950 0013 0012 0938 June 08581 4607 51601 0955 2333 1114 0013 0014 1099 July 09930 4607 51601 1105 2333 1289 0013 0017 1272
August 09245 4607 51601 1028 2333 1200 0013 0016 1184 September 07464 4607 51601 0830 2333 0969 0013 0013 0956
October 05739 4607 51601 0638 2333 0745 0013 0010 0735 November 04431 4607 51601 0493 2333 0575 0013 0007 0568 December 03811 4607 51601 0424 2333 0495 0013 0006 0488
Total 013
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 2 of 7 1W2018
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - SnaKe River Terminal Notice ot Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU voe Losses This sheet calculates voe losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol loaded at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equation (a) E(VOC) = EVCUL (1-CE)
where E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons) EVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) - calculated on previous sheet CE = control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction effiiciency ()
Equations (b) E(NOx) = EVCUL EF(NOx) E(CO) = EVCUL EF(CO)
where E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Loading rates calculated on Loading Rack Fugitives sheet using loading loss equation from AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (b) Equals 96 From source test data report Cubix Test Report on Exhaust Emissions from a John Zink Vapor Combustion Unit Prepared for Tidewater Terminal Co Pasco Petroleum Distribution
Current Limit Proposed Limit Month EVCUL CE (b) E(VOC)
January 0348 96 001 February 0400 96 002
March 0475 96 002 April 0561 96 002 May 0670 96 003 June 0785 96 003 July 0909 96 004
August 0846 96 003 September 0683 96 003
October 0525 96 002 November 0405 96 002 December 0349 96 001
Total 028
Month EVCUL CE (bl E(VOC) January 0487 96 002 February 0560 96 002
March 0664 96 003 April 0785 96 003 May 0938 96 004 June 1099 96 004 July 1272 96 005
August 1184 96 005 September 0956 96 004
October 0735 96 003 November 0568 96 002 December 0488 96 002
Total 039
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 3 of 7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Truck - VCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the vapor combustion unit (VCU) based on ethanol at the loading rack for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 4 mgL loaded= 0033 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 10 mgL loaded = 0083 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 20000 0033 0083 033 083 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 28000 0033 0083 046 116
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 4 of7 11172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake Kiver Terminal Notice or Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - Marine Loading VCU Losses This sheet calculates VOC losses from the marine terminal vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations (1) LL= 1246xSxPxMT where
LL = Loading loss (lb 1000 gal loaded) S = Liquid loading saturation factor (05 for submerged barge loading) P = True vapor pressure at average loading temperature (psia) M = Vapor molecular weight (lblb-mole)
and EMVCUL = LL x Q
and E(VOC) = TVCUL (1-CE)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) Assume loading is equal across all months EMVCUL= Ethanol VCU loading rate (tons) CE= control efficiency vapor combustion unit destruction efficiency() E(VOC) = volatile organic compound losses from VCU (tons)
Notes (1) From AP-42 Section 52 Transportation and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids (2) John Zink voe destruction efficiency equals 99
Current Shipping Limitation (Permit Table 21 b) of 158110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 13176 139 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 13176 160 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 13176 190 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 13176 225 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 13176 268 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 13176 314 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 13176 364 99 004
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 13176 339 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 13176 274 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 13176 210 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 13176 162 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 13176 140 99 001
Total 028
Proposed Shipping Limitation of 150110000 Month s P (a) M T LL Q EMVCUL (tons) CE (b) E(VOC)
January 05 03804 4607 51601 0212 12509 132 99 001 February 05 04371 4607 51601 0243 12509 152 99 002
March 05 05186 4607 51601 0288 12509 180 99 002 April 05 06129 4607 51601 0341 12509 213 99 002 May 05 07322 4607 51601 0407 12509 255 99 003 June 05 08581 4607 51601 0477 12509 299 99 003 July 05 09930 4607 51601 0552 12509 345 99 003
August 05 09245 4607 51601 0514 12509 322 99 003 September 05 07464 4607 51601 0415 12509 260 99 003
October 05 05739 4607 51601 0319 12509 200 99 002 November 05 04431 4607 51601 0246 12509 154 99 002 December 05 03811 4607 51601 0212 12509 133 99 001
Total 026
