nira ozark region - sam houston state universityglt002/reports to research sponsors... · 2009. 10....

National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association Membership Survey:

An Illustrative Summary of the Ozark Region

Prepared by:

Gene L. Theodori, Ph.D.

Coach/Rodeo Team Advisor Rural Sociology and Community Studies Program

Department of Recreation, Park & Tourism Sciences

Texas A&M University

January 2004

National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association: Ozark Region

2

Acknowledgement Support for this research was provided by a grant from the National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association. I wish to express my gratitude to the coaches and student members of the National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association. This project could not have been completed without your cooperation. I also want to extend a special thanks to Kathleen Schubert and Kathleen Banz. The technical assistance that you provided while collecting, coding, cleaning, and entering the survey data was invaluable. Thanks to both of you.


3

Preface This document provides an illustrative summary of the 2003 survey results obtained from National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association (NIRA) members located in the Ozark Region. Figures and tables are used to simplify presentation of the data. All data utilized in this paper were extracted from the 2003 NIRA Membership Survey data set. 2003 NIRA Membership Survey The 2003 NIRA Membership Survey data were collected via survey questionnaire during the fall of 2003. A survey questionnaire was included with each of the 2003 – 2004 membership application packets administered in the 11 NIRA Regions located within the United States of America (i.e., Big Sky Region, Central Plains Region, Central Rocky Mountain Region, Grand Canyon Region, Great Plains Region, Northwest Region, Ozark Region, Rocky Mountain Region, Southern Region, Southwest Region, and West Coast Region). Survey questionnaires were not included in the membership application packets dispensed in the Canadian Region. The survey instrument contained 54 questions and required approximately 30 minutes to complete. It was designed to measure the attitudes, opinions, current behaviors, and behavioral intentions of the NIRA membership regarding selected products, services, and name-brand merchandise. In addition, the survey questionnaire collected information on students’ educational status, rodeo background, and general sociodemographics, as well as the rodeo events that respondents regularly enter.


4

Students were instructed to complete the survey and return it with their membership application to the NIRA National Office. No additional communication regarding completion and return of the survey was made. Overall, 2,303 of the 3,123 NIRA members located within the surveyed regions returned their questionnaires.1 Eleven of the questionnaires were deemed unusable and excluded from the analysis. In sum, 2,292 useable surveys were received. This resulted in a 73% completion rate. Ozark Region A total of 244 of the 333 NIRA members from the Ozark Region completed and returned a useable survey (73% completion rate). These figures may be slightly suppressed due to the fact the respondent’s region was not identifiable on nine of the completed and returned surveys. Note All materials in this publication may be reproduced without permission of the author. However, a credit line would be appreciated. A suggested citation is: Theodori, Gene L. 2004. National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association Membership Survey: An Illustrative Summary of the Ozark Region. College Station, TX: Rural Sociology and Community Studies Program, Texas A&M University. 1 In the fall of 2003, student membership in the 11 NIRA Regions located within the United States of America totaled 3,123. Overall, NIRA membership totaled 3,233. This figure includes the 110 student members located in the Canadian Region.


5

Table 1

Distribution of respondents by College/University

(n = 244)

College/University n %Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College 3 1.2East Central Community College 13 5.3Faulkner State Community College 1 0.4Hinds Junior College 1 0.4Indiana University Southeast 1 0.4Michigan State University 4 1.6Mississippi State University 6 2.5Missouri Valley College 54 22.1Murray State University 50 20.5Northwest Mississippi Community College 7 2.9Northwestern Michigan College 1 0.4Pearl River Community College 1 0.4Southern Arkansas University 23 9.4Southwest Missouri State University 6 2.5University of Arkansas – Monticello 11 4.5University of Tennessee – Martin 40 16.4University of West Alabama 22 9.0


6

Figure 1

Distribution of respondents by State where graduated high school

(n = 236)

Alabama

Arkansas

ColoradoFloridaGeorgia

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iow a

Kansas

Kentucky

MichiganMinnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

North CarolinaOhio

Ok lahoma

PennsylvaniaSouth Dakota

Tennessee

TexasVirginia

Washington Wiscons in


7

Table 2

Distribution of respondents by State where graduated high school

(n = 236)

