nic robotics progress report two · nic robotics project progress report two 19th december 2014 sam...

70
NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19 th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

     

NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 

 

Sam Wilson 

NIC Robotics Project Manager 

 

 

 

 

   

Page 2: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

 

 2 

Contents 

1 Document Control .................................................................................................................................. 3 

2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 4 

2.1 Risks to Project Delivery .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Learning Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 

3 Project Managers Report ........................................................................................................................ 8 

3.1 Previous Six Months – 19.06.2014 to 19.12.2014 ....................................................................................... 9 3.2 Targets for the next six months – 19.12.2014 – 19.06.2015 ..................................................................... 14 

4 Consistency with Full Submission ......................................................................................................... 18 

5 Risk Management ................................................................................................................................ 18 

6 Successful Delivery Reward Criteria ...................................................................................................... 19 

7 Learning Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 19 

7.1 Dissemination ............................................................................................................................................ 20 

8 Business Case Update ........................................................................................................................... 23 

9 Progress against Plan ............................................................................................................................ 23 

10 Progress against Budget ..................................................................................................................... 24 

11 Bank Account ..................................................................................................................................... 25 

12 Intellectual Property Rights ................................................................................................................ 27 

13 Other .................................................................................................................................................. 27 

13.1 Company Rebranding .............................................................................................................................. 27 

14 Accuracy Assurance Statement ........................................................................................................... 28 

 

Appendix A – ULC Progress Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………29 

Appendix B – RPS Progress Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………44 

Appendix C – Risk Register – v2.2 – 10.12.2014…………………..…………………………………………………………….……62 

Appendix D – ULC Progress Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………68 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 4: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 4 

2 Ththsupa

Thfol

Thattto 

Siprde

Thiddeapsplailea

Ath

  

Project 

 Execue purpose oe 19th June mmary of thrtner, and R

e aim of the lowing func

Element 1 repair and i

Element 2 for tier 2 a

Element 3 

Element 4 

e project aitempt to recustomers. 

nce the last oject plan aliverables is 

Successful 

Creation of 

Creation of 

The projectblog facilit

Promotion 

Manufactu

e past six mentifying kesign of the propriate vecifications d out in the ading compa

nother key ae robotic pla

Progress Rep

tive Sumf this docum2014 and thee progress mPS as the tec

Robotics protions: 

– Developmenspection de

– Developmend tier 3 pipe

– Robotic vis

– Automated

ms to realise duce traffic co

project progrnd budget, sushown below

delivery of SD

detailed des

both the init

 website has 

of the projec

re of a test ri

onths have s suppliers anoperating sysendors who aand the targeproject plannies have be

rea has beentform and th

port Two 

mmary ent is to re key deliveramade from Schnical cons

oject is to d

ent of a robevices for ti

ent of an intee 

ual and non

d live asset r

the benefitongestion, 

ress report uccessfully dw, a breakd

DRC9.3 – Sou

sign and fab

tial concept

s been publi

ct at the 20

ig and pipe 

seen the prond the requistem.  One oare capable oet price. Thi. Multiple veen brought 

n the develohe repair m

ort on the pables over tGN, with subultant.  

evelop a rob

tic ‘platformer 2 and tier 

ernal mecha

‐visual inspe

eplacement 

s of these mverall excav

was publisheelivering eacown of each 

urce Vendo  

rication spec

ual designs, 

shed and con

4 Low Carbo

samples sou

ject progressrements of tf the most cof supplying s has been aendors were in to the pro

pment from codule develo

rogress the he next six bsequent re

otic system 

m’ and launc3 pipe 

nical joint in

ction 

for distribut

ethods on cation foot p

d the projecch milestoncan be foun

r for Sensors 

cification for 

and subseq

ntains all pr

on Network 

rced from th

s from the inhe system, tritical aspecthe types ochieved sucidentified foject.  

conceptual dped under E

project has mmonths of theports from U

to be used i

h system to 

stallation m

ion services 

ertain gas oprint, inspecti

t has progree and targetsd throughou

(E3) 

the robotic 

uent 3D desig

oject detail, 

and Innovati

e live netwo

nitial researchrough to tts of the prof sensors reqcessfully andollowing a wo

designs thro1 & E2, show

made since te project. TheLC Robotics 

n a live gas m

enable deplo

odule and 

and mains f

erations (tieon time and 

ssed as plans listed in PPRt this repor

tool head (E

gn of the lau

a document 

on Conferen

ork for contro

h and concehe exciting stject to date wuired in line  within the porldwide sea

ugh to the fiwn in Figure 

 19th

the last subme report conas the princ

main to perf

oyment of m

Weco seal re

or tier 1 mai

er 2‐3 gas m general inc

ned in line R1. A list of .  

1 & E2) 

unch tube 

library, ani

nce (LCNI Co

olled testing 

ptual designtage of defiwas to idenwith agreeprojected tiarch, and a n

nal fabricati1 below. 

h December 2

mission on tains a iple project 

orm the 

odular 

pair method 

ns 

ains) in an onvenience 

with the the key 

mations and 

nference) 

 phases, ning the tify d mescales umber of 

on design of 

2014 

Page 5: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 6: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 7: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 7 

2.In anprdide

NdeInbu(hev

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project 

2  Learninline with PPd external. oject results ssemination monstratin

otable dissetail on all asternal sharinsiness throuttp://www.lent. 

Progress Rep

ng SummaR1, the projeThe goal of thand methodmodes, ensug the way  kn

mination actipects of the g with key cogh bimonthlcniconferenc

port Two 

ary ect learning he project dds. The plan uring transpnowledge is 

vities since project, a blontacts inclly steering grce.org/) and 

outcomes wsseminationdetails the farency and edisseminate

PPR1 includeog facility auding the staroup meetinpresentatio

ill be dividen plan is to eormat and tieffective cod between t

e the creationd links to coakeholder tegs. Attendan of the proj

d into two cansure accesmescales of 

mmunication hese two gr

n and publicontact the pram and key dnce at the LCect in the Cu

tegories of dsibility to, anthe internal with all stak

oups can be s

ation of the roject team department CNI Conferenustomer Imp

 19th

disseminatid dissemina and externkeholders. A see on page 

website, cowith any quheads thronce acts session 

h December 2

on: internal tion of the al plan 20. 

ntaining eries. ughout the 

at the 

2014 

Page 8: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 9: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 10: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 11: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 12: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 13: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 14: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 15: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 16: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 17: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 17

IdScA utimmRi

To arthfoanas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project 

entify how tore (MRPS) key outcomlised to proanagement pains across sk Model. 

ensure the ranged a woe types of dr Tier 2 & 3 y immediatset life.  

Progress Rep

he data provpackage e of the projevide a true reprocess similGB will need t

Figure 19

project teamrkshop with ata currentlymains. The me action is req

port Two 

vided by the

ect is to deteflection of ar to the Mto be create

9 – Graphical

m have a firkey asset in, and where 

model will nequired to rem

e sensor payl

ermine how tasset conditiRPS (Mains Rd. Figure 19

summary of

m understantegrity enginthe data caped to give a mediate pip

load can be 

the data beion. A methRisk Prioritisshows the 

f the main 

ding of how neers from Sptured by thclear indicae barrel, an

integrated i

ng produceod of integraation Score) ey factors th

MRPS risk mo

the existing rGN and its exe sensor pation of the led the frequen

n to the Mai

d by the sensting the dataused for Tierhat currently

del for Tier 1

risk model wxternal consckage can infvel risk assoncy of future

 19th

ins Prioritis

sor module a in to an asr 1 (2” to 8”  contribute 

 

1 pipes 

works, SGN hultants to difluence a siociated with e surveys to 

h December 2

ation Risk 

can be set metallic) to the MRPS

ave scuss how 

milar model the asset, if prolong the 

2014 

Page 18: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 18

4 At w

 

5 At nube Se Oreby vepr Ca Ocoansea thE3  O As plchlo La FoEliteUprcado  

     1h

Project 

 Consisthis stage oebsite1.  

