north carolina healthful living leaders webinar may 29, 2013 3:30 – 4:30 p.m
DESCRIPTION
North Carolina Healthful Living Leaders Webinar May 29, 2013 3:30 – 4:30 p.m. Presenter. Les Spell Health/Physical Education/Athletics Consultant, NCDPI [email protected] 919-807-3637. TIPS. Question box Participants will be muted during the webinar unless presenting - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
North CarolinaHealthful Living Leaders Webinar
May 29, 20133:30 – 4:30 p.m.
Presenter
Les SpellHealth/Physical Education/Athletics Consultant, [email protected]
TIPS
• Question box– Participants will be muted during the webinar unless presenting
– Please use the question box
• Questions/Answers– Monitored and answered in question box and/or at the end of
webinar
• Follow-up– Presenter online at conclusion of webinar
– Email/phone
– Presentation posted on Website
Game Plan
• Congratulations
• Updates
• Professional Development
• Resources
Congratulations!
Congratulations to our School Health Champions for January, February, March, April, and May!
Congratulations!
Congratulations to North Carolina’s Southern District and National AAHPERD award winners for Health and Physical Education!
StateUpdates
State Updates
Educator Effectiveness Division
Formerly known as . . .
Educator Recruitment & Development Division
Visit www.ncpublicschools.org/educatoreffectiveness
to learn more
More Info: Dr. Lynne Johnson
Teachers Collaborate Statewide via #NCed Twitter Chat
• Bi-weekly
• Forum for NC educators to grow and develop their PLN
• Connect with other educators who have similar interests
The next chat is Tuesday, June 4, from 8:00-9:00 p.m. Topic: Advocating for and Meeting the Needs of Exceptional Children
Leads: Dr. Betsy Rosenbalm, Principal, Newton-Conover City Schools; Region 7 Principal of the Year and Brian Smith, Kindergarten Teacher, Catawba County Schools.
Visit https://www.smore.com/gg3f to learn more
Agenda For Institute
Educator Effectiveness
Modelwww.ncpublicschools.org/
effectiveness-model/
Standards 6 & 8
Teachers
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
Principals (and other Administrators)
1 65432 7 8Strategic Leadership
InstructionalLeadership
Cultural Leadership
Human Resource
Leadership
ManagerialLeadership
External Development
Leadership
Micro-political
Leadership
Academic Achievement
Leadership
Growth Model
Teachers
Principals
6Contribute to Academic
Success
Academic Achievement
Leadership8Academic Achievement
Leadership
Standard 6 and 8 are measures of
Growth
Teacher Ratings CategoriesRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲Teachers
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
5 Rating CategoriesNot Demonstrated
Developing
Proficient
Accomplished
Distinguished
3 Rating CategoriesDoes Not Meet Expected Growth
Meets Expected Growth
Exceeds Expected Growth
Ratings Rationale - MET Research - Standard 6 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
SuccessTeachers
Key Notes on Ratings• Every teacher is evaluated every year.
• Each standard and rating stands on its own (1 out of 6, not 1/6).
• Ratings are used to create professional development plans each year.
• Ratings are used to determine status.
Measures of Student Learning
6Contribute to Academic
Success
6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests
6 Common Exams
6 Career Technical Education Assessment
6 K-2 Literacy
6 Analysis of Student Work
Grade 36
Measures of Student Learning
6Contribute to Academic
Success
6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests
6 Common Exams
6 Career Technical Education Assessment
6 K-2 Literacy
6 Analysis of Student Work
Grade 36
Measures of Student Learning:Focus on Analysis of Student WorkAnalysis of Student Work is a process through which teachers collect student work samples from two different points in time, assess them for growth in relation to identified Clarifying Objectives, and submit them for “blind review” by other content experts in the state.
• Allows flexibility with:• Programs and instructional time• Supplies and resources• Standards of focus
• Uses online platform to complete process
Measures of Student Learning:Focus on Analysis of Student WorkHow is growth measured?
• Teachers select student work samples that are representative of their current teaching assignment.
• Blind review by content experts determines growth level and a rating category:
• Does Not Meet Expected Growth
• Meets Expected Growth
• Exceeds Expected Growth
Measures of Student Learning:Focus on Analysis of Student WorkWhen is this being implemented?
• Spring 2013 pilot with 100+ teachers → Year 1 Implementation in 2013 – 2014 forArts Education, Healthful Living and World Language Teachers
• Fall 2013 pilot with other areas, such as AP/IB and ESL
Status Rationale - MET Research - Standard 6 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
Ratings Status• Teachers
6 separate ratings to help teachers grow each year
• A single overall status that is determined once a teacher has three years of growth data to populate Standard 6
• Categories for Status
1. In Need of Improvement
2. Effective
3. Highly Effective
3-Year Rolling Average TeacherRationale - MET Research - Standard 6 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
6 6 6Year 1
2013-2014Year 2
2014-2015Year 3
2015-2016
Standard Standard Standard
• An educator receives an effectiveness status only once he or she has 3 years of data on Standard 6
• A 3-year rolling average of growth data from Standard 6 is used as part of determining overall status
Teacher StatusRationale - MET Research - Standard 6 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
In Need of Improvement
Effective Highly Effective
Standards 1-5In the year
Standard 6Three-year rolling average
6 6 62 years ago
1 year ago
Currentyear+ + /3)
)
1 5432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Any rating lower than proficient
And/Or
Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
Proficient or Higher
on Standards1-5
And
Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth
Accomplishedor Higher
on Standards1-5
And
Exceeds Expected Growth
Legislative Update
Healthy Youth Act
NationalUpdates
Professional
Development
Healthy Schools Institute
SAVE THE DAT E for the 2013 N C H ealthy S chools Institute. U niversity o f N or th C aro lina W ilm ing ton / W ilm ing ton, N C
R egistratio n in fo rm atio n and prog ram d etails co m ing soo n .
National PE Institute
NC Coaches Association Clinic
2013 Clinic and All-Star WeekJuly 22 - July 25, 2013
1101 Westover TerraceGreensboro, NC 27408Phone: 336.379.9095Fax: 336.379.0874
Email: [email protected]
Summer Institutes
2013
ChangeTeacherPractice
ChangeStudentOutcomes
HTTP://WWW.NCPUBLICSCHOOLS.ORG/PROFDEV/SUMMERINSTITUTES/2013/
North Carolina Summer Institutes
Learning Path
2011 2012 2013
WHAT
Focus: Internalizing a new SCOS
HOW
Focus: Planning how instruction needs to change
IMPROVING PRACTICE
Essential Standards
Focus: Reflecting, adjusting and improving after year one of implementation
Summer Institutes
Summer Institutes
Summer Institutes
SI 2013 Locations
Resources
Resources
• NCDPI Wikicentral
K-8 Standards
Quick Reference Guides for the NC Standard Course of Study
Building Local Capacity
NCDPI Contact Information
Les Spell
919-807-3637
NC Department of Public Instruction Division of K-12 Curriculum and Instruction
NC Healthy Schools Section
Please complete the RttT Webinar Survey
at http://go.ncsu.edu/webinarby
WednesdayJune 5, 2013
“The digital tools used during the course of this training have been helpful to some educators across the state. However, due to the rapidly changing digital environment, NCDPI does not represent nor endorse that these tools are the exclusive digital tools for the purposes outlined during the training.”
Healthful Living Wiki
http://hlnces.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/