State n %

Alabama 11 4.7Arkansas 28 11.9Colorado 5 2.1Florida 2 0.8Georgia 5 2.1Idaho 1 0.4Illinois 11 4.7Indiana 8 3.4Iowa 5 2.1Kansas 4 1.7Kentucky 24 10.2Michigan 6 2.5Minnesota 2 0.8Mississippi 36 15.3Missouri 36 15.3Montana 1 0.4Nebraska 1 0.4North Carolina 2 0.8Ohio 6 2.5Oklahoma 3 1.3Pennsylvania 1 0.4South Dakota 1 0.4Tennessee 26 11.0Texas 2 0.8Virginia 3 1.3Washington 1 0.4Wisconsin 5 2.1


8

Figure 2

Gender (n = 241)

Female44.81%n=108Male

55.19%n=133


9

Figure 3

Age (n = 240)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

n=9

n=17

n=44

n=52

n=49

n=64

n=5

Mean 19.64Standard deviation 1.46


10

Figure 4

Ethnicity (n = 237)

American Indian1.69%n=4

Black o r African American0.42%n=1

Caucasian or Anglo American97.05%n=230

Hispanic0.84%n=2


11

Figure 5

Political ideology (n = 216)

Liberal5.56%n=12 Moderate-Liberal

6.94%n=15

Moderate57.41%n=124

Moderate-Conser vative12.50%n=27

Conservative17.59%n=38


12

Figure 6

Size of place where spent most of childhood

(n = 231)

In the countryside outside of any city or townA town or vi llag e of 10,000 or fewer peopleThe sub urbs of a city of 10,000 or moreA smaller ci ty o f 10,000 to 50,000A city of 50,000 or more people

56.28%n=130

18.61%n=43

3.46%n=8

14.29%n=33

7.36%n=17


13

Figure 7

Family’s 2002 total household income

(n = 210)

0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% 18% 21%

$90,000 or more

$80,000 to $89,999

$70,000 to $79,999

$60,000 to $69,999

$50,000 to $59,999

$40,000 to $49,999

$30,000 to $39,999

$20,000 to $29,999

$10,000 to $19,999

Under $9,999

n=46

n=22

n=21

n=20

n=24

n=27

n=24

n=10

n=8

n=8


14

Figure 8

Current student status (n = 237)

Graduate student1.69%n=4

Underg raduate student98.31%n=233


15

Figure 9

Year in college 2003 - 2004 (undergraduates)

(n = 232)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

5th yr undergraduate

4th yr undergraduate

3rd yr undergraduate

2nd yr undergraduate

1st yr undergraduate

n=10

n=38

n=51

n=49

n=84


16

Figure 10

Receiving scholarships or monetary awards

(n = 236)

Yes69.07%n=163

No30.93%n=73


17

Figure 11

Types of scholarships or monetary awards

01020304050607080

Perc

ent

Academic scholarship Athletic scholarshipRodeo club scholarship Other

* The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The breakdown for each type of scholarship or monetary award is as follows: academic scholarship (n = 58); athletic scholarship (n = 37); rodeo club scholarship (n = 80); other scholarships (n = 33).

** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


18

Figure 12

Year of NIRA eligibility in 2003 - 2004

(n = 238)

First year44.54%n=106

Second year24.79%n=59

Third year19.33%n=46

Fourth year11.34%n=27


19

Figure 13

Money won at NIRA rodeos during 2002 – 2003 season

(n = 120)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

$4,500 or more

$4,000 to $4,499

$3,500 to $3,999

$3,000 to $3,499

$2,500 to $2,999

$2,000 to $2,499

$1,500 to $1,999

$1,000 to $1,499

$500 to $999

Under $499

n=2

n=2

n=3

n=2

n=7

n=6

n=8

n=13

n=24

n=53


20

Figure 14

Competes in professional rodeo or professional bull riding

(n = 228)