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 5 of 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake River Terminal Notice of Construction Application Calculations
Ethanol Barge - MVCU NOx and CO Losses This sheet calculates NOx and CO losses from the marine vapor combustion unit (MVCU) for ethanol for the current and proposed ethanol shipping limitations
Equations E(NOx) = Q EF(NOx) E(CO) = Q EF(CO)
where Q = Loading rate (1000 galmonth) E(NOx) = nitrogen oxides losses from VCU (tons) E(CO) = carbon monoxide losses from VCU (tons) EF(NOx) = nitrogen oxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded) EF(CO) = carbon monoxide emission factor (lbs1000-gallons loaded)
Notes (a) Emission factors for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide provided by John Zink EF(NOx) = 015 lbMMBTU EF(CO) = 020 lbMMBTU Assume heat input rate= 470 MMBTU and barge loading rate= 147000 galhr=gt EF(NOx) = 0048 lbs1000-gallons loaded EF(CO) = 0064 lbs1000-gallons loaded
Q (1000-gallons) EF(NOx) (a) EF(CO) (a) E(NOx) E(CO) Current Ethanol Shipping Limitation 158110 0048 0064 379 506 IProposed Ethanol Shipping Limitation 150110 0048 0064 360 480
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 6 of7 1172018
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Tidewater Terminal Company - Snake k1ver Terminal Not11e of Construction Application Calculations
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP) This sheet calculates TAP emissions using VOC emissions (calculated in previous sheets and summarized below) and speciation profiles in weight percent Speciations profiles in liquid weight percent are based on worst-case speciations developed by Landau amp Associates and presented in Tables 3 and 4 in an April 2013 Tidewater NOC application The vapor-phase weight percentages for each TAP component in denatured ethanol were then developed by using Raoults Law based on the pure-component vapor pressures of each component following the calculation method from EPAs Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries (EPA 2011 )
Current Shipping Limitations
voes (lbyear)
Ethanol Truck - Loading Rack Fugitives 183
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 556
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 557
Total Current 1297 Proposed Shipping Limitations
Ethanol Truck - LoadinQ Rack Fugitives 256
Ethanol Truck - Vapor Combustion Unit 779
Ethanol Barge - Marine Vapor Combustion Unit 529
Total Proposed 1564 Total voe Increase 268
WAC 173-460-150 Emission Values
Pollutant Liquid
Weightfrac34 Vapor
Weightfrac34 Current (lbyr)
Proposed (lbyr)
Increase lbyr
De Minimis (lbavg period)
SQER(lb avg period)
Averaging Period
Benzene 007 0119 1547 1866 0319 0331 662 Year 13-Butadiene 0000045 000181 0023 0028 000484 00564 113 Year Cumene 0011 0000843 0011 0013 000226 263 526 24-hour Ethylbenzene 0075 00121 0156 0189 00323 384 768 Year Naphthalene 00208 00000854 0001 0001 0000229 0282 564 Year Styrene 000384 0000397 0005 0006 000106 591 118 24-hour Toluene 0388 0193 2501 3017 0516 329 657 24-hour Xylenes 0328 00497 0645 0778 0133 145 29 24-hour
TOTAL TAP 090 038 489 590 101
Ethanol Shipping Limitation Modification Page 7 of7 1172018
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
~
~~------ RELOCATEx~c~R1~rkFrncEbullmiddotmiddotmiddot _ _y===---- ~-J)~---_ (2) 65000 BARREL middot middot middot middot~
---~ ETHANOL TANKS ___--~ - -_ -__
~=------ ~~middot otaii~ ~ rmiddot-- r ~~-gt middotmiddot ~ 1 _ ) u ____
-==---==-~ j gt 4
lt
II ----- 7- -middot I
rns11G PETR0LEUM TAMS PARM
0 1rlr
~r ETHANOL BARGE LOADING (USE EXISTING GASOLINE
NA() friJgtJi -JJ--__Jo do LOADING CONNECTION amp FEE----~----- (1 ~ 8il)
TIDEWATER 420i16 r llIUIEUA PASCO WASHINGTON~~~ii~ 53r17 ISSU[DfORPCRUIT RRU wwo TT ( ) TIDEWfAJER L scuce SRT TERMINAL - RAIL EXPANSION PROJECT )iJffifl 111017 REVlirn PEF Clltt-lT RfJUfST wwo TT A_r w DUiLJ OVERALL SITE1-)~vfv tJ1)) 42618 REVISED TAHK LOCATION PER PAIN CES IWD TT TNANollTATION a T IIMINALe mes PLAN - ALTERNATE
HDREng1noorlnglnc oii-1_i_i[~
42616 42618 C-002A 3
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
-----_M w=~s=-m--=-~=__==m=_~-~-~
JfJl=bullSHOFTM PRI ARY SEL FOR s-rEtL INTERi~AL FL01~TING ROOFS The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal was
developed for steel internal floating roofs
where tight rim spaces are encountered
The MINI-SHOEtrade has excellent chemical
compatibility for nearly any product stored
in a floating roof tank when combined with
HMTs PTFE laminated flouropolymer vapor
barrier fabric
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal has an excellent
pressure-application system with multiple
points of pressure and custom hardened
steel that maintains a tight seal for years to
come
For a long lasting seal that has the ability to
operate in narrow rim spaces choose the
MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe Seal
Key benefits
The HMT MINI-SHOEtrade primary benefits include
Compatibility- compatible with virtually all stored products
Gap sealing - unparalleled pressure application system ensures tight sealing across the entire shoe
Working range - accommodates rim spaces as small as 25
