new ldf cover amr - calderdale.gov.uk · the proportion of housing completions on brownfield sites...

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� ! " # � ! $

Introduction

21 Executive Summary

42 Delivery of Documents within the Local Development Scheme

4Introduction

6Statement of Community Involvement

6Sustainability Appraisal

7Appropriate Assessment

7Pressures for Additional Development Plan Documents

83 Saved Plan

8Introduction

8Saved Plan - Replacement Calderdale UDP 2006

224 Neighbourhood Planning

245 Community Infrastructure Levy

256 Co-operation and joint working

297 Monitoring Indicators

29Core Output Indicators

35Housing

35Completions

36Supply

37Future Development

ContentsC

alderdale MB

C | A

nnual Monitoring R

eport 2013 - 2014

1.1 This Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) is prepared by Calderdale Council under the requirements of thePlanning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. It covers the monitoring year 1st April 2013 to the 31st March2014, providing information on the implementation of the Local Development Scheme (LDS) and the extentto which the aims and objectives of policies within the Replacement Calderdale Unitary Development Plan(Adopted August 2006 and amended by the Secretary of State in August 2009) were met during thisperiod.

1.2 The Localism Act 2011 relaxed the requirements placed on Local Authorities in relation to production ofthe AMR.The most significant changes include the removal of the mandatory reporting on the Core OutputIndicators, and the mandatory submission deadline of 31st December each year.The Localism Act requiresthat each authority still prepares a report no less than annually, however it is up to them when and howthis is done.

1.3 The Localism Act 2011, along with the National Planning Policy Framework and new Regulations governingplan preparation have changed the way in which the planning system operates. This AMR continues toreport against the Core Output Indicators reported in previous AMRs, together with brief updates on thenew aspects of reporting around Neighbourhood Planning, Community Infrastructure Levy and Co-operationand Joint Working.

Core Indicators

1.4 This AMR represents the 7th annual report to collect and publish information against the revised set ofnational Core Output Indicators published by the government in 2008 (Regional Spatial Strategy & LocalDevelopment Framework - Core Output Indicators - Update 2/2008 (Communities and Local Government,July 2008)). Although it is no longer a mandatory requirement to report against the core indicators, theCouncil are still intending to do so (apart from H6 - Housing Quality: Building for Life Assessments) tomaintain a useful time series of data and measure of performance.

1.5 The main findings from the set of revised Core Indicators are:-

Housing completions (gross) in 2013/14 were low at 373 units compared to the previous two years'completions of 510 in 2012/13 and 513 in 2011/12. New housing completions remain at their lowestlevels in Calderdale for around 20 years. Net completions were 339 dwellings in the same period.Despite completion rates remaining well below those seen during the peak in 2006/07, the past fewyears completions were broadly in line with the average completion target of 450 per annum set outin the RCUDP, however they have fallen below the target this year and they are still significantlybelow the average RSS annual requirement of 670;

The overall housing requirement in the RCUDP to 2016 has already been well exceeded during theperiod 2001-2013 (see Figure 7.1 'Housing Trajectory 2001 to 2016 based on RCUDP'). The overallrequirement in RSS to 2028 is now anticipated to be met by around 2023/24 (see Figure 7.2 'HousingTrajectory 2004 to 2008 based on RSS (2008)');

The proportion of housing completions on brownfield sites at 76.4% of new housing completionswas below the RCUDP target of 80% but above the RSS 2008 target of 65%. In 2013/14 . As inprevious years, land continues to be lost from employment to residential use;

There were 126 affordable homes built in 2013/14, down from 195 in 2012/13, but higher than2011/12 (100 dwellings). This represents almost 34% of the total gross housing completions for theyear compared with 40% in 2012/13 and 20% in 2011/12;

Employment land development in 2013/14, achieved 1,566sq.m of new gross B1 (Business),5,056sq.m of new gross B2 (General Industry), and 1000sq.m of new gross B8 (Storage/Distribution)additional floorspace.This total gross gain of 7,622sq.m of employment floorspace was significantlylower than the previous figure of 15,126sq.m in 2012/13. When losses through change of use and

1 . Executive Summary

2

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

demolitions are taken into account, the net figures show -99sq.m of B1, -5,295sq.m of new net B2(i.e. a net loss), and 365sq.m of new net B8 floorspace. Overall therefore, once losses are takeninto account there was a net loss of 5,029sq.m employment floorspace over the monitoring period.

Of the total gross new employment floorspace developed in 2013/14, 100% was on previouslydeveloped land.

In total there is 98.97ha of land in Calderdale where planning permission for employment use isoutstanding, an increase of around 34ha from the previous monitoring period.The largest component(44.38ha) is for B2 use, and the majority of the remaining land (25.75ha) is for B1 use;

(NOTE : due to monitoring difficulties, the 2013/14 employment figures do not take into accountall planning applications which have been commenced or completed and does not monitor allchange of uses. Therefore comparison is difficult with previous years. The employmentmonitoring procedure is under review and future AMRs will be revised to ensure consistencyof outputs).

Within town centre uses, there was a net gain of 13,181sq.m of new floorspace across Calderdale.Primarily this was new A1 retail floorspace (9,348sq.m net) and D2 Assembly and Leisure floorspace(2,534sq.m net).

The majority of new provision of A1 and D2 floorspace was located outside the designated towncentres;

An additional 4 hectares of land has been designated as biodiversity importance across the district.This is the the second year running the AMR reports an increase in the areas of biodiversity importancein the district;

A further 1.054MW of renewable energy generation capacity has been permitted, and 26MW ofrenewable energy completed installed capacity;

Waste sent to landfill increased from around 841 tonnes in 2012/13 to 3,390 tonnes in 2013/14.Thisis still dramatically lower than 38,000 tonnes in 2011/12 a result of the vast majority of previouslandfill waste going to treatment sites as opposed to landfill. Total waste arisings was 83,843 in themonitoring period.

1.6 Full details of all the core indicators, together with locally specific contextual indicators, are provided in 7'Monitoring Indicators'.

1 . Executive Summary

3

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M

onitoring Report 2013 - 2014

Introduction

Key Aspects of the LOCAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME (LDS) during 2013/14

2.1 The latest LDS was formally ratified by the Council on 25 April 2012 and came into effect on 26 April 2012.However, subsequent changes to the planning system, implemented through the Localism Act 2011 andthe National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), mean this is now out of date and a revised LDS will bepresented to Council in early 2015.

2.2 In summary, the progress on documents to date is:-

Statement of Community Involvement: - this was formally Adopted by the Council in February2008; A revision of the SCI will be required as the Local Plan progresses;

Core Strategy: - work commenced on the Core Strategy in January 2008. An 'Issues and Options'Consultation was undertaken during November/January 2008/09 with a 'Refined Issues and Options'consultation between January and May 2011. Further significant evidence base work was undertakenduring the intervening periods.The 'Preferred Options' consultation took place during autumn/winter2012.

NOTE : the Council has decided to work on a Combined Local Plan - which will deal with thestrategic elements of the Core Strategy together with the site specific allocations anddesignations that were to have been undertaken through the Land Allocations and DesignationsDPD. As a result the Core Strategy will no longer be progressed.

Land Allocations & Designations DPD (LADPlan): - work on this commenced in January 2008at the same time as the Core Strategy when a "Call for Sites" was issued. Submissions are still beingsought and accepted. Early engagement and awareness raising within communities across thedistrict was undertaken during the first quarter of 2014.

NOTE : the Council is no longer preparing a separate LADPlan and will bring forward landallocations in the new combined Local Plan.

LOCAL PLAN : the Council is to produce a Combined Local Plan as a single DPD and a revisedLDS will set out the time line in early 2015.

2.3 In addition, the Council has undertaken work in the process of preparing two Supplementary PlanningDocuments (SPDs), the Halifax Town Centre and Piece Hall SPD and Holmes Road, Sowerby BridgeSPD, including a consultation process in Summer 2010 on the Halifax Town Centre and Piece Hall SPD.Work on both of these documents has now been halted. No further SPDs are currently proposed.

2 . Delivery of Documents within the Local Development Scheme

4

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

2.4 The latest proposals for the LDS are as follows:-

Table 2.1 Local Development Scheme 2015

DatesPurpose of StagePhase of Plan-Making

Autumn2012

This focused on the options that have been discussed throughearlier consultations on the Core Strategy and declares which

Preferred Options forCore Strategy

approach the Council prefers. It gave reasoning for why optionswere excluded and made it clear why the Council was supportingcertain preferred options for both the spatial elements and strategicpolicies.

Feb/Mar2014

Presented in a more formal manner the land proposed bydevelopers in the SHLAA and ELR; and allowed communities to

Early engagement onthe Land Allocations

make comments on the appropriateness of these sites andencouraged communities to put forward additional proposals.

Jan/Feb2015

This consultation will introduce the methodologies that the Councilwill use to determine the Land Allocations and Green Belt Review

Consultation on methodologies for SiteAssessment and GreenBelt Review

Oct/Nov2015

Bringing together the strategic and land allocation elements, thiswill state the scale of development that is likely to be proposed andbring forward options for the use of sites.

DRAFT PLAN –including Options forSites

This will set out the preferences for the Council’s approach to thescale of development and the likely land that it would prefer to beincluded as part of the draft plan. It will include a proposed Policiesmap and details of the Land Allocations that the Council wouldprefer to consider as part of the plan making process.