Yes34.65%n=79

No65.35%n=149


21

Figure 15

Money won at professional rodeos or professional bull riding in 2002

(n = 77)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

$14,000 or more$13,000 to $13,999$12,000 to $12,999

$11,000 to $11,999$10,000 to $10,999

$9,000 to $9,999$8,000 to $8,999$7,000 to $7,999

$6,000 to $6,999$5,000 to $5,999$4,000 to $4,999$3,000 to $3,999$2,000 to $2,999

$1,000 to $1,999Under $999

n=4

n=1n=1n=1

n=3n=2

n=1n=4

n=3n=3

n=8

n=12n=34


22

Figure 16

Rodeoed in high school as a member of the National High School Rodeo

Association (n = 243)

Yes65.02%n=158

No34.98%n=85


23

Figure 17

Planning to rodeo after graduation (n = 234)

Yes97.86%n=229

No2.14%n=5


24

Figure 18

Events planning to regularly enter during the 2003 – 2004 college rodeo

season (Females)

0102030405060708090

Perc

ent

Barrel racing Breakaway roping Goat tying Team roping

* The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they plan to regularly enter each event is as follows: barrel racing (n = 91); breakaway roping (n = 56); goat tying (n = 35); team roping (n = 11).


25

Figure 19

Events planning to regularly enter during the 2003 – 2004 college rodeo

season (Males)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Per

cent

Bareback riding Bull riding Saddle bronc ridingCalf roping Steer wrestling Team roping

* The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they plan to regularly enter each event is as follows: bareback riding (n = 19); bull riding (n = 26); saddle bronc riding (n = 16); calf roping (n = 53); steer wrestling (n = 27); team roping (n = 81).


26

Figure 20

Network most often watch rodeo on television

(n = 197)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Other

Outdoor L ife Network

Outdoor Channel Network

TNT

TNN

NBC

FOX

ESPN 2

ESPN

CBS

ABC

n=4

n=65

n=26

n=5

n=28

n=6

n=5

n=30

n=22

n=2

n=4

* A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


27

Figure 21

Type of vehicle primarily used to travel to NIRA rodeos

(n = 232)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Recreational vehicle

Van

SUV

Car

Gasoline powered truck

Diesel powered truck

n=6

n=2

n=8

n=45

n=171


28

Figure 22

Make of vehicle primarily used to travel to NIRA rodeos

(n = 234)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Other

Toyota

GMC

Ford

Dodge

Chevrolet

n=3

n=1

n=10

n=107

n=78

n=35



29

Figure 23

Year of vehicle primarily used to travel to NIRA rodeos

(n = 228)

1978 1986 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 20030%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Perc

ent


30

Figure 24

Pulling a horse trailer to NIRA rodeos (n = 236)

Yes79.24%n=187

No20.76%n=49


31

Figure 25

Horse trailer has living quarters (n = 186)

Yes50.00%n=93

No50.00%n=93


32

Figure 26

Type of horse trailer that will primarily be used when traveling to NIRA

rodeos (n = 185)

Two-horse trailer9.73%n=18

Three-hor se trai ler47.57%n=88

Four-horse trailer35.14%n=65

Five-horse trai ler2.16%n=4

Six-horse trailer1.62%n=3

Other3.78%n=7



33

Figure 27

Make of horse trailer that will primarily be used when traveling to

NIRA rodeos (n = 181)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

OtherTrav elongTrailwest

TitanSundowner

SoonerKeifer4 Star

FeatherliteExiss

EliteCherokeeCharmac

C&MBloomer

n=58n=5

n=3n=12

n=19n=5

n=16n=16

n=14

n=10n=8

n=14n=1



34

Figure 28

Own and use a cellular telephone (n = 243)

Yes90.53%n=220

No9.47%n=23


35

Figure 29

Company that provides cellular telephone service

(n = 220)

Allte l5.91%n=13 AT&T

9.09%n=20

Cingular48.64%n=107

Verizon Wireless19.09%n=42

Other17.27%n=38



36

Figure 30

Brand name cellular telephone (n = 210)