 Risk this stage omber of chalow: 

lection of v

ne of the higmotely in thULC in to thndors has rocess and th

pabilities of 

ne of the mommunicatiod the sensoparate the ospecialised te design of operations. 

peration of t

mentioned atforms has ange has bewest rating. 

unch tube d

r early versiements 1, 2 m due to theLC from the ovided confilculated. Thecumentatio

                      

ttps://www.o

Progress Rep

tency wf the project 

Managemf the project nges have b

endors for se

hest risks to e challenginge available tesulted in sate chosen tec

the tether fo

st challenginn, consumabr module in operation of tether for eaceach tether hBoth remain

he Robot in a

above, the dresulted in cen documen

evelopment 

ons of the ris& 3. For reviee criticality oLarge CISBOTdence that te next key ren has been p

                      

fgem.gov.uk/o

port Two 

with Fulthere are n

ment there are neen made si

nsors – Orig

the project g environmetechnology atisfactory michnology ca

or E1, E2 & 

ng aspects ofble supply aone tether. the repair mch function has been divin low risk it

a live gas ma

decision to shanges to tted in the ri

– Original Sc

sk register tew v1.9 it wof the launcT operation, he final desieview of the produced in 

           

ofgem‐public

l Submio variances 

o risks abovnce the last 

inal Score 10

at its comment of a live gnd supplierstigation of thn be found i

E3 – Original 

f the tether nd functionahe complexodule and sewhich share ded in to tms. 

ain – Origina

eparate the ohe complexitsk register, b

core – Risk n

he launch tuas agreed thh tube on thand the delign will operalaunch tube January 2015

ations/84774/

ssion to the Full S

e the green, PPR submis

0 – Current 

encement wgas main, to s, and the suhe risk and an the Projec

 Score 5 – C

design is col strength toity of the teensor modulkey charactwo separate i

l Score 8 – 

operation oy of the desbut no chan

ot listed as 

be specificaat this item e system opevery of the ate effectivwill be con5. 

/gasnicsubmi

ubmission do

low risk catesion, a sum

Score 5 

as the abilitythe agreed tbsequent se reduction int Managers R

urrent Score

mbining all o cover the fther design we to two seeristics to be tems on the 

Current Score

f the repair aign and the oge has been m

a standalone

ion was coveneeded to beration. The 3D design foely. As a resuducted when 

ssionfromsco

ocument pub

egory on the mary of the m

y to identify aarget price. Tlection of prn its score. DReport sectio

s 5 

f the requireunctionality owas a key facparate transdeveloped. register, item

e 8 

nd sensor moperation of made to the 

 item – Cur

ered by the de listed on thexperience gr the launch lt; a low ris  the detailed

tiagasnetwork

 19th

blished on th

project risk main change

a technologThe researcrimary and sDetail of the on. 

ed power, of the repairctor when dport platforTo cover them 22 for E2,

module betweach procerisk score 

ent Score 4 

design capahe register agained by botube by UL level has bd manufactu

ks‐robotics.p

h December 2

he Ofgem 

register. A s are listed 

y to be used h conducted econdary selection 

r module eciding to ms, allowing e change, and 23 for 

een two ss. This which is at its 

bilities for s a separateoth SGN and C has een ring 

df  

2014 

 

Page 19: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 19

6 ThOfse

 Tprre

 

S

9.

9.

9.

9.

9.

9.

9.

9.

Th

ht

 

7 Thmopnawith

At thjeanplfo

Fiin

 

 

 

Project 

 Succee SDRC 9.1 gem on 27th ction of this 

he next SDRoject progreport or any 

DRC 

e full SDRC 

tps://www.

 Learnie main outpethods to asportunities tional and inll be dissemie project. 

present a lae IPR conditiopardise the d SGN. This anned after tund in secti

gure 21 sumternally and 

Progress Rep

ssful Dereport was suJuly 2014. Areport. 

C due, reportss report. Atof the remain

Due 

28/03/2014 

14/12/2015 

27/08/2014 

03/08/2015 

17/04/2017 

04/12/2015 

04/12/2015 

13/10/2017 

breakdown c

ofgem.gov.uk

ng Outcuts of this prsess and remgenerated bynternational nated so tha

rge proportions concerncommercialhas been facthe expectedon 12 of this 

marises the kexternally.  

port Two 

livery uccessfully sA summary o

t 9.4 will be s this time thning SDRC’s. 

Descriptio

Developm

Developm

Source ve

Configura

Tapping a

Launch rob

Launch rob

Launch rob

can be viewe

k/ofgem‐pu

comes roject are thmediate the ey this projecstandard boat the techno

on of the ding the desi aspects of tctored in to td approval dreport. 

key learning 

eward ubmitted of the conten

submitted inere are no o

ent of conc

ent of conc

ndor for sen

ion of testin

nd fitting too

bot (Elemen

bot (Elemen

bot (Elemen

Figure 2

d using this 

blications/8

e technical existing gas dt are succesdies, acadeology can be 

sign work angn. Dissemihe system, the Stakeholate of the pa

outcomes t

Criterian 25th April 2t of SDRC9.

n August 201outstanding 

eptual desig

eptual desig

sor (Elemen

g with robo

ol validation 

t 1&2) 

t 3) 

t 4) 

0 – Table of 

 

link below:

5427/projec

and engineedistribution sfully dissemia, local au incorporat

nd specificatnation of thiand impact der engageatents. An u

o date, and 

 014 and SDR3 can be foun

5 (see Figurerisks which c

ns (Element 1

n (Element 4

t 3) 

tic platform 

(Element 4)

SDRCs 

tdirectionfor

ring knowlenetwork. The

minated for Gthorities aned by all GB G

ion can’t be s informationon the financment plan, pdate on the

how they hav

RC 9.3 was sund in the Pro

e 20) and covould impact 

1&2) 

(Element 3) 

roboticsincl.

dge gained werefore it is eB GDN’s, thed other key stGDNs upon s

shared with n prior to pacial return to ith the majo IPR conditio

ve been dis

 19th

uccessfully soject Manag

vered in the on the deliv

Statu

.projectplanv

whilst researessential the wider gas takeholderssuccessful c

 external patent approvo the GB gas ority of key eons of the pr

eminated bo

h December 2

ubmitted to ers Report 

next very of this 

Submitted 

On target 

Submitted 

On target 

On target 

On target 

On target 

On target 

v2.pdf 

ching new at learning community, . Learning ompletion of 

rties due to al could consumer vents roject can be

oth 

2014 

Page 20: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 20

Ke

D

Re

D

Se

Pr

 

 

In

N

St

Pu

Pr

In

 

 

Ex

LCto 

Pu

Pu

Pr

 

 

 

 