July 2016This is the version of the Plan that the Council wishes to put forwardfor Examination. All the evidence will be in place at the time of

APPROVAL OFPUBLICATION OF THELOCAL PLAN publication. It is the version that the Council considers to be “sound”

in terms of the legal requirements placed on plan preparation andto be justified and deliverable.

Following the Council’s approval of the Publication version of theplan the policies and proposals plan will have significant weight inthe decision-taking process.

Oct/Nov2016

This will be the formal consultation on the draft plan, and will givecommunities, stake-holders and other interested persons the finalopportunity to make comments on the plan.

PUBLICATION PLANCONSULTATION

Formal objections regarding the “soundness” of the Core Strategywill need to be submitted at this stage.

Early 2017This is an administrative stage and relates to the formal submissionof the documents (including all formal representations received

SUBMISSION


5

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


DatesPurpose of StagePhase of Plan-Making

during the Publication Deposit period) to the Secretary of State forindependent examination by a Planning Inspector.

At this stage the Council can request that the Inspector makesrecommendations which would address the issues identified duringthe Examination in order to ensure that the plan is “sound”.

During 2017The formal examination of the Local Plan will start when the planis submitted. Hearings will be held into specific aspects of the plan

INDEPENDENTEXAMINATION

during the examination, and “objectors” will have the right to beinvolved in that process.

End 2017The Council will receive the inspector’s Report and consider therecommendations, before it formally “adopts” the Local Plan,

ADOPTION

What is happening outside the LDS?

REPLACEMENT CALDERDALE UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2006)

2.5 The Replacement Calderdale Unitary Development Plan (RCUDP) came into effect on 25 August 2006.The Council received a Direction from the Secretary of State "saving" policies within the RCUDP for anindefinite period in August 2009. A full schedule detailing the "saved" policies is provided in Chapter 3Saved Plan. It remains the relevant Development Plan to be taken into account in determining planningapplications.

REGIONAL SPATIAL STRATEGY (2008)

2.6 The Coalition Government revoked the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) in February 2013. As a result theformer RSS is no longer part of the Development Plan for Calderdale. However much of the evidence andpolicy direction is still relevant and is being considered as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan,although this is now becoming dated and is being replaced by more up-to-date evidence as the Local Planis developed.

Statement of Community Involvement

2.7 The Adopted SCI (2008) is guiding public engagement within the Local Plan preparation process. However,the significant changes to the planning system introduced by the Localism Act 2011, together withamendments to Regulations governing plan preparation means that the SCI is out of date.

2.8 A review of the SCI is needed to reflect the latest Regulations and the manner in which the council ispreparing the Local Plan. Such review is likely during 2015.

Sustainability Appraisal

2.9 The Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Framework, required to enable the appraisal of the environmental impactsand compliance with regulations relating to Strategic Environmental Assessment of development plandocuments and supplementary planning documents, was first published in 2007 after consultation withthe statutory Consultation Bodies (Natural England; the Environment Agency and English Heritage). Thisframework was used initially to appraise the Supplementary Planning Documents prepared by the Councilrelating to Affordable Housing, Open Space, and Developer Contributions Towards Education.


6

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

2.10 To ensure the Local Plan is informed by an up to date SA, the Council consulted on a review of the original2007 SA Framework during consultation alongside the Core Strategy Issues and Options in winter2008/2009.

2.11 The SA was further revised to support the publication of the Preferred Options of the Core Strategy andreleased for public comment in Autumn 2012. Further appraisal work will be undertaken as the plan isdeveloped to ensure compliance with the Regulations. Consultation on the revised Sustainability Appraisalwill be undertaken during early 2015 and a final version of the SA will be developed to support thepublication of the Local Plan.

Appropriate Assessment

2.12 Work required under the Habitats Regulations and Directive to assess the implications of policies andproposals on the Special Protection Area (SPA) and Special Area of Conservation (SAC) which inCalderdale are coterminous is also being undertaken as part of the plan preparation. This work will beundertaken alongside plan preparation and the development of the Sustainability Appraisal.

Pressures for Additional Development Plan Documents

2.13 There are currently no pressures for additional Development Plan Documents to be created. Howeverthis situation may change as the Core Strategy and Land Allocations & Designations DPD's are developed.


7

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


Introduction

3.1 The saved plan for Calderdale is the adopted Replacement Calderdale UDP (2006). This was "saved"under the provisions of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. In early August 2009, a Directionwas issued by the Secretary of State indicating which policies the Council was able to carry forward foran indefinite period until replaced by policies in the new Local Plan or specifically deleted by the Council.The effect of the Secretary of State's Direction is to delete a number of policies from the plan. These areindicated by being excluded from the table in 'Saved Plan - Replacement Calderdale UDP 2006'.

3.2 On the 22nd February 2013 the Coalition Government partially revoked the Regional Spatial Strategy(RSS) for Yorkshire & Humber. Following the issuing of the partial revocation (Statutory Instrument 2013No. 117) the only policies remaining from RSS relate to the York Green Belt. In Calderdale therefore,there is no statutory regional policy framework and the development plan comprises the ReplacementCalderdale UDP only.

3.3 In addition to the partial revocation of RSS, the Coalition Government has introduced the National PlanningPolicy Framework (NPPF) which came into effect on the 23rd March 2012. Annex 1 of the NPPF sets outhow the NPPF should be used in decision making, within the context of Local Plans. Paragraph 215 statesthat "due weight should be given to relevant policies in existing plans according to their degree ofconsistency with this framework (the closer the policies in the plan to the policies in the Framework thegreater the weight that may be given)".

3.4 In order to assist decision making an exercise to assess compliance of the remaining RCUDP policieswith the NPPF has been undertaken. The assessment, used in Development Management decisions, isset out in the final column of the Table 3.1 'SAVED POLICIES - Replacement Calderdale UnitaryDevelopment Plan (August 2006) as Revised by Direction of the Secretary of State, August 2009' thatfollows.

3.5 In addition the NPPF has changed the weight to be attached to draft policies within the Local Plan as theypass through the plan making process as indicated by paragraph 216 - "From the day of publication,decision-takers may also give weight to relevant policies in emerging plans according to:

The stage of preparation of the emerging plan (the more advanced the preparation, the greater theweight that may be given);The extent to which there are unresolved objections to relevant policies (the less significant theunresolved objections, the greater weight that may be given); andThe degree of consistency of the relevant policies in the emerging plan to the policies in this framework(the closer the policies in the emerging plan to the policies in the Framework, the greater the weightthat may be given)";

3.6 As the emerging Local Plan progresses to Publication stage (anticipated in Oct/Nov 2016), furtherinformation regarding the specific weight is to be given to these new policies will be provided in the AMR.

Saved Plan - Replacement Calderdale UDP 2006

3.7 The following table sets out the status of Policies within the currently "saved" plan - the ReplacementCalderdale UDP dating from August 2006. NOTE: The following Table only lists those policies whichremain "Saved" following the Direction of the Secretary of State on 25th August 2009. It does not list thepolicies that were deleted by this Direction.

3.8 Under the provisions of paragraph 215 of the NPPF, the weight to be accorded the "saved" policies willdepend upon their compliance with the provisions of the NPPF.The final column in the table below providesguidance to this effect.

3 . Saved Plan

8

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Table 3.1 SAVED POLICIES - Replacement Calderdale Unitary Development Plan (August 2006) asRevised by Direction of the Secretary of State, August 2009

SAVED POLICIES : from 25 August 2009 following the Direction of the Secretary of StateREPLACEMENT CALDERDALE UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

(August 2006)

PART ONE POLICIES

NPPF COMPLIANCESTATUS OFPOLICY

POLICY TITLEPOLICYNUMBER

PART ONE GENERAL PRINCIPLES POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyENCOURAGING SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT

GP1

Compliant in principle – issuesaround whether too muchpriority to brownfield land

Saved PolicyLOCATION OF DEVELOPMENTGP2

PART ONE EMPLOYMENT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyMEETING THE ECONOMIC NEEDS OFTHE DISTRICT

GE1

CompliantSaved PolicyPROVISION OF EMPLOYMENT LANDGE2

CompliantSaved PolicyTHE DEVELOPMENT OF EMPLOYMENTSITES FOR NON EMPLOYMENT USES

GE3

Saved PolicyPRIORITIES FOR THE RECLAMATIONAND RESTORATION OF DERELICTLAND AND BUILDINGS

GE4

PART ONE HOUSING POLICIES

Compliant – seeking to meetobjectively assessed needs

Saved PolicyPROVISION OF ADDITIONALDWELLINGS

GH2

although further work requiredto finalise numbers via LPprocess.

PART ONE RETAILING AND TOWN CENTRES POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyRETAIL STRATEGYGS1

PART ONE OPEN SPACE POLICIES

No Part One Open Space Policies remain "Saved"

3 . Saved Plan

9

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M



(August 2006)

PART ONE BUILT AND HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyTHE CONTRIBUTION OF DESIGN TOTHE QUALITY OF THE BUILTENVIRONMENT

GBE1

Compliance will varydepending upon the land

Saved PolicyPIECEMEAL DEVELOPMENTGBE2

allocation in question, indicatedon the Proposals Map – seeassessment of compliance inthis table for relevant UDPpolicy.