Kyocera3.81%n=8

Motorola19.05%n=40

Nokia59.52%n=125

Verizon5.24%n=11

Other12.38%n=26



37

Figure 31

Own a desktop computer (n = 240)

Yes49.58%n=119

No50.42%n=121


38

Figure 32

Brand name desktop computer (n = 110)

Compaq10.91%n=12

De ll40.91%n=45

Gateway14.55%n=16

Hewlett Packard18.18%n=20

Other15.45%n=17



39

Figure 33

Own a laptop computer (n = 235)

Yes22.55%n=53

No77.45%n=182


40

Figure 34

Brand name laptop computer (n = 50)

Compaq14.00%n=7

De ll42.00%n=21Hewlett Packard

12.00%n=6

Toshiba12.00%n=6

Other20.00%n=10



41

Figure 35

Eat at Arby’s (n = 206)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week

More than once a week

n=42

n=70

n=31

n=39

n=11

n=13


42

Figure 36

Eat at Burger King (n = 207)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=39

n=61

n=26

n=47

n=20

n=14


43

Figure 37

Eat at Chick-Fil-A (n = 198)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=87

n=57

n=20

n=25

n=3

n=6


44

Figure 38

Eat at Dairy Queen (n = 199)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=44

n=66

n=29

n=40

n=11

n=9


45

Figure 39

Eat at Hardee’s (n = 205)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=42

n=78

n=33

n=30

n=10

n=12


46

Figure 40

Eat at Jack in the Box (n = 198)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=157

n=19

n=8

n=8

n=1

n=5


47

Figure 41

Eat at McDonalds (n = 212)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=17

n=33

n=31

n=58

n=35

n=38


48

Figure 42

Eat at Sonic Drive-In (n = 212)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=23

n=33

n=24

n=60

n=32

n=40


49

Figure 43

Eat at Taco Bell (n = 211)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=22

n=35

n=32

n=55

n=36

n=31


50

Figure 44

Eat at Taco Bueno (n = 194)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=162

n=14

n=4

n=8

n=2

n=4


51

Figure 45

Eat at Wendys (n = 205)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=25

n=46

n=28

n=58

n=26

n=22


52

Figure 46

Eat at Whataburger (n = 199)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Never

A few times a year

Once a month

A few times a month

Once a week


n=150

n=28

n=6

n=6

n=5

n=4


53

Figure 47

Average fast food restaurant visitation

0.00.30.60.91.21.5

1.82.12.42.73.0

Mea

n

Arby'sBurger KingChick-Fil-ADairy QueenHardee'sJack in the BoxMcDonaldsSonic Drive-InTaco BellTaco BuenoWendysWhataburger

* Coded using the following scale: 0 = never; 1 = a few times a year; 2 = once a month; 3 = a few times a month; 4 = once a week; 5 = more than once a week. Mean values: Arby’s = 1.74; Burger King = 1.95; Chick-Fil-A = 1.08; Dairy Queen = 1.67; Hardee’s = 1.63; Jack in the Box = 0.44; McDonalds = 2.83; Sonic Drive-In = 2.78; Taco Bell = 2.67; Taco Bueno = 0.38; Wendys = 2.39; Whataburger = 0.49.


54

Figure 48

Favorite fast food restaurant (n = 226)

0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% 18%

Whataburger

Wendys

Taco Bueno

Taco Bell

Sonic Driv e-In

McDonalds

Jack in the Box

Hardee's

Dairy Queen

Chick-Fil-A

Burger King

Arby's

n=3

n=45

n=29

n=42

n=24

n=3

n=4

n=5

n=18

n=19

n=34


55

Figure 49

Favorite brand of pizza (n = 231)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

I do not eat pizza

Pizza Inn

Pizza Hut

Papa Johns

Little Ceasars

Dominos

n=7

n=8

n=87

n=73

n=11

n=45


56

Figure 50

Favorite deli/sub shop (n = 236)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