7.Thhuto thpr

Project 

y Learning O

evelopment o

search into 

evelopment o

paration of 

actical testi

ternal Disse

aming comp

eering grou

blication of 

ovision of ro

novation pie

ternal Disse

NI Conferengas industry

blication of 

blication of 

ovision of ro

1  Dissee project tegely succesa wide rangee general reesenting the

Progress Rep

Outcomes 

of launch tub

sensor suppl

of a tether g

the sensor an

ng of a transp

mination 

etition – eng

p meetings – 

robotics web

botics email

ce in compa

mination 

ce – promoty personnel 

reports on O

robotics web

botics email

Figure 21 –

mination am attendedsful and allowe of stakehosponse to the Robotics co

port Two 

be conceptu

liers and ap

uide and inc

nd repair m

port platfor

aging with a

to obtain su

bsite – so m

 address – to

ny team bri

ing the prog

Ofgem and S

bsite – allow

 address – to

– Key learni

d the LCNI cwed the Roblders. The pe project wncept at th

al design 

plication of 

orporation i

odules into 

m to transpo

ll members o

pport from a

embers can a

o provide a d

ef to inform t

ress of the p

GN websites 

ing anyone t

o provide a d

ng outcomes

nference alotics team troject team rs one of ent conference

equipment a

nto the laun

distinct oper

rt a ‘payloa

of the busin

all areas of t

access infor

direct line of 

the wider b

project and 

 – highlighti

to access pr

direct line of 

s and the wa

ong with theo showcase received pothusiasm and.  

nd technolo

ch tube desi

ations with t

d’ inside a liv

ess to submi

he business

mation 

communica

usiness 

making the p

ng the progr

oject detail a

communica

ys they hav

 rest of the Ia project ovsitive and cod interest. Fi

gy in a live ga

gn 

heir own tet

e gas main 

t a name for

tion to the p

roject team 

ess to date 

nd view prog

tion to the p

e been dissem

nnovation terview and anstructive fgure 22 show

 19th

as main 

ther 

r the robot 

project team 

available fo

gress 

project team 

minated 

eam. This evan info‐film teedback frows the Proje

h December 2

r inquiries 

ent was o reach out m GDNs and ct Manager 

2014 

Page 21: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 22: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 22

NThww

PrcatwJulLethbeot

SpD

Thexbewith

 

Project 

ational Joint e 2014 NJUere awarded orks with ro

ior to the strried out tho excavatioy 2014 utiliarning from e systems wincorporather network

eaking at thepartment f

is view was pected to into find new ll be througat is needed 

Progress Rep

Utility GrouG street workthe prestigio

botics techno

art of the NICe first live fiens in Woolwising the Largethe trial andhich are beined whenevers to assist wi

e NJUG Awaor Transport,

echoed by Bcrease by 43ways of minh innovation to do this.” 

port Two 

p (NJUG) Aks awards cous Outstanology (Figur

C Robotics pld trial of thich, London. e CISBOT syd the commeng developer possible in ith use of th

rds, Robert G described 

ob Gallienn3 per cent, sonimising disrand collabo 

Figure 23 –

wards eremony wading Contribe 24).  

Figure 2

roject, SGN we system. ThThe successtem on Castrcialisation d under the the design ofe system.  

Goodwill Mobotics as a 

e, NJUG CEO o the challenuption to roaration, and I 

 the Robotic

 

s held at the bution to Str

24 – NJUG A

worked withe aim was ts of the trial t Iron main sof a robotic NIC project hf the syste

P, the Parlia‘game‐chan

who said: “ge facing utad users. Th believe SG

          

s website 

House of Coeet Works aw

wards 

ULC on the o remediate led to a 9.1kizes from 18platform whhas been ext

m. All of the k

mentary Undger’.  

Between 201ilities, local e only way thN’s CISBOT sy

ommons in Nward for prev

 

NIA Large CI370m of 24”m commerci” to 30” acrich shares optremely benenowledge ha

er‐Secretary

10 and 2040authorities anhe industry wystem will d

 19th

November anvious and on

SBOT projec” Cast Iron pial package oss SGN’s nperational sieficial and leas been shar

y of State at 

, traffic on ond their conwill meet thieliver the st

h December 2

nd SGN n‐going 

ct and ipe from starting in etwork. milarities to arning will red with the 

the 

ur roads is tractors will s challenge ep‐change 

2014 

Page 23: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 23

ReFodeGiNpr

Thhide

 

8 At rech

  

9 At Re

ThhiRo

BoPP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project 

view and Sr the 2014 velop a robven the succGT asked ouojects.  

e SGN NIC rghlighting thtermine ass

copy of the l

 Businpresent theport, or the anges will b

 Progrepresent the ports from 

e RPS reportghlights any botics has a

oth of these R Summary 

Progress Rep

upport of NaNetwork Innootics solutioness of SGN wr company to

obotics teamere will the pet integrity a

etter sent to

ess Casere are no chatarget pricese required. 

ess againproject is prboth RPS and

t condenses concerns or lso provided

reports can bReport). 

port Two 

tional Grid Tovation Comn to perform with roboticso review thei

m reviewed thpotential foand our willin

o NGT can b

e Updatanges to thes set. The Ro

nst Plarogressing ind ULC Roboti

and summaareas of int a condense

be found in 

Transmissiopetition Natthe survey a

s previously, r proposal 

he proposal r some sharngness to sh

e found in th

e  business cabotics team 

n  line with thcs confirm t

rizes the PPRerest in the pd report as 

Appendix B (

n 2014 NIC ional Grid Trand maintenand in winnnd ensure t

document aed learning, are this info

e appendice

se that was believes tha

e project sche successf

R from their project they the principal 

RPS PPR Sum

Bid ransmission ance of higing funding here is no du

nd issued wparticularly irmation wh

s of this repo

submitted int over the ne

hedule agreul progressio

point of viewfeel needs tproject par

mmary Repo

(NGT) submih pressure trfor this projeuplication wit

ritten suppon relation to en appropria

ort (Appendi

n the full suext six mont

ed as part of n of the pro

w as our techo be monitortner. 

rt) and App

 19th

itted a propansmission ect for the 2th funding f

rt for the N the sensorsate. 

ix D). 

mission proh reporting 

the project ject to date. 

hnical consured closely. 

endix A (ULC 

h December 2

osal to pipelines. 013 NIC bid, or the two 

GT’s project,  used to 

‐forma period; no 

direction. 

ltants and ULC 

Robotics 

2014 

Page 24: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 25: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 26: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 27: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 27

1In onnoke

As plUwi

SGcothre

 

1

1ThThco

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thwiw

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project 

2  Intellaccordance  intellectual t have any IPy parts of th

reported in atform (EleSPTO on the ll be assigne

N are commnsumer. Wite IPR is not gistered, SG

3  Othe

3.1  Compe business hese rebrandmparing the 

e robotics pth the new ebsite was d

Progress Rep

ectual Pwith the Gasproperty rigPR to report e system is c

the previousment 1), repa30th of Aprild to SGN. 

mitted to protth this in minat risk. This hN will proact

any Rebraas begun theing guideline logos shown

roject team brand to provelayed to allo

port Two 

Properts Network Inghts (IPR) beion.  Additiocompleted.   

s period, a pir module (El 2014.  In ac

tecting the Ind we are cohas been builtively dissem

anding e rollout of es formed thn in Figure 2

Figure 29 

is working vide a clear, ow it to be l

y Rightnovation Cng pursued fnal filings ar

rovisional palement 2) anccordance w

PR of the prntrolling thet in to the Stinate detail 

he new brae basis for th9 

– The SGN a

ith the businconsistent maunched wit

s ompetition Gfor the proje anticipate

atent applicand sensor mith the NIC 

oject which e level of dettakeholder where appr

nd which wilhe project l

nd Robotics 

ness to ensumessage for h the rebra

overnance Dect.  In this red in early 20

ation for the odule (ElemeProject Agre

will potentiaail released Engagement opriate. 

l be ongoingogo develop

new brandin

re that all cour stakeholnded SGN we

Document, Ueporting per15 when th

selected coent 3) has bement, the 

lly be of greain to the pubplan, and as

 over the nment. This ca

ng logos 

ommunicatioders. The puebsite in Nov

 19th

ULC Robotics riod, ULC Robe final desig

ncept of the een filed witon‐provision

at benefit tblic domain s soon as pa

xt couple of an be seen b

on material iublication of vember 201

h December 2

will report botics does n of several 

transport h the nal patent 

o the GB gas to ensure tents are 

years. y 

s in‐keeping the project 4. 