PART ONE TRANSPORT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicySTRATEGIC ROAD NETWORKGT3

CompliantSaved PolicyHIERARCHY OF CONSIDERATIONGT4

CompliantSaved PolicyTRANSPORT ASSESSMENTSGT5

CompliantSaved PolicyHIGHWAYS PROPOSALSGT7

PART ONE INFRASTRUCTURE, EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES POLICIES

Saved PolicyINFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHERNEEDS ARISING FROM DEVELOPMENT

GCF1

Saved PolicyDEVELOPMENT ENABLINGSTATUTORY UNDERTAKERS

GCF2

CompliantSaved PolicySTRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FORCOMMUNITY FACILITIES

GCF3

PART ONE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyCONTAINMENT OF THE URBAN AREAGNE1

CompliantSaved PolicyPROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTGNE2

PART ONE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES

No Part one Environmental Protection Policies remain "Saved"

PART ONE MINERALS POLICIES

Compliant (although referenceis made to regional guidance,

Saved PolicyMINERALS STRATEGYGM1

but the overall principles

3 . Saved Plan

10

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14


(August 2006)

expressed are in line withNPPF)

CompliantSaved PolicyAGGREGATE MINERALSGM2

CompliantSaved PolicyRECYCLINGGM3

PART ONE WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICIES

No Part One Waste Policies remain "saved"

PART TWO POLICIES

PART TWO EMPLOYMENT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyPrimary Employment AreasE1

CompliantSaved PolicyEmployment Development outside thePrimary Employment Areas

E2

Not compliant with para 22sites may be vulnerable if

Saved PolicySites Allocated for Employment UseE3

viability / deliverability notproven.

Not compliant with para 22sites may be vulnerable if

Saved PolicySites Allocated for Mixed-UseE4

viability / deliverability notproven.

Not compliant - may be seenas overly restrictive

Saved PolicySafeguarding Employment Land andBuildings

E5

CompliantSaved PolicySequential Approach for Major B1 OfficeDevelopment

E7

Criteria iii may be seen asbeing non compliant may be

Saved PolicyWarehousingE9

seen as overly restrictive. Restof policy compliant

CompliantSaved PolicyHotels, Motels and Other VisitorAccommodation

E11

CompliantSaved PolicyEncouraging Rural DiversificationE13

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Conversion and Adaptation of RuralBuildings for Commercial or BusinessUses

E14

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Safeguarding of Better QualityAgricultural Land

E15

3 . Saved Plan

11

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M



(August 2006)

Saved PolicyAgricultural and Equestrian DevelopmentE16

Saved PolicyDog and Cat Boarding/Breeding FacilitiesE17

Saved PolicyThe Reclamation and Restoration ofDerelict Land and Buildings

E18

Saved PolicyRegeneration Priority Areas in the UpperCalder Valley

E19

Saved PolicyRegeneration Action Area: SowerbyBridge/Copley Valley

E20

Saved PolicySowerby Bridge Canal WharfE21

Saved PolicyThe Piece HallE22

PART TWO HOUSING POLICIES

Broadly compliant – NPPFsupports mixed uses but silent

Saved PolicySeparation of Housing and IndustryH1

on reasons behind H1 althoughdoes not wish to createadverse effects.

Thrust of Policy compliant butcross-ref to H9 (Non Allocated

Saved PolicyPrimary Housing AreasH2

Sites) and approach togreenfield sites not compliant– see Separate Note producedon interim position for H9.

CompliantSaved PolicyHousing RenewalH3

CompliantSaved PolicyImprovement and Re-use of ExistingDwellings

H4

Not relevant– all allocationsunder construction or built

Saved PolicyPhase 1 Housing AllocationsH5

Not relevant as relates toallocations in RCUDP but

Saved PolicyMonitoring of Housing DevelopmentsH6

emphasis on brownfieldallocations first. New sitephasing policy to beconsidered for Local Plan.

Compliant – promoting housingin sustainable locations but


more relevant to LAADs.Compliance turns on whether 5YHLS - tbd

3 . Saved Plan

12

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14


(August 2006)

Compliant – promoting housingin sustainable locations but


more relevant to LAADs.Compliance turns on whether 5YHLS - tbd

CompliantSaved PolicyNon-Allocated SitesH9

CompliantSaved PolicyDensity of Housing DevelopmentsH10

CompliantSaved PolicyMix of Housing TypesH11

CompliantSaved PolicyLiving Over Shops and Business PremisesH12

CompliantSaved PolicyProvision of Visitability Standard HousingH14

Compliant in principle butviability may be an issue – tobe tested

Saved PolicyLifetime HomesH15

CompliantSaved PolicyHouses In Multiple OccupationH16

CompliantSaved PolicyGypsy SitesH17

PART TWO RETAILING AND TOWN CENTRES POLICIES

Criteria Bi non compliant, restof policy compliant

Saved PolicyCriteria for Assessing RetailDevelopments

S2

CompliantSaved PolicyLocal Shopping Outside CentresS3

CompliantSaved PolicyRetail Developments in the Green BeltS4

CompliantSaved PolicyFarm Shops and Nursery GardensS5

In declining town centres thismay be seen as overly

Saved PolicyPrimary Shopping FrontagesS6

restrictive based on the finalbullet point of NPPF para. 23.In healthy town centres thispolicy is deemed compliant.


Saved PolicySecondary Shopping FrontagesS7



Saved PolicyTertiary Mixed Use FrontageS8

restrictive based on the finalbullet point of NPPF para. 23.

3 . Saved Plan

13

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M



(August 2006)

In healthy town centres thispolicy is deemed compliant.


Saved PolicyNon-Retail Uses in Smaller and LocalCentres

S9


CompliantSaved PolicyHalifax Residential Priority RegenerationArea

S10

CompliantSaved PolicyHalifax Office Amenity AreaS11

CompliantSaved PolicyHalifax Residential Amenity AreaS12

CompliantSaved PolicyHalifax, Mixed-Use Day and NightBusiness Area

S13

CompliantSaved PolicyTemporary Retailing and Car Boot SalesS14

CompliantSaved PolicyHot Food TakeawaysS15

CompliantSaved PolicyShop Fronts in New Retail DevelopmentsS16

CompliantSaved PolicyNew and Replacement Shop FrontsS17

PART TWO OPEN SPACE POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyProtected Open SpacesOS1

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Provision of Open Space in Areas ofDeficiency

OS2

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Provision of Sports and RecreationFacilities

OS4

Compliant but with the use oflocally based standards

Saved PolicyThe Provision of Recreational Open Spacein Residential Development

OS5

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Safeguarding of AllotmentsOS6

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Provision of Allotment SitesOS7

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Within or at the Edge ofCommon Land

OS8

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Recreational Use of Waterways andOpen Water

OS9

CompliantSaved PolicyFormer Halifax Branch CanalOS10

3 . Saved Plan

14

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14


(August 2006)

PART TWO BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyGeneral Design CriteriaBE1

CompliantSaved PolicyPrivacy, Daylighting and Amenity SpaceBE2

CompliantSaved PolicyLandscapingBE3

CompliantSaved PolicySafety and Security ConsiderationsBE4

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Design and Layout of Highways andAccesses

BE5

CompliantSaved PolicyThe Provision of Safe PedestrianEnvironments

BE6

CompliantSaved PolicyCCTV and Area Lighting SchemesBE7

CompliantSaved PolicyAccess for AllBE8

CompliantSaved SavedThe Provision of Public Conveniences andBaby Facilities

BE9

CompliantSaved PolicyArt in Public PlacesBE10

CompliantSaved PolicyTelecommunicationsBE11

CompliantSaved PolicyAlteration and Extension of ListedBuildings

BE14

CompliantSaved PolicySetting of a Listed BuildingBE15

CompliantSaved PolicyChange of Use of a Listed BuildingBE16

CompliantSaved SavedDemolition of a Listed BuildingBE17

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment within Conservation AreasBE18

CompliantSaved PolicyDemolition within a Conservation AreaBE19

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Registered Historic Parksand Gardens

BE20

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Locally Designated HistoricParks and Gardens

BE21

CompliantSaved PolicyArchaeological Sites of NationalSignificance

BE22

CompliantSaved PolicyArchaeological Sites of RegionalImportance

BE23

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Sites of Archaeological ValueBE24

3 . Saved Plan

15

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M



(August 2006)

PART TWO TRANSPORT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyTravel PlansT1

CompliantSaved PolicyPublic Transport Provision at NewDevelopment

T3

CompliantSaved PolicyBus Station and Passenger Facilities atBrighouse, Elland and other Locations

T4

CompliantSaved PolicyRural Service CentresT6

Compliant (although no ref inNPPF)

Saved PolicyPrivate Hire Operating CentresT7

Compliant (although no ref inNPPF)

Saved PolicyTaxi and Private Hire Radio OfficesT8

Compliant (however may beasked to evidence need forprotection)

Saved PolicyProtection of the Sites of Former RailwayLines

T11

CompliantSaved PolicyCyclewaysT13

CompliantSaved PolicyNew and Extended Pedestrian PrioritySchemes

T16

CompliantSaved PolicyAbandoned Highway ProposalsT17

Compliant (however may beasked to evidence)

Saved PolicyMaximum Parking AllowancesT18


Saved PolicyBicycle Parking GuidanceT19


Saved PolicyMotorcycle/Moped/Scooter ParkingGuidance

T20

CompliantSaved PolicyCar Free and Low Car Ownership HousingT21

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment of Garage CourtsT22

CompliantSaved PolicyHelicopter Landing FacilitiesT26

CompliantSaved PolicySafeguarding Aerodromes and Air TrafficTechnical Sites

T27

PART TWO INFRASTRUCTURE, EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyRelease of Surplus Educational Land andBuildings

