national tax association september 29, 2006 five key things non-lawyers should know about tax law...
TRANSCRIPT
National Tax Association September 29, 2006
Five Key Things Non-Lawyers Should Know About Tax Law and Its Policy Implications
Walter Hellerstein
Francis Shackelford Professor of TaxationUniversity of Georgia Law School
Overview “No Taxation Without Representation”
Is Not a Rule of Law Every Tax That Is Unfair Is Not
Unconstitutional A Tax Is Not an Assessment of Benefits One Person’s State Tax Incentive Is
Another Person’s Discriminatory Tax You Owe a Tax on Things You Buy
Regardless of Where You Buy Them
“No Taxation Without Representation” Is Not
A Rule of Law Residence and Source Bases for
Taxation Residence-based Taxation Without
Representation Political Principle
Source-based Taxation Without Representation Discrimination concerns Administrative concerns
Every Tax That Is Unfair Is Not Unconstitutional
Federal Constitutional Restraints Are Limited Limitations on Federal Taxing Power
Exports, “Direct” Taxes, Geographical Uniformity, Due Process
Limitations on State and Local Taxing Power Equality and Uniformity Extraterritoriality Burdens on Commerce Interference with Federal Supremacy
Finer Tuning Must Come From Legislative Branch
A Tax Is NotAn Assessment of Benefits
Any Other View Would Undermine View That Government Exists to Provide for Common Good
A Tax Is the Means of Distributing the Burden of the Cost of Government
Taxpayers Generally Have No Right to Any Specific Quid Pro Quo for Taxes Paid
Whether a Tax Should Be Designed as an Assessment of Benefits Is a Different Question
One Person’s State Tax Incentive Is Another Person’s Discriminatory
Tax
Reduced tax on stock transfers to encourage trading on New York exchanges
Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax Commission, 429 U.S. 318 (1984)
Tax exemption for pineapple wine to encourage fledgling Hawaii wine industry
Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias, 468 U.S. 263 (1984)
Income tax credit for machinery and equipment to encourage new investment in Ohio
Cuno v. DaimlerChrysler, Inc ., 386 F.3d 738 (6th Cir. 2004), reversed on
other grounds, 126 S. Ct. 1854 (2006) Key Policy Questions:
Who should draw the line: courts or Congress? Where should the line be drawn?
You Owe a Tax on Things You Buy Regardless of Where
You Buy Them
Consumption Should Be Taxed Where Consumption Occurs
Value Added Taxes and Retail Sales/Use Taxes Levy Tax on Goods on Destination Basis
Legal Liability at Destination Is Indisputable Key Practical Question Is Enforceability Key Policy Issues:
Fairness and Efficiency versus Administrability OECD, EU, and U.S. Subnational Initiatives