I do not eat at deli/sub shops

Subway

Schlotzsky's

Quiznos

Blimpie's

n=10

n=182

n=10

n=23

n=11


57

Figure 51

Favorite fast food chicken restaurant (n = 238)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

I do not eat at fast food chicken restaurants

Popeye's Famous Fried Chicken

KFC

Church's Fried Chicken

n=42

n=35

n=153

n=8


58

Figure 52

Favorite soft drink (n = 223)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Other

Root Beer

Orange Soda

Ginger Ale

Sprite/Diet Sprite

7-Up/Diet 7-Up

Pepsi/Diet Pepsi

Mountain Dew/Diet Mountain Dew

Dr. Pepper/Diet Dr. Pepper

Coke/Diet Coke

n=12

n=4

n=3

n=14

n=1

n=19

n=62

n=67

n=41



59

Figure 53

Brand of cowboy boots most often purchased

(n = 245)

05

10152025303540

Perc

ent

Ariat Double H Justin Laredo Tony Lama Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Ariat (n = 72); Double H (n = 12); Justin (n = 78); Laredo (n = 11); Tony Lama (n = 23); Other (n = 49). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


60

Figure 54

Brand of cowboy boots most often purchased by gender

(females, n = 108; males, n = 134)

05

10152025303540

Females Males

Perc

ent

Ariat Double H Justin Laredo Tony Lama Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of female respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Ariat (n = 42); Double H (n = 2); Justin (n = 31); Laredo (n = 8); Tony Lama (n = 5); Other (n = 20). The number of male respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Ariat (n = 30); Double H (n = 10); Justin (n = 44); Laredo (n = 3); Tony Lama (n = 18); Other (n = 29). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


61

Table 3

Amount of money spent on cowboy boots in a typical yeara


Overall Females Males Mean $244.55 $197.58 ** $281.17 Standard Deviation $190.96 $164.87 $202.78 Mode $200.00

(n = 51) $200.00(n = 27)

$200.00(n = 24)

Minimum $0.00

(n = 12) $0.00

(n = 8) $0.00

(n = 4) Maximum $1000.00

(n = 3) $1000.00

(n = 1) $1000.00

(n = 2)

a Reported dollar figures exceeding $1000.00 were treated as missing values. ** Indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) between females and males.


62

Figure 55

Brand of cowboy hats most often purchased

(n = 196)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

ent

Bailey Resistol Stetson Wrangler Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Bailey (n = 22); Resistol (n = 97); Stetson (n = 39); Wrangler (n = 17); Other (n = 21). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


63

Figure 56

Brand of cowboy hats most often purchased by gender


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Females Males

Perc

ent

Bailey Resistol Stetson Wrangler Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of female respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Bailey (n = 8); Resistol (n = 38); Stetson (n = 16); Wrangler (n = 11); Other (n = 5). The number of male respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Bailey (n = 13); Resistol (n = 58); Stetson (n = 23); Wrangler (n = 6); Other (n = 16). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


64

Table 4

Amount of money spent on cowboy hats in a typical yeara


Overall Females Males Mean $143.03 $117.90 ** $160.42 Standard Deviation $114.78 $109.24 $114.49 Mode $100.00

(n = 55) $100.00(n = 24)

$100.00(n = 31)

Minimum $0.00

(n = 19) $0.00

(n = 14) $0.00

(n = 5) Maximum $500.00

(n = 7) $500.00

(n = 3) $500.00

(n = 4)

a Reported dollar figures exceeding $1000.00 were treated as missing values. ** Indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) between females and males.