CF5

3 . Saved Plan

16

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14


(August 2006)

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Involving the Loss of VillageShops, Post Offices, Public Houses orHotels

CF6

Saved SavedCemeteriesCF7

Saved PolicyCollective Needs Accommodation andResidential/Nursing Homes

CF8

Saved PolicyDay Care Facilities for ChildrenCF9

Criteria i non compliant, rest ofpolicy compliant

Saved PolicyMedical, Dental or Health FacilitiesCF10

Saved PolicyMajor Leisure/Entertainment UsesCF11

PART TWO NATURAL ENVIRONMENT POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyExtension and Alteration to OtherBuildings in the Green Belt

NE3

CompliantSaved PolicyConversion or Change of Use of Buildingsin the Green Belt

NE4

CompliantSaved PolicyReplacement Dwellings in the Green BeltNE5

CompliantSaved PolicyNew Gardens in the Green BeltNE6

Compliant but may need todemonstrate how development

Saved PolicyDevelopment Within The Named VillageEnvelopes in the Green Belt

NE7

would affect open character(para 86)

Compliant (para 28, 55) –although may be open to

Saved PolicyAppropriate Development for the AreaAround Todmorden

NE8

challenge on fringe of urbanareas

Non-compliant particularlycriteria i and ii NPPF talks

Saved PolicyDevelopment Within Settlements in theArea Around Todmorden

NE9

about isolated development incountryside but this policy talksabout outside urban area – willbe especially difficult if cannotidentify 5yr supply thereforeedge of urban area may besusceptible. (possible para 28still assists for some sites i.e.intrinsic character plussustainable location)

Non-compliant but could beargued against para 28.

Saved PolicyGarden Extensions Within the AreaAround Todmorden

NE10

3 . Saved Plan

17

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M



(August 2006)

Compliant para 85Saved PolicyProtected LandNE11

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Within the SpecialLandscape Area

NE12

Compliant (although no NNRsin Calderdale)

Saved PolicyProtection of Sites of National ImportanceNE13

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Locally Important SitesNE14

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment in Wildlife CorridorsNE15

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Protected SpeciesNE16

CompliantSaved PolicyBiodiversity EnhancementNE17

CompliantSaved PolicyEcological Protection of Water AreasNE18

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Ancient WoodlandNE19

CompliantSaved PolicyTree Preservation OrdersNE20

CompliantSaved PolicyTrees and Development SitesNE21

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of HedgerowsNE22

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Stone WallsNE23

PART TWO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Air QualityEP1

CompliantSaved PolicyControl of External LightingEP5

CompliantSaved PolicyDangerous Substance EstablishmentsEP6

CompliantSaved PolicyNew or Extended Dangerous SubstanceEstablishments

EP7

CompliantSaved PolicyOther Incompatible UsesEP8

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment of Contaminated SitesEP9

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment of Sites with PotentialContamination

EP10

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment on Potentially Unstable LandEP11

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Water ResourcesEP12

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Involving Non-MainsDrainage

EP13

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of GroundwaterEP14

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Alongside WaterwaysEP15

3 . Saved Plan

18

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14


(August 2006)

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Washland and FunctionalFloodplain

EP16

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection of Indicative FloodplainEP17

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Behind Flood DefencesEP18

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment Outside FloodplainsEP19

CompliantSaved PolicyProtection from Flood RiskEP20

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopments Involving WatercourseImprovements

EP21

CompliantSaved PolicySustainable Drainage SystemsEP22

CompliantSaved PolicyCulverting of WatercoursesEP23

CompliantSaved PolicyControl of Overhead Electricity LinesEP24

CompliantSaved PolicyEnergy Efficient DevelopmentEP25

CompliantSaved PolicyEncouraging the Use of Combined Heatand Power Systems

EP26

Compliant – subject to viabilitytesting

Saved PolicyRenewable Energy in DevelopmentsEP27

CompliantSaved PolicyDevelopment of Renewable EnergySources

EP28

Compliant – although NPPFsilent

Saved PolicyDevelopments Close to RenewableEnergy Installations

EP29

CompliantSaved PolicyWind Power DevelopmentsEP30

Compliant – no specific ref inNPPF

Saved PolicyDevelopment Incorporating Solar Heatingand Power Systems

EP31

Compliant - no specific ref inNPPF

Saved PolicyProtection of Solar Heating, PhotovoltaicPanel and Passive Solar DesignDevelopments

EP32

CompliantSaved PolicyRenewable Power GenerationEP33

PART TWO MINERALS POLICIES

CompliantSaved PolicyCriteria for Assessing All Mineral WorkingProposals

M1

CompliantSaved PolicyDetails Required with any MineralsPlanning Application

M2

NPPF silentSaved PolicyExtensions to Existing WorkingsM3

3 . Saved Plan

19

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M



(August 2006)

Compliant in terms of thepolicy principle– but the

Saved PolicySafeguarding Mineral ResourcesM4

methodology for safeguardingMinerals has changedtherefore the extent of thesafeguarded areas in the LocalPlan will be greater.

CompliantSaved PolicyCoal Extraction and Colliery Spoil DisposalM5

Compliant against first bulletpoint of para 147 but RCUDP

Saved PolicyOil and GasM6

silent on Para 147 bullet points2, 3, and 4.

Non Compliant althoughRCUDP policy very restrictive

Saved PolicyPeatM7

MPG14 not replaced by NPPFSaved PolicyReview of Mineral Working SitesM8

NPPF refers to intermittentworking and small scale

Saved PolicyRe-working of Mineral DepositsM9

extraction at relic quarriesotherwise NPPF silent.

CompliantSaved PolicyRecyclingM10

PART TWO WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICIES

PPS10 Planning forSustainable Waste

Saved PolicyCriteria for Assessing Waste ManagementFacilities

WM1

Management not replaced byNPPF


Saved PolicyInformation Required with Applications forWaste Management Facilities

WM2



Saved PolicyLandfilling of WastesWM3



Saved PolicyRecycling at Existing Household WasteDisposal Sites

WM4



Saved PolicyProvision of Household Waste DisposalSites

WM5


3 . Saved Plan

20

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14


(August 2006)


Saved PolicyTransfer and Treatment of WasteWM6



Saved PolicyDigestion and Mixed Waste CompostingWM7



Saved PolicyGreen Waste CompostingWM8



Saved PolicyIncinerationWM9



Saved PolicyReworking of Former Landfill SitesWM10


3.9 The future publication of the Preferred Options draft of the Local Plan will show where potential newpolicies are proposed to replace or delete "saved" policies from the RCUDP. Whilst the weight to beaccorded to the Preferred Options policies will be low, given the status of the emerging plan, the suggestedchanges to policy status will be included in future AMRs for information.

3 . Saved Plan

21

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


4.1 The Government has introduced powers through the Localism Act 2011 for a number of new communitybased neighbourhood planning initiatives. All the new approaches will require examination by anindependent inspector as well as endorsement at referendum by a majority of those voting.

4.2 The Council published Neighbourhood Development Plans Guidance in March 2013 which is availableto view on the Council's web-site.

Neighbourhood Development Plans

4.3 Neighbourhood Development Plans enable communities to plan the future of their area by providingpolicies and allocations for the use of land. Once the plan is in place it will become a formal part of theplanning policy for an area alongside the Local Plan for Calderdale.

4.4 Parish and Town Councils are recognised as 'qualifying bodies' and can take the lead in preparing a Planfor the area they cover. In non-parished areas an existing community group or a newly formedneighbourhood forum can apply to become a qualifying body and take on this role.

4.5 A number of communities, both within and outside parished areas, are developing Neighbourhood Plans.These plan areas are set out below and illustrated in Map 4.1.

Map 4.1 Neighbourhood Areas

Park Ward

4.6 This Ward based community has been designated as a Neighbourhood Forum and Area under theprovisions of Section 61F and 61G of the Town & County Planning Act 1990 (as amended),and isprogressing a Neighbourhood Development Plan for the Ward.

4 . Neighbourhood Planning

22

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Hebden Royd and Hilltop Parishes

4.7 The combined Parish and Town Council area of Hebden Royd Town Council, together with Blackshaw;Erringden; Heptonstall and Wadsworth Parish Councils has been designated as a neighbourhood areaunder Section 61G of the Town & County Planning Act 1990 (as amended),and is progressing aNeighbourhood Development Plan for the combined area.

Ripponden

4.8 Ripponden Parish Council has formally applied to the Council for the designation of a Neighbourhoodarea under Section 61G of the Town & County Planning Act 1990 (as amended). The Council will beconsidering this application in early 2015. If it is approved Ripponden Parish Council will be given thepowers to take forward neighbourhood planning within the area that they administer.

Neighbourhood Development Orders

4.9 Neighbourhood Development Orders (NDO) can be used to grant planning permission to certain types ofdevelopment in a particular location. No interest in Neighbourhood Development Orders has currentlybeen shown in Calderdale, but the Parishes and Park Ward may consider NDOs as part of their planningwork.

Community Right to Build Orders

4.10 Community Right to Build Orders are a type of Neighbourhood Development Plan which enable a communityto deliver small-scale, site specific development without the need for a separate planning application. Nointerest in Community Right to Build has currently been shown in Calderdale.