2014 

Page 28: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 29: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 29

A

Project 

ppendi

Progress Rep

x A ‐ UL

port Two 

LC Progrress Report 

 19thh December 22014 

Page 30: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 31: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

9 Dec 2014

Conten

Revision

Referenc

Executive

Summary

Eleme

Launch

Eleme

Consisten

Risk Man

Progress

Key Learn

Eleme

Eleme

| Project Progre

nts

History ........

ced Documen

e Summary ...

y of Progress

nt 1&2 .........

h System ......

nt 3 ..............

ncy with Full

nagement .....

Against Plan

ning Outcome

nt 1&2 .........

nt 3 ..............

CONFIDENTess Report Conten

.....................

ts .................

.....................

by Element ..

.....................

.....................

.....................

Submission ..

.....................

& Budget .....

es .................

.....................

.....................

TIAL INFORMnt for SGN

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

MATION – NO

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

OT FOR PUBLI

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

IC RELEASE

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

1

................ 2

................ 2

................ 3

................ 4

................ 4

................ 4

................ 4

................ 5

................ 5

................ 5

................ 6

................ 6

.............. 10

Page 32: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 33: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

9 Dec 2014

ExecuThe objetechnolorepair lemanagemproject, Uhas beento date stakehold

ULC Roboreport (JuSince theon schedfollowingaccomplimodule being masensor tfinalized.completeretrievingthe launc The projereport, amanagerelectricalbeing uti

| Project Progre

tive Sumective of the ogies which caeaking mechment processULC Roboticsn matured froare a direct ders, namely

otics has beeune 2014), ale start of the dule, which nog the submissished in this r(Element 2) anufactured. esting has ta. The manued the initial g the roboticch system wil

ect is fully stan additional

r. All team ml engineer shilized as well

CONFIDENTess Report Conten

mmary NIC Robotic

an operate inanical joints ses by provids is excited toom concept t

result of an SGN, the pro

n under contl milestones wproject and

ow includes tsion of this rereporting perhave been c The researc

aken place, ufacturing of design of the

c system froml also start in

affed with deengineer was

members are hould be join on an as ne

TIAL INFORMnt for SGN

cs project is side live gas d

and failed ding enhance

o report that to prototype

excellent leoject sponsor

ract since Febwere achieveas of the datwo SDRC mileeport. Includriod. The detompleted anch for the sevendors werthe sensor

e launch system the live gas

early 2015.

edicated engis added to thfull-time and

ning the teameeded basis.

MATION – NO

to develop ndistribution mWeco seals,

ed inspectiona new, innovmanufacturinvel of collaband RPS, the

bruary 2014. ed on schedulte of this repoestones. The

ding the SDRCtailed design

nd the prototensor modulere selected arobot will be

em which is re mains during

ineering pershe team, whicd dedicated tm soon. Add

A detailed s

OT FOR PUBLI

new, cutting mains. This ne, but will an capabilities

vative and comng. The succ

boration and project tech

Since the sule, including Sort, all fourte

ere are two mC, several sign

of the transptype system e (Element 3and the sensegin as scheesponsible fog normal dai

sonnel. Sincech now consiso the NIC Ro

ditional resouummary of t

IC RELEASE

edge robotiew technologlso support s. In the firmmercially viess and achieattention tonical service

ubmission of tSDRC 9.3 (Soueen milestone

more milestonnificant technport platformfor 24” diam) was complsor robot deduled in ear

or safely and ely operations

e the submissst of a total o

obotics projecurces such asthe project’s

c repair and gy will not on

the pipe frrst nine moniable robotic evements of

o detail from provider.

the last projeurce Vendor fes have beenes for 2014 t

nical achievemm (Element 1)meter mains

eted, severaesign is currerly 2015. ULefficiently laus. The manuf

sion of the laof six engineect. An additi sensor consprogress and

3

inspection ly remotely

racture risk nths of this

technology the project all project

ect progress for Sensor).

n submitted hat are due ments were ) and repair is currently l rounds of ently being LC has also unching and facturing of

ast progress ers and one onal senior

sultants are d upcoming

Page 34: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

9 Dec 2014

objectiveof the de

SummElement The deveproblems2014 wadesigneduse of thdiameterplaced foreceived.on sched

Launch SThe deveAfter comconcepturetrievingfacilitate Septembexplore aThe initiathe projethe detadocumen Summary

• I• I• M• D• C• 3• U

Element The deveThe concis currensystem, tmonths o

| Project Progre

es are given inesigns have be

mary of P1&2

elopment of s or areas of s matured, re

d to enter 24”he modular fer gas mains. or all critical l. All fabricat

dule by 13 Feb

System elopment of tmpleting theual design forg the robotic operations w

ber 8th 2014. and improve al design for tect specificatails of the lntation that is

y of Element Initial ElectricInitial 3D DesMechanical SDevelopmentCreation of D3D Design of User Interface

3 elopment of tceptual designntly being finathe robotic syof research, i

CONFIDENTess Report Conten

n this report.een detailed

rogress b

the transpoconcern. Th

eviewed and ” diameter g

eatures of theManufacturilong lead comion of manufbruary 2015.

the launch sy launch syste

r an efficient system. Pot

was also com Following ththe concepts

the launch sysions and wasaunch systes due on the

1&2 Milestoc Schematic Dsign of Transppecification Dt of Conceptu

Detailed FabricMechanical Ce and Contro

the sensor mon of the sensoalized. Throuystem can bento sensor te

TIAL INFORMnt for SGN

. What we’vein all project

by Eleme

ort platform he conceptua

finalized. Thas mains hase system, theng of the repmponents. Mfactured parts

stem is curreem specificatand robust la

tential concepmpleted. The

he acceptancs until an initstem was bees matured thm design in16th of Januar

ones This PeriDesign and Paport Platform,Document Deual Designs (Lcation & MfgComponents l System Des

odule is curreor robot (Elemugh scaling oe configured technology are

MATION – NO

e learned, oumilestone rep

nt

and repair mal design of thhe manufactus been comple robotic systepair robot is cMany custom s will be com

ently on schedtion documeaunching systpts for the suconceptual d

ce of the contial design foen completedrough design

n preparationry 2015.

od (includes arts Selection,, 18 July 2014evelopment (Launch Tube),. Documenta(Launch Tubeign and Progr

ently on schement 1&3) prof key parts ato accommod

eas for Eleme

OT FOR PUBLI

r developmeports.

module is cuhe repair roburing documeeted. Throuem can be cocurrently in and off the s

mpleted, and a

dule with no nt in August tem that will

upporting madesign was prnceptual desigor the systemd in accordann, analysis ann for comple

Launch Syste, 27 June 201

4 Launch Tube) 29 August 20tion (Robotic

e), 21 Novemramming, 26

dule with no resented in Apand effectivedate 12 to 48

ent 3, a down

IC RELEASE

nt approach

urrently on sbot (Element entation for gh scaling of

onfigured to aprogress. Purshelf componall off the she

major proble2014, ULC R

provide a mchinery and e

resented to Sgn work, ULC

m was complece with the red testing. Ueting the ne

em): 4

), 1 August 20014 c Platform), 10ber 2014 December 14

major problepril 2014 was use of the m

8” diameter g-selection pro

and the intric

chedule with1&2) presenta robotic sys

f key parts anaccommodatrchase ordersnents have alelf parts will b

ems or areas Robotics comeans of dispaequipment n

SGN & RPS in C immediateleted in Novemequirements LC is currentecessary man

014

0 October 20

4 (on-schedul

ems or areas s matured, revmodular featgas mains. Afocess was car

4

cate details

h no major ted in April

stem that is nd effective e 12 to 48”

s have been ready been be received

of concern. mpleted the atching and ecessary to London on

ly began to mber 2014. set forth in ly finalizing nufacturing

14

e)

of concern. viewed and ures of the fter several rried out to

Page 35: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 36: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 37: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 38: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 39: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 40: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 41: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 42: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 43: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 44: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 45: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

rpsgroup.com/ireland

Document Control Sheet

This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of the Client. It is provided for sole use of the Client and its professional advisors. Information disclosed should be treated as being strictly private and confidential. Any use which a third party makes of this document, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. No responsibility is accepted by RPS for the use of this Document, in whole or in part, for any other purpose.