Long life - key components made from custom-hardened stainless steel ensuring spring longevity and long-lasting seal performance
Maintenance-free operation - workhorse design and materials
Key design features
bull Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
bull Even pressure distribution across the entire shoe
bull Compatible with virtually all stored products when installed with PTFE vapor barrier
bull Designed to function with roofs in any position without imposing adverse loading on the roof
bull Premium fabrics for long-life and durability
bull Horizontal and vertical rim mounts
bull Available with secondary seal systems
bull Designed with guidance from EPA and local regulations
Drtprtinn IQ1 01d on rmiddot7nkat 1 t1rnoTMJ _~_~tli lJ J VW I - - - v t1s_ wwwhmttankcom
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Custom-hardened stainless spring steel
HMTs MINI-SHOE Primary Shoe Seal makes good economic and environmental sense for steel floating roofs Heres why
1 Designed for tight rim spaces
The innovative feature of this seal is the HMT
MINI-SHOEtrade Type Hanger Assembly It
successfully maintains positive gap sealing ability
while accommodating rim spaces as small as 25
The MINI-SHOEtrade Hanger Assembly combines
superior strength with exceptional corrosion
protection
2 Even pressure application
The MINI-SHOEtrade Seal was designed to have equal
force applied to the shoe in six contact points This
design ensures even pressure distribution and
allows the shoe to conform well to local anomalies
in shell roundness The MINI-SHOEtrade Primary Shoe
Seal is a long lasting seal that was designed to
function with the roof in any position without
imposing adverse loading on the roof
3 Handles a wide range of products
Seal compatibility is no longer a problem for such
hydrocarbons as benzene methanol toluene
naphtha MTBE ETBE or TAME The MINI-SHOEtrade
Primary Shoe Seal combined with HMTs PTFE
laminated fluoropolymer vapor barrier fabric is
resistant to virtually all products stored in floating
roof tanks
A critical ingredient in all our seals is the type of
stainless steel we use for pressure application This
steel purchased direct in mill-run quantities is
custom-hardened to our specification to maximize
spring stiffness and seal longevity While annealed
or off-the-shelf quarter-hard steel can lose its
spring HMT components will spring back and avoid
fatigue longer than any other seal on the market
This translates directly into longer life lower
maintenance and most importantly-no gapping
Industry-leading PTFE fabrics
The other area where HMT outperforms the rest is in
the quality and durability of our fabrics We offer a
variety of fabric choices depending on service
requirements Our standard PTFE fabrics are
laminated which are unsurpassed in terms of
durability impermeability and service life HMTs
fabrics will wear extremely well in even the most
aggressive services
Other benefits and options Bolt-on design for easy fast installation and repair
Channel style shoe hanger assembly accommodates all steel roofs
Designed to accommodate varying rim spaces 25 to 13
Works with both welded and riveted tank shells
Teflonreg materials contain additives to ensure the dissipation of static build-up
PTFE or polyurethane fabric options
Stainless steel bolting hardware
18 (12 mm) gauge stainless steel shoes specially designed for welded storage tank applications
HMT is the global leader in aboveground storage tank solutions HMTs global team of engineers project
managers and field personnel can assist with common challenges including ways to reduce emissions optimize
tank capacity reduce stranded inventory and engineer a tank system that exceeds safety standards and extends
maintenance intervals
HMTs full suite of tank products includes External Seal Systems - Internal Seal Systems - Drain and Floating
Suction Systems - Geodesic Domes - Skin and Pontoon IFRs - Full Contact IFRs - Emissions Reduction Devices
HMT LLC I 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 400 The Woodlands Texas 77380 ~~frac34~~-=== =~~-~lt1il~~ltWllltW~~gtgtfiltlPh+ 12816817000 I Fax+ 12814197689 J Locations worldwide ---- -TM
Visit us at wwwhmttankcom
1508 REV 4 MINI-SHOE is a trademark of HMT lnc Teflon is a Registered Trademark of DuPont
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
Internal Floating Roof Design Summary
EDLN Bid_126180877
Customer Tidewater
Location Pasco WA
Desc 90-0 Dia IFR
Component Sizes Thicknesses and Quantities I Weight ~ Deck Plate 01875 inches 36711 lbs () (I)
Cl cu Deck Legs 13 3 Sch 40 Pipe 1933 lbs (I) (I) Misc 0 lbs lt(C (I)
Deck Stiffening 0 lbs () Total Center Deck Weight 38644 lbs
cu (I) lt( C 0 0 C 0 0
Pontoon Bottom Plate 01875 Pontoon Top Plate 0 Outer Rim Plate 23 inches x 01875
Inner Rim Plate 20 inches x 01875 Bulkheads 525 feet 01875 Circ Truss Plates Required 0 Rafters 2 X 2 X 316 Posts 2 X 2 X 316 Misc
Pontoon Legs 15 Seal (Approximate)
Total Pontoon Area Weight
inches inches
inches
inches inches
na Qty 0 Qty 0
3 Sch 40 Pipe
10525 lbs 0 lbs
4084 lbs
3131 lbs 1004 lbs
lbs 0 lbs 0 lbs
7410 lbs 2230 lbs
4178 lbs 25153 lbs
Approx Internal Floating Roof Weight 63797 lbs