4 . Neighbourhood Planning

23

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


5.1 The Council has the power through the planning system to set charges associated with development forshortfalls in infrastructure funding, or provide new infrastructure not already funded. In recognition of thisthe Council are considering the introduction of a local ‘development tax’ through the CommunityInfrastructure Levy(CIL). CIL is a tax on new floorspace of certain types of development. It partly replacesSection 106 Contributions, but does not at the time of writing, fund affordable housing.

5.2 The Government has suggested that CIL will remain as the intended primary charging method for obtainingcontributions from planning permissions, and new Regulations were issued in 2012, 20143 and 2014.TheGovernment are clear that developers can only bear a certain level of contribution from planning obligations.Therefore any local CIL charging schedule set by Calderdale Council must be subject to a thorough viabilityassessment to ensure that development would not be overly inhibited by its introduction.

5.3 The Council has commissioned consultants GVA to assess the viability of the introduction of CIL and toadvise on a preliminary draft charging schedule. This work is currently being undertaken and will informany decision by the Authority to take forward CIL.

5 . Community Infrastructure Levy

24

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

6.1

The

Loc

alis

m A

ct (

2011

) in

trod

uced

a D

uty

to C

o-op

erat

e w

hich

is p

lace

d on

Loc

al A

utho

ritie

s an

d ot

her

publ

ic b

odie

s in

res

pect

of a

ctiv

ity r

elat

ing

to ‘p

lan

mak

ing’

.

6.2

Cal

derd

ale

Cou

ncil

cont

inue

s to

wor

k cl

osel

y w

ith o

ther

aut

horit

ies

on th

e D

uty

to C

o-op

erat

e. M

uch

of th

is w

ork

has

cent

red

arou

nd L

eeds

City

Reg

ion

auth

oriti

es a

nd jo

int w

orki

ng o

n a

num

ber

of c

ross

bou

ndar

y is

sues

whi

ch w

ill in

fluen

ce lo

cal '

plan

mak

ing'

. Muc

h of

this

wor

k co

ntin

ues

tobe

und

erta

ken

thro

ugh

regu

lar

mee

tings

of t

he L

eeds

City

Reg

ion

Str

ateg

ic P

lann

ing

(Dut

y to

Coo

pera

te)

Gro

up a

nd it

s to

pic

sub-

grou

ps.T

heis

sues

bei

ng d

iscu

ssed

incl

ude

tran

spor

t, ho

usin

g, re

taili

ng, m

iner

als

and

was

te a

nd th

e C

omm

unity

Infr

astr

uctu

re L

evy.

The

Cou

ncil

also

con

tinue

sto

par

ticip

ate

in e

vent

s or

gani

sed

by n

eigh

bour

ing

loca

l aut

horit

ies

and

whe

re th

ere

is th

e po

tent

ial f

or c

ross

bou

ndar

y w

orki

ng, p

artic

ular

ly th

ose

exam

inin

g ev

iden

ce o

n ho

usin

g m

atte

rs a

nd v

iabi

lity

issu

es. A

join

t upd

ate

to th

e S

trat

egic

Flo

od R

isk

Ass

essm

ent a

lso

com

men

ced

durin

g 20

13,

invo

lvin

g K

irkle

es a

nd W

akef

ield

loca

l aut

horit

ies.

6.3

As

repo

rted

pre

viou

sly

a si

gnifi

cant

am

ount

of w

ork

was

und

erta

ken

with

Kirk

lees

Cou

ncil

in re

latio

n to

the

publ

icat

ion

vers

ion

of th

eir C

ore

Str

ateg

y.T

hrou

gh th

e D

uty

to C

o-op

erat

e pr

oces

s a

num

ber

of k

ey is

sues

wer

e hi

ghlig

hted

with

Kirk

lees

, inc

ludi

ng tr

affic

gen

erat

ion,

em

ploy

men

t site

s,he

ritag

e as

sets

, hou

sing

and

the

Gre

en B

elt.

Man

y of

thes

e is

sues

wer

e re

solv

ed th

roug

h di

scus

sion

alth

ough

the

Cou

ncil

subm

itted

form

alre

pres

enta

tions

on

othe

rs in

clud

ing

issu

es re

late

d to

the

prop

osed

em

ploy

men

t site

at C

oope

r Brid

ge a

nd re

port

ed in

the

2012

/201

3 A

MR

. Fol

low

ing

the

with

draw

al o

f the

Kirk

lees

Cor

e S

trat

egy

from

exa

min

atio

n, d

ue to

the

insp

ecto

r no

t bei

ng s

atis

fied

that

the

Dut

y to

Coo

pera

te h

ad b

een

met

,K

irkle

es h

ave

reso

lved

to p

repa

re a

sin

gle

Loca

l Pla

n an

d re

vise

d th

eir

timet

able

acc

ordi

ngly

. Cal

derd

ale

Cou

ncil

will

con

tinue

to w

ork

with

Kirk

lees

in a

n at

tem

pt to

bot

h re

solv

e an

y is

sues

whi

ch m

ay a

rise

prio

r to

pub

licat

ion

of th

e re

vise

d pl

an a

nd p

ursu

e an

y op

port

uniti

es fo

r jo

int e

vide

nce

stud

ies.

An

exam

ple

of th

e la

tter

is th

e jo

intly

com

mis

sion

ed 'C

alde

rdal

e an

d K

irkle

es J

oint

Tra

velle

r N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent',

cur

rent

ly in

pre

para

tion,

havi

ng c

omm

ence

d si

nce

the

end

of th

e m

onito

ring

year

and

whi

ch w

ill b

e re

port

ed o

n in

the

next

AM

R.

6.4

The

follo

win

g ta

ble

sets

out

a s

umm

ary

of s

ome

of th

e m

ost s

igni

fican

t iss

ues

of in

volv

emen

t bet

wee

n th

e C

ounc

il an

d ne

ighb

ourin

g au

thor

ities

betw

een

Mar

ch 2

011

and

Dec

embe

r 20

14, s

truc

ture

d ar

ound

pub

lishe

d pl

anni

ng d

ocum

ents

.

Tab

le 6

.1 C

o-o

per

atio

n w

ith

nei

gh

bo

uri

ng

au

tho

riti

es

Rel

evan

tst

rate

gic

pri

ori

ty in

NP

PF

Par

a 15

6

Ag

reed

Act

ion

/Res

po

nse

Mo

nit

ori

ng

incl

ud

ing

key

ind

icat

ors

an

dtr

igg

er p

oin

ts

Res

olu

tio

n/M

itig

atio

n- h

ow th

e is

sue

can

be

over

com

e/m

anag

ed

Evi

den

ce t

osh

ow

ther

e is

an

issu

e

Imp

act

- w

hy it

is a

n is

sue

for

Cal

der

dal

e

Su

mm

ary

of

the

issu

eN

eig

hb

ou

rin

gA

uth

ori

ty

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

Non

e at

this

sta

geLo

cal P

lan

Par

t2:

Lan

d

use

Allo

catio

ns

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

dN

o im

plic

atio

nsid

entif

ied

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

dC

ore

Str

ateg

yP

ublic

atio

nB

orou

gh o

fP

endl

e

6 . Co-operation and joint working

25

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


Rel

evan

tst

rate

gic

pri

ori

ty in

NP

PF

Par

a 15

6

Ag

reed

Act

ion

/Res

po

nse

Mo

nit

ori

ng

incl

ud

ing

key

ind

icat

ors

an

dtr

igg

er p

oin

ts

Res

olu

tio

n/M

itig

atio

n- h

ow th

e is

sue

can

be

over

com

e/m

anag

ed

Evi

den

ce t

osh

ow

ther

e is

an

issu

e

Imp

act

- w

hy it

is a

n is

sue

for

Cal

der

dal

e

Su

mm

ary

of

the

issu

eN

eig

hb

ou

rin

gA

uth

ori

ty

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

Non

e at

this

sta

geR

evie

w o

f Iss

ues

and

Opt

ions

Con

sulta

tion.

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

d at

this

sta

geN

o im

plic

atio

nsid

entif

ied

at th

isst

age

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

d at

this

stag

e

Loca

l Pla

nIs

sues

and

Opt

ions

Bur

nley

Cou

ncil

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

Non

e at

this

sta

geR

evie

wS

ubm

issi

onve

rsio

n of

Cor

e

Dis

cuss

ions

hel

d w

ithB

radf

ord

MD

C a

ndco

mm

ents

pro

vide

d to

cons

ulta

tion.

Con

sulta

tion

docu

men

tsid

entif

ied

site

s in

Que

ensb

ury

and

Pot

entia

l gro

wth

near

Cal

derd

ale

bord

er a

ndim

pact

upo

nG

reen

Bel

t

Cor

e S

trat

egy

Pub

licat

ion

City

of

Bra

dfor

d M

DC

Str

ateg

y an

dea

rly d

rafts

of

Sou

th W

est

Land

Allo

catio

nsB

radf

ord

for

docu

men

tde

velo

pmen

t. In

(pro

gram

med

toad

ditio

n M

iner

al(c

omm

ence

2015

)S

afe

Gua

rdin

gA

reas

are

like

ly to

stre

tch

acro

ssbo

th d

istr

ict

boun

darie

s.

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

To b

e de

term

ined

but i

nclu

ding

liais

on d

urin

gpr

epar

atio

n of

Loca

l Pla

n

App

rais

al o

fK

irkle

es s

ingl

eLo

cal P

lan

follo

win

gW

ithdr

awal

of t

heC

ore

Str

ateg

y

Pos

ition

to b

ere

-app

rais

ed d

urin

gpr

epar

atio

n of

Loc

alP

lan.