Client: SGN

Project Title: Network Innovation Competition (NIC) Robotic Solutions

Document Title: Project Progress Report Update 2

Document No: MDR1025Rp013

Text Pages: 15 Appendices: 0

Rev. Status Date Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By

F02 Final 11

th December,

2014

Ian MacHugh

David Phelan

Mark Phelan

David Phelan

Ciarán Butler

PJ Rudden

Ofgem Project Progress Report Update 2

Page 46: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2

MDR1025Rp013 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3

2 PROGRESS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4

2.1 ELEMENT 1 .................................................................................................................................... 6

2.2 ELEMENT 2 .................................................................................................................................... 7

2.3 ELEMENT 3 .................................................................................................................................... 7

2.4 ELEMENT 4 .................................................................................................................................... 8

3 KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES ............................................................................................... 9

4 CONSISTENCY WITH FULL SUBMISSION PRO-FORMA ....................................................... 11

5 RISK MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 13

6 KEY TARGETS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE NEXT 6 MONTHS ............................................... 14

7 CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................................... 15

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1: Table of Reports by RPS ........................................................................................................ 4 Table 2-2: Face to Face Project Team Meetings .................................................................................... 6 Table 3-1: Robot Configurations, Entry-hole Requirements & Estimated Launch Tube size ............... 10

Page 47: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 48: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2

MDR1025Rp013 2

Finalising the design of the sensor module followed by parts fabrication, assembly and integration with the robotic platform.

Carry out the internal testing of the launch system testing including retrieval & travel testing and seal repair tool testing.

Identify and select suitable live gas mains for use as field trial sites.

Page 49: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2

MDR1025Rp013 3

1 INTRODUCTION

This project progress report provides an update of work completed since the last progress report submitted to Ofgem. The key areas to which RPS is providing an update on are as follows:

Progress of each element against plan and budget;

Key learning outcomes,

Consistency with full submission,

Risk management,

Key objectives for the next six months. RPS input towards robotics innovation development RPS was appointed by SGN in February 2014 to provide a range of services including on the project such as:

Technical review and gap analysis of conceptual designs and manufacturing design against SGN, UK and European Standards and legislation.

Due diligence and project appraisal

Strategic development planning

Provision of technical assessments and advisory services

Provision of support and assistance for the provision of field trial testing.

Assist on technical input for Mains Risk Prioritisation System (MRPS)

Risk management

Multidisciplinary engineering design

Page 50: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 51: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 52: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 53: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 54: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2

MDR1025Rp013 8

Extensive consideration has been given to all specifications associated with the sensor module, with parameters requiring additional research and testing being identified.

Existing sensor technologies are being researched in detail and that there is communication with component manufacturers.

SGN has sourced pipe samples and shipped them to United States for testing by ULC. Analysis of the tests carried out will inform the project team of what can/cannot be done including the level of detail (i.e. extent of survey required versus ‘value proposition’) that can be used to inform the MRPS.

Overall, it appears that ULC is progressing well with Element 3. They are managing the sourcing of possible sensor vendors and are currently on schedule. There are a number of key areas the development of the Element 3 must achieve in order to progress:

1. ULC must successfully be able to design a sensor module using the selected sensor technologies that can be commercially reproducible. There are currently a number of unknowns regarding the sensor module mechanical specification that need to be confirmed.

2. Operation of the sensor module will be relevant to SGN’s operational objective with respect to pipe risk management. The overarching goal is to devise a practical sensor module that can identify primary pipe defects that will provide the most informative and meaningful set of measurements to assess mains integrity while meeting the cost target outlined in the Full Submission Pro-forma.

A key risk regarding the sensor module development is to make sure that there is no delay in the project programme as there are a number of reporting milestones to be achieved and the sensor package is due for procurement and testing in March 2015. This is an important Go/No-Go Milestone.

2.4 ELEMENT 4

Element 4 involves automated live asset replacement for smaller distribution pipes. Work is due to begin on this Element in July 2015.

Page 55: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 56: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 57: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 58: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 59: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager
Page 60: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2

MDR1025Rp013 14

6 KEY TARGETS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE NEXT 6 MONTHS

The key targets for the next six months involve:

1. Fabrication of parts for the robotic platform and joint repair module.

2. Assemble the robotic platform and joint repair module and carry out preliminary functional testing.

3. Develop and assemble the launch system prototype, including completing the final design and parts fabrication stages.

4. Finalise the design of the sensor module.

5. Parts fabrication and assembly of the sensor module and integration with the robotic platform.

6. Carry out the internal testing of the launch system, robotic platform launch including retrieval & travel testing and seal repair tool testing.

7. Identify and select suitable live gas mains for use as field trial sites. This will involve obtaining the necessary permits to conduct the field trials and the meeting the required health & safety criteria.

8. A MPRS workshop will be held to determine how sensor data can be incorporated into the risk model.

9. Structural assessments to be performed to determine the risks associated with installing the launch tube on the gas mains.

10. While no SDRC milestones are scheduled over the next 6 months, there are a number of SDRC milestones in the following 6 month period and consideration will be given to these during the next 6 months to ensure that these are adequately prepared for.

Page 61: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2

MDR1025Rp013 15

7 CERTIFICATION

It has been decided to seek CE marking for both the robotic systems and launch tube developed under this project. This decision was made on the basis that obtaining this marking is a form of quality assurance whereby independent testing confirms that the systems comply with the various applicable European Standards. It will greatly aid the integration of these robotic systems onto the market should this project be successful. The applicable Directives include:

Pressure Equipment Directive (Directive 97/23/EC),

Machinery Directive (Directive 2006/42/EC),

Electromagnetic Compatibility Directive (Directive 2004/108/EC),

Low Voltage Directive (Directive 2006/95/EC),

ATEX Directive (Directive 94/9/EC).

Investigation is currently underway into the Directives to check if the conformity tests are required to be carried out by an independent Notified Body or whether they can be done by the manufacturer. This varies for different Directives. Depending on these requirements, the UK Conformity Assessment Bodies (notified bodies, recognised third party organisations and user inspectorates) will be assessed for each applicable Directive to assess who can best provide the relevant conformity assessment tests.

Page 62: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 62

A

Project 

ppendi

Progress Rep

x C ‐ Ris

port Two 

sk Register – v2.2 ‐ 11.12.2014 

 19thh December 22014 

Page 63: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

Scoring Key

16-25 10-15 1-9

Likelih

ood

Impact

Score

Likelih

ood

Impact

Score

1

Insufficient Resources 

Insufficient resources assigned to the NIC Project Manager and/or 

ULC's Director of Research and Development. SGN unable to 

resource personnel for on‐site management and management of 

SCO procedures.

Time / 

Financial3 3 9

A ‐ Regular resource review at monthly innovation group meeting.