65

Figure 57

Brand of jeans most often purchased (n = 270)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Perc

ent

Cinch Cruel Girl Lucky Wrangler/20X Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Cinch (n = 41); Cruel Girl (n = 56); Lucky (n = 9); Wrangler/20X (n = 148); Other (n = 16). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


66

Figure 58

Brand of jeans most often purchased by gender


010203040506070

Females Males

Perc

ent

Cinch Cruel Girl Lucky Wrangler/20X Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of female respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Cinch (n = 1); Cruel Girl (n = 55); Lucky (n = 5); Wrangler/20X (n = 52); Other (n = 7). The number of male respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Cinch (n = 40); Cruel Girl (n = 0); Lucky (n = 4); Wrangler/20X (n = 93); Other (n = 9). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


67

Table 5

Amount of money spent on jeans in a typical yeara


Overall Females Males Mean $241.98 $243.25 $242.23 Standard Deviation $192.67 $199.28 $189.35 Mode $200.00

(n = 62) $200.00(n = 23)

$200.00(n = 38)

Minimum $0.00

(n = 3) $0.00

(n = 1) $0.00

(n = 2) Maximum $1000.00

(n = 5) $1000.00

(n = 3) $1000.00

(n = 2)

a Reported dollar figures exceeding $1000.00 were treated as missing values.


68

Figure 59

Brand of western shirts most often purchased

(n = 227)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

ent

Cinch Cruel Girl Wrangler/20X Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Cinch (n = 57); Cruel Girl (n = 54); Wrangler/20X (n = 91); Other (n = 25). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


69

Figure 60

Brand of western shirts most often purchased by gender


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Females Males

Perc

ent

Cinch Cruel Girl Wrangler/20X Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of female respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Cinch (n = 1); Cruel Girl (n = 53); Wrangler/20X (n = 37); Other (n = 13). The number of male respondents who indicated that they purchased each brand is as follows: Cinch (n = 55); Cruel Girl (n = 0); Wrangler/20X (n = 53); Other (n = 12). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


70

Table 6

Amount of money spent on western shirts in a typical yeara



(n = 64) $100.00(n = 29)

$100.00(n = 35)

Minimum $0.00

(n = 6) $0.00

(n = 3) $0.00

(n = 3) Maximum $1000.00

(n = 3) $1000.00

(n = 2) $1000.00

(n = 1)



71

Figure 61

Overnight accommodation most often used when traveling to rodeos

(n = 219)

Camper6.39%n=14

Horse traile r w ith living quarte rs38.36%n=84

Hote l or mote l47.49%n=104

Other7.76%n=17



72

Figure 62

Preference of major national hotels/motels

(n = 183)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Perc

ent

Best Western Days Inn Holiday Inn Super 8 Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of respondents who indicated that they preferred each hotel/motel is as follows: Best Western (n = 37); Days Inn (n = 21); Holiday Inn (n = 58); Super 8 (n = 16); Other (n = 51). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


73

Figure 63

Preference of major national hotels/motels by gender


05

101520253035

Females Males

Perc

ent

Best Western Days Inn Holiday Inn Super 8 Other * The total percentage exceeds 100% due to multiple responses. The number of female respondents who indicated that they preferred each hotel/motel is as follows: Best Western (n = 17); Days Inn (n = 6); Holiday Inn (n = 28); Super 8 (n = 5); Other (n = 26). The number of male respondents who indicated that they preferred each hotel/motel is as follows: Best Western (n = 19); Days Inn (n = 15); Holiday Inn (n = 30); Super 8 (n = 11); Other (n = 24). ** A complete list of “Other” responses is available upon request from the author.


74

Table 7

Amount of money spent in either hotels or motels in a typical yeara



(n = 29) $0.00

(n = 14) $0.00

(n = 15) Minimum $0.00

(n = 29) $0.00

(n = 14) $0.00

(n = 15) Maximum $6000.00

(n = 1) $6000.00

(n = 1) $4000.00

(n = 1)



75

Figure 64

Made a purchase because of advertisement seen in

Collegiate Arena (n = 235)

Yes18.30%n=43

No81.70%n=192


76

Figure 65

Would purchase a product from NIRA’s national sponsor even if

product was more expensive (n = 235)

Yes64.26%n=151

No35.74%n=84


77

Address correspondence to: Gene L. Theodori, Rural Sociology and Community Studies Program, Department of Recreation, Park & Tourism Sciences, Texas

A&M University, 2261 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2261; [email protected]

nira ozark region - sam houston state universityglt002/reports to research sponsors... · 2009. 10....

Documents