Var

ious

as

repo

rted

in20

12/2

013

AM

R.

Hou

sing

,

Em

ploy

men

tLa

nd (

incl

udin

gst

rate

gic

empl

oym

ent s

iteat

Coo

per

Brid

ge),

Ser

vice

s,

Tran

spor

t,

Con

sulta

tion

onC

ore

Str

ateg

yS

ubm

issi

onS

epte

mbe

r20

12

Kirk

lees

MC

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

Non

e at

this

sta

geR

evie

w a

t nex

tst

age

ofco

nsul

tatio

n

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

dN

o im

plic

atio

nsid

entif

ied

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

dS

ite A

lloca

tions

DP

D S

copi

ngR

epor

t and

Cal

l

Old

ham

Cou

ncil


26

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Rel

evan

tst

rate

gic

pri

ori

ty in

NP

PF

Par

a 15

6

Ag

reed

Act

ion

/Res

po

nse

Mo

nit

ori

ng

incl

ud

ing

key

ind

icat

ors

an

dtr

igg

er p

oin

ts

Res

olu

tio

n/M

itig

atio

n- h

ow th

e is

sue

can

be

over

com

e/m

anag

ed

Evi

den

ce t

osh

ow

ther

e is

an

issu

e

Imp

act

- w

hy it

is a

n is

sue

for

Cal

der

dal

e

Su

mm

ary

of

the

issu

eN

eig

hb

ou

rin

gA

uth

ori

ty

(Pub

licat

ion

2015

)fo

r S

ites

Con

sulta

tion

May

201

2

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

Non

e at

this

sta

geR

evie

wA

lloca

tions

DP

DF

ollo

win

g di

scus

sion

at

a du

ty to

co-

oper

ate

mee

ting

in A

ugus

t 201

2

The

sub

mis

sion

vers

ion

does

not

prop

ose

any

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

d.C

ore

Str

ateg

yS

ubm

issi

onM

ay 2

013

(exa

min

atio

n)

Roc

hdal

e M

BC

no im

plic

atio

ns w

ere

iden

tifie

d.si

gnifi

cant

deve

lopm

ent i

ncl

ose

prox

imity

toth

e C

alde

rdal

ebo

unda

ry.

All

stra

tegi

cpr

iorit

ies

Non

e at

this

sta

geR

evie

w a

t nex

tst

age

ofco

nsul

tatio

n

No

impl

icat

ions

iden

tifie

dN

o im

plic

atio

nsid

entif

ied

Gre

en B

elt

mod

ifica

tions

but n

oim

plic

atio

nsid

entif

ied

Live

s an

dLa

ndsc

apes

DP

Dco

nsul

tatio

n20

12 a

ndsp

ecifi

cre

-con

sulta

tion

on G

reen

Bel

tch

ange

s (2

014)

Ros

send

ale

BC

6.5

In a

dditi

on to

nei

ghbo

urin

g au

thor

ities

and

oth

er L

eeds

City

Reg

ion

auth

oriti

es d

iscu

ssio

ns a

nd m

odel

ling

wor

k ha

ve b

een

unde

rtak

en w

ith th

eH

ighw

ays

Age

ncy

to a

sses

s th

e po

tent

ial i

mpa

ct o

f gro

wth

pro

posa

ls w

ithin

Cal

derd

ale

and

othe

r au

thor

ities

upo

n th

e S

trat

egic

Roa

d N

etw

ork.

6.6

The

Cou

ncil

has

prev

ious

ly u

nder

take

n st

udie

s w

ith o

ther

Sou

th P

enni

ne a

utho

ritie

s on

ren

ewab

le a

nd lo

w c

arbo

n en

ergy

and

land

scap

e ca

paci

tyst

udy

for w

ind

ener

gy d

evel

opm

ents

.The

se e

arlie

r stu

dies

hav

e le

d to

furt

her j

oint

wor

k w

ith th

e S

outh

Pen

nine

aut

horit

ies

of B

lack

burn

and

Dar

wen

BC

, Bur

nley

BC

, Hyn

dbur

n B

C, K

irkle

es M

C, P

endl

e B

C, R

ochd

ale

MB

C a

nd R

osse

ndal

e B

C o

n La

ndsc

ape

Gui

danc

e fo

r Win

d Tu

rbin

es u

p to

60m

high

in th

e S

outh

and

Wes

t Pen

nine

s. In

add

ition

dur

ing

2014

an

upda

te to

the

earli

er S

outh

Pen

nine

s W

ind

Ene

rgy

Land

scap

e S

tudy

(20

10)

has


27

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


been

und

erta

ken

with

Kirk

lees

, Bar

nsle

y, B

urnl

ey a

nd R

osse

ndal

e C

ounc

ils.T

his

wor

k al

so in

clud

ed th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

web

bas

ed m

ap a

ndda

taba

se s

how

ing

the

dist

ribut

ion

of w

ind

turb

ines

acr

oss

both

the

stud

y ar

ea a

nd a

lso

with

ing

a 30

km b

uffe

r.T

his

is to

be

upda

ted

regu

larly

by

the

auth

oriti

es p

artic

ipat

ing

in th

e st

udy,

bot

h w

ith in

form

atio

n re

latin

g to

thei

r ow

n di

stric

ts a

nd th

at s

ourc

ed fr

om o

ther

loca

l aut

horit

ies

with

in th

e 30

kmbu

ffer.

6.7

Cal

derd

ale

has

also

con

sulte

d al

l nei

ghbo

urin

g au

thor

ities

, inc

ludi

ng L

anca

shire

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

and

the

Gre

ater

Man

ches

ter

Aut

horit

ies,

and

oth

erpu

blic

bod

ies

on p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts in

clud

ing

the

Cor

e S

trat

egy

Pre

ferr

ed O

ptio

ns d

ocum

ent (

Aut

umn

2012

). A

s th

e C

ounc

il pr

ogre

sses

the

sing

leLo

cal P

lan

sign

ifica

nt w

ork

will

be

unde

rtak

en w

ith n

eigh

bour

ing

auth

oriti

es a

nd s

tatu

tory

und

erta

kers

dur

ing

2015

.


28

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Core Output Indicators

7.1 The following tables set out the Council's response for the year 2013/2014 to the core output indicators,previously required to be monitored by Communities and Local Government (CLG); post Localism Act2011 however, these indicators are now optional. Calderdale continues to monitor against all core indicators,with the exception of housing quality (Building for Life assessments). The continual monitoring of thehistoric core indicators helps to maintain an effective time series of data against these established measures.Whilst full definitions of the indicators were provided in the Core Output Indicators document publishedby CLG, for ease of reference brief descriptions of the various indicators are provided below:

Table 7.1 - Summary of the Core Output Indicators reported below

Business Development and Town Centres

Total amount of additional employment floorspace - by typeBD1*

Total amount of employment floorspace on previously developed land - by typeBD2*

Employment land available - by typeBD3*

Total amount of floorspace for 'town centre uses'BD4

Housing

Plan period and housing targetsH1

Net additional dwellings - in previous yearsH2(a)

Net additional dwellings - for the reporting yearH2(b)

Net additional dwellings - in future yearsH2(c)

Managed delivery targetH2(d)

New and converted dwellings - on previously developed land (PDL)H3

Net additional pitches (Gypsy and Traveller)H4

Gross affordable housing completionsH5

Environmental Quality

Number of planning permissions granted contrary to Environment Agency advice on flooding and waterquality grounds

E1

Change in areas of biodiversity importanceE2

Renewable energy generationE3

Minerals

Production of primary land won aggregates by mineral planning authorityM1

Production of secondary and recycled aggregates by mineral planning authorityM2

Waste

Capacity of new waste management facilities by waste planning authorityW1

Amount of municipal waste arising, and managed by management type by waste planning authorityW2

* Due to monitoring difficulties the 2013/14 figures do not take into account all planning applications which have been commenced or completed and does not monitor all change of uses. Therefore comparison is difficult

with previous years. The employment monitoring procedure is under review and future AMRs will be revised to ensure consistency of outputs)

7 . Monitoring Indicators

29

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


Tab

le 7

.2 T

ota

l am

ou

nt

of

add

itio

nal

em

plo

ymen

t fl

oo

rsp

ace

- by

typ

e

Tota

lB

8B

2B

1cB

1bB

1a

7,62

21,

000

5,05

629

01,

537

Gro

ss (

m2 )

(201

3-14

mon

itorin

gpe

riod)

BD

1

-12,

651

-635

-10,

351

-950

0-7

15Lo

ss (

m2 )

-5,0

2936

5-5

,295

-921

082

2N

et*

(201

3-14

mo

nit

ori

ng

per

iod

)

7,62

21,

000

5,05

629

01,

537

Gro

ss (

m2 )

BD

2

100

100

100

100

-10

0%

gro

ss o

n P

DL

98.9

720

.01

44.3

88.

170.

6625

.75

Hec

tare

s (p

lann

ing

perm

issi

ons

and

com

men

cem

ents

)B

D3

103.

151

Hec

tare

s (E

mpl

oym

ent A

lloca

tions

)**

38.0

01H

ecta

res

(Mix

ed U

se A

lloca

tions

)***

240.

122

Hec

tare

s (T

ota

l)

* T

hese

figu

res

incl

ude

loss

es th

roug

h ch

ange

of u

se a

nd d

emol

ition

s.

