municipal joint planning and management in indonesia the case of kartamantul, jogja province
DESCRIPTION
MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province. Wahyudi Kumorotomo, PhD [email protected] Master in Public Policy and Administration Gadjah Mada University Indonesia. International Workshop on Local Co-Creation and Manpower Policy in Asia, - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND
MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIAMANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA
The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province
Wahyudi Kumorotomo, PhD
Master in Public Policy and Administration
Gadjah Mada University
Indonesia
International Workshop on Local Co-Creation and Manpower Policy in Asia,Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, 14 November 2009
Current Issues in Indonesian Current Issues in Indonesian Municipal Development Municipal Development PlanningPlanning
After decentralization (2001), municipal development plannings are disintegrated by administrative jurisdictions
Problems of externalities in public services
Many initiatives for cross-border cooperations (Barlingmascakep, Gerbangkertosusila, etc.), limited examples of concrete follow-ups
Lack of focus on local issues (transports, waste management, drainage, disaster risk reduction, etc.)
Inability to promote community participation.
Mutual learning; surveys, interviews, hearings, information gathering
Share visions; views, ideas, values and knowledge
Rules and institutions; identify regulations and available options to set up implementing institution
Set up common priorities; ecological development, drainage or retention options, recreational options, flood proof housing, flood safety regulations, economic rules etc.
Joint design; formulate master plans, feasibility studies, organizational design
Implementation; from ideas into actions, distributing responsibilities, carry out tasks
Monitoring and evaluation; actions are monitored, indicators are gauged, and results are evaluated.
Join Planning ApproachJoin Planning Approach
Joint Planning Joint Planning PrinciplesPrinciples
Foresight. Identify and address infrastructure issues according to current and future demands.
Responsiveness. To reduce the lengthy process of planning and implementation.
Co-ordination. To bring together all the stake-holders and formulate solution for common problems.
Judgement. Timely and reasonable decisions, with a sound technical, managerial, financial and contractual considerations.
Role Sharing. To share the costs, tasks, experience, and the risks of municipal policies.
Sectoral CooperationSectoral Cooperation Solid Waste Disposal Management
Sewerage System Management
Resource Water Management
Transport
Road
Drainage
Spatial Integrated Planning.
Philosophy of Philosophy of CooperationCooperation
Care ; a sincere comitment on realistic programs and concrete actions
Share; willingness to share costs, experience, benefits, and risks
Fair; focus on problem solving, “Win-Win Solution”.
The Shares of The Shares of
Operational & Maintenance Costs Operational & Maintenance Costs
(Rp)(Rp)
TAHUN YOGYAKARTA SLEMAN BANTUL TOTAL
2001 599.315.100 100.923.900 42.620.600 742.859.600
2002 738.743.348 124.403.380 52.536.149 915.682.877
2003 895.340.064 150.774.056 74.882.580 1.120.996.700
2004 1.035.636.080 174.399.716 86.616.364 1.296.652.160
2005 1.281.383.021 215.784.182 107.171.697 1.604.338.900
2006 1.571.617.344 264.659.480 131.446.176 1.967.723.000
2007 1.789.138.080 301.289.850 149.639.070 2.240.067.000
2008 1.853.113.821 355.260.163 153.626.016 2.362.000.000
2009 1.934.115.000 547.563.000 121.222.000 2.602.900.000
Water Resource Water Resource
ManagementManagement
Water Resource Study
Institution Building
Tarriff
Investment
Public-Private Partnership
16
Road ManagementRoad Management
Synchronize Planning & Budgeting
Construction & Rehabilitation
Improve quality of Roads & Bridges
Improve public utilities
18
Transport ManagementTransport Management
1. Public Transport Reform2. Routes3. Park & Ride 4. Double track railways system5. Hub Station6. Rest Area
1. Synchronize Planning & Budgeting
2. Quality of Drainage3. Dimension4. Construction5. Dredging Sediment6. Flood Treatment
Drainage Drainage
ManagementManagement
Spatial ManagementSpatial Management
1. Synchronization of Planning, Budgeting & Controlling
2. Zone Regulation (Recharge, Housing/Settlement, Green Area, Public Space etc)
3. Standardization of Building Permit.
Lesson Learned and Lesson Learned and ChallengesChallenges
1. What is the most successful co-operation and co-creation in “Kartamantul”? Solid Waste Management
2. Next challenge in SWM: • Technology (incinerator, bio-
gas?)• Behavioral change (reduce,
reuse, recycle) 3. Continued delivery of functions
and roles4. Long-term institutional capacity5. Legal & Political Support.
1. Data; No two jurisdiction necessary collect the same information.
2. “Zero-Sum Game”; Local authorities might perceive that benefit goes to an area at the expense of others.
3. Common objectives;It is generally difficult to agree on common objectives.
4. Constituent;No decision-making body has a single constituency.
5. Authority to follow-up agreement;It is difficult to coordinate activities that are not bound by law without sincere mutual agreement.
“Problems of Cross-Border Planning in Multi-State Conurbations” (Meyer, 1997):