B ‐ Implement and maintain a project programme to monitor deliverables 

against the timescales and ensure that any shortage of resources impacting 

delivery of the overall project are clearly identified. Review programme at 

monthly progress meetings. 

C ‐  ULC Robotics to contract additional staff to the project.                                   

D ‐  SGN to identify dedicated resources to undertake site management and 

management of SCO procedures. 

E ‐ RPS has assigned committed resources to carry out technical advisory of 

the NIC Robotics Project. 

A‐ SW

B ‐ SW

C ‐ AM                      

D ‐ AM                     

E ‐ DP

Ongoing N/A 1 3 3

2

Local Authorities Communication for E1,2&3                                            

SGN unable to obtain notices from Local Authorities to allow work on 

the highway.  

Time / 

Financial2 4 8

A ‐ SGN to liaise with Local Authorities as early as possible to expedite the 

process.

B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer 

where necessary to support engagement with customers. 

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW & SG10/04/2015 54 1 4 4

3

Local Authorities Communication for E4                                                     

SGN unable to obtain notices from Local Authorities to allow work on 

the highway                                                                                                       

Time / 

Financial2 4 8

A ‐ SGN to liaise with Local Authorities as early as possible to expedite the 

process.

B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer 

where necessary to support engagement with customers. 

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW & SG17/02/2017 228 1 4 4

4

Stakeholder Opposition for Elements 1,2&3                                              

Has the potential to influence the public's perception of the project. 

This could lead to a negative response if not handled appropriately; 

conversely can result in a very positive response. 

Reputation  1 4 4

A ‐ Implement and maintain a  stakeholder management plan.

B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer to 

ensure high level engagement with customers as early as possible. This will 

allow our stakeholders to understand exactly what we are aiming to achieve 

and what the benefits are. 

A ‐ SW & SG

B ‐ SW & AM & 

SG

Ongoing N/A 1 4 4

5

Stakeholder Opposition for Element 4                                                        

Has the potential to influence the public's perception of the project. 

This could lead to a negative response if not handled appropriately; 

conversely can result in a very positive response. 

Reputation  1 4 4

A ‐ Implement and maintain a  stakeholder management plan.

B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer to 

ensure high level engagement with customers as early as possible. This will 

allow our stakeholders to understand exactly what we are aiming to achieve 

and what the benefits are. 

A ‐ SW & SG

B ‐ SW & AM & 

SG

Ongoing N/A 1 4 4

6

Technical Issues with Robotic Platform for Elements 1,2&3                   

Any technical issues when developing the robotic platform could 

delay the Project and lead to increased costs. Further issues may 

arise if the project timeline begins to slip.

Time / 

Financial4 4 16

A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support 

the project.

B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.     

A ‐ ULC                     

B ‐ SW & RPS 10/04/2015 54 1 4 4

By When

Residual Risk

Project Plan Ref 

Business Risk

Ref No

Risk

Inherent Risk

Controls & Mitigation Owner

Responsibility Key:AM ‐ Angus McIntosh (SGN)SW ‐ Sam Wilson (SGN)SG ‐ Susan Gray (SGN)DP ‐ Dave Phelan (RPS)MP ‐Mike Passaretti (ULC)

Page 64: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

7

Technical Issues with Robotic Platform for Element 4                             

Any technical issues when developing the robotic platform could 

delay the Project and lead to increased costs. Further issues may 

arise if the project timeline begins to slip

Time / 

Financial4 4 16

A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support 

the project.

B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.     

A ‐ ULC                     

B ‐ SW & RPS 09/01/2017 253 1 4 4

8

Repair Module (Element 2)

Issues that may occur when developing the Repair Module has the 

potential to delay the project.

Time / 

Financial4 4 16

A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support 

the project.

B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project. 

A‐ ULC   

B ‐ SW & RPS          10/04/2015 48 1 4 4

9

Sensor Module (Element 3)

Issues that may occur when developing the Sensor Module has the 

potential to delay the project.

Selection of optimum Sensor.

Sensor Accuracy, Processing Time, Interface & Usefulness.

Sensor Module proposed puts pipe safety at risk

Time / 

Financial4 4 16

A ‐ ULC Robotics to investigate optimum solution to satisfy the needs of the 

project. 

B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project. 

A‐ ULC 

B ‐ SW & RPS          23/10/2015 160 2 4 8

10

Repairing Leaking Joints                                                                                 

There is a risk that a solution for remotely repairing leaking Weco 

seals and mechanical joints will not be determined.

Financial  1 5 5

A ‐ Develop sealing methods and conceptual designs early in the project 

schedule to ensure that a method is determined.

B ‐ Shop testing will be performed to ensure that the methodology provides 

an adequate seal.                                    

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has 

not been determined.

A ‐ ULC                     

B ‐ ULC                     

C ‐ SW & RPS03/07/2015 79 1 5 5

11

Sensor Manufacturer Not Found                                                                  

There is a risk that a sensor manufacturer will not be found which 

meets the requirements i.e. functioning and transmitting data 

accurately over a long distance, providing accurate measurement of 

pipe wall loss, measurements in varying pipe diameters etc.  

Time / 

Financial2 5 10

A ‐ Generate a report outlining options for sensors and the pros/cons of each 

will be performed early in the project.

B ‐ A collaborative decision relative to the sensor selected for the project will 

be performed. 

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a manufacturer 

is not found.             

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW & ULC          

C ‐ SW & RPS

06/03/2015 142 1 5 5

12

Sensor Manufacturer                                                                                       

Delays from the sensor manufacturer could affect the overall 

schedule. 

Time / 

Financial3 4 12

A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support 

the project.                                                                           B ‐ Review project plan 

if required for sourcing sensor vendor

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW                      06/03/2015 142 2 4 8

13

Technical Issues with Service Replacement                                                

Any unforeseen technical issues with service replacement could 

hamper the effectiveness of the robotic system and delay the 

Project. For example; identifying custom flexible PE tubing to insert 

in the service line, identifying custom fittings for service replacement 

and ensuring a reliable and gas tight seal on the newly connected 

service. 

Time / 

Financial4 4 16

A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support 

the project.

B ‐ Test robot in mock up main.                                                                                     

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates at early stages of the project.     

A ‐ SW                      

B ‐ SW                      

C ‐ SW & RPS14/04/2017 247 1 4 4

14

Field Trial Challenges                                                                                       

The mains selected for the field trial are not suitable for the robotic 

operation. 

Time / 

Financial 3 3 9

A ‐ Network Analysis undertaken.                                                                                 

B ‐ Familiarity with site location and mains. 

C ‐ Pre inspection of main using camera.

A ‐ SGN

B ‐ SGN & ULC        

C ‐ SW & RPS

23/06/2017 267 1 3 3

15Launch Robot for Elements 1,2&3                                                                

SGN / ULC Robotics are unable to launch the robot into the main.  

Time / 

Financial1 5 5

A ‐ Ensure entry tee compatible with launch tube and manufacturer 

requirements.                                                                                                                    

B ‐ Design parameters well defined.                                                                             

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.                                         

A‐ ULC 

B ‐ ULC 

C ‐ SW & RPS          

18/01/2016 80 1 5 5

16Launch Robot for Element 4                                                                          

SGN / ULC Robotics are unable to launch the robot into the main.  

Time / 

Financial1 5 5

A ‐ Ensure entry tee compatible with launch tube and manufacturer 

requirements.                                                                                                               B 

‐ Design parameters well defined.                                                                                 

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.                                         

A‐ ULC 

B ‐ ULC 

C ‐ SW & RPS          

27/11/2017 253 1 5 5

Page 65: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

17

Robot Manoeuvrability E1,2&3                                                                     

There is a risk that a motor drive system capable of transporting the 

robotic system for each element cannot be developed. 