** E

mpl

oym

ent a

lloca

tions

are

gen

eral

ly n

ot b

roke

n do

wn

into

spe

cific

B u

ses

with

in th

e R

CU

DP

200

6 an

d th

eref

ore

figur

es fo

r th

e di

ffere

nt B

cla

sses

can

not b

e pr

ovid

ed.

***

The

RC

UD

P 2

006

iden

tifie

s se

vera

l site

s al

loca

ted

for

mix

ed u

se in

clud

ing

B u

ses.

The

figu

re a

bove

is fo

r th

e si

te s

ize.

It is

unl

ikel

y th

at th

e w

hole

of t

he m

ixed

-use

site

s w

ould

be

deve

lope

d fo

r B

use

s.

Tab

le 7

.3 T

ota

l am

ou

nt

of

flo

ors

pac

e fo

r 'to

wn

cen

tre

use

s'.

Tota

lD

2B

1aA

2A

1

2,67

61,

004

1,53

775

60G

ross

(m

2 )i)

in to

wn

cent

rear

eas

BD

4

2,38

81,

004

1324

75-1

5N

et (

m2 )*

(201

3-14

mon

itorin

gpe

riod)

n/a

n/a

n/a

-10

Net

trad

eabl

e (m

2 )


30

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Tota

lD

2B

1aA

2A

1

13,5

692,

534

1,53

775

9,42

3G

ross

(m

2 )ii)

in lo

cal a

utho

rity

area

13,1

812,

534

1,22

475

9,34

8N

et (

m2 )*

(201

3-14

mon

itorin

gpe

riod)

n/a

n/a

n/a

2,44

4N

et tr

adea

ble

(m2 )

* T

hese

figu

res

incl

ude

loss

es th

roug

h ch

ange

of u

se a

nd d

emol

ition

s.

Tab

le 7

.4 P

lan

per

iod

an

d h

ou

sin

g t

arg

ets

So

urc

e o

f p

lan

Tar

get

Tota

l ho

usi

ng

Req

uir

edE

nd

of

Pla

n p

erio

dS

tart

of

Pla

n p

erio

d

Ado

pted

RC

UD

P (

Aug

ust 2

006)

6,75

031

/3/2

016

1/4/

2001

H1

Ado

pted

RS

S (

May

200

8)14

,060

31/3

/202

61/

4/20

04H

1 (b

) (if

req

uire

d)

Tab

le 7

.5 N

et a

dd

itio

nal

dw

ellin

gs

27/2

826

/27

25/2

624

/25

23/2

422

/23

21/2

220

/21

19/2

05

18/1

94

17/1

83

16/1

72

15/1

61

14/1

5C

UR

13/1

4R

EP

12/1

311

/12

10/1

109

/10

08/0

907

/08

06/0

705

/06

04/0

5

505

490

487

704

709

1350

1363

1179

828

H2a

339

H2b

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

630

630

630

630

630

320

a) N

etA

dditi

ons

H2c

2121

2121

21b) H

ecta

res*

450

450

450

450

450

c)Ta

rget

RC

UD

P

670

670

670

670

670

c) Targ

et R

SS

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

600

550

500

450

320

H2d

RC

UD

P20

06

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

800

600

550

500

450

320

H2d

RS

S20

08

*bas

ed o

n 30

dph

(dw

ellin

gs p

er h

ecta

re)


31

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


Tab

le 7

.6 N

ew a

nd

co

nver

ted

dw

ellin

gs

- o

n p

revi

ou

sly

dev

elo

ped

lan

d.

Tota

l

500

gros

sH

3

85.2

% g

ross

on

PD

L

Tab

le 7

.7 N

et a

dd

itio

nal

pit

ches

(G

ypsy

an

d T

rave

ller)

Tota

lTr

ansi

tP

erm

anen

t

00

0H

4

Tab

le 7

.8 G

ross

aff

ord

able

ho

usi

ng

co

mp

leti

on

s

Aff

ord

able

ho

mes

To

tal

Inte

rmed

iate

ho

mes

pro

vid

edS

oci

al/A

ffo

rdab

le r

ent

ho

mes

pro

vid

ed

126

2510

1H

5

Tab

le 7

.9 N

um

ber

of

pla

nn

ing

per

mis

sio

ns

gra

nte

d c

on

trar

y to

Env

iro

nm

ent

Ag

ency

ad

vice

on

flo

od

ing

an

d w

ater

qu

alit

y g

rou

nd

s.

Tota

lQ

ual

ity

Flo

od

ing

00

0E

1

Tab

le 7

.10

Ch

ang

e in

are

as o

f b

iod

iver

sity

imp

ort

ance

.

Tota

lA

dd

itio

nal

Lo

ss

10,6

01 h

a4

0E

2


32

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Tab

le 7

.11

Ren

ewab

le e

ner

gy

gen

erat

ion

Tota

lb

iom

ass

hyd

roso

lar

ph

oto

volt

aics

win

d o

nsh

ore

E3

Pla

nt

bio

mas

sA

nim

alb

iom

ass

Co

-fir

ing

of

bio

mas

sw

ith

so

lidfu

els

Mu

nic

ipal

(an

din

du

stri

al)

solid

was

teco

mbu

stio

n

Sew

age

slu

dg

ed

iges

tio

n

Lan

dfi

llg

as

1.05

40

00

00

0N

otK

now

n0.

044

1.01

Per

mitt

ed

capa

city

(13/

14) i

nM

W

26.0

30

00

00

1.14

0.01

10.

3824

.5C

ompl

eted

inst

alle

d ca

paci

tyin

MW

Rev

iew

of t

he m

onito

ring

proc

edur

es fo

r th

is in

dica

tor

(E3)

will

take

pla

ce, c

urre

ntly

min

or d

omes

tic in

stal

latio

ns m

ay ta

ke p

lace

whi

ch a

re n

ot p

ossi

ble

to m

onito

r.

Tab

le 7

.12

Pro

du

ctio

n o

f p

rim

ary

lan

d w

on

ag

gre

gat

es b

y m

iner

al p

lan

nin

g a

uth

ori

ty

San

d a

nd

Gra

vel

Cru

shed

Ro

ck

0A

ppro

xim

atel

y 45

,000

tonn

esM

1

Tab

le 7

.13

Pro

du

ctio

n o

f se

con

dar

y an

d r

ecyc

led

ag

gre

gat

es b

y m

iner

al p

lan

nin

g a

uth

ori

ty

Rec

ycle

dS

eco

nd

ary

70,0

00 to

nnes

0M

2


33

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


The

follo

win

g ta

ble

show

s on

ly th

ose

type

s of

was

te fa

cilit

ies

that

hav

e be

en g

rant

ed p

lann

ing

perm

issi

on in

the

repo

rtin

g pe

riod.

Whe

re n

o pe

rmis

sion

sha

ve b

een

gran

ted,

the

was

te fa

cilit

y ty

pe h

as b

een

rem

oved

from

the

tabl

e.

Tab

le 7

.14

Cap

acit

y o

f n

ew w

aste

man

agem

ent

faci

litie

s by

was

te p

lan

nin

g

TOTA

LR

ecyc

ling

faci

litie

s co

nst

ruct

ion

,d

emo

litio

n a

nd

exc

avat

ion

was

teTr

ansf

er s

tati

on

sIn

ert

lan

dfi

llW

1

5,00

0 to

nnes

05,

000

tonn

es0

The

tota

l cap

acity

(m

³ to

nnes

or

litre

s)

5,00

0 to

nnes

N/A

5,00

0 to

nnes

N/A

Max

imum

ann

ual o

pera

tiona

l thr

ough

put

(ton

nes

(or

litre

s if

liqui

d w

aste

))

Tab

le 7

.15

Am

ou

nt

of

mu

nic

ipal

was

te a

risi

ng

, an

d m

anag

ed b

y m

anag

emen

t ty

pe

by w

aste

pla

nn

ing

au

tho

rity

Tota

l was

te a

risi

ng

Oth

erR

ecyc

led

/co

mp

ost

edM

SW

sen

t d

irec

tly

for

En

erg

y R

ecov

ery

Lan

dfi

llW

2

83,8

4344

,524

35,8

0612

33,

390

Am

ount

of M

unic

ipal

Sol

id W

aste

(MS

W)

aris

ings

and

man

agem

ent t

ype

in to

nnes


34

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Housing

Completions

7.2 Completions from the beginning of the RCUDP period (April 2001) to 31st March 2014 are shown in Table7.16 'Delivery in Relation to the RCUDP'. In each of the 12 years over this period the annual requirementin the RCUDP has been exceeded (apart from 2013/14), leading to provision by the end of the 2012/2013year being 4,431 dwellings above the theoretical position in the Plan. The figures shown in Table 7.16'Delivery in Relation to the RCUDP', and employed in Figure 7.1 'Housing Trajectory 2001 to 2016 basedon RCUDP', are gross since the housing requirement figure in the 2004 RSS, and from which the housingrequirement is derived, is a gross figure (it includes an allowance for demolitions). Gross completion figuresmust therefore be used in order to measure progress against the housing requirement figure on acomparable basis. The housing requirement in the RCUDP had been delivered by the beginning of the2008/2009 reporting year as demonstrated in Figure 7.1 'Housing Trajectory 2001 to 2016 based onRCUDP'

7.3 As of 22nd February 2013, the Regional Spatial Strategy for Yorkshire and the Humber was revoked bythe Secretary of State. However, since there is no other housing requirement figure which has achievedthe status of having been tested at examination and included in an adopted plan, against which to monitordelivery, this AMR refers to the RSS. Table 7.17 'Delivery in Relation to RSS (2008)' and Figure 7.2'Housing Trajectory 2004 to 2008 based on RSS (2008)' show net completion figures in relation to therequirement in the most recent RSS (adopted May 2008) along with figures for losses to the dwellingstock. Reliable and robust data in relation to losses is more difficult to monitor than dwelling completionsas this data is more fragmented and efforts are continually being made to increase the robustness of thisdata. Since the start of the RSS period in 2004, up to the 2009/2010 monitoring year, a significant numberof dwellings were delivered annually above the requirement in RSS.This is in line with Government policywhich required RSS housing requirements to be considered as a floor rather than a ceiling, subject toadditional provision meeting the core approach in the RSS. The current reporting year is the fourthsuccessive year that the number of net additional dwellings has been lower than the RSS annualrequirement (670).

