ngt final premidtrm1

8/8/2019 NGT Final Premidtrm1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ngt-final-premidtrm1 1/13

PRESENTATION ON

PRESENTED BY

SIDDHARTH MISHRA

ROL.NO.: 10DM010

PROGRAM: PGDM-A



CONTENTS

INTRODUCTIONGROUP DECISION-ADVT./DISADVT.

VARIOUS GROUP DECISION TECH.NOMINAL GROUP DECISION TECH.ADVANTAGE & DISADVANTAGE

CONCLUSIONREFERENCE



INTRODU CTION

This technique was originallydeveloped by Delbecq,Van de Venand Gustafson in 1971, and hasbeen applied to adult educationprogram planning by Vedros .A nominal group technique is astructured process originallydeveloped as an organizationalplanning technique



Group decisi on s:adva ntages a nd disadva ntages

+ Pooling of resourcesmore information andknowledgegenerates more

alternatives+ Several stakeholders

involvedincreases acceptanceincreases legitimacy

- Time consuming

- Ambiguous responsibility- Problems with group workMinority dominationUnequal participation



DIFFERENT GROUP DE CISION MAKIN G

Dive r si ty-b asedInf igh ting

Risk y Shi ft

Devil¶s Adv ocac y

Dialec ticalInqu iryDel phi

Tech niqu e

Nom inal Group Tech niqu e

Br ains torm ing

Groupt hink

Common Inform a tion Bias

GroupDecisionMaking

Adapted from Exhibit 10-3: Group Decision-Making Phenomena²Pitfalls and Techniques



Nom inal g roup tech niqu e (1/4)

Organised group meetings for problemidentification, problem solving, programplanning

Used to eliminate the problemsencountered in small group meetings

Balances interests

Increases participation2-3 hours sessions

6-12 members

Larger groups divided in subgroups



Nom inal g roup tech niqu e (2/4)

Step 1: Silent generation of ideasThe leader presents questions to the groupIndividual responses in written format (5 min)

Group work not allowed

Step 2: Recorded round-robin listing of ideasEach member presents an idea in turnAll ideas are listed on a flip chart

Step 3: Brief discussion of ideas on the chartClarifies the ideas common understanding of theproblemMax 40 min



Nom inal g roup tech niqu e (3/4)Step 4: Preliminary vote on priorities

Each member ranks 5 to 7 most important ideas from theflip chart and records them on separate cardsThe leader counts the votes on the cards and writes themon the chart

Step 5: Break

Step 6: Discussion of the vote

Examination of inconsistent voting patterns

Step 7: Final voteMore sophisticated voting procedures may be used here

Step 8: Listing and agreement on the prioritiseditems



ADVANTA GE-DISADVANTA GE

Best for small group meetings:Fact findingIdea generationSearch of problem or solution

Not suitable for :Routine businessBargainingProblems with predetermined outcomesSettings where consensus is required



CON CLUSION

Modification of NGT, undertaken by Bartunekand Murnighan , helps to deal with ill-structuredproblems.Normal ideas are generated and listed, followedby the facilitator questioning if the ideas arerelevant to the same problem. If not, the problemis said to be ill-structured, and the ideasgenerated are clustered into coherent groups.These clusters of ill-structured ideas are thentreated as problems in their own right, and the

NGT procedure is applied to them.Regular breaks are taken by the participants toensure that the group feels they are still workingon the original problem



REFEREN CE

Helsinki University of TechnologySystems Analysis Laboratory

( http://www.eLearning.sal.hut.fi )http://www.wikipedia.com

ngt final premidtrm1

Documents