Financial  2 4 8

A ‐ ULC have significant experience developing and deploying complex 

electromechanical systems in live natural gas mains and other inaccessible 

locations. 

B ‐ Ability to apply past engineering knowledge along with computer 

modelling and simulation to guide the conceptual design of the robotic 

platform drive system. 

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has 

not been determined.                                                                                

A‐ ULC 

B ‐ ULC  

C ‐ SW & RPS          

06/02/2015 74 1 4 4

18

Robot Manoeuvrability E4                                                                             

There is a risk that a motor drive system capable of transporting the 

robotic system for each element cannot be developed. 

Financial  2 4 8

A ‐ ULC have significant experience developing and deploying complex 

electromechanical systems in live natural gas mains and other inaccessible 

locations. 

B ‐ Ability to apply past engineering knowledge along with computer 

modelling and simulation to guide the conceptual design of the robotic 

platform drive system. 

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has 

not been determined.                                                                                

A‐ ULC 

B ‐ ULC  

C ‐ SW & RPS          

09/09/2016 241 1 4 4

19

Structural Assessment 

Risk associated with the Launch Tube and the structural integrity of 

the pipe condition to take loads. 

Time / 

Financial1 4 4

A ‐ RPS to carry out assessment with review from Structural Engineers. 

Structural Assessment takes into account maximum loads in ideal scenarios 

and then provides assumptions that affect maximum loads (for example wall 

thickness & unsupported pipe lengths).

B ‐ ULC to agree and be satisfied with assumptions. 

A‐ RPS

B ‐ ULC   09/01/2015 N/A 1 4 4

20

Robotic Functionality For E1,2&3                                                                 

There is a risk that the technology developed cannot be operated at 

the target length of 150 meters or manoeuvre around debris, 

obstacle and bends.

Financial  2 4 8

A ‐ Utilise 3D modelling and simulation techniques throughout the design to 

determine the estimated travel distance and ability to manoeuvre within the 

pipe (launch, retrieve, avoid or travel over/through debris and obstacles, 

etc.).  

B ‐ Once the manoeuvrability and the overall travel distance for each pipe size 

has been determined a decision can be made to pursue one concept, modify 

the design to meet the specifications of the project or modify the project 

criteria to meet the design limitations.

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has 

not been determined.                                                                                

A‐ SW / ULC            

B ‐ SW & ULC

C ‐ SW & RPS

25/09/2015 74 1 4 4

21

Robotic Functionality for E4                                                                           

There is a risk that the technology developed cannot be operated at 

the target length of 150 meters or manoeuvre around debris, 

obstacle and bends.

Financial  2 4 8

A ‐ Utilise 3D modelling and simulation techniques throughout the design to 

determine the estimated travel distance and ability to manoeuvre within the 

pipe (launch, retrieve, avoid or travel over/through debris and obstacles, 

etc.).  

B ‐ Once the manoeuvrability and the overall travel distance for each pipe size 

has been determined a decision can be made to pursue one concept, modify 

the design to meet the specifications of the project or modify the project 

criteria to meet the design limitations.

C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has 

not been determined.                                                                                

A‐ SW / ULC            

B ‐ SW & ULC

C ‐ SW & RPS

17/02/2017 245 1 4 4

22

Capabilities of the Tether for Elements 1 & 2                                            

There is a risk that a tether capable of carrying power and data 

connections meeting the distance and bend radius requirements 

cannot be developed. For example; transmitting data over a long 

distance, providing sufficient bend radius, manufacture lightweight 

and robust tether to the desired length.                                                      

As a result of the design process, it has been determined that the 

best course of action is to develop two tethers (one for the sensor 

module and one for the repair module). 

Financial  2 5 10

A ‐ Deliver a list of conceptual design requirements to cable manufacturers 

for quotations early in  the project to mitigate against technical and schedule 

risk. 

B ‐ Experience working with several industrial cable manufacturers to develop 

custom, highly specialised tethers for powering and controlling robotic 

systems. 

C ‐ Conceptual Design Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the project plan at 

an early stage in case a solution cannot be determined.                                          

D ‐ ULC are aware of the issue of gas leakage at the gland arrangement of the 

large CISBOT launch tube.. This will be factored into conceptual design               

E ‐ Developing two tethers will avoid complications with dual functionality 

and will be proven through the controlled testing phase of the project               

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW 

C ‐ SW & RPS          

D ‐ ULC                     

E ‐ ULC

22/05/2015 71 1 5 5

Page 66: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

23

Capabilities of the Tether for Elements 1 & 3                                            

There is a risk that a tether capable of carrying power and data 

connections meeting the distance and bend radius requirements 

cannot be developed. For example; transmitting data over a long 

distance, providing sufficient bend radius, manufacture lightweight 

and robust tether to the desired length.                                                      

As a result of the design process, it has been determined that the 

best course of action is to develop two tethers (one for the sensor 

module and one for the repair module). 

Financial  2 5 10

A ‐ Deliver a list of conceptual design requirements to cable manufacturers 

for quotations early in  the project to mitigate against technical and schedule 

risk. 

B ‐ Experience working with several industrial cable manufacturers to develop 

custom, highly specialised tethers for powering and controlling robotic 

systems. 

C ‐ Conceptual Design Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the project plan at 

an early stage in case a solution cannot be determined.                                          

D ‐ ULC are aware of the issue of gas leakage at the gland arrangement of the 

large CISBOT launch tube. This will be factored into conceptual design                

E ‐ Developing two tethers will avoid complications with dual functionality 

and will be proven through the controlled testing phase of the project               

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW 

C ‐ SW & RPS          

D ‐ ULC                     

E ‐ ULC

22/05/2015 71 1 5 5

24

Capabilities of the Tether for Element 4                                                     

There is a risk that a tether capable of carrying power and data 

connections meeting the distance and bend radius requirements 

cannot be developed. For example; transmitting data over a long 

distance, providing sufficient bend radius, manufacture lightweight 

and robust tether to the desired length. 

Financial  2 5 10

A ‐ Deliver a list of conceptual design requirements to cable manufacturers 

for quotations early in the project to mitigate against technical and schedule 

risk. 

B ‐ Experience working with several industrial cable manufacturers to develop 

custom, highly specialised tethers for powering and controlling robotic 

systems. 

C ‐ Conceptual Design Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the project plan at 

an early stage in case a solution cannot be determined.                                          

D ‐ ULC are aware of the issue of gas leakage at the gland. This will be 

factored into conceptual design                                                                                    

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW 

C ‐ SW & RPS          

D ‐ ULC

17/02/2017 243 1 5 5

25

Tapping and Fitting Tools                                                                               

There is a risk that a tapping and fitting tools capable of being carried 

and operated by the service replacement robot cannot be 

developed. 

Financial  2 5 10

A ‐ Tools for service replacement will be identified early in the development 

stage of the robotic system. 

B ‐ Experience developing a prototype service replacement robot which 

performed tapping and fitting of a new service connection on inserted PE 

pipe.                                                                                                             C ‐ The 

entire system will be shop tested at ULC to ensure it performs prior to being 

deployed in the field.

D ‐ Tapping and Fitting Tool Validation Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the 

project plan in case a solution cannot be determined.                                             

A‐ ULC 

B ‐ ULC  

C ‐ SW & ULC          

D ‐ SW & RPS          

12/05/2017 250 1 5 5

26

Cost Escalation

Costs may escalate due to unforeseen circumstances and / or 

unknown delays in Programme, procurement, shipping, field trials 

etc. 

Financial  2 5 10

A ‐ Build sufficient float into Project plan

B ‐ Project has built in Go/No Go Stage Gates to ensure an opportunity to halt 

Project at anytime.