Table 7.16 Delivery in Relation to the RCUDP

Relationship to 450pain RCUDP

TotalConversionsNew BuildYear

+ 1205701504202001/2002

+ 865361613752002/2003

+ 2877372474902003/2004

+ 59310432717722004/2005

+ 78412344118232005/2006

+ 947139731810792006/2007

+ 94913994129872007/2008

+ 3187681885802008/2009

+ 2577073593482009/2010

+ 444941833112010/2011

+ 635131663472011/2012

+ 605101014092012/2013


35

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


Relationship to 450pain RCUDP

TotalConversionsNew BuildYear

- 77373892842013/2014

44311028130567225Total

Table 7.17 Delivery in Relation to RSS (2008)

Relationship to RSS(500pa to 2008 &670pa to 2026)

NetCompletions

TotalLosses

Demolitionsof Dwellings

Conversions &Changes of Usefrom dwellings toother uses

Year

+ 328828215205102004/2005

+67911795535202005/2006

+8631363342592006/2007

+8501350494452007/2008

+39709595182008/2009

+ 347043302009/2010

- 1834877342010/2011

- 180490237162011/2012

- 1655055502012/2013

- 331339343402013/2014

+1934795448441272Total

Supply

7.4 A detailed breakdown of the overall housing land supply to the end of the Plan period is provided in theRCUDP but a summary is provided below in order to provide a context for both the actual and projecteddelivery figures in this monitoring report. Given the importance historically of windfall sites to housingsupply in Calderdale they are included in Table 7.18 'Indicative Supply of Housing Land as at 31st March2014' as at 31st March 2014 of this monitoring report based on the windfall figures in the RCUDP. As theLocal Plan progress through the statutory plan making process further sites will be allocated to meet thedistrict's housing requirement.The contribution from windfalls will also be re-examined given their importanceto housing delivery in Calderdale.

Table 7.18 Indicative Supply of Housing Land as at 31st March 2014

3100Planning permissions and underconstruction

295 x 5 years only to avoid overlap with planningpermissions

1475Windfalls allowance

Potential contribution from remaining allocationsin Replacement Calderdale UDP

500Allocations

5075Total


36

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

7.5 The first Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) for Calderdale was published in October2009 and covered the period from 2009/2010 to 2025/2026. This demonstrated that for the first 5 yearsof the period covered by the SHLAA there were sufficient deliverable sites to provide in the order of 4,480dwellings giving a 5 year supply figure of 173%. The first (2010) review of the SHLAA included a 5 yearsupply figure of 141% whilst the second (2011) review demonstrated a 5 year supply figure of 124%. Thisincreased to 180% in the 2013 review of the SHLAA where, following publication of the NPPF, a windfallallowance was included. The 2014 review of the SHLAA (not yet published) includes the period beyondthe end of the monitoring year and provides the most recent housing land supply figures together with afull explanation of how they were derived.

7.6 Following revocation of the RSS and in order to determine the objectively assessed housing needs of thedistrict the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) published in 2011 is currently being updatedand will inform the Local Plan. Previously a potential New Growth Point centred on Brighouse/Halifax wasbeing considered by the Council. This is no longer being pursued but many of the potential housing siteslocated in areas associated with this Government initiative will be considered during the preparation ofthe Local Plan. Future monitoring reports will provide further updates on both of these matters.

Future Development

7.7 Determining likely future levels of housing delivery is difficult due to the number of uncertainties involvedbut Government expects local authorities to indicate likely levels of future housing expected to comeforward based on the supply of deliverable sites. This aspect of the trajectory illustrates the level of netadditional housing expected to come forward, traditionally over at least a 15 year period or up to the endof the Plan period, whichever is longer. The trajectory is based on the RSS housing requirement sincethe RCUDP has an end date of 2016 and its requirement has already been met. The RSS, prior torevocation, formed part of the statutory development plan for the district and was a more recent plan.Thisin turn will be replaced by the Local Plan currently in preparation. Given these facts the trajectory is basedon the RSS period to 2026 plus two additional years to give a forward look.

7.8 The first year is the current monitoring year and being already half way through at the time of submittingthe AMR takes account of the number of dwellings already completed in the first two quarters. The next5 year period sets out the net additional dwellings expected to come forward each year over this 5 yearperiod. It takes account of the projected net additional dwellings based on deliverable sites as evidencedin the Draft 2014 review of the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) less actual andassumed completions in Year 1 and averaged over this period.The final version of the 2014 SHLAA reviewhad not been published at the time of the Annual Monitoring Report.

7.9 As shown in Table 7.19 'Projected Net Additional Dwellings' the remainder of the trajectory includes thenet additional dwellings expected to come forward each year based on the average housing requirementfigure included in the Core Strategy Preferred Options document. As the Local Plan progress, sites willbe allocated to reflect the district's housing requirement.

7.10 Government through its core indicators requires the figures for future net housing additions based ondeliverable supply to be adjusted into managed delivery in order to reflect completions in previous yearsand influences on housing delivery including market trends. Current economic conditions are having asignificant effect on housing delivery and it is anticipated that this will continue over the next few years.The projected net additional dwelling figures included in Table 7.20 'Managed Delivery Based on RSS2008' reflect the fact that completion levels are likely to remain similar to current ones for the next fewyears. The current year reflects completion levels during the first two quarters. The subsequent 5 yearsalso broadly reflect recent completion levels but towards the end of this period increase as the marketimproves and allocations in the Local Plan start to contribute to housing delivery. For the remainder ofthe RSS period (2020 onwards) it is assumed that completion levels reflect the average annual housingrequirement figure in the Core Strategy Preferred Options document with an improving housing marketassisting delivery. The use of phasing policies in the Local Plan will assist in managing the delivery ofhousing once adopted. The above is illustrated in Table 7.20 'Managed Delivery Based on RSS 2008'


37

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


http://www.calderdale.gov.uk/environment/planning/local-plan/evidence-base/housingland-availability.html

whilst Figure 7.2 'Housing Trajectory 2004 to 2008 based on RSS (2008)' shows that the RSS housingrequirement may be met around 2025/26, a little later than in previous AMRs.

Table 7.19 Projected Net Additional Dwellings

CommentsRelationshipto 670 in RSS

NumberDwellings

PeriodYear

Includes completions for 1st 2 quarters-350320*CurrentMonitoring Year

2014/2015

-350320Sub-total

Draft SHLAA 2014 Review 'forward look'less windfall allowance, averaged &rounded

-406302015/2016

-406302016/2017

-406302017/2018

-406302018/2019

-406302019/2020

-2003150Sub Total

Reflects average housing requirementfigure in Core Strategy Preferred Optionsdocument.

130800

Remainder ofRSS Period +extended by 2years

2020/2021

1308002021/2022

1308002022/2023

1308002023/2024

1308002024/2025

1308002025/2026

1308002026/2027

1308002027/2028

10406400Sub Total

4909870TOTAL

*Actual Completions Quarters 1 & 2 = 158


38

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

Table 7.20 Managed Delivery Based on RSS 2008

CommentsResidual Reqd tomeetRSS requirement

ManagedDelivery

PeriodYear

Includescompletions for 1st2 quarters.

-350320CurrentMonitoring Year

2014/2015

-350320Sub Total

Assumescompletions

-220450Next 5 Years2015/2016

-1705002016/2017 gradually risingover next few

-1205502017/2018 years as marketimproves with

-706002018/2019 Local Planallocations starting

1308002019/2020to contributearound Years 4and 5

-4502900Sub Total

130800Remainder ofRSS Period + 2Years

2020/2021

1308002021/2022

1308002022/2023

1308002023/2024

1308002024/2025

13080020252026

1308002026/2027

1308002027/2028

10406400Sub Total

2409620TOTAL


39

Calderdale M

BC

| Annual M


Figure 7.1 Housing Trajectory 2001 to 2016 based on RCUDP

Figure 7.2 Housing Trajectory 2004 to 2008 based on RSS (2008)


40

Cal

derd

ale

MB

C |

Ann

ual M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

013

- 20

14

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� ! " � # $ $ $ % % " " �& ' � � � ! � � � � � � � ( � � � � � ) * � � + , + � � ( � � - ( � ./ / / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 2 3 5 0 7 8 9 0 : ;< � = � � > � � � + � � . � � � � + � * � ' � � � � � � , � � , ' � � � , � � � � � � ? � � � � * � � � * � ! " � # $ $ $ % % " " �" � # $ $ $ % % " " �" � # $ $ $ % % " " �