A‐ SW / ULC 

B ‐ SW & RPSOngoing N/A 1 5 5

27

SME Cash flow 

There is a risk that ULC may not have the required cash flow to 

complete each task defined on the project plan. 

Financial  2 5 10

A ‐ Up front mobilisation payment.

B ‐ Project has built in payment milestones to ensure steady cash flow.              

C ‐ Go/No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan at critical points. 

A ‐ SW

B ‐ SW & ULC          

C ‐ SW Ongoing N/A 1 5 5

28

Timetable Slippage

Timetable may slip due to unforeseen circumstances and / or 

unknown delays in procurement, custom and shipping to the UK.  

Time / 

Financial2 4 8

A ‐ Build sufficient float into Project plan

B ‐ Regular steering group reviews to monitor progress against the 

programme

C ‐ If required there is an opportunity to halt programme at Go/No Go Stage 

Gates

A ‐ SW & AM

B ‐ SW & AM

C ‐ AM

Ongoing N/A 2 4 8

29

Operation of Robot in a Live Gas Main For Elements 1,2&3

Safety risk ‐ pollution risk from gas leakage and potential for 

anaerobic sealant to contaminate moving parts of the robot as well 

as debris from inside the main to be spread when removing the 

robot. Due to operation in the carriageway, potential risk of impact 

from vehicles in the event of a road traffic accident.

Time / 

Financial2 4 8

A ‐ Spillage kits available at trial sites                                                                           

B ‐ Monitor level of debris being removed from main visually using robot 

camera                                                                                                                                

C ‐ ULC to consider the impact of anaerobic contamination on 

moving/functional parts of the robot and the associated cleaning that is 

required.                                                                                                                            

D ‐ The operation of E2 & E3 will be performed using two seperate 

transportation platforms, reducing design complexity and the possibility of 

anerobic contamination to one system.

A ‐ SW & RPS          

B ‐ ULC                     

C ‐ ULC                     

D ‐ ULC / SGN

25/09/2015 72 2 4 8

Page 67: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

30

Operation of Robot in a Live Gas Main For Element 4

Safety risk ‐ pollution risk from gas leakage and potential for debris 

from inside the main to be spread when removing the robot

Time / 

Financial2 4 8

A ‐ Spillage kits available at trial sites                                                                           

B ‐ Monitor level of debris being removed from main visually using robot 

camera      

A ‐ SW & RPS          

B ‐ ULC09/01/2017 253 1 4 4

31

Structural Integrity of Pipe Wall

The impact of the pressure applied by the robotic wheels when 

operating inside the main could have a detrimental affect on the 

integrity of the pipe wall. 

Reputation / 

Time / 

Financial

1 4 4

A ‐ A Structural Assessment will be carried out to mitigate this risk                      

B ‐ Launch tube operational weight design parameters set for ULC                       

C ‐ Coupon sample taken from main at initial survey to confirm main material 

prior to the launch tube being fitted

A ‐ RPS                     

B ‐ SW & RPS        

C ‐ SW & ULC

10/04/2015 52 1 4 4

32

Launch tube development for Elements 1, 2 & 3.  A launch tube 

design needs to be developed to facilitate a gas free operation and 

ease of use on site. Considerations need to be given to its 

manoeuvrability, functionality and the excavation footprint. 

Time / 

financial1 4 4

A ‐ ULC and SGN to utilise experience gained from Large CISBOT trial and 

incorporate improvements into the new design                                                        

B ‐ SGN and RPS to assess designs against UK legislation                                         

C ‐ Maximum operating weight of launch tube to be identified as a result of 

structural integrity pipe wall report conducted by RPS (30)

A ‐ ULC & SGN      

B ‐ SGN & RPS         

C ‐ SGN & RPS

16/01/2015 59 1 4 4

33

Communication of Project Team                              Due to 

geographical split of team across UK, Ireland and the USA, there is a 

risk that effective communication channels may not be maintained 

efficiently. 

Time / 

Financial1 4 4

A ‐ Face‐to‐face meetings for key stage gate deliverables                                        

B ‐ Use of virtual meeting centre and secure file share

A ‐ SW                      

B ‐ SWOngoing N/A 1 4 4

34Impact of UK legislation/HSE acknowledgement of remediation 

technique.  

Time / 

Financial3 4 12

A ‐ SGN to set up regular progress meetings with HSE                                              

B ‐ RPS and SGN to check legislative requirements for system operation and 

outputs

A ‐ SW & AM           

B ‐ RPSOngoing N/A 2 4 8

Page 68: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

  

 68

 

 

 

Project 

ppendi

Progress Rep

x D ‐ Let

port Two 

tter to NNGT 

 19thh December 22014 

Page 69: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

National National Warwic Gallows WarwicCV34 616 Dece Dear Sir/ Re: Net Thank yo Having shand the technolorobotics approac ourselve It appearNTS and capable challengconducti We do nfollowin

1)

2)

3) We belieconditiopressuresome leacoming m

Grid TransmiGrid House Technology PHill

DA mber 2014 

Madam, 

work Innovatio

u for the opp

uccessfully impotential finangy. As you arproject, and ha taken by Nat

s worked with

s that this projall distributio

of inspecting ces. If successfung proactive a

ot think that thg reasons:

Designed for

Designed for

Targeting ins

ve that there mn measuremen involved, therning from the

months and wi

ission

Park

on Competitio

ortunity to c

mplemented rncial, operatire aware, we ave undertakional Grid Tr

h Synthotech o

ject will need on networks bocomplex pipewful however, iand efficient a

his project co

r Unpiggabl

r significantl

spection of 

may be an opnt methods. Ae sensors we ae sensor reviewill share the r

on 

omment on yo

obotics into loonal and envirhave been recn this in partnansmission in on a robotics a

to develop rooth in the Uwork, operati will potenti lsset managem

nflicts with th

e pipeline co

y higher pre

asset conditio

portunity to shthough the pi

are developingw we have clevant outcom

our NIC proje

ow pressure gronmental beently awardenership with

n their partnersand other inn

obotic technol. The develo

ng at up to 10lly allow the

ment.

e above ment

nfiguration

ssures (100b

on only not 

hare some leapeline operat

g as part of ompleted. We

mes.

     

ct 2014. 

as distributionefits associate (2013) NIC f

ULC Roboticsship with Synovation & tech

ogy which is, pment of a ro0barG will fanetwork to op

ioned NIC a

barg) 

remediation

rning betweeing environmr NIC project will be subm

     SGN      St. La     Statio     Horley     Surre     RH6 9 

pipework, weed with this tyfunding for ou, so can see sithotech and Pr

hnology projec

at present, ubotic inline ince a number oerate at full c

arded to our

 or replacem

both projectent will be vermay be appli

itting our SDR

wrence Housn Approach y y 9HJ 

e have seen aype of in-pipeur own innovimilarities in remtech. We cts under NI

navailable acrnspection deviof unique and apacity whilst

network for th

ment  

s in relations ry different dicable, or therRC 3 report i

t first

ative the have

A.

oss the ce complex t

he

to asset ue to the e may be

n the

Page 70: NIC Robotics Progress Report Two · NIC Robotics Project Progress Report Two 19th December 2014 Sam Wilson NIC Robotics Project Manager

We woulthe same Similar tconduct demonst Yours Si Angus InnovatiSGN  

d also be happfor ours.

o the NTS, ounspection to v

rable data.

ncerely

McIntosh on & New Tec

py to support

ur transmissiovalidate asset

chnology Ma

technical peer

n network is health is criti

nager

r review at th

nearing the encal to maximi

e end of the p

d of its desigsing asset life

roject, and w

n life and as s and extendin

ould invite yo

uch the requirng this asset li

u to do

